Combined heat and power systems with dual power generation units and thermal storage

The objective of this paper is to study the performance of a combined heat and power (CHP) system that uses two power generation units (PGU). In addition, the effect of thermal energy storage is evaluated for the proposed dual‐PGU CHP configuration (D‐CHP). Two scenarios are evaluated in this paper. In the first scenario, one PGU operates at base‐loading condition, while the second PGU operates following the electric load. In the second scenario, one PGU operates at base‐loading condition, while the second PGU operates following the thermal load. The D‐CHP system is modeled for the same building in four different locations to account for variation of the electric and thermal loads due to weather data. The D‐CHP system results are compared with the reference building by using conventional technology to determine the benefits of this proposed system in terms of operational cost and carbon dioxide emissions. The D‐CHP system results, with and without thermal storage, are also compared with that of single‐PGU CHP systems operating following the electric load (FEL), following the thermal load (FTL), and base‐loaded (BL). Results indicate that the D‐CHP system operating either FEL or FTL in general provides better results than a single‐PGU CHP system operating FEL, FTL, or BL. The addition of thermal storage enhances the potential benefits from D‐CHP system operation in terms of operational cost savings and emissions savings. Copyright © 2013 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.     

Evaluation of combined heat and power (CHP) systems performance with dual power generation units for different building configurations

This paper evaluates the economic, energetic, and environmental feasibility of using two power generation units (PGUs) to operate a combined heat and power (CHP) system. Several benchmark buildings developed by the Department of Energy simulated using the weather data for Chicago, IL, are used to analyze the proposed configuration. This location has been selected because it usually provides favorable CHP system conditions in terms of cost and emission reduction. For the proposed configuration, one PGU is operated at base load to satisfy part of the electricity building requirements, whereas the other is used to satisfy the remaining electricity requirement operating following the electric load. The dual‐PGU CHP configuration (D‐CHP) is modeled for four different scenarios to determine the optimum operating range for the selected benchmark buildings. The dual‐PGU scenario is compared with the reference building using conventional technology to determine the benefits of this proposed system in terms of operational cost, primary energy reduction, and carbon dioxide emissions. The D‐CHP system results are also compared with a CHP system operating following the electric load (FEL) and base‐loaded CHP system. For three of the selected buildings, the proposed D‐CHP system provides comparable or greater savings in operating cost, primary energy consumption, and carbon dioxide emissions than the optimized conditions for base loading and FEL. In addition, the effect of operating the D‐CHP system only during certain months of the year on the overall operational cost is also evaluated. Results indicate that not operating the D‐CHP system for the months where the thermal load is too low is beneficial for the overall system performance. Copyright © 2012 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.     

Evaluation of a base‐loaded combined heating and power system with thermal storage for different small building applications

The objective of this paper is to demonstrate the advantages of using a combined heating and power (CHP) system operating at full load to satisfy a fraction of the facility electric load, that is, a base load. In addition, the effect of using thermal storage during the CHP system operation (CHP‐TS) is evaluated. A small office building and a restaurant with the same floor area, in Chicago, IL, and Hartford, CT, were used to evaluate the base‐loaded CHP and CHP‐TS operation based on operational cost, primary energy consumption (PEC), and carbon dioxide emissions (CDEs). Results indicate that, in general, the use of thermal storage is beneficial for the CHP system operation because it reduces cost, PEC, and CDEs compared with a CHP with no thermal storage. The CHP and CHP‐TS operation is more beneficial for a restaurant than for a small office building for the evaluated cities, which clearly indicates the effect of the thermal load on the CHP system performance. Copyright © 2011 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.     

A review on energy,economical, and environmental benefits of the use of CHP systems for small commercial buildings for the North American climate

The use of combined heating and power (CHP) systems to produce both electricity and heat is increasing rapidly due to their high potential of reducing primary energy consumption (PEC), cost, and emissions in domestic, commercial, and industrial applications. In addition to producing both electricity and heat, CHP systems can be coupled with vapor compression systems to provide cooling. This paper analyzes a natural gas engine CHP system together with a vapor compression system for different American climate zones. Performance is measured in terms of operational costs, PEC, and carbon dioxide emissions as a percent of a reference building. The objective of this paper is to compare the performance of a CHP system operating 24 h a day with a system that only operates during typical office hours. Furthermore, the system is optimized based on reducing PEC, minimizing costs, and reducing emissions. In addition, the benefits of CHP systems based on the Energy Star program and the Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design (LEED) program are presented. Results show that, in general, it is more beneficial to operate the CHP system during typical office hours than to operate the system 24 h a day. Also, the CHP system performance strongly depends on the location where it is installed. In addition to reductions in cost, primary energy, and emissions, CHP systems can help achieve the Energy Star label for commercial office buildings and help obtain LEED points that go toward achieving LEED certification status. Copyright © 2009 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.     

