Effect of a styrene–butadiene copolymer on the phase structure and impact strength of polyethylene/high‐impact polystyrene blends

The effect of a styrene–butadiene block copolymer on the phase structure and impact strength of high‐density and low‐density polyethylene/high‐impact polystyrene blends with various compositions was studied. For both the blends, the type of the phase structure was not affected by addition of a styrene–butadiene compatibilizer. The localization and structure of the compatibilizer in the blends were dependent on their composition. Addition of the compatibilizer improved impact strength of the blends in the whole concentration range. The improvement was the largest for blends with a low amount of the minor phase. © 2001 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 81: 570–580, 2001     

Morphology evolution of immiscible LDPE/PVC blends in the presence of compatibilizer and phase dispersant

Phase dispersion and coalescence in low‐density polyethylene (LDPE)/polyvinyl chloride (PVC) (70/30) blends influenced by compatibilizer and phase dispersant was studied. It was found that the morphology evolution of blends is sensitive to not only processing conditions (shear strength and mixing time) but also the added compatibilizer or phase dispersant. In our conditions, the stable phase morphology of each blend is obtained after mixing 15–25 min. In addition, the dispersed PVC phase in blends is easy to aggregate when the mixing rotor speed changed from high to low for the binary blends. As a compatibilizer, chlorided polyethylene (CPE) or nitrile rubber (NBR) can stabilize the morphology and hinder the coalescence of the dispersed PVC phase when added to the blends. However, the phase dispersant butadiene rubber (BR) or styrene butadiene rubber (SBR) could not stabilize the phase structure, although it could accelerate phase dispersion. © 2003 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 91: 763–772, 2004     

Injection and compression molding of polystyrene/high-density polyethylene blends—phase morphology and tensile behavior

Processing and compatibilization effects on the phase morphology and the tensile behavior of blends of polystyrene and high-density polyethylene (PS/HDPE) were investigated. As predicted by theory, high shear rates encountered during extrusion blending led to efficient minor phase emulsification in immiscible PS/HDPE blends for which the viscosity ratio approaches unity. Consequently, the emulsifying effect of a styrene/ethylene-butylene/styrene (SEBS) compatibilizer was found to be negligible. In the subsequent molding process, disintegration, shape relaxation and coarsening of the minor phase domains were found to be responsible for the morphological evolution. In the compression molding process, morphological observations showed that the rate of minor phase coarsening followed the predictions of the Ostwald ripening theory, in agreement with the rheological analysis. In the injection molding process, minor phase coarsening was attributed to shear coalescence. Tensile tests performed on compression molded and injection molded blends showed that the mechanical behavior of PS/HDPE blends depend strongly upon the matrix orientation as well as the dispersed phase morphology and orientation. In both postforming operations, compatibilization effects on the morphological stability and the tensile behavior of PS/HDPE blends were found to be dependent upon the composition and the rheological behavior of the blend. Evidence of adhesion between the PS and HDPE phases was observed in the presence of SEBS in HDPE-rich blends.     

Functionalizing polymer surfaces by field‐induced migration of copolymer additives—role of shear fields

Flow‐induced migration polyethylene‐co‐methacrylic acid (PE‐co‐MA) and polystyrene‐b‐polydimethylsiloxane (PS‐b‐PD MS) copolymer additives in commercial long‐chain branch polyethylene (PE) and narrow‐molecular distribution polystyrene (PS) hosts was investigated in a capillary flow device. Attenuated Total Reflection Fourier Transform Infrared (ATR‐FTIR) spectroscopy and Dynamic Contact Angle (DCA) measurements were used to characterize surface composition of polymer specimen following extrusion through metallic dies with various length‐to‐diameter (L/D) ratios, (1100 ? L/D ? 3000). Results from experiments covering a broad range of shear rates and polymer residence times in the dies are reported. Provided that the polymer residence time in the die is sufficiently long, shear is found to increase the concentrations of low molecular weight copolymer additives on the host polymer's surface. The surface composition of copolymer additive is found to vary strongly with the wall shear rate and die L/D ratio. Decreasing the die diameter at fixed flow rate is found, for example, to be a more effective method for enhancing transport of additive to a polymer's surface than increasing shear rate at fixed diameter. A mechanism based on shear‐induced diffusion is proposed to explain the observed migration.     

