Acrylonitrile–butadiene–styrene toughened nylon 6: The influences of compatibilizer on morphology and impact properties

Polymer alloys have been used as an alternative to obtain polymeric materials with unique physical properties. Generally, the polymer mixture is incompatible, which makes it necessary to use a compatibilizer to improve the interfacial adhesion. Nylon 6 (PA6) is an attractive polymer to use in engineering applications, but it has processing instability and relatively low notched impact strength. In this study, the acrylonitrile–butadiene–styrene (ABS) triblock copolymer was used as an impact modifier for PA6. Poly(methyl methacrylate‐co‐maleic anyhydride) (MMA‐MA) and poly(methyl methacrylate‐co‐glycidyl methacrylate) (MMA‐GMA) were used as compatibilizers for this blend. The morphology and impact strength of the blends were evaluated as a function of blend composition and the presence of compatibilizers. The blends compatibilized with maleated copolymer exhibited an impact strength up to 800 J/m and a morphology with ABS domains more efi8ciently dispersed. Moderate amounts of MA functionality in the compatibilizer (～5%) and small amounts of compatibilizer in the blend (～5%) appear sufficient to improve the impact properties and ABS dispersion. © 2002 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 87: 842–847, 2003     

Compatibilization of polypropylene/ poly(3‐hydroxybutyrate) blends

Blending polypropylene (PP) with biodegradable poly(3‐hydroxybutyrate) (PHB) can be a nice alternative to minimize the disposal problem of PP and the intrinsic brittleness that restricts PHB applications. However, to achieve acceptable engineering properties, the blend needs to be compatibilized because of the immiscibility between PP and PHB. In this work, PP/PHB blends were prepared with different types of copolymers as possible compatibilizers: poly(propylene‐g‐maleic anhydride) (PP–MAH), poly (ethylene‐co‐methyl acrylate) [P(E–MA)], poly(ethylene‐co‐glycidyl methacrylate) [P(E–GMA)], and poly(ethylene‐co‐methyl acrylate‐co‐glycidyl methacrylate) [P(E–MA–GMA)]. The effect of each copolymer on the morphology and mechanical properties of the blends was investigated. The results show that the compatibilizers efficiency decreased in this order: P(E–MA–GMA) > P(E–MA) > P(E–GMA) > PP–MAH; we explained this by taking into consideration the affinity degree of the compatibilizers with the PP matrix, the compatibilizers properties, and their ability to provide physical and/or reactive compatibilization with PHB. © 2011 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci, 2012     

Application of styrene‐acrylonitrile random copolymer–polyarylate block copolymer as reactive compatibilizer for polyamide and acrylonitrile‐butadiene‐styrene blends

Styrene‐acrylonitrile random copolymer (SAN) and polyarylate (PAr) block copolymer were applied as a reactive compatibilizer for polyamide‐6 (PA‐6)/acrylonitrile‐butadiene‐styrene (ABS) copolymer blends. The SAN–PAr block copolymer was found to be effective for compatibilization of PA‐6/ABS blends. With the addition of 3.0–5.0 wt % SAN–PAr block copolymer, the ABS‐rich phase could be reduced to a smaller size than 1.0 μm in the 70/30 and 50/50 PA‐6/ABS blends, although it was several microns in the uncompatibilized blends. As a result, for the blends compatibilized with 3–5 wt % block copolymer the impact energy absorption reached the super toughness region in the 70/30 and 50/50 PA‐6/ABS compositions. The compatibilization mechanism of PA‐6/ABS by the SAN–PAr block copolymer was investigated by tetrahydrofuran extraction of the SAN–PAr block copolymer/PA‐6 blends and the model reactions between the block copolymer and low molecular weight compounds. The results of these experiments indicated that the SAN–PAr block copolymer reacted with the PA‐6 during the melt mixing process via an in situ transreaction between the ester units in the PAr chain and the terminal amine in the PA‐6. As a result, SAN–PAr/PA‐6 block copolymers were generated during the melt mixing process. The SAN–PAr block copolymer was supposed to compatibilize the PA‐6 and ABS blend by anchoring the PAr/PA‐6 and SAN chains to the PA‐6 and ABS phases, respectively. © 2002 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 83: 2300–2313, 2002     

Influence of acrylonitrile–butadiene–styrene (ABS) morphology and poly(styrene‐co‐acrylonitrile) (SAN) content on fracture behavior of ABS/SAN blends

