Efficacy of spherical aberration correction based on contact lens power

PurposeTo investigate the efficacy of spherical aberration (SA) correction with aspheric contact lenses (aspheric lenses) based on lens power, and compare the results with those of spherical contact lenses (spherical lenses).MethodsOcular higher-order aberrations were measured with a wavefront sensor, in 11 myopic subjects wearing an aspheric lens (Medalist Fresh fit (PUREVISION 2 HD); Bausch + Lomb) or a spherical lens (ACUVUE Oasys; Johnson & Johnson). Six different lens powers (−7.00 diopters (D), −5.00 D, −3.00 D, −1.00 D, +1.00 D, +3.00 D) were used for all subjects. The amount of SA correction from the contact lens at each power was calculated as the difference between SA with the contact lens on-eye and SA of the eye alone.ResultsFor the spherical lenses, SA correction was close to 0.00 μm for the +1.00 D lens, became more positive as the labeled lens power increased and became more negative as the labeled lens power decreased. For the aspheric lenses, SA correction was consistent, from −0.15 to −0.05 μm, for all lens powers except for the −1.00 D lens. SA correction for the spherical and aspheric lenses was significantly different at −7.00 D (p = 0.040), −3.00 D (p = 0.015), −1.00 D (p < 0.001), +1.00 D (p = 0.006), and +3.00 D (p < 0.001) powers.ConclusionAn aspheric lens is capable of correcting SA at different lens powers, and has SA correction in the range of −0.15 to −0.05 μm over a 6 mm aperture.     

Corneal changes following short-term rigid contact lens wear

PurposeThe aim of this cross-over study was to investigate the changes in corneal thickness, anterior and posterior corneal topography, corneal refractive power and ocular wavefront aberrations, following the short term use of rigid contact lenses.MethodFourteen participants wore 4 different types of contact lenses (RGP lenses of 9.5 mm and 10.5 mm diameter, and for comparison a PMMA lens of 9.5 mm diameter and a soft silicone hydrogel lens) on 4 different days for a period of 8 h on each day. Measures were collected before and after contact lens wear and additionally on a baseline day.ResultsAnterior corneal curvature generally showed a flattening with both of the RGP lenses and a steepening with the PMMA lens. A significant negative correlation was found between the change in corneal swelling and central and peripheral posterior corneal curvature (all p ≤ 0.001). RGP contact lenses caused a significant decrease in corneal refractive power (hyperopic shift) of approximately 0.5 D. The PMMA contact lenses caused the greatest corneal swelling in both the central (27.92 ± 15.49 μm, p < 0.001) and peripheral (17.78 ± 12.11 μm, p = 0.001) corneal regions, a significant flattening of the posterior cornea and an increase in ocular aberrations (all p ≤ 0.05).ConclusionThe corneal swelling associated with RGP lenses was relatively minor, but there was slight central corneal flattening and a clinically significant hyperopic change in corneal refractive power after the first day of lens wear. The PMMA contact lenses resulted in significant corneal swelling and reduced optical performance of the cornea.     

Which soft contact lens power is better for piggyback fitting in keratoconus?

PurposeTo evaluate the impact of differente soft contact lens power in the anterior corneal curvature and regularity in subjects with keratoconus.MethodsNineteen subjects (30 eyes) with keratoconus were included in the study. Six corneal topographies were taken with Pentacam Eye System over the naked eye and successively with soft lens (Senofilcon A) powers of −3.00, −1.50, 0.00, +1.50 and +3.00 D. Corneal measurements of mean central keratometry (MCK), maximum tangential curvature (TK), maximum front elevation (MFE) and eccentricity (Ecc) at 6 and 8 mm diameters as well as anterior corneal surface high order aberrations (i.e. total RMS, spherical- and coma-like and secondary astigmatism) were evaluated.ResultsNegative- and plano-powered soft lenses flattened (p < 0.05 in all cases), whereas positive-powered lenses did not induce any significant changes (p > 0.05 in all cases) in MCK in comparison to the naked eye. The TK power decreased with negative lenses (p < 0.05 in both cases) and increased with +3.00 D lenses (p = 0.03) in comparison to the naked eye. No statistically significant differences were found in MFE with any soft lens power in comparison to the naked eye (p > 0.05 in all cases). Corneal eccentricity increased at 8 mm diameter for all lens powers (p < 0.05 in all cases). No statistically differences were found in HOA RMS and spherical-like aberration (both p > 0.05). Statistically differences were found in coma-like and secondary astigmatism (both p < 0.05).ConclusionNegative-powered soft contact lenses provide a flatter anterior surface in comparison to positive-powered lenses in subjects with keratoconus and thus they might be more suitable for piggyback contact lens fitting.     

