Postoperative patient-controlled epidural analgesia with opioid bupivacaine mixtures

PURPOSE: To determine the efficacy and safety of patient-controlled epidural analgesia of morphine or fentanyl in combination with bupivacaine for postoperative pain relief. METHODS: Forty ASA I-II patients scheduled for major abdominal surgery were studied. After insertion of a lumbar epidural catheter, patients were given a non-opioid general anaesthetic. After surgery patients complaining of pain, received a loading dose of 2 mg morphine (Group I) or 50 micrograms fentanyl (Group II). For continuing pain, 1 mg morphine in 4 ml bupivacaine 0.125% (0.25 mg.ml-1 morphine and 1 mg.ml-1 bupivacaine, Group I) or 20 micrograms fentanyl in 4 ml bupivacaine 0.125% (5 micrograms.ml-1 fentanyl and 1 mg.ml-1 bupivacaine Group II) were administered. Blood pressure, heart rate, respiratory rate and SpO2 were monitored. Assessments of pain (VAS), nausea-vomiting, motor block, pruritus and sedation were recorded for 24 hr. RESULTS: No difference in pain or sedation was observed between groups. The 24 hr postoperative opioid consumption was 15.50 +/- 7.53 mg morphine and 555.10 +/- 183.85 micrograms fentanyl. Total bupivacaine 0.125% consumption was 58.00 +/- 30.14 ml in Group I and 101.05 +/- 36.77 ml in Group II. One patient in Group II complained of motor weakness in one leg. The incidence of nausea (Group I 45%, Group II 10% P < 0.05) and pruritus (Group I 30%, Group II 5% P < 0.05) was less in patients receiving fentanyl. CONCLUSION: Both methods were effective in the prevention of pain but, because of fewer side effects, fentanyl may be preferable to morphine.     

Effectiveness, side effects and costs of postoperative pain therapy: intravenous and epidural patient-controlled analgesia (PCA)

PURPOSE: Improvement of the quality of analgesia, reduction of side effects and costs by application of epidural (PCEA) in comparison to intravenous patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) in postoperative pain treatment. METHODS: 62 patients with upper abdominal surgery took part in this randomised prospective study which was approved by the local ethics committee. Epidural catheters were inserted at T 8/9 (group PCEA). General anaesthesia was performed with propofol, sufentanil 2 micrograms/kg, pancuronium, enflurane and O2:N2O = 1:2. Postoperative analgesia consisted of epidural bupivacaine 0.25% + sufentanil 2 micrograms/ml (BS). (bolus 0.05 ml/kg, lockout 10 min) in group PCEA, or of intravenous morphine (bolus 2 mg. lockout 10 min) in group PCA. The following parameters were recorded until the evening of postoperative day 4: pain intensity at rest (VASR, 1-10) and on coughing (VASH, 1-10), blood pressure, heart rate, blood gas analysis, ability to ambulate, pruritus, nausea/vomiting (PONV), patient satisfaction (0-4), time and expenses for postoperative pain treatment. RESULTS: Median VASR (1 vs 2) and VASH (3 vs 4.5) were lower, cough intensity (2 vs 1) and patient satisfaction score (4 vs 3) were higher in PCEA compared to PCA. Ability to ambulate, pruritus, PONV, haemodynamics, paO2 and paCO2 were comparable. Postoperative pain treatment with PCEA was more time-consuming (407 vs 299 min) and expensive (71 vs 40 S/day) than PCA. CONCLUSION: PCEA in comparison to PCA after major abdominal surgery provides superior analgesia with comparable side effects at approximately 80% higher costs.     