Morphological stability of postconsumer PET/HDPE blends

Summary The morphological stability and the mechanical properties of postconsumer polyethylene terephthalate (PET) and high density polyethylene (HDPE), at different composition with and without compatibilizer were investigated. The blends were prepared in an internal mixer and in a twin screw-extruder at different stretching ratio. For uncompatibilized blends, (previously prepared by extrusion), the particle size of the dispersed phase increases after being reprocessed in an internal mixer. However, in the case of compatibilized blend the particle size remains constant. Consequently, the compatibilizer reduces interfacial mobility, coalescence effects and stabilizes the morphology. The mechanical properties are also modified by the presence of the compatibilizer, mainly the elongation at break. Received: 14 January 2000/Accepted: 16 August 2000     

Mechanical behavior of injection-molded polystyrene/polyethylene blends: Fracture toughness vs. fatigue crack propagation

Blends of polystyrene and polyethylene (PS/PE), including belnds in which a styrene/ethylene-butylene/styrene (SEBS) terpolymer was employed as a compatibilizer, were studied. Their rheology showed that the effect of the addition of SEBS to PS/PE blends was strongly affected by the blend composition and the shear rates involved in the blending and post-forming processes. The addition of PE to PS led to a reduction of fracture toughness compared with that of PS. This effect was attributed to the fine minor phase morphology of the blends obtained after extrusion blending and injection molding. The fatigue crack propagation (FCP) results showed that the fatigue crack growth rates were significantly reduced at low and moderate range of stress intensity factor (ΔK) by the presence of PE. Performance was enhanced when SEBS was present. The results also showed that both the fracture toughness and the FCP behavior of the blends were strongly dependent on the loading direction, the minor phase morphology, the composition of the blend, and, to a lesser degree, the presence of a compatibilizer. This study demonstrates that the fracture toughness and the FCP performance of such polymer blends can vary inversely.     

Melt blending of linear low-density polyethylene and polystyrene in a Haake internal mixer. II. Morphology-processing relationships

A measure of the effective shear rate range for dispersive mixing in the Haake mixer has been developed, which is more representative of shearing conditions than that currently used. In addition, the effects of processing conditions, composition, and compatibilizer on linear low-density polyethylene and polystyrene (LLDPE/PS) blend morphology were studied. Fiber/stratified morphologies form with blends when the minor phase has low viscosity and is present at its higher concentration. The influence of the viscosity ratio on phase size was found to be a minor effect for mixtures having a low fraction of the dispersed phase (20% PS). The effect of shear intensity, however, was found to be more important at a low composition of the dispersed phase or in compatibilized blends. During Haake blending, an optimal time for adding compatibilizer to stabilize phase morphology was found to be when the final morphology of an incompatible blend had developed. Further studies have concluded that the addition of styrene–ethylene/butylene–styrene (SEBS) stabilized the blend morphology of LLDPE/PS more efficiently than styrene–ethylene/propylene (SEP) on different blending conditions and compositions. At high temperatures, the addition of SEP to a LLDPE/PS blend did not modify the dispersed phase size. On the other hand, SEBS stabilized the dispersion so that the final domain size is independent of composition. © 1995 John Wiley & Sons, Inc.     

Compatibilization of PE/PS and PE/PP blends. I. Effect of processing conditions and formulation

The objective of this work was to study the effectiveness of low‐cost commercial compatibilizers and several processes (internal mixer, single‐ and twin‐screw extruders) for two types of plastic blends: high‐density polyethylene/polypropylene and high‐density polyethylene/polystyrene blends, to gain insight into the recycling of wastes from those frequently encountered mixed plastics. Blends going from a pure A to a pure B component, with and without a compatibilizer, were prepared using an internal mixer, a corotating twin‐screw extruder, as well as a single‐screw extruder to follow an industrial‐convenient process. In both cases, the analyses of blend morphologies highlighted the poor adherence between the two phases in the uncompatibilized blends. Compatibilized blends display better adherence between phases and the ability to process blends made from both single‐ and twin‐screw extruders. When adding a compatibilizer, the viscosity of each blend (PE/PP or PE/PS) increased due to a better adhesion of the phases. Charpy impact tests showed that the presence of the compatibilizer in PE/PS blends increased their impact properties. Indeed, the improvement of the adhesion between the two phases enabled stress transfer at the interface. A single‐screw extruder seems to be efficient as a processing method on an industrial scale when a compatibilizer is used. © 2003 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 90: 2475–2484, 2003     

MWNT‐filled PC/ABS blends: Correlation of morphology with rheological and electrical response