Overnight orthokeratology with two brands of reverse-geometry contact lenses

PurposeTo evaluate the refractive and corneal topographical changes of overnight orthokeratology in myopia with two brands of contact lenses.MethodsFourty-four eyes of 22 myopic patients with manifest refraction spherical equivalent (MRSE) of −1.00 to −5.00 D (cylinder ≤ −1.0) were fitted with either DreamLens (Hanita Lenses Investments, Hanita, Israel) (group A) or Rinehart–Reeves (R&R; Danker Laboratories, Sarasota, FL) (group B) reverse-geometry lenses. Each subject eye was evaluated in regards to the uncorrected and corrected distance visual acuities, manifest refraction, slit lamp biomicroscopy, and corneal topography at each follow-up examination.ResultsThe follow-up was 1 year. For groups A and B, the mean uncorrected distance visual acuity was −0.02 ± 0.10 log MAR (20/20) and −0.08 ± 0.12 log MAR (20/20) respectively at year-1 examination. The mean MRSE decreased from −2.70 ± 0.9 D to −0.50 ± 0.08 D in group A and −3.1 ± 1.1 to −0.62 ± 0.18 D in group B at week-1; and remained stable thereafter in each group. For both groups, starting with week-1, the mean anterior best-fit sphere (ABFS) was statistically significantly flatter from baseline. A high correlation was found between the change in apical corneal power (ACP) and MRSE (r₁ = 0.79, r₂ = 0.71), and there was a good correlation between the change in ABFS and MRSE (r₁ = 0.67, r₂ = 0.64) in both groups. No significant ocular adverse events were observed during study.ConclusionsBoth types of contact lenses safely and effectively decreased the myopic refractive error at 1 year follow-up. The refractive effect was mainly induced by the changes in the anterior corneal shape and the ACP.     

The effect of tinted soft contact lens wear on functional visual acuity and higher-order aberrations

PurposeTo investigate the differences of functional visual acuity (FVA) and high order aberrations (HOAs) in relation to tinted and clear hydrogel soft contact lens (SCL) wear.MethodsA prospective comparative study was performed in 16 eyes of 16 healthy volunteers. Dynamic visual acuity (using a FVA measurement system) and higher-order aberrations (using a wavefront sensor) were compared in subjects wearing two types of soft contact lenses: 1-day Acuvue^® (Vistakon, Jacksonville, FL) clear and the 1-day Acuvue^® Define^TM (Vistakon, Jacksonville, FL) tinted lens. The blink rates were recorded during FVA testing. The correlation between the difference of HOAs and differences in FVA values was analyzed.ResultsThe mean LogMAR FVA scores with clear and tinted SCLs were 0.07 ± 0.13 and 0.14 ± 0.17 (P < 0.05). The mean blink frequencies with clear and tinted SCL wear were 18.4 ± 8.3 and 25.3 ± 4.7 blinks/min (P < 0.05). Both 3rd-order aberrations and total HOAs showed statistically significant differences between the two types of soft contact lenses for 6 mm pupil measurements (P < 0.05). A significant positive linear correlation was observed between ΔHOAs and ΔLogMAR FVA for 6 mm pupil measurements (R = 0.53, P = 0.04).ConclusionsTinted contact lens wear appears to induce a reduction in optical quality. Functional visual acuity measurement is a useful procedure to study the changes of visual performance and quality in tinted contact lens wear.     

