Effects of tetramethylpolycarbonate‐block‐poly(styrene‐co‐acrylonitrile) copolymers containing various amounts of acrylonitrile on the interfacial properties of polycarbonate and poly(styrene‐co‐acrylonitrile) blends

Tetramethylpolycarbonate‐block‐poly(styrene‐co‐acrylonitrile) (TMPC‐block‐SAN) block copolymers containing various amounts of acrylonitrile (AN) were examined as compatibilizers for blends of polycarbonate (PC) with poly(styrene‐co‐acrylonitrile) (SAN) copolymers. To explore the effects of block copolymers on the compatibility of PC/SAN blends, the average diameter of the dispersed particles in the blend was measured with an image analyzer, and the interfacial properties of the blends were analyzed with an imbedded fibre retraction technique and an asymmetric double‐cantilever beam fracture test. Reduction in the average diameter of dispersed particles and effective improvement in the interfacial properties was observed by adding TMPC‐block‐SAN copolymers as compatibilizer of PC/SAN blend. TMPC‐block‐SAN copolymer was effective as a compatibilizer when the difference in the AN content of SAN copolymer and that of SAN block in TMPC‐block‐SAN copolymer was less than about 10 wt%. Copyright © 2004 Society of Chemical Industry     

Compatibilization of Polymer Blends from Poly(butadiene‐g‐poly(styrene‐co‐acrylonitrile)) and Polycarbonate through Oxazoline‐ and Benzoxazole‐Modification of ABS

Blends of poly(butadiene‐g‐poly(styrene‐co‐acrylonitrile) (ABS) with polycarbonate (PC) are some of the most successful multiphase materials, with applications in the automotive and electronics industries. The mechanical properties of the complete incompatible blends are mainly determined by the interaction between the poly(styrene‐co‐acrylonitrile) (S/AN) component of the ABS and the PC as well as through the dispersion of the elastomeric component poly(butadiene) in the thermoplastic S/AN‐matrix. The aim of our work is to optimize the modification process by the use of new substituted amino alcohols and amino phenols, as well as the use of a more efficient catalyst. Both reactive and non reactive compatibilization of polymer blends should be performed with the new ABS‐modifications.     

Blending poly(methyl methacrylate) and poly(styrene‐co‐acrylonitrile) as composite polymer electrolyte

A blend of poly(methyl methacrylate) (PMMA) and poly(styrene‐co‐acrylonitrile) (PSAN) has been evaluated as a composite polymer electrolyte by means of differential scanning calorimetry (DSC), Fourier transform infrared (FTIR) spectroscopy, ac impedance measurements, and linear sweep voltammetry (LSV). The blends show an interaction with the Li⁺ ions when complexed with lithium perchlorate (LiClO₄), which results in an increase in the glass‐transition temperature (T_g) of the blends. The purpose of using PSAN as another component of the blend is to improve the poor mechanical properties of PMMA‐based plasticized electrolytes. The mechanical property is further improved by introducing fumed silica as inert filler, and hence the liquid electrolyte uptake and ionic conductivity of the composite systems are increased. Room‐temperature conductivity of the order of 10^?4 S/cm has been achieved for one of the composite electrolytes made from a 1/1 blend of PSAN and PMMA containing 120% liquid electrolyte [1M LiClO₄/propylene carbonate (PC)] and 10% fumed silica. These systems also showed good compatibility with Li electrodes and sufficient electrochemical stability for safe operation in Li batteries. © 2001 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 80: 1319–1328, 2001     

Miscibility windows in ternary polymer blends of a polyester,polymethacrylate and poly(styrene‐co‐acrylonitrile)

Miscibility, phase diagrams and morphology of poly(ε‐caprolactone) (PCL)/poly(benzyl methacrylate) (PBzMA)/poly(styrene‐co‐acrylonitrile) (SAN) ternary blends were investigated by differential scanning calorimetry (DSC), optical microscopy (OM), and scanning electron microscopy (SEM). The miscibility window of PCL/PBzMA/SAN ternary blends is influenced by the acrylonitrile (AN) content in the SAN copolymers. At ambient temperature, the ternary polymer blend is completely miscible within a closed‐loop miscibility window. DSC showed only one glass transition temperature (T_g) for PCL/PBzMA/SAN‐17 and PCL/PBzMA/SAN‐25 ternary blends; furthermore, OM and SEM results showed that PCL/PBzMA/SAN‐17 and PCL/PBzMA/SAN‐25 were homogeneous for any composition of the ternary phase diagram. Hence, it demonstrated that miscibility exists for PCL/PBzMA/SAN‐17 and PCL/PBzMA/SAN‐25 ternary blends, but that the ternary system becomes phase‐separated outside these AN contents. Copyright © 2003 Society of Chemical Industry     

