Bioplastique as a complement in conventional plastic surgery

BACKGROUND: Calcified aortic value disease is increasing with explosively in the elderly. Elevated serum lipoprotein(a) (Lp(a) plays an important role in the pathogenesis of atherosclerosis. Thus, we investigated the relationship between aortic valve sclerosis and serum Lp(a) levels in elderly patients. METHODS: Echocardiography was performed in 97 subjects (77 +/- 7 years, 48 males and 49 females), Lp(a), fasting plasma glucose, and blood pressure were measured at the time of the study. Aortic valve sclerosis was assessed using echocardiography. RESULTS: Aortic valve sclerosis was observed in 63 patients (sclerosis group; 24 males and 39 females) and not in 34 subjects (non-sclerosis group; 24 males and 10 females). Univariable analysis revealed that age, Lp(a) level, and the number of females were higher in the sclerosis group than in the non-sclerosis group (age; 78 +/- 7 vs 74 +/- 7 years, p = 0.0090, Lp(a); cholesterol, triglyceride, and fasting blood glucose did not seem to affect aortic valve sclerosis. In all of 9 patients with serum Lp(a) greater than 60mg/dl aortic valve sclerosis was present. In discriminative analysis, gender (female) (lambda = 0.9038, p = 0.0020) and Lp(a) (lambda = 0.8316, p = 0.0053) were related to aortic valve sclerosis. CONCLUSION: Elevated serum Lp(a) was observed in elderly patients with aortic valve sclerosis.     

Different change in lipoprotein(a) levels from lipid levels of other lipoproteins with improved glycemic control in patients with NIDDM

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate change both in lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] and lipid levels in other lipoproteins in non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus (NIDDM) after short-term improvement of glycemic control. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: We compared Lp(a) levels in 210 NIDDM patients with those in 46 control subjects and evaluated the relationship between glycemic control and Lp(a) levels in diabetic patients. In addition, changes in Lp(a) levels and lipid levels were assessed after the improvement of glycemic control in 54 poorly controlled NIDDM patients. RESULTS: In NIDDM, Lp(a) levels in all patients, 62 patients with HbA1c < 6.0%, and 75 patients with HbA1c between 6.0 and 8.0%, were significantly higher than those in control subjects (19.1 [1.7-106.6], 19.2 [6.0-106.6], and 20.3 [2.7-75.3] vs. 15.4 [2.0-61.7] mg/dl, median [range], P < 0.05). Lp(a) levels in 73 patients with HbA1c of > or = 8.0% (18.7 [1.7-58.8] mg/dl) were not significantly different from those in control subjects. After glycemic control, lipid levels in plasma and in other lipoproteins fell significantly, but Lp(a) did not change (from 18.3 [1.7-58.8] to 18.4 [6.6-95.3] mg/dl). Changes in lipid levels, including Lp(a), did not correlate with those in fasting plasma glucose or HbA1c. CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that elevated Lp(a) levels do not reflect poor glycemic control and that Lp(a) levels are independent of lipid levels in other lipoproteins after improved glycemic control in NIDDM.     

Variation in lipoprotein(a) concentrations among individuals with the same apolipoprotein (a) isoform is determined by the rate of lipoprotein(a) production

Lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] is an atherogenic lipoprotein which is similar in structure to, but metabolically distinct from, LDL. Factors regulating plasma concentrations of Lp(a) are poorly understood. Apo(a), the protein that distinguishes Lp(a) from LDL, is highly polymorphic, and apo(a) size is inversely correlated with plasma Lp(a) level. Even within the same apo(a) isoform class, however, plasma Lp(a) concentrations vary widely. A series of in vivo kinetic studies were performed using purified radiolabeled Lp(a) in individuals with the same apo(a) isoform but different Lp(a) levels. In a group of seven subjects with a single S4-apo(a) isoform and Lp(a) levels ranging from 1 to 13.2 mg/dl, the fractional catabolic rate (FCR) of 131I-labeled S2-Lp(a) (mean 0.328 day-1) was not correlated with the plasma Lp(a) level (r = -0.346, P = 0.45). In two S4-apo(a) subjects with a 10-fold difference in Lp(a) level, the FCR's of 125I-labeled S4-Lp(a) were very similar in both subjects and not substantially different from the FCRs of 131I-S2-Lp(a) in the same subjects. In four subjects with a single S2-apo(a) isoform and Lp(a) levels ranging from 9.4 to 91 mg/dl, Lp(a) concentration was highly correlated with Lp(a) production rate (r = 0.993, P = 0.007), but poorly correlated with Lp(a) FCR (mean 0.304 day-1). Analysis of Lp(a) kinetic parameters in all 11 subjects revealed no significant correlation of Lp(a) level with Lp(a) FCR (r = -0.53, P = 0.09) and a strong correlation with Lp(a) production rate (r = 0.99, P < 0.0001). We conclude that the substantial variation in Lp(a) levels among individuals with the same apo(a) phenotype is caused primarily by differences in Lp(a) production rate.     