Performance analysis of CCHP and CHP systems operating following the thermal and electric load

Heating and cooling energy requirements for buildings are usually supplied by separated systems such as furnaces or boilers for heating, and vapor compression systems for cooling. For these types of buildings, the use of combined cooling, heating, and power (CCHP) systems or combined heating and power (CHP) systems are an alternative for energy savings. Different researchers have claimed that the use of CCHP and CHP systems reduces the energy consumption related to transmission and distribution of energy. However, most of these analyses are based on reduction of operating cost without measuring the actual energy use and emissions reduction. The objective of this study is to analyze the performance of CCHP and CHP systems operating following the electric load (FEL) and operating following the thermal load (FTL), based on primary energy consumption (PEC), operation cost, and carbon dioxide emissions (CDE) for different climate conditions. Results show that CCHP and CHP systems operated FTL reduce the PEC for all the evaluated cities. On the other hand, CHP systems operated FEL always increases the PEC. The only operation mode that reduces PEC and CDE while reducing the cost is CHP‐FTL. Copyright © 2009 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.     

Cost targets for domestic fuel cell CHP

Fuel cells have the potential to reduce domestic energy bills by providing both heat and power at the point of use, generating high value electricity from a low cost fuel. However, the cost of installing the fuel cell must be sufficiently low to be recovered by the savings made over its lifetime. A computer simulation is used to estimate the savings and cost targets for fuel cell CHP systems.     

Spark spread – A screening parameter for combined heating and power systems

Combined heating and power (CHP) systems may be considered for installation if they produce savings over conventional systems with separate heating and power. For a CHP system with a natural gas engine as the prime mover, the difference between the price of natural gas and the price of purchased electricity, called spark spread, is an indicator as to whether a CHP system might be considered or not. The objective of this paper is to develop a detailed model, based on the spark spread, that compares the electrical energy and heat energy produced by a CHP system against the same amounts of energy produced by a traditional, or separate heating and power (SHP) system that purchases electricity from the grid. An expression for the spark spread based on the cost of the fuel and some of the CHP system efficiencies is presented in this paper as well as an expression for the payback period for a given capital cost and spark spread. The developed expressions allow determining the required spark spread for a CHP system to produce a net operational savings over the SHP in terms of the performance of system components. Results indicate that the spark spread which might indicate favorable payback varies based on the efficiencies of the CHP system components and the desired payback period. In addition, a new expression for calculating the payback period for a CHP system based on the CHP system capital cost per unit of power output and fuel cost is proposed.     

Analysis of cooling,heating, and power systems based on site energy consumption

Feasibility of cooling, heating, and power systems frequently is based on economic considerations such as energy prices. However, a most adequate feasibility of CHP systems must be based on energy consumption followed by economic considerations. CHP systems designs must yield economical savings, but more importantly must yield real energy savings based on the best energy performance. For CHP systems, energy savings is related to primary energy and not to site energy. This paper presents a mathematical analysis demonstrating that CHP systems increase the site energy consumption (SEC). Increasing the SEC could yield misleading results in the economic feasibility of CHP systems. Three different operation modes are evaluated: (a) cooling, heating, and power; (b) heating and power; and (c) cooling and power, to represent the operation of the system throughout the year. Results show that CHP systems increase site energy consumption; therefore primary energy consumption (PEC) should be used instead of SEC when designing CHP systems.     

