Initial comfort of lotrafilcon A silicone hydrogel contact lenses versus etafilcon A contact lenses for extended wear.

PURPOSE: To compare the initial comfort afforded by silicone hydrogel lenses (lotrafilcon A) versus the comfort afforded by conventional hydrogel lenses (etafilcon A) in extended wear (EW). DESIGN: Prospective, double-masked and randomized controlled trial. METHODS: Lotrafilcon A and etafilcon A contact lenses were eye randomly fitted on an EW basis for 7 days and nights in 20 subjects. A forced-choice subject preference questionnaire was made. Subjects were comfort, dryness, red eye and visual quality after night wear and at the end of the day. Subjective scored satisfaction (scale: 1-5) and lens preference were assessed. RESULTS: Lotrafilcon A proved more comfortable after night wear (60%, CI95% 38-82%) and at the end of the day (70%, CI95% 49-90%) than etafilcon A after night wear (10%, CI95% 0-23%, P<0.05) and at the end of the day (20%, CI95% 2-38%, P<0.05). The feeling of dryness was more marked with etafilcon A after night wear (50%, CI95% 27-72%) and at the end of the day (50%, CI95% 27-72%) than it was with lotrafilcon A (15%, CI95% 0%-31%) after night wear (P>0.05) and at the end of the day (25%, CI95% 5%-44%, P<0.05). General satisfaction with the lotrafilcon A lens was 3.65 points (CI95% 3-4.2) and with etafilcon A 2.95 points (CI95% 2.5-3.3, P<0.05). Eighty percent (CI95% 62%-98%) of subjects preferred lotrafilcon A (P<0.05) for EW. CONCLUSIONS: In EW, lotrafilcon A contact lenses were more comfortable and led to less dryness after night wear and at the end of the day than etafilcon A contact lenses.     

Fast versus gradual adaptation of soft daily disposable contact lenses in neophyte wearers

PurposeDespite the widespread practice of gradually adapting all new soft contact lens wearers (neophytes), there is little evidence-based research underpinning such practice. This work determined if a gradual adaptation period is necessary for neophytes when fitted with modern hydrogel or silicone-hydrogel daily disposable contact lenses.MethodAt four sites, neophytes (19–32 years) were randomly assigned to an adaptation schedule: fast (10 h wear from the first day) or gradual (4 h on the first day, increasing their wear-time by 2 h on each subsequent day until they had reached 10 h) with hydrogel (n = 24 fast; n = 21 gradual) or silicone-hydrogel (n = 10 fast; n = 10 gradual) contact lenses. Masked investigators graded ocular surface physiology and non-invasive tear breakup time (NIBUT). A range of subjective scores (using 0–100 visual analogue scales) were recorded at the initial visit and after 10 h of lens wear, 4–6 days and 12–14 days after initial fitting. Subjective scores were also repeated after 7 days.ResultsThere was no difference (p > 0.05) in ocular surface physiology between the fast and gradual adaptation groups at any time point in either lens type. NIBUT was similar at all time points for both adaptation groups in both lens types with the exception that the gradual adaptation silicone-hydrogel wearers had a slightly longer NIBUT (p = 0.007) than the fast adaptation group at 12-14 days. Subjective scores were also similar across the visits and lens types with the exception of ‘lens awareness’ and ‘ease of lens removal’ which were better (p < 0.05) in the fast compared with the gradual adaptation hydrogel lens group at day 7. Additionally, ‘end-of-day discomfort’ was better (p = 0.02) in the fast compared with the gradual adaptation hydrogel lens group at 12–14 days.ConclusionThere appears to be no benefit in daily disposable soft contact lens adaptation for neophytes with modern contact lens materials.     

