Phase II trial of paclitaxel and carboplatin in the treatment of advanced urothelial carcinoma

PURPOSE: Both paclitaxel and carboplatin have single-agent activity against carcinoma of the urothelium. We evaluated the combination of paclitaxel and carboplatin in the treatment of advanced cancers of the urothelium. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with cancers of the urothelium who had no prior chemotherapy (prior adjuvant chemotherapy > 6 months allowed) were eligible for treatment. Eligibility requirements were performance status of 2 or less, creatinine level less than 2.0 mg/dL, granulocyte count (AGC) 1,500/microL or greater, platelet count 100,000/microL or greater, and total bilirubin level less than 1.5 mg/dL. Paclitaxel 200 mg/m2 followed by carboplatin (area under the curve [AUC] 5, Calvert formula) were administered every 21 days. Patients were evaluated for toxicity weekly and assessed for response every 6 weeks. RESULTS: Thirty-six patients were entered onto the study and 35 patients were assessable for response. A total of 184 cycles were administered (median, six cycles per patient). Nine patients required one dose reduction, and seven patients required two dose reductions for a nadir AGC less than 500/microL, with only one episode of febrile neutropenia and sepsis. Myalgias and arthralgias of grades 1 to 2 occurred in 16 patients and usually lasted 2 to 3 days after treatment. There were no treatment delays because of toxicity. There were 18 responses; seven complete responses (CRs) and 11 partial responses (PRs) (response rate 51.5%; 95% confidence interval, 35 to 68). Median response durations for CR and PR were 6 and 4 months, respectively. Overall median survival was 9.5 months. CONCLUSION: The combination of paclitaxel and carboplatin is an active and well-tolerated regimen for the treatment of advanced urothelial carcinoma. Because of the modest toxicity of this combination, paclitaxel and carboplatin should be considered for addition to other agents with activity in urothelial carcinomas.     

Phase I and pharmacologic study of 9-aminocamptothecin given by 72-hour infusion in adult cancer patients

PURPOSE: To conduct a phase I and pharmacologic study of the new topoisomerase I inhibitor, 9-aminocamptothecin (9-AC). PATIENTS AND MATERIALS: A 72-hour infusion of 9-AC was administered every 14 days to 48 solid-tumor patients at doses of 5 to 59 microg/m2/h without granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) and 47 to 74 microg/m2/h with G-CSF. RESULTS: Without G-CSF, two of eight patients who received 47 microg/m2/h had dose-limiting neutropenia in their initial cycle, as did both patients who received 59 microg/m2/h (with a platelet count < 25,000/microL in one). With G-CSF, zero of seven patients treated with 47 microg/m2/h had dose-limiting neutropenia in their first cycle, while dose-limiting neutropenia occurred in six of 14 patients (with platelet count < 25,000/microL in five) entered at 59 microg/m2/h. Among 39 patients entered at > or = 25 microg/m2/h 9-AC with or without G-CSF, fatigue, diarrhea, and nausea/vomiting of grade 2 severity ultimately occurred in 54%, 30%, and 38%, respectively, while grade 3 toxicities of each type occurred in 8% of patients. Steady-state 9-AC lactone concentration (Css) increased linearly from 0.89 to 10.6 nmol/L, and correlated strongly with leukopenia ( r = .85). CONCLUSION: The recommended phase II dose of 9-AC given by 72-hour infusion every 2 weeks is 35 microg/m2/h without G-CSF or 47 microg/m2/h with G-CSF support. Dose escalation in individual patients may be possible according to their tolerance.     

Phase I and pharmacologic study of paclitaxel and cisplatin with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor: neuromuscular toxicity is dose-limiting

PURPOSE: To determine the maximum-tolerated doses (MTD), the principal toxicities, and the pharmacologic behavior of high doses of Taxol (paclitaxel; Bristol-Myers Squibb, New York, NY) combined with cisplatin and granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Untreated and minimally pretreated solid-tumor patients received 24-hour infusions of Taxol on day 1 followed by cisplatin on day 2 and G-CSF, 5 micrograms/kg/d subcutaneously (SC), beginning on day 3. Treatment was repeated every 3 weeks. Starting doses of Taxol and cisplatin were 135 and 75 mg/m2, respectively. RESULTS: The development of a severe peripheral neuropathy and/or severe myalgias precluded the chronic administration of Taxol and cisplatin with G-CSF at doses greater than 250 mg/m2 and 75 mg/m2, respectively. At this dose, the mean Taxol steady-state plasma concentration (Css) exceeds concentrations capable of inducing pertinent antimicrotubule effects in vitro. The severity of the neuropathy was related to the cumulative dose of Taxol, the magnitude of the dose administered during each treatment, and the presence of a pre-existing medical disorder associated with peripheral neuropathy. A proximal myopathy of modest severity also was documented. Although severe neutropenia occurred frequently, especially at the MTD, it was rarely associated with fever (8% of courses), and absolute neutrophil counts (ANCs) less than 500/microL never persisted for more than 5 days. Responses were noted in non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and head and neck, breast, and esophageal cancers. CONCLUSION: Taxol and cisplatin doses of 250 mg/m2 and 75 mg/m2, respectively, can be administered repetitively with G-CSF to untreated and minimally pretreated patients. However, these doses are not recommended for patients with pre-existing neuropathies until additional experience in high-risk patients is obtained. Although this Taxol dose is nearly 85% higher than the dose that can be combined with cisplatin in the absence of G-CSF, this high-dose regimen should not be used outside the investigational setting until a dose-response relationship has been demonstrated for Taxol in randomized clinical trials.     