The safety and utilization of patient-controlled analgesia

Between December 1989 and March 1996, more than 6000 patients were treated with patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) at Auckland Hospital. The overall incidence of potentially life-threatening complications was low (0.28%). A small number (276) received PCA with a background opioid infusion. This technique was associated with a higher incidence of such complications (1.08%, P < 0.05). To further characterize the safety and utilization of PCA, a subgroup of 300 patients was analyzed. The average duration of PCA was 76.4 +/- 39.2 hr. The peak morphine consumption was highest on the day of operation (45.4 +/- 37.0 mg) and rapidly declined over the next 3 postoperative days (40.6 +/- 39.0, 33.3 +/- 26.2, and 27.8 +/- 36.6 mg, respectively). The ratio of drug demands to deliveries decreased from 1.76 on the morning of the first postoperative day to 1.17 on the evening of the third. The percentage of patients with inadequate analgesia (pain score > or = 3/10) and an inability to comply with physiotherapy (Bruggemann comfort score < or = 2/10) was high on the first postoperative day (42% and 18%, respectively). Men used significantly more morphine than women (141.7 +/- 123.6 versus 102.7 +/- 111.2 mg, P < 0.0001) and general surgical patients used more morphine than urology and orthopedic patients (152.6 +/- 136.9 versus 96.0 +/- 84.2 and 83.7 +/- 97.9 mg, P < 0.0001). There was no association between morphine consumption and age (r = -0.216). Of the 6% of patients who experienced hypoxemia and 2% who experienced respiratory depression, virtually all had one of three risk factors: bolus dose greater than 1 mg morphine, age greater than 65 years, or intra-abdominal surgery. The most common side effects were nausea and sedation. The incidence of nausea was highest on day 1 (28%) and decreased over the next 2 days (14.3% and 4.7%, respectively). A similar pattern was observed with sedation (incidence over the first 3 days: 28%, 9.3%, and 3.3%, respectively). Overall patient satisfaction scores were high (8.3/10 +/- 1.9). We conclude that the risk of serious complications with PCA is very low, but worrying degrees of hypoxemia and bradypnea do occur. We suggest prescribing regimens that may reduce complications and identify patients at high risk.     

Comparison of tramadol and tramadol/droperidol mixture for patient-controlled analgesia

PURPOSE: To compare the analgesic efficacy and side effects of tramadol vs tramadol and droperidol for post-operative patient-controlled analgesia (PCA). METHODS: Randomised, double-blind study. Thirty-four patients undergoing elective colorectal or head and neck surgery were allocated to Group 1 (n = 18, PCA bolus 10 mg tramadol) or Group 2 (n = 16, PCA bolus 10 mg tramadol + 0.1 mg droperidol). Anaesthesia was induced with fentanyl and thiopentone and maintained with O2, N2O plus enflurane or isoflurane with iv morphine at doses decided by the attending anaesthetists. Muscle relaxation was achieved with atracurium or vecuronium. Patients were observed four-hourly for pain using an 11-point verbal rating scale (VRS). Nausea and vomiting, and sedation were assessed using four-point scales post-operatively. Vital signs, request for rescue anti-emetic and analgesic, and overall satisfaction were recorded. RESULTS: The mean nausea scores were lower in Group 2 (1.00 +/- 1.33 vs 0.06 +/- 0.25 at 0-8 hr, 1.22 +/- 1.93 vs 0.06 +/- 0.25 at 8-16 hr, P < 0.01; 0.81 +/- 1.68 vs 0 at 32-40 hr, P < 0.05; Group 1 vs Group 2). The vomiting scores were also lower (0.50 +/- 1.04 vs 0 at 0-8 hr, 0.67 +/- 1.50 vs 0, at 8-16 hr, P < 0.05; Group 1 vs Group 2). Seven (39%) patients in Group 1, but none in Group 2 requested rescue anti-emetic (P < 0.01). There were no differences in VRS, sedation score, overall satisfaction or vital signs. CONCLUSION: Tramadol and droperidol combination is superior to tramadol alone for post-operative PCA. It provides a similar quality of analgesia with less nausea and vomiting and without an increase in sedation.     