The influence of lens material and lens wear on the removal and viability of Staphylococcus epidermidis

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the influence of lens material and lens wear on the removal capability of Staphylococcus epidermidis. Assessment of viability of remaining adhered bacteria was another goal of this work. Four silicone hydrogel materials (galyfilcon A, balafilcon A, lotrafilcon A, lotrafilcon B) and one conventional hydrogel material (etafilcon A) were assayed. METHODS: Detachment studies on S. epidermidis were carried out in a parallel plate flow chamber. Contact lenses (CLs) were fitted to the bottom of the flow chamber and a bacterial suspension was perfused into the system, promoting bacterial adhesion. Afterwards, detachment was stimulated using a multipurpose solution (MPS, ReNu Multiplus) and the percentage of removed bacteria estimated through microscopic observation and enumeration. Remaining adhered bacteria were stained with propidium iodide (PI) and enumerated in order to assess their viability. Additionally, the worn lenses were observed by confocal laser scanning microscopy (CLSM) to visualize bacterial distribution along the lens surfaces. RESULTS: Bacterial removal was significant (p<0.05) for both unworn and worn galyfilcon A and etafilcon A. Galyfilcon A exhibited a detachment percentage of 59.1 and 63.5 while etafilcon A of 62.6 and 69.3, both for unworn and worn lenses, respectively. As far as bacterial viability is concerned, it was found that worn lenses exhibit a superior amount of non-viable bacteria than unworn CLs. Images obtained by CLSM revealed an irregular bacterial distribution for all lens materials. CONCLUSIONS: It appears that surface and/or bulk structure of the lens material affects removal of S. epidermidis while CL wear influences their viability.     

How often are contact lenses worn?

There are important clinical, academic and commercial reasons for seeking to develop a comprehensive understanding of the frequency of wear of different forms of contact lenses. Data that we have gathered from annual contact lens fitting surveys over the past 12 years demonstrate that contact lenses are worn, on average, 5.4 ± 1.9 days per week. Rigid lenses tended to be worn on a full-time basis, typically seven days per week. The distribution of daily disposable lens wear is bimodal, with peaks at two days and seven days per week of wear. Over the survey period there appears to have been a small trend toward the use of contact lenses on a part-time basis.     

Fast versus gradual adaptation of soft monthly contact lenses in neophyte wearers

AimTo determine if a gradual adaptation period is necessary for neophytes when fitted with modern hydrogel or silicone hydrogel reusable disposable contact lenses.MethodAcross four sites, 74 neophytes (18–28 years) were randomly assigned to a reusable lens cleaned nightly with Opti-Free® Puremoist® multi-purpose contact lens solution: Proclear® (hydrogel) or Biofinity® (silicone hydrogel) and an adaptation schedule: fast (10 h wear from the first day) or gradual (4 h on the first day, increasing their wear time by 2 h on each subsequent day until they had reached 10 h). Masked investigators graded ocular surface physiology and non-invasive tear breakup time (NIBUT) and a range of comfort, vision and lens handling subjective ratings (0–100 visual analogue scales) were recorded at the baseline visit and after 10 h of lens wear, 4–6 days and 12–14 days after lens fitting. Subjective scores were also repeated after 7 days.ResultsThere was no difference (p > 0.05) in ocular surface physiology or NIBUT between fast and gradual adaptation groups at any time point in either lens type with the exception of increased corneal staining (p = 0.019) in the silicone hydrogel fast adaptation group after 4–6 days, but was similar by 12–14 days. Subjective scores were also similar across the visits and lens types with the exception of ‘lens awareness’ (p = 0.019) which was less in the gradual versus the fast adaptation silicone hydrogel lens group at 12–14 days.ConclusionThere seems to be no clinical benefit for recommending a gradual adaptation period in new wearers fitted with modern soft reusable disposable contact lenses. The findings of this work add to a growing body of evidence suggesting that such advice is unnecessary in regular soft contact lens wear, which has important ramifications for the initial clinical management of these patients.     

Corneal epithelial thickness and corneal curvature changes during the day: The effects of daily disposable contact lens wear