Paclitaxel by 96-hour continuous infusion in combination with cisplatin: a phase I trial in patients with advanced lung cancer

PURPOSE: To determine the maximum-tolerated dose (MTD) of paclitaxel administered by 96-hour continuous infusion in combination with cisplatin, to determine if the addition of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) permits significant paclitaxel dose escalation, and to assess the toxicity and preliminary activity of this combination in patients with advanced lung cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Fifty patients with untreated lung cancer were enrolled: 42 had advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and eight had extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer (SCLC). Patients received paclitaxel doses of 100 to 180 mg/m2/96 hours and cisplatin doses of 60 to 80 mg/m2 as a single 30-minute bolus injection at the end of the paclitaxel infusion. RESULTS: Two of six patients experienced dose-limiting neutropenia at a dose of paclitaxel 140 mg/m2/96 hours and cisplatin 80 mg/m2. With G-CSF support, one of three patients experienced both dose-limiting mucositis and fatal neutropenic sepsis at a dose of paclitaxel 180 mg/m2/96 hours and cisplatin 80 mg/m2. Significant peripheral neuropathy developed in five patients and occurred after six or more cycles of therapy. Thirty-three of 42 patients with NSCLC had measurable disease; the objective response rate was 55%, with two complete responses and 16 partial responses. For all 42 patients with NSCLC, the median time to progression and median survival duration were 5 months and 10 months, respectively. The actuarial 1-year survival rate was 41%. Of eight SCLC patients, four responded to therapy, and the median survival duration for all SCLC patients was 11 months. CONCLUSION: The MTD without G-CSF is paclitaxel 120 mg/m2/96 hours and cisplatin 80 mg/m2, and the MTD with G-CSF is paclitaxel 160 mg/m2/96 hours and cisplatin 80 mg/m2. Infusional paclitaxel with cisplatin is well tolerated and active in patients with advanced NSCLC.     

A phase I-II study of paclitaxel, ifosfamide, and vinorelbine with filgrastim (rhG-CSF) support in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer

PURPOSE: We designed a phase I-II trial of three active agents, paclitaxel, ifosfamide, and vinorelbine, in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) to: 1) define the dose-limiting toxicities (DLT) and maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of paclitaxel with filgrastim (G-CSF) support; and 2) determine the overall response rate and median survival of patients treated on this regimen. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We treated cohorts of patients with stage IIIB or IV NSCLC with ifosfamide 1.2-1.6 g/m2/day x 3 and vinorelbine 20-25 mg/m2/day x 3 and escalating doses of paclitaxel at 100-175 mg/m2 on day 2 with G-CSF support on a 21-day cycle. One prior experimental single-agent chemotherapy regimen was allowed. RESULTS: Fifty-six patients, were enrolled on this trial: 27 on the phase I portion of the study and an additional 29 at the recommended phase II dose (RPTD). Thirteen patients had received prior chemotherapy. Paclitaxel doses of 175 mg/m2 and 150 mg/m2 produced dose-limiting myelosuppression, and the RPTD was determined to be paclitaxel 135 mg/m2 with ifosfamide 1.2 g/m2/day on days 1-3 and vinorelbine 20 mg/m2/ day on days 1-3 with G-CSF support. The overall response rate was 18%, with a median survival of 6.1 months. Six of 35 patients (17%) treated at the RPTD achieved a partial response to therapy. Grade IV neutropenia was observed in 19 of 35 patients at this dose, with eight patients suffering febrile neutropenia. CONCLUSIONS: This non-cisplatin-containing three-drug regimen has substantial toxicity and low activity in advanced NSCLC, and does not seem to improve on prior regimens. It is unclear whether the lack of efficacy relates to an antagonistic reaction between the specific drugs, administration schedule, or to subtherapeutic doses of the individual agents.     