This study attempted to correlate morphological changes and physical properties for a high rubber content acrylonitrile–butadiene–styrene (ABS) and its diluted blends with a poly(styrene‐co‐acrylonitrile) (SAN) copolymer. The results showed a close relationship between rubber content and fracture toughness for the blends. The change of morphology in ABS/SAN blends explains in part some deviations in fracture behavior observed in ductile–brittle transition temperature shifts. © 2004 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 92: 2606–2611, 2004     

Phase morphology development during processing of compatibilized and uncompatibilized PBT/ABS blends

The development of the multiphase morphology of uncompatibilized blends of poly(butylene terephthalate) (PBT) and acrylonitrile–butadiene–styrene terpolymer (ABS) and PBT/ABS blends compatibilized with methyl‐methacrylate glycidyl‐methacrylate (MMA‐GMA) reactive copolymers during compounding in a twin‐screw extruder and subsequent injection molding was investigated. Uncompatibilized PBT/ABS 60/40 (wt %) and compatibilized PBT/ABS/MMA‐GMA with 2 and 5 wt % of MMA‐GMA showed refined cocontinuous morphologies at the front end of the extruder, which coarsened towards the extruder outlet. Coarsening in uncompatibilized PBT/ABS blends is much more pronounced than in the compatibilized PBT/ABS/MMA‐GMA equivalents and decreases with increasing amounts of the MMA‐GMA. For both systems, significant refinement on the phase morphology was found to occur after the blends pass through the extruder die. This phenomenon was correlated to the capacity of the die in promoting particles break‐up due to the extra elongational stresses developed at the matrix entrance. Injection molding induces coarsening of the ABS domains in the case of uncompatibilized PBT/ABS blends, while the reactive blend kept its refined phase morphology. Therefore, the compatibilization process of PBT/ABS/MMA‐GMA blends take place progressively leading to a further refinement of the phase morphology in the latter steps, owing to the slow reaction rate relative to epoxide functions and the carboxyl/hydroxyl groups. © 2007 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 104: 102–110, 2007     

Polyoxymethylene/ethylene butylacrylate copolymer/ethylene‐methyl acrylate‐glycidyl methacrylate ternary blends

Blends of compatibilized polyoxymethylene (POM)/ethylene butylacrylate copolymer (EBA)/ethylene‐methyl acrylate‐glycidyl methacrylate copolymer (EMA‐GMA) and uncompatibilized POM/EBA were investigated. The notched impact strength of the compatibilized blends was higher than that of their uncompatibilized counterparts. The toughness of the POM blends was improved obviously with relatively low loading of EBA. Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR) spectra of EMA‐GMA, pure POM, and POM/EBA/EMA‐GMA blends indicated that epoxy groups of EMA‐GMA reacted with terminal hydroxyl groups of POM molecular chains. The glass‐transition temperature (T_g) values of the POM matrix and the EBA phase were observed shifted to each other in the presence of EMA‐GMA compatibilizer indicating that the compatibilized blends had better compatibility than their uncompatibilized counterparts. With the addition of EBA to POM, both the compatibilized and uncompatibilized blends showed higher onset degradation temperature (T_d) than that of pure POM and the T_d values of the compatibilized blends were higher than those of their uncompatibilized counterparts. The scanning electron microscopy showed better EBA particles distribution state in the compatibilized system than in the uncompatibilized one. The compatibilized blend with an obvious rougher impact fracture surface indicated the ductile fracture mode. POLYM. ENG. SCI., 58:1127–1134, 2018. © 2017 Society of Plastics Engineers     

Influence of epoxy resin on the properties of maleic anhydride functionalized acrylonitrile–butadiene–styrene copolymer toughened polyamide 6 blends

Maleic anhydride functionalized acrylonitrile–butadiene–styrene copolymer (ABS‐g‐MA) was used as an impact modifier of polyamide 6 (PA6). Epoxy resin was introduced into PA6/ABS‐g‐MA blends to further improve their properties. Notched Izod impact tests showed that the impact strength of PA6/ABS‐g‐MA could be improved from 253 to 800 J/m with the addition of epoxy resin when the ABS‐g‐MA content was set at 25 wt %. Differential scanning calorimetry results showed that the addition of epoxy resin made the crystallization temperature and melting temperature shift to lower temperatures; this indicated the decrease in the PA6 crystallization ability. Dynamic mechanical analysis testing showed that the addition of epoxy resin induced the glass‐transition temperature of PA6 and the styrene‐co‐acrylonitrile copolymer phase to shift to higher temperatures due to the chemical reactions between PA6, ABS‐g‐MA, and epoxy resin. The scanning electron microscopy results indicated that the ABS‐g‐MA copolymer dispersed into the PA6 matrix uniformly and that the phase morphology of the PA6/ABS‐g‐MA blends did not change with the addition of the epoxy resin. Transmission electron microscopy showed that the epoxy resin did not change the deformation mechanisms of the PA6/ABS‐g‐MA blends. © 2011 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci, 2011     