PurposeTo evaluate the changes in corneal epithelial thickness and corneal anterior and posterior curvatures during the day, and the effect of wearing daily disposable soft contact lenses.MethodsThirty-two healthy volunteers were enrolled in a randomized crossover study. At the baseline visit, corneal and epithelial thickness maps (OCT; Optovue, Inc., Fremont, CA, USA) and keratometric measurements (Pentacam, Oculus, GmbH, Germany) were performed in the morning and in the afternoon (8 hours after). Then, each subject was fitted with the following brands of daily disposable contact lenses in random order: Dailies Total 1 (Delefilcon A), Dailies Aqua Comfort (Nelfilcon A), TruEye (Narafilcon A) and Biotrue Oneday (Nesofilcon A) on different days. All fitted lenses had a power of −3.00 diopters (D). Measurements were repeated before putting the contact lens on and after an-eight-hour contact lens wear.ResultsWith no lens wear, the anterior topographic indices showed significant steepening [Kflat: p < 0.0001; Ksteep: p < 0.0001 and maximum keratometry value (Kmax): p = 0.04] and the corneal thickness significantly decreased in the central and temporal portion of the cornea in the afternoon. There were no significant changes in the posterior topographical indices and corneal epithelial thickness. With contact lens wear, no significant change occurred in the corneal and epithelial thickness, and the anterior and posterior curvatures during the day (all p values >0.05). There was no statistically significant difference in the epithelial thickness among the groups wearing different contact lens types (p > 0.05).ConclusionsAnterior corneal topographic indices steepen depending on the natural diurnal variations. Daily wear of soft contact lenses appears to mask this steepening. The corneal epithelial thickness is not affected by daily disposable soft contact lenses.     

A 12-month prospective clinical trial of comfilcon A silicone-hydrogel contact lenses worn on a 30-day continuous wear basis.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the clinical performance of comfilcon A (Biofinity) during 12 months of continuous wear compared to other silicone-hydrogel lenses. METHOD: Forty-five subjects were fitted in one eye with the comfilcon A (test) lens. For 22 subjects, the other eye was fitted with lotrafilcon A (group A) and for the remaining 23 subjects the other eye was fitted with balafilcon A (group B). Twelve-month data are presented on 48 measured variables. RESULTS: There were no serious adverse events during the course of the study. A total of 33 subjects completed the study, with only 4 discontinuations for lens-related reasons, spread proportionately between the lenses. On preference scales, the test lens was superior to both control lenses for comfort (p<0.05) and overall preference (p<0.05) and in group A for vision (p<0.05). On grading scales, the test lens scored better than both control lenses for overall comfort (p<0.1 for group A, p<0.05 for group B), comfort during the day (p<0.05), end-of-day comfort (p<0.05) and overall preference (p<0.05), and better in group A for general vision quality (p<0.01), night vision quality (p<0.01) and handling (p<0.05). All lenses performed to a comparable degree on the basis of microcysts and corneal staining. There were significant differences between lenses in producing limbal redness (p<0.05), bulbar conjunctival hyperemia (p<0.1) and conjunctival NaFl staining (p<0.01) with the control lens in group A showing the greatest effect and the control lens in group B the least. CONCLUSION: Comfilcon A offers performance advantages over first generation silicone-hydrogel materials for continuous wear.     

Chromatic dispersion of soft contact lens materials

PurposeTo investigate and evaluate the chromatic dispersion of various hydrogel and silicon hydrogel contact lens materials.MethodsEighteen different soft contact lens materials with high and low water content in lens power of −1.00 DS were measured by one operator at temperature of 20 °C ± 0.5° soaked in ISO standard phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) and in their respective packaging solutions (PS). An analogue Abbe refractometer (Model Zuzi 320, AUXILAB, S.L., Navarra, Spain) was used for refractive index (RI) measurements at 5 different wavelengths. All contact lenses were presented in a random and masked order to the operator. The Bland-Altman method with 95 % limits of agreement (LoA) and coefficient of repeatability (CoR) was used to characterise the repeatability of refractive index measurements. The Abbe numbers for each material were calculated by entering the measured and interpolated refractive indices into the Abbe number equation. One-way ANOVA analysis was used to test if there were significant differences between the 5 different wavelengths (470 nm–680 nm) within each material. An unpaired t-test was used to determine if there were differences in refractive index or dispersion between packaging solution and PBS results.ResultsNelfilcon A (Dailies Aqua Comfort Plus) soaked in PS showed the best repeatability of all 18 examined soft contact lenses across all wavelengths with an average refractive index of 1.3848 for all 6 contact lenses with a standard deviation of 0.00064. The 95 % limits of agreement were between 1.3835 and 1.3860. The mean coefficient of repeatability for nelfilcon A was 0.00125. For contact lenses soaked in ISO Standard PBS comfilcon A (Biofinity) had the best repeatability. The average refractive index of all 6 contact lenses was 1.4041 with a standard deviation of 0.00031 and a coefficient of repeatability of 0.00060. The 95 % limits of agreement were between 1.4035 and 1.4047. The analysis with One-way ANOVA with multiple comparisons involving Holm-Sidak post-hoc, showed that there are significant differences (p < 0.001, F_ratio = 376.2 between wavelengths and F_ratio = 1559 between different refractive indices) in the refractive index of most common lens materials across the visible wavelength range. Based on unpaired t-test, there is no significant difference (p > 0.05) in the Abbe numbers of the tested lens materials whether they have been placed in the packaging solution or in standard PBS (p > 0.05, 95 % CI = −4.8070 to 5.8680, t = 0.2054). The Abbe numbers for the calculated contact lenses soaked in PS ranged between 43.7 and 89.9. For contact lenses stored in PBS the range was between 46.3 and 81.6.ConclusionThere is a good repeatability between repeated RI measurements taken from the same lens and from the same material. The significant differences between the refractive indices across the 5 different wavelengths showed the presence of chromatic dispersion in the 18 evaluated soft contact lens materials. Furthermore, it could be shown that there is no significant difference in dispersion whether the contact lenses are soaked in standard PBS or in their respective packaging solutions. With no other published data available as a reference, absolute accuracy of the calculated Abbe numbers remains to be confirmed, however, this study did confirm that significant chromatic dispersion exists in soft contact lens materials.     