Final report of a phase II evaluation of paclitaxel in patients with advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck: an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group trial (PA390)

BACKGROUND: A number of single agents have been tested in patients with carcinoma of the head and neck receiving palliative treatment. In general, 15-30% of patients achieve a partial response lasting 3-4 months. Treatment has not been shown to alter survival rates. It is clear that new drugs with potentially greater activity need to be identified. For this purpose, the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group conducted a Phase II evaluation of paclitaxel. METHODS: Patients with recurrent, metastatic, or locally advanced, incurable squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck were eligible. The dose and schedule tested was the maximum tolerable dose of 250 mg/m2 determined from Phase I trials using a 24-hour infusion schedule and granulocyte-colony stimulating factor support. Courses were given at 3-week intervals until progression of disease was documented. Dose modifications were specified for hematologic toxicity and for neurotoxicity. RESULTS: Thirty-four patients were registered on study and 30 were eligible. Severe or life-threatening granulocytopenia was the most frequent toxicity observed, occurring in 91% of patients. Prior to response evaluation, one patient died of sepsis and one died of a myocardial infarct. Response was observed in 40% of eligible patients (4 complete and 8 partial responses). The median duration of response was 4.5 months (range, 2-20 months), with a median survival of 9.2 months and a 1-year survival rate of 33%. CONCLUSIONS: These results indicate that paclitaxel is an active agent for the treatment of squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck. Studies evaluating alternative infusion schedules and combination regimens currently are underway.     

Phase I and pharmacologic study of weekly doxorubicin and 1 h infusional paclitaxel in patients with advanced breast cancer

Doxorubicin and paclitaxel both display strong antitumor activity in the treatment of breast cancer. The optimal schedule of this combination, however, remains undefined. In this phase I and pharmacologic study, we administered weekly 12 mg/m2 doxorubicin as a bolus infusion immediately followed by a 1 h 80 mg/m2 paclitaxel infusion to patients with metastatic breast cancer. A total of 119 weekly courses were delivered to seven patients. Grade IV neutropenia was observed in two patients at the first dose level, thus already defining the maximum tolerated dose. Pronounced non-hematologic toxicities were mild neuropathy (grade I: 39%) and stomatitis (grade I: 19%, grade II: 8%). No signs of cardiac toxicity were observed with this dose schedule. Three partial responses were achieved in this group of heavily pretreated patients. The pharmacokinetics of paclitaxel, doxorubicin and Cremophor EL with this schedule were analyzed. Overall, the schedule was well tolerated and combined with its preliminary response rate justifies further evaluation in phase II studies.     

First-cycle blood counts and subsequent neutropenia, dose reduction, or delay in early-stage breast cancer therapy

PURPOSE: If patients could be ranked according to their projected need for supportive care therapy, then more efficient and less costly treatment algorithms might be developed. This work reports on the construction of a model of neutropenia, dose reduction, or delay that rank-orders patients according to their need for costly supportive care such as granulocyte growth factors. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A case series and consecutive sample of patients treated for breast cancer were studied. Patients had received standard-dose adjuvant chemotherapy for early-stage nonmetastatic breast cancer and were treated by four medical oncologists. Using 95 patients and validated with 80 additional patients, development models were constructed to predict one or more of the following events: neutropenia (absolute neutrophil count [ANC] < or = 250/microL), dose reduction > or = 15% of that scheduled, or treatment delay > or = 7 days. Two approaches to modeling were attempted. The pretreatment approach used only pretreatment predictors such as chemotherapy regimen and radiation history; the conditional approach included, in addition, blood count information obtained in the first cycle of treatment. RESULTS: The pretreatment model was unsuccessful at predicting neutropenia, dose reduction, or delay (c-statistic = 0.63). Conditional models were good predictors of subsequent events after cycle 1 (c-statistic = 0.87 and 0.78 for development and validation samples, respectively). The depth of the first-cycle ANC was an excellent predictor of events in subsequent cycles (P = .0001 to .004). Chemotherapy plus radiation also increased the risk of subsequent events (P = .0011 to .0901). Decline in hemoglobin (HGB) level during the first cycle of therapy was a significant predictor of events in the development study (P = .0074 and .0015), and although the trend was similar in the validation study, HGB decline failed to reach statistical significance. CONCLUSION: It is possible to rank patients according to their need of supportive care based on blood counts observed in the first cycle of therapy. Such rankings may aid in the choice of appropriate supportive care for patients with early-stage breast cancer.     

