Accuracy of an on-line urea monitor compared with urea kinetic model and direct dialysis quantification

To verify the accuracy of a urea monitor (UM) to assess dialysis adequacy, it was compared with a modified direct dialysis quantification method (mDDQ) and with a Casino modified urea kinetic model (mUKM) algorithm. Simplified Jindal and Daugirdas formulas, an anthropometric body water Watson formula, bioelectric impedance analysis, and the Garred model have also been considered. Concerning urea removal, UM results are close to mDDQ, as are the predialytic blood urea nitrogen values obtained by UM in the initial equilibration test. Urea distribution volume results for UM, mDDQ, and bioelectric impedance analysis are similar, whereas it appears clearly overestimated by the Watson formula. Urea monitor clearances are not significantly different from mDDQ, unlike UM Kt/V, which is slightly higher than mDDQ reference value, although with a satisfactory degree of concordance. Rebound effect must be considered by sampling after the equilibration time (et) when mUKM or simplified Kt/V formulas are used: mUKMet Kt/V results are quite similar to mDDQ, as is the Daugirdas value. Regarding NPCR, UM results are neither significantly different from mDDQ nor from the Garred model, whereas mUKM results are significantly overestimated. When rebound is considered, NPCR by mUKMet and NCPR by mDDQ are identical. The UM approach is simple and practical, with a satisfactory degree of reliability for clinical practice.     

Urea kinetic modelling--are any of the 'bedside' Kt/V formulae reliable enough?

BACKGROUND: Longevity on dialysis is determined by many factors. One of these has increasingly been seen to be 'dialysis dose'. There are several methods for calculating dialysis dose. We wanted prospectively to test 'gold-standard' UKM-Kt/V with various shortcut bedside formulae, to see whether reliance on the latter approach was likely to lead to errors in over- or underprescribing dialysis regimens. METHODS: Ten bedside formulae for the calculation of Kt/V (urea) were compared with UKM Kt/V values, in a month-long study involving 507 dialysis sessions in 50 patients in a single-centre in-patient haemodialysis unit. RESULTS: For patients with UKM Kt/V<0.8 (median 0.69, n=140), simplified formulae had a difference (delta) of 0.094-0.396 from the calculated UKM resulting in an inter-method variability ranging from 13 to 57%. The least difference was seen with the Calzavara formula (P=NS), maximum difference with the Barth formulae (P<0.05). No statistically significant differences were seen when comparing Daugirdas 1 and 2 and Keshaviah formulae with UKM, for patients with UKM Kt/V<0.8. For patients with UKM Kt/V in the range 0.8-1.4 (median 1.06, n=285) the extreme recorded values from simplified formulae were 0.012 (least different) and 0.245 (most different) from the UKM mean, with an inter-method variability ranging between 1.1% (Basile method) to 23.1% (Calzavara). No statistically significant difference were seen when comparing Daugirdas 1 and 2, Keshaviah, and Lowrie formulae with UKM, for patients with UKM Kt/V 0.8-1.4. For patients with the highest UKM Kt/V values (>1.4; median 1.58, n=72), all simplified formulae gave Kt/V values lower than UKM Kt/V: the minimum difference was 0.070 using Jindal (P=NS, intermethod variability of 4.4%), while the maximum was seen when using Calzavara (P<0.05; difference = 0.69; intermethod variability of 43.7%). There was also no statistically significant difference for Basile and Kerr methods. For the group as a whole the biggest difference from UKM mean values was obtained using Barth's and Calzavara's formulae (delta of 0.171 and 0.140 respectively (P<0.05)). CONCLUSIONS: The best correlations were seen with the Daugirdas 2 formula (r2=0.953). Also, comparing grouped formulae containing ln(Co/Ct) terms with those incorporating the (Co-Ct)/Co ratio (i.e. the urea reduction) there was a better correlation for all formulae employing the logarithmic transformation (r2=0.951-0.953 cf. r2=0.939-0.940). Nevertheless no bedside formula had the accuracy of UKM-Kt/V.     