Evaluation of the performance of combined cooling,heating, and power systems with dual power generation units

The benefits of using a combined cooling, heating, and power system with dual power generation units (D-CCHP) is examined in nine different U.S. locations. One power generation unit (PGU) is operated at base load while the other is operated following the electric load. The waste heat from both PGUs is used for heating and for cooling via an absorption chiller. The D-CCHP configuration is studied for a restaurant benchmark building, and its performance is quantified in terms of operational cost, primary energy consumption (PEC), and carbon dioxide emissions (CDE). Cost spark spread, PEC spark spread, and CDE spark spread are examined as performance indicators for the D-CCHP system. D-CCHP system performance correlates well with spark spreads, with higher spark spreads signifying greater savings through implementation of a D-CCHP system. A new parameter, thermal difference, is introduced to investigate the relative performance of a D-CCHP system compared to a dual PGU combined heat and power system (D-CHP). Thermal difference, together with spark spread, can explain the variation in savings of a D-CCHP system over a D-CHP system for each location. The effect of carbon credits on operational cost savings with respect to the reference case is shown for selected locations.     

Integrated waste-to-energy conversion and waste transportation within island communities

Usually in islands both primary energy sources and drinking water are missing. Additionally, municipal solid waste (MSW) must be managed avoiding exclusive use of landfills, which limits sustainable development. Power generation from MSW incineration contributes significantly to replacing energy produced from fossil fuels and to reduce overall emissions. A solution based on thermodynamics, environmental and economic analyses and 3D-GIS modelling for the afore-mentioned problems for Cape Verde is proposed. This model integrates waste transportation optimisation and incineration with energy recovery combining production of heat and power (CHP), the heat being used for drinking water production. The results show that extraction condensing steam turbines are more suitable when power production is a priority (5.0 MW with 4000 m³/d of drinking water), whereas back-pressure turbines yield 5540–6650 m³/d of drinking water with an additional power production of 3.3–4.7 MW. The environmental and economic assessment performed shows the feasibility of the proposed CHP solution, which brings a considerable reduction in net air emissions (1.6 kt), including a significant decrease in the greenhouse gas emissions (131 ktCO₂), and that the revenue from energy sales (€15 million) has potential to balance the incineration cost. Moreover, when terrain relief is accounted for in the route optimisation for minimum fuel consumption, savings up to 11% are obtained.     

超市热电联供系统余热利用及热电冷联供系统研究

通过建立数学模型对热电冷联供系统在超市中应用的可行性进行了分析。利用该模型对系统的节能效果、投资回收期、发动机组容量、等效满负荷运行时间等特性参数进行了研究，并对不同控制方式对系统性能的影响进行了讨论，为超市热电冷联供系统的方案优化提供了依据。     

Performance assessment of a Stirling engine plant for local micro‐cogeneration

In this paper, we evaluate the viability of a 9.5‐kW_e wooden pellet‐fueled Stirling engine‐based micro‐cogeneration plant as a substitute for small‐scale district heating. The district heating systems against which the micro‐cogeneration plant is compared are based either on a pellet‐fueled boiler or a ground‐source heat pump. The micro‐cogeneration and district heating plants are compared in terms of primary energy consumption, CO₂ emissions, and feasibility of the investment. The comparison also considers an optimally operated individual 0.7‐kW_e pellet‐fueled Stirling engine micro‐cogeneration system with exhaust gas heat recovery. The study is conducted in two different climates and contributes to the knowledge base by addressing: (i) hourly changes in the Finnish electricity generation mix; and (ii) uncertainty related to what systems are used as reference and the treatment of displaced grid electricity. Our computational results suggest that when operated at constant power, the 9.5‐kW_e Stirling engine plant results in reduced annual primary energy use compared with any of the alternative systems. The results are not sensitive to climate or the energy efficiency or number of buildings. In comparison with the pellet‐fueled district heating plant, the annual use of primary energy and CO₂ emissions are reduced by a minimum of 25 and 19%, respectively. Owing to a significant displacement of grid electricity, the system's net primary energy consumption appears negative when the total built area served by the plant is less than 1200 m². On the economic side, the maximum investment cost threshold of a CHP‐based district heating system serving 10 houses or more can typically be positive when compared with oil and pellet systems, but negative when compared with a corresponding heat pump system. Copyright © 2010 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.     

