Comparisons of apparent mass responses of human subjects seated on rigid and elastic seats under vertical vibration

The apparent mass (AM) responses of human body seated on elastic seat, without and with a vertical back support, are measured using a seat pressure sensing mat under three levels of vertical vibration (0.25, 0.50 and 0.75 m/s² rms acceleration) in 0.50–20 Hz frequency range. The responses were also measured with a rigid seat using the pressure mat and a force plate in order to examine the validity of the pressure mat. The pressure mat resulted in considerably lower AM magnitudes compared to the force plate. A correction function was proposed and applied, which resulted in comparable AM from both measurement systems for the rigid seat. The correction function was subsequently applied to derive AM of subjects seated on elastic seat. The responses revealed lower peak magnitude and corresponding frequency compared to those measured with rigid seat, irrespective of back support and excitation considered.     

Whole-body vertical biodynamic response characteristics of the seated vehicle driver: Measurement and model development

The vertical driving-point mechanical impedance characteristics applicable to seated vehicle drivers are measured in the 0.625–10 Hz frequency range with excitation amplitudes ranging from 1.0 to 2.0 m s⁻² using a whole-body vehicular vibration simulator. The measurements are performed for seated subjects with feet supported and hands held in a driving position. Variations in the seated posture, backrest angle, and nature and amplitude of the vibration excitation are introduced within a prescribed range of likely conditions to illustrate their influence on the driving-point mechanical impedance of seated vehicle drivers. Within the 0.75–10 Hz frequency range and for excitation amplitudes maintained below 4 m s⁻², a four-degree-of-freedom linear driver model is proposed for which the parameters are estimated to satisfy both the measured driving-point mechanical impedance and the seat-to-head transmissibility characteristics defined from a synthesis of published data for subjects seated erect without backrest support. The parameter identification technique involves the solution of a multivariable optimization function comprising the sum of squared magnitude and phase errors associated with both the mechanical impedance and seat-to-head transmissibility target values, subject to limit constraints identified from the anthropometric and biomechanical data. The model response, however, is found to provide a closer agreement with the mechanical impedance target values than that with the seat-to-head transmissibility. From the model, the main body resonant frequencies computed on the basis of both biodynamic response functions are found to be within close bounds to that expected for the human body.

Relevance to industry

The development of an appropriate analytical seated vehicle driver model should provide means of estimating the forces and motions being transmitted within the body under specific vehicular vibration environments. Furthermore, its use in conjunction with a corresponding model for the vehicle seat should allow the prediction of the driver's vibration exposure levels and the seat's ability to attenuate the vibration in particular vehicles.     

Effects of elastic seats on seated body apparent mass responses to vertical whole body vibration

Apparent mass (AM) responses of the body seated with and without a back support on three different elastic seats (flat and contoured polyurethane foam (PUF) and air cushion) and a rigid seat were measured under three levels of vertical vibration (overall rms acceleration: 0.25, 0.50 and 0.75 m/s²) in the 0.5 to 20 Hz range. A pressure-sensing system was used to capture biodynamic force at the occupant-seat interface. The results revealed strong effects of visco-elastic and vibration transmissibility characteristics of seats on AM. The response magnitudes with the relatively stiff air seat were generally higher than those with the PUF seats except at low frequencies. The peak magnitude decreased when sitting condition was changed from no back support to a vertical support; the reduction however was more pronounced with the air seat. Further, a relatively higher frequency shift was evident with soft seat compared with stiff elastic seat with increasing excitation.     