In vitro power profiles of daily disposable contact lenses

PurposeTo evaluate and compare the distribution of refractive power within the optic zone of different soft contact lenses and to investigate the effect of lens decentration on the power profiles.MethodsThe Nimo TR1504 instrument was used to measure the optical power across different aperture diameters (from 1.5 mm to 5.5 mm in steps of 0.5 mm) of four daily disposable contact lenses: DAILIES TOTAL1, Proclear 1-Day, SofLens daily disposable and 1-DAY ACUVUE MOIST. Measurements were performed using a wet cell. Power data were evaluated when contact lenses were in its centered position and after inducing different amounts of lens decentration (from 0.2 mm to 1.0 mm in steps of 0.2 mm).ResultsAll contact lenses showed an increase – more negative – in lens power with distance from the lens center. The amount of change varied depending on the lens. It was about 10% of lens power for DAILIES TOTAL1 (−0.29 diopters (D)), SofLens daily disposable (−0.36 D), and Proclear 1-Day (−0.32 D) whereas 1-DAY ACUVUE MOIST showed a percentage variation of 3.3% (−0.10 D). After inducing a lens decentration up to 1 mm, the power curves were shifted in the negative direction. However, the change obtained in lens power compared with well-centered position was always lower than a quarter of diopter both for all the lenses and aperture diameters.ConclusionsOur results showed a variation of the refractive power from the lens center, becoming more negative toward the periphery, with a negligible effect of the decentration for all disposable contact lenses studied.     

Comparison of conventional method of contact lens fitting and software based contact lens fitting with Medmont corneal topographer in eyes with corneal scar

PurposeTo compare conventional method of contact lens fitting with software based contact lens fitting using Medmont corneal topographer in eyes with nebular and macular corneal scars.MethodsFifteen participants who were diagnosed with nebular and macular scars were fitted with rigid gas permeable lenses using conventional method of contact lens fitting. During the lens dispensing visit, participants underwent Medmont corneal topography. Agreement between the two methods of contact lens fitting was studied.ResultsParameters of contact lenses which were concluded using conventional method was compared to that of software based fitting. Mean difference in base curve of contact lens between the two methods was 0.094 mm ± 0.147 mm (95% CI: +0.383 to −0.194). Mean difference in diameter of contact lens between the two methods was 0.16 mm ± 0.172 mm (95% CI: +0.497 to −0.177). Contact lens parameters that were achieved using two different methods of fitting showed good correlation. Correlation coefficients, as comparison of two methods in base curve and diameter were 0.96 (P < 0.05) and 0.94 (P < 0.05), respectively.ConclusionSoftware based contact lens fitting would be useful for contact lens practitioners to predict initial base curve of contact lens in corneal scars.     

A comparative study of visual function of young myopic adults wearing contact lenses vs. spectacles

PurposeTo evaluate the impact of contact lenses wear vs. spectacles wear on visual function of young adults with mild to moderate myopia.Methods57 students (27 male and 30 female) with a mean age of 23 years old participated in the study. Their mean best corrected visual acuity was 10/10 binocularly, all suffered from mild to moderate myopia (?3.75 sph/SD 1.25 sph) and they were both contact lenses and spectacles wearers. The VF-14 questionnaire was administered to assess the contact lenses wear vs. spectacles wear impact score on general daily living among the young individuals. It was used translated in Greek after following the ‘translation-back translation’ procedure.ResultsThe mean VF-14 score among spectacles and contact lenses wearers was 100 and 86.78 (SD 4.08) respectively. Although there was a significant difference between the two groups (p < 0.05), both scores were related to a satisfactory functional vision for daily living. The contact lenses wearers were facing difficulty especially while driving at night, seeing steps, as well as doing fine handwork (i.e. sewing, knitting or carpentry).ConclusionsThe use of both spectacles and contact lenses provides satisfactory visual functioning for daily activities in young individuals suffering from mild to moderate myopia. However, there is a spectacles’ wear superiority in personal satisfaction when compared to contact lenses.     

Objective and subjective visual performance of multifocal contact lenses: Pilot study

PurposeThe aim of the present study was to compare the objective and subjective visual performance of three different soft multifocal contact lenses.Methods10 subjects (habitual soft contact lens wearers) between the ages of 40 and 45 years participated in the study. Three different multifocal silicone hydrogel contact lenses (Acuvue Oasys, Air Optix and Biofinity) were fit within the same visit. All the lenses were fit according to the manufacturers’ recommendation using the respective fitting guide. Visual performance tests included low and high contrast distance and near visual acuity, contrast sensitivity, range of clear vision and through-focus curve. Objective visual performance tests included measurement of open field accommodative response at different defocus levels and optical aberrations at different viewing distances.ResultsAccommodative response was not significantly different between the three types of multifocal contact lenses at each of the accommodative stimulus levels (p > 0.05). Accommodative lag increased for higher stimulus levels for all 3 types of contact lenses. Ocular aberrations were not significantly different between these 3 contact lens designs at each of the different viewing distances (p > 0.05). In addition, optical aberrations did not significantly differ between different viewing distances for any of these lenses (p > 0.05). ANOVA revealed no significant difference in high and low contrast distance visual acuity as well as near visual acuity and contrast sensitivity function between the 3 multifocal contact lenses and spectacles (p > 0.05).ConclusionsThere was no statistically significant difference in accommodative response, optical aberrations or visual performance between the 3 multifocal contact lenses in early presbyopes.     