Prophylactic antiemetic therapy with patient-controlled analgesia: a double-blind, placebo-controlled comparison of droperidol, metoclopramide, and tropisetron

This placebo-controlled, randomized, double-blind trial was designed to evaluate the efficacy of three prophylactic antiemetic regimens on postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) during patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) with morphine. We studied 286 elective surgical patients for 36 h postoperatively. Group 1 was saline control. In Groups 2 and 3, metoclopramide or droperidol was administered as an intravenous (i.v.) bolus and then added to morphine in the PCA device. In Group 4, tropisetron, a long-acting investigational 5-hydroxytryptamine subtype 3 (5-HT3) antagonist was given as a single i.v. dose. We assessed the frequency and severity of PONV, as well as the need for rescue, frequency of side effects, and overall patient satisfaction. Severity of PONV was measured with a symptom-severity score (STS) which was based on both intensity and duration. The average total doses of antiemetics were metoclopramide 53.8 +/- 2.2 mg, droperidol 5.99 +/- 0.3 mg, and tropisetron 6.1 +/- 0.2 mg. Control patients had a 54% incidence of PONV. Droperidol reduced both the incidence (P < 0.001) and severity (P < 0.01) of PONV for the entire 36 h. Tropisetron reduced incidence and severity (P < 0.05), but the effect of the single bolus dose lasted only 18 h. Metoclopramide had a marginally significant effect under these conditions. Only droperidol decreased the need for rescue medication (P < 0.01), although rescue with tropisetron was highly effective. Side effects and patient satisfaction were comparable among the groups, but patients receiving droperidol were sleepier (P < 0.05) than control patients and recalled somewhat more anxiety (P = 0.03).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

Diagnosis of trypanosomiasis in experimental mice and field-infected camels by detection of antibody to trypanosome tyrosine aminotransferase

We designed this double-blind study to evaluate the effect of adding small-dose ketamine in a multimodal regimen of postoperative patient-controlled epidural analgesia (PCEA). Ninety-one patients, ASA physical status I-III, undergoing major surgery, received a standardized general anesthesia and epidural catheterization in an appropriate intervertebral space after surgery. A PCEA device was programmed to deliver a regimen of morphine 0.02 mg/mL, bupivacaine 0.8 mg/mL, and epinephrine 4 microg/mL, with the addition of ketamine 0.4 mg/mL (ketamine, n = 45) or without (control, n = 46). The mean visual analog pain scale (VAS) scores during cough or movement for the first 3 days after surgery were higher in the control group than in the ketamine group (P < 0.05), whereas the mean VAS score at rest for the first 2 days were higher in the control group than in the ketamine group (P < 0.05). Furthermore, patients in the control group consumed more multimodal analgesics than patients in the ketamine group for the first 2 days (P < 0.05). The sedation scores and the incidence of side effects (pruritus, nausea, emesis, sleep deprivation, motor block, and respiration depression) were similar between the two groups. We conclude that adding ketamine 0.4 mg/mL in a multimodal PCEA regimen provides better postoperative pain relief and decreases consumption of analgesics. Implications: Many studies have evaluated one or a combination of two analgesics for postoperative pain control, but few have examined a multimodal approach using three or four different epidural analgesics. This study demonstrates an additive analgesic effect when ketamine is added to a multimodal analgesic treatment.     

Intraoperative intravenous ketamine in combination with epidural analgesia: postoperative analgesia after renal surgery

We designed this double-blinded, randomized, controlled study to evaluate the effect of small-dose ketamine IV in combination with epidural morphine and bupivacaine on postoperative pain after renal surgery. An epidural catheter was inserted, and the administration of morphine and bupivacaine was started before surgery. Forty patients were assigned to one of two groups (ketamine or control). The ketamine group was administered a ketamine bolus and infusion during surgery. The median visual analog pain scale (VAS) scores at rest were significantly lower in the ketamine group during the first 6 h (P < 0.01). VAS pain scores on coughing were also significantly lower in the ketamine group (P < 0.01). Cumulative postoperative total analgesic consumption was less in the ketamine group on Days 1 and 2 (P < 0.001). The first analgesic demand time was shorter in the control group (9.2 +/- 11.5 min) than in the ketamine group (22.3 +/- 17.1 min) (P < 0.0001). The incidence of nausea and pruritus was more frequent in the control group (P < 0.05). In conclusion, postoperative analgesia was more effective when spinal cord and brain sensitization were blocked by a combination of epidural morphine/bupivacaine and IV ketamine. IMPLICATIONS: Renal nociception conducted multisegmentally by both the spinal nerves (T10 to L1) and the vagus nerve cannot be blocked by epidural analgesia alone. We demonstrated that IV ketamine had an improved analgesic or opioid-sparing effect when it was combined with epidural bupivacaine and morphine after renal surgery.     

