Effect of prior photodegradation on the biodegradation of polypropylene/poly(3‐hydroxybutyrate) blends

In this work, the effect of blend composition and previous photodegradation on the biodegradation of polypropylene/poly(3‐hydroxybutyrate) (PP/PHB) blends was studied. The individual polymers and blends with or without the addition of poly(ethylene‐co‐methyl acrylate‐co‐glycidyl methacrylate) [P(E‐MA‐GMA)] as a compatibilizer (in the case of 80/20 blend) were exposed to UV light for 4 weeks and their biodegradation was evaluated. The biodegradation of PHB phase within the blends was hindered as PHB was the dispersed phase and PP fibrous particles were observed at the surface of the blend samples after biodegradation. Previous photodegradation lessened PHB biodegradation but enhanced the biodegradation of PP and the blends within the biodegradation time studied. Photodegradation resulted in cracks at the surface of PP and the blends, which probably facilitated the biotic reactions due to an easier access of the enzymes to deeper polymer layers. It also resulted in a decrease of molecular weight of PP phase and formation of carbonyl and hydroxyl groups which were consumed during biodegradation. Size exclusion chromatography analysis revealed that only the short chains of PP were consumed during biodegradation. POLYM. ENG. SCI., 53:2109–2122, 2013. © 2013 Society of Plastics Engineers     

Valorization of poly(butylene terephthalate) wastes by blending with virgin polypropylene: Effect of the composition and the compatibilization

Blends of recycled poly(butylene terephthalate) (PBT) parts obtained from scrapped cars, and virgin polypropylene (PP), were prepared in a twin‐screw extruder at different compositions. Selected compositions were also prepared with the presence of ethylene‐co‐glycidyl methacrylate copolymer (E‐GMA) and ethylene/methyl acrylate/glycidyl methacrylate terpolymer (E‐MA‐GMA) compatibilizers. The effect of the composition and the type of compatibilizer, as well as the mixing conditions, on the morphology phase, thermal, viscoelastic behavior, and mechanical properties of the blends has been investigated. Blends PP/PBT of various composition exhibit a coarse morphology and a poor adherence between both phases, resulting in the decrease of ductility, whereas at weak deformation, PBT reinforced the tensile properties of PP. Addition of E‐GMA and E‐MA‐GMA to the PP/PBT blend exhibited a significant change in morphology and improved ductility because of interfacial reactions between PBT end chains and epoxy groups of GMA that generate EG‐g‐PBT copolymer. Moreover, thermal and viscoelastic study indicated that the miscibility of PP and PBT has been improved further and the reactions were identified. The E‐MA‐GMA results in the best improvement of ductility. POLYM. ENG. SCI., 2008. © 2008 Society of Plastics Engineers     

Eco‐plastics: Morphological and mechanical properties of recycled poly(carbonate)‐crushed rubber (rPC‐CR) blends

Crushed tire rubber particles (CR) have been dispersed into a recycled poly(carbonate) matrix (rPC) to obtain an eco‐friendly plastic (EFP). A positive synergy was expected from the association of an elastomeric phase to a tough thermoplastic matrix, helping on the other hand to develop a plastic with low impact on the environment. Mechanical melt‐mixing alone cannot provide a suitable interface, and led to blends with poor mechanical properties. Consequently, we have investigated different strategies to improve the EFP properties: First, the rubber surface has been treated by flaming or washing with dichloromethane and second, two copolymers, poly(ethylene‐co‐ethyl acrylate‐tert‐hydroxyl methacrylate) (E‐EA‐MAH) and poly(ethylene‐co‐methyl acrylate‐ter‐glycidyl methacrylate) (E‐MA‐GMA), were used to compatibilize CR particles with rPC matrix by reactive melt‐mixing in an internal mixer. The resulting blends mechanical properties were studied through static tension experiments and interpreted to the light of electronic microscopy fractography analysis and nanoindentation experiments. Significant gain of mechanical properties can be obtained by decreasing CR size under 140 μm (especially for CR contents between 5 and 20% m/m). To reach similar properties with rubber particles of diameter over 140 μm (but under 350 μm), it is necessary to activate their surface by either dichloromethane washing or flaming. Additional use of a compatibilizer extends the plastic behaviour domain of the EFP. rPC‐20% w/w CR is the best alternative material of our study. POLYM. ENG. SCI., 47:1768–1776, 2007. © 2007 Society of Plastics Engineers     