The influence of surface treatment on hydrophobicity, protein adsorption and microbial colonisation of silicone hydrogel contact lenses.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the influence of surface treatment of silicone-hydrogel CL on lens hydrophobicity, protein adsorption and microbial colonisation by studying several silicone hydrogel contact lenses (CL) with and without surface treatment. The lenses used in this study were Balafilcon A, Lotrafilcon A, Lotrafilcon B and Galyfilcon A. A conventional hydrogel CL (Etafilcon A) was also tested. METHODS: Hydrophobicity was determined through contact angle measurement using the advancing type technique on air. The type and quantity of proteins adsorbed were assessed through SDS-PAGE and fluorescence spectroscopy, respectively. Microbial colonisation was studied by removing the microbes from the lenses through sonication, and counting the colony-forming units on agar plates. RESULTS: Regarding hydrophobicity, both surface and non-surface-treated silicone hydrogel CL were found to be hydrophobic, and the conventional hydrogel CL was found to be hydrophilic. Concerning protein adsorption, different protein profiles were observed on the several lenses tested. Nevertheless, the presence of proteins with the same molecular weight as lysozyme and lactoferrin was common to all lenses, which is probably related to their abundance in tears. In terms of total protein adsorption, silicone hydrogel CL did not exhibit any differences between themselves. However, the conventional hydrogel Etafilcon A adsorbed a larger amount of proteins. Regarding microbial colonisation, Balafilcon A exhibited the greatest amount of colonising microbes, which can be due to its superior hydrophobicity and higher electron acceptor capacity. CONCLUSION: This study suggests that silicone hydrogel lenses adsorb a lower amount of proteins than the conventional hydrogel lenses and that this phenomenon is independent of the presence of surface treatment. Concerning microbial colonisation, the surface treated Balafilcon A, exhibited a greater propensity, a fact that may compromise the lens wearer's ocular health.     

The short-term effect of contact lens wear on blink characteristics

PurposeThe aim of this pilot study was to investigate the initial effect of contact lens wear on spontaneous blink characteristics.MethodsThis was a randomised, crossover pilot study. Spontaneous blinking was recorded using a high-speed infrared camera in ten subjects with three different soft contact lenses (spherical hydrogel, spherical silicone hydrogel and toric hydrogel), one rigid contact lens and without contact lenses. Custom semi-automated software was used to determine palpebral aperture height, interblink interval (IBI), blink speed, blink completeness and blink duration.ResultsThe IBI was significantly greater for non-lens wear compared with the silicone hydrogel [ratio (95% CI): 1.34 (1.16, 1.55), p < 0.0001], toric hydrogel [1.28 (1.10, 1.48), p = 0.0001] and rigid corneal lenses [1.48 (1.27, 1.73), p < 0.0001]. The spherical silicone hydrogel lens showed greater closing-phase speed than non-lens wear [mean difference (95% CI): 27.4 (5.6, 49.1) mm/s, p = 0.006]. Shorter total blink duration was found for non-lens wear compared with any of the lens types [spherical hydrogel: ratio 0.89 (0.81, 0.98), p = 0.01; spherical silicone hydrogel: 0.87 (0.80, 0.95), p = 0.0001; toric hydrogel: 0.90 (0.83, 0.98), p = 0.004; and rigid corneal: 0.88 (0.82, 0.96), p = 0.0004]. Opening-phase speed (p = 0.12) and blink completeness metrics (all p > 0.5) were not influenced by wearing condition.ConclusionThis work showed that short-term contact lens wear influenced the palpebral aperture height, IBI, speed and duration of the blink, and the effect is dependent on the contact lens type. The completeness of the blink was not altered by contact lens wear. Future work should be conducted to assess the effect of long-term wear of different contact lens types on blink characteristics. The measurement of spontaneous blinking characteristics represents an immediate, sensitive and non-invasive evaluation of the impact of a contact lens on the ocular surface.     