Patient-controlled epidural analgesia after caesarean section using a disposable device

We have evaluated the use of a disposable device, the Patient Controlled Epidural Infusor, for patient-controlled epidural analgesia (PCEA) using pethidine, for pain relief in the first 24 hours after elective Caesarean section. Patients using the Patient Controlled Epidural Infusor (n = 20) were compared with a control group (n = 20) who received PCEA using a standard electronic device. Efficacy, as assessed by visual analogue scores, was comparable to that achieved in the control group. Patient and nursing satisfaction was high and similar to that in the control group. There was a low incidence of side-effects with both devices. Patients using the disposable device used less pethidine than patients using the electronic device (median (interquartile range) 181 (100-275) mg versus 238 (213-375) mg; p = 0.035). Use of this disposable device is an acceptable alternative to more expensive and bulkier electronic devices for PCEA after Caesarean section.     

Postoperative hypoxaemia: continuous extradural infusion of bupivacaine and morphine vs patient-controlled analgesia with intravenous morphine

We carried out a randomized prospective study in 60 patients who had undergone major abdominal surgery for cancer. For postoperative pain control, 30 patients received continuous extradural infusion of 0.125% bupivacaine 12.5 mg h-1 and morphine 0.25 mg h-1 (EXI group) and 30 received patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) with intravenous morphine (1 mg bolus, 5-min lock-out and maximum dose 20 mg 4h-1). Both groups had general anaesthesia. The two groups were compared for postoperative pain scores, satisfaction, sedation and oxygen saturation. Oxygen saturation was recorded continuously the night before surgery and for two consecutive postoperative nights. Episodes of moderate desaturation (90% > SpO2 85%) were more frequent in the EXI group than in the PCA group (P < 0.05). Pain scores were lower in the EXI group compared with the PCA group at rest and while coughing (P < 0.05). No significant difference was found for patient sedation and satisfaction.     

Dose-response relationship of intrathecal morphine for postcesarean analgesia

BACKGROUND: This series investigated the quality of analgesia and the incidence and severity of side effects of intrathecal morphine for post-cesarean analgesia administered over a dose range of 0.0-0.5 mg. METHODS: ONE hundred eight term parturients undergoing cesarean delivery at term and given spinal anesthesia were randomized to receive a single dose of intrathecal morphine (0.0, 0.025, 0.05, 0.075, 0.1, 0.2, 0.3, 0.4, or 0.5 mg). A patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) device provided free access to additional analgesics. PCA morphine use, incidence and severity of side effects, and need for treatment interventions were recorded for 24 h. Data were analyzed with analysis of variance and linear regression analysis for trends among groups. RESULTS: Patient-controlled analgesia use differed significantly between groups; PCA use was higher in the control group than in groups receiving 0.075, 0.1, 0.3, 0.4, or 0.5 mg. Twenty-four-hour PCA morphine use was 45.7 mg lower (95% CI, 4.8-86.6 mg lower) in the 0.075-mg group than the control group. There was no difference in PCA morphine use between the 0.075- and 0.5-mg groups (95% CI, 36.8 mg lower to 45.0 mg higher); despite a fivefold increase in intrathecal morphine dose, PCA morphine use remained constant. There was no difference between control and treatment groups or among treatment groups with respect to nausea and vomiting. Pruritus and the need for treatment interventions increased in direct proportion to the dose of intrathecal morphine (linear regression, P = 0.001 and P = 0.0002, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: These data indicate there is little justification for use of more than 0.1 mg for post-cesarean analgesia. For optimal analgesia, augmentation [corrected] of intrathecal morphine with systemic opioids may be necessary.     

