Branching Strategy Selection Approach Based on Vivification Ratio

The two most effective branching strategies LRB and VSIDS perform differently on different types of instances. Generally, LRB is more effective on crafted instances, while VSIDS is more effective on application ones. However, distinguishing the types of instances is difficult. To overcome this drawback, we propose a branching strategy selection approach based on the vivification ratio. This approach uses the LRB branching strategy more to solve the instances with a very low vivification ratio. We tested the instances from the main track of SAT competitions in recent years. The results show that the proposed approach is robust and it significantly increases the number of solved instances. It is worth mentioning that, with the help of our approach, the solver Maple_CM can solve additional 16 instances for the benchmark from the 2020 SAT competition.     

利用近似解加速求解SAT问题的启发式完全算法

结合DPLL完全算法能够证明可满足性(SAT)问题的不可满足性和局部搜索算法快速的优点,提出利用近似解加速求解SAT问题的启发式完全算法.首先利用局部搜索算法快速地得到一个近似解,并将该近似解作为完全算法的初始输入,用于其中分支变量的相位决策.该算法引导完全算法优先搜索近似解所在的子空间,加速解决器找到可满足解的过程,为SAT问题的求解提供了一种新的有效途径.实验结果表明,该算法有效地提高了决策的精度和SAT解决器的效率,对很多实例非常有效.     

Experimental Study on Strategy of CombiningSAT Algorithms

The effectiveness of many SAT algorithms is mainly reflected by their significant performances on one or several classes of specific SAT problems.Different kinds of SAT algorithms all have their own hard instances respectively.Therefore,to get the better performance on all kinds of problems,SAT solver should know how to select different algorithms according to the feature of instances.In this paper the differences of several effective SAT algorithms are analyzed and two new parameters φand δ are proposed to characterize the feature of SAT instances.Experiments are performed to study the relationship between SAT algorithms and some statistical parameters including φ，δ.Based on this analysis,a strategy is presented for designing a faster SAT tester by carefully combining some existing SAT algorithms.With this strategy,a faster SAT tester to solve many kinds of SAT problem is obtained.     

Algorithm portfolio selection as a bandit problem with unbounded losses

We propose a method that learns to allocate computation time to a given set of algorithms, of unknown performance, with the aim of solving a given sequence of problem instances in a minimum time. Analogous meta-learning techniques are typically based on models of algorithm performance, learned during a separate offline training sequence, which can be prohibitively expensive. We adopt instead an online approach, named GAMBLETA, in which algorithm performance models are iteratively updated, and used to guide allocation on a sequence of problem instances. GAMBLETA is a general method for selecting among two or more alternative algorithm portfolios. Each portfolio has its own way of allocating computation time to the available algorithms, possibly based on performance models, in which case its performance is expected to improve over time, as more runtime data becomes available. The resulting exploration-exploitation trade-off is represented as a bandit problem. In our previous work, the algorithms corresponded to the arms of the bandit, and allocations evaluated by the different portfolios were mixed, using a solver for the bandit problem with expert advice, but this required the setting of an arbitrary bound on algorithm runtimes, invalidating the optimal regret of the solver. In this paper, we propose a simpler version of GAMBLETA, in which the allocators correspond to the arms, such that a single portfolio is selected for each instance. The selection is represented as a bandit problem with partial information, and an unknown bound on losses. We devise a solver for this game, proving a bound on its expected regret. We present experiments based on results from several solver competitions, in various domains, comparing GAMBLETA with another online method.     

Iterative and core-guided MaxSAT solving: A survey and assessment

Maximum Satisfiability (MaxSAT) is an optimization version of SAT, and many real world applications can be naturally encoded as such. Solving MaxSAT is an important problem from both a theoretical and a practical point of view. In recent years, there has been considerable interest in developing efficient algorithms and several families of algorithms have been proposed. This paper overviews recent approaches to handle MaxSAT and presents a survey of MaxSAT algorithms based on iteratively calling a SAT solver which are particularly effective to solve problems arising in industrial settings. First, classic algorithms based on iteratively calling a SAT solver and updating a bound are overviewed. Such algorithms are referred to as iterative MaxSAT algorithms. Then, more sophisticated algorithms that additionally take advantage of unsatisfiable cores are described, which are referred to as core-guided MaxSAT algorithms. Core-guided MaxSAT algorithms use the information provided by unsatisfiable cores to relax clauses on demand and to create simpler constraints. Finally, a comprehensive empirical study on non-random benchmarks is conducted, including not only the surveyed algorithms, but also other state-of-the-art MaxSAT solvers. The results indicate that (i) core-guided MaxSAT algorithms in general abort in less instances than classic solvers based on iteratively calling a SAT solver and that (ii) core-guided MaxSAT algorithms are fairly competitive compared to other approaches.     