Adverse events with silicone hydrogel continuous wear.

High Dk silicone hydrogel lenses have overcome many of the hypoxic problems associated with traditional extended wear and the popularity of continuous wear (up to 30 nights) with these lens types is increasing. Results from clinical trials indicate that the typical physiological changes associated with edema from conventional extended wear of low Dk/t lenses do not occur with continuous wear of silicone hydrogel lenses. These changes include neovascularization, striae, microcysts and an increase in bulbar and limbal hyperemia. It is perhaps not surprising though that a number of adverse events do still occur with silicone hydrogel lenses when they are worn on a continuous wear basis. These include inflammatory conditions such as contact lens-induced peripheral ulcers (CLPU), contact lens-induced acute red eye (CLARE), infiltrative keratitis (IK) and contact lens papillary conjunctivitis (CLPC). Other events such as superior epithelial arcuate lesions (SEAL) and localised CLPC may be due to mechanical influences. While these conditions are not sight threatening, they may be painful and are certainly inconvenient to both the patient and the practitioner. It is therefore very important that the signs and symptoms associated with these events be recognised in order that they may be accurately identified and appropriately managed. The purpose of this review article is to describe the pathophysiology, etiology, and clinical presentation of these adverse events when observed with continuous wear contact lenses and to discuss their associated risk factors and incidence. Clear management and treatment strategies are also presented and a number of approaches to minimize adverse events with continuous wear of silicone hydrogel contact lenses are suggested.     

Changes in water content of high plus hydrogel lenses worn on an extended wear basis in a geriatric aphakic population.

PURPOSE: To investigate the water content of hydrogel lenses of relatively high plus power hydrogel lenses after 3 months extended wear and compare values with unused lenses. METHOD: Geriatric aphakic extended wear soft lens patients were fitted with one of four different brands of hydrogel lenses (A) Incanto 78 (Cantor and Nissel, UK), (B) PSL72 (Prospect lenses, UK), (C) ES70 (Ocular Sciences), (D) Proclear (Coopervision). After 3 months continuous wear the lens was removed and water content (WC) was determined at both lens surfaces using an Abbé refractometer. The water content was also measured for 40 unused lenses (+10 to +20D, 10 lenses per brand). RESULTS: One hundred and thirty-two lenses were checked after 3 months extended wear. Mean (+/-S.D.) WC values for front (f) and back (b) surfaces of worn and unworn lenses were, respectively, (A) Worn (n=45): f 73.2(4.13) b 73.8(4.33); unworn f 80.5(0.68) b 81.1 (0.80). (B) Worn (n=37); f 70.5(4.49) b 70.9 (3.89); unworn f 72.5(0.94) b 72.3 (0.89). (C) Worn (n=34); f 68.3(3.18) b 68.4(3.63); unworn f 70.6 (0.48) b 71.1 (0.55). (D) Worn (n=16); f 63.4(3.68) b 63.3(3.19); unworn f 60.9 (1.56) b 61.5 (1.92). There was a significant correlation between WC measured from front and back surfaces (p < 0.01). In worn A-C lenses, front surface WC tended to be lower than back surface WC. For lenses A and C at both surfaces the WC of worn lenses was significantly lower than unworn lenses (p < 0.05). For lens D, mean WC of worn lenses was significantly higher than unworn lenses (p < 0.05). In 80% of B lenses, surface WC of worn lenses were significantly lower than WC of unworn lenses (p < 0.05). There was no relationship between WC and lens power. CONCLUSION: On average, A and C lenses tended to desiccate but D lenses tended to swell as did 20% of B lenses. The front surface of worn lenses measured lower water content than the back surface suggesting the front surface is drier than the back. This apparent difference in water content between the surfaces could be an artefact emanating from differential rates of surface deposition.     