Viscoelastic properties of blends of poly(methyl methacrylate) and poly(styrene‐co‐acrylonitrile) having various acrylonitrile contents

Dynamic viscoelastic properties of blends of poly(methyl methacrylate) (PMMA) and poly(styrene‐co‐acrylonitrile) (SAN) with various AN contents were measured to evaluate the influence of SAN composition, consequently χ parameter, upon the melt rheology. PMMA/SAN blends were miscible and exhibited a terminal flow region characterized by Newtonian flow, when the acrylonitrile (AN) content of SAN ranges from 10 to 27 wt %. Whereas, PMMA/SAN blends were immiscible and exhibited a long time relaxation, when the AN content in SAN is less than several wt % or greater than 30 wt %. Correspondingly, melt rheology of the blends was characterized by the plots of storage modulus G′ against loss modulus G″. Log G′ versus log G″ plots exhibited a straight line of slope 2 for the miscible blends, but did not show a straight line for the immiscible blends because of their long time relaxation mechanism. The plateau modulus, determined as the storage modulus G′ in the plateau zone at the frequency where tan δ is at maximum, varied linearly with the AN content of SAN irrespective of blend miscibility. This result indicates that the additivity rule holds well for the entanglement molecular weights in miscible PMMA/SAN blends. However, the entanglement molecular weights in immiscible blends should have “apparent” values, because the above method to determine the plateau modulus is not applicable for the immiscible blends. Effect of χ parameter on the plateau modulus of the miscible blends could not be found. © 2008 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci, 2008     

The role of polycarbonate molecular weight in the poly(L‐lactide) blends compatibilized with poly(butylene succinate‐co‐L‐lactate)

Poly(butylene succinate‐co‐L ‐lactate) (PBSL)–compatibilized poly(L ‐lactide) (PLLA) polymer blends with two commercial grades of polycarbonate (PC) were investigated. The capillary tests showed that the steady shear viscosity of high molecular weight PC (PC‐L) was 10 times higher than that of low molecular weight PC (PC‐AD) throughout the shear rate range under investigation. Morphologic examination revealed that the shape of the dispersed PC‐L phase in the as‐extruded blends was largely spherical, but the PC‐AD phase was more like a rod and elongated further during injection molding. Notched Izod impact strength (IS) of the unmodified PLLA/PC‐L blend was higher than that of PC‐AD blend. The IS of modified ternary blends increased with PBSL content because of enhanced phase interaction indicated from thermal and morphologic analysis. The PBSL modification also enhanced IS more significantly in PLLA/PC‐L than in PLLA/PC‐AD blends. On the contrary, the heat deflection temperature (HDT) of PLLA/PC‐L binary system was much lower than that of PLLA/PC‐AD. HDT of PBSL‐modified PLLA/PC‐AD blends dropped with increasing PBSL content, which is a ductile polymer. Thermal and dynamic mechanical analysis of the ternary blends showed that individual components were immiscible with distinct T_gs for PC and PLLA and distinct T_ms for PBSL and PLLA. POLYM. ENG. SCI., 2013. © 2012 Society of Plastics Engineers     

Investigation on the miscibility of the blends of poly(methyl methacrylate) and poly(styrene‐co‐acrylonitrile)

The miscibility was investigated in blends of poly(methyl methacrylate) (PMMA) and styrene‐acrylonitrile (SAN) copolymers with different acrylonitrile (AN) contents. The 50/50 wt % blends of PMMA with the SAN copolymers containing 5, 35, and 50 wt % of AN were immiscible, while the blend with copolymer containing 25 wt % of AN was miscible. The morphologies of PMMA/SAN blends were characterized by virtue of scanning electron microscopy and transmission electron microscopy. It was found that the miscibility of PMMA/SAN blends were in consistence with the morphologies observed. Moreover, the different morphologies in blends of PMMA and SAN were also observed. © 2011 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci, 2011     

Phase morphology and thermomechanical analysis of poly(styrene‐co‐acrylonitrile)/ethylene–propylene–diene monomer blends: Uncompatibilized and reactively compatibilized blends with two mixing sequences