Effect of compatibilizer in acrylonitrile‐butadiene‐styrene toughened nylon 6 blends: Ductile–brittle transition temperature

The ductile–brittle transition temperatures were determined for compatibilized nylon 6/acrylonitrile‐butadiene‐styrene (PA6/ABS) copolymer blends. The compatibilizers used for those blends were methyl methacrylate‐co‐maleic anhydride (MMA‐MAH) and MMA‐co‐glycidyl methacrylate (MMA‐GMA). The ductile–brittle transition temperatures were found to be lower for blends compatibilized through maleate modified acrylic polymers. At room temperature, the PA6/ABS binary blend was essentially brittle whereas the ternary blends with MMA‐MAH compatibilizer were supertough and showed a ductile–brittle transition temperature at ?10°C. The blends compatibilized with maleated copolymer exhibited impact strengths of up to 800 J/m. However, the blends compatibilized with MMA‐GMA showed poor toughness at room temperature and failed in a brittle manner at subambient temperatures. © 2003 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 90: 2643–2647, 2003     

Compatibilization and characterization of blends of styrene–maleic anhydride copolymer with modified polyethylenes

Potentially reactive blends of styrene–maleic anhydride (SMAH) with ethylene/methyl acrylate/glycidyl methacrylate (E‐MA‐GMA) and nonreactive blends of SMAH with ethylene/methyl acrylate (E‐MA) were produced in a Brabender batch mixer and in a corotating twin‐screw extruder. The products were characterized in terms of rheology, morphology, and mechanical properties to understand the reaction characteristics between anhydride/epoxy functional groups. Storage modulus, G′, loss modulus, G″ and complex viscosity, η* of the reactive blends were higher than those of nonreactive ones. At 25% E‐MA‐GMA content, maximum in η* was obtained for the reactive blends. The reactive blends showed finer morphology than the nonreactive ones at all concentrations studied. Mechanical characterization showed that reactive SMAH/E‐MA‐GMA blends had higher tensile strength, % strain at break, and tensile modulus than the nonreactive blends for all corresponding modified polyethylene contents. © 2001 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 80: 790–797, 2001     

Reactive compatibilization of PP/PBT blends by a mixture of PP‐g‐MA and epoxy resin

In this study, dual compatibilizers composed of the commercially available maleic anhydride‐grafted polypropylene (PP–MA) and a multifunctional epoxy resin were demonstrated to effectively compatibilize the immiscible and incompatible blends of PP and poly(butylene terephthalate) (PBT). The PP–MA with a low MA content is totally miscible with PP to make the PP phase quasi‐functionalized, so that the multifunctional epoxy has the chance to react with PBT and PP–MA simultaneously to form PP–MA‐co‐epoxy‐co‐PBT copolymers at the interface. These desired copolymers are able to anchor along the interface and serve as efficient compatibilizers. The compatibilized blends, depending on the quantity of dual compatibilizers employed, exhibit higher viscosity, finer phase domain, and improved mechanical properties. Epoxy does not show compatibilization effects for the PP/PBT blends without the presence of PP–MA in the blends. © 2001 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 79: 2272–2285, 2001     

Effect of different types of organoclays and compatibilizers on the properties of polystyrene‐based nanocomposites

Polystyrene/organoclay nanocomposites were prepared by melt intercalation in the presence of elastomeric impact modifiers. Three different types of organically modified montmorillonites; Cloisite® 30B, 15A, and 25A, were used as reinforcement, whereas poly [styrene‐b‐(ethylene‐co‐butylene)‐b‐styrene] (SEBS‐g‐MA) and poly(ethylene‐b‐butyl acrylate‐b‐glycidyl methacrylate) (E‐BA‐GMA) elastomeric materials were introduced to act as impact modifier. Owing to its single aliphatic tail on its modifier and absence of hydroxyl groups, Cloisite® 25A displayed the best dispersion in the polystyrene matrix, and mostly delaminated silicate layers were obtained in the presence of SEBS‐g‐MA. This was attributed to the higher viscosity of SEBS‐g‐MA compared with both E‐BA‐GMA and poly(styrene‐co‐vinyloxazolin) (PS). In addition, the compatibility between SEBS‐g‐MA and PS was found to be better in comparison to the compatibility between E‐BA‐GMA and PS owing to the soluble part of SEBS‐g‐MA in PS. The clay particles were observed to be located mostly in the dispersed phase leading to larger elastomeric domains compared with binary PS/elastomer blends. The enlargement of the elastomeric domains resulted in higher impact strength values in the presence of organoclay. Good dispersion of Cloisite® 25A in PS/SEBS‐g‐MA blends enhanced the tensile properties of this nanocomposite produced. It was observed that the change in the strength and stiffness of the ternary nanocomposites mostly depend on the type of the elastomeric material. © 2012 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J. Appl. Polym. Sci., 2013     