Lipoprotein(a) in android obesity and NIDDM

OBJECTIVE: To assess the level of serum lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] in nonobese and obese NIDDM subjects with android body distribution. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: Serum Lp(a) levels were measured in 30 long-standing NIDDM patients (duration of diabetes 12.5 +/- 3 years, mean +/- SD), with 15 of the patients being obese of android distribution (BMI > 30 kg/m2 and waist-to-hip ratio > 0.8). In addition, there were 15 android obese nondiabetic subjects and 10 healthy subjects serving as the control group. RESULTS: All groups of patients in this study (diabetic, obese, and obese diabetic) showed significantly higher levels of Lp(a) than the healthy control group. Lp(a) concentrations were significantly higher in NIDDM patients with android type of obesity than in nondiabetic androids (24.1 +/- 5.6 vs. 14.8 +/- 2.4 mg/dl, P < 0.001). Significantly greater levels of Lp(a) were found in nonobese subjects with diabetes when compared with obese subjects without diabetes (22.3 +/- 4.1 vs. 14.8 +/- 2.4 mg/dl, P < 0.001). Furthermore, Lp(a) serum concentrations were not dependent on the degree of glycemic control (controlled NIDDM 23.6 +/- 5.0 vs. uncontrolled NIDDM 21.4 +/- 2.7 mg/dl, NS), but were much greater in subjects with diabetes complicated by vascular disease (complicated 26.3 +/- 5.0 vs. uncomplicated 20.5 +/- 2.7 mg/dl, P < 0.001). No correlation was found between Lp(a) and other lipid parameters in this study. CONCLUSIONS: Lp(a) levels are significantly elevated in both android-obese and nonobese NIDDM patients regardless of the degree of glycemic control. Lp(a) is an independent risk factor showing greater elevations in those subjects complicated with diabetic vascular diseases.     

Lipoprotein (a) and plasminogen in atherosclerosis

The aim of this study was to evaluate plasma levels of lipoprotein (a) [LP(a)] and plasminogen in patients affected with atherosclerotic disease and to understand the mutual relationships. Eighty-four patients affected with atherosclerosis were examined and divided as follows: group I, 24 patients with peripheral arteriopathy; group II, 40 patients with ischemic heart disease (myocardial infarction and/or angina pectoris); group III, 20 patients with multi-infarct dementia; group IV (control group) with 20 healthy young subjects. The results show that Lp(a) plasma levels, in atherosclerotic patients, are higher than 30 mg/dl, while the plasminogen levels are lower than 80 mg/dl. There is an inverse correlation between these two data. Moreover, a different behaviour of Lp(a) and plasminogen rate related to age of patients, to number of atherosclerotic lesions or to acuteness of ischemic heart disease, was observed.     

