一种基于PSM的CMMI过程度量模型

软件过程技术为开发人员提供一个标准的软件开发规范，使得软件开发生产率得以提高。在众多过程技术中SEI推出的软件能力成熟度集成模型(CMMI)过程评估改进框架被广泛地接受和使用。该文阐述了CMMI评估度量框架在实施时所存在的不足，提出了一种针对CMMI并结合PSM理论的软件过程定义度量模型PSM4CMMI，分析了该模型各个组件的作用，介绍了如何利用该模型实现SPMAS系统。     

基于CMMI的软件缺陷度量

软件缺陷度量是提高软件质量,进行软件过程评估的重要手段。把软件度量的相关技术应用到软件缺陷管理中,根据CMMI的度量与分析框架,并结合GQIM度量方法,提出基于CMMI的软件缺陷度量模型。该模型可以指导软件企业实施软件缺陷度量,达到更高的软件能力成熟度等级。     

面向CMMI的软件度量分析过程研究与应用

为了辅助软件组织有效实施符合CMMI模型的软件度量过程,提出了一种GREDR过程框架模型,以指导软件度量的目标策划与过程实施。在实际软件项目过程中的应用结果表明：GREDR模型能够提高软件度量过程的系统性与效用。     

一种基于CMMI的软件过程度量模型

本文在研究软件度量相关理论基础上,根据CMMI软件过程框架,并结合GQIM度量方法,提出一种基于CMMI的软件过程度量模型CPMM.该模型可以指导软件企业进行度量定义并基于度量结果进行组织过程性能分析.     

一种基于CMMI软件过程管理框架的度量系统

通过分析CMMI模型4类过程域的相互关系,将软件开发过程融入到CMMI工程过程域中,设计出软件过程管理自动化框架.在此基础上将度量引入到各过程域中,构建了软件度量系统,研究了度量的选择和定义、度量数据采集自动化的实现以及度量数据的分析,通过实例说明度量在软件过程改进中的作用.     

面向国内中小软件企业的软件度量框架及其研究

现有的软件度量框架大多是面向大型软件企业的,不适合中小软件企业应用。在分析国内中小软件企业特点的基础上,结合已有的自顶向下和自底向上两类软件过程改进模型的优点,给出了一种以产品度量和项目度量为核心,易于向软件能力成熟度模型过渡的,同时支持过程改进的面向国内中小软件企业的软件度量框架。在具体实施该框架中的度量活动和选择度量元时,借鉴了GQM模型的思想,并将其与软件开发过程的IPO模型相结合,提出了IPOAM模型。     

CMMI度量分析过程域在中小企业的研究与实践

为探索中小软件企业实施CMMI度量分析过程域的有效途径,本文首先比较了GQIM和PSM方法,然后结合ISO9001：2000质量管理体系提出了一个度量分析过程域的实施框架及其过程模型,最后说明了一些实践经验。     

基于度量和知识的软件过程管理系统的研究

越来越多的软件企业开展了知识管理和基于CMMI的软件过程改进.首先分析了软件度量与软件过程改进的关系;然后进一步分析了软件度量、知识管理与软件过程改进的关系;最后重点介绍了一个软件过程管理系统的模型框架、系统架构和主要功能.     

基于CMMI的软件度量研究

CMMI为软件产品及软件过程提供了一套定量的表示和分析,即软件度量的模型.有效的软件度量过程能促进组织的软件过程能力的改进.文章结合国内应用特点,介绍了基于CMMI的多层架构软件产品的度量模型,并着重讨论了基于CMMI的软件过程度量,总结了软件过程度量的工作方法和思路,提出了解决国内软件度量的一般性方法,为软件过程改进提供了可行的方法和实践.     

面向中小软件企业的过程改进模型6SBC研究

对于中小软件企业而言,实施能力成熟度模型集成(CMMI)将面临更多的挑战,但是中小软件企业为了在激烈的市场竞争中生存和发展,必须要实施软件过程改进.介绍了CMMI和六西格玛理论,给出了适合中小软件企业的一个剪裁的CMMI框架,并在这个框架的基础上结合六西格玛的DMAIC方法,提出了一个软件过程改进模型6SBC.该模型大大缩短了中小软件企业达到CMMI2和CMMI3级别的实施时间,在竞争激烈的软件市场中有效地提升了中小软件企业的核心竞争力.     

基于CMMI的软件测试过程度量研究

对软件测试过程的度量能够提高软件测试的有效性,保证软件的质量.通过CMMI与软件测试、度量的分析,提出了基于CMMI的软件测试过程模型,并以此为基础对软件测试过程度量元的有效选取进行了研究.建立了CMMI与GQM的映射关系模型,提出了度量元的选取原则,以一个应用案例证明了研究结果的可行性.     