Solving SAT problem by heuristic polarity decision-making algorithm

This paper presents a heuristic polarity decision-making algorithm for solving Boolean satisfiability (SAT). The algorithm inherits many features of the current state-of-the-art SAT solvers, such as fast BCP, clause recording, restarts, etc. In addition, a preconditioning step that calculates the polarities of variables according to the cover distribution of Karnaugh map is introduced into DPLL procedure, which greatly reduces the number of conflicts in the search process. The proposed approach is implemented as a SAT solver named DiffSat. Experiments show that DiffSat can solve many "real-life" instances in a reasonable time while the best existing SAT solvers, such as Zchaff and MiniSat, cannot. In particular, DiffSat can solve every instance of Bart benchmark suite in less than 0.03 s while Zchaff and MiniSat fail under a 900 s time limit. Furthermore, DiffSat even outperforms the outstanding incomplete algorithm DLM in some instances.     

Improving configuration checking for satisfiable random <Emphasis Type="Italic">k</Emphasis>-SAT instances

Local search algorithms based on the Configuration Checking (CC) strategy have been shown to be efficient in solving satisfiable random k-SAT instances. The purpose of the CC strategy is to avoid the cycling problem, which corresponds to revisiting already flipped variables too soon. It is done by considering the neighborhood of the formula variables. In this paper, we propose to improve the CC strategy on the basis of an empirical study of a powerful algorithm using this strategy. The first improvement introduces a new and simple criterion, which refines the selection of the variables to flip for the 3-SAT instances. The second improvement is achieved by using the powerful local search algorithm Novelty with the adaptive noise setting. This algorithm enhances the efficiency of the intensification and diversification phases when solving k-SAT instances with k ≥ 4. We name the resulting local search algorithm Ncca+ and show its effectiveness when treating satisfiable random k-SAT instances issued from the SAT Challenge 2012. Ncca+ won the bronze medal of the random SAT track of the SAT Competition 2013.     

集成偏好的高维多目标最优软件产品选择算法

在基于搜索的软件工程研究领域,高维多目标最优软件产品选择问题是当前的一个研究热点.既往工作主要采用后验方式（即先搜索再选择）处理软件工程师或终端用户的偏好.与此不同,将用户偏好集成于优化过程,提出了一种新算法以定向搜索用户最感兴趣的软件产品.在算法中,运用权向量表达用户偏好,采用成就标量化函数（achievement scalarizing function,简称ASF）集成各个优化目标,并定义一种新关系比较个体之间的优劣.为了增强算法快速搜索到有效解的能力,分别采用DPLL/CDCL类型和随机局部搜索（SLS）类型可满足性（SAT）求解器实现了替换算子和修复算子.为了验证新算法的有效性,采用21个广泛使用的特征模型进行仿真实验,其中最大特征数为62482,最大约束数为343 944.实验结果表明,基于DPLL/CDCL类型SAT求解器的替换算子有助于算法返回有效软件产品;基于SLS类型SAT求解器的修复算子有助于快速搜索到尽可能满足用户偏好的最终产品.在处理带偏好的高维多目标最优软件产品选择问题时,综合运用两类SAT求解器是一种行之有效的方法.     

Distributed SAT

We present DPLL ABT, a distributed Satisfiability solver (SAT) (Ansótegui and Manyà in IberoAm J Artif Intell 7(20):43–56, 2003) designed to solve distributed SAT problem instances. Since SAT is a particular case of constraint satisfaction, we propose a solving method based on the Asynchronous Backtracking algorithm (ABT) (Yokoo et al. in IEEE Trans Knowl Data Eng 10(5):673–685, 1998) developed for distributed constraint reasoning. In addition, we have applied the Davis-Putnam procedure (DPLL) in every agent, plus the minimum conflict heuristic in case DPLL does not detect any inconsistency. The resulting algorithm improves the performance in terms of communication cost and computational effort versus the basic ABT. The SAT instance is distributed into agents, which cooperate to solve SAT instances just sharing the minimum information. We also present the experimental results that demonstrate the performance of the method in terms of communication and execution time comparing the performance with the basic ABT algorithm.     

Extended clause learning

The past decade has seen clause learning as the most successful algorithm for SAT instances arising from real-world applications. This practical success is accompanied by theoretical results showing clause learning as equivalent in power to resolution. There exist, however, problems that are intractable for resolution, for which clause-learning solvers are hence doomed. In this paper, we present extended clause learning, a practical SAT algorithm that surpasses resolution in power. Indeed, we prove that it is equivalent in power to extended resolution, a proof system strictly more powerful than resolution. Empirical results based on an initial implementation suggest that the additional theoretical power can indeed translate into substantial practical gains.     