Fore-and-aft and dual-axis vibration of the seated human body: Nonlinearity,cross-axis coupling,and associations between resonances in the transmissibility and apparent mass

This study examined how the apparent mass and transmissibility of the human body depend on the magnitude of fore-and-aft vibration excitation and the presence of vertical vibration. Fore-and-aft and vertical acceleration at five locations along the spine, and pitch acceleration at the pelvis, were measured in 12 seated male subjects during fore-and-aft random vibration excitation (0.25–20 Hz) at three vibration magnitudes (0.25, 0.5 and 1.0 ms⁻² r.m.s.). With the greatest magnitude of fore-and-aft excitation, vertical vibration was added at 0.25, 0.5, or 1.0 ms⁻² r.m.s. Forces in the fore-and-aft and vertical directions on the seat surface were measured to calculate apparent masses. Transmissibilities and apparent masses during fore-and-aft excitation showed a principal resonance around 1 Hz and a secondary resonance around 2–3 Hz. Increasing the magnitude of fore-and-aft excitation, or adding vertical excitation, decreased the magnitudes of the resonances. At the primary resonance frequency, the dominant mode induced by fore-and-aft excitation involved bending of the lumbar spine and the lower thoracic spine with shear deformation of tissues at the ischial tuberosities. The relative contributions to this mode from each body segment (especially the pelvis and the lower thoracic spine) varied with vibration magnitude. The nonlinearities in the apparent mass and transmissibility during dual-axis excitation indicate coupling between the principal mode of the seated human body excited by fore-and-aft excitation and the cross-axis influence of vertical excitation.Relevance to industryUnderstanding movements of the body during exposure to whole-body vibration can assist the optimisation of seating dynamics and help to control the effects of the vibration on human comfort, performance, and health. This study suggests cross-axis nonlinearity in biodynamic responses to vibration should be considered when optimising vibration environments.     

Human–seat interface analysis of upper and lower body weight distribution

The human–seat interfaces were analyzed to determine the differential distribution of the body weight to the components of seat. Fifteen volunteers were tested on a simulated seat system with two piezoelectric force platforms, one placed as chair seat pan and the other placed on the floor surface as footrest. The seated configurations included back inclines (75° and 80°), upright (90°) and reclines (95°, 105° and 115°), absence or presence of armrest (adjusted at 62–68 cm of height), forward and backward sloping of the seat pan, and supported and unsupported back. The armrest and backrest assemblies were isolated from the force platforms. The difference in the body weight (kgf) to the sum of forces recorded at seat pan and feet yielded the extent of weight transferred to other features (e.g., backrest and armrest). The weight distributed at seat was 10–12% less at back inclines (p<0.01) as compared to upright unsupported sitting. With the backrest reclined beyond 95°, the weight at seat gradually decreased by 9% at 115° recline. The load distributed at feet varied narrowly; however, it was significantly greater (p<0.01) at upright supported back, compared to unsupported back. The height of the armrest was optimized at 68 cm, since the weight distribution at seat pan consistently reduced by 12% at that height, as compared to the absence of armrest (F_(4,524)=8.80, p<0.05). The suggested height of the armrest corresponded to 40% of the body stature of the selected volunteers. The load distributed at feet was 18% greater with the presence of armrest, indicating that a part of the weight of the upper leg fell on the seat pan, when the armrest was absent. The weight fell on the seat in slouch posture was 5% less than in upright sitting, while the weight at feet was marginally higher in slouch than in upright posture. The study maintained that the horizontal as well as 5° forward slope of the seat might be the preferred choice, since the load distributed at seat was highest at backward sloping seat for all conditions of supported and unsupported back. The study reaffirms that the backrest and armrest have conjoint influence in reducing the load distributed at seat, which in turn might help in mitigating stress on the spinal and other paraspinal structures.

Relevance to Industry

The human–seat interface analysis and understanding of body weight distribution to the components of seat may be beneficial for ergo-design application in optimizing parameters for chair configurations that provide comfort and safety to the user.     

Finite element modelling of human-seat interactions: vertical in-line and fore-and-aft cross-axis apparent mass when sitting on a rigid seat without backrest and exposed to vertical vibration

Biodynamic models representing distributed human-seat interactions can assist seat design. This study sought to develop a finite element (FE) model representing the soft tissues of the body supported by seating and the vertical in-line apparent mass and the fore-and-aft cross-axis apparent mass of the seated human body during vertical vibration excitation. The model was developed with rigid parts representing the torso segments, skeletal structures (pelvis and femurs) and deformable parts representing the soft tissues of the buttocks and the thighs. The model had three vibration modes at frequencies less than 15 Hz and provided reasonable vertical in-line apparent mass and fore-and-aft cross-axis apparent mass. The model can be developed to represent dynamic interactions between the body and a seat over a seat surface (e.g. dynamic pressure distributions and variations in seat transmissibility over the seat surface).     