Value of combined spinal and epidural anesthesia in the management of peroperative analgesia in prosthetic surgery of the lower limb. Prospective study of 68 cases

PURPOSE OF THE STUDY: Efficient peri-operative analgesia is more comfortable, allows earlier mobilisation and better functional results for lower limb arthroplasties. We report our 60 cases prospective study of combined spinal and epidural anesthesia, and expose interests of this technique to control peri-operative pain. MATERIALS: From 1994 to 1995, 60 patients ASA class 1 were operated: 45 total hip replacement (THR), 15 total knee replacement (TKR). The average age was sixty five years (range thirty nine to eighty five years). Combined spinal and epidural anesthesia was performed in every case. METHODS: In lateral decubitus position, a translucent 25 Gauge needle was introduced in L2-L3 interspace. In a first time spinal anesthesia was made with 20 mg Bupivacaine. In a second time, a lumbar epidural catheter was inserted. All patients received an epidural post-operative analgesia with 4 mg Morphine once a day during two days and intravenous Paracetamol. Visual analogue scale (0 to 10) (VAS) were recorded after the third post operative hour and every twelve hours. During this period satisfaction mark was also recorded (1 to 3). RESULTS: We didn't observe any case of respiratory depression or infection with the epidural catheter. We observed 10 cases of pruritus (one needed to stop protocol) and 18 urinary retentions. Six uretral catheters were necessary; we had one case of pyelonephritis (escherichia coli). The first micturition was obtained 13.5 hours after the end of surgery. For the fifty nine remaining patients, visual analogue scale was always inferior or equal to 2/10 and the satisfaction mark to 1/3. DISCUSSION: Different techniques allow peri-operative analgesia, but a few are efficient during the first two days. Plexus nerve blocks are simple and reliable but post-operative anesthesia is short (inferior to 15 hours). Intravenous morphine controlled by patients themselves with programmed display needs expensive and sophisticated material. The principal risk is respiratory depression. Epidural morphine has a lower respiratory depression risk, but needs a heavier technique. The principal problems is higher incidence of urinary side effects. Epidural anesthesia might tend to show a greater efficacity with the best visual analogue scale and satisfaction mark. CONCLUSION: The results indicate that combined spinal and epidural anesthesia for the management of peri-operative pain provide an excellent pain control with a daily morphine injection. For lower limb arthroplasties, visual analogue scale is always inferior or equal to 2 and satisfaction mark equal to 1.     

Intrathecal sufentanil compared with epidural bupivacaine analgesia in labour

Epidural analgesia for pain relief during labour has certain disadvantages including slow onset. However, intrathecal sufentanil provides rapid onset and well-controlled analgesia lasting 1-4 h. The aim of this study was to compare the analgesia and the side effects of intrathecal sufentanil with epidural bupivacaine during labour. In a randomized, double-blind and controlled trial 58 parturient women requesting analgesia during labour were studied. The patients received either intrathecal sufentanil 10 micrograms and epidural saline, or intrathecal saline and epidural bupivacaine 20 mg. Visual analogue scores (VAS) for pain, blood pressure, heart rate, respiratory rate, level of sedation and the incidence of pruritus and nausea were recorded. Pain scores were significantly lower between 5 and 90 min after injection in patients receiving intrathecal sufentanil. Pruritus was significantly more frequent among those receiving intrathecal sufentanil. The rapid onset and effective analgesia of intrathecal sufentanil may in certain situations be advantageous.     