The use of daily disposable lenses in problematic reusable contact lens wearers

PurposeReplacing soft contact lenses (CLs) on a daily basis brings a number of advantages, most notably, reduced exposure to deposits, disinfectants, allergens, and other contaminants. This retrospective study estimated the prevalence of problems in current wearers of reusable soft CLs and tested the effect of refitting “problem” patients with daily disposable (DD) hydrogel lenses.MethodsPrevalence was estimated from 398 current reusable CL wearers for: frequent/constant discomfort or dryness, ≥2 h of uncomfortable wear, ≥grade 2 conjunctival hyperaemia (0–4), or ≥grade 3 corneal staining (0–15). In the second part of the study, 217 reusable CL wearers classified as problem patients were randomly refitted with DD lenses manufactured from one of two materials: etafilcon A (n = 96) or nelfilcon A (n = 121) and reassessed 1 week later.ResultsThirty-nine percent (154/398) had some qualifying criterion: reduced comfortable wearing time (CWT), 20%; dryness, 20%; irritation, 5%; corneal staining, 8%; and hyperaemia, 7%. After refitting with DDs, the prevalence of reduced CWT was decreased from 65% to 51% (P = 0.0039), dryness from 60% to 41% (P < 0.0001) and corneal staining from 28% to 21% (P = 0.04). There was no significant change in the prevalence of irritation, or hyperaemia. Some differences were noted between the two lens materials.ConclusionsA high proportion of reusable soft lens wearers encounter clinically relevant signs or symptoms with their current CLs. This study provides evidence that refitting with DD lenses is a useful strategy for alleviating some of the common problems of CL wear.     

Spectral transmittance of UV-blocking soft contact lenses: A comparative study

BackgroundThree major parts of sunlight consist of visible, ultraviolet and infrared radiation. Exposure to ultraviolet radiation (UVR) can result in a spectrum of skin and ocular diseases. UV-blocking contact lenses help provide protection against harmful UV radiation. We studied the ultraviolet and visible light rays transmission in some soft UV-blocking contact lenses.Material and methodsFour available tinted soft lenses (Acuvue Moist, Zeiss CONTACT Day 30 Air spheric, Pretty Eyes and Sauflon 56 UV) have been evaluated for UV and visible transmission. One-way ANOVA testing was performed to establish is there a statistically significant difference between the UV regions and visible spectra means for the contact lenses (α = 0.05).ResultsPretty Eyes, Zeiss CONTACT, Acuvue Moist and Sauflon 56 UV showed UV-B transmittance value of 0.65%, 10.69%, 1.22%, and 5.78%, respectively. Pretty Eyes and Acuvue Moist had UV-A transmittance values of 32% and 34%, Sauflon 56 UV and Zeiss CONTACT had transmittance values of 48% and 43%, respectively. All of the studied lenses transmitted at least 94.6% on the visible spectrum. The results of the one-way ANOVA statistical analysis show that a statistically significant difference exists within the group of contact lenses tested for the visible (p < 0.001), UV-B (p < 0.001) and UV-A (p < 0.001) portions of the spectrum (α = 0.05).ConclusionAcuvue Moist has the best UV-blocking property and also visible transmission between other tested contact lenses in this study.     