The phase morphology developing in immiscible poly(styrene‐co‐acrylonitrile) (SAN)/ethylene–propylene–diene monomer (EPDM) blends was studied with an in situ reactively generated SAN‐g‐EPDM compatibilizer through the introduction of a suitably chosen polymer additive (maleic anhydride) and 2,5‐dimethyl‐2,5‐di‐(t‐butyl peroxy) hexane (Luperox) and dicumyl peroxide as initiators during melt blending. Special attention was paid to the experimental conditions required for changing the droplet morphology for the dispersed phase. Two different mixing sequences (simple and two‐step) were used. The product of two‐step blending was a major phase surrounded by rubber particles; these rubber particles contained the occluded matrix phase. Depending on the mixing sequence, this particular phase morphology could be forced or could occur spontaneously. The composition was stabilized by the formation of the SAN‐g‐EPDM copolymer between the elastomer and addition polymer, which was characterized with Fourier transform infrared. As for the two initiators, the blends with Luperox showed better mechanical properties. Scanning electron microscopy studies revealed good compatibility for the SAN/EPDM blends produced by two‐step blending with this initiator. Dynamic mechanical thermal analysis studies showed that the two‐step‐prepared blend with Luperox had the best compatibility. © 2010 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci, 2011     

Thermal properties of blends of poly(hydroxybutyrate‐co‐hydroxyvalerate) and poly(styrene‐co‐acrylonitrile)

Thermal properties of blends of poly(hydroxybutyrate‐co‐hydroxyvalerate) (PHBV) and poly(styrene‐co‐acrylonitrile) (SAN) prepared by solution casting were investigated by differential scanning calorimetry. In the study of PHBV‐SAN blends by differential scanning calorimetry, glass transition temperature and melting point of PHBV in the PHBV‐SAN blends were almost unchanged compared with those of the pure PHBV. This result indicates that the blends of PHBV and SAN are immiscible. However, crystallization temperature of the PHBV in the blends decreased approximately 9–15°. From the results of the Avrami analysis of PHBV in the PHBV‐SAN blends, crystallization rate constant of PHBV in the PHBV‐SAN blends decreased compared with that of the pure PHBV. From the above results, it is suggested that the nucleation of PHBV in the blends is suppressed by the addition of SAN. From the measured crystallization half time and degree of supercooling, interfacial free energy for the formation of heterogeneous nuclei of PHBV in the PHBV‐SAN blends was calculated and found to be 2360 (mN/m)³ for the pure PHBV and 2920–3120 (mN/m)³ for the blends. The values of interfacial free energy indicate that heterogeneity of PHBV in the PHBV‐SAN blends is deactivated by the SAN. This result is consistent with the results of crystallization temperature and crystallization rate constant of PHBV in the PHBV‐SAN blends. © 2000 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 77: 673–679, 2000     

Kinetics of phase separation of poly(styrene‐co‐methyl methacrylate) and poly(styrene‐co‐acrylonitrile) blends

The phase behavior and kinetics of phase separation for blends of the random copolymer poly(styrene‐co‐methyl methacrylate) (SMMA) and poly(styrene‐co‐acrylonitrile) (SAN) were studied by using small‐angle laser light scattering. The partially miscible SMMA/SAN blends undergo spinodal decomposition (SD) and subsequent domain coarsening when quenched inside the unstable region. For blends of SMMA and SAN, the early stages of the phase separation process could be observed, unlike a number of other blends where the earliest stages are not visible by light scattering. The process was described in terms of the Cahn–Hilliard linear theory. Subsequently, a coarsening process was detected and the time evolution of q_m at the beginning of the late stages of phase separation followed the relationship q_m∝t^?1/3, corresponding to an evaporation–condensation mechanism. Self‐similar growth of the phase‐separated structures at different timescales was observed for the late stage. Copyright © 2004 Society of Chemical Industry     

Compatibility and thermal properties of poly(acrylonitrile–butadiene–styrene) copolymer blends with poly(methyl methacrylate) and poly(styrene‐co‐acrylonitrile)

