Nonisothermal crystallization kinetics of high‐density polyethylene/barium sulfate nanocomposites

The high‐density polyethylene (HDPE)/barium sulfate (BaSO₄) nanocomposites had been successfully prepared by melt‐blending. Nonisothermal melt‐crystallization kinetics of neat HDPE and HDPE/BaSO₄ nanocomposites was investigated with differential scanning calorimetry under different cooling rates. The nonisothermal crystallization behavior was analyzed by Ozawa, Avrami, and combined Ozawa–Avrami methods. It was found that the Ozawa method failed to describe the nonisothermal crystallization behavior of neat HDPE and HDPE/BaSO₄ nanocomposites. The modified Avrami method by Jeziorny was only valid for describing the middle stage of crystallization but was not able to describe the later stage of neat HDPE and HDPE/BaSO₄ nanocomposites crystallization. The value of Avrami exponent n for neat HDPE ranged from 3.3 to 5.7 and for HDPE/BaSO₄ nanocomposites ranged from 1.8 to 2.5. It is postulated that the values of n close to 3 are caused by spherulitic crystal growth with heterogeneous nucleation, whereas simultaneous occurrence of spherulitic and lamellar crystal growth with heterogeneous nucleation account for lower values of n. The combined Ozawa–Avrami method by Mo and coworkers (Polym. Eng. Sci., 37(3) , 568 (1997)) was able to satisfactorily describe the crystallization behavior of neat HDPE and HDPE/BaSO₄ nanocomposites. In addition, the activation energy of nonisothermal crystallization was determined using the Kissinger (J. Res. Natl. Bur. Stand., 57(4) , 217 (1956)) method, showing that the crystallization activation energy of HDPE/BaSO₄ nanocomposites was lower than that of neat HDPE. POLYM. ENG. SCI., 2009. © 2009 Society of Plastics Engineers     

Rheology,Crystallization Kinetics and Mechanical Properties of HDPE/Vinyl-POSS Nanocomposites

Polyhedral oligomeric silsesquioxane (POSS) is usually prepared from the hydrolytic condensation of organotrialkoxysilanes. The rheology, non-isothermal crystallization kinetics and mechanical properties of high density polyethylene (HDPE)/vinyl-containing POSS (V-POSS) nanocomposites were investigated. The results show that the molten HDPE/V-POSS belong to pseudoplastic fluid. The V-POSS can accelerate the nucleation of HDPE at starting stage of crystallization. However, it will decrease the crystallization ability of HDPE in the subsequent crystallization process. The modified Avrami analysis by Jeziorny can well explain the crystallization behaviour of HDPE/V-POSS. The yield strength and tensile modulus of nanocomposites both increase when V-POSS content is 6%.     

Isothermal crystallization kinetics and melting behavior of modified high‐density polyethylene/barium sulfate nanocomposites

The melting/crystallization behavior and isothermal crystallization kinetics of high‐density polyethylene (HDPE)/barium sulfate (BaSO₄) nanocomposites were studied with differential scanning calorimetry (DSC). The isothermal crystallization kinetics of the neat HDPE and nanocomposites was described with the Avrami equation. For neat HDPE and HDPE/BaSO₄ nanocomposites, the values of n ranges from 1.7 to 2.0. Values of the Avrami exponent indicated that crystallization nucleation of the nanocomposites is two‐dimensional diffusion‐controlled crystal growth. The multiple melting behaviors were found on DSC scan after isothermal crystallization process. The multiple endotherms could be attributed to melting of the recrystallized materials or the secondary lamellae caused during different crystallization processes. Adding the BaSO₄ nanoparticles increased the equilibrium melting temperature of HDPE in the nanocomposites. Surface free energy of HDPE chain folding for crystallization of HDPE/BaSO₄ nanocomposites was lower than that of neat HDPE, confirming the heterogeneous nucleation effect of BaSO₄. POLYM. COMPOS., 2011. © 2010 Society of Plastics Engineers     

