An associative process maintains reflex facilitation of the unconditioned nictitating membrane response during the early stages of training.

The presentation of a neutral or conditioned stimulus (CS) at an appropriate interval prior to the presentation of a corneal airpuff or a paraorbital shock (unconditioned stimulus, US) can facilitate the amplitude of the unconditioned nictitating membrane (NM) response in rabbits. In two experiments, it was demonstrated that an associative process mediates the maintenance of that facilitation during repeated CS–US pairings. Although CS-alone presentations produced a substantial decrease in the amount of reflex facilitation in animals not pretrained with the CS, pretraining that consisted of paired CS–US presentations prevented that decrease when CS-alone presentations were subsequently given. Conditioned facilitation of the unconditioned response occurred very rapidly (within 5–22 trials in these experiments) and long before the appearance of overt conditioned responses to the CS. In addition, it was demonstrated that conditioned facilitation can be relatively specific to the tonal frequency of the CS. These results indicate the first sign of conditioning of the NM response is exhibited in the amplitude of the unconditioned response. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2010 APA, all rights reserved)     

Blocking of a CS–US association by a US–US association.

Pigeons were autoshaped with a keylight as the conditioned stimulus (CS) and food as the unconditioned stimulus (US). Preexposure to repeated US presentations was followed by training sessions in which a single US preceded a single CS–US pairing. Preexposure blocked conditioning to the CS only when the interval between the prior US and the US in the US–CS pairing (critical interval) was equal to the US–US interval in preexposure. Blocking was examined as a function of the length of the critical interval and the amount of preexposure. The hypothesis that blocking occurs because prior US predicts the time of arrival of the US in the CS–US pairing was supported by a reduction in blocking when USs separated by intervals longer than the critical interval were added to preexposure sessions. Certain other interpretations of these results were tested and rejected. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2010 APA, all rights reserved)     

Effects of contingency violations on the extinction of a conditioned fear inhibitor and a conditioned fear excitor.

In 4 experiments, 192 male Holtzman and Sprague-Dawley rats were used in a conditioned-suppression paradigm to assess the effects of contingency variations on responding to a conditioned stimulus (CS) inhibitor (CS–) and a conditioned stimulus excitor (CS+). In Exp I, various unconditioned stimulus/stimuli (UCS) frequencies were equated across the presence and absence of a CS– in the context of either background cues (continuous-trial procedure) or an explicit neutral event (discrete-trial procedure). With both procedures, a CS-alone treatment enhanced inhibition, whereas treatments involving 50 or 100% reinforcement for the CS– eliminated inhibition without conditioning excitation to that CS. The latter outcome also occurred in Exp II, with discrete-trial training equating considerably reduced UCS frequencies for the presence and absence of the CS–. In further evidence that inhibition was eliminated without conditioning excitation to the CS–, Exp III showed that a novel CS did not acquire excitation when 25, 50, or 100% reinforcement was equated across the presence and absence of that CS in the context of a discrete-trial event. Using the procedures of Exp I, Exp IV showed that a CS+ was extinguished by a CS-alone treatment but was substantially maintained by treatments involving 50 or 100% uncorrelated reinforcement. These effects for a CS+ and a CS– implicate CS–UCS contiguity, rather than contingency, as the factor determining the extinction of a CS. (33 ref) (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2010 APA, all rights reserved)     

Noradrenaline and sensory preconditioning in the rat.

Two experiments investigated the effect of noradrenaline (NA) depletion following intraperitoneal administration of the neurotoxin N-2-chloroethyl-N-ethyl-2-bromobenzylamine ({dsp4}[50 mg/kg]) on sensory preconditioning in male Sprague-Dawley rats. For sensory preconditioning, a saccharin taste conditioned stimulus (CS?) and a special type of drinking bottle (noisy bottle) were paired during Phase 1. During Phase 2, the noisy bottle (CS?) was paired with lithium chloride, and during Phase 3 the aversion to saccharin (CS?) was tested in saccharin preference tests. {dsp4} treatment disrupted Ss' ability to form sensory preconditioning, and this effect could not be explained on the basis of enhanced neophobia, stimulus generalization, or a deficit in 1st-order conditioning in {dsp4}-treated Ss. Findings are discussed in relation to issues of associative learning such as contextual control of latent inhibition and extinction. Data suggest that NA-depleted rats fail to form associations between the CS? and CS? during sensory preconditioning and are consisitent with other data from compound conditioning experiments on the functional role of NA in learning and memory. (53 ref) (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2010 APA, all rights reserved)     

