智慧城市基础设施建设与评估

智慧城市基础设施建设是一项基础性、关键性、支撑性的工作,直接决定智慧城市的建设水平及最终成败.首先介绍了智慧城市基础设施所包括的信息网络设施、信息共享基础设施,以及经过智能化改造的传统基础设施的特点,然后针对智慧城市基础设施的建设策略进行了阐述,并提出了整个智慧城市基础设施的发展水平评估指标及其评估要点.     

智慧城市创建实践

住房和城乡建设部以“智慧地推进新型城镇化建设”为目标,于2012年底启动了国家智慧城市试点工作。目前,两批共193个不同区域不同种类的市、区、镇,覆盖华东、华南、华中、华北、西北、西南和东北地区,其中华东地区试点城市数量最多,占总量的30％以上,西北、西南地区相对较少。在智慧城市项目建设方面,智慧管理与服务类的项目数量最多,江苏、山东、湖南和安徽等省已启动的项目较多,上海、江苏、贵州和四川4地项目启动率较高。在智慧城市标准化研究方面,引导指标（SCGI）、技术标准（SCTS）和评价指标（SCEI）的研究都已开展。     

关于当前智慧城市规划与建设工作的几个问题

对全国智慧城市（社区）的建设情况进行分析,介绍了当前在智慧城市（社区）规划和建设工作中需要重视的一些问题;同时深入研究了新型城镇化和智慧城市建设之间的关系,指出智慧城市是新型城镇化的先导,并给出了智慧城市智慧外延的生态链;最后分析了在智慧城市建设过程中顶层设计的重要性。     

2012-2013年智慧城市发展回顾与展望

文章首先对海外智慧城市发展现况、发展模式、发展特点进行了系统研究,回顾了过去一年,我国中央政府和各部委对智慧城市的支持政策和举措,归纳提炼出我国智慧城市在战略定位、推进方式、发展思路、创新机制、保障措施等方面的特点,指出我国与海外智慧城市发展的异同。针对其差异,文章认为其本质原因在于工业化发展基础、城镇化发展水平、信息化发展条件以及政府运作机制的不同。我国必须探索走具有中国特色的智慧城市之路。最后,对未来我国智慧城市的发展趋势进行了展望。     

智慧城市指标体系初步研究

文章从智慧城市指标体系研究背景出发,简要介绍了指标体系研究现状,重点介绍了国家住建部在2012年11月发布的《国家智慧城市（区、镇）试点指标体系（试行）》,同中共中央和国务院2014年3月印发的《国家新型城镇化规划（2014-2020）》、国家发改委等八部委2014年8月联合发布的《关于促进智慧城市健康发展的指导意见》的精神和要求进行了对照分析,建议试行指标体系应根据《规划》和《指导意见》的精神与要求进行明确、补充和完善.     

智慧城市关键技术与实现路径研究

随着新一代信息技术的发展,以透彻感知、深度互联、智能应用为特点的智慧城市成为城市信息化的发展趋势和新的愿景.智慧城市是智慧地球在城市的具体体现,其数据源及采集获取、数据管理与存储、分析功能和业务应用等技术有别于传统的信息化城市.根据智慧城市的特征和建设内容,分析智慧城市的关键技术,研究提出物联化、互联化、智能化的技术路径,为我国智慧城市工程实践提供参考.     

基于云计算的智慧城市垂直搜索技术研究

政府、行业、企业和公众都对智慧城市领域的垂直搜索功能有较为迫切的需要,但目前缺少相关的应用研究工作.文章在对垂直搜索引擎、云计算等相关技术进行应用研究的基础上,提出了一种面向智慧城市的垂直搜索平台整体解决方案,该方案具有行业化程度高、性能和可靠性强、可伸缩性好等特点,能够满足不同用户的实际需求,具有良好的应用价值.     

智慧城市标准化研究

基于智慧城市标准化工作的必要性和紧迫性,本文分别总结分析了国际和国内智慧城市标准化情况,给出了较为全面的国内外智慧城市标准化研究现状视图。在此基础上,进一步提出了一种科学的、全面的、符合智慧城市发展要求和特性的智慧城市标准体系架构,并对架构中每项标准的研究内容和研究现状进行详细论述。     

关于我国推进智慧城市的思考与建议——从我国社会经济发展及转型的视角

首先阐述了我国特色的城市化进程以及"智慧城市"产生的背景,其次重点分析了智慧城市区别于数字城市的主要特点以及对传统城市运行管理的影响,并提出了智慧城市的总体架构。基于我国智慧城市的发展现状,结合我国基本国情,探讨了对于我国推进智慧城市的策略思考。最后提出了相关的政策建议。     

5G时代智慧城市概念模型的研究与思考

随着5G的正式商用,智慧城市的建设迎来了新的发展机遇,表现出了全新的特点。为整体理解和把握新时期智慧城市的重要内涵,构建了5G时代智慧城市概念模型,从行业领域、通用能力、城市空间和数字空间4个维度对基于5G的智慧城市进行宏观刻画。并在此基础上,提出概念模型在智慧城市规划和建设中的应用,以期促进我国新型智慧城市的整体发展与突破。     

Modes of making smart cities: Or,practices of variegated smart urbanism

The ‘actually existing’ smart city is not a monolith. It is not directed by a universal logic, nor does it develop in a standardised way. As recent research has argued, the spatial, material, and political contexts of cities have major influence over what smart urbanism looks like in practice. This paper adds analytical depth to, and broadens the geographical scope of, research on the variegated modes of making smart cities. Based on empirical research in multiple Australian cities we use three case studies to explore three different modes of smart urbanism, each one centred on the interests of a different key actor: corporate-centric, citizen-centric, and planner-centric. These different modes can, and do, co-exist in the same city. At times, they are competing logics that fight to pull the city in different directions. Yet, they can also work together to shape smart city initiatives. In describing these different modes, we pay particular attention to the ways that these projects and strategies must contend with the already existing spatial, cultural, and political contexts of each place.     