Enterogastric bile reflux during technetium-99m-sestamibi cardiac imaging

Twenty-six patients with squamous cell cancer of the cervix were treated with i.v. paclitaxel, 250 mg/m2 over 3 h every 21 days. They received steroid, H1 and H2 blocker premedications, and granulocyte-colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) support (5 microgram/kg/day). No prior chemotherapy, except as a radiation sensitizer, was allowed. The median age was 50 (range, 36-81) years, and performance status Zubrod was 1 (range, 0-2). Eight (33%) patients had prior surgery, and 22 (92%) had prior radiation therapy. Twenty-four patients were evaluable for response; 2 were later found to be ineligible. Five patients had partial responses (21%; 95% confidence interval, 6-40%), and 14 (58%; 95% confidence interval, 35-78%) had stable disease. The median duration of response was 10 (range, 3-27+) weeks. The responses were within the radiation port (four responses) and outside of it (one response). The median interval from the start of irradiation to the start of paclitaxel in responding patients was 94 weeks, whereas in patients with stable disease it was 68 weeks, and in patients whose disease progressed it was 46 weeks. Eighty-eight percent of the 105 cycles of paclitaxel were administered at a dose of 250 mg/m2 or higher. Granulocytopenia was brief and noncumulative, with grades 3 and 4 experienced by 5 and 3 patients, respectively. G-CSF was used for a median of 7 (range, 2-14) days/cycle. Anemia was mild, with G3 noted in 3 patients, and thrombocytopenia was not significant. Infections and musculoskeletal pain were mild and infrequent. Sensory (14 patients G1 or G2 and 2 patients G3) and motor (4 patients G1 or G2 and 1 patient G3) neurotoxicity was noted. There was no significant cardiovascular toxicity. Paclitaxel is active in patients with squamous cell cancer of the cervix and is well tolerated at this dose schedule with G-CSF support.     

Modeling the cost-effectiveness of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor use in early-stage breast cancer

PURPOSE: To model the cost-effectiveness (CE) of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) in early-stage breast cancer when its use is directed to those most in need of the medication. METHODS: A conditional CE model was developed for the use of G-CSF based on a ranking of patient need as determined by patient blood counts during the first cycle of chemotherapy. In the base case, no G-CSF was used. In the alternative case, G-CSF was used in the following manner. If the risk of a neutropenic event (as defined by a predictive model based on nadir absolute neutrophil count [ANC] and hemoglobin decrease in cycle 1) was equal to or exceeded a predetermined critical value "T," then patients would receive G-CSF in cycles 2 through 6 of chemotherapy. If the risk of an event was less than T, patients would not use G-CSF unless an event occurred, at which time G-CSF would be administered with every subsequent cycle. RESULTS: A decision rule (T) that would allow the most needy 50% of early-stage breast cancer patients to receive G-CSF after the first cycle of chemotherapy resulted in a CE ratio of $34,297 dollars per life-year saved (LYS). If only the most needy 10% of patients received G-CSF, then the associated CE ratio was $23,748/LYS; if 90% of patients could receive the medication, the CE ratio would be $76,487/LYS. These estimates were relatively insensitive to inpatient hospital cost estimates (inpatient costs for fever and neutropenia of $3,090 to $7,726 per admission produced dollar per LYS figures of $34,297 to $32,415, respectively). However, the model was sensitive to assumptions about the shape of the relationship between dose reduction and disease-free survival (DFS) at 3 years. CONCLUSION: Providing G-CSF to the neediest 50% of early-stage breast cancer patients (as defined by first-cycle blood counts) starting after the first cycle of chemotherapy is associated with a CE ratio of $34,297/LYS, which is well in the range of CE ratios for treatment of other common medical conditions. Furthermore, conditional CE studies, based on predictive models that incorporate individual patient risk, allow one to define populations for which therapy is, or is not, cost-effective. Limitations of our present understanding of the shape of the chemotherapy dose-response curve, especially at low levels of dose reductions, affect these results. Further work is required to define the shape of the dose-response curve in early-stage breast cancer.     

Loss of biological activity due to Glu-->Arg mutation at residue 11 of the B subunit of cholera toxin