The mechanical and heat‐resistant properties of acrylonitrile–butadiene–styrene (ABS) binary and ternary blends were investigated. The relationship of compatibility and properties was discussed. The results show that poly(methyl methacrylate) (PMMA) and styrene–maleic anhydride (SMA) can improve the thermal properties of conventional ABS. The Izod impact property of ABS/PMMA blends increases significantly with the addition of PMMA, whereas that of ABS/SMA blends decreases significantly with the addition of SMA. Blends mixed with high‐viscosity PMMA are characterized by higher heat‐distortion temperature (HDT), and their heat resistance is similar to that of blends mixed with SMA. For high‐viscosity PMMA, from 10 to 20%, it is clear that blends appear at the brittle–ductile transition, which is related to the compatibility of the two phases. TEM micrographs show low‐content and high‐viscosity PMMA in large, abnormally shaped forms in the matrix. Compatibility between PMMA and ABS is dependent on both the amount and the viscosity of PMMA. When the amount of high‐viscosity PMMA varied from 10 to 20 wt %, the morphology of the ABS binary blends varied from poor to satisfactory compatibility. As the viscosity of PMMA decreases, the critical amount of PMMA needed for the compatibility of the two phases also decreases. SMA, as a compatibilizer, improved the interfacial adhesiveness of ABS and PMMA, which results in PMMA having good dispersion in the matrix. © 2002 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 85: 2652–2660, 2002     

Enzymatic degradation of blends of poly(ε‐caprolactone) and poly(styrene‐co‐acrylonitrile) by Pseudomonas lipase

In polymer blends, the composition and microcrystalline structure of the blend near surfaces can be markedly different from the bulk properties. In this study, the enzymatic degradation of poly(ε‐caprolactone) (PCL) and its blends with poly(styrene‐co‐acrylonitrile) (SAN) was conducted in a phosphate buffer solution containing Pseudomonas lipase, and the degradation behavior was correlated with the surface properties and crystalline microstructure of the blends. The enzymatic degradation preferentially took place at the amorphous part of PCL film. The melt‐quenched PCL film with low crystallinity and small lamellar thickness showed a higher degradation rate compared with isothermally crystallized (at 36, 40, and 44°C) PCL films. Also, there was a vast difference in the enzymatic degradation behavior of pure PCL and PCL/SAN blends. The pure PCL showed 100% weight loss in a very short time (i.e., 72 h), whereas the PCL/SAN blend containing just 1% SAN showed ～50% weight loss and the degradation ceased, and the blend containing 40% SAN showed almost no weight loss. These results suggest that as degradation proceeds, the nondegradable SAN content increases at the surface of PCL/SAN films and prevents the lipase from attacking the biodegradable PCL chains. This phenomenon was observed even for a very high PCL content in the blend samples. In the blend with low PCL content, the inaccessibility of the amorphous interphase with high SAN content prevented the attack of lipase on the lamellae of PCL. © 2002 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 83: 868–879, 2002     

Effect of tacticity of poly(methyl methacrylate) on the miscibility with poly(styrene‐co‐acrylonitrile)

Isotactic, atactic, and syndiotactic poly(methyl methacrylates) (PMMAs) (designated as iPMMA, aPMMA, and sPMMA) with approximately the same molecular weight were mixed separately with poly(styrene‐co‐acrylonitrile) (abbreviated as PSAN) containing 25 wt % of acrylonitrile in tetrahydrofuran to make three polymer blend systems. Differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) was used to study the miscibility of these blends. The results showed that the tacticity of PMMA has a definite impact on its miscibility with PSAN. The aPMMA/PSAN and sPMMA/PSAN blends were found to be miscible because all the prepared films were transparent and showed composition dependent glass transition temperatures (T_gs). The glass transition temperatures of the two miscible blends were fitted well by the Fox equation, and no broadening of the glass transition regions was observed. The iPMMA/PSAN blends were found to be immiscible, because most of the cast films were translucent and had two glass transition temperatures. Through the use of a simple binary interaction model, the following comments can be drawn. The isotactic MMA segments seemed to interact differently with styrene and with acrylonitrile segments from atactic or syndiotactic MMA segments. © 1999 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 74: 2894–2899, 1999     

Synthesis and properties of poly(acrylonitrile‐co‐p‐trimethylsilylstyrene) and poly(acrylonitrile‐co‐p‐trimethylsilylstyrene‐co‐styrene)