Variations in intensity, interstimulus interval, and interval between preconditioning CS exposures and conditioning with rats.

Investigated the relationship between preconditioning exposure to a stimulus later employed in conditioning as a CS and suppression of a licking response in the presence of that stimulus, in 2 experiments with a total of 216 male albino Sprague-Dawley rats. In Exp. I, a direct relationship was found between intensity of preconditioning stimulus and magnitude of suppression reduction. There was also evidence for the effects of stimulus intensity during conditioning and the operation of generalization decrement when conditioning and test stimulus intensities were not the same. Exp. II showed that preconditioning CS exposure reduced suppression to the test CS on the 1st test trial, regardless of interval between preconditioning exposures or preexposure and conditioning. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2010 APA, all rights reserved)     

Comparative electrophysiologic findings between responders and nonresponders to class III antiarrhythmic drugs among patients with ventricular tachyarrhythmia

Rabbits received conditional discrimination training using contextual stimuli to set the occasion for stimulus pairings during eyelid conditioning. Specifically, animals were exposed to either the presence or the absence of an oscillating chamber light throughout the intertrial interval (50 +/- 10 s). For half the animals, this light signaled paired presentations of a discrete tone conditioned stimulus (CS) and air puff unconditioned stimulus (US) while darkness signaled presentations of only the tone CS. The remaining animals experienced the opposite contextual relationship to the conditioning stimuli. These trial types occurred pseudo-randomly across a session, with all transitions between contextual settings (i.e., light or dark) taking place immediately at the CS-US offset. Under these conditions, animals successfully utilized the contextual stimuli as conditional cues for differential responding to the shared CS. Moreover, both light and dark were equally effective as discriminative stimuli. A subset of animals received further training in which the contextual contingency was removed by restricting all conditioning to the CS-alone context. Without the contingency in place, subsequent CS presentations (paired and CS-alone) evoked equivalent conditioned responding across three sessions of training. Following the reinstatement of the contextual contingencies, discriminatory responding was immediately observed and returned to previous levels within three sessions. Finally, animals appeared to use the static representation of the conditional cue, rather than the phasic transition between cues, for discriminatory responding. These findings are discussed in terms of current neurobiological models of eyelid conditioning.     

Classical conditioning with electrical stimulation of cerebellum as both conditioned and unconditioned stimulus.

Stimulating electrodes were implanted in rabbit cerebellum, providing an electrical conditioned stimulus (CS) activating cortical parallel fibers and thence Purkinje and other cells, and an electrical unconditioned stimulus (US) activating underlying white matter and eliciting unconditioned responses. Paired CS-US presentations led to the development of conditioned responses, which showed extinction following CS-alone trials and reacquisition with significant savings on reinstatement of paired trials. Increased local excitability as a result of paired training (but not following unpaired stimulus presentations) was observed in cerebellar cortex, as manifested in substantial decreases in CS threshold for response elicitation in all subjects. This preparation offers a model for the study of plastic neuronal interactions within cerebellar networks critically involved in associative learning. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2010 APA, all rights reserved)     

Effects of UCS preexposure on excitatory and inhibitory rabbit eyelid conditioning: An associative effect of conditioned contextual stimuli.