Effects of olefin‐based compatibilizers on the morphology,thermal and mechanical properties of ABS/polyamide‐6 blends

In this study, commercially available epoxidized and maleated olefinic copolymers, EMA‐GMA (ethylene‐methyl acrylate‐glycidyl methacrylate) and EnBACO‐MAH (ethylene‐n butyl acrylate‐carbon monoxide‐maleic anhydride), were used at 0, 5, and 10% by weight to compatibilize the blend composed of ABS (acrylonitrile‐butadiene‐styrene) terpolymer and PA6 (polyamide 6). Compatibilizing performance of these two olefinic polymers was investigated from blend morphologies, thermal and mechanical properties as a function of blend composition, and compatibilizer loading level. Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) studies showed that incorporation of compatibilizer resulted in a fine morphology with reduced dispersed particle diameter at the presence of 5% compatibilizer. The crystallization behavior of PA6 phase in the blends was explored for selected blend compositions by differential scanning calorimetry (DSC). At high compatibilizer level a decrease in the degree of crystallization was observed. In 10% compatibilizer containing blends, formation of γ‐crystals was observed contrary to other compatibilizer compositions. The behavior of the compatibilized blend system in tensile testing showed the negative effect of using excess compatibilizer. Different trends in yield strengths and strain at break values were observed depending on compatibilizer type, loading level, and blend composition. With 5% EnBACO‐MAH, the blend toughness was observed to be the highest at room temperature. © 2007 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 104: 926–935, 2007     

Toughening of polyamide 6 with a maleic anhydride functionalized acrylonitrile–butadiene–styrene copolymer

Maleic anhydride functionalized acrylonitrile–butadiene–styrene (ABS‐g‐MA) copolymers were prepared via an emulsion polymerization process. The ABS‐g‐MA copolymers were used to toughen polyamide 6 (PA‐6). Fourier transform infrared results show that the maleic anhydride (MA) grafted onto the polybutadiene phase of acrylonitrile–butadiene–styrene (ABS). Rheological testing identified chemical reactions between PA‐6 and ABS‐g‐MA. Transmission electron microscopy and scanning electron microscopy displayed the compatibilization reactions between MA of ABS‐g‐MA and the amine and/or amide groups of PA‐6 chain ends, which improved the disperse morphology of the ABS‐g‐MA copolymers in the PA‐6 matrix. The blends compatibilized with ABS‐g‐MA exhibited notched impact strengths of more than 900 J/m. A 1 wt % concentration of MA in ABS‐g‐MA appeared sufficient to improve the impact properties and decreased the brittle–ductile transition temperature from 50 to 10°C. Scanning electron microscopy results show that the shear yielding of the PA‐6 matrix was the major toughening mechanism. © 2008 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci, 2008     

Blends of poly(vinyl chloride) (PVC)/natural rubber‐g‐(styrene‐co‐methyl methacrylate) for improved impact resistance of PVC

To improve the mechanical properties of poly(vinyl chloride) (PVC), the possibility of combining PVC with elastomers was considered. Modification of natural rubber (NR) by graft copolymerization with methyl methacrylate (MMA) and styrene (St) was carried out by emulsion polymerization by using redox initiator to provide an impact modifier for PVC. The impact resistance, dynamic mechanical analysis (DMA), and scanning electron microscopy (SEM) of St and MMA grafted NR [NR‐g‐(St‐co‐MMA)]/PVC (graft copolymer product contents of 5, 10, and 15%) blends were investigated as a function of the amount of graft copolymer product. It was found that the impact strength of blends was increased with an increase of the graft copolymer product content. DMA studies showed that NR‐g‐(St‐co‐MMA) has partial compatibility with PVC. SEM confirmed a shift from brittle failure to ductility with an increase graft copolymer content in the blends. The mechanical properties showed that NR‐g‐(St‐co‐MMA) interacts well with PVC and can also be used as an impact modifier for PVC. © 2004 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 93: 1666–1672, 2004     