Isothermal crystallization of HDPE/octamethyl polyhedral oligomeric silsesquioxane nanocomposites: Role of POSS as a nanofiller

The isothermal crystallization of HDPE/POSS (polyhedral oligomeric silsesquioxane) nanocomposites (POSS content varying from 0.25 to 10 wt %) was studied using differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) technique. The Avrami model could successfully describe the isothermal crystallization behavior of the nanocomposites. The value of Avrami exponent (n) varies between 2 and 2.5 for all the compositions studied. For a given composition, the values vary with crystallization temperature and in general increased with POSS content up to 1 wt % POSS content and decreased thereafter. The presence of POSS was found to increase the rate of crystallization, which manifested itself in the increased value of the Avrami rate constant (K) and reduced value of crystallization half‐time (t_1/2). The rate of crystallization peaked at 1 wt % POSS content and was almost constant at higher POSS loadings. X‐ray diffraction studies revealed that POSS exists as nanocrystals in HDPE matrix while some POSS gets dispersed at molecular level too. It is observed that only the POSS dispersed at molecular level acts as a nucleating agent while the POSS nanocrystals do not affect the crystallization process. © 2007 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 2007     

Nonisothermal crystallization kinetics of polyoxymethylene/montmorillonite nanocomposite

The nonisothermal crystallization kinetics of polyoxymethylene (POM), polyoxymethylene/Na–montmorillonite (POM/Na–MMT), and polyoxymethylene/organic–montmorillonite (POM/organ–MMT) nanocomposites were investigated by differential scanning calorimetry at various cooling rates. The Avrami analysis modified by Jeziorny and a method developed by Mo were employed to describe the nonisothermal crystallization process of POM/Na–MMT and POM/organ–MMT nanocomposites. The difference in the values of the exponent n between POM and POM/montmorillonite nanocomposites suggests that the nonisothermal crystallization of POM/Na–MMT and POM/organ–MMT nanocomposites corresponds to a tridimensional growth with heterogeneous nucleation. The values of half‐time and the parameter Z_c, which characterizes the kinetics of nonisothermal crystallization, show that the crystallization rate of either POM/Na–MMT or POM/organ–MMT nanocomposite is faster than that of virgin POM at a given cooling rate. The activation energies were evaluated by the Kissinger method and were 387.0, 330.3, and 328.6 kJ/mol for the nonisothermal crystallization of POM, POM/Na–MMT nanocomposite, and POM/organ–MMT nanocomposite, respectively. POM/montmorillonite nanocomposite can be as easily fabricated as the original polyoxymethylene, considering that the addition of montmorillonite, either Na–montmorillonite or organ–montmorillonite, may accelerate the overall nonisothermal crystallization process. © 2001 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 82: 2281–2289, 2001     

Unique nucleation of multi-walled carbon nanotube and poly(ethylene 2,6-naphthalate) nanocomposites during non-isothermal crystallization

Multi-walled carbon nanotube (MWCNT) and poly(ethylene 2,6-naphthalate) (PEN) nanocomposites are prepared by a melt blending process. There are significant dependence of non-isothermal crystallization behavior and kinetics of PEN/MWCNT nanocomposites on the MWCNT content and cooling rate. The incorporation of MWCNT accelerates the mechanism of nucleation and crystal growth of PEN, and this effect is more pronounced at lower MWCNT content. Combined Avrami and Ozawa analysis is found to be effective in describing the non-isothermal crystallization of the PEN/MWCNT nanocomposites. The MWCNT in the PEN/MWCNT nanocomposites exhibits much higher nucleation activity than any nano-scaled reinforcement. When a vary small quantity of MWCNT was added, the activation energy for crystallization is lower, then gradually increased, and becomes higher than that of pure PEN above 1.0 wt% MWCNT content. The incorporation of MWCNT improves the storage modulus and loss modulus of PEN/MWCNT nanocomposites.     