Fluid dynamics of gingival tissues

Determining adequacy of dialysis has remained a problem for the nephrologist despite the results of the National Cooperative Dialysis Study published more than 20 years ago. Urea Kinetics Modelling (UKM) which requires computer data entry is time-consuming for the dialysis staff but is the only method that has been rigorously studied. Furthermore, it is unclear today what value of Kt/V represents ideal dialysis; the technique is subject to a number of errors associated with estimation of dialyser clearance (K) and volume of distribution of urea (V) but it is useful for calculating protein catabolic rate (PCR). Methods that use urea reduction ratios (URR) is widely used because it is simpler but not always accurate and suffer from an inability to calculate PCR. Direct dialysis quantification (DDQ) can overcome a number of these problems but it is too cumbersome for routine use. Simpler methods to determine dialysateside kinetics have the advantage of solving a number of these problems and also facilitate the calculation of PCR to determine the patient's nutritional state. In our study we have demonstrated that by taking two dialysate samples at the beginning and at the end of dialysis (2-DSM), it is possible to determine total urea removal (TUR) which is equivalent to DDQ. By taking blood samples after dialysis and before the next dialysis, it is possible to calculate the total urea generated (TUG). The ratio of TUR/TUG will provide an index of dialysis which places emphasis on removal of solute that has accumulated in the inter-dialytic interval thus re-establishing a state of equilibrium. We refer to this index as the Mass Balance Index (MBI). The MBI is also useful in helping to identify those patients whose PCR is inadequate since the mean MBI for patients with an nPCR <0.8 was 0.93 +/- 0.03 vs 1.08 +/- 0.02 in those with a PCR >0.8. In these two groups of patients the Kt/V was not significantly different, 1.49 +/- 0.07 vs 1.53 +/- 0.06, p -0.64. We suggest that the emphasis for adequacy of dialysis should shift away from Kt/V to maintaining a state of equilibrium by removing the solutes that accumulate between dialysis and by identifying those patients with an inadequate PCR.     

Cesarean section rates: effects of participation in a performance measurement project

BACKGROUND: According to previous studies, postdialysis urea rebound (PDUR) is achieved within 30-90 min, leading to an overestimation of Kt/V of between 15 and 40% in 3- to 5-hour dialysis. The purpose of the study was to assess the impact of PDUR on the urea reduction ratio (URR), Kt/V and normal protein catabolic rate (nPCR) with long 8-hour slow hemodialysis. METHODS: This study was performed in 18 patients (13 males/5 females), 62.5 +/- 11.7 years of age, hemodialyzed for 3-265 months. Initial nephropathies were: 3 diabetes; 2 polycystic kidney disease; 3 interstitial nephritis; 2 nephrosclerosis; 3 chronic glomerulonephritis, and 5 undetermined. Residual renal function was negligible. The dialysis sessions were performed using 1- to 1.8-m2 cellulosic dialyzers during 8 h, 3 times a week. Blood flow was 220 ml/min, dialysate flow 500 ml/min, acetate or bicarbonate buffer was used. Serial measurements of the urea concentration were obtained before dialysis, immediately after dialysis (low flow at t = 0), and at 5, 10, 20, 30, 40, 60, 90 and 120 min, and before the next session. The low-flow method was used to evaluate the access recirculation, second-generation Daugirdas formulas for Kt/V, and Watson formulas for total body water volume estimation. The difference between the expected urea generation (UG) and urea measured after dialysis (global PDUR) defines net PDUR (n-PDUR). RESULTS: The n-PDUR usually became stable after 58 +/- 25 (30-90) min. Its mean value was 17 +/- 10% of the 30-second low-flow postdialysis urea (3.9 +/- 2 mmol/l). This small postdialysis urea value and the importance of UG in comparison with shorter dialysis justify the use of n-PDUR. Ignoring n-PDUR would lead to a significant 4% overestimation (p < 0.001) of the URR (79 +/- 7 vs. 76 +/- 8%), 12% of Kt/V (1.9 +/- 0.4 to 1.7 +/- 0.38) and 4% of the nPCR (1.1 +/- 0.3 to 1.05 +/- 0.3). n-PDUR correlated negatively with postdialysis urea (r = 0.45 p = 0.05), positively with URR (r = 0.31 p = 0.01) and Kt/V (r = 0.3 p = 0.03) but not with K, and negatively with the urea distribution volume (r = 0.33 p = 0.05). Mean total recirculation, ultrafiltration rate, predialysis urea levels and urea clearance did not correlate with n-PDUR. CONCLUSION: We found a significant PDUR in long-slow hemodialysis after a mean of 1 h after dialysis. This PDUR has a less important impact upon dialysis delivery estimation than short 3- to 5-hour hemodialysis, especially for the lower Kt/V or URR ranges. This is explained by the low-flux, high-efficiency, and long-term dialysis. Its inter-individual variability incites us to calculate PDUR on an individual basis.     