Objective evaluation of static and dynamic behavior of different toric silicone-hydrogel contact lenses

PurposeThe present study aimed to estimate how orientation position, recovery time, and contact lens decentration, associated with visual performance, may vary on several designs of the most recent toric silicone-hydrogel toric contact lenses in two-time different moments.MethodsTo evaluate the toric silicone-hydrogel toric contact lens position and stability, it was conducted with a prospective, observational, randomized, and single-center case series including 95 astigmatic eyes wearing four toric silicone-hydrogel toric contact lenses for two weeks. Orientation and decentration were analyzed with ImageJ software from video-frames extracted with a Python application. Recovery time was evaluated after 45 degrees of inferior-temporal misorientation.ResultsEvaluation of misorientation after 20 min of wear revealed the highest amount for Saphir RX, −20.41 ± 10.84 deg, and lowest for Air Optix Aqua for Astigmatism, −1.43 ± 7.48 deg. The highest horizontal misalignment was found for Air Optix Aqua for Astigmatism, −0.627 ± 0.330 mm, and lowest for Biofinity Toric, 0.004 ± 0.270 mm. Vertical misalignment presented the highest value for Acuvue Vita for Astigmatism, −0.652 ± 0.369 mm, and lowest for Air Optix Aqua for Astigmatism, −0.126 ± 0.231 mm. Recovery time showed the highest amount for Saphir RX, 80.70 ± 33.26 s, and lowest for Biofinity Toric 43.67 ± 23.70 s. Only Air Optix Aqua for Astigmatism presented significant differences after two-week of wear for misorientation (P = 0.02) and horizontal misalignment (P < 0.001). When pairwise comparisons are made between toric silicone-hydrogel toric contact lenses, significant differences (P < 0.001) are found.ConclusionsAlthough there was acceptable fitting, based upon decentration, orientation, and recovery with the study contact lenses, the stabilization and profile design used in the Air Optix Aqua for Astigmatism helped to minimize rotation and vertical misalignment. In addition, the peri-ballast and thickness profile of the Biofinity Toric improved rotational recovery and horizontal misalignment compared to the other contact lenses. Finally, lenses with a better fitting profile showed better visual performance.     

Hydrogel contact lens-induced corneal warpage.

BACKGROUND: Although contact lens-induced corneal warpage is most frequently associated with PMMA lenses, approximately 27% of reported cases of corneal warpage have been attributed to hydrogel lens wear. The change in corneal contour may be the result of either mechanical deformation, chronic metabolic insult, or a combination of mechanical and metabolic challenges. Limited oxygen transmissibility through some hydrogel lenses may lead to chronic hypoxia and acidosis. These metabolic challenges can change corneal physiology sufficiently to cause clinically significant corneal warpage. CASE REPORTS: Three cases of hydrogel contact lens-induced corneal warpage are presented. In all three cases, cessation of lens wear led to restoration of the normal corneal contour and visual acuity. All patients were refit with more oxygen-permeable lenses, and have successfully resumed wearing contact lenses. CONCLUSION: Certain individuals who wear hydrogel contact lenses can experience corneal warpage. Clinical signs of corneal warpage include changes in refractive error, decreased visual acuity with spectacle correction, and changes in corneal topography. Serial topography is useful to monitor the cornea to resolution of the condition. Contact lenses with higher oxygen transmissibility will frequently alleviate the relative hypoxia that may be associated with corneal warpage.     

Refractive index of rigid contact lens materials.

A simple hand-held refractometer was used to measure the refractive index of 27 rigid gas permeable contact lens materials. As a general rule, lenses with refractive indices lower than 1.458 are made from fluorosilicone acrylates; lenses with refractive indices in the range of 1.458 to 1.469 are made from either fluorosilicone acrylates or silicone acrylates; and lenses with refractive indices greater than 1.469 are made from silicone acrylates. It is demonstrated how refractometry can be used by contact lens practitioners for the identification and verification of rigid contact lenses.     