Copolymerization of acrylonitrile (AN) with p‐trimethylsilylstyrene (TMSS) was carried out at 60°C in bulk and in solution in the presence of 2,2′‐azobisisobutyronitrile (AIBN). The reactivity ratios of AN (M₁) and TMSS (M₂) were determined to be r₁ = 0.068 and r₂ = 0.309. The effects of the AIBN concentration and that of the chain transfer agent CCl₄ on the molecular weights (MWs) of the copolymers were investigated. An increase in the concentrations of AIBN or CCl₄ in solution led to a decrease in MW. Poly(AN‐co‐TMSS‐co‐St) was synthesized in solution using AIBN as the initiator. The molar fraction of AN was 0.415, while the molar ratio of TMSS/St varied from 1 : 1 to 1 : 9. The transition temperatures and thermal and thermooxidative stabilities of poly(AN‐co‐TMSS) and poly(AN‐co‐TMSS‐co‐St) were investigated. The differential scanning calorimeter technique was used to determine the compatibility of the poly(AN‐co‐TMSS) and poly(AN‐co‐TMSS‐co‐St) with commercial poly(AN‐co‐St). All the blends show a single glass transition temperature, which indicates the compatibility of the blend components. The surface film morphology of the blends mentioned above was examined by X‐ray photoelectron spectroscopy. The data obtained indicate that the silicon‐containing copolymer is concentrated in the surface layer. © 2000 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 76: 1920–1928, 2000     

Hydrogen‐bonding interactions between poly(styrene‐co‐methacrylic acid) and poly(styrene‐co‐4‐vinylpyridine)

The complexation behavior between poly(styrene‐co‐methacrylic acid) of different compositions (SMA‐12 or SMA‐29) and poly(styrene‐co‐4‐vinylpyridine) (S4VP‐6 or S4VP‐15) was studied by viscometry and differential scanning calorimetry using tetrahydrofuran (THF) and butan‐2‐one as solvents. This complexation is attributed to the presence of strong intermolecular interactions between the different polymer chains by hydrogen bonding. A single glass‐transition temperature, intermediate between those of the two pure copolymers SMA‐29 and S4VP‐15, was obtained with each composition of the mixture when THF or butan‐2‐one is used as a common solvent. The obtained results showed that the formation of such complexes depends strongly on the nature of the solvent and the contents of the interacting species. The complex formation is inhibited in THF because of the important ability of this latter to interact with the SMA. A quantitative analysis of the interactions between the constituents of these blends was carried out by FTIR spectroscopy. © 2005 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 98: 806–811, 2005     

Effects of the polybutadiene/poly(styrene‐co‐acrylonitrile) ratio in a polybutadiene‐g‐poly(styrene‐co‐acrylonitrile) impact modifier on the morphology and mechanical behavior of acrylonitrile–butadiene–styrene blends

Polybutadiene‐g‐poly(styrene‐co‐acrylonitrile) (PB‐g‐SAN) impact modifiers with different polybutadiene (PB)/poly(styrene‐co‐acrylonitrile) (SAN) ratios ranging from 20.5/79.5 to 82.7/17.3 were synthesized by seeded emulsion polymerization. Acrylonitrile–butadiene–styrene (ABS) blends with a constant rubber concentration of 15 wt % were prepared by the blending of these PB‐g‐SAN copolymers and SAN resin. The influence of the PB/SAN ratio in the PB‐g‐SAN impact modifier on the mechanical behavior and phase morphology of ABS blends was investigated. The mechanical tests showed that the impact strength and yield strength of the ABS blends had their maximum values as the PB/SAN ratio in the PB‐g‐SAN copolymer increased. A dynamic mechanical analysis of the ABS blends showed that the glass‐transition temperature of the rubbery phase shifted to a lower temperature, the maximum loss peak height of the rubbery phase increased and then decreased, and the storage modulus of the ABS blends increased with an increase in the PB/SAN ratio in the PB‐g‐SAN impact modifier. The morphological results of the ABS blends showed that the dispersion of rubber particle in the matrix and its internal structure were influenced by the PB/SAN ratio in the PB‐g‐SAN impact modifiers. © 2005 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 98: 2165–2171, 2005     

Prediction of nonlinear long‐term tensile creep of heterogeneous blends: Rubber‐toughened polypropylene–poly(styrene‐co‐acrylonitrile)