Preconditioning experience with the UCS retards subsequent excitatory conditioning. Three experiments demonstrated that the UCS retardation effect is attenuated by associative manipulations of contextual stimuli of the UCS preexposure environment. The UCS retardation effect was reduced by (a) altering contextual stimuli between preexposure and conditioning (Exp I, 49 New Zealand male rabbits; Exp II, 28 Ss); and (b) latently inhibiting contextual stimuli subsequent to UCS (Exp III, 36 Ss). Although UCS preexposure retarded excitatory conditioning, results of Exp IV (48 Ss) demonstrated that UCS preexposure facilitated inhibitory conditioning. Overall findings indicate that an association between contextual stimuli and preexposed UCS contributes to the effects of preconditioning UCS experience on subsequent learning. (48 ref) (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2010 APA, all rights reserved)     

Classical conditioning of the rabbit eyelid response with a mossy-fiber stimulation CS: I. Pontine nuclei and middle cerebellar peduncle stimulation.

The nictitating membrane/eyelid responses of 18 rabbits were classically conditioned using cerebellar mossy-fiber stimulation as a conditioned stimulus (CS) and air puff as an unconditioned stimulus (US). The dorsolateral, lateral, and medial pontine nuclei and the middle cerebellar penduncle were effective stimulation-CS sites for training. In one group of rabbits, robust conditioned eyelid responses were produced with paired trials and subsequently extinguished with CS-alone and explicitly unpaired presentation of the CS and US. In a second group of rabbits, no conditioned responses were evident for 4 days of unpaired CS and US presentations. Conditioned responses did develop, however, after paired training was begun. Lesions of the interpositus nucleus of the cerebellum completely abolished the conditioned responses of a third group of rabbits overtrained with the mossy-fiber CS and air-puff US. Results support studies that have demonstrated that the cerebellum is critically involved in acquisition and retention of simple learned responses and theories of cerebellar function which have proposed that mossy fibers supply critical "learning" input to the cerebellum for acquisition and retention of motor skills. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2010 APA, all rights reserved)     

Cingulate cortical coding of context-dependent latent inhibition.

Neuronal activity of the auditory thalamus, amygdala, cingulate cortex, and substantia nigra was recorded during the administration of a behavioral test for latent inhibition (LI) or the retardation of behavioral conditioning because of preexposure of the conditional stimulus (CS). Following CS preexposure, both the preexposed CS and a control CS predicted avoidable footshock. LI occurred as significantly fewer avoidance conditioned avoidance responses after the preexposed CS than after the control CS. Attenuation of neuronal responses to the preexposed CS, or neural LI, occurred in all monitored areas. One group of subjects (Oryctolagus cuniculus) then received context extinction, and additional groups experienced novel context exposure or handling. Context extinction enhanced behavioral responding to the preexposed CS, eliminating LI. Context extinction also eliminated cingulate cortical neural LI by enhancing posterior cingulate cortical responses to the preexposed CS and attenuating anterior cingulate cortical responses to the control CS. Present and past results are interpreted to indicate that LI is (a) a failure of response retrieval and/or expression mediated by interfering CS-context associations and (b) a product of interactions of the posterior cingulate cortex and the hippocampus. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2010 APA, all rights reserved)     

Mechanisms of Pavlovian conditioning: Role of protection from habituation in spinal conditioning.

Conditioned antinociception can be established in spinal rats by pairing stimulation to one hind leg (the conditioned stimulus [CS]) with an intense tailshock (the unconditioned stimulus [US]). After this training, the paired CS (CS+) elicits greater antinociception on the tail-flick test than a CS that was explicitly unpaired (CS–). Five experiments are reported that suggest that this effect reflects protection from habituation. Experiment 1 showed that the CS (legshock) induces antinociception before training. Presenting the CS alone weakened (habituated) its antinociceptive impact (Experiment 2). Less habituation was observed when the CS was paired with the US (Experiment 3). Decreasing habituation to the CS– (by increasing the interval between trials) and facilitating habituation to the CS+ (by increasing the number of trials) effectively eliminated the CS+/CS– difference (Experiments 4 and 5). (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2010 APA, all rights reserved)     

An immediate-shock freezing deficit with discrete cues: A possible role for unconditioned stimulus processing mechanisms.