Determination of reference values of apparent mass responses of seated occupants of different body masses under vertical vibration with and without a back support

The biodynamic response of human body seated without a back support and exposed to vertical whole-body vibration have been standardized in ISO 5982 and DIN 45676 in terms of driving-point mechanical impedance and apparent mass. A comparison of ranges defined in two standards, however, reveal considerable differences in both the magnitude and phase. Greater differences are more evident for the three body mass groups, which suggests the lack of adequate reference values of biodynamic responses of seated human subjects of different body masses. In this experimental study, the biodynamic responses of seated humans within three different body mass ranges are characterized under different magnitudes of vibration and three different sitting postures in an attempt to define reference values of apparent mass for applications in mechanical-equivalent model development and anthropodynamic manikin design. Laboratory measurements were performed with adult male subjects of total body mass in the vicinity of 55, 75 and 98 kg (nine subjects for each mass group) seated with and without an inclined back support and exposed to three different magnitudes of white-noise vertical vibration (0.5, 1.0 and 2.0 m/s² unweighted rms acceleration) in the frequency range between 0.5 and 20 Hz. The measured data were analyzed to derive the mean magnitude and phase responses for the three body masses, posture and excitation conditions. The mean magnitude responses of subjects within three mass groups were compared with idealized ranges defined in ISO 5982 and mean values described in DIN 45676 for no back support condition. The results revealed significant differences between the mean measured and standardized magnitudes, suggesting that the current standardized values do not describe the biodynamic responses of seated occupant of different masses even for the back not supported condition. The mean measured responses revealed most important effect of body mass, irrespective of the sitting posture. The reference values of apparent mass responses of seated body subject to vertical whole-body vibration are thus defined for three mass groups and different back support conditions that may be considered applicable for ranges of excitations considered. The responses of the body seated without a back support, also revealed notable influences of excitation magnitude, particularly on the primary peak frequencies.     

Subjective response of standing persons exposed to fore-aft,lateral and vertical whole-body vibration

The aims of this study were to propose multiply scale factors for evaluation of discomfort of standing persons and to investigate whether there exist differences between multiplying factors used for evaluation of discomfort of standing persons and those of seated persons exposed to WBV. Twelve male subjects were exposed to twenty-seven stimuli that comprise three acceleration magnitudes (0.2, 0.4, and 0.8 m/s² r.m.s.) along fore-aft (x), lateral (y) or vertical (z) direction. The subjects with seated or standing posture on the platform of the vibration test rig rated the subjective discomfort for each stimulus that has frequency contents ranging from 1.0 Hz to 20 Hz with a constant power spectrum density. The order of presentation of the test stimuli was fully randomized and each stimulus was repeated three times. The subjective scale for discomfort was calculated by using the category judgment method. The best combinations of multiplying factors were determined by calculating correlation coefficients of regression curves in-between subjective ratings and vibration magnitudes. In all the directions, body posture significantly influenced on subjective discomfort scales. Particularly in the fore-aft and lateral direction, the upper limit of all the categories for the standing posture resulted in higher vibration acceleration magnitudes than those for the seated posture. In contrast, in the vertical direction, only the upper limit of category “1: Not uncomfortable” for standing posture was observed to be higher than that for seated posture. The best agreement for ISO-weighted vibration acceleration occurred at x factor of 1.8 and y factor of 1.8 in the standing posture and x factor of 2.8 and y factor of 1.8 in the seated posture. The results suggest that seated people respond more sensitively and severely in perception of discomfort to fore-aft and lateral vibration than standing people do while standing people respond more sensitively and severely to vertical vibration than seated people do. Thus the effects of body postures on multiplying factors should be considered in evaluation of discomfort caused by whole-body vibration.Relevance to industryThis study reports differences in subjective response of standing persons to fore-aft, lateral and vertical whole-body vibration. The results obtained in this study propose the fundamental data on the sensitivity to whole-body vibration exposed with standing posture.     