On-line assessment of delivered dialysis dose

BACKGROUND: The adequacy of the delivered dialysis dose is essential to prevent patient morbidity and mortality. The determination of effective ionic dialysance (D) is easy, non-invasive and inexpensive, and its use instead of effective urea clearance (K) in kinetically determining apparent" urea distribution volume (Vt) is likely to lead to a correct Kt/V, even though the Vt value may be incorrect. The aim of this study was to test the possibility of using the measurement of D to monitor Kt/V on-line during each dialysis treatment. METHODS: Forty-four patients were dialyzed using a monitor equipped with specially designed "Diascan Module" (COT; Hospal) that measures effective D by means of a single conductivity probe. Vt was calculated according to the SPVV three BUN method urea kinetic model using D instead of K values. One month later, Kt/V was calculated as Dt/V, using actual D and T values and the predetermined Vt values updated for the current final body wt. Both the Dt/V and Kt/V determined according to the Smye and Daugirdas methods were compared with the Kt/V determined using the SPVV kinetic model (Kt/Veq) RESULTS: The Kt/V values calculated using ionic dialysance and predetermined Vt were approximately equivalent to those of Kt/Veq (1.14 +/- 0.16 vs. 1.14 +/- 0.17, mean difference 0.00 +/- 0.07), as were those determined according to the Smye and Daugirdas methods (1.10 +/- 0.18 and 1.13 +/- 0.17, mean difference -0.03 +/- 0.06 and 0.01 +/- 0.06, respectively). CONCLUSION: Once Vt has been determined, the evaluation of ionic dialysance in stable patients makes it possible to calculate the Kt/V accurately at each dialysis session without blood or dialysate sampling, and at no additional cost.     

Imprecision of the hemodialysis dose when measured directly from urea removal. Hemodialysis Study Group

BACKGROUND: The postdialysis blood urea nitrogen (BUN; Ct) is a pivotal parameter for assessing hemodialysis adequacy by conventional blood-side methods, but Ct is relatively unstable because of hemodialysis-induced disequilibrium. The uncertainty associated with this method is potentially reduced or eliminated by measuring urea removed on the dialysate side, a more direct approach that can determine adequacy from the fraction of urea removed and by substituting an estimate of the equilibrated postdialysis BUN (Ceq) for Ct. For a patient with a known urea volume (V), Ceq, the equilibrated Kt/V (eKt/V), and the solute removal index (SRI) can be calculated from the predialysis BUN (C0), total urea nitrogen removed (A), and V from simple mass balance calculations (dialysate/volume method). However, a theoretical error analysis showed that relatively small errors in A, C0, or V are magnified when SRI or eKt/V is calculated using this method, especially at higher eKt/V values (for example, if eKt/V = 1.4 per dialysis, a 7% dialysate collection error causes a 20% error in eKt/V). METHODS: During three to four baseline dialyses in each of 39 patients enrolled in the pilot phase of the HEMO Study, "A" was measured using an instrument that sampled dialysate frequently (Biostat), and V was calculated from A, C0, and Ceq (median CV for V = 5.6%). The mean V was then applied to the dialysate/volume method to estimate eKt/V and SRI during two to five subsequent dialyses per patient (comparison dialyses). The accuracy and precision of these estimates were assessed by comparing them with eKt/V and SRI derived from a direct measurement of Ceq drawn 30 minutes after dialysis (reference method), from mathematical curve-fitting of sequential dialysate urea concentrations (dialysate curve-fit method), and from another blood-side method that estimates eKt/V from single pool Kt/V and the fractional rate of solute removal (rate method): eKt/V = spKt/V - 0.6.K/V + 0.03. RESULTS: During 128 comparison dialyses, median absolute errors for calculated eKt/V compared with the reference method were 0.169, 0.061, and 0.071 for the dialysate/volume method, the rate method, and the dialysate curve-fitting method, respectively. The corresponding correlation coefficients were 0.47, 0.88, and 0.81. For SRI, median absolute errors were 0.044, 0.018, and 0.027, and the correlation coefficients were 0.54, 0.85, and 0.74 for the three methods. CONCLUSIONS: The precision of eKt/V and SRI measurements was significantly lower for the dialysate/volume method compared with the blood-side methods. Inclusion of the dialysate curve analysis provided by the Biostat restored precision to the dialysate method to a level comparable to that of the blood-side methods. New techniques employing dialysate urea analysis should include a concentration profile to avoid these inherent methodological errors and assure the accuracy of eKt/V and SRI.     