Beyond the structure of SAT formulas

Nowadays, many real-world problems are encoded into SAT instances and efficiently solved by modern SAT solvers. These solvers, usually known as Conflict-Driven Clause Learning (CDCL) SAT solvers, include a variety of sophisticated techniques, such as clause learning, lazy data structures, conflict-based adaptive branching heuristics, or random restarts, among others. However, the reasons of their efficiency in solving real-world, or industrial, SAT instances are still unknown. The common wisdom in the SAT community is that these technique exploit some hidden structure of real-world problems.In this thesis, we characterize some important features of the underlying structure of industrial SAT instances. Namely, they are the community structure and the self-similar structure. We observe that most industrial SAT formulas, viewed as graphs, have these two properties. This means that (i) in a graph with a clear community structure, i.e. having high modularity, we can find a partition of its nodes into communities such that most edges connect nodes of the same community; and (ii) in a graph with a self-similar pattern, i.e. being fractal, its shape is kept after re-scalings, i.e., grouping sets of nodes into a single node. We also analyze how these structures are affected by the effects of CDCL techniques during the search.Using the previous structural studies, we propose three applications. First, we face the problem of generating pseudo-industrial random SAT instances using the notion of modularity. Our model generates instances similar to (classical) random SAT formulas when the modularity is low, but when this value is high, our model is also adequate to model realistic pseudo-industrial problems. Second, we propose a method based on the community structure of the instance to detect relevant learnt clauses. Our technique augments the original instance with this set of relevant clauses, and this results into an overall improvement of the efficiency of several state-of-the-art CDCL SAT solvers. Finally, we analyze the classification of industrial SAT instances into families using the previously analyzed structure features, and we compare them to other classifiers commonly used in portfolio SAT approaches.In summary, this dissertation extends the understandings of the structure of SAT instances, with the aim of better explaining the success of CDCL techniques and possibly improve them, and propose a number of applications based on this analysis of the underlying structure of SAT formulas.     

Branch-and-bound algorithm for the maximum triangle packing problem

This work addresses the problem of finding the maximum number of unweighted vertex-disjoint triangles in an undirected graph G. It is a challenging NP-hard combinatorial problem and it is well-known to be APX-hard. A branch-and-bound algorithm which uses a lower bound based on neighborhood degree is presented. A naive upper bound is proposed as well as another one based on a surrogate relaxation of the related integer linear program which is analogous to a multidimensional knapsack problem. Further, a Greedy Search algorithm and a genetic algorithm are described to improve the lower bound. A computational comparison of lower bounds, branch-and-bound algorithm and CPLEX solver is provided using randomly generated benchmarks and well-known DIMACS implementation challenges. The empirical study shows that the branch-and-bound finds the optimal triangle packing solution for small randomly generated MTP instances (up to 100 vertices and 200 triangles) and some DIMACS graphs. For some larger instances and DIMACS challenges graphs, we remark that our lower bound outperforms CPLEX solver regarding the triangle packing solution and the computation time.     

Discovering the suitability of optimisation algorithms by learning from evolved instances

The suitability of an optimisation algorithm selected from within an algorithm portfolio depends upon the features of the particular instance to be solved. Understanding the relative strengths and weaknesses of different algorithms in the portfolio is crucial for effective performance prediction, automated algorithm selection, and to generate knowledge about the ideal conditions for each algorithm to influence better algorithm design. Relying on well-studied benchmark instances, or randomly generated instances, limits our ability to truly challenge each of the algorithms in a portfolio and determine these ideal conditions. Instead we use an evolutionary algorithm to evolve instances that are uniquely easy or hard for each algorithm, thus providing a more direct method for studying the relative strengths and weaknesses of each algorithm. The proposed methodology ensures that the meta-data is sufficient to be able to learn the features of the instances that uniquely characterise the ideal conditions for each algorithm. A case study is presented based on a comprehensive study of the performance of two heuristics on the Travelling Salesman Problem. The results show that prediction of search effort as well as the best performing algorithm for a given instance can be achieved with high accuracy.     