Renal failure after thoracoabdominal aortic surgery

PURPOSE: Renal failure remains a common and morbid complication after complex aortic surgery. This study was performed to identify perioperative factors that contribute to postoperative renal failure. METHODS: The perioperative outcomes of 183 patients who underwent thoracoabdominal aortic surgery with supraceliac clamping were reviewed. During the interval from Jan. 1987 to Nov. 1996, thoracoabdominal aneurysm repair was performed in 154 patients (type I, 49 patients [27%]; type II, 21 patients [11.5%]; type III, 55 patients [30%]; type IV, 29 patients [16%]), suprarenal abdominal aortic aneurysm repair in 17 patients (9%), and visceral/renal revascularization procedures in 12 patients (6.5%). Intraoperative management included thoracoabdominal aortic exposure and clamp-and-sew technique with renal artery cold perfusion whenever the renal arteries were accessible (79% of cases). RESULTS: Relevant clinical features included preoperative hypertension (85%), diabetes mellitus (8%), single functioning kidney (10%), recent intravenous contrast injection (34%), renal insufficiency (creatinine level greater than 1.5 mg/dl; 24%), and emergent operation (19%). Acute renal failure, defined as both a doubling of serum creatinine level and an absolute value greater than 3.0 mg/dl, occurred in 21 patients (11.5%), of whom five required hemodialysis (2.7%). Variables associated with this complication included a preoperative creatinine level greater than 1.5 mg/dl (p = 0.004) and a total cross-clamp time greater than 100 minutes (p = 0.035). The operative mortality risk (within 30 days; 8%) was significantly increased with renal failure (odds ratio, 9.2; 95% confidence interval, 2.6 to 33; p < 0.005). CONCLUSIONS: Renal failure, although uncommon in contemporary practice, greatly increases the risk of early death after thoracoabdominal aortic surgery. The overall incidence of renal failure and dialysis requirement in the present series compare favorably with those reported using other operative techniques, specifically partial left heart bypass and distal aortic perfusion. These data suggest that patients who have preoperative renal insufficiency are prone to postoperative renal failure. Furthermore, regional hypothermic perfusion and minimal clamp times are important elements in the prevention of renal failure after thoracoabdominal aortic surgery.     

Potential influence of intraluminal thrombus on abdominal aortic aneurysm as assessed by a new non-invasive method

Intraluminal thrombus may play a role in abdominal aortic aneurysm pathogenesis and rupture. The purpose of this work was to demonstrate the feasibility of a new non-invasive method for the determination of the biomechanical features of the aortic wall and luminal boundary in abdominal aortic aneurysm containing intraluminal thrombus. Automated ultrasonographic measures of infrarenal aortic cross-sectional area (A) were obtained on-line along with non-invasive arterial pressure (p) from eight patients of mean (s.e.m.) age 74(3) years, with abdominal aortic aneurysm (mean dimensions 5.9(0.4) x 5.3(0.5) cm) containing intraluminal thrombus. Luminal boundary and abdominal aortic aneurysm wall were scanned separately. Compliance (C) was computed as C = (Amax - Amin)/[Amax(Pmax - Pmin)], where 'max and 'min' represent maximum and minimum values, respectively. Mean compliance was lower for the abdominal aortic aneurysm wall alone than for the luminal surface enclosed by intraluminal thrombus: 4.0(0.9) x 10(-4)/mmHg versus 9.8(1.7) x 10(-4)/mmHg (P < 0.01). Intraluminal thrombus area was nearly constant over the cardiac cycle, indicating that the thrombus is virtually incompressible. This noninvasive method to assess biomechanical features of abdominal aortic aneurysm has potential to further the understanding of the influences of intraluminal thrombus on aneurysm disease.     

The genomes of three of four novel HPV types, defined by differences of their L1 genes, show high conservation of the E7 gene and the URR

OBJECTIVES: This study was undertaken to test the hypothesis that lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] impairs endothelial function. BACKGROUND: Elevated Lp(a) plasma levels have been demonstrated to be associated with an increased risk of coronary heart disease. In atherosclerosis, endothelial dysfunction is known to be an early indicator of vascular changes. However, the effect of Lp(a) on nitric oxide (NO)-dependent vasodilator response has not yet been determined. We therefore examined the influence of Lp(a) on basal and stimulated NO-mediated vasodilator response in the forearm vascular bed. METHODS: Strain gauge plethysmography was used to measure changes in forearm blood flow produced by intraarterial infusion of increasing doses of acetylcholine (3, 12, 24 and 48 microg/min), sodium nitroprusside (200, 800 and 3,200 ng/min) and N-monomethyl L-arginine (L-NMMA) (1, 2 and 4 micromol/min) in 57 white subjects (mean age +/- SD 37 +/- 14 years). Lp(a) plasma concentrations were determined by rocket immunoelectrophoresis. RESULTS: Endothelium-dependent vasodilation tested by intraarterial acetylcholine and endothelium-independent vascular relaxation tested by intraarterial sodium nitroprusside were not correlated with Lp(a). Similarly, no significant differences in forearm blood flow changes were observed when patients were classified into tertiles according to their individual Lp(a) concentration. In contrast, changes in forearm blood flow after intraarterial L-NMMA indicating basal production and release of NO differed significantly among tertiles. Patients in the highest Lp(a) tertile (49.2 +/- 20.3 mg/dl) had a much greater vasoconstrictive response to L-NMMA than patients in the lowest Lp(a) tertile (4.8 +/- 2.5 mg/dl): 2 micromol/min of L-NMMA, -23.6 +/- 22.5% vs. -10.4 +/- 9.1% (p < 0.02); 4 micromol/min of L-NMMA, -27.8 +/- 10.3% vs. -17.6 +/- 9.9% (p < 0.03). Lp(a) plasma level consistently correlated negatively with the forearm blood flow responses to 4 micromol/min of intraarterial L-NMMA (r = -0.38, p < 0.01). Multiple stepwise regression analysis of variables, including total and high and low density lipoprotein cholesterol, further confirmed that plasma Lp(a) remained a significant independent determinant of forearm blood flow changes in response to L-NMMA (p < 0.02). CONCLUSIONS: The endothelium-dependent vasoconstrictive response to L-NMMA was enhanced in subjects with relatively high Lp(a) plasma levels, suggesting an increased basal production and release of NO. This response seemed to reflect a compensatory mechanism of the endothelium to yet unknown Lp(a)-induced atherosclerotic effects.     