Acanthamoeba keratitis associated with misuse of daily disposable contact lenses.

PURPOSE: To report a case of Acanthamoeba keratitis that occurred in a daily disposable contact lens wearer. METHOD: Case report. RESULTS: A 70-year-old gentleman presented to eye casualty with a red left eye with reduced vision and corneal epithelial changes. Acanthamoeba keratitis was not suspected initially as he was a daily disposable contact lens wearer. This led to a delay of 17 days in initiating treatment. He responded well to topical polyhexamethylene biguanide and propamidine and made a full recovery. CONCLUSION: Acanthamoeba keratitis can occur in patients who reuse daily disposable contact lenses. A diagnosis of Acanthamoeba keratitis can be difficult to make and should be considered in all patients who wear contact lenses, including daily disposable lenses. All patients who wear daily disposable contact lenses should be reminded that the benefits of this modality of contact lens are only possible if the lenses are worn once and thrown away.     

The effect of contact lens wear on dynamic ocular surface temperature.

AIM: To determine the dynamic emitted temperature changes of the anterior eye during and immediately after wearing different materials and modalities of soft contact lenses. METHOD: A dynamic, non-contact infrared camera (Thermo-Tracer TH7102MX, NEC San-ei) was used to record the ocular surface temperature (OST) in 48 subjects (mean age 21.7 +/- 1.9 years) wearing: lotrafilcon-A contact lenses on a daily wear (LDW; n=8) or continuous wear (LCW; n=8) basis; balafilcon-A contact lenses on a daily wear (BDW; n=8) or continuous wear (BCW; n=8) basis; etafilcon-A contact lenses on a daily disposable regimen (EDW; n=8); and no lenses (controls; n=8). OST was measured continuously five times, for 8s after a blink, following a minimum of 2h wear and immediately following lens removal. Absolute temperature, changes in temperature post-blink and the dynamics of temperature changes were calculated. RESULTS: OST immediately following contact lens wear was significantly greater compared to non-lens wearers (37.1 +/- 1.7 degrees C versus 35.0 +/- 1.1 degrees C; p < 0.005), predominantly in the LCW group (38.6 +/- 1.0 degrees C; p < 0.0001). Lens surface temperature was highly correlated (r=0.97) to, but lower than OST (by -0.62 +/- 0.3 degrees C). There was no difference with modality of wear (DW 37.5 +/- 1.6 degrees C versus CW 37.8+/-1.9 degrees C; p=0.63), but significant differences were found between etafilcon A and silicone hydrogel lens materials (35.3 +/- 1.1 degrees C versus 37.5 +/- 1.5 degrees C; p < 0.0005). Ocular surface cooling following a blink was not significantly affected by contact lens wear with (p=0.07) or without (p=0.47) lenses in situ. CONCLUSIONS: Ocular surface temperature is greater with hydrogel and greater still with silicone hydrogel contact lenses in situ, regardless of modality of wear. The effect is likely to be due to the thermal transmission properties of a contact lens.     

Proposed performance criteria for extended wear contact lenses.

The introduction of silicone-hydrogel materials has changed expectations for the response to contact lenses used in extended wear. In keeping with this technology shift, we have re-evaluated the criteria by which practitioners judge the performance of extended wear lenses. Attendees at the 1999 Annual Clinical Conference of the British Contact Lens Association were surveyed. The proportion of respondents who considered it appropriate to fit selected patients with conventional, disposable and silicone-hydrogel soft lenses for extended wear was 63%, 67% and 86%, respectively. Only 11% of respondents did not fit extended wear because of personal experience with infectious keratitis, and over 50% relied on educators' advice in avoiding this practice. Fifteen per cent of practitioners reported fitting extended wear on occasions. Ninety-five per cent of respondents thought that the relative risk of infectious keratitis with daily wear compared with no lens wear should be ten or less, which was reduced to 60% when it was revealed that the current relative risk is estimated to be 60. A strong preference for a relative risk of infection with extended wear compared to daily wear of less than five times was indicated, which is consistent with current estimates. A minority of respondents were prepared to accept an overnight oedema level of over 6% with extended wear, although silicone-hydrogel materials have been shown to induce less than 4%. A wide variety of microcyst responses were considered reasonable, with many respondents accepting up to 40 per cornea; again, this result contrasted with early research data suggesting a level of 10 microcysts or less occurring with silicone-hydrogel materials. Interpretation of these findings has led us to the following proposals for safe extended wear: (i) extended wear fitting should preferably be done with silicone-hydrogel materials, rather than conventional hydrogels, where the available parameter ranges overlap; (ii) the relative risk of corneal infection with extended wear compared to daily wear should be two to five times, providing the relative risk of daily wear compared to the no lens wear'situation is reduced to 20 times, and (iii) extended wear lenses should produce an average of no more than 4% overnight oedema and no more than 10 microcysts per eye in the long term.     

