More Church–Rosser Proofs

The proofs of the Church–Rosser theorems for , , and reduction in untyped -calculus are formalized in Isabelle/HOL, an implementation of Higher Order Logic in the generic theorem prover Isabelle. For -reduction, both the standard proof and Takahashi's are given and compared. All proofs are based on a general theory of commutating relations that supports an almost geometric style of reasoning about confluence diagrams.     

The informed neuron: Issues in the use of information theory in the behavioral sciences

The concept of information is virtually ubiquitous in contemporary cognitive science. It is claimed to be processed (in cognitivist theories of perception and comprehension), stored (in cognitivist theories of memory and recognition), and otherwise manipulated and transformed by the human central nervous system. Fred Dretske's extensive philosophical defense of a theory of informational content (semantic information) based upon the Shannon-Weaver formal theory of information is subjected to critical scrutiny. A major difficulty is identified in Dretske's equivocations in the use of the concept of a signal bearing informational content. Gibson's alternative conception of information (construed as analog by Dretske), while avoiding many of the problems located in the conventional use of signal, raises different but equally serious questions. It is proposed that, taken literally, the human CNS does not extract or process information at all; rather, whatever information is construed as locatable in the CNS is information only for an observer-theorist and only for certain purposes.Blood courses through our veins, andinformation through our central nervous system.— A Neuropsychology Textbook.     

Eine bedingte Form der Integral-Ungleichung von Gronwall,leichte Verallgemeinerung eines Stabilitätssatzes von Perron und überlauffreie Skalierung von Analogrechenschaltungen

Zusammenfassung Es geht in dieser Arbeit in der Hauptsache darum, ein vorgelegtes Differentialgleichungssystem so zu skalieren, daß in der zugehörigen Analogrechnerschaltung die Spannungen an den Ausgängen der Integratoren die durch die Referenzspannung einerseits und durch das Auflösevermögen andererseits gesetzten Schranken nicht über- bzw. unterschreiten. Es werden Abschätzungssätze hergeleitet, die diese Frage im Apriori-Sinn, also ohne die Lösung des Differentialgleichungssystems zu kennen, zu lösen gestatten. Zur Abschätzung werden zunächst Normen, dannKamke-Normen verwendet. Der im Titel erwähnte Satz vonPerron ergibt sich durch spezielle Normengebung und Verzicht auf Abschätzung nach unten. Erschwert werden die Betrachtungen durch die relative Schwäche der Forderung, daß die rechte Seite des Systemsdx/dt=f(x,t) der Bedingung aus xa folgt f(x,t)v(t)x genüge (...:=Norm,a positiv reell). Dadurch scheint es bei Abschätzungen mitKamke-Normen nicht mehr möglich, von den in der Literatur über Existenzbeweise und Abschätzungssätze üblichen Methoden Gebrauch zu machen. Zur Lösung dieser Frage wird eine bedingte Form des bekannten Satzes vonGronwall (auch Satz vonBellman genannt) entwickelt.

---

A conditional version of the integral inequality of gronwall, a slight generalization of a stability theorem of perron, and overflow-free scaling of analogue computer set-ups

Summary The main subject of this paper is the scaling of a given set of differential equations in such a way that the output voltages of the integrators of the associated analogue computer set-up do not exceed certain upper and lower bounds imposed by the reference voltage and the limited power of resolution of the elements of the analogue computer. The paper gives a priori bounds on the solution of the differential set. Some of these bounds work with norms, others withKamke-norms.Perron's stability theorem mentioned in the title of this paper results by inserting special norms and neglecting lower bounds. A difficulty arises by the relative weakness of the condition xa implies f(x,t)v(t)x on the right hand side of the setdx/dt=f(x,t), where ... is any norm anda is a positive real constant. As a consequence of this, it seems no longer possible to use the usual techniques known from the literature on existence theorems and bounds for the solution of differential equations. To cope with this situation, a conditional version of the well-known theorem ofGronwall (also known by the name of Lemma ofBellman) will be derived.

---

Diese Arbeit ist Teil einer am Institut für Angewandte Mathematik der Technischen Hochschule München unter Anleitung von Herrn o. Prof. Dr. rer. nat. habil.J. Heinhold angefertigten Dissertation.     