What Makes Indian Cities Smart? A Policy Analysis of Smart Cities Mission

Despite widespread practices worldwide and increasing research centred on smart urbanism, there is no universal definition for ‘smart cities’. More importantly, a growing line of research warns about the north-centric notion of smart city research which underestimates the fast rate of uptake in the global South. In a search for a contextually informed definition of smart cities, the paper focuses on India: Home to one-third of the global South population, and the cradle of the ambitious Smart City Mission to develop 100 smart cities nationwide. It investigates the Smart City Proposals (SCPs) prepared for the first 20 smart cities prioritised, as part of the Mission. Findings offer a typology of smart city approaches; and shed light on the smart dimensions prioritised (e.g. smart governance, smart citizen and smart infrastructure) versus those overlooked (e.g. smart environment and smart economy) at the smart city policymaking level in India. The paper calls for further empirical research to investigate how the typologies pan out at the implementation of smart cities across the nation.     

Smart cities with a Nordic twist? Public sector digitalization in Finnish data-rich cities

The article studies the urban digitalization and smart city development in the context of Nordic society. The exploration focuses on city officials' views concerning the two largest cities in Finland, Helsinki and Espoo. Both cities are investing heavily on urban digitalization, and they are also building specific smart city districts. The central contexts for the study are the Nordic welfare state model and Finnish cities’ role in society as crucial service providers. The article follows especially conceptualizations connected to urban data which have been highlighted in recent critical smart city research and are also at the heart of the studied cities’ digitalization programmes.     

国外智慧城市研究综述

在发达国家",智慧城市"作为一种应对城市人口增长和破解城市化问题的战略手段于20世纪90年代被提出。经过10多年的发展,智慧城市取得了一定研究成果,并在实践环节有所突破。在国内,学者对智慧城市的关注开始于2009年IBM公司提出的"智慧地球"概念,目前对智慧城市的研究尚处于起步阶段。本文从智慧城市的起源、内涵、构成要素、评价等4个方面,全面介绍国外智慧城市的主要研究成果,并对智慧城市未来研究方向进行了展望,以期对我国智慧城市和新型城镇化建设有所借鉴。     

智慧城市网络安全问题探讨

智慧城市是以物联网、互联网等通信网络为基础,通过物联网、互联网、智能使城市各功能模块协同运行的新型城市发展模式。它的特点是高度集成的智能技术,智能产业的高端发展和高效便捷的智能服务。然而,随着一切都变得更加互联和依赖技术,城市变得更加“智能”,这意味着它们不可避免地拥有更多的技术基础设施和数据,这意味着它们更容易受到新的威胁,随之而来的是更多的网络安全隐患。文章探讨了智慧城市带来的网络安全问题,并给出了相应的解决方案,使得智慧城市的建设更加安全,能更好的改善市民的生活,使得城市治理更加有效。     

新形势下智慧城市规建运一体化矩阵模型研究

疫情触发了经济社会一系列连锁反应,未来面临很多不确定性,但可以确定的一点是全球数字化转型将会加速,智慧城市也会面临新的机遇和挑战。面对我国新型城镇化的不断深入以及“双循环”战略的提出,“十四五”期间,我国智慧城市发展在传统的发展基础之上必定会呈现新的特点,基于这样的判断,文章提出了新形势下智慧城市规划、建设、运营一体化的矩阵模型,从而更好地理清未来智慧城市的建设运营路径。     

Smart cities education: An insight into existing drawbacks

Smart cities aim to increase citizens’ quality of life by employing technology. Education is one of the areas of focus in smart cities and in this context, smart education is a term used to refer to education provided by smart cities. As research in this area has expanded recently as shown by the number of literature reviews in a smart city context, a review could help summarize existing directions focusing in this case on education in the smart cities context. As our understanding on negative consequences is limited, this research will address this knowledge gap by concentrating on challenges and difficulties when it comes to education in smart cities. The articles indexed in Scopus and Web of Science were review and a qualitative analysis of the articles fitting our research criteria was done. Three themes were identified: shortcomings on the existing educational initiatives to address the needs of smart cities, negative consequences of smart city education in other areas and problems that arise as a result of employing technology in education.     

From smart cities to smart social urbanism: A framework for shaping the socio-technological ecosystems in cities

Advocated mostly by technology companies, the smart city concept promises participation, democratization and innovative urbanism. Tracking these promises and ideas, this paper explores “smart urbanism” in ten cities from all over Israel. Based on interviews with leading figures in municipalities, smart city consultants and key figures in technological companies (n = 40), the aims of this paper are to assess the efforts of cities to become smart by responding to the following questions: 1. What is guiding the decision-making process in developing technological initiatives? 2. Does context play a role in implementing technological initiatives? 3. How are the residents perceived, and what tools are being used to address residents' digital differences? The key argument of this paper is threefold: first, in the process of becoming a smart city, the roles of public and private actors are blurred, influencing the process of decision making. Second, despite contextual differences, cities adopt similar digital initiatives. Third, technological initiatives that focus on social needs and address inequality in the digital age are still at the margins. The final discussion suggests that most municipalities are still at an early stage of digitization implementation and have the ability to shape and form a vision for the cities as socio-technological ecosystems in a way that will serve their publics as a whole. The paper ends with a call for shifting the focus from the city to society in developing digital initiatives and cultivating smart social urbanism.