| 节镍型奥氏体不锈钢的组织性能对比 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 曾垚,杨剑洪,王碧,钱学海,陈小龙,田宇航.节镍型奥氏体不锈钢的组织性能对比[J].金属热处理,2020,45(6):163-166. |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 曾垚 杨剑洪 王碧 钱学海 陈小龙 田宇航 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 1. 广西柳钢中金不锈钢有限公司, 广西 玉林 537624;2. 广西柳州钢铁集团有限公司 技术中心, 广西 柳州 545000 |
| |
| 摘 要： | 针对200系J5A、J5两种牌号节镍型奥氏体不锈钢冷轧压延性能的差异,对比分析J5A、J5钢成分设计、组织、力学性能和马氏体含量,研究冷加工性能差异产生的机理。结果表明:由于J5A钢成分设计不合理,镍当量较低,奥氏体稳定性较差,马氏体转变点Md(30/50)高,在轧制过程中产生大量冷加工变形诱变马氏体,加工硬化程度严重,压延性能差。
|
| 关 键 词： | 节镍型不锈钢 马氏体 冷加工硬化 |
| 收稿时间： | 2019-12-06 |
Comparison of microstructure and properties of low-nickel austenitic stainless steels |
| |
| Zeng Yao,Yang Jianhong,Wang Bi,Qian Xuehai,Chen Xiaolong,Tian Yuhang.Comparison of microstructure and properties of low-nickel austenitic stainless steels[J].Heat Treatment of Metals,2020,45(6):163-166. |
| |
| Authors: | Zeng Yao Yang Jianhong Wang Bi Qian Xuehai Chen Xiaolong Tian Yuhang |
| |
| Affiliation: | 1. Zhongjin Stainless Steel Co., Ltd., Guangxi Liuzhou Steel, Yulin Guangxi 537624, China;2. Technique Center, Guangxi Liuzhou Iron and Steel Group Co., Ltd., Liuzhou Guangxi 545000, China |
| |
| Abstract: | For the cold-rolled drawability differences between grade J5A and grade J5 low-nickel austenitic stainless steels of Series 200 products, the composition design, metallographic structure, mechanical properties and martensitic content were analyzed and compared, and the mechanisms of cold working performance difference were studied. The results show that the unreasonable composition design of J5A steel results in lower nickel equivalent, poorer austenite stability and higher martensite transition point Md(30/50), large quantity of cold deformation induced martensite are generated during rolling, leading to severe work-hardening degree and poor drawability performance. |
| |
| Keywords: | low-nickel stainless steel martensite cold work hardening |
| 本文献已被 CNKI 万方数据 等数据库收录！ |
| 点击此处可从《金属热处理》浏览原始摘要信息 |
|
点击此处可从《金属热处理》下载全文 |
|