Synthesis and characterization of binary copolymers of methyl methacrylate with glycidyl methacrylate and 2‐hydroxy ethyl methacrylate as carriers for cellulase

Cellulase was immobilized directly on methyl methacrylate‐glycidyl methacrylate copolymer (MMA‐co‐GMA) and methyl methacrylate‐2‐hydroxy ethyl methacrylate copolymer (MMA‐co‐HEMA) by covalent attachment and crosslinking methods. The properties of the immobilized cellulase were investigated and compared with those of the free one. For the assays carried out through crosslinking method at 25°C and pH 7, the retained activities were found to be 91.92% and 74.63%, respectively, for MMA‐co‐GMA and MMA‐co‐HEMA crosslinked with 0.1% of 1‐cyclohexyl‐3‐(2‐morpholino‐ethyl) carbodiimide metho‐p‐toluenesulfonate (CMCT), respectively. The immobilized cellulase had better stability and higher retained activities with respect to pH, temperature, and storage stability than the free one. In the repeated use experiments, the immobilized cellulase using (MMA‐co‐GMA)‐CMCT (0.1%) and (MMA‐co‐HEMA)‐CMCT (0.1%) did not change after 10 and eight times of repeated use and maintained 67% and 62% from their original activities after 25 times, respectively. © 2010 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci, 2010     

Micromechanical processes and failure phenomena in reactively compatibilized blends of polyamide 6 and styrenic polymers. I. Polyamide 6/acrylonitrile– butadiene–styrene copolymer blends

In this work, in situ investigations of the micromechanical properties of reactively compatibilized blends of polyamide 6 (PA6) and an acrylonitrile–butadiene–styrene copolymer (ABS) were performed with transmission electron microscopy. Three PA6/ABS blends were prepared with a disperse morphology (inclusions of PA6 or ABS) and with a cocontinuous structure. The objective of this work was to study the deformation of the inclusions and the interface between the PA6 phase and the ABS phase. Our transmission electron microscopy investigations revealed that the morphology of the blends was strongly influenced by the asymmetric nature of the interface between PA6 and ABS. In the blends with a PA6 matrix, the interface between PA6 and the ABS inclusions was deformed in tensile deformation under uniaxial loading. A strong influence of the PA6 water content on the (micro)mechanical behavior was observed. Although the “dry” blends behaved in a brittle fashion, the “wet” blends behaved in a ductile fashion with the formation of deformation bands in the matrix (PA6 or ABS), which were initiated by stress concentration at the particles (ABS or PA6, respectively). © 2009 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci, 2009     

Blends of poly(2,6‐dimethyl‐1,4‐phenylene oxide)/polyamide 6 toughened by maleated polystyrene‐based copolymers: Mechanical properties,morphology, and rheology

Poly(2,6‐dimethyl‐1,4‐phenylene oxide)/polyamide 6 (PPO/PA6 30/70) blends were impact modified by addition of three kinds of maleated polystyrene‐based copolymers, i.e., maleated styrene‐ethylene‐butylene‐styrene copolymer (SEBS‐g‐MA), maleated methyl methacrylate‐butadiene‐styrene copolymer (MBS‐g‐MA), and maleated acrylonitrile‐butadiene‐styrene copolymer (ABS‐g‐MA). The mechanical properties, morphology and rheological behavior of the impact modified PPO/PA6 blends were investigated. The selective location of the maleated copolymers in one phase or at interface accounted for the different toughening effects of the maleated copolymer, which is closely related to their molecular structure and composition. SEBS‐g‐MA was uniformly dispersed in PPO phase and greatly toughened PPO/PA6 blends even at low temperature. MBS‐g‐MA particles were mainly dispersed in the PA6 phase and around the PPO phase, resulting in a significant enhancement of the notched Izod impact strength of PPO/PA6 blends from 45 J/m to 281 J/m at the MBS‐g‐MA content of 20 phr. In comparison, the ABS‐g‐MA was mainly dispersed in PA6 phase without much influencing the original mechanical properties of the PPO/PA6 blend. The different molecule structure and selective location of the maleated copolymers in the blends were reflected by the change of rheological behavior as well. © 2009 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci, 2010     