Response of the seated human body to whole-body vertical vibration: discomfort caused by sinusoidal vibration

Frequency weightings for predicting vibration discomfort assume the same frequency-dependence at all magnitudes of vibration, whereas biodynamic studies show that the frequency-dependence of the human body depends on the magnitude of vibration. This study investigated how the frequency-dependence of vibration discomfort depends on the acceleration and the force at the subject–seat interface. Using magnitude estimation, 20 males and 20 females judged their discomfort caused by sinusoidal vertical acceleration at 13 frequencies (1–16 Hz) at magnitudes from 0.1 to 4.0 ms^? 2 r.m.s. The frequency-dependence of their equivalent comfort contours depended on the magnitude of vibration, but was less dependent on the magnitude of dynamic force than the magnitude of acceleration, consistent with the biodynamic non-linearity of the body causing some of the magnitude-dependence of equivalent comfort contours. There were significant associations between the biodynamic responses and subjective responses at all frequencies in the range 1–16 Hz.

Practitioner Summary: Vertical seat vibration causes discomfort in many forms of transport. This study provides the frequency-dependence of vibration discomfort over a range of vibration magnitudes and shows how the frequency weightings in the current standards can be improved.     

The effect of posture and vibration magnitude on the vertical vibration transmissibility of tractor suspension system

The efficiency of suspension seat can be influenced by several factors such as the input vibration, the dynamic characteristics of the seat and the dynamic characteristics of the human body. The objective of this paper is to study the effect of sitting postures and vibration magnitude on the vibration transmissibility of a suspension system of an agricultural tractor seat. Eleven (11) healthy male subjects participated in the study. All subjects were asked to sit on the suspension system. Four (4) different sitting postures were investigated – i) “relax”, ii) “slouch”, iii) “tense”, and iv) “with backrest support”. All subjects were exposed to random vertical vibration in the range of 1–20 Hz, at three vibration magnitudes - 0.5, 1.0 and 2.0 m/s² r.m.s for 60 s. The results showed that there were three pronounced peaks in the seat transmissibility, with the primary resonance was found at 1.75–2.5 Hz for every sitting postures. The “backrest” condition had the highest transmissibility resonance (1.46), while the “slouch” posture had the highest Seat Effective Amplitude Transmissibility (SEAT) values (64.7%). Changes in vibration magnitude for “relax” posture from 0.5 to 2.0 m/s² r.m.s resulted in greater reduction in the primary resonance frequency of seat transmissibility. The SEAT values decreased with increased vibration magnitude. It can be suggested that variations in posture and vibration magnitude affected the vibration transmission through the suspension system, indicating the non-linear effect on the interaction between the human body and the suspension system.Relevance to industry: Investigating the posture adopted during agricultural activities, and the effects of various magnitudes of vibration on the suspension system's performance are beneficial to the industry. The findings regarding their influence on the human body may be used to optimize the suspension system's performance.     

Vibration attenuation performance of suspension seats for off-road forestry vehicles

Four different types of vertical suspension seats were evaluated in the laboratory and in the field in order to measure their adaptability for attenuating whole-body vibration in log skidders used in the forest industry. Laboratory testing first consisted of determining the static and dynamic characteristics of the seats such as the static stiffness of the cushions and suspension systems and the hysteresis parameters and damping properties of the cushions. The vibration attenuation characteristics of the seats were then measured using a laboratory test rig simulating a driver work station. The influence of amplitude of excitation and the variations in seat height on the vibration attenuation performance of the suspension seats was evaluated for sinusoidal excitations in the frequency range of 0.2–8.0 Hz. The seats were then field tested during normal skidding operations to determine their vertical transmissibility characteristics and to compare the vibration exposure that results from operating a skidder while being equipped with a suspended seat, as opposed to having an unsuspended one. There was generally good agreement between the transmissibility characteristics measured in the laboratory and in the field. The results of vibration transmissibility and exposure are helpful in identifying one of the suspension seats as being the most appropriate for attenuating vertical whole-body vibration on skidders, while conforming at the same time to the basic dimensional characteristics and stability required for safe operation of such vehicles.     