An investigation on recycled PET/PP and recycled PET/PP‐EP compatibilized blends: Rheological,morphological, and mechanical properties

The effectiveness of P(E‐co‐MA‐co‐GMA) as a compatibilizer for recycled PET/PP and recycled PET/PP‐EP (polypropylene (ethylene‐propylene) heterophase copolymer) blends was investigated by means of morphological (scanning electron microscopy), rheological (small amplitude oscillatory shear), mechanical (tensile, flexural and impact tests), and thermal (differential scanning calorimetry) properties. Compatibilizer concentration ranged from 1 to 5 wt % with respect to the whole blend. All blends were obtained in a 90/10 composition using a twin screw extruder. Compatibilization effects for PETr/PP‐EP were more pronounced due to ethylene segments present in both PP‐EP and P(E‐co‐EA‐co‐GMA). PETr/PP‐EP has shown greater dispersed phase size reduction, a more solid‐like complex viscosity behavior and larger storage modulus at low frequencies in relation to PETr/PP blend. For both investigated blends, mechanical properties indicated an improvement in both elongation at break and impact strength with increasing compatibilizer content. PETr/PP‐EP blends showed improved performance for the same level of compatibilizer content. © 2015 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2015 , 132, 41892.     

Reactive mixing of PET and PET/PP blends with glycidyl methacrylate–modified styrene‐b‐(ethylene‐co‐olefin) block copolymers

Styrene‐b‐(ethylene‐co‐butylene)‐b‐styrene (SEBS) and styrene‐b‐(ethylene‐co‐propylene) (SEP, SEPSEP) block copolymers with different styrene contents and different numbers of blocks in the copolymer chain were functionalized by melt radical grafting with glycidyl methacrylate (GMA) and employed as compatibilizers for PET‐based blends. Binary blends of PET with both functionalized (SEBS‐g‐GMA, SEP‐g‐GMA, SEPSEP‐g‐GMA) and neat (SEBS, SEP, SEPSEP) copolymers (75 : 25 w/w) and ternary blends of PET and PP (75 : 25 w/w) with various amounts (2.5–10 phr) of both modified and unmodified copolymers were prepared in an internal mixer, and their properties were evaluated by SEM, DSC, melt viscosimetry, and tensile and impact tests. The roles of the chemical structure, grafting degree, and concentration of the various copolymers on blend compatibilization was investigated. The blends with the grafted copolymers showed a neat improvement of phase dispersion and interfacial adhesion compared to the blends with nonfunctionalized copolymers. The addition of grafted copolymers resulted in a marked increase in melt viscosity, which was accounted for by the occurrence of chemical reactions between the epoxide groups of GMA and the carboxyl/hydroxyl end groups of PET during melt mixing. Blends with SEPSEP‐g‐GMA and SEBS‐g‐GMA, at concentrations of 5–10 phr, showed a higher compatibilizing effect with enhanced elongation at break and impact resistance. The effectiveness of GMA‐functionalized SEBS was then compared to that of maleic anhydride–grafted SEBS. © 2005 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 98: 2201–2211, 2005     

Rheology‐morphology correlation in PET/PP blends: Influence of type of compatibilizer

