首页 | 官方网站   微博 | 高级检索  
     

四川盆地涪陵地区五峰-龙马溪组页岩气层孔隙特征及对开发的启示
引用本文:刘尧文,王进,张梦吟,蔡进,卢文涛,沈童.四川盆地涪陵地区五峰-龙马溪组页岩气层孔隙特征及对开发的启示[J].石油实验地质,2018,40(1):44-50.
作者姓名:刘尧文  王进  张梦吟  蔡进  卢文涛  沈童
作者单位:1.中国石化 江汉油田分公司, 湖北 潜江 433124
基金项目:国家科技重大专项(2016ZX05060)和中国石化科技项目(P17014-3)资助。
摘    要:页岩孔隙特征是影响页岩含气性的重要因素。综合运用氩离子抛光扫描电镜、高压压汞、液氮吸附等技术,对涪陵地区五峰组-龙马溪组龙一段上部气层孔隙特征进行研究,对比上下部页岩孔隙发育特征的差异性。研究发现,下部气层有机碳含量高,孔隙类型以有机质孔为主,孔体积基本大于0.02 mL/g,BET比表面积基本大于20 m2/g;上部气层有机碳含量低,孔隙类型主要为微裂隙、黏土矿物孔,孔体积主要分布在0.016~0.02 mL/g,比表面积主要为12~20 m2/g。结合单井含气量测试结果,发现有机碳含量与含气量相关性最好,比表面积和孔隙度次之。以此为基础,开展上部气层含气性评价,认为⑧小层为上部气层含气性最佳层段,⑥和⑦小层次之,⑨小层最差。 

关 键 词:孔隙特征    页岩    页岩气    五峰-龙马溪组    涪陵地区    四川盆地
收稿时间:2017-10-13

Pore features of shale gas layer in Wufeng-Longmaxi formations in Fuling area of Sichuan Basin and the application to development
Affiliation:1.SINOPEC Jianghan Oilfield Company, Qianjiang, Hubei 433124, China2. Research Institute of Petroleum Exploration and Development, SINOPEC Jianghan Oilfield Company, Wuhan, Hubei 430223, China
Abstract:Shale porosity is an important factor affecting the gas-bearing capacity of shale. The pore characteristics of the upper gas layer from the Wufeng Formation to the first member of Longmaxi Formation were studied and compared with the lower gas layer by using argon plasma scanning electron microscopy (SEM), high pressure mercury intrusion and liquid nitrogen adsorption. Results show that the organic carbon content of the lower gas layer is high, the pores in the organic matter are dominant, the pore volume is mainly >0.02 mL/g, and the BET specific surface area is mainly >20 m2/g. The organic carbon content of the upper gas layer is low, the pores are mainly micro-fissures and clay mineral pores, the pore volume is mainly distributed from 0.016-0.02 mL/g, and the specific surface area is mainly 12-20 m2/g. Combined with a single well gas content test results, we found that organic carbon content has the best correlation with gas content, followed by specific surface area and porosity. An evaluation of the gas-bearing properties of the upper gas layer was carried out. Sub-layer ⑧ was considered as the best gas layer in the upper interval, while sub-layers ⑥ and ⑦ were the next best, and sub-layer ⑨ the worst. 
Keywords:
本文献已被 CNKI 等数据库收录!
点击此处可从《石油实验地质》浏览原始摘要信息
点击此处可从《石油实验地质》下载全文
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司    京ICP备09084417号-23

京公网安备 11010802026262号