PURPOSE: To determine the maximum tolerated dose, toxicities, and potential antitumor activity of edatrexate (E), an antifolate agent with enhanced in vitro antitumor activity as compared with methotrexate (M), when given in combination with vinblastine, doxorubicin, cisplatin, and filgrastim (G-CSF) to patients with advanced malignancies. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Thirty-seven patients with advanced malignancies were treated with escalating doses of edatrexate in combination with vinblastine (V), doxorubicin (A), cisplatin (C), and filgrastim (EVAC/G-CSF) following three different subsequently developed schedules. Schedule 1 was patterned after the MVAC regimen, a combination chemotherapy program with activity against different epithelial malignancies, and consisted of E, 40 mg/m2/day, days 1/15/22; V, 3 mg/m2/day, days 2/15/22; A, 30 mg/m2/ day, day 2; C, 70 mg/m2/day, day 2; repeated every 28 days. Schedules 2 and 3 were designed to avoid observed dose-limiting toxicity on schedule 1 consisting of transient elevation of serum creatinine levels and delayed myelosuppression. Schedule 2 consisted of E, 40 or 60 mg/ m2/day, days 1 and 15; V, 3 mg/m2/day, days 2 and 15; A, 30 mg/m2/day, day 2; C, 30 mg/m2/day, days 1 and 2; cycled every 28 days. Schedule 3 consisted of E, 60 to 120 mg/m2/day, day 1; V, 3 mg/m2/day, day 2; A, 30 mg/m2/day, day 2; C, 30 mg/m2/day, days 1 and 2; cycled every 21 days. Filgrastim 5 micrograms/kg/day was given to all patients subcutaneously until the absolute neutrophil count was greater than 10,000/microL postnadir. Three patients were treated on schedule 1, 10 on schedule 2 (four at an E dose of 40 mg/m2/day and six at an E dose of 60 mg/m2/day), and 24 on schedule 3 (six at each of the following E dosages: 60, 80, 100, and 120 mg/m2/day). RESULTS: Dose-limiting toxicities of grade 3 to 4 leukopenia and transient elevation of serum creatinine values were observed in two of three patients treated on schedule 1. A dose-limiting toxicity of grade 3 to 4 leukopenia was noted in two of six patients treated on schedule 2 at an edatrexate dose of 60 mg/m2/day. Two of six patients treated on schedule 3 at an edatrexate dose of 120 mg/m2/day had a dose-limiting toxicity of grade 3 stomatitis (one patient) and grade 3 cytopenia (one patient). Nineteen of 37 patients with evaluable or measurable disease had a response to treatment (response rate 51%, 95% confidence intervals = 35%-67%). Nine of 15 patients with metastatic non-small cell lung cancer responded, including one complete remission (response rate 60%, confidence intervals = 35%-85%). A median survival of 517 days (confidence interval = 163-808 days) and a 1-year survival rate of 60% (confidence interval = 35%-85%) was seen in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer. CONCLUSIONS: The maximum tolerated dose and the recommended phase II dose of edatrexate is 100 mg/m2/day when administered as part of the EVAC/G-CSF program following schedule 3. Promising antineoplastic activity against non-small cell lung carcinomas was observed, and a phase II study is planned.     

Phase II trial of paclitaxel and topotecan with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor support in stage IV breast cancer

PURPOSE: This multicenter phase II trial investigated the efficacy and safety of a combination of paclitaxel and topotecan in patients with pretreated metastatic breast cancer. Plasma levels of paclitaxel and topotecan were obtained during cycle 1 to correlate pharmacokinetic parameters with toxicity. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Paclitaxel was administered intravenously (i.v.) at 230 mg/m2 over 3 hours on day 1 followed by topotecan 1.0 mg/m2 i.v. over 30 minutes on days 1 to 5. Patients received an abbreviated premedication regimen that consisted of ranitidine 50 mg, diphenhydramine 50 mg, and a single 20-mg dose of dexamethasone, all administered i.v. 30 minutes before paclitaxel. Granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (GCSF) was administered at 5 micrograms/kg/d subcutaneously starting on day 6 and continuing until the absolute granulocyte count (AGC) was greater than 10,000/microL. Plasma paclitaxel and topotecan concentrations were assessed during the first cycle using limited-sampling strategies. RESULTS: Seventeen patients were treated. The majority had visceral metastases. Four patients experienced neutropenic fever and one had mild bronchospasm. Only one partial response (PR) was observed. Nadir AGC correlated strongly with both duration of paclitaxel levels greater than 0.05 mumol/L and maximum concentration (Cmax) of paclitaxel. CONCLUSION: This regimen does not produce a response rate superior to that expected with single-agent paclitaxel at doses that do not require growth factor support.     