Peripheral myopization and visual performance with experimental rigid gas permeable and soft contact lens design

PurposeTo evaluate the performance of two experimental contact lenses (CL) designed to induce relative peripheral myopic defocus in myopic eyes.MethodsTen right eyes of 10 subjects were fitted with three different CL: a soft experimental lens (ExpSCL), a rigid gas permeable experimental lens (ExpRGP) and a standard RGP lens made of the same material (StdRGP). Central and peripheral refraction was measured using a Grand Seiko open-field autorefractometer across the central 60° of the horizontal visual field. Ocular aberrations were measured with a Hartman-Shack aberrometer, and monocular contrast sensitivity function (CSF) was measured with a VCTS6500 without and with the three contact lenses.ResultsBoth experimental lenses were able to increase significantly the relative peripheral myopic defocus up to −0.50 D in the nasal field and −1.00 D in the temporal field (p < 0.05). The ExpRGP induced a significantly higher myopic defocus in the temporal field compared to the ExpSCL. ExpSCL induced significantly lower levels of Spherical-like HOA than ExpRGP for the 5 mm pupil size (p < 0.05). Both experimental lenses kept CSF within normal limits without any statistically significant change from baseline (p > 0.05).ConclusionsRGP lens design seems to be more effective to induce a significant myopic change in the relative peripheral refractive error. Both lenses preserve a good visual performance. The worsened optical quality observed in ExpRGP was due to an increased coma-like and spherical-like HOA. However, no impact on the visual quality as measured by CSF was observed.     

Lens parameter changes under in vitro and ex vivo conditions and their effect on the conjunctiva

PurposeTo quantify changes in contact lens parameters induced by lens wear and determine whether these changes are associated with contact lens-induced conjunctival staining (CLICS).MethodsIn vitro: Lens diameter, sag, edge shape, base curve of six contact lens brands (balafilcon, comfilcon, etafilcon, lotrafilcon B, omafilcon and senofilcon) measured at 21 °C and 35 °C (eye temperature). Ex vivo: Diameter of lenses collected from a prospective, randomised, contra-lateral, cross-over clinical trial from 36 subjects wearing all lens types for 1 week daily wear, measured in 35 °C PBS after removal. Ocular surface was examined for lens-induced conjunctival staining by masked examiner.ResultsIn vitro: Changes in diameter and base curve outside ISO tolerance were found with etafilcon A and omafilcon A. Ex vivo: Comfilcon A and etafilcon A had greatest shrinkage in diameter (0.18 mm) and base curve (0.11 mm steeper) with temperature increase from 21 °C to 35 °C. Senofilcon A, lotrafilcon B and balafilcon A maintained most stable parameters between 21 °C and 35 °C. Changes in diameter and base curve from lens wear were not correlated with CLICS (p > 0.49). Multivariate analysis showed significantly greater levels of lens induced staining were associated with lens modulus (p < 0.001) and knife (p < 0.001) and chisel (p < 0.001) edge shapes.ConclusionsParameter changes induced by lens wear were associated with increasing temperature, but these changes in lens diameter and base curve did not induce CLICS. Modulus and edge shape were associated with increased CLICS. The susceptibility of etafilcon A and omafilcon A lenses to parameter changes might be related to their high water content.     

Anterior segment characteristics of keratoconus eyes in a sample of Asian population

PurposeTo assess changes in anterior segment parameters of keratoconus eyes at different stages of the disease in a sample of the Asian population.MethodsFiles of 32 patients (48 eyes) diagnosed as clinical keratoconus were assessed and the following parameters noted: central corneal thickness (CCT), thinnest corneal thickness (TCT), location of thinnest pachymetry, anterior chamber depth (ACD) at the centre from posterior corneal surface, ACD at 1, 2 and 3 mm inferior-paracentral, ACD at thinnest pachymetry, anterior chamber volume (ACV) and anterior chamber angle (ACA). For analysis, keratoconus eyes were classified into 3 subgroups according to mean keratometry readings (mild: K ≤ 47.0 D, moderate: 47.0 < K < 52.0 D, and severe: K ≥ 52.0 D). Forty-five subjects (45 right eyes) were recruited as a control group. They underwent Pentacam tomographic evaluation. The same parameters were recorded for control subjects as in the keratoconus patients.ResultsEach keratoconus subgroup comprised of 16 eyes. CCT, TCT, ACD at centre, ACD at 1, 2 mm inferior-paracentral and ACD at thinnest pachymetry were statistically different between mild and severe keratoconus groups (P < 0.05). There were also significant differences between normal with each of the moderate and severe keratoconus groups (P < 0.05). Non-significant differences were found in ACV (P = 0.84) and ACA (P = 0.71) between all measured groups.ConclusionWith the exception of ACV and ACA, parameters that include CCT, TCT, ACD at centre, thinnest pachymetry and 1, 2 mm inferior-paracentral were significantly altered with progression of keratoconus. These findings may be useful in monitoring and management of keratoconus patients.     