基于演绎长度的学习子句删除策略

学习子句删除策略是CDCL-SAT求解器中的一个重要内容,可以避免内存爆炸和加速单元传播。评估学习子句有用性的标准不同导致所删除的学习子句是不同的,极大地影响求解效率。基于CDCL算法的求解过程可被形式化为增加管理学习子句策略的归结演绎过程,基于此,提出一种基于演绎长度的学习子句评估方法,并与现有的基于文字块距离的评估方法结合,根据排序子句的基准不同,形成两种不同的结合算法。采用国际SAT竞赛的基准实例,与目前主流的求解器进行了实验对比分析。结果表明,所提的结合算法能更好地评估学习子句的有用性,较基于文字块距离策略的求解个数提高了4.1%,说明所提策略具有一定的优势。     

A BDD SAT solver for satisfiability testing: An industrial case study

The satisfiability problem (SAT) is a fundamental problem in mathematical logic, constraint satisfaction, VLSI engineering, and computing theory. Methods to solve the satisfiability problem play an important role in the development of computing theory and systems. In this paper, we give a BDD (Binary Decision Diagrams) SAT solver for practical asynchronous circuit design. The BDD SAT solver consists of a structural SAT formula preprocessor and a complete, incremental SAT algorithm that is able to find an optimal solution. The preprocessor compresses a large size SAT formula representing the circuit into a number of smaller SAT formulas. This avoids the problem of solving very large SAT formulas. Each small size SAT formula is solved by the BDD SAT algorithm efficiently. Eventually, the results of these subproblems are integrated together that contribute to the solution of the original problem. According to recent industrial assessments, this BDD SAT solver provides solutions to the practical, industrial asynchronous circuit design problems.This research is supported in part by the 1993 ACM/IEEE Design Automation Award, by the Alberta Microelectronics Graduate Scholarship, by the NSERC research grant OGP0046423, and was supported in part by the NSERC strategic grant MEF0045793.Presently, Jun Gu is on leave with the Department of Computer Science, Hong Kong University of Science and Technology, Clear Water Bay, Kowloon, Hong Kong.     

Algorithm portfolios for noisy optimization

Noisy optimization is the optimization of objective functions corrupted by noise. A portfolio of solvers is a set of solvers equipped with an algorithm selection tool for distributing the computational power among them. Portfolios are widely and successfully used in combinatorial optimization. In this work, we study portfolios of noisy optimization solvers. We obtain mathematically proved performance (in the sense that the portfolio performs nearly as well as the best of its solvers) by an ad hoc portfolio algorithm dedicated to noisy optimization. A somehow surprising result is that it is better to compare solvers with some lag, i.e., propose the current recommendation of best solver based on their performance earlier in the run. An additional finding is a principled method for distributing the computational power among solvers in the portfolio.     

Automated circular assume-guarantee reasoning

Model checking is a successful approach for verifying hardware and software systems. Despite its success, the technique suffers from the state explosion problem which arises due to the large state space of real-life systems. One solution to the state explosion problem is compositional verification, that aims to decompose the verification of a large system into the more manageable verification of its components. To account for dependencies between components, assume-guarantee reasoning defines rules that break-up the global verification of a system into local verification of individual components, using assumptions about the rest of the system. In recent years, compositional techniques have gained significant successes following a breakthrough in the ability to automate assume-guarantee reasoning. However, automation has been restricted to simple acyclic assume-guarantee rules. In this work, we focus on automating circular assume-guarantee reasoning in which the verification of individual components mutually depends on each other. We use a sound and complete circular assume-guarantee rule and we describe how to automatically build the assumptions needed for using the rule. Our algorithm accumulates joint constraints on the assumptions based on (spurious) counterexamples obtained from checking the premises of the rule, and uses a SAT solver to synthesize minimal assumptions that satisfy these constraints. To the best of our knowledge, our work is the first to fully automate circular assume-guarantee reasoning. We implemented our approach and compared it with established non-circular compositional methods that use learning or SAT-based techniques. The experiments show that the assumptions generated for the circular rule are generally smaller, and on the larger examples, we obtain a significant speedup.     

Efficient software product-line model checking using induction and a SAT solver

Software product line (SPL) engineering is increasingly being adopted in safety-critical systems. It is highly desirable to rigorously show that these systems are designed correctly. However, formal analysis for SPLs is more difficult than for single systems because an SPL may contain a large number of individual systems. In this paper, we propose an efficient model-checking technique for SPLs using induction and a SAT (Boolean satisfiability problem) solver. We show how an induction-based verification method can be adapted to the SPLs, with the help of a SAT solver. To combat the state space explosion problem, a novel technique that exploits the distinguishing characteristics of SPLs, called feature cube enlargement, is proposed to reduce the verification efforts. The incremental SAT mechanism is applied to further improve the efficiency. The correctness of our technique is proved. Experimental results show dramatic improvement of our technique over the existing binary decision diagram (BDD)-based techniques.     

Integrating a SAT Solver with an LCF-style Theorem Prover

This paper describes the integration of a leading SAT solver with Isabelle/HOL, a popular interactive theorem prover. The SAT solver generates resolution-style proofs for (instances of) propositional tautologies. These proofs are verified by the theorem prover. The presented approach significantly improves Isabelle's performance on propositional problems, and furthermore exhibits counterexamples for unprovable conjectures.