Techno-economic analysis of using corn stover to supply heat and power to a corn ethanol plant – Part 2: Cost of heat and power generation systems

This paper presents a techno-economic analysis of corn stover fired process heating (PH) and the combined heat and power (CHP) generation systems for a typical corn ethanol plant (ethanol production capacity of 170 dam³). Discounted cash flow method was used to estimate both the capital and operating costs of each system and compared with the existing natural gas fired heating system. Environmental impact assessment of using corn stover, coal and natural gas in the heat and/or power generation systems was also evaluated. Coal fired process heating (PH) system had the lowest annual operating cost due to the low fuel cost, but had the highest environmental and human toxicity impacts. The proposed combined heat and power (CHP) generation system required about 137 Gg of corn stover to generate 9.5 MW of electricity and 52.3 MW of process heat with an overall CHP efficiency of 83.3%. Stover fired CHP system would generate an annual savings of 3.6 M$ with an payback period of 6 y. Economics of the coal fired CHP system was very attractive compared to the stover fired CHP system due to lower fuel cost. But the greenhouse gas emissions per Mg of fuel for the coal fired CHP system was 32 times higher than that of stover fired CHP system. Corn stover fired heat and power generation system for a corn ethanol plant can improve the net energy balance and add environmental benefits to the corn to ethanol biorefinery.     

Performance improvement of a 70 kWe natural gas combined heat and power (CHP) system

Combined heat and power is the simultaneous production of electricity and heat. CHP plants produce energy in an efficient way. A natural gas CHP system based on an internal combustion engine (ICE) is described, which has been set up at the Building Energy Research Center in Beijing, China. The system is composed of an ICE, a flue gas heat exchanger, a jacket water heat exchanger and other assistant facilities. The ICE generates power on-site, and the exhaust of the ICE is recovered by the flue gas heat exchanger, and the heat of the engine jacket is recovered by the jacket water heat exchanger to district heating system. In order to improve the performance of the system, an absorption heat pump (AHP) is adopted. The exhaust of the ICE drives the AHP to recover the sensible and latent heat step by step, and the temperature of the exhaust could be lowered to below 30 °C. In this paper, the performance of the new system were tested and compared with conventional cogeneration systems. The results show that the new CHP system could increase the heat utilization efficiency 10% compared to conventional systems in winter. All the results could be valuable references for the improvement of the CHP system.     

Combined heat and power economics

Combined heat and power is a joint product system generating electricity and heat, both relatively ‘non-storable’ commodities with temporally fluctuating demands. A ‘peak-load pricing’ model of the CHP system is developed to investigate the pricing and capacity decisions involved in this two market system. Various market structures are considered and the pricing implications investigated. The solutions have several interesting features, including possible peak-load switching. Where a decentralized CHP system exports electricity to the central system and operates in a local heat market, then, ceteris paribus, higher central electricity system prices imply lower optimal local heat market prices. In this latter case, the tariff offered by the electricity supply industry for CHP generated electricity has implications for investment and for pricing in the heat market — this tariff is therefore examined further. The case for marginal cost pricing is shown to have several attractive features.     

Analysis of advanced energy chain typologies

A method for estimating the effectiveness and CO₂ emissions of advanced energy conversion systems from primary to final energy is presented. A traditional condensing power plant for electricity production and a fuel boiler for heat production based on natural gas were used as the reference system. Several potentially better energy chains were analysed including CHP, tri‐generation, heat pumps and efficiency improvements in final energy use. All above solutions could provide clear reductions in primary energy use and emissions, in most cases tens of per cents, but the results are sensitive to operational conditions. In a heat pump system, the primary energy savings are considerable but emission reductions may turn out to be marginal or even negative whereas in co‐generation the emission reductions are higher than energy savings. Striving for high conversion efficiencies would ensure sustained benefits from the advanced energy chain typologies over the reference system even in the less favourable cases. Copyright © 2007 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.     

Energy and economic evaluation of cooling,heating, and power systems based on primary energy

Cooling, Heating, and Power (CHP) systems have the potential to make better use of fuels than other technologies because of their ability to increase the overall thermal energy efficiency. Feasibility of CHP systems is generally driven by economic savings. In addition, economic evaluation of CHP systems is based on site energy use and cost, which could lead to misleading conclusions about energy savings. Since energy savings from CHP systems only occurs in primary energy, the objective of this investigation is to demonstrate that feasibility of CHP systems should be performed based on primary energy savings followed by economic considerations. This paper also evaluates the effect of the power generation unit (PGU) efficiency over the primary energy reduction when a CHP system is utilized. The advantages of operating CHP systems under a primary energy operational strategy, such as the proposed Building Primary Energy Ratio (BPER) strategy, are also discussed. Results show that for some cases economic savings are attained without the corresponding primary energy savings. However, the use of the BPER operational strategy guarantees better energy performance regardless of economic savings. Regarding to the PGU efficiency, an increase of the efficiency reduces the primary energy use more than proportionally. For example, increasing the PGU efficiency from 0.25 to 0.35 (increase of 40%) can reduce the primary energy use from 5.4% to 16% (increase of 200%).     