Lipoprotein(a) levels in the Japanese population: influence of age and sex, and relation to atherosclerotic risk factors. The Jichi Medical School Cohort Study

The authors studied the distribution of lipoprotein(a) (Lp(a)) levels with stratification for age and sex, as well as the relation between Lp(a) and atherosclerotic risk factors in a large Japanese population between 1992 and 1993. The subjects were 1,235 males and 1,762 females over 30 years old. Lp(a) was measured by an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. Lp(a) levels were higher in females than in males. The increase in Lp(a) with age was statistically significant, and the proportion of subjects with Lp(a) levels > 30 mg/dl also increased with age. In the obese subjects (body mass index (BMI) (kg/m2) > 26), Lp(a) levels were lower than in the non-obese subjects (BMI < or = 26) (p < 0.01 in males; p < 0.05 in females). Male alcohol drinkers had lower Lp(a) levels than nondrinkers (p < 0.05). Age, low density lipoprotein subtracting Lp(a) cholesterol [Lp(a) x 0.3], and fibrinogen level were all positively correlated with Lp(a) in both sexes. Alcohol consumption (g/day) and triglycerides were inversely correlated with Lp(a) in males, while total cholesterol subtracting Lp(a) cholesterol [Lp(a) x 0.3], high density lipoprotein, and factor VII were positively correlated in females. Multiple logistic regression analysis showed that triglycerides in males and BMI and fibrinogen in females were significant independent variables. The authors conclude that Lp(a) level is affected by various factors, such as alcohol drinking, BMI, sex, and age, and is not only correlated with lipid levels but also with hemostatic factors such as fibrinogen and factor VII.     

Influence of hematocrit on the measurement of lipoproteins demonstrated by the example of lipoprotein(a)

BACKGROUND: The measurement of many parameters of human blood is usually performed in plasma or serum. Since lipoproteins or apolipoproteins, for example, are found almost exclusively in the plasma fraction after low-speed centrifugation, these parameters can be expected to be distributed in a different plasma volume depending on the hematocrit value. Therefore, the measured plasma levels might be relatively too low or too high in comparison to the whole blood concentrations in the case of abnormal hematocrit levels. The aim of our experiments was to evaluate the extent of differences between whole blood and plasma concentrations, taking as an example lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] in hemodialysis patients with documented decreased hematocrit values. METHODS: Lp(a) was measured in plasma as well as whole blood of 15 hemodialysis patients with low hematocrit values (0.29 +/- 0.02) in comparison to 11 control subjects (0.45 +/- 0.04). RESULTS: Plasma concentrations were 27% higher in patients than in controls (19.7 vs. 15.5 mg/dl). The relative difference was twice as high (59%) when measured in whole blood (13.5 vs. 8.5 mg/dl). Similar relative differences were observed when whole blood concentrations of 125 hemodialysis patients and 256 controls were calculated with the formula [Lp(a)plasma * (1-hematocrit)]. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings clearly demonstrate that hematocrit is a strong confounding variable of lipoprotein measurement in epidemiological studies when concentrations are measured in plasma, especially in cases of abnormal hematocrit values. Furthermore, studies investigating the longitudinal changes of lipoproteins should consider potential hematocrit changes.     