A study of hand grip pressure distribution and EMG of finger flexor muscles under dynamic loads

A matrix of miniature and flexible pressure sensors is proposed to measure the grip pressure distribution (GPD) at the hand-handle interface of a vibrating handle. The GPD was acquired under static and dynamic loads for various levels of grip forces and magnitudes of vibration at different discrete frequencies in the 20–1000 Hz range. The EMG of finger flexor muscles was acquired using the silver-silver chloride surface electrodes under different static and dynamic loads. The measured data was analysed to study the influence of grip force, and magnitude and frequency characteristics of handle vibration on: (i) the local concentration of forces at the hand-handle interface; and (ii) the electrical activity of the finger flexor muscles. The results of the study revealed high interface pressure near the tips of index and middle fingers, and base of the thumb under static grip conditions. This concentration of high pressure shifted towards the middle of the fingers under dynamic loads, irrespective of the grip force, excitation frequency, and acceleration levels. The electrical activity of the finger flexor muscles increased considerably with the grip force under static as well as dynamic loads. The electrical activity under dynamic loads was observed to be 1·5–6·0 times higher than that under the static loads.     

The influence of seat backrest angle on perceived discomfort during exposure to vertical whole-body vibration

National and International Standards (e.g. BS 6841 and ISO 2631-1) provide methodologies for the measurement and assessment of whole-body vibration in terms of comfort and health. The EU Physical Agents (Vibration) Directive (PAVD) provides criteria by which vibration magnitudes can be assessed. However, these standards only consider upright seated (90°) and recumbent (0°) backrest angles, and do not provide guidance for semi-recumbent postures. This article reports an experimental programme that investigated the effects of backrest angle on comfort during vertical whole-body vibration. The series of experiments showed that a relationship exists between seat backrest angle, whole-body vibration frequency and perceived levels of discomfort. The recumbent position (0°) was the most uncomfortable and the semi-recumbent positions of 67.5° and 45° were the least uncomfortable. A new set of frequency weighting curves are proposed which use the same topology as the existing BS and ISO standards. These curves could be applied to those exposed to whole-body vibration in semi-recumbent postures to augment the existing standardised methods. PRACTITIONER SUMMARY: Current vibration standards provide guidance for assessing exposures for seated, standing and recumbent positions, but not for semi-recumbent postures. This article reports new experimental data systematically investigating the effect of backrest angle on discomfort experienced. It demonstrates that most discomfort is caused in a recumbent posture and that least was caused in a semi-recumbent posture.     

Modelling and simulation of locomotive driver''s seat vertical suspension vibration isolation system

The paper describes the simulation of a vertical seat suspension system with a variable damper. The model presented describes a real damper with bushings and is an extension of the classical linear SDOF oscillatory system. Transfer functions were identified from laboratory measurements and the mechano-mathematical model produced was validated by field measurements. The seat cushion parameters were identified from laboratory measurements and combined with standardized vertical (z-axis) seated human body models (ISO 5982 and DIN 45676). These models, together with an inert mass human body model, were used to predict the vibration mitigation performance of the seat–occupant system. The results were compared to data obtained from field measurements under real operating conditions. It was found that the use of the inert mass human body model resulted in the smallest differences between predicted and measured system vibration isolation performance for the field excitation in the frequency band up to 4.5 Hz, where most of the vibratory energy was present in the field. Hence this simplified model is suggested for prediction of vibration influence on locomotive driver under field conditions.

Relevance to the industry

The developed model using various seated human body models in the vertical direction revealed that an inert mass instead of the human body model may be sufficient for reliable prediction of seat vibration mitigation properties in rail vehicles. The developed model and findings reported here assisted in development of an improved locomotive driver's seat.     