Rheological and morphological properties of melt processed poly(ethylene terephthalate) (PET)/polypropylene (PP) blends are presented. Two types of compatibilizer namely, PP‐g‐MA <MA= maleic anhydtide> and Elvaloy PTW, an n‐butyl acrylate glycidyl methacrylate ethylene terpolymers, were incorporated at different levels to the PET/PP blend system. Scanning electron microscopy revealed that the dispersed particle sizes were smaller in PET‐rich blends than PP‐rich blends. With increasing compatibilizer level, the refinement of morphology was observed in both the systems. However, the blends compatibilized with PTW showed a more refined (smaller) particle size, and at high PTW content (10 wt%), the morphology changed towards monophasic. The significant changes in morphology were attributed to the highly reactive nature of PTW. Investigation of rheological properties revealed that the viscosity of the PET/PP blends followed typical trends based on mixing rule, which calculates the properties of blends based on a linear average. Incorporation of PP‐g‐MA into the blends resulted in a negative deviation in the viscosity of the system with respect to that of the neat blend. With increasing PP‐g‐MA level, the deviation became more pronounced. Although incorporation of the compatibilizer into the PET/PP blends refined the morphology, it led to a drastic drop of viscosity, which could be attributed to inherently lower molecular weight of the compatibilizer. In the case of the blends compatibilized by PTW, a strong positive deviation in rheological properties was observed that confirmed the stronger interaction between the blend components due to reactive compatibilization process, which led to the more refined morphology in this series of blends. J. VINYL ADDIT. TECHNOL., 19:25–30, 2013. © 2013 Society of Plastics Engineers     

Preparation of polyethylene‐octene elastomer/clay nanocomposite and microcellular foam processed in supercritical carbon dioxide

Polyethylene‐octene elastomer (POE)/organoclay nanocomposite was prepared by melt mixing of the POE with an organoclay (Cloisite 20A) in an internal mixer, using poly[ethylene‐co‐(methyl acrylate)‐co‐(glycidyl methacrylate)] copolymer (E‐MG‐GMA) as a compatibilizer. X‐ray diffraction and transmission electron microscopy analysis revealed that an intercalated nanocomposite was formed and the silicate layers of the clay were uniformly dispersed at a nanometre scale in the POE matrix. The nanocomposite exhibited greatly enhanced tensile and dynamic mechanical properties compared with the POE/clay composite without the compatibilizer. The POE/E‐MA‐GMA/clay nanocomposite was used to produce foams by a batch process in an autoclave, with supercritical carbon dioxide as a foaming agent. The nanocomposite produced a microcellular foam with average cell size as small as 3.4 µm and cell density as high as 2 × 10¹¹ cells cm^?3. Copyright © 2005 Society of Chemical Industry     

Effect of a hybrid compatibilizer on the mechanical properties and interfacial tension of a ternary blend with polypropylene,poly(lactic acid), and a toughening modifier

This study examined the effect of three compatibilizers, namely, a hybrid compatibilizer composed of polypropylene‐maleic anhydride (PP‐g‐MAH) and polyethylene‐glycidyl methacrylate (PE‐g‐GMA), a single compatibilizer composed of PP‐g‐MAH, and a single compatibilizer composed of PE‐g‐GMA, on the mechanical, morphological, and rheological properties of a ternary blend of polypropylene (PP), poly(lactic acid; PLA), and a toughening modifier. The results of tensile strength, flexural strength, and impact strength tests for the ternary blends before and after hydrolysis, revealed that the ternary blend with a hybrid compatibilizer content of 3 phr exhibited better material properties than the blend containing a single compatibilizer. In the weighted relaxation spectra of the ternary blend using the Palierne emulsion model, the ternary blend containing the hybrid compatibilizer, exhibited only one relaxation spectrum peak at ∼ 0.16 s. This result suggests that the ternary blend with the hybrid compatibilizer exhibits uncharacteristic morphological properties, that is, a single‐phase microstructure. The above results suggest that the hybrid mixture is an effective compatibilizer for the ternary blend of PP, PLA, and a toughening modifier. POLYM. COMPOS., 2012. © 2012 Society of Plastics Engineers     

A novel highly copper(II)‐selective chelating ion exchanger based on poly(glycidyl methacrylate‐co‐ethylene dimethacrylate) beads modified with aspartic acid derivative

Anchoring the hydroxyaspartic acid onto poly(glycidyl methacrylate‐co‐ethylene dimethacrylate) (poly(GMA‐co‐EDMA)) beads or epoxysuccinic acid onto ammonium‐modified poly(GMA‐co‐EDMA) beads resulted in a novel chelating resin, which contained up to 0.37 mmol of the ligand per gram of resin. Batch extraction experiments showed a very high selectivity for Cu²⁺ over Zn²⁺ and Cd²⁺ ions in buffered solutions under competitive conditions. © 2001 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 80: 913–916, 2001     