Low dialysate [K+] decreases efficiency of hemodialysis and increases urea rebound

In a previous study, it was reported that hemodialysis with dialysate [K+] (KD) of 1.0 or 2.0 mmol/L caused an increase in BP shortly after completion of treatment due to arteriolar constriction. With this background, it was hypothesized that a low KD might decrease dialysis efficiency by a similar mechanism. To evaluate this hypothesis, paired observations of two consecutive 3-h treatments, with KD of 1.0 or 3.0 mmol/L, were performed in 14 stable end-stage renal disease patients. A KD of 1.0 mmol/L resulted in lower values for both urea reduction ratio and Kt/V evaluated at completion of dialysis and 1 h thereafter. Values at equilibrium were urea reduction ratio 42+/-1% versus 47+/-2% (P < 0.02), Kt/V 0.65+/-0.03 versus 0.73+/-0.03 (P < 0.02) for KD 1.0 or 3.0 mmol/L, respectively. The mechanisms responsible for the observed differences in dialysis efficiency were examined using a urea kinetics model that predicts urea sequestration caused by impaired blood flow to urea-rich tissues. For this purpose, urea rebound and its effect on Kt/V (by means of deltaKt/V, calculated as equilibrated minus single pool value) with KD 1.0 and 3.0 mmol/L were assessed. Greater urea rebound, 12.8+/-1.6% versus 8.6+/-1.4% (P < 0.001), and larger deltaKt/V, 0.12+/-0.01 versus 0.10+/-0.02 (P < 0.02), were observed with KD 1.0 mmol/L compared with 3.0 mmol/L. The theoretical model accurately predicted the deltaKt/V observed with KD 1.0 mmol/L. It is concluded that a low KD decreases dialysis efficiency. This effect is likely caused by reduced blood perfusion to nonvisceral organs, largely skeletal muscle. Conversely, hemodialysis with KD 3.0 mmol/L facilitates tissue perfusion, minimizes urea trapping in poorly perfused areas, and improves the efficiency of this treatment modality.     

Conductivity: on-line monitoring of dialysis adequacy

Cardiovascular disease and the inadequacy of delivered dialysis are the main factors determining morbidity and mortality in dialysis patients. We have already demonstrated that a conductivity kinetic model makes it possible to match interdialytic sodium loading and intradialytic sodium removal (the main factor determining cardiovascular morbidity) without the need for blood samples and, thus, in routine clinical practice. The aim of the present study was to test the possibility of using the conductivity method also to determine Kt/v without blood or dialysate sampling. In 18 steady-state patients, the urea distribution volume (V) was kinetically determined once using ionic dialysance (D) values instead of those of effective urea clearance. One month later, the Kt/V was determined by using the current D and T values and the predetermined V (Dt/V), then compared with the equilibrated Kt/V computed by means of the SPVV kinetic model (eqKt/V). The mean value of Dt/V was 1.18+/-0.15; while of eqKt/V it was 1.18+/-0.16, with a mean difference of 0.00+/-0.07. The conductivity method therefore seems to be very promising not only for monitoring the sodium balance, but also for quantifying delivered dialysis. Since its simplicity and low-cost make it suitable for use at each dialysis session, the conductivity method could therefore lead to significant progress in dialytic practice by contributing to the elimination of the two main causes of morbidity and mortality in dialysis patients.     