The proposed predictive format for the tensile compliance, D_b(t), of polymer blends is based on (1) a two‐parameter equivalent box model (EBM) and (2) calculations of the phase continuity of components in blends by using modified equations of the percolation theory. The input data encompass (1) selected parameters characterizing the creep of parent polymers and (2) critical volume fractions v_1cr and v_2cr of constituents in blends (delimiting the interval of phase cocontinuity). To describe the effects of time and stress on tensile compliance, a routinely used empirical equation was found suitable. Parameters characterizing the creep of parent polymers and their blends were extracted from generalized dependencies obtained through the superposition of time dependencies of tensile compliance assessed for a series of applied stresses and reconstructed with regard to the strain‐induced free‐volume expansion. Reconstructed dependencies can be approximated by a straight line, which simplifies the predictive format. The comparison of experimental and calculated compliance dependencies shows that the proposed format plausibly predicts the blend creep behavior over the studied interval of 0.1–10,000 min. The upswing in blend compliance after a long period of creeping is attributed to the redistribution of stresses acting on the constituents in the course of the creep under a constant load. This format is believed to have allowed the researchers in this study to anticipate (at least semiquantitatively) the creep behavior of intended blends. © 2003 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 88: 641–651, 2003     

Compatibility of low‐density polyethylene/poly(ethylene‐co‐vinyl acetate) binary blends prepared by melt mixing

The compatibility of low‐density polyethylene and poly(ethylene‐co‐vinyl acetate) containing 18 wt % vinyl acetate units (EVA‐18) was studied. For this purpose, a series of different blends containing 25, 50, or 75 wt % EVA‐18 were prepared by melt mixing with a single‐screw extruder. For each composition, three different sets of blends were prepared, which corresponded to the three different temperatures used in the metering section and the die of the extruder (140, 160, and 180°C), at a screw rotation speed of 42 rpm. Blends that contained 25 wt % EVA‐18 were also prepared through mixing at 140, 160, or 180°C but at a screw speed of 69 rpm. A study of the blends by differential scanning calorimetry showed that all the prepared blends were heterogeneous, except that containing 75 wt % EVA‐18 and prepared at 180°C. However, because of the high interfacial adhesion, a fine dispersion of the minor component in the polymer matrix was observed for all the studied blends with scanning electron microscopy. The tensile strengths and elongations at break of the blends lay between the corresponding values of the two polymers. The absence of any minimum in the mechanical properties was strong evidence that the two polymers were compatible over the whole range of composition. The thermal shrinkage of the blends at various temperatures depended mainly on the temperature and EVA‐18 content. © 2003 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 90: 841–852, 2003     

Miscibility and rheological properties of poly(vinyl chloride)/styrene–acrylonitrile blends prepared by melt extrusion

Styrene–acrylonitrile (SAN) with acrylonitrile (AN) concentrations of 11.6–26 wt % and α‐methylstyrene acrylonitrile (αMSAN) with a wide range of AN concentrations are miscible with poly(vinyl chloride) (PVC) through solution blending. Here we examine the rheological properties and miscibility of PVC/SAN and PVC/αMSAN blends prepared by melt extrusion for commercial applications. We have investigated the rheological properties of the blends with a rheometer and a melt indexer. The PVC/SAN and PVC/αMSAN blends have a low melting torque, a long degradation time, and a high melt index, and this means that they have better processability than pure PVC. The miscibility of the blends has been characterized with differential scanning calorimetry, dynamic mechanical thermal analysis, and advanced rheometrics expansion system analysis. The miscibility of the blends has also been characterized with scanning electron microscopy. The SAN series with AN concentrations of 24–31 wt % is immiscible with PVC by melt extrusion, whereas αMSAN with 31 wt % AN is miscible with PVC, even when they are blended by melt extrusion, because of the strong interaction between PVC and αMSAN. © 2007 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 2007     

Compatibility of poly(butadiene‐co‐acrylonitrile) with poly(L‐lactide) and poly(3‐hydroxybutyrate‐co‐3‐hydroxyvalerate)

Poly(L ‐lactide) (PLLA) and poly(3‐hydrobutyrate‐co‐3‐hydroxyvalerate) (PHBV) were blended with poly(butadiene‐co‐acrylonitrile) (NBR). Both PLLA/NBR and PHBV/NBR blends exhibited higher tensile properties as the content of acrylonitrile unit (AN) of NBR increased from 22 to 50 wt %. However, two separate glass transition temperatures (T_g) appeared in PLLA/NBR blends irrespective of the content of NBR, revealing that PLLA was incompatible with NBR. In contrast, a single T_g, which shifted along with the blend composition, was observed for PHBV/NBR50 blends. Moreover NBR50 suppressed the crystallization of PHBV, indicating that PHBV was compatible with NBR50. Decrease of both elongation modulus and stress at maximum load was less significant and increase of elongation at break was more pronounced in PHBV/NBR50 blends than in PLLA/NBR50 blends. © 2004 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 92: 3508–3513, 2004