Five experiments with C57BL/6 mice (Mus musculus) investigated whether failures in shock processing might contribute to deficits in freezing that occur after an animal receives a shock immediately on exposure to a conditioning context. Experiment 1 found that more contextual freezing resulted from delayed shocks than from immediate shocks across 4 shock intensities. Experiment 2 extended the immediate-shock freezing deficit to discrete stimuli. Experiment 3 found that preexposure to the to-be-conditioned cue did not facilitate immediate cued conditioning. Experiment 4 found that context preexposure enhanced context-evoked fear after an immediate shock. Experiment 5 found that context preexposure also enhanced immediate cued conditioning. These findings are problematic for current theories of the immediate-shock freezing deficit that focus exclusively on processing of the conditioned stimulus, and they suggest that failures in shock processing may contribute to the deficit. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2010 APA, all rights reserved)     

Novel factors contributing to the expression of latent inhibition.

Behavioral and neural correlates of latent inhibition (LI) during eyeblink conditioning were studied in 2 experiments. In Experiment 1, rabbits (Oryctolagus cuniculus) were conditioned after 8 days of tone conditioned stimulus (CS) presentations or 8 days of context-alone experience. LI was seen in the CS-preexposed rabbits when a relatively intense (5 psi) airpuff unconditioned stimulus was paired with the CS. In Experiment 2, rabbits were given 0, 4, or 8 days of CS preexposures or context-alone experience. Hippocampal activity was monitored from the 8-day CS- or context-exposure rabbits. The LI effect was seen only in rabbits given 4 days of CS preexposure, thus suggesting that LI depended largely on the rate of acquisition in the context-preexposed control group. The neural recordings showed that the hippocampus was sensitive to the relative novelty of the stimuli and the overall context, regardless of whether exposure to stimuli and context promoted LI. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2010 APA, all rights reserved)     

Outcome Pre- and Postexposure Effects: Retention Interval Interacts With Primacy and Recency.

Effects of outcome-alone pretraining and posttraining exposure were investigated in conditioned suppression experiments conducted within a sensory preconditioning preparation with rats. Experiment 1 found that interference by outcome postexposure was stronger than that by outcome preexposure, suggesting a recency effect. Experiment 2 found that after a long retention interval, outcome preexposure produced more interference than outcome postexposure, suggesting a shift from recency to primacy with increasing retention interval. Experiment 3 showed that presentation of a priming stimulus that had been embedded within the earlier phase of treatment also caused a shift from recency to primacy. These results suggest that, at least in a sensory preconditioning paradigm, retrievability of outcome-alone exposure memory is an important determinant of any outcome-alone exposure effect. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2010 APA, all rights reserved)     

Associative effects of US preexposure: Modulation of conditioned responding by an excitatory training context.

Conducted 2 experiments with 120 naive Sprague-Dawley rats to examine factors that contribute to retarded emergence of conditioned responding to a conditioned stimulus/stimuli (CS) trained in a context in which unsignaled unconditioned stimulus/stimuli (UCS) had previously been administered. In both experiments, water-deprived Ss were used in a conditioned lick suppression task to measure the conditioned response (CR) elicitation potential of the CS and the training context. From Exp I, it was determined that nonreinforced exposure to the excitatory context after UCS preexposure and prior to CS–UCS pairings in that context eliminated the CR deficit observed on a subsequent test of the CS. From Exp II, it was determined that the recovery induced by contextual deflation after CS training was specific to deflation of the context in which the CS was trained as opposed to another excitatory context. (28 ref) (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2010 APA, all rights reserved)     

Decremental effects of context exposure following delay eyeblink conditioning in rabbits.