Measurement of pulmonary status and surfactant protein levels during dexamethasone treatment of neonatal respiratory distress syndrome

PURPOSE: To study the effect of epidural buprenorphine on minimum alveolar concentration (MAC) of volatile anaesthetics, duration of analgesia and respiratory function in the perioperative period. METHODS: One hundred and twenty patients, ASA I-II undergoing gynaecological surgery were randomly divided into three studies. The forty patients in each study were randomly divided into four groups depending on the dosage; Group I (control), Group II (80 micrograms. kg-1 morphine), Group III (4 micrograms. kg-1 buprenorphine), Group IV (8 micrograms. kg-1 buprenorphine). The MAC of halothane was measured following epidural administration of the agents in each group. The duration of analgesia was assessed by the first request for pentazocine. Postoperative analgesic effects were assessed by the total dosage of pentazocine required for the 48 hr after surgery. Respiratory rate (RR), minute volume (MV), and PaCO2 were measured during surgery and the postoperative period. The MAC of halothane was reduced in Group IV (P < 0.01). The duration of analgesia was 10.0 +/- 5.1 hr (Mean +/- SE) in Group I, 37.7 +/- 4.7 hr in Group II, 27.1 +/- 7.1 hr in Group III, and 44.4 +/- 4.1 hr in Group IV. Total dosage of pentazocine was lower in Group IV (P < 0.05) than in the other groups. The decrease of RR, MV and the increase of PaCO2 were observed within 60 min in Group III and IV dose dependently. CONCLUSION: Epidural buprenorphine administered in a dose of 4 or 8 micrograms. kg-1 provides postoperative analgesia that is no less effective than that of morphine.     

Comparative study of postoperative analgesia with methadone and fentanyl in continuous peridural perfusion

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether continuous epidural perfusion of fentanyl, which is more liposoluble than methadone, provides a similar level of analgesia with fewer side effects than methadone administered by the same route for postoperative pain. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Prospective double blind study of 40 patients, randomly assigned to two groups. Group F (n = 20) received 300 micrograms-1200 micrograms/24 h in epidural perfusion. Group M (n = 20) received 9 mg-18 mg/24 h in epidural perfusion. In both cases treatment was for pain in the first 72 h after abdominal surgery. Analgesia quality was evaluated on a visual analog (VAS) scale from 1 to 10 at rest and moving. Need for complementary analgesia was also recorded, as were side effects related to the technique. RESULTS: Quality of analgesia was good and similar which both drugs. Postoperative pain did not surpass 3 on the VAS at rest or 4.5 while moving, although group F patients' need for complementary analgesia was significantly greater (p < 0.05). The incidence of hypoxemia was greater in group M than in group F (p = 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Continuous epidural perfusion of fentanyl provides good analgesia and is associated with less hypoxemia than is methadone.     

Evaluation of the safety and efficacy of ketorolac versus morphine by patient-controlled analgesia for postoperative pain

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To compare ketorolac tromethamine with morphine for pain management after major abdominal surgery. DESIGN: Double-blind, randomized study. SETTING: Hospital recovery room and postoperative surgical unit. PATIENTS: One hundred ninety-one patients with at least moderate pain after major abdominal surgery. INTERVENTIONS: Patients received ketorolac by patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) bolus alone (Ket B), ketorolac by bolus plus infusion (Ket I), or morphine by PCA bolus (morphine), with injectable morphine available for supplementation. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Levels of sedation, pain intensity, pain relief, and adverse events were recorded at baseline, at 2, 4, and 6 hours, and at termination. Supplemental morphine was required by 71% of Ket B patients, 67% of Ket I patients, and 38% of morphine patients (p < or = 0.001 for Ket B vs morphine). Although patients receiving ketorolac required more supplemental morphine than the morphine group (6.0 mg Ket I, 6.2 mg Ket B, 4.0 mg morphine), there was a large morphine-sparing effect in both ketorolac groups (total morphine 6.0 mg Ket I, 6.2 mg Ket B, 33.3 mg morphine). Overall pain relief scores were similar for morphine and Ket I groups, and were lower for Ket B than for morphine (p = 0.002). There were no differences among groups in numbers of patients with adverse events. CONCLUSION: Ketorolac may be effective when administered by PCA device, and has a clear morphine-sparing effect.     