The accuracy of Goldmann applanation tonometry over silicone hydrogel contact lenses in patients with glaucoma

PurposeTo investigate the accuracy of measuring intraocular pressure over a silicone hydrogel contact lens using Goldmann applanation tonometry in eyes with glaucoma.MethodsThis was a prospective, randomized study and enrolled 28 patients (28 right eyes) with primary open angle glaucoma. Intraocular pressure was taken with and without a silicone hydrogel contact lens (−0.50 D), in situ (using Goldmann applanation tonometry), in a randomized order of measurements. Statistical analysis was performed using paired t-test and Bland–Altman plot.ResultsThe mean difference (± standard deviation) found between intraocular pressure measurement without (mean 16.7 ± 3.2 mmHg) and with (mean 17.3 ± 3.0 mmHg) contact lens was found to be −0.57 ± 2.3 mmHg (95% confidence interval, −1.5 to 0.3). No significant statistical difference was found between the two groups with paired t-test (p = 0.19). The Bland Altman plot showed some evidence of increasing variability of differences between two measures of intraocular pressure, with increasing intraocular pressure. The 95% limits of agreement of the Bland Altman plot were unacceptably large (−5 mmHg to 3.9 mmHg).ConclusionAgreement between Goldmann applanation tonometry with and without contact lenses seems to be poor in patients with glaucoma, especially for high intraocular pressure.     

Efficacy of two silicone-hydrogel contact lenses for bandage use after photorefractive keratectomy

PurposeTo evaluate the efficacy of two silicone hydrogel (SiH) contact lenses, approved for continuous wear for one week, following photorefractive keratectomy (PRK).MethodsForty seven myopic patients (94 eyes) undergone bilateral PRK were enrolled in this prospective, double-masked, comparative study. One eye of each patient was fitted with a Lotrafilcon B lens (Ciba Vision, Duluth, US; 30-day recommended replacement) whereas the fellow eye was fitted with an Asmofilcon A lens (Menicon, Nagoya, Japan; 14-day recommended replacement). Epithelial defect size was assessed using slit lamp biomicroscopy on the day of surgery and at days 1–4 post-operatively. Uncorrected and best-corrected visual acuity and retinal straylight (C-Quant, Oculus Optigerate, Germany) were evaluated pre-operatively and one month post-operatively.ResultsAverage epithelial defect size for Asmofilcon A and Lotrafilcon B was 25.5 ± 11.0 mm² vs. 27.1 ± 9.9 mm² at day 1 (p = 0.007) and 6.3 ± 7.0 mm² vs. 9.2 ± 9.5 mm² at day 2 (p = 0.012) post-operatively. Re-epithelialization at day 3 was completed in 87.2% of the eyes fitted with Asmofilcon A lenses, compared to 74.5% with Lotrafilcon B lenses (p = 0.012). At the 3rd post-operative day 29.8% of re-epithelialized eyes showed irregular suture with Lotrafilcon B, compared to 12.8% eyes with Asmofilcon A lenses (p < 0.001). Finally, no statistically significant differences were found post-operatively between the two lenses retinal straylight (p = 0.98) and best-corrected visual acuity (p = 0.68).ConclusionsSiH lenses can be used as an effective bandage after PRK due to the limited time requested for achieving complete corneal re-epithelialization. Faster and smoother epithelial healing is provided with Asmofilcon A over Lotrafilcon B lenses.     