Non‐isothermal crystallization kinetics of PEG plasticized PLA/G‐POSS nanocomposites

In this study, the non‐isothermal crystallization kinetics of epoxy functionalized poly(hedral oligomeric silsesquioxane) (G‐POSS) reinforced plasticized or unplasticized poly(lactic acid) (PLA) was investigated. Poly(ethylene glycol) (PEG) was used as plasticizer at a constant content of 10% by weight. A micro‐compounder was used to prepare PLA/G‐POSS, PLA/PEG, and PLA/PEG/G‐POSS nanocomposites. G‐POSS content was varied as 1, 3, 7, and 10 wt%. Avrami, Ozawa, and combined Avrami‐Ozawa kinetic models were implemented to understand the non‐isothermal crystallization behavior of aforementioned nanocomposites. Moreover, the nucleation activity of G‐POSS particles was investigated in terms of Dobreva and Gutzow models. The data for kinetic analysis were obtained through differential scanning calorimeter. It was found that the crystallization rate of both plasticized and unplasticized PLA nanocomposites increased with the addition of G‐POSS. It was highlighted that G‐POSS is an effective nucleating agent for plasticized and unplasticized PLA nanocomposites. In parallel, these findings were in good agreement with activation energies obtained from Friedman model. In addition, all kinetic results were supported by polarized optical microscopy. POLYM. COMPOS., 38:1378–1389, 2017. © 2015 Society of Plastics Engineers     

Isothermal and nonisothermal crystallization kinetics of syndiotactic polystyrene/clay nanocomposites

Differential scanning calorimeter (DSC) and X‐ray diffraction methods were used to investigate the isothermal and nonisothermal crystallization behavior and crystalline structure of syndiotactic polystyrene (sPS)/clay nanocomposites. The sPS/clay nanocomposites were prepared by mixing the sPS polymer solution with the organically modified montmorillonite. DSC isothermal results revealed that introducing 5 wt% of clay into the sPS structure causes strongly heterogeneous nucleation, inducing a change of the crystal growth process from mixed three‐dimensional and two‐dimensional crystal growth to two‐dimensional spherulitic growth. The activation energy of sPS drastically decreases with the presence of 0.5 wt% clay and then increases with increasing clay content. The result indicates that the addition of clay into sPS induces the heterogeneous nucleation (a lower ΔE) at lower clay content and then reduces the transportation ability of polymer chains during crystallization processes at higher clay content (a higher ΔE). We studied the non‐isothermal melt‐crystallization kinetics and melting behavior of sPS/clay nanocomposites at various cooling rates. The correlation among crystallization kinetics, melting behavior and crystalline structure of sPS/clay nanocomposites is discussed. Polym. Eng. Sci. 44:2288–2297, 2004. © 2004 Society of Plastics Engineers.     

Non-isothermal crystallization kinetics of polypropylene/MAP-POSS nanocomposites

Non-isothermal crystallization kinetics of polypropylene (PP)/methylacryloypropy polyhedral oligomeric silsesquioxanes (MAP-POSS) nanocomposites (PP/MAP-POSS) were investigated by DSC at various cooling rates. Jeziorny and Mo method were used to study the non-isothermal crystallization kinetics. The results show that the Jeziorny and Mo method are all successful in describing the non-isothermal crystallization kinetics of PP/MAP-POSS nanocomposites. The MAP-POSS can act a role of heterogeneous nucleation and increase the crystallization rate constant Z _c and decrease crystallization half time t _1/2, and the spherulite crystal size decreases, the inter-spherulitic action or crosslinking structure each other appear at the appropriate content. The DSC peak temperature T _p increase about 5 °C, t _1/2 reduce 0.21 min at 6 % content of MAP-POSS and heating rate of 10 °C/min. The MAP-POSS can also increase the mechanical property of PP/MAP-POSS nanocomposites, the tensile strength and impact strength increase from 12.97 to 19.93 MPa and from 33.2 to 52.6 kJ/m², respectively, at 4 % content of MAP-POSS. But the spherulitic crystal becomes larger and boundaries become clearer again; the macrophase separation will occur and mechanical properties decrease when more and more MAP-POSS was added. The nanocomposite has the best mechanical property at 4 % content of MAP-POSS.     