The application of SEAT values for predicting how compliant seats with backrests influence vibration discomfort

The extent to which a seat can provide useful attenuation of vehicle vibration depends on three factors: the characteristics of the vehicle motion, the vibration transmissibility of the seat, and the sensitivity of the body to vibration. The ‘seat effective amplitude transmissibility’ (i.e., SEAT value) reflects how these three factors vary with the frequency and the direction of vibration so as to predict the vibration isolation efficiency of a seat. The SEAT value is mostly used to select seat cushions or seat suspensions based on the transmission of vertical vibration to the principal supporting surface of a seat. This study investigated the accuracy of SEAT values in predicting how seats with backrests influence the discomfort caused by multiple-input vibration. Twelve male subjects participated in a four-part experiment to determine equivalent comfort contours, the relative discomfort, the location of discomfort, and seat transmissibility with three foam seats and a rigid reference seat at 14 frequencies of vibration in the range 1–20 Hz at magnitudes of vibration from 0.2 to 1.6 ms⁻² r.m.s. The ‘measured seat dynamic discomfort’ (MSDD) was calculated for each foam seat from the ratio of the vibration acceleration required to cause similar discomfort with the foam seat and with the rigid reference seat. Using the frequency weightings in current standards, the SEAT values of each seat were calculated from the ratio of overall ride values with the foam seat to the overall ride values with the rigid reference seat, and compared to the corresponding MSDD at each frequency. The SEAT values provided good predictions of how the foam seats increased vibration discomfort at frequencies around the 4-Hz resonance but reduced vibration discomfort at frequencies greater than about 6.3 Hz, with discrepancies explained by a known limitation of the frequency weightings.     

Transmission of roll and pitch seat vibration to the head

A series of experiments has investigated the transmission of roll and pitch seat vibration to the heads of seated subjects. Head motion was measured in all six axes using a light-weight bite-bar while seated subjects were exposed to random motion at frequencies of up to 5 Hz at 1.0 rad.s ^?2 r.m.s. Subjects sat on a rigid flat seat in two body postures: ‘back-on’ (back in contact with backrest) and ‘back-off’ (no backrest contact). The influence of the position of the centre of rotation was also investigated.

Motion at the head occurred mostly in the lateral, roll and yaw axes during exposure to roll seat vibration and in the fore-and-aft, vertical and pitch axes during exposure to pitch seat vibration. A reduction in the magnitude of head motion occurred when the subjects sat in a 'back-off' posture compared with a 'back-on' posture. Varying the position of the centre of rotation along the lateral axis during roll seat vibration affected vertical and pitch head motion: least head motion occurred when the centre of rotation was in line with the subject's mid-sagittal plane. Varying the position of the centre of rotation along the vertical axis during roll seat vibration affected head motion in the mid-coronal plane: roll head motion decreased as the position of the centre of rotation was raised from below the seat surface to above the seat surface. Varying the centre of rotation (along the fore-and-aft and vertical axes) during pitch seat vibration altered head motion in the mid-sagittal plane. Head motion increased with increasing distance of the centre of rotation in front or behind the subject's ischial tuberosities and increased as the seat was raised from below the centre of rotation to above the centre of rotation.     

Equivalent comfort contours for vertical seat vibration: effect of vibration magnitude and backrest inclination

This study determined how backrest inclination and the frequency and magnitude of vertical seat vibration influence vibration discomfort. Subjects experienced vertical seat vibration at frequencies in the range 2.5-25 Hz at vibration magnitudes in the range 0.016-2.0 ms(-2) r.m.s. Equivalent comfort contours were determined with five backrest conditions: no backrest, and with a stationary backrest inclined at 0° (upright), 30°, 60° and 90°. Within all conditions, the frequency of greatest sensitivity to acceleration decreased with increasing vibration magnitude. Compared to an upright backrest, around the main resonance of the body, the vibration magnitudes required to cause similar discomfort were 100% greater with 60° and 90° backrest inclinations and 50% greater with a 30° backrest inclination. It is concluded that no single frequency weighting provides an accurate prediction of the discomfort caused by vertical seat vibration at all magnitudes and with all backrest conditions. PRACTITIONER SUMMARY: Vertical seat vibration is a main cause of vibration discomfort for drivers and passengers of road vehicles. A frequency weighting has been standardised for the evaluation of vertical seat vibration when sitting upright but it was not known whether this weighting is suitable for the reclined sitting postures often adopted during travel.     