Hypoxic pulmonary vasoconstriction is impaired in rats with nitrofen-induced congenital diaphragmatic hernia

The aim of this study was to determine the efficacy and toxicity of topotecan administered as a 21-day continuous intravenous infusion in patients with advanced or metastatic adenocarcinoma of the pancreas. 26 previously untreated patients with advanced or metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma received topotecan at a dose of 0.5 mg/m2/day or 0.6 mg/m2/day as a continuous intravenous infusion for 21 days. Courses were repeated every 28 days. 26 patients were assessable for response and toxicity on an intent-to-treat basis. The initial 8 patients at a starting dose of 0.6 mg/m2/day experienced unacceptable myelosuppression and dose delays. The subsequent 18 patients, therefore began therapy at a dose of 0.5 mg/m2/day. The major toxicity of topotecan at this dose and schedule was myelosuppression, which was reversible and non-cumulative. There were no complete responses and two partial responses for a total response rate of 8% (95% confidence interval, 1-25%). Response durations were 17 and 45 weeks. Stable disease was seen in 3 patients. The median time to progression for all patients was 8 weeks and the median survival was 20 weeks. Topotecan given as a 21-day continuous intravenous infusion has a similar response rate and median survival to our previously reported study of the 5-day short infusion regimen in pancreatic carcinoma.     

Three unrelated perturbations similarly uncouple fluid, bulk-membrane, and receptor endosomal flow in rat fetal fibroblasts

AIMS AND BACKGROUND: We investigated the efficacy and tolerability of two doses of paclitaxel, 175 mg/m2 and 135 mg/m2, over a 3-hr infusion, without prophylactic G-CSF, in heavily pretreated patients with anthracycline-resistant breast cancer. Although paclitaxel may share with anthracyclines a common mechanism of drug resistance, there is evidence that the two drugs are not completely cross resistant. METHODS: From July 1994 to January 1996, 42 patients were treated every 3 weeks, for a maximum of 6 cycles; paclitaxel dose was established according to pretreatment extension. RESULTS: In 41 assessable patients we observed 9 partial responses, for an overall response rate of 22% (95% CI, 10-34%). There was no difference in response rate between the two dose levels. Median duration of response was 9 months, median time to progression 5 months, and median survival 9 months. The dose-limiting toxicity was neutropenia, which was grade 3-4 in 40% (135 mg/m2) and 62% (175 mg/m2) of the patients (P = 0.28); neutropenic fever occurred in 24% of the patients, without significant differences between the two dose levels. Other toxicity was mild to moderate. CONCLUSIONS: Paclitaxel at doses of 175 mg/m2 or 135 mg/m2 is active and well tolerated in advanced breast cancer patients resistant to anthracyclines. The prophylactic use of colony-stimulating factors seems appropriate in heavily pretreated patients given the higher dose level.     

Treatment of advanced adenocarcinomas of the exocrine pancreas and the gallbladder with 5-fluorouracil, high dose levofolinic acid and oral hydroxyurea on a weekly schedule. Results of a multicenter study of the Southern Italy Oncology Group (G.O.I.M.)

BACKGROUND: To date there is no established chemotherapeutic treatment for patients with unresectable locally advanced and/or metastatic carcinomas of the exocrine pancreas or the gallbladder. A multicenter Phase II trial has been performed by the Southern Italy Oncology Group with the aim of evaluating the clinical effectiveness and tolerability of weekly 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) in modulation with intravenous (i.v.) high dose levofolinic acid and oral hydroxyurea. METHODS: A total of 70 patients fulfilling the standard eligibility for a Phase II study were enrolled in the trial. Forty patients had advanced pancreatic adenocarcinoma and 30 had advanced gallbladder carcinoma. The treatment schedule was: levofolinic acid, 100 mg/m2, in 500 mL of normal saline over 2-hour infusion followed by 5-FU, 600 mg/m2 i.v. bolus, and oral hydroxyurea, 1000 mg/m2, for 1 day every week for 6 consecutive weeks followed by 15 days of rest. RESULTS: Among the 40 patients with pancreatic adenocarcinoma, 5 (12.5%; 95% confidence level [CL], 8.5-16.5%) showed a partial response with a median duration of 5.6+ months, and 13 had stable disease. Twenty-two patients progressed. Median survival was 5.8 months. Among patients with advanced gallbladder carcinoma, 9 of 30 had a partial response (30%; 95% CL, 26-34%) with a median duration of 6.5 months, and 8 (27%) had stabilization of disease. Thirteen patients showed progressive disease. Median overall survival was 8 months. Toxicity was mild, with Grade 1 to 2 leukopenia and gastrointestinal toxicity the most frequent side effects. No chemotherapy-related deaths were observed. CONCLUSIONS: 5-FU in modulation with i.v. levofolinic acid and oral hydroxyurea on a weekly schedule is well tolerated by the vast majority of patients with locally advanced and/or metastatic carcinoma of the pancreas or the gallbladder. Although response rate and overall survival for patients with pancreatic adenocarcinoma are far from acceptable, the 30% overall response rate achieved in patients with advanced gallbladder carcinoma suggests that 5-FU in modulation with levofolinic acid and hydroxyurea is active in this neoplasm. The combination of modulated 5-FU with other antineoplastic drugs seems worthy of clinical testing in further controlled trials.     