Crystallization,morphology, and mechanical properties of poly(butylene succinate)/poly(ethylene oxide)‐polyhedral oligomeric silsesquioxane nanocomposites

The biodegradable poly(butylene succinate) (PBS)/poly(ethylene oxide)‐polyhedral oligomeric silsesquioxane (PEO‐POSS) nanocomposites were prepared by the solution blending and melt‐injection methods. The effect of PEO‐POSS on the non‐isothermal and isothermal crystallization, morphology, as well as mechanical properties of PBS was carefully investigated. The PEO‐POSS nanoparticles dispersed well in the PBS matrix, with the diameters around 30 nm. From isothermal crystallization analysis, the incorporation of PEO‐POSS enhanced the crystallization of PBS due to the heterogeneous nucleation effect while the crystal structure of PBS remained. PBS/PEO‐POSS nanocomposites showed of higher glass transition temperatures than that of neat PBS, attributing to the existence of PEO‐POSS decreasing the flexibility of PBS chains. The elongation at break of the PBS/PEO‐POSS nanocomposites reached the maximum value with PEO‐POSS content of 5 wt%. However, the elastic modulus of PBS decreased after the incorporation of PEO‐POSS. POLYM. ENG. SCI., 2012. © 2012 Society of Plastics Engineers     

Effect of nano-nucleating agent addition on the isothermal and nonisothermal crystallization kinetics of isotactic polypropylene

Using differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) technique, a comparative study has been made of the isothermal and nonisothermal crystallization kinetics of nonnucleated isotactic polypropylene (iPP) and of nucleated iPP with 0.5 wt% of single-walled carbon nanotubes (SWCNTs) as a nucleating agent. The Avrami exponents (n) of iPP and nucleated iPP are close to 3.0 for isothermal crystallization. These results indicate that the addition of nucleating agents did not change the crystallization growth patterns of the neat polymer and that crystal growth was heterogeneous three-dimensional spherulitic. The results show that the addition of SWCNTs can shorten the crystallization half-time (t _1/2) and increase the crystallization rate of iPP. In the nonisothermal crystallization process, the Ozawa model failed to describe the crystallization behavior of nucleated iPP. The Cazé–Chuah model successfully described the nonisothermal crystallization process of iPP and its nanocomposite. A kinetic treatment based on the Ziabicki theory is presented to describe the kinetic crystallizability, in order to characterize the nonisothermal crystallization kinetics of iPP and nucleated iPP. Polarized light microscopy (PLM) experiments reveal that SWCNTs served as nucleating sites, resulting in a decrease of the spherulite size.     

Crystallization and phase transformation kinetics of poly(1-butene)/MWCNT nanocomposites

Poly(1-butene)/MWCNT nanocomposites were prepared by simple melt processing technique. Crystallization, crystal-to-crystal phase transformation and spherulitic morphology were studied using differential scanning calorimetry (DSC), wide angle X-ray diffraction (WAXD) and optical microscopy (OM). The non-isothermal crystallization exhibited higher values of Z_t derived from Avrami theory and lower values of F(T) obtained from Avrami-Ozawa analysis, while the isothermal crystallization revealed a significant increase in crystallization temperatures and lower crystallization half times compared to pristine PB. The observed changes in the crystallization kinetics were ascribed to the enhanced nucleation of PB in the presence of MWCNT. The nucleating activity calculated from the non-isothermal crystallization data revealed that the MWCNTs provide an active surface for the nucleation of PB. The optical micrographs exhibited significantly smaller crystallites with disordered morphology for the nanocomposites compared to the well defined spherulitic morphology for pristine PB. The rate of phase transformation from kinetically favored tetragonal to thermodynamically stable hexagonal form was noticeably enhanced as evidenced by the reduction in the half time for phase transformation from 58 h to 25 h for PB reinforced with 7% MWCNT.     