Inverse relation of dietary protein markers with blood pressure. Findings for 10,020 men and women in the INTERSALT Study. INTERSALT Cooperative Research Group. INTERnational study of SALT and blood pressure

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to assess relations to blood pressure (BP) in individuals of markers of dietary protein in their 24-hour urine collections. METHODS AND RESULTS: INTERSALT (INTERnational study of SALT and blood pressure) was a cross-sectional study of 10020 men and women aged 20 to 59 years in 52 population-based samples in 32 countries worldwide, with quality-controlled standardized procedures and assessment of multiple possible confounders. Three measurements of dietary protein in 24-hour urine of each individual participant were studied: total nitrogen and urea as indexes of total protein intake, and sulfate as an index of sulfur-containing dietary amino acids. Repeat examination was performed in a random 8% of participants to assess reliability and to correct for regression-dilution bias. Significant independent inverse relationships were found between BP (systolic and diastolic) and both 24-hour urinary total nitrogen and urea nitrogen, with adjustment for age, sex, alcohol intake, body mass, and 24-hour urinary sodium, potassium, calcium, and magnesium. With adjustment for regression-dilution bias, it was estimated that systolic and diastolic BP were on average 3.0 and 2.5 mm Hg lower, respectively, for persons with dietary total protein intake 30% above the overall mean than for those whose dietary protein intake was 30% below the overall mean (12.94 versus 6.96 g/d urinary total nitrogen, equivalent to 81 versus 44 g/d dietary protein, respectively). For the association of these markers with diastolic BP, results were similar for younger (20- to 39-year-old) and older (40- to 59-year-old) persons and for women and men. For their relation to systolic BP, regression coefficients were larger both for those aged 40 to 59 years than for those aged 20 to 39 years and for women than for men. Nonsignificant inverse relations were recorded for urinary sulfate and BP. CONCLUSIONS: These INTERSALT findings lend support to the hypothesis that higher dietary protein intake has favorable influences on BP.     

Measurement of nutritional status using conventional anthropometry and D2O in Sarawak, Malaysia

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effect of different methods (plateau or back extrapolation) of calculating total body water (TBW) from deuterium dilution in an environment characterised by high water turnover. The back extrapolation model is assumed to be more accurate when water turnover is high. DESIGN: Cross-sectional study with measurement of body composition by deuterium dilution and conventional anthropometry. SETTING: Rural Sarawak, Malaysia. SUBJECTS: 24 adults of the Iban population. RESULTS: TBW was significantly different by method of calculation (P < 0.0001), and mean fat free mass was lower by 1.3 kg using the back extrapolation technique, equivalent to a mean 3.1 (s.d. 0.8)% reduction. The same 1.3 kg difference was equivalent to a mean 16.6 (s.d. 12.3)% increase in fat mass using the back extrapolation technique. Back extrapolation values were used in subsequent analyses. Percentage fat correlated significantly with BMI and skinfold thicknesses in females, but only with BMI in males. Fat mass was significantly correlated with skinfolds and BMI in both sexes. Fat free mass was correlated with BMI in both sexes. CONCLUSIONS: The back extrapolation method produced values for fat mass that differed substantially from those obtained by the plateau method. The difference between calculation methods could be lessened by using saliva samples in place of urine. Back extrapolation values for body fat correlated well with anthropometric measurements in females, less well in males. This difference is due to characteristics of the study population.     