A systematic study was done on morphological, electrical and rheological behavior of co‐continuous or dispersed‐type polycarbonate (PC)/acrylonitrile‐styrene‐butadiene (ABS) blends, containing different amounts of multiwalled carbon nanotubes (MWNT). The MWNTs gave substantial electrical conductivities to these nanocomposites at very low concentrations, owing to the effective melt processing method. Because of selective localization of MWNTs in the PC phase, along with double percolation phenomenon, the blend with co‐continuous morphology showed a lower electrical and rheological percolation threshold, higher melt viscosity and elasticity, as compared to the system with dispersed morphology. The morphology of both the blend systems was refined as a result of MWNTs incorporation but the morphology type remained unchanged. A typical role of compatibilizer in refining blend morphology was observed in both the systems. The electrical conductivity of the system filled with MWNTs in presence of compatibilizer, was lower than the systems filled with MWNTs only, which was attributed to role of compatibilizer in directing a part of MWNTs from PC matrix toward ABS phase. With increasing compatibilizer/MWNTs ratio, the influence of compatibilizer on morphology refinement and conductivity reduction was intensified. By comparing TEM micrograph of PC/SAN/MWNTs with that of PC/ABS/MWNTs, it was revealed that small portion of MWNTs was also located on polybutadiene rubber fraction of ABS. © 2013 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 130: 739‐748, 2013     

Mechanical behaviors of ethylene/styrene interpolymer compatibilized polystyrene/polyethylene blends

In this study, ethylene/styrene interpolymer was used as a compatibilizer for the blends of polystyrene (PS) and high‐density polyethylene (HDPE). The mechanical properties including tensile and impact properties and morphology of the blends were investigated by means of uniaxial tension, instrumented falling‐weight impact measurements, and scanning electron microscopy. Tensile tests showed that the yield strength of the PS/HDPE/ESI blends decreases considerably with increasing HDPE content. However, the elongation at break of the blends tended to increase significantly with increasing HDPE content. The excellent tensile ductility of the HDPE‐rich blends resulted from shield yielding of the matrix. Izod and Charpy impact measurements indicated that the impact strength of the blends increases slowly with HDPE content up to 40 wt %; thereafter, it increases sharply with increasing HDPE content. The impact energy of the HDPE‐rich blends exceeded that of pure HDPE, implying that the HDPE polymer can be further toughened by the incorporation of brittle PS minor phase in the presence of ESI compatibilizer. The correlation between the impact property and morphology of the blends is discussed. © 2007 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 104: 4001–4007, 2007     

The effect of zinc oxide addition on the compatibilization efficiency of maleic anhydride grafted high‐density polyethylene compatibilizer for high‐density polyethylene/polyamide 6 blends

A high‐density polyethylene with grafted maleic anhydride units has been investigated as a compatibilizer for high‐density polyethylene with polyamide 6. The material acts as an effective compatibilizer, causing a marked reduction in dispersed phase size as well as an increase in tensile strength and toughness. Compatibilizer also affects the glass‐transition temperature, crystallization kinetics, and amount of crystalline material for certain blend compositions. The addition of zinc cations, which are effective in increasing ethylene‐acid copolymer compatibilizer performance in low‐density polyethylene/polyamide blends, has little, if any, effect on compatibilizer performance in these high‐density polyethylene/polyamide blends. © 2006 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 103: 3871–3881, 2007     

影响HDPE/PS/PMMA三元体系核壳形态的因素

通过密炼得到高密度聚乙烯(HDPE)、聚苯乙烯(PS)和聚甲基丙烯酸甲酯(PMMA)三元体系核壳结构。用扫描电镜(SEM)考察了组分配比、增容剂氢化苯乙烯-丁二烯-苯乙烯弹性体(SEBS)和退火对体系核壳形态的影响。结果表明,组分用量最大的HDPE总是形成基体相,而PS形成壳,PMMA形成核;核壳粒子的尺寸和内部结构随组分用量而变化,随着分散相用量(PS+PMMA)增加,核壳粒子间碰撞融合机会增多,因此核壳粒子尺寸变大,同时核壳粒子由一核一壳逐渐转变为多核一壳结构;而随着核壳粒子中PS用量增加,PMMA核的尺寸显著减小;增容剂SEBS的加入,抑制了共混中核壳粒子间的融合,导致核和壳的尺寸减小;200℃下退火处理使分散相向体系自由能更小的一核一壳结构转变。     

Properties of the polyethylene/poly (2,6-dimethyl-1,4-phenylene ether)/polystyrene system in the presence of SEPS block copolymers