Combined heat and power in industry and buildings

Combined heat and power (CHP) has huge potential to deliver energy savings and emissions reductions, and in many cases cost reductions too. But the market and regulatory framework is the key to delivering large-scale installations, and government has a poor record in delivering an appropriate framework.     

A novel hybrid heat-pipe solar collector/CHP system—Part II: theoretical and experimental investigations

A theoretical analysis has been carried out to investigate the thermodynamic and heat transfer characteristics of a hybrid heat pipe solar collector/CHP system based on the assumption that the system operates on a typical Rankine cycle. Experimental testing of the prototype was also carried out using two types of turbine units. The variation of refrigerant pressures and temperatures, hot water temperatures in the collector and boiler systems, as well as chill water temperatures were recorded. The results were used to estimate the heat from the boiler and the solar collectors, the electricity and hot water generation (indicated as kW energy) from the CHP operation and the gas consumption of the system. The modelling and experimental results were compared for the impulse-reaction turbine system, and a simple analysis of the energy and environmental benefits of the system was carried out. The analysis indicated that the proposed system would save primary energy of approximately 3150 kWh per annum compared to the conventional electricity and heating supply systems, and this would result in reduction in CO₂ emission of up to 600 tonnes per annum. The running cost of the proposed system would also be lower than conventional heating/power systems.     

The role of policy instruments for promoting combined heat and power production with low CO2 emissions in district heating systems

Policy instruments clearly influence the choice of production technologies and fuels in large energy systems, including district heating networks. Current Swedish policy instruments aim at promoting the use of biofuel in district heating systems, and at promoting electric power generation from renewable energy sources. However, there is increasing pressure to harmonize energy policy instruments within the EU. In addition, natural gas based combined cycle technology has emerged as the technology of choice in the power generation sector in the EU. This study aims at exploring the role of policy instruments for promoting the use of low CO₂ emissions fuels in high performance combined heat and power systems in the district heating sector. The paper presents the results of a case study for a Swedish district heating network where new large size natural gas combined cycle (NGCC) combined heat and power (CHP) is being built. Given the aim of current Swedish energy policy, it is assumed that it could be of interest in the future to integrate a biofuel gasifier to the CHP plant and co‐fire the gasified biofuel in the gas turbine unit, thereby reducing usage of fossil fuel. The goals of the study are to evaluate which policy instruments promote construction of the planned NGCC CHP unit, the technical performance of an integrated biofuelled pressurized gasifier with or without dryer on plant site, and which combination of policy instruments promote integration of a biofuel gasifier to the planned CHP unit. The power plant simulation program GateCycle was used for plant performance evaluation. The results show that current Swedish energy policy instruments favour investing in the NGCC CHP unit. The corresponding cost of electricity (COE) from the NGCC CHP unit is estimated at 253 SEK MWh^?1, which is lower than the reference power price of 284 SEK MWh^?1. Investing in the NGCC CHP unit is also shown to be attractive if a CO₂ trading system is implemented. If the value of tradable emission permits (TEP) in such as system is 250 SEK tonne^?1, COE is 353 SEK MWh^?1 compared to the reference power price of 384 SEK MWh^?1. It is possible to integrate a pressurized biofuel gasifier to the NGCC CHP plant without any major re‐design of the combined cycle provided that the maximum degree of co‐firing is limited to 27–38% (energy basis) product gas, depending on the design of the gasifier system. There are many parameters that affect the economic performance of an integrated biofuel gasifier for product gas co‐firing of a NGCC CHP plant. The premium value of the co‐generated renewable electricity and the value of TEPs are very important parameters. Assuming a future CO₂ trading system with a TEP value of 250 SEK tonne^?1 and a premium value of renewable electricity of 200 SEK MWh^?1 COE from a CHP plant with an integrated biofuelled gasifier could be 336 SEK MWh^?1, which is lower than both the reference market electric power price and COE for the plant operating on natural gas alone. Copyright © 2005 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.