A decision support framework for metrics selection in goal-based measurement programs: GQM-DSFMS

Software organizations face challenges in managing and sustaining their measurement programs over time. The complexity of measurement programs increase with exploding number of goals and metrics to collect. At the same time, organizations usually have limited budget and resources for metrics collection. It has been recognized for quite a while that there is the need for prioritizing goals, which then ought to drive the selection of metrics. On the other hand, the dynamic nature of the organizations requires measurement programs to adapt to the changes in the stakeholders, their goals, information needs and priorities. Therefore, it is crucial for organizations to use structured approaches that provide transparency, traceability and guidance in choosing an optimum set of metrics that would address the highest priority information needs considering limited resources. This paper proposes a decision support framework for metrics selection (DSFMS) which is built upon the widely used Goal Question Metric (GQM) approach. The core of the framework includes an iterative goal-based metrics selection process incorporating decision making mechanisms in metrics selection, a pre-defined Attributes/Metrics Repository, and a Traceability Model among GQM elements. We also discuss alternative prioritization and optimization techniques for organizations to tailor the framework according to their needs. The evaluation of the GQM-DSFMS framework was done through a case study in a CMMI Level 3 software company.     

中小型软件企业的软件过程改进研究

以CMMI理论和其它软件工程理论为基础,探讨一种面向国内软件企业的软件过程改进方法,提出了一个基于CMMI的软件过程改进框架。以帮助企业提高软件过程改进能力。     

中小型软件企业的软件过程改进研究

以CMMI理论和其它软件工程理论为基础,探讨一种面向国内软件企业的软件过程改进方法,提出了一个基于CMMI的软件过程改进框架,以帮助企业提高软件过程改进能力。     

Software SMEs’ unofficial readiness for CMMI<Superscript>®</Superscript>-based software process improvement

The goal of software process improvement (SPI) is to improve software processes and produce high-quality software, but the results of SPI efforts in small- and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) that develop software have been unsatisfactory. The objective of this study is to support the prolific and successful CMMI-based implementation of SPI in SMEs by presenting the facts related to the unofficial adoption of CMMI level 2 process area-specific practices by software SMEs. Two questionnaire surveys were performed, and 42 questionnaires were selected for data analysis. The questionnaires were filled out by experts from 42 non-CMMI-certified software SMEs based in Malaysia and Pakistan. In the case of each process area of CMMI level 2, the respondents were asked to choose from three categories, namely ‘below 50 %,’ ‘50–75 %,’ and ‘above 75 %’. The percentages indicated the extent to which process area-specific practices are routinely followed in the respondents’ respective organizations. To deal with differing standards for defining SMEs, the notion of the common range standard has been introduced. The results of the study show that a large segment of software development SMEs informally follows the specific practices of CMMI level 2 process areas and thus has true potential for rapid and effective CMMI-based SPI. The results further indicate that, in the case of four process areas of CMMI level 2, there are statistically significant differences between the readiness of small and medium software enterprises to adopt the specific practices of those process areas, and between trends on their part to do so unofficially. The findings, manifesting various degrees of unofficial readiness for CMMI-based SPI among SMEs, can be used to define criteria for the selection of SMEs that would be included in SPI initiatives funded by relevant authorities. In the interests of developing fruitful CMMI-based SPI and to enhance the success rate of CMMI-based SPI initiatives, the study suggests that ‘ready’ or ‘potential’ SMEs should be given priority for SPI initiatives.     

软件度量的操作模型

软件企业在实施软件度量的过程中面临最主要的障碍是如何将软件度量转换成可实施的、体现组织过程特征的度量实施过程模型.为解决这一问题,本文基于"软件度量过程也是软件"的思想给出组织级实施软件度量的操作模型OMMP,在此基础上,对基于度量的过程管理框架进行讨论,将度量集成在过程管理框架中.     

Selection priority of process areas based on CMMI continuous representation

An essential decision that must be made by software organizations that adopt the continuous representation of the capability maturity model integration (CMMI) for software process improvement concerns a suitable path that best meets their business objectives and mitigates the organization's risk. However, the CMMI models released by the Software Engineering Institute do not give their adopters any guidance on how to make such a decision. Thus, managers often make subjective selections of the areas in which to implement process improvement. Our study presents a decision support model that assists managers in determining the priorities of the CMMI process areas based on the characteristics of the is being developed. The proposed model was validated by using the ISBSG repository, and an example is presented to demonstrate the application of the model. Given the fact that hardly any research has yet been done on how to select the CMMI process areas to initialize process improvement, this study provides a starting point for the community in considering this important issue.