Elevated serum lipoprotein (a) levels associated with ulcerative colitis in a young Japanese patient

Thromboembolism has been shown to play a role in the pathogenesis of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). A possibility exists that lipoprotein (a) [Lp(a)], a newly-discovered prothrombotic factor, also participates in the development of at least some cases of IBD. Marked elevation of serum Lp(a) levels was observed in a young patient with ulcerative colitis. A biopsy specimen of the rectal mucosa showed findings compatible with ulcerative colitis, as well as small vessel thrombus occurring within the muscularis mucosa in the rectum. Serum Lp(a) levels were markedly elevated on admission (71 mg/dl), with a gradual decrease to 46 mg/dl on discharge. Moreover, serum Lp(a) levels decreased in parallel with clinical improvement. In the quiescent clinical stage, no small vessel thrombus was observed in the mucosa on follow-up colonoscopy. The association between IBD and hyper-Lp(a)-emia would be presumable but it has been, to our knowledge, previously unreported. The case reported here would be the first young patient, suggesting the presence of hyper-Lp(a)-emia and small vessel thrombus formation occurring in association with the development of ulcerative colitis.     

The role of synaptic junctions in the identification of human consciousness

BACKGROUND: Elevated serum lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] levels are associated with the development of native coronary atherosclerosis. The association between increased levels of Lp(a) and the development of accelerated cardiac allograft vasculopathy (ACAV) in patients who have undergone orthotopic heart transplantation has not been firmly established. METHODS AND RESULTS: We studied 74 consecutive heart transplant recipients with at least 1 year survival to determine the relation between Lp(a) and the presence of ACAV. Recipient and donor clinical and laboratory parameters, including mean serum Lp(a) levels, were obtained. ACAV was defined angiographically as > or =30% stenosis in one or more epicardial arteries. ACAV 1 year after heart transplantation was angiographically present in 26 (35%) patients. Mean donor age (36 +/- 13 years [ACAV (+)] vs 28 +/- 10 years, [ACAV (-)]; p = 0.004) and mean serum triglyceride levels 6 months after transplantation (286 +/- 275 mg/dl [ACAV (+)] vs 169 +/- 85 mg/dl [ACAV (-)]; p = 0.025) were univariate predictors of ACAV. No significant difference in mean serum Lp(a) levels was observed (20 +/- 19 mg/dl [ACAV (+)] vs 30 +/- 30 mg/dl [ACAV (-)]; p = NS). Donor age was the single greatest independent predictor of ACAV by multivariate logistic regression (p = 0.02). CONCLUSIONS: Lp(a) does not appear to be a risk factor for the development of ACAV 1 year after heart transplantation. Further studies are needed to define the influence of serum Lp(a) on the development of cardiovascular disease after orthotopic heart transplantation.     

The results of primary radiotherapy in vaginal carcinoma

The results of two previous and two recent studies of middle-aged males and females are presented to exemplify the clinical importance of lipoprotein(a) (Lp(a)) as a risk factor for atherosclerosis and coronary heart disease. In these studies various conventional and recently suggested risk factors were included and different methods for Lp(a) quantification were used. Lp(a) was a significant risk factor in all four studies. In the recent prospective case-control study, Lp(a) and cholesterol were found to act synergistically and predict primary acute myocardial infarction in Swedish males. A cholesterol level above 6.5 mmol/l increased the risk of acute myocardial infarction if the Lp(a) level was above 200 mg/l. The plasma apo A-I level was a protective factor. In the other recent case-control study, an Lp(a) level above 500 mg/l was a highly significant risk factor in Black and White US women with myocardial infarction or advanced coronary artery disease in addition to low density lipoprotein cholesterol levels above 130 mg/dl. A high apo A-I level was a protective factor. In these studies no other factors tested reached significance in multivariate logistic regression analysis. A hypothetical association between high Lp(a) levels and intracellular infection with Chlamydia pneumoniae is discussed. The results suggest that the Lp(a) level is useful in identifying high-risk individuals. Lowering low density lipoprotein cholesterol below 100 mg/dl (<2.6 mmol/l) seems to be most important in both males and females with high-risk Lp(a) levels.     