Predicting success with silicone-hydrogel contact lenses in new wearers

Purposeto evaluate changes in tear metrics and ocular signs induced by six months of silicone-hydrogel contact lens wear and the difference in baseline characteristics between those who successfully continued in contact lens wear compared to those that did not.MethodsNon-invasive Keratograph, Tearscope and fluorescein tear break-up times (TBUTs), tear meniscus height, bulbar and limbal hyperaemia, lid-parallel conjunctival folds (LIPCOF), phenol red thread, fluorescein and lissamine-green staining, and lid wiper epitheliopathy were measured on 60 new contact lens wearers fitted with monthly silicone-hydrogels (average age 36 ± 14 years, 40 females). Symptoms were evaluated by the Ocular Surface Disease Index (OSDI). After six months full time contact lens wear the above metrics were re-measured on those patients still in contact lens wear (n = 33). The initial measurements were also compared between the group still wearing lenses after six months and those who had ceased lens wear (n = 27).ResultsThere were significant changes in tear meniscus height (p = 0.031), bulbar hyperaemia (p = 0.011), fluorescein TBUT (p = 0.027), corneal (p = 0.007) and conjunctival (p = 0.009) staining, LIPCOF (p = 0.011) and lid wiper epitheliopathy (p = 0.002) after six months of silicone-hydrogel wear. Successful wearers had a higher non-invasive (17.0 ± 8.2 s vs 12.0 ± 5.6 s; p = 0.001) and fluorescein (10.7 ± 6.4 s vs 7.5 ± 4.7 s; p = 0.001) TBUT than drop-outs, although OSDI (cut-off 4.2) was also a strong predictor of success.ConclusionSilicone-hydrogel lenses induced significant changes in the tear film and ocular surface as well as lid margin staining. Wettability of the ocular surface is the main factor affecting contact lens drop-out.     

Ocular aberrations and visual function with multifocal versus single vision soft contact lenses

PurposeTo investigate differences in ocular aberrations induced by centre-near multifocal soft contact lenses (SCL) relative to single vision SCLs and their effect on contrast sensitivity function (CSF).MethodsOcular aberrometry was measured in 18 cyclopleged subjects (19–24 years) while wearing Ciba Air Optix low (AOlow) and high (AOhigh) add, Bausch & Lomb PureVision low (PVlow) and high (PVhigh) add multifocals, and a Bausch & Lomb PureVision single vision (PVsv) control with the same −3.00 D distance back vertex power. Zernike polynomials were scaled to 4, 5 and 6 mm pupils. CSF was measured at equivalent distances of 6 m, 1 m and 40 cm while fully corrected with spherical trial lenses at 6 m.ResultsAOlow, AOhigh and PVhigh induced a negative shift in primary spherical aberration (Z12) from PVsv and all multifocal SCLs induced a positive shift in secondary spherical aberration (Z24) (all p < 0.01), without significantly increasing coma. Area under the CSF (AUCSF) reduced at 40 cm for all multifocals relative to PVsv (p < 0.05), but was not significantly different at 6 m or 1 m. A moderate correlation (r = −0.80, p < 0.005) was found between changes in Z12 and AUCSF at 40 cm for AOhigh, with an increase in negative Z12 reducing multifocal-induced loss of CSF.ConclusionsCentre-near multifocal SCLs induced a negative shift in Z12 and a positive shift in Z24. Although CSF was unaffected at 6 m and 1 m it was reduced at 40 cm, possibly because changes in Z12 and Z24 were not great enough to induce a significant shift in centre of focus and increase in depth of field.     

Evaluating the effect of splitting cylindrical power on improving patient tolerance to toric lens misalignment

PurposeEvaluating the impact of splitting toric power on patient tolerance to misorientation such as with intraocular lens rotation.SettingUniversity vision clinic.MethodsHealthy, non astigmats had +1.50D astigmatism induced with spectacle lenses at 90°, 135°, 180° and +3.00D at 90°. Two correcting cylindrical lenses of the opposite sign and half the power each were subsequently added to the trial frame misaligned by 0°, 5° or 10° in a random order and misorientated from the initial axis in a clockwise direction by up to 15° in 5° steps. A second group of adapted astigmats with between 1.00 and 3.00DC had their astigmatism corrected with two toric spectacle lenses of half the power separated by 0°, 5° or 10° and misorientated from the initial axis in both directions by up to 15° in 5° steps. Distance, high contrast visual acuity was measured using a computerised test chart at each lens misalignment and misorientation.ResultsMisorientation of the split toric lenses caused a statistically significant drop in visual acuity (F = 70.341; p < 0.001). Comparatively better acuities were observed around 180°, as anticipated (F = 3.775; p = 0.035). Misaligning the split toric power produced no benefit in visual acuity retention with axis misorientation when subjects had astigmatism induced with a low (F = 2.190, p = 0.129) or high cylinder (F = 0.491, p = 0.617) or in the adapted astigmats (F = 0.120, p = 0.887).ConclusionMisalignment of toric lens power split across the front and back lens surfaces had no beneficial effect on distance visual acuity, but also no negative effect.