Enhanced myelotoxicity due to granulocyte colony-stimulating factor administration until 48 hours before the next chemotherapy course in patients with small-cell lung carcinoma

PURPOSE: To evaluate the impact of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) priming on peripheral-blood cell counts during standard-dose chemotherapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Twelve patients with relapsed small-cell lung carcinoma (SCLC) were treated with two chemotherapy courses. Six patients received G-CSF priming only before the first course (group A) and the other six patients only before the second course (group B). Each patient served as his own control. Patients were treated with cyclophosphamide, epirubicin, and etoposide (CEE), or with vincristine, ifosfamide, mesna, and carboplatin (VIMP) every 4 weeks. G-CSF was administered subcutaneously 5 microg/kg/d for 6 days until 48 hours before the first or second chemotherapy course. RESULTS: Priming caused a lowering of the WBC nadir, with a median value of 0.95 x 10(9)/L (P = .004), and of absolute neutrophil nadir, with a median value of 0.48 x 10(9)/L (P = .03). There was a trend for a lower platelet (PLT) nadir after G-CSF priming (P = .09). G-CSF priming resulted in a prolonged duration of WBC count less than 3.0 x 10(9)/L of +4.25 days (P = .04), and of WBC count less than 1.0 x 10(9)/L of +0.50 days (P = .03). The duration of neutropenia less than 0.5 x 10(9)/L seemed longer in primed courses (+3.75 days, P = .18). The duration of PLT counts less than 100 x 10(9)/L was prolonged by 1.5 days (P = .04). Hemoglobin (Hgb) levels were not influenced by G-CSF priming. CONCLUSION: G-CSF administration until 48 hours before the next chemotherapy course increases chemotherapy-associated leukocytopenia and thrombocytopenia. This may be of special concern when G-CSF is administered during dose-densified chemotherapy.     

Synergy of growth factors during mobilization of peripheral blood precursor cells with recombinant human Flt3-ligand and granulocyte colony-stimulating factor in rabbits

The potential of recombinant human (rh)Flt3 ligand (FL), alone or in combination with other recombinant growth factors, to mobilize peripheral blood precursor cells (PBPCs) was examined in an animal model. Adult outbred New Zealand White rabbits received subcutaneous injections daily for 14 days in a standardized protocol; whole blood cell counts and colony-forming unit-granulocyte/macrophage (CFU-GM) colonies were measured 3 times weekly during the injection period and for an additional observation period of 14 days. Two animals in each group were treated as follows: 200 or 500 microg/kg FL, 10 microg/kg granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF), 10 or 75 microg/kg stem cell factor (SCF), 10 microg/kg G-CSF + 500 microg/kg FL, 10 microg/kg G-CSF + 75 microg/kg SCF + 500 microg/kg FL. Both G-CSF and FL induced a sustained and dose-dependent increase in the leukocyte count to a maximum of 5-fold. They were additive in combination, leading to a tenfold increase in white blood cell counts. No consistent pattern was observed for platelet counts or red blood cells. No toxic side effects were seen. Both G-CSF and FL mobilized CFU-GM in a dose-dependent fashion to a 59-fold increase for G-CSF and 116-fold for FL. Maximum mobilization occurred on day 4 with G-CSF and on day 11 with FL. G-CSF + FL in combination acted synergistically, inducing a 503-fold increase of CFU-GM over baseline. The addition of SCF to this combination did not alter leukocyte counts or CFU-GM mobilization. Our results indicate that FL is a potent and safe agent for the mobilization of PB-PCs and is synergistic with G-CSF.     

Paclitaxel plus high-dose cyclophosphamide with G-CSF support in patients with relapsed and refractory aggressive non-Hodgkin's lymphoma

Based on the single-agent activity of both paclitaxel and cyclophosphamide in the treatment of non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL), we conducted a phase II study to evaluate the efficacy of the combination of the two drugs in patients with refractory and relapsed aggressive NHL. All patients received 900 mg/m2 bolus of cyclophosphamide intravenously daily for 3 consecutive days with a concurrent infusion of 150 mg/m2 of paclitaxel over 72 h (50 mg/m2/d). 24 h after the completion of chemotherapy, patients received subcutaneous injections of 5 microg/kg of granulocyte-colony stimulating factor (G-CSF) daily until white cell count recovery. Treatment was repeated every 3 weeks. Patients who had at least a partial response (PR) after two courses continued to receive a maximum of four courses. Patients with responding disease were allowed to undergo high-dose chemotherapy followed by stem-cell/bone marrow transplantation if they were eligible. Of the 77 patients who were eligible for the study, 74 (96%) were evaluable for toxicity and treatment response. The overall response rate was 45% (95% CI 33-57%). Patients who received treatment after their disease relapsed from a complete response (CR) had an 81% response rate (38% CRs), whereas those with primary refractory disease had a 22% response rate. Toxicities of > grade 2 included alopecia (100%) and stomatitis (25%). Neutropenic fever of grade > 2 occurred after 18% of the courses, and platelet count of < or = 20 x 10(9)/l developed after 20% of the courses. Thus, the combination of paclitaxel plus high-dose cyclophosphamide is an effective new regimen in the treatment of refractory and relapsed NHL.     