Informatik als Grundbildung

Im Teil II Bildung von Elementarsätzen wird der Teil Namengebung und Kennzeichnung vorbereitet. Seine Überschrift könnte auch lauten: Was sind Nominatoren und wie kommen sie zustande? Teil V ist wie seine Vorgänger Teil III Gleichheit und Abstraktion und Teil IV Objektsprache/Metasprache als eine Erweiterung einer rationalen Grammatik aufzufassen. Der noch folgende Teil VI Logik und Geltungsicherung von Behauptungen schließt die Serie Informatik als Grundbildung ab.     

Deterministic sequential functions

The simple rational partial functions accepted by generalized sequential machines are shown to coincide with the compositions _P ^–1 , where _P consists of the prefix codings. The rational functions accepted by generalized sequential machines are proved to coincide with the compositions _P ^–1 , where is the family of endmarkers and is the family of removals of endmarkers. (The compositions are read from left to right). We also show that _P ^–1 is the family of the subsequential functions.This work was partially supported by the Esprit Basic Research Action Working Group No. 3166 ASMICS, the CNRS and the Academy of Finland     

Top-down development of layered fault tolerant systems and its problems — a deontic perspective

Although the top-down development paradigm has successfully been applied to master the complexity of large systems, it has not yet been accepted as a useful paradigm for fault tolerant system design. This is mainly due to a problem that is sometimes referred to as the lazy programmers paradox. The lazy programmer paradox was already present and solved in top-down development methods for non-critical systems. However, the problem has re-appeared in an even more serious variant for critical systems. A few toy examples concerning exception handling in an Ada-like language are used to explain and illustrate the paradox. One possible solution to the problem is to use a specification language in which one can express that certain behaviours of a system are preferred over others. This paper proposes deontic logic as such a specification language. Therefore, a short and rather informal introduction to deontic logic is included. A non-trivial example is included to illustrate how deontic logic can be used to solve the lazy programmer paradox.Supported by NWO/SION Project 612-316-022: Fault Tolerance: Paradigms, Models, Logics, Construction.     

Choosing reference classes and building provisional models

A well-known problem in default logic is the ability of naive reasoners to explain bothg and ¬g from a set of observations. This problem is treated in at least two different ways within that camp.One approach is examination of the various explanations and choosing among them on the basis of various explanation comparators. A typical comparator is choosing the explanation that depends on the most specific observation, similar to the notion of narrowest reference class.Others examine default extensions of the observations and choose whatever is true in any extension, or what is true in all extensions or what is true in preferred extensions. Default extensions are sometimes thought of as acceptable models of the world that are discarded as more knowledge becomes available.We argue that the notions of specificity and extension lack clear semantics. Furthermore, we show that the problems these ideas were supposed to solve can be handled easily within a probabilistic framework.     

Reaping the whirlwind: Reply to Harnad's “other bodies,other minds”

Harnad's proposed robotic upgrade of Turing's Test (TT), from a test of linguistic capacity alone to a Total Turing Test (TTT) of linguisticand sensorimotor capacity, conflicts with his claim that no behavioral test provides even probable warrant for attributions of thought because there is no evidence of consciousness besides private experience. Intuitive, scientific, and philosophical considerations Harnad offers in favor of his proposed upgrade are unconvincing. I agree with Harnad that distinguishing real from as if thought on the basis of (presence or lack of) consciousness (thus rejecting Turing (behavioral) testing as sufficient warrant for mental attribution)has the skeptical consequence Harnad accepts — there is in factno evidence for me that anyone else but me has a mind. I disagree with hisacceptance of it! It would be better to give up the neo-Cartesian faith in private conscious experience underlying Harnad's allegiance to Searle's controversial Chinese Room Experiment than give up all claim to know others think. It would be better to allow that (passing) Turing's Test evidences — evenstrongly evidences — thought.     

Playing Detective: Reconstructing Software Architecture from Available Evidence

Because a system's software architecture strongly influences its quality attributes such as modifiability, performance, and security, it is important to analyze and reason about that architecture. However, architectural documentation frequently does not exist, and when it does, it is often out of sync with the implemented system. In addition, it is rare that software development begins with a clean slate; systems are almost always constrained by existing legacy code. As a consequence, we need to be able to extract information from existing system implementations and utilize this information for architectural reasoning. This paper presents Dali, an open, lightweight workbench that aids an analyst in extracting, manipulating, and interpreting architectural information. By assisting in the reconstruction of architectures from extracted information, Dali helps an analyst redocument architectures, discover the relationship between as-implemented and as-designed architectures, analyze architectural quality attributes and plan for architectural change.     