Prophylactic oral dolasetron mesylate reduces nausea and vomiting after abdominal hysterectomy. The Canadian Dolasetron Study Group

PURPOSE: The incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) varies from 50% to 75% after gynaecological surgery under general anaesthesia. This study evaluates the dose-response relationships, safety, and efficacy of the new 5-HT3 antagonist, dolasetron mesylate, in the prevention of PONV in women undergoing total abdominal hysterectomy (TAH). METHODS: Three hundred and seventy four women scheduled for TAH under general anaesthesia were studied at 13 Canadian centres. Patients received in a randomized, double-blind manner 25, 50, 100, or 200 mg dolasetron or placebo po one to two hours before induction of anaesthesia. The anesthetic protocol was standardized. Efficacy was evaluated for 24 hr after surgery by comparing the number of emetic episodes, administration of rescue medication, severity of nausea, and patient satisfaction. RESULTS: Analysis of complete response (no emetic episodes and no rescue for 24 hr) revealed a linear dose-response relationship across dolasetron groups (P < 0.002). Dolasetron 100 mg (P < 0.003) and 200 mg (P < 0.01) were superior to placebo. The percentage of patients with no emetic episodes increased from 29.3% (placebo) to 54.1 % (100 mg). Subgroup analysis revealed ASA status (I > II), previous history of PONV, previous history of motion sickness, and total morphine dose (> 55 mg associated with less PONV than < 55 mg) influenced the incidence of emetic symptoms, but did not alter the results of the primary analysis. CONCLUSION: Prophylactic dolasetron (100 mg and 200 mg) reduces the incidence of PONV in patients having total abdominal hysterectomy.     

The effect of tourniquet release time on the analgesic efficacy of intraarticular morphine after arthroscopic knee surgery

A randomized, controlled study was conducted in patients undergoing elective arthroscopic knee surgery to assess the effects of tourniquet release time on analgesia after intraarticular (I.A.) injection of morphine. Standardized general anesthetic and surgical techniques were used for all patients, including a thigh tourniquet inflated at pressures between 300 and 350 mm Hg. At the conclusion of the arthroscopic procedure, 5 mg morphine in 25 mL saline was administered I.A. Patients were then randomized to one of two treatment groups. In Group 1 (n = 20), the tourniquet was kept inflated for 10 min after I.A. injection, whereas in Group 2 (n = 20), the tourniquet was deflated immediately after I.A. injection. Postoperative pain was assessed using a visual analog scale in the recovery room when the patients were awake and at 2, 4, 6, 8, and 24 h after I.A. injection. Patients who complained of pain in the recovery room received increments of intravenous meperidine 25-50 mg. On discharge from the recovery room, patients received oral mefenamic acid 250-500 mg for pain relief. The time and quantity of analgesics required were recorded. Patients in Group 1 had significantly (P < 0.05) lower pain scores than those in Group 2 at 2, 4, 6, and 8 h postoperatively. These low pain scores were associated with lower requirements of supplementary analgesics. We conclude that, as compared with releasing the tourniquet immediately after I.A. injection of morphine, maintaining the tourniquet inflated for 10 min provides superior analgesia and decreases the need for supplemental analgesics.     

Fentanyl analgesia increases the incidence of postoperative hypothermia in neonates