Use of silicone hydrogel material for daily wear.

Silicone hydrogel contact lenses were initially developed to optimise oxygen transmissibility for extended wear use. The concerns with such contact lenses have been their higher elastomeric and hydrophobic characteristics associated with the incorporation of silicone type monomers. The use of silicone hydrogel has most recently been suggested for daily wear to eliminate all hypoxic related problems. The primary aim of the investigation was to test in vivo wetting performance and subjective acceptance of the first silicone hydrogel contact lens developed for daily wear, ACUVUE ADVANCE with HYDRACLEAR (galyfilcon A), compared to a conventional hydrogel contact lens for the same application SofLens 66 (alphafilcon A). The investigation was a randomised, subject masked bilateral cross over investigation testing of the two contact lens materials over their approved replacement periods (galyfilcon A 2 weeks and alphafilcon A 2 weeks (USA) and 4 weeks (Europe)). In all cases ReNu Multiplus lens care system was used. The investigation carried out on 24 contact lens wearers showed that: (i) in vivo wettability was superior for galyfilcon A which had a thicker lipid layer (thin layer incidence: galyfilcon A 54%; alphafilcon A 70-86%, p<0.05), a thicker aqueous layer (thick layer incidence: galyfilcon A 88%; alphafilcon A 35-64%, p<0.05) and a more stable tear film (galyfilcon A 7.8s; alphafilcon A 2 weeks 5.6s, p=0.022; 4 weeks 7.4s, p=0.276); (ii) for the intended replacement period, comfort was better with galyfilcon A (2 weeks) compared to alphafilcon A (4 weeks) at insertion (p=0.001) and, throughout the day (daytime and evening p=0.008). Contact lenses made from galyfilcon A and replaced two weekly achieved better in vivo wettability than contact lenses made from alphafilcon A and replaced either two and four weekly; the better wettability was associated with an overall better comfort for galyfilcon A.     

Changes in visual quality with soft contact lenses after the instillation of hyaluronic acid eye drops

PurposeTo evaluate the changes in visual function and anterior surface aberrations during soft contact lens (SCL) wear after the instillation of hyaluronic acid (HA) eye drops with different viscosity.MethodsA prospective, randomized, and participant-masked study was performed. Twenty healthy participants (25.4 ± 2.6 years) were evaluated. Hydrogel (Ocufilcon D) and silicone-hydrogel (Somofilcon A) SCL were randomly assigned to both eyes of the same participant. Visual function in terms of high- and low-contrast corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA) and anterior contact lens surface aberrations (RMS HOA) were measured before and after the instillation, at different times, of different eye drops: saline (control) and 0.1%, 0.2%, and 0.3% HA.ResultsCompared with the saline solution, during hydrogel SCL wear, there was an improvement (P < 0.05) in high-contrast CDVA after 3 and 10 min with 0.1% HA, and after 5 and 20 min with 0.2% HA. During silicone-hydrogel SCL wear, there was a deterioration (P < 0.05) in high-contrast CDVA after 1 and 30 min with 0.3% HA. Additionally, during silicone-hydrogel SCL wear, there was also a deterioration (P < 0.05) in low-contrast CDVA after 5 and 20 min with 0.3% HA. In terms of RMS HOA, there were no clinically relevant changes with both SCL.ConclusionsThe instillation of HA eye drops could have a different effect on visual quality depending on their concentration of HA, the contact lens material, its surface ionicity, or other physicochemical properties that should be studied in future studies.