An immiscible polymer system of polyethylene (HDPE)/poly(2,6-dimethyl-1,4-phenylene ether)/polystyrene was compatibilized in the presence of a specific formulated compatibilizer and the properties of this system were studied, in particular, as a function of the poly(phenylene ether) and polystyrene content in the blend with polyethylene and as a function of compatibilizer concentration. The compatibilizer used was a hydrogenated styrene/isoprene/styrene triblock copolymer (SEPS) which also contained quantities of polypropylene and paraffin oil. Selected thermal, mechanical, and processing properties were investigated and their special features are discussed. In relation to specific properties like the modulus of elasticity and notched Izod impact strength, the polymer system with a hydrogenated SEPS triblock copolymer investigated seems to be a better compatibilized system than other blends described. The phase behavior of the polymer system was characterized using DSC and showed three general polymer phases: a partially crystalline polyethylene phase, an amorphous mixed phase of miscible poly(phenylene ether) and polystyrene, as well as a preferred isotactic crystalline polypropylene phase. © 1997 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 64: 1835–1842, 1997     

Effect of a N,N′‐disubstituted phenylenediamine stabilizer and SB/EPDM compatibilizer on toughness and morphology of blends of pre‐aged polyethylene with high‐impact polystyrene

The effect of a N,N′‐disubstituted 1,4‐phenylenediamine stabilizer and styrene‐butadiene block copolymer (SB)/ethylene‐propylene elastomer (EPDM) compatibilizer on mechanical properties and phase structure of pre‐aged low‐density polyethylene (LDPE; a model of aged recyclate)/high‐impact polystyrene (HIPS) blends was studied. A strong cooperative effect between the stabilizer and compatibilizer on the impact strength and fineness of the phase structure of LDPE/HIPS blends was found. Analysis of chemical reactions assumed to proceed in the system during processing led to the conclusion that improvement in the impact strength and phase structure was accounted for by reactive formation of a LDPE‐SB graft copolymer in a process supported by the presence of the bifunctional amine‐based stabilizer. The mixture of the amine stabilizer with SB/EPDM is a very promising upgrading system for post‐consumer plastic waste containing pre‐oxidized LDPE. J. VINYL. ADDIT. TECHNOL. 12:58–65, 2006. © 2006 Society of Plastics Engineers.     

Stress‐relaxation behavior of natural rubber/polystyrene and natural rubber/polystyrene/natural rubber‐graft‐polystyrene blends

We studied the stress‐relaxation behavior of natural rubber (NR)/polystyrene (PS) blends in tension. The effects of strain level, composition, compatibilizer loading, and aging on the stress‐relaxation behavior were investigated in detail. The dispersed/matrix phase morphology always showed a two‐stage mechanism. On the other hand, the cocontinuos morphology showed a single‐stage mechanism. The addition of a compatibilizer (NR‐g‐PS) into 50/50 blends changed the blend morphology to a matrix/dispersed phase structure. As a result, a two‐step relaxation mechanism was found in the compatibilized blends. A three‐stage mechanism was observed at very high loadings of the compatibilizer (above the critical micelle concentration), where the compatibilizer formed micelles in the continuous phase. The aged samples showed a two‐stage relaxation mechanism. The rate of relaxation increased with strain levels. The aging produced interesting effects on the relaxation pattern. The rate of relaxation increased with temperature due to the degradation of the samples. © 2008 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci, 2008     

Use of postconsumer polyethylene in blends with polyamide 6: Effects of the extrusion method and the compatibilizer

Blends of polyamide and high‐density polyethylene show adequate properties for a large range of applications: they are used for the production of filaments, containers, and molding resins. The effect of the addition of 2 wt % of a compatibilizer, maleic anhydride grafted polyethylene, to the blend was studied and compared to the use of postconsumer polyethylene. The samples were extruded with single‐ and twin‐screw extruders with 25, 50, or 75 wt % f polyethylene, and the test specimens, molded by injection, were characterized by stress–strain tests, thermal properties, and morphologies. Processing the blends with postconsumer polyethylene in both extruders improved the mechanical properties in comparison to the blends processed with high‐density polyethylene and the compatibilizer. The morphologies of these blends showed that there was a decrease in the domain size of the disperse phase with the use of the compatibilizer or postconsumer polyethylene. The results indicate that for this blend, postconsumer polyethylene substituted, with advantages, for the necessity of a compatibilizer and the use of the high‐density polyethylene. © 2008 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci, 2008.     