Impaired delivery of hemodialysis prescriptions: an analysis of causes and an approach to evaluation

Serial kinetic modeling is commonly used in hemodialysis to assess the adequacy of dialysis. A variety of problems lead to declining Kt/V in previously stable patients. These include noncompliance, vascular access recirculation, and dialyzer dysfunction. The purpose of this study was to find the relative frequencies of these problems in a group of patients undergoing routine hemodialysis. Simultaneous urea kinetic modeling and access recirculation were tested during 3 consecutive months. The baseline Kt/V was defined as the average of each patient's Kt/V values obtained during the previous 4 mo. A clinically important fall in Kt/V was defined as a decline of > or =0.2 if the baseline Kt/V was > or =1.2, or a decline of > or =0.1 if the baseline Kt/V was <1.2. Ninety-three of 375 (25%) sessions met the criteria for a significant decline in urea kinetic modeling. The baseline Kt/V in this group was 1.33 +/- 0.20 (mean +/- SEM) and declined to 1.02 +/- 0.18 in the abnormal month (P < 0.05). In 42% of instances with a decline of Kt/V, reduced blood processing due to a lower blood flow or shorter time than prescribed was responsible. Recirculation of >12% was found in 25% of sessions with a decrease in Kt/V. These patients most often had access dysfunction or reversed needles. The remaining one-third of patients with decreases in Kt/V had no problem identified, and subsequent monthly kinetic modeling results returned to baseline. These results suggest that analysis of falling urea kinetic modeling results should include a careful review of the dialysis record for reductions in prescribed time or blood flow rates followed by vascular access testing. If these evaluations are unrevealing, urea kinetic modeling results usually return to baseline in the next month.     

Assessment of dialysis adequacy using the dialysate urea monitor: preliminary experience of the dialysate urea monitor

Numerous studies have identified a strong linkage between the delivered dialysis dose (Kt/V) and the survival of hemodialysis (HD) patients. However, the current method used to calculate Kt/V requires multiple blood samples and the process is complex and time consuming. We evaluate the performance of a recently developed on-line monitor (Biostat 1000 dialysate urea monitor, Baxter) that measures the urea concentration in the effluent dialysate and displays Kt/V and nPCR immediately after hemodialysis. To verify the performance of the urea monitor, we selected 21 hemodialysis patients, calculated their Kt/V and nPCR values from blood samples obtained during each hemodialysis, and compared the results with data obtained using the urea monitor. The Kt/V and nPCR values calculated by the urea monitor were both significantly correlated with those obtained using blood samples (R = 0.804, p < 0.001 in Kt/V and R = 0.749, p < 0.001 in nPCR). Our results suggest that the urea monitor may be used for on-line assessment of dialysis adequacy and obviates the need for blood sampling.     

基于BP神经网络的热轧带钢卷取温度预报

 为了提高卷取温度的精度，采用BP神经网络方法并结合大量的现场数据，对热轧带钢层流冷却水冷数学模型中的综合换热系数因子进行预报，将预报结果应用于计算卷取温度的数学模型中，可将卷取温度的计算值控制在目标值的±15 ℃之间，大大提高了卷取温度的精度，具有在线应用的前景。     

Clinical experience of automated peritoneal dialysis

For uremic patients on continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis who are complicated with peritonitis, hernia or burn out of meticulous procedure, automated peritoneal dialysis (APD) is a new alternative therapy. We started our APD program by continuous cyclic peritoneal dialysis (CCPD) method from October, 1991 and this study included 3 CAPD patients. Our studies showed high dose CCPD was better than CAPD in ultrafiltration and urea clearance with similar weekly creatinine clearance and weekly KT/V urea. During the one year treatment course, there was no signs of fluid overload. We performed once to twice day time exchange by low volume dialysate (1500-1600ml) There was no events of abdomen discomfort due to increase intraabdominal pressure or recurrent hernia in susceptible patient. The decrease in day time exchange frequency obviously reduced patients'loading. One patient changed to high dose CCPD due to underdialysis after stand CCPD therapy. Two patients returned to hemodialysis due to severe peritonitis and technique method, but careful assessment of dialysis adequacy with PET test and KT/V evaluation is mandatory.     