Response of the seated human body to whole-body vertical vibration: biodynamic responses to sinusoidal and random vibration

The dependence of biodynamic responses of the seated human body on the frequency, magnitude and waveform of vertical vibration has been studied in 20 males and 20 females. With sinusoidal vibration (13 frequencies from 1 to 16 Hz) at five magnitudes (0.1–1.6 ms^? 2 r.m.s.) and with random vibration (1–16 Hz) at the same magnitudes, the apparent mass of the body was similar with random and sinusoidal vibration of the same overall magnitude. With increasing magnitude of vibration, the stiffness and damping of a model fitted to the apparent mass reduced and the resonance frequency decreased (from 6.5 to 4.5 Hz). Male and female subjects had similar apparent mass (after adjusting for subject weight) and a similar principal resonance frequency with both random and sinusoidal vibration. The change in biodynamic response with increasing vibration magnitude depends on the frequency of the vibration excitation, but is similar with sinusoidal and random excitation.     

Qualitative models of seat discomfort including static and dynamic factors

Judgements of overall seating comfort in dynamic conditions sometimes correlate better with the static characteristics of a seat than with measures of the dynamic environment. This study developed qualitative models of overall seat discomfort to include both static and dynamic seat characteristics. A dynamic factor that reflected how vibration discomfort increased as vibration magnitude increased was combined with a static seat factor which reflected seating comfort without vibration. The ability of the model to predict the relative and overall importance of dynamic and static seat characteristics on comfort was tested in two experiments. A paired comparison experiment, using four polyurethane foam cushions (50, 70, 100, 120 mm thick), provided different static and dynamic comfort when 12 subjects were exposed to one-third octave band random vertical vibration with centre frequencies of 2.5 and 5.5 Hz, at magnitudes of 0.00, 0.25 and 0.50 m.s^-2 rms measured beneath the foam samples. Subject judgements of the relative discomfort of the different conditions depended on both static and dynamic characteristics in a manner consistent with the model. The effect of static and dynamic seat factors on overall seat discomfort was investigated by magnitude estimation using three foam cushions (of different hardness) and a rigid wooden seat at six vibration magnitudes with 20 subjects. Static seat factors (i.e. cushion stiffness) affected the manner in which vibration influenced the overall discomfort: cushions with lower stiffness were more comfortable and more sensitive to changes in vibration magnitude than those with higher stiffness. The experiments confirm that judgements of overall seat discomfort can be affected by both the static and dynamic characteristics of a seat, with the effect depending on vibration magnitude: when vibration magnitude was low, discomfort was dominated by static seat factors; as the vibration magnitude increased, discomfort became dominated by dynamic factors.     

(Abstracts)Changing Industrial Demands

Abstract

The frequency dependence of discomfort caused by vertical mechanical shocks has been investigated with 20 seated males exposed to upward and downward shocks at 13 fundamental frequencies (1–16 Hz) and 18 magnitudes (±0.12 to ±8.3 ms^?2). The rate of growth of discomfort with increasing shock magnitude depended on the fundamental frequency of the shocks, so the frequency dependence of equivalent comfort contours (for both vertical acceleration and vertical force measured at the seat) varied with shock magnitude. The rate of growth of discomfort was similar for acceleration and force, upward and downward shocks, and lower and higher magnitude shocks. The frequency dependence of discomfort from shocks differs from that of sinusoidal vibrations having the same fundamental frequencies. This arises in part from the frequency content of the shock. Frequency weighting W_b in BS 6841:1987 and ISO 2631-1:1997 provided reasonable estimates of the discomfort caused by the shocks investigated in this study.

Practitioner Summary: No single frequency weighting can accurately predict the discomfort caused by mechanical shocks over wide ranges of shock magnitude, but vibration dose values with frequency weighting W_b provide reasonable estimates of discomfort caused by shocks similar to those investigated in this study with peak accelerations well below 1 g.