The conditioning context arises from the relatively static features of the training environment. In rabbit eyeblink conditioning, procedures that retard acquisition (conditioned stimulus [CS] preexposure, unconditioned stimulus preexposure, blocking manipulations) are attenuated by context changes. In this article the authors investigate the effect of context exposure after initial delay conditioning. After conditioned responses (CRs) were established, one group received 6 sessions of context exposure, whereas control groups either remained in their home cages or received exposure to handling and a novel context. Thereafter, all groups received CS-alone testing. The expression of CRs was substantially reduced following context exposure relative to any retention loss in the home-cage control. Exposure to handling and a novel context facilitated the CRs rather than reducing them. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2010 APA, all rights reserved)     

Cerebellar stimulation as an unconditioned stimulus in classical conditioning.

Implanted rabbits with chronic stimulating electrodes in white matter underlying lobule HVI of the cerebellar cortex. Stimulation elicited movements of the face or neck and, when paired with a tone CS, produced learning comparable to that seen with peripheral unconditioned stimulus/stimuli (UCS). CS-alone trials produced extinction. Reinstatement of paired trials produced reacquisition with savings. Additional groups received either explicitly or randomly unpaired CS–UCS trials before paired conditioning. Low-frequency responding during these sessions indicated that the paired training results were associative and not due to pseudoconditioning or sensitization. Explicitly unpaired sessions retarded learning on subsequent paired trials compared with groups that received either randomly unpaired or no CS–UCS preexposure. These results are interpreted in terms of the role of the cerebellum and associated pathways in classical conditioning of motor responses. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2010 APA, all rights reserved)     

Additional exposures to a compound of two preexposed stimuli deepen latent inhibition.

The present experiments studied the role of error correction mechanisms in the latent inhibition of conditioned fear responses by conditioned stimulus (CS) preexposure. They demonstrated that a preexposed CS subjected to additional exposures in compound with either another preexposed stimulus or a novel stimulus was more latently inhibited than a preexposed CS which received additional exposures in isolation. They also showed that a preexposed CS subjected to additional exposures in compound with another preexposed stimulus was more latently inhibited than a preexposed CS given additional exposures in compound with a novel stimulus. These results were discussed in terms of the Hall–Rodriguez (2010) model of latent inhibition. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2011 APA, all rights reserved)     

The US-Preexposure Effect in Lithium-Induced Flavor-Aversion Conditioning Is a Consequence of Blocking by Injection Cues.

In 2 experiments, rats received flavor-aversion conditioning in which the unconditioned stimulus (US) was an orally consumed solution of lithium chloride (LiCl). The resulting aversion was not attenuated by giving preexposure to injections of LiCl, although such preexposure did attenuate aversions established using injected LiCl as the US (Experiment 1). This outcome suggests that blocking by injection-related cues is responsible for the US-preexposure effect observed in this situation. Experiment 2 confirmed this interpretation by showing that presenting such cues (by giving an injection of saline) at the time that the LiCl was drunk resulted in an attenuation of conditioning in animals preexposed to injections of LiCl. The US-preexposure effect obtained in these experiments can be explained solely in terms of blocking by injection cues, although other mechanisms may contribute to the effect seen in other flavor-aversion paradigms. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2010 APA, all rights reserved)     

Conditioning the unconditioned response: Modification of the rabbit's (Oryctolagus cuniculus) unconditioned nictitating membrane response.

Conditioning-specific reflex modification (CRM) occurs when classical conditioning modifies responding to a unconditioned stimulus/stimuli (UCS) in the absence of a conditioned stimulus (CS). Three experiments monitored rabbit (Oryctolagus cuniculus) nictitating membrane unconditioned responses to 5 intensities and 4 durations of periorbital electrical stimulation before and after CS or UCS manipulation. CRM occurred after 12 days of CS-UCS pairings but not following unpaired CS/UCS presentations or restraint. CRM survived CS-alone and CS/UCS-unpaired extinction of the conditioned response (CR) but not presentations of the UCS alone, although CRs remained intact. Thus, CRs could be weakened without eliminating CRM and CRM could be weakened without eliminating CRs. Data indicate CRM is a reliable, associative effect that is more than a generalized CR and may not be explained by habituation, stimulus generalization, contextual conditioning, or bidirectional conditioning. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2010 APA, all rights reserved)