Omeprazole attenuates oxygen-derived free radical production from human neutrophils

To look for patients with extreme urea rebound, we drew intradialytic samples one third of the way into dialysis during routine modeling for 3 months. The samples taken postdialysis were obtained after stopping the blood pump, without any slow flow period. Using the Smye equations, the intradialytic urea level was used to predict urea rebound, expressed as Kt/V-equilibrated minus Kt/V-single pool (deltaKt/V). Results were averaged for the 3-month period in 369 patients. Mean estimated deltaKt/V was -0.20 +/- 0.13, which was similar to but slightly higher than the predicted value (-0.6 x K/V + 0.03) of -0.19 +/- 0.04. In 27 patients, extreme rebound (mean deltaKt/V < -0.40) was found. Sixteen of these patients consented to further study, but only after access revision in four patients. In these patients, additional slow flow samples after 15 seconds and 2 minutes of slow flow, respectively, were drawn one third of the way into dialysis and postdialysis, and a sample was drawn 30 minutes after dialysis. On restudy, postdialysis rebound was still high with full flow samples deltaKt/V = -0.40 +/- 25, but was much lower (-0.18 +/- 0.07) and similar to predicted rebound (-0.19 +/- 0.05; P = NS) when based on 15-second slow flow samples. Eight of the 16 had marked (>15%) access recirculation by urea sampling, and deltaKt/V based on full flow post samples correlated with access recirculation (r = -0.91). The results suggest that the Smye method is valuable for identifying patients with aberrantly large postdialysis rebound values. When the postdialysis samples are drawn without an antecedent slow flow period, most patients with extreme rebound values turn out to have marked access recirculation.     

Long duration pressor responses following activation of subfornical organ neurons in rats are the result of increased circulating vasopressin

Electrical stimulation in the subfornical organ (SFO) of male Sprague-Dawley rats resulted in biphasic increases in blood pressure (BP) without a change in heart rate. The initial short duration (0-10 s) increase in BP lasted throughout the 10 s stimulation period (area under the curve (AUC) = 104.3+/-15.26 mmHg/s, (mean+/-SEM) P < 0.001). Upon termination of the electrical stimulus, the BP remained elevated for approximately 55 s (long duration response, AUC = 327.5+/-48.22 mmHg/s, P < 0.001). This long duration BP response was determined to be the result of an increase in circulating vasopressin (VP) as administration of a V1 receptor antagonist abolished this response (AUC = -210.7 +/- 42.38 mmHg/s, P < 0.01). The results of the present study demonstrate that the long duration component of the biphasic increase in BP observed on response to electrical stimulation of the SFO is the result of increased concentrations of circulating VP.     

Do geomagnetic disturbances of solar origin affect arterial blood pressure?

OBJECTIVE: Episodic reports suggest that geomagnetic disturbances of solar origin are associated with biological and clinical events, including increased arterial blood pressure (BP). We reassessed this aspect by relating solar activity levels to ambulatory BP measured in our out-patient population. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The ambulatory BP measurements of 447 consecutive untreated patients attending a hypertension out-patient clinic who did a monitoring for diagnostic purposes over 5 years were retrieved. The mean daytime, night-time and 24-h BP and heart rate values were related to the temporally corresponding geomagnetic index k-sum obtained by the nearest observatory. K-sum is a local measurement of the irregular disturbances of the geomagnetic field caused by solar particle radiation. RESULTS: Significant to highly significant positive correlations were observed for k-sum with systolic (daytime and 24 h) and diastolic BP (daytime, night-time and 24 h), but not with heart rate. No correlations were found with the k-sum of 1 or 2 days before the monitorings. Multiple correlations which also included other potential confounding factors (date, age) confirmed a significant effect of k-sum on BP. Comparison made in season-matched subgroups of quiet and disturbed days (using three different criteria of definition), always showed significantly higher values in the disturbed days for all BP parameters except systolic night-time pressure. The difference between the quietest and the most disturbed days was of about 6 to 8 mm Hg for 24-h systolic and diastolic BP. CONCLUSION: These results are unlikely to be due to unrelated secular trends, but seem to reflect a real relation between magnetic field disturbances and BP.     