Binary and ternary blends of recycled high‐density polyethylene containing polypropylenes

Binary and ternary blends of the high viscosity recycled high‐density polyethylene (reHDPE) from milk bottles, containing either homopolymer polypropylene (PP) or copolymer polypropylene (coPP), were developed in an effort to reduce viscosity and encourage ease of processing by injection molding, without a significant loss in mechanical properties. A grade of PP and a grade of coPP that had crystallization temperatures close to and slightly lower than that of reHDPE were chosen for blending in order to obtain simultaneous crystallization of the reHDPE and (co)PP phases. The resulting reHDPE/(co)PP blends (reHDPE wt% = 77) generally showed very good mechanical properties and, in particular, sufficiently high impact strength while engendering considerably lower viscosity than reHDPE. The PP was more useful at very high and low shear rates whereas the coPP was the most efficient in the mid‐range of shear rates (10² – 10³ sec^?1). Good impact resistance shown by the reHDPE/(co)PP blends was attributed in part to the fine dispersion of (co)PP phase, possible involvement of a portion of the polymers in a co‐continuous structure and simultaneous crystallization of the components. Ternary blends of reHDPE (reHDPE wt% = 77), PP and low‐density polyethylene (LDPE) showed good mechanical performance, although they were more viscous than (co)PP blends. In the ternary blends, co‐crystallization of reHDPE and LDPE phases was preserved (1).     

Use of zinc‐neutralized ethylene/methacrylic acid copolymer ionomers as blend compatibilizers for nylon 6 and low‐density polyethylene

The effect of the composition on the morphologies and properties of uncompatibilized and compatibilized blends of nylon 6 and low‐density polyethylene were studied over a wide range of weight fractions. The uncompatibilized blends had substantially reduced mechanical properties after mixing, and this was almost certainly due to poor interfacial adhesion between the two polymers. The addition of a zinc‐neutralized poly(ethylene‐co‐methacrylic acid) ionomer (Surlyn® 9020) as a compatibilizer improved the mechanical properties in comparison with those of the material blended without the compatibilizer. The clearest evidence of this improvement came from dynamic mechanical studies; for selected blends with high polyethylene contents, the drop in the modulus corresponding to the transition of a solid to a melt occurred at higher temperatures with the added compatibilizer. This improvement in the properties was accompanied by a reduction in the dispersed‐phase size due to the interaction between the ionic part of the ionomer and the amide groups of nylon 6, especially when nylon 6 was the dispersed phase of the blend. © 2003 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 89: 620–629, 2003     

Compatibilizing agents in polymer blends: Interfacial tension,phase morphology,and mechanical properties

The interfacial tension, phase morphology, and phase growth was determined for four polymer blend systems: polyethylene/polystyrene, polyethylene/polyamide-6, polystyrene/polyamide-6, and polystyrene/poly(ethylene terephthalate). Generally, high interfacial tension correlates with coarse phase morphology and rapid phase coalescence. The addition of various potential compatibilizing agents to these binary blend systems results in lowered interfacial tension, finer and stabilized phase morphologies. The characteristics of different compatibilizing agents were compared for several of the blend systems. We also look at the influences of compatibilizing agents on mechanical properties of the blend systems. Some compatibilizing agents are able to produce substantial improvements in ultimate properties.     

Poly(ethylene‐graft‐ethylene oxide) (PE‐PEO) and poly(ethylene‐co‐acrylic acid) (PEAA) as compatibilizers in blends of LDPE and polyamide‐6

In a blend of two immiscible polymers a controlled morphology can be obtained by adding a block or graft copolymer as compatibilizer. In the present work blends of low‐density polyethylene (PE) and polyamide‐6 (PA‐6) were prepared by melt mixing the polymers in a co‐rotating, intermeshing twin‐screw extruder. Poly(ethylene‐graft‐polyethylene oxide) (PE‐PEO), synthesized from poly(ethylene‐co‐acrylic acid) (PEAA) (backbone) and poly(ethylene oxide) monomethyl ether (MPEO) (grafts), was added as compatibilizer. As a comparison, the unmodified backbone polymer, PEAA, was used. The morphology of the blends was studied by scanning electron microscopy (SEM). Melting and crystallization behavior of the blends was investigated by differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) and mechanical properties by tensile testing. The compatibilizing mechanisms were different for the two copolymers, and generated two different blend morphologies. Addition of PE‐PEO gave a material with small, well‐dispersed PA‐spheres having good adhesion to the PE matrix, whereas PEAA generated a morphology characterized by small PA‐spheres agglomerated to larger structures. Both compatibilized PE/PA blends had much improved mechanical properties compared with the uncompatibilized blend, with elongation at break (ε_b) increasing up to 200%. Addition of compatibilizer to the PE/PA blends stabilized the morphology towards coalescence and significantly reduced the size of the dispersed phase domains, from an average diameter of 20 μm in the unmodified PE/PA blend to approximately 1 μm in the compatibilized blends. © 2000 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 78: 2416–2424, 2000