Directional differentiation of marginal functions in mathematical programming problems

We consider regular mathematical programming problems of the form f(x, y) inf, y F(x), x Rⁿ, where F(x) = {y R^m h_i| (x, y) 0, , h_i (x, y) = 0, . The directional derivatives offunctions (x) = inf{f(x, y)|y F(x)} are estimated.Translated from Kibernetika i Sistemnyi Analiz, No. 6, pp. 70–77, November–December, 1991.     

Definability of Polyadic Lifts of Generalized Quantifiers

We study generalized quantifiers on finite structures.With every function : we associate a quantifier Q by letting Q x say there are at least (n) elementsx satisfying , where n is the sizeof the universe. This is the general form ofwhat is known as a monotone quantifier of type < 1 >.We study so called polyadic liftsof such quantifiers. The particular lifts we considerare Ramseyfication, branching and resumption.In each case we get exact criteria fordefinability of the lift in terms of simpler quantifiers.     

Is Solar System Stable? A Remark

It is not yet known (1997) whether the Solar system is stable or not. Common belief is that the Solar system is stable if and only if it is not a resonant system, i.e., whenever its orbital frequencies i satisfy an inequality | nii| for i|ni| N; a similar inequality is true for randomly chosen frequencies. In this paper, we show that the Solar system does not have such resonances, and therefore (if the above-mentioned belief is correct), it is stable.     

Hierarchy theorems for two-way finite state transducers

Summary For a family of languages , CAL() is defined as the family of images of under nondeterministic two-way finite state transducers, while FINITE · VISIT() is the closure of under deterministic two-way finite state transducers; CAL⁰()= and for n0, CAL ⁿ⁺¹()=CAL ⁿ (CAL()). For any semiAFL , if FINITE · VISIT() CAL(), then CAL ⁿ () forms a proper hierarchy and for every n0, FINITE · VISIT(CALⁿ()) CAL ⁿ⁺¹() FINITE · VISIT(CAL ⁿ⁺¹()). If is a SLIP semiAFL or a weakly k-iterative full semiAFL or a semiAFL contained in any full bounded AFL, then FINITE · VISIT() CAL() and in the last two cases, FINITE · VISIT(). If is a substitution closed full principal semiAFL and FINITE · VISIT(), then FINITE · VISIT() CAL(). If is a substitution closed full principal semiAFL generated by a language without an infinite regular set and ₁ is a full semiAFL, then is contained in CAL^m(₁) if and only if it is contained in ₁. Among the applications of these results are the following. For the following families , CAL ⁿ () forms a proper hierarchy: =INDEXED, =ETOL, and any semiAFL contained in CF. The family CF is incomparable with CAL ^m (NESA) where NESA is the family of one-way nonerasing stack languages and INDEXED is incomparable with CAL ^m (STACK) where STACK is the family of one-way stack languages.This work was supported in part by the National Science Foundation under Grants No. DCR74-15091 and MCS-78-04725     

A New Class of Depth-Size Optimal Parallel Prefix Circuits

Given n values x₁, x₂, ... ,x_n and an associative binary operation o, the prefix problem is to compute x₁ox₂o··· ox_i, 1in. Many combinational circuits for solving the prefix problem, called prefix circuits, have been designed. It has been proved that the size s(D(n)) and the depth d(D(n)) of an n-input prefix circuit D(n) satisfy the inequality d(D(n))+s(D(n))2n–2; thus, a prefix circuit is depth-size optimal if d(D(n))+s(D(n))=2n–2. In this paper, we construct a new depth-size optimal prefix circuit SL(n). In addition, we can build depth-size optimal prefix circuits whose depth can be any integer between d(SL(n)) and n–1. SL(n) has the same maximum fan-out lgn+1 as Snir's SN(n), but the depth of SL(n) is smaller; thus, SL(n) is faster. Compared with another optimal prefix circuit LYD(n), d(LYD(n))+2d(SL(n))d(LYD(n)). However, LYD(n) may have a fan-out of at most 2 lgn–2, and the fan-out of LYD(n) is greater than that of SL(n) for almost all n12. Because an operation node with greater fan-out occupies more chip area and is slower in VLSI implementation, in most cases, SL(n) needs less area and may be faster than LYD(n). Moreover, it is much easier to design SL(n) than LYD(n).     