Use of iohexol to quantify hemodialysis delivered and residual renal function: technical note

BACKGROUND: Classically, urea (molecular wt = 60) is used to determine the urea reduction ratio (URR) or clearance, based on volume of distribution (Kt/V). These methods are subject to many errors. The purpose of this study was to determine whether iohexol (Io; molecular wt = 821) could be used instead of urea and provide better information as well as middle molecule clearance data. METHODS: Ten hemodialysis (HD) patients were evaluated. All were dialyzed for three hours, and a single bolus of 100 ml of Io was injected immediately post-HD. For direct dialysis quantification (DDQ), the spent dialysate was collected in a drum, and urea and iodine (I) determined immediately prior to, at the end of, and 30 minutes post-HD. As routinely used, DDQ measures clearance directly rather than estimates the levels. RESULTS: Calculated Kt/V urea (1.21+/-0.05) significantly overestimated DDQ Kt/V urea (0.78+/-0.04, P < 0.001) whereas calculated and DDQ Kt/V Io were similar (1.44+/-0.10 vs. 1.36+/-0.05). The URR and iohexol reduction ratio (IoRR) were also different (0.63+/-0.02 vs. 0.69+/-0.02; P < 0.002) with a urea but not Io rebound (URR30 min 0.59+/-0.02, P < 0.05). Calculated urea clearance (C(urea)), 247+/-21 ml/min, significantly overestimated DDQ C(urea) (157+/-10 ml/min P < 0.001). Calculated CIo and DDQ CIo, however, were similar (109+/-8 vs. 104+/-7 ml/min). Total body clearance (TBC) in six anuric subjects was 2.5+/-0.3 ml/min, and in four oliguric subjects was 5.2+/-0.5 ml/min. In 10 additional patients, direct urine measurements demonstrated a non-renal clearance (NRC) of 2.97+/-0.18 ml/min, which was 4.0+/-0.3% of body wt. Use of this factor allowed an estimation of residual renal function (RRF) that accurately reflected measured RRF (1.32+/-0.53 vs. 1.42+/-0.55 ml/min) CONCLUSION: A single injection of Io can be used to determine Kt/V, RR, and RRF without rebound or the inconvenience of urine collection. It may also represent middle molecule clearance better than urea kinetics, and may serve as a superior method for determining HD delivered and dialysis adequacy.     

Clinical application of the Personal Dialysis Capacity (PDC) test: serial analysis of peritoneal function in CAPD patients

BACKGROUND: Peritoneal damage has been reported since the beginning of CAPD therapy. METHODS: To clarify the change of peritoneal function in CAPD patients, we used the Personal Dialysis Capacity (PDC) test in 22 patients with 49 serial studies and 14 patients with single studies. The data were expressed at the condition of 2.5% (2.27 g/dl of glucose), four times at 2,000 ml/day. RESULTS: In the mass analysis, the urea generation rate, creatinine generation rate, PNA/PCR, and water removal via the peritoneum (PD) were kept at the same level for almost eight years, and then gradually decreased. Urine volume and residual renal creatinine clearance (CCr) became zero at six years. On the other hand, PD CCr increased gradually with the time course of CAPD, and therefore the total CCr remained at the level of 6.0 ml/min even after six years. Weekly urea KT/V decreased gradually from almost 2.800 to 2.000. The protein loss remained approximately 7.0 g/day for the initial five years, then became 6.0 g/day, except in five patients who showed levels above 10.0 g/day on the first test of PDC. Weekly urea KT/V was correlated with residual renal CCr (P < 0.005), and significantly correlated with total CCr (weekly urea KT/V = -0.2798 + 0.3720 x total CCr; r = 0.915, P < 0.001). In the serial analysis, when the first and the last tests were compared, the urea generation rate increased significantly (mean +/- SD, 2.800 +/- 3.204 vs. 3.882 +/- 3.382; P < 0.0001); however, water removal via PD (1364 +/- 887 vs. 813 +/- 609; P = 0.021), total ultrafiltration (1762 +/- 841 vs. 1124 +/- 843; P = 0.042), and weekly urea KT/V (2.285 +/- 0.486 vs. 2.112 +/- 0.512; P = 0.026) decreased significantly. The delta water removal via PD/ duration became negative (-10.03 +/- 6.59 ml/week) in all 7 patients after more than four years, however, it was positive (+14.40 +/- 7.84 ml/week) in 6 of 10 patients after less than one year. CONCLUSION: These results suggest that water removal via PD increases within one year, then decreases after four years. The PDC test is useful to evaluate the change of peritoneal function in mass and serial analyses.