Low electrical conductivity threshold and crystalline morphology of single-walled carbon nanotubes - high density polyethylene nanocomposites characterized by SEM, Raman spectroscopy and AFM

The electrical conductivities (σ) of nanocomposites of single-walled carbon nanotubes (SWCNTs) and high density polyethylene (HDPE) have been studied for a large number of nanocomposites prepared in a SWCNT concentration range between 0.02 and 8 wt%. The values of σ obey a percolation power law with an SWCNT concentration threshold, p_c = 0.13 wt%, the lowest yet obtained for any kind of carbon-polyethylene nanocomposites. Improved electrical conductivities attest to an effective dispersion of SWCNT in the polyethylene matrix, enabled by the fast quenching crystallization process used in the preparation of these nanocomposites. Characterization by scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and Raman spectroscopy consistently points to a uniform dispersion of separate small SWCNT bundles at concentrations near p_c and increased nanotube clustering at higher concentrations. Near p_c, high activation energies and geometries of long isolated rods suggest that electron transport occurs by activated electron hopping between nanotubes that are close to each other but still geometrically separate. The degree of SWCNT clustering given by Raman spectroscopy and the barrier energy for electrical conductivity are highly correlated. The nanotubes act as nucleants in the crystallization of the polyethylene matrix, and change the type of supermolecular aggregates from spherulites to axialitic-like objects. The size of crystal aggregates decreases with SWCNT loading, however, in reference to the unfilled polyethylene, the three-dimensional growth geometry extracted from the Avrami exponents remains unchanged up to 2 wt%. Consistency between SEM, Raman and electrical transport behavior suggests that the electrical conductivity is dominated by dispersion and the geometry of the SWCNT in the nanocomposites and not by changes or lack thereof in the HDPE semicrystalline structure.     

Characterization and non-isothermal crystallization behavior of biodegradable poly(ethylene sebacate)/SiO2 nanocomposites

Poly(ethylene sebacate) (PESeb) and PESeb/silica nanocomposites (PESeb/SiO₂) were prepared by in situ polymerization from the direct esterification of ethylene glycol with sebacic acid in the presence of proper amounts of silica nanoparticles. The non-isothermal crystallization behavior of PESeb/SiO₂ nanocomposites has been studied using different theoretical equations such as Avrami, Ozawa and combined Avrami and Ozawa equations. It is found that the addition of nanoparticles of SiO₂ influenced the mechanism of nucleation and the growth of PESeb crystallites. Also, the nanocomposites show a higher Avrami value than the neat PESeb, implying a more complex crystallization configuration. Moreover, the combined Avrami and Ozawa equation can successfully describe the crystallization model under the non-isothermal crystallization. The crystallization activation energies, E _a, calculated from “Kissinger’s equation” have shown that the synthesized PESeb/SiO₂ nanocomposites have lower energy than the neat PESeb, reflecting the much lower energy barrier for the rapid heterogeneous nucleation.     

PE/PE‐g‐MAH/Org‐MMT nanocomposites. II. Nonisothermal crystallization kinetics

The nonisothermal crystallization kinetics of high‐density polyethylene (HDPE) and polyethylene (PE)/PE‐grafted maleic anhydride (PE‐g‐MAH)/organic‐montmorillonite (Org‐MMT) nanocomposite were investigated by differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) at various cooling rates. Avrami analysis modified by Jeziorny, Ozawa analysis, and a method developed by Liu well described the nonisothermal crystallization process of these samples. The difference in the exponent n, m, and a between HDPE and the nanocomposite indicated that nucleation mechanism and dimension of spherulite growth of the nanocomposite were different from that of HDPE to some extent. The values of half‐time (t_1/2), K(T), and F(T) showed that the crystallization rate increased with the increase of cooling rates for HDPE and composite, but the crystallization rate of composite was faster than that of HDPE at a given cooling rate. Moreover, the method proposed by Kissinger was used to evaluate the activation energy of the mentioned samples. It was 223.7 kJ/mol for composite, which was much smaller than that for HDPE (304.6 kJ/mol). Overall, the results indicated that the addition of Org‐MMT and PE‐g‐MAH could accelerate the overall nonisothermal crystallization process of PE. © 2004 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 91: 3054–3059, 2004     