More comments on the programming language Pascal

Summary A. N. Habermann recently published some Critical comments on the programming language Pascal. His reproaches are principally that numerous constructs are ill-defined, that there is confusion amongst ranges, types and structures, and that the goto statement should have been abolished. The present reply successively deals with points that are clearly refutable, those which are debatable and those which constitute valid criticism. Its principal aim is to encourage the reader to form his own opinion.     

Transformation of programs for fault-tolerance

In this paper we describe how a program constructed for afault-free system can be transformed into afault-tolerant program for execution on a system which is susceptible to failures. A program is described by a set of atomic actions which perform transformations from states to states. We assume that a fault environment is represented by a programF. Interference by the fault environmentF on the execution of a programP can then be described as afault-transformation which transformsP into a program (P). This is proved to be equivalent to the programPP _F , whereP _F is derived fromP andF, and defines the union of the sets of actions ofP andF _P . A recovery transformation transformsP into a program (P) =PR by adding a set ofrecovery actions R, called arecovery program. If the system isfailstop and faults do not affect recovery actions, we have ((P))=(P)R=PP _F R We illustrate this approach to fault-tolerant programming by considering the problem of designing a protocol that guarantees reliable communication from a sender to a receiver in spite of faults in the communication channel between them.     

How to Pass a Turing Test

I advocate a theory of syntactic semantics as a way of understanding how computers can think (and how the Chinese-Room-Argument objection to the Turing Test can be overcome): (1) Semantics, considered as the study of relations between symbols and meanings, can be turned into syntax – a study of relations among symbols (including meanings) – and hence syntax (i.e., symbol manipulation) can suffice for the semantical enterprise (contra Searle). (2) Semantics, considered as the process of understanding one domain (by modeling it) in terms of another, can be viewed recursively: The base case of semantic understanding –understanding a domain in terms of itself – is syntactic understanding. (3) An internal (or narrow), first-person point of view makes an external (or wide), third-person point of view otiose for purposes of understanding cognition.     

The “explicit-implicit” distinction

Much of traditional AI exemplifies the explicit representation paradigm, and during the late 1980's a heated debate arose between the classical and connectionist camps as to whether beliefs and rules receive an explicit or implicit representation in human cognition. In a recent paper, Kirsh (1990) questions the coherence of the fundamental distinction underlying this debate. He argues that our basic intuitions concerning explicit and implicit representations are not only confused but inconsistent. Ultimately, Kirsh proposes a new formulation of the distinction, based upon the criterion ofconstant time processing.The present paper examines Kirsh's claims. It is argued that Kirsh fails to demonstrate that our usage of explicit and implicit is seriously confused or inconsistent. Furthermore, it is argued that Kirsh's new formulation of the explicit-implicit distinction is excessively stringent, in that it banishes virtually all sentences of natural language from the realm of explicit representation. By contrast, the present paper proposes definitions for explicit and implicit which preserve most of our strong intuitions concerning straightforward uses of these terms. It is also argued that the distinction delineated here sustains the meaningfulness of the abovementioned debate between classicists and connectionists.     

A Stylometric Analysis of Ya?ar Kemal’s ? nce Memed Tetralogy

We analyze four nce Memed novels of Yaar Kemal using six style markers: most frequent words, syllable counts, word type – or part of speech – information, sentence length in terms of words, word length in text, and word length in vocabulary. For analysis we divide each novel into five thousand word text blocks and count the frequencies of each style marker in these blocks. The style markers showing the best separation are most frequent words and sentence lengths. We use stepwise discriminant analysis to determine the best discriminators of each style marker. We then use these markers in cross validation based discriminant analysis. Further investigation based on multiple analysis of variance (MANOVA) reveals how the attributes of each style marker group distinguish among the volumes.     

The impact of artificial intelligence on leisure

Two views of AI in leisure and the work-place and two views of society are discussed. There is a conceptualisation of AI systems enhancing people in their work and leisure and another of AI automata which tends to degrade and replace human activity. Researchers tend to resolve into Optimists who work within a micro-sociological view and see AI systems as inevitable and beneficent. Others are Pessimists who adopt a macro-sociological view and see AI in its automata role and deliterious social consequences. These polarised perspectives must be integrated as only enhancing AI is socially acceptable.