New method for fabricating an α‐fetoprotein affinity monolithic polymer array

Bisphenol A based epoxy acrylate (BABEA), a commercial UV‐curable material, was introduced as a crosslinker for the fabrication of an epoxy‐functionalized monolithic polymer array through UV‐initiated copolymerization with glycidyl methacrylate as the functional monomer and poly(ethylene glycol) 200 as the porogen. Scanning electron microscopy images showed that the monolithic poly(bisphenol A based epoxy acrylate‐co‐glycidyl methacrylate) [poly(BABEA‐co‐GMA)] exhibited a well‐controlled skeletal and well‐distributed porous structure. The α‐fetoprotein (AFP) immunoaffinity monolithic polymer array prepared by the immobilization of AFP on epoxy‐functionalized monolithic arrays was used as an immunosensor for chemiluminescent AFP detection. X‐ray photoelectron spectroscopy results indicate that the AFP antibody was successfully immobilized on the monolithic poly(BABEA‐co‐GMA) array. With a noncompetitive immune‐response format, the proposed AFP immunoaffinity array was demonstrated as a low‐cost, flexible, homogeneous, and stable array for AFP detection. © 2014 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2015 , 132, 41792.     

Synthesis and application of MDPE‐g‐GMA as reactive compatibilizer in blends of MDPE/PET and MDPE/PA6

In the present study, glycidyl methacrylate (GMA) grafted medium density polyethylene (MDPE‐g‐GMA) was synthesized in the molten state and applied as a reactive compatibilizer in MDPE/polyamid6 (PA6) and in MDPE/poly(ethylene terephtalate) (PET) blends. Graft copolymerization of GMA onto MDPE was performed in presence and absence of styrene, with different concentrations of dicumyl peroxide (DCP) as a radical initiator. In the presence of styrene, the MDPE‐g‐GMA with 6% GMA was obtained by addition of only 0.1 phr of DCP. Furthermore, the maximum grafting was reached when 0.6 and 0.7 phr concentration of DCP for styrene containing and styrene free samples were used, respectively. Torque‐time measurement showed faster grafting reaction rate in the presence of styrene. Four MDPE‐g‐GMA samples were selected as compatibilizers in the blends. Furthermore, the effects of melt flow index and grafting content of compatibilizers on mechanical properties and morphology of the blends were investigated through tensile tests and SEM analysis. Tensile test results indicated that the presence of compatibilizers in the blends led to 250 and 133% increase in elongation at break for PA6 and PET blends, respectively. Moreover, the best tensile results for blends were obtained using MDPE‐g‐GMA with high flow ability. The average particle size of the dispersed phase decreased by 350% for PA6 and 300% for PET blends compared with nonreactive blends. © 2011 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci, 2012     

Effect of ageing and annealing on the mechanical behaviour and biodegradability of a poly(3‐hydroxybutyrate) and poly(ethylene‐co‐methyl‐acrylate‐co‐glycidyl‐methacrylate)blend

Poly(3‐hydroxybutyrate) (PHB) undergoes an ageing process that contributes to its remarkable fragility. Blending it with an elastomer is a possibility to increase toughness. In this work, the mechanical properties of a 70/30 wt% blend of PHB and poly(ethylene‐co‐methyl‐acrylate‐co‐glycidyl‐methacrylate) were studied over time. The phenomenon of ageing affected the blend, which lost its ductility and became fragile days after its processing. Differential scanning calorimetry and small angle X‐ray scattering analyses showed that this drop in mechanical properties was due to changes in the crystalline structure of the matrix. Annealing reduced fragility, increased toughness and prevented a re‐ageing of the blend. Biodegradation in soil was also more intense for annealed samples. © 2013 Society of Chemical Industry     

Super‐Tough and Highly‐Ductile Poly(l‐lactic acid)/Thermoplastic Polyurethane/Epoxide‐Containing Ethylene Copolymer Blends Prepared by Reactive Blending

Ethylene‐methyl acrylate‐glycidyl methacrylate copolymer (E‐MA‐GMA) is employed to improve the impact toughness of poly(l ‐lactic acid) (PLLA)/thermoplastic polyurethane (TPU) blends by reactive melt‐blending. The reaction and miscibility between the components are confirmed by Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy, dynamic mechanical analysis, and differential scanning calorimetry. A super‐tough PLLA/TPU/E‐MA‐GMA multiphase blend (75/10/15) exhibits a significantly improved impact strength of 77.77 kJ m^?2, which is more than 17 times higher than that of PLLA/TPU (90/10) blend. A co‐continuous‐like TPU phase structure involving E‐MA‐GMA phase at the etched cryo‐fractured surface and the high‐orientated matrix deformation at the impact‐fractured surface are observed by scanning electron microscopy. The high‐orientated matrix deformation induced by the co‐continuous TPU phase structure is responsible for the super toughness of PLLA/TPU/E‐MA‐GMA blends.     