Compatibilization and elastomer toughening of polyamide‐6 (PA6)/poly(phenylene ether) (PPE) blends

In the elastomer‐modified (polyamide‐6/poly(phenylene ether) (PA6/PPE) = 50/50 blends, poly(styrene‐co‐maleic anhydride) (SMA) was demonstrated to be an efficient reactive compatibilizer. The G1651 elastomer was shown to be an effective impact modifier to result in superior toughness and heat‐deflection temperature (HDT) than is the 1901X elastomer for the SMA‐compatibilized blends because G1651 particles exclusively reside within the dispersed PPE phase but 1901X particles tend to distribute in the PA6 matrix and/or along the interface. The apparent average diameter of the dispersed PPE phase is insignificantly dependent on the elastomer content in the G1651‐modified blend, whereas it increases with increase of the elastomer content in the 1901X‐modified blend. Moreover, there exists a critical elastomer content, 15 phr, for the ductile–brittle transition of the G1651‐modified SMA‐modified PA6/PPE blends. © 1999 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 74: 23–32, 1999     

Polymer blends of poly(ethylene‐2,6‐naphthalate) with polystyrene compatibilized by styrene‐glycidyl methacrylate copolymers. I. Rheology,morphology, and mechanical properties

The compatibilization of blends of poly(ethylene‐2,6‐naphthalate) (PEN) with polystyrene (PS), through the styrene‐glycidyl methacrylate copolymers (SG) containing various glycidyl methacrylate (GMA) contents, was investigated in this study. SG copolymers are able to react with PEN terminal groups during melt blending, resulting in the formation of desirable SG‐g‐PEN copolymers in the blend. These in situ formed copolymers tend to reside along the interface preferentially as the result of interfacial reaction and thus function as effective compatibilizers in PEN/PS blends. The compatibilized blends exhibit higher viscosity, finer phase domain, and improved mechanical properties. It is found that the degree of grafting of the in situ formed SG‐g‐PEN copolymer has to be considered as well. In blends compatibilized with the SG copolymer containing higher GMA content, heavily grafted copolymers would be produced. The length of the styrene segment in these heavily grafted copolymers would be too short to penetrate deep enough into the PS phase to form effective entanglements, resulting in the lower compatibilization efficiency in PEN/PS blends. Consequently, the in situ formation of SG‐g‐PEN copolymers with an optimal degree of grafting is the key to achieving the best performance for the eventually produced PEN/PS blends through SG copolymers. © 2002 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 87: 967–975, 2003     

Effect of processing parameters on the mechanical properties of in situ compatibilized polybutylene terephthalate/acrylonitrile–butadiene–styrene blends

To evaluate mechanical properties of blends prepared by intermeshing corotating twin‐screw extrusion (ICTSE), it is usually necessary to injection mold specimens after the extrusion mixing process. At this study an alternative method is used to obtain testing specimens from ribbons extruded polybutylene terephthalate/acrylonitrile–butadiene–styrene blends, (PBT/ABS), compatibilized with methyl methacrylate–glycidyl methacrylate‐ethyl acrylate (MGE) by ICTSE, and then to correlate their mechanical properties with the processing parameters. Regarding to the extrusion process parameters, it has been noted that higher feed rates, lower screw speeds and narrower kneading blocks have reduced the ductile‐brittle transition temperature (DBTT) of the compatibilized PBT/ABS blends, thereby suggesting that the molecule integrity of blend polymeric components has been preserved and that a good dispersion of the ABS domains in the PBT matrix has been achieved. Injection molded PBT/ABS blends were obtained to compare to the extruded ribbons. The mechanical tests for both specimens have shown the same trends. The injection molded samples have presented poorer impact strength, tensile strain at break and tensile strength, when compared to the respective extruded samples. That behavior has been attributed to the high level of molecular orientation resulting from the injection molding process and mainly to PBT degradation during process. The PBT degradation could have increased its degree of crystallinity, which has been confirmed by DSC measurements. As result, the blend became more brittle, decreasing its Izod impact strength. © 2011 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci, 2012     

Relationship between interfacial tension and dispersed‐phase particle size in polymer blends. II. PP/PA6

