| 乡村振兴发展水平测度研究 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 陈,云.乡村振兴发展水平测度研究[J].延边大学理工学报,2020,0(3):233-241. |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 陈 云 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 黎明职业大学 通识教育学院, 福建 泉州 362000 |
| |
| 摘 要： | 以产业兴旺、生态宜居、乡风文明、治理有效和生活富裕5个维度构建了乡村振兴发展的测度指标体系,并以厦门、漳州和泉州为例,采用改进熵权法与灰色关联分析算法相结合的方法对其乡村振兴发展水平进行了测度.测度结果显示,厦门、漳州和泉州的乡村振兴在各维度的发展水平上均存在一定差别.其中:厦门在生态宜居、乡风文明、治理有效和生活富裕4个维度的发展水平最高,其灰色关联度值分别为0.935、0.728、0.859、0.918; 漳州在产业兴旺维度的发展水平最高,其灰色关联度值为0.656,但是在生态宜居和治理有效2个维度的发展水平显著低于厦门和泉州,其灰色关联度值仅为0.388和0.360; 泉州在上述5个维度的发展水平均表现一般,其5个维度的灰色关联度值均在0.5左右.3个城市的乡村振兴综合发展水平由高到低的排序为厦门、漳州、泉州.本文研究结果不仅丰富了乡村振兴发展测度的研究方法,而且也为厦门、漳州和泉州的乡村振兴发展提供了良好的参考依据.
|
| 关 键 词： | 乡村振兴 发展水平测度 改进熵权法 灰色关联分析 |
The measurement of Rural Revitalization development level |
| |
| CHEN Yun.The measurement of Rural Revitalization development level[J].Journal of Yanbian University (Natural Science),2020,0(3):233-241. |
| |
| Authors: | CHEN Yun |
| |
| Affiliation: | College of General Education, Liming Vocational University, Quanzhou 362000, China |
| |
| Abstract: | The measurement index system of Rural Revitalization development is constructed from five dimensions: industrial prosperity, ecological livability, rural civilization, effective governance and well -to -do life. Taking Xiamen, Zhangzhou and Quanzhou as examples, the improved entropy weight method combined with grey correlation analysis is used to measure the Rural Revitalization development level. The results show that there are some differences in the development level of Rural Revitalization in Xiamen, Zhangzhou and Quanzhou. Through the construction of the five dimensions of Rural Revitalization development level measurement index system, the level of Rural Revitalization in the three cities is measured by the method of the improved entropy weight and grey relational analysis. Through the practical application of Xiamen, Zhangzhou and Quanzhou, it is found that there are some differences in the level of Rural Revitalization development. Among the three cities, Xiamen has the highest development level in the four dimensions of ecological livability, rural civilization, effective governance and well -to -do life, with the relational degree values of 0.935, 0.728, 0.859 and 0.918, respectively; The development level of Zhangzhou in the dimension of industrial prosperity is the highest, with the relational degree value of 0.656, while the development level of the two dimensions of ecological livability and effective governance is significantly lower than that of Xiamen and Quanzhou, and the relational degree values are only 0.388 and 0.360; The development level of Quanzhou in the five dimensions is average, and the relational degree value is about 0.5. The comprehensive development level of Rural Revitalization of the three cities is ranked from high to low as Xiamen, Zhangzhou and Quanzhou. The results of this study not only enrich the research methods of Rural Revitalization development, but also provide a good reference for the Rural Revitalization development of Xiamen, Zhangzhou and Quanzhou. |
| |
| Keywords: | Rural Revitalization measurement of development level improved entropy weight method grey relational analysis |
|
| 点击此处可从《延边大学理工学报》浏览原始摘要信息 |
|
点击此处可从《延边大学理工学报》下载全文 |
|