Nonisothermal melt crystallization kinetics of syndiotactic polypropylene/alumina nanocomposites

Nonisothermal melt crystallization kinetics of syndiotactic polypropylene (sPP)/alumina nanocomposites were investigated via differential scanning calorimetry. The addition of alumina nanoparticles significantly increases the number of nuclei and promotes the crystallization rate of sPP. Nonisothermal melt crystallization kinetics was analyzed by fitting the experimental data to a Nakamura model using Matlab. The average values of Avrami exponent n are 1.7 for both sPP and sPP/Al₂O₃ nanocomposites during slow cooling, which implies a two‐dimensional growth is the predominant mechanism of crystallization following a heterogeneous nucleation. The two nanocomposites give n values equal to 2.3 during faster cooling, indicating that the main growth type taking place for sPP/alumina nanocomposites is also the two‐dimensional growth. The subsequent melting behavior shows that the presence of alumina nanoparticles changed both the cold crystallization and the recrystallization of sPP. © 2012 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci, 2012     

Non-isothermal crystallization kinetics assessment of poly(lactic acid)/graphene nanocomposites

In this work, the effects of the presence and modification of graphene nanoplatelets (GNps) on the crystallization of the poly(lactic acid) (PLA) were studied. Functionalization of GNps was accomplished by acid treatment. Nanocomposite samples were prepared by solution method containing pristine and functionalized graphene. In contrast to pristine PLA, crystallization of the samples contains nano filler initiates at higher rates that showed the role of heterogeneous nucleating effects of these particles in crystallization of the PLA. Then, the effect of nano filler functionalization was comprised. Initial slope of the crystallization (S _i) and full width at the half height maximum of crystallization peak are indicative of nucleation rate and spherulite size distribution, respectively; which upon the addition of the functionalized graphene nanoplatelets (FGNps), S _i increased and spherulites gained normal size distribution. Non-isothermal and crystallization kinetics of the samples were studied using differential scanning calorimetry at heating rates of 2, 4, 6 and 10 °C/min. Performed techniques such as furrier transform infrared, dynamic-mechanical thermal analysis and visual observation of sediments confirmed the successful modification of the graphene platelets. Also, non-isothermal analysis pinpointed the fact that crystallization temperature (T _c) of the nanocomposites has increased by 11–21 °C, compared to the neat PLA. Upon verification of Avrami’s theory, it was conducted that dominant mechanism of nucleation of the nanocomposite samples was 2D circular diffusion; wherein, Avrami’s exponent (n) was determined as 2. Moreover, it was deduced from Avrami’s equation that “n” have no discernible changes in nanocomposites containing GNps or FGNps. Electrical devices and shape memories can be the main application of these nanocomposites.     

Effects of silicalite-1 nanoparticles on rheological and physical properties of HDPE

The addition of silicalite-1 nanoparticles (0.2-20 wt%) increased slightly the crystallization temperature of HDPE with silicalite-1 content, at 20 wt% loading by ca. 2.5 °C, but it had little effect on the melting temperature. The nanocomposites displayed a little higher onset degradation temperature than pure polymer by 7-11 °C. The WAXD profiles showed that the intensity of diffraction peaks for HDPE was decreased with increasing silicalite-1 content from 5 wt% but that the peak position of every crystal plane did not shift in the presence of silicalite-1 nanoparticles. The incorporation of the nanoparticles increased the melt viscosity of HDPE with silicalite-1 content. It also increased both storage (G′) and loss modulus (G″). In the so-called Cole-Cole plot, pure HDPE showed a single master curve whose slope was 1.37, while the nanocomposites with 10 and 20 wt% silicalite-1 exhibited the inflection in the low frequency range before which the slopes were 1.22 and 1.02, respectively. Much more accelerated crystallization behavior under shear was observed with silicalite-1 content at the isothermal crystallization temperature of 125 °C than at 120 °C.