Simple blends with different viscosity ratios of the components as well as compatibilized blends varying both in type and content of the compatibilizers were used to study the relation between the interfacial tension and the dispersed‐phase particle size for PP/PA6 (80/20 wt %) blends in this work. Four compatibilizing systems including poly(ethylene‐co‐methacrylic acid) ionomers, a maleic anhydride‐grafted propylene copolymer, maleic anhydride‐grafted polypropylene, and a maleic anhydride‐grafted styrene ethylene butylene copolymer were used. For blends prepared in an internal mixer, a power‐law relation was found between the capillary number and the torque ratio of the blends' components. This relation was used to estimate the interfacial tension for the compatibilized blends. The relation between the steady‐state torque of the blends as a measure of viscosity and the estimated values of interfacial tension were also investigated. © 2003 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 88: 54–63, 2003     

Synthesis and property behavior of dioctyl phthalate plasticized styrene–acrylate particles by Shirasu porous glass emulsification and subsequent suspension copolymerization

Two‐phase model styrene–acrylate copolymers were synthesized with a soft phase consisting of methyl acrylate, butyl acrylate, and butyl methacrylate. Besides the styrenic copolymers, copolymers containing a hard phase of methyl methacylate and methyl acrylate were also synthesized. Comonomer droplets with a narrow size distribution and fair uniformity were prepared using an SPG (Shirasu porous glass) membrane having pore size of 0.90 μm. After the single‐step SPG emulsion, the emulsion droplets were composed mainly of monomers, hydrophobic additives, and an oil‐soluble initiator, suspended in the aqueous phase containing a stabilizer and inhibitor. These were then transferred to a reactor, and subsequent suspension polymerization was carried out. Uniform copolymer particles with a mean diameter ranging from 3 to 7 μm, depending on the recipe, with a narrow particle size distribution and a coefficient of variation of about 10% were achieved. Based on the glass‐transition temperatures, as measured by differential scanning calorimetry, the resulting copolymer particles containing a soft phase of acrylate were better compatibilized with a hard phase of methyl methacrylate than with styrene with dioctyl phthalate (DOP) addition. Glass‐transition temperatures of poly(MMA‐co‐MA) particles were strongly affected by the composition drift in the copolymer caused by their substantial difference in reactivity ratios. Incorporation of DOP in the copolymer particles does not significantly affect the glass‐transition temperature of MMA‐ or MA‐containing copolymer particles, but it does affect the St‐containing copolymer and particle morphology of the copolymers. © 2003 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 90: 3037–3050, 2003     

Toughening of PP/EPDM blend by compatibilization

To improve the mechanical properties of blends of polypropylene (PP) and terpolymer of ethylene–propylene–diene (EPDM), a triblock copolymer, (PP‐g‐MAH)‐co‐[PA‐6,6]‐co‐(EPDM‐g‐MAH), was synthesized by coupling reaction of maleic anhydride (MAH)‐grafted PP (PP‐g‐MAH), EPDM‐g‐MAH, and PA‐6,6. The newly prepared block copolymer brought about a physical interlocking between the blend components, and imparted a compatibilizing effect to the blends. Introducing the block copolymer to the blends up to 5 wt % lead to formation of a β‐form crystal. The wide‐angle X‐ray diffractograms measured in the region of 2θ between 10° and 50° ascertained that incorporating the block copolymer gave a new peak at 2θ = 15.8°. The new peak was assigned to the (300) plane spacings of the β‐hexagonal crystal structure. In addition, the block copolymer notably improved the low‐temperature impact property of the PP/EPDM blends. The optimum usage level of the compatibilizer proved to be 0.5 wt %. © 2000 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 78: 1267–1274, 2000     

High‐frequency welding of thermoplastic LLDPE/PA 6/PE‐g‐MAH ternary blends

High frequency (HF) welding of linear low density polyethylene (LLDPE) melt blends with polyamide 6 (PA6) was done at 27.12 MHz using maleic anhydride grafted polyethylene (PE‐g‐MAH) as compatibilizer. HF welding was not possible for the blends at room temperature, but possible at higher temperatures (50, 80°C) although the maximum relaxation frequency was lower than the operating frequency. Greater dielectric constant, dissipation factor, and welding performance were obtained when PA 6 was premixed with PE‐g‐MAH rather than the one‐shot process where all the components were mixed simultaneously. This was interpreted in terms of lowered viscosity of PA 6 phase, which encapsulates the flow effectively and provides great skin effect. Also, the peeling force of resin–resin was greater than resin–nylon mesh due to the higher melting temperature and vacancy of nylon mesh. © 2008 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci, 2008