Methods for estimating HIV prevalence: A comparison of extrapolation from surveys on infection rate and risk behaviour with back-calculation for the Netherlands

SUBJECTS AND METHODS: 227 of subjects with a 2-hour plasma glucose concentration of 120-199 mg/dl were selected from 413 participants who had two or more 75 g OGTT in health examinations from 1987-1995. From these subjects we established 8 groups according to initial 2-hour plasma glucose concentration 120-199 mg/dl stratified by 10 mg/dl, and calculated the total percentages of participants whose 2-hour plasma glucose concentration reached 200 mg/dl or greater over a 1-8 years (2.7 +/- 1.7 years, mean +/- SD) observation period. In 36 subjects who were tested annually over a four year period (4 times), the mean values of their 4 values were analyzed for relationships to coefficients of variation of the 2-hour plasma glucose. RESULTS: By stratified groups (from lowest to highest) of those with an initial plasma glucose concentration of 120-159 mg/dl, 7.4%, 12.1%, 16.1%, and 15.0% attained values of 200 mg/dl and higher, respectively in 1-8 years. On the other hand, 29.6%, 29.6%, 39.1%, and 47.4% of those with an initial plasma glucose concentration of 160-199 mg/dl moved to a diabetic type after 1-8 years, respectively. The percentages of those who ended up with levels of 200 mg/dl and greater at 2-hours tended to increase in subjects whose initial 2-hour plasma glucose concentration was over 160 mg/dl in comparison with patients below that initial level. CONCLUSIONS: From these results, it appears that subjects with 160-199 mg/dl 2-hour glucose concentration, which is considered a borderline status, are at high risk for future abnormal levels (> 200 mg/dl at 2-hours) and should be managed as a high risk level group for prevention of diabetes.     

Sib-pair analysis detects elevated Lp(a) levels and large variation of Lp(a) concentration in subjects with familial defective ApoB

Whether or not Lp(a) plasma levels are affected by the apoB R3500Q mutation, which causes Familial Defective apoB (FDB), is still a matter of debate. We have analyzed 300 family members of 13 unrelated Dutch index patients for the apoB mutation and the apolipoprotein(a) [apo(a)] genotype. Total cholesterol, LDL-cholesterol, and lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] concentrations were determined in 85 FDB heterozygotes and 106 non-FDB relatives. Mean LDL levels were significantly elevated in FDB subjects compared to non-FDB relatives (P < 0.001). Median Lp(a) levels were not different between FDB subjects and their non-FDB relatives. In contrast, sib-pair analysis demonstrated a significant effect of the FDB status on Lp(a) levels. In sib pairs identical by descent for apo(a) alleles but discordant for the FDB mutation (n = 11) each sib with FDB had a higher Lp(a) level than the corresponding non-FDB sib. Further, all possible sib pairs (n = 105) were grouped into three categories according to the absence/presence of the apoB R3500Q mutation in one or both subjects of a sib pair. The variability of differences in Lp(a) levels within the sib pairs increased with the number (0, 1, and 2) of FDB subjects present in the sib pair. This suggests that the FDB status increases Lp(a) level and variability, and that apoB may be a variability gene for Lp(a) levels in plasma.     

The role of nitric oxide in vascular biology and pathobiology

Brain natriuretic peptide (BNP) is a novel cardiac hormone secreted predominantly from the ventricle. We examined the plasma levels of BNP and atrial natriuretic peptide (ANP) in 13 patients with aortic stenosis undergoing corrective surgery. Preoperative plasma BNP and ANP levels correlated highly with preoperative left ventricular end-systolic wall stress (ESS) (r = 0.96, p < 0.0001 and r = 0.95, p < 0.0001, respectively). Moreover, between preoperative and late postoperative states, the difference of the plasma levels of BNP and ANP correlated with the difference of ESS. In two patients with elevated ESS and quite high preoperative plasma BNP (> 1000 pg/ml), rapid decrease of the plasma level after operation was observed. These results suggest that synthesis and secretion of BNP and ANP are stimulated by the increase of left ventricular end-systolic wall stress in patients with aortic stenosis.     

Plasma lipoprotein distribution of apoC-III in normolipidemic and hypertriglyceridemic subjects: comparison of the apoC-III to apoE ratio in different lipoprotein fractions