Postoperative hypothermia remains a clinical problem in neonates undergoing surgery. Intraoperative analgesia can blunt the metabolic and hormonal response to operative stress in neonates. However, its effects on heat production and thermoregulation are not known. The aim of this review was to characterise the effects of intraoperative analgesia on body temperature in neonates undergoing surgery. The case notes of 25 consecutive neonates who underwent major operations were retrospectively reviewed. Axillary temperature was measured before the operation, and postoperatively after returning to the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU). Patients were divided into groups based on the intraoperative analgesic used: (1) 9 neonates received fentanyl; (2) 5 received morphine; and (3) 11 received epidural bupivacaine. All groups were comparable in terms of conceptional age, postnatal age, body weight, duration of operation, and operative stress score. In all groups the body temperature was significantly lower at the time of returning to the NICU than preoperatively. Three patients (33%) who received fentanyl became hypothermic during the operation, whereas none of those who received either morphine or bupivacaine had hypothermia. The drop in temperature between preoperative and initial postoperative values was significantly greater in patients who received fentanyl intraoperatively (median drop 0.8 degreesC, range 0.6 - 2.4) when compared with patients who received morphine (P = 0.02) or epidural bupivacaine (P = 0.01). These data suggest that intraoperative fentanyl modulates the postoperative body temperature in neonates. We hypothesise that fentanyl blocks metabolic heat production, which results in a reduction in postoperative body temperature.     

High-Resolution Infrared Fourier-Transform Spectroscopy and Rotational Constants of the nu4 Band of BrNO2

In this study, we assessed the influence of three analgesic techniques on postoperative knee rehabilitation after total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Forty-five patients scheduled for elective TKA under general anesthesia were randomly divided into three groups. Postoperative analgesia was provided with i.v. patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) with morphine in Group A, continuous 3-in-1 block in Group B, and epidural analgesia in Group C. Immediately after surgery, the three groups started identical physical therapy regimens. Pain scores, supplemental analgesia, side effects, degree of maximal knee flexion, day of first walk, and duration of hospital stay were recorded. Patients in Groups B and C reported significantly lower pain scores than those in Group A. Supplemental analgesia was comparable in the three groups. Compared with Groups A and C, a significantly lower incidence of side effects was noted in Group B. Significantly better knee flexion (until 6 wk after surgery), faster ambulation, and shorter hospital stay were noted in Groups B and C. However, these benefits did not affect outcome at 3 mo. We conclude that, after TKA, continuous 3-in-1 block and epidural analgesia provide better pain relief and faster knee rehabilitation than i.v. PCA with morphine. Because it induces fewer side effects, continuous 3-in-1 block should be considered the technique of choice. Implications: In this study, we determined that, after total knee arthroplasty, loco-regional analgesic techniques (epidural analgesia or continuous 3-in-1 block) provide better pain relief and faster postoperative knee rehabilitation than i.v. patient-controlled analgesia with morphine. Because it causes fewer side effects than epidural analgesia, continuous 3-in-1 block is the technique of choice.     

Epidural morphine plus ketamine for upper abdominal surgery: improved analgesia from preincisional versus postincisional administration

Increased postoperative pain may be caused by central nervous system plasticity, which may be related to actions of N-methyl-D-aspartic acid (NMDA) receptors on neurons in the dorsal horn of the spinal cord. Opioids act mainly on presynaptic receptors and reduce neurotransmitter release, while ketamine antagonizes NMDA receptors and prevents wind-up and long-term potentiation. Thus, we postulated that central nervous system sensitization would be prevented more effectively by the preoperative use of these two drugs simultaneously, and the effect of preemptive analgesia would be demonstrated. Ketamine, 60 mg, and morphine, 2 mg, were injected epidurally through an indwelling catheter that was inserted at the T7-8 interspace in 60 ASA physical status class 1-2 patients. The drugs were injected before induction of anesthesia (Group 1; n = 30) or immediately after removal of a surgical specimen (Group 2; n = 30). An additional 2 mg of morphine was injected when the patients complained of resting pain. The analgesic effect was assessed by the time from first analgesic injection to second dose and the number of patients who needed supplemental injections. Complications were also noted. The duration of analgesia was longer (P < 0.01) in Group 1 (31.1 +/- 16.0 h) than in Group 2 (21.1 +/- 12.0 h), and the proportion of patients who needed supplemental injections was decreased (P < 0.05) in Group 1 (56.7%) compared with Group 2 (90.0%). The incidence of adverse effects was not different between the two groups. In conclusion, preoperative administration of morphine and ketamine is more effective in reducing postoperative pain than it is when given during the operation.