A randomized controlled trial of filgrastim during remission induction and consolidation chemotherapy for adults with acute lymphoblastic leukemia: CALGB study 9111

Recombinant human granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF; filgrastim) shortens the time to neutrophil recovery after intensive chemotherapy, but its role in the treatment of adults with acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) is uncertain. We randomly assigned 198 adults with untreated ALL (median age, 35 years; range, 16 to 83) to receive either placebo or G-CSF (5 microgram/kg/d) subcutaneously, beginning 4 days after starting intensive remission induction chemotherapy and continuing until the neutrophil count was >/=1, 000/microL for 2 days. The study assignment was unblinded as individual patients achieved a complete remission (CR). Patients initially assigned to G-CSF then continued to receive G-CSF through 2 monthly courses of consolidation therapy. Patients assigned to placebo received no further study drug. The median time to recover neutrophils >/=1,000/microL during the remission induction course was 16 days (interquartile range [IQR], 15 to 18 days) for the patients assigned to receive G-CSF and 22 days (IQR, 19 to 29 days) for the patients assigned to placebo (P < .001). Patients in the G-CSF group had significantly shorter durations of neutropenia (<1, 000/microL) and thrombocytopenia (<50,000/microL) and fewer days in the hospital (median, 22 days v 28 days; P = .02) compared with patients receiving placebo. The patients assigned to receive G-CSF had a higher CR rate and fewer deaths during remission induction than did those receiving placebo (P = .04 by the chi-square test for trend). During Courses IIA and IIB of consolidation treatment, patients in the G-CSF group had significantly more rapid recovery of neutrophils >/=1,000/microL than did the control group by approximately 6 to 9 days. However, the patients in the G-CSF group did not complete the planned first 3 months of chemotherapy any more rapidly than did the patients in the placebo group. Overall toxicity was not lessened by the use of G-CSF. After a median follow-up of 4. 7 years, there were no significant differences in either the disease-free survival (P = .53) or the overall survival (P = .25) for the patients assigned to G-CSF (medians, 2.3 years and 2.4 years, respectively) compared with those assigned to placebo (medians, 1.7 and 1.8 years, respectively). Adults who received intensive chemotherapy for ALL benefited from G-CSF treatment, but its use did not markedly affect the ultimate outcome.     

Purification and characterization of human sarcomeric mitochondrial creatine kinase

PURPOSE: A dose-escalation study of irinotecan hydrochloride (CPT-11) combined with fixed-dose cisplatin was conducted to determine the maximum-tolerated dose (MTD), dose-limiting toxicities, and objective response rate in patients with advanced gastric cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Twenty-four patients with or without prior chemotherapy were enrolled. All patients were assessable for toxicities and response. On day 1, CPT-11 was administered as a 90-minute intravenous (I.V.) infusion, which was followed 2 hours later by a 120-minute I.V. infusion of cisplatin 80 mg/m2. CPT-11 alone at the same dose was administered again on day 15. The treatment was repeated every 4 weeks until disease progression was observed. The initial dose of CPT-11 was 60 mg/m2, and was escalated in increments of 10 mg/m2 until severe or life-threatening toxicity was observed. RESULTS: The MTD of this combination was CPT-11 80 mg/m2. At this dose level, 16.7% of patients (two of 12) had leukopenia of less than 1,000/microL, 66.7% (eight of 12) had neutropenia of less than 500/microL, and 16.7% (two of 12) had severe diarrhea of grade 4 during the first course. The dose-limiting toxicity was neutropenia. Ten patients achieved a partial response (PR), and the overall response rate was 41.7% among 24 patients (95% confidence interval, 21.9% to 61.4%). CONCLUSION: The recommended dose and schedule is CPT-11 70 mg/m2 on days 1 and 15 and cisplatin 80 mg/m2 on day 1 every 4 weeks. This combination of CPT-11 and cisplatin, considered to be active against advanced gastric cancer with acceptable toxicity, should be further assessed in a phase II study.