In order to assess the relationship between plasma accumulation of triglyceride-rich lipoproteins (TRL) and lipoprotein levels of apoC-III and apoE, we have measured apoC-III and apoE in lipoproteins separated according to size (by automated gel filtration chromatography) from plasma of normolipidemic subjects (plasma triglyceride (TG): 0.84 +/- 0.10 mmol/l; mean +/- SE, n = 8), and from type III (n = 8) and type IV (n = 8) hyperlipoproteinemic patients, matched for plasma TG (5.76 +/- 0.62 v 5.55 +/- 0.45 mmol/l, resp.). Total plasma apoC-III concentration was similar in type III and type IV patients (33.1 +/- 3.4 v 37.6 +/- 4.4 mg/dl, respectively), but was significantly increased compared to normolipidemic controls (10.0 +/- 1.0 mg/dl, P < 0.001). TRL apoC-III was lower and high density lipoprotein (HDL) apoC-III was significantly higher in type III versus type IV subjects (14.8 +/- 3.2 vs. 22.8 +/- 3.0 mg/dl, P < 0.05; 8.3 +/- 1.0 vs. 5.2 +/- 0.5 mg/dl, P < 0.05). Plasma concentration of apoC-III in lipoproteins that eluted between TRL and HDL (intermediate-sized lipoproteins, ISL) was similar in the two hypertriglyceridemic groups (10.1 +/- 1.3 vs. 9.7 +/- 1.6 mg/dl), but was significantly higher (P< 0.05) than controls (2.2 +/- 0.3 mg/dl). TRL, ISL, and HDL apoE concentrations were significantly higher in type III versus type IV subjects (P < 0.05). All lipoprotein fractions in type III patients were characterized by lower apoC-III to apoE ratios. In contrast, the TRL apoC-III to apoE ratio of type IV patients was similar and the ISL apoC-III to apoE ratio was significantly higher, compared to normolipidemic individuals. These results indicate that compared to normolipidemic individuals, remnant-like lipoproteins in the ISL fraction of type IV patients are enriched in apoC-III relative to apoE, whereas those of type III patients are enriched in apoE relative to apoC-III.     

Do increased lipoprotein(a) levels in euthyroid autoimmune thyroid diseases predict an increased risk of arteriosclerosis?

Elevated serum levels of lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] represent an independent risk factor in the development of arteriosclerosis and coronary heart disease. In overt but also in subclinical hypothyroidism a reversible increase of Lp(a) occurs. We compared Lp(a) serum levels, cholesterol, triglyceride, HDL- and LDL-cholesterol in 19 hypothyroid patients prior to and following the state of euthyroidism (group 1). On the other hand in group 2 we investigated 20 euthyroid patients having elevated thyroid antibodies as against 50 euthyroid normolipemic control subjects without detectable thyroid antibodies. Group 1: The elevated Lp(a) serum levels of the hypothyroid patients decreased significantly in the euthyroid state (37.9 +/- 8.24 vs. 28.1 +/- 6.13 mg/dl, mean +/- SEM). Group 2: The mean Lp(a) serum levels of the patients with increased thyroid antibodies were significantly higher than those of the control group (24.8 +- 5.78 vs. 9.6 +/- 1.56 mg/dl, mean +/- SEM). In other parameters of lipid metabolism and thyroidal function no significant differences between both groups could be seen. The question arises whether such isolated Lp(a) elevation will lead to an increased arteriosclerotic risk. To minimize this possible risk regular controls of thyroid function should be carried out in euthyroid patients with elevated thyroid antibodies. In this way hypothyroidism may be detected and treated at an early stage.     

Endovascular stent graft placement for patients with aortic aneurysm and end-organ dysfunction

Endovascular stent grafts (ESGs) for the treatment of aortic aneurysm is becoming popular because it is less invasiveness for the patient. This new modality seems to be especially useful for treating high risk patients, such as those with end-organ dysfunction. In this study we retrospectively analyzed the results of ESG placement for patients with renal or hepatic dysfunction. From January 1996 to December 1997, six patients with end-organ dysfunction (two with descending thoracic aneurysm and four with abdominal aneurysm) underwent ESG placement. Five of these patients had renal dysfunction, with serum creatinine levels of 2.0 mg/dl or greater, and the remaining patient had hepatic dysfunction with a prothrombin time less than 60%. One of the patients also had severe atherosclerotic disease with a history of multiple brain infarctions. All the patients received custom made endovascular spiral Z stents covered with a woven Dacron (DuPont Co., Wilmington, DE) graft, which was delivered via a femoral artery under local anesthesia. None of the patients showed significant changes in renal or hepatic function after the procedure. None of the five patients with renal dysfunction needed hemodialysis after ESG placement, although the mean preoperative level of serum creatinine and blood urea nitrogen was 3.4 mg/dl and 42.0 mg/ dl, respectively. All the patients left the recovery room on postoperative day 1. These results indicated that endovascular stent graft placement is extremely useful in the treatment of aortic aneurysm patients with end-organ dysfunction.