The effect of compatibilizers and organically modified nanoclay on the morphology and performance properties of poly(acrylonitrile–butadiene–styrene)/polypropylene blends

In this study, poly(acrylonitrile–butadiene–styrene)/polypropylene (ABS/PP) blends with various compositions were prepared by melt intercalation in a twin‐screw extruder. Modifications of the above blends were performed by using organically modified montmorillonite (OMMT, Cloisite 30B) reinforcement as well as two types of compatibilizers, namely polypropylene grafted with maleic anhydride (PP‐g‐MAH) and ABS grafted with maleic anhydride (ABS‐g‐MAH). Increasing the PP content in ABS matrix seems to increase the melt flow and thermal stability of their blends, whereas a deterioration of the tensile properties was recorded. On the other hand, the addition of ABS to PP promotes the formation of the β‐crystalline phase, which became maximum at 30 wt% ABS concentration, and increases the crystallization temperature (T_c) of PP. A tendency for increase of T_c was also recorded by incorporation of the above compatibilizers, whereas the glass transition temperature (T_g) of PP and SAN phase in ABS was reduced. Regarding the Young's modulus, the greatest improvement was observed in pure ABS/PP blends containing organically modified nanoclay. However, in reinforced pure PP, the use of compatibilizers is recommended in order to improve the elastic modulus. The addition of OMMT to noncompatibilized and compatibilized ABS/PP blends significantly improves their storage modulus. POLYM. ENG. SCI., 56:458–468, 2016. © 2016 Society of Plastics Engineers     

Rheological properties of poly(lactic acid) based nanocomposites: Effects of different organoclay modifiers and compatibilizers

Poly(lactic acid) (PLA) nanocomposites containing five types of organically modified, layered silicates and two elastomeric compatibilizers, namely ethylene‐glycidyl methacrylate (E‐GMA) and ethylene‐butyl acrylate‐maleic anhydride (E‐BA‐MAH), were prepared using a twin screw extruder. The morphologies of the nanocomposites were determined by X‐ray diffraction (XRD) and transmission electron microscopy (TEM), and the rheological properties of the melts were measured using small‐amplitude oscillatory shear. XRD revealed that the addition of E‐GMA to the binary nanocomposites resulted in higher compatibility between the organoclay nanoplatelets and the polymer matrix. TEM showed that all of the nanocomposites contained mixed dispersed structures, involving tactoids of various sizes, as well as intercalated and exfoliated organoclay layers. Rheological properties were found to be affected by the differences in the compatibility between the organoclays and the polymer matrix, and by the addition of the compatibilizer. Organoclay types that resulted in high level of dispersion exhibited higher values of complex viscosity compared to that of neat PLA. The addition of E‐GMA introduced a solid‐like rheological behavior at low frequencies. All of the nanocomposites had similar rheological behavior at high frequencies. © 2015 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2016 , 133, 42915.     

Viscoelastic properties of reactive and non‐reactive blends of ethylene‐methyl acrylate copolymers with styrene‐maleic anhydride copolymer

The effects of compatibilizing reactions on the viscoelastic properties and morphology of ethylene‐methyl acrylate copolymers were studied. Potentially reactive blends of styrene‐maleic anhydride copolymer (SMAH) and a terpolymer of ethylene/methyl acrylate/glycidyl methacrylate (E‐MA‐GMA) were compared with a non‐reactive blend of SMAH and an ethylene/methyl acrylate (E‐MA) copolymer with similar rheological properties. Melt mixing was carried out in a batch mixer and in a co‐rotating twin screw extruder. The morphology of the reactive blends showed smaller domain sizes than the non‐reactive blends, and the viscoelastic properties of the blends were very different. The storage and loss moduli and the complex viscosity of the reactive blends were greater than those of non‐reactive blends. The reactive blends had a higher zero shear viscosity, plateau modulus and mean relaxation time than their non‐reactive counterparts, indicating a higher degree of melt elasticity. The melt elasticity was maximum at 25% functionalized ethylene‐methyl acrylate concentration.