Development and evaluation of an improved soil test for phosphorus, 3: field comparison of Olsen, Colwell and Resin soil P tests for New Zealand pasture soils

Soil tests suitable for estimating the phosphorus (P) status of soils fertilised with soluble or sparingly soluble P fertilisers (reactive phosphate rock) were evaluated using the New Zealand Ministry of Agriculture Technology (NZMAFTech) National Series forms of phosphate trials on permanent pastures located throughout NZ. This included a common core of treatments comparing Sechura phosphate rock (SPR) with triple superphosphate (TSP). At each site, a re-application of twice maintenance TSP was superimposed on one-half plots that previously had received six annual applications of increasing amounts of P (0, 0.5, 0.75, 1.0 and 2.0 times the maintenance rate) in the form of TSP or SPR. Before the re-application of TSP, soil samples (0–30 and 0–75 mm depths) were collected from each plot. All the trials were run for 1 year during which seven to ten harvests were taken. Pasture response was expressed as percent increase in yield obtained with re-application over the previous treatment.The 0.5 NaHCO₃ based (Olsen P) extractant with different combinations i.e. soil volume (Olsen (v)), soil weight (Olsen (w)), shaking time variations (Olsen (16 h)) and soil:solution ratio (Colwell), and Resin P soil tests were conducted on soils taken from the plots prior to re-application of TSP. The Olsen (v), Olsen (16 h) and Colwell P values increased with increasing rates of P applied in all soils with values for sparingly soluble P materials being less than where soluble P fertiliser had been previously applied. The Resin P values showed similar increases with P applied regardless of the solubility of previously applied fertiliser. When the yield increases caused by TSP application to all treatments (irrespective of fertiliser source) were regressed against soil test values, Resin P explained 76% of the variation in yield response, compared to 50% by Olsen (v), 42% by Olsen (w), 39% by Olsen (16 h) and 40% by Colwell P. Partitioning the data according to fertiliser source slightly improved the coefficient of determination for Resin P for both the soluble (R²=0.81) and sparingly soluble (R²= 0.80) P fertilisers. With 0.5 M NaHCO₃ (Olsen) extractants, R² values consistently indicated a poorer prediction for the SPR treatments. A Resin P model was able to account for more variance in yield response to re-applied TSP, than an Olsen P model because the Olsen model underestimated the yield response to re-applied TSP on the PR treatments. The Resin test is more suitable than the current Olsen test for assessing the plant available P status of soils previously fertilised with fertilisers of varying solubility.Dr. A.G. Sinclair died on 3 December 1996 whilst this paper was in preparation.     

Development and evaluation of an improved soil test for phosphorus. 2. Comparison of the Olsen and mixed cation-anion exchange resin tests for predicting the yield of ryegrass grown in pots

A glasshouse experiment was conducted on four soils contrasting in P sorption capacity and exchangeable Ca content with perennial ryegrass using six phosphate rock (PR) sources and a soluble P source applied at four rates (including a control). After three harvests (11 weeks) replicate pots of each treatment were destructively sampled and Olsen P and mixed cation-anion exchange resin (Resin P) extractions carried out. The remaining replicated treatments were harvested another seven times (during 41 weeks). Yields (for the last seven harvests) were expressed as percentages of the maximum yield attainable with MCP.In general, the Resin P test extracted more than twice as much P as the Olsen test. There was a significant increase in Resin P with an increase in the amount of each P source in all four soils, but Olsen P values were not significantly different for soils treated with different rates of each phosphate rock. The abilities of the Olsen and mixed resin soil P tests to predict the cumulative dry matter yield from 7 harvests and the relative yield of ryegrass were compared. Correlations between measured yield (for the last 7 harvests) and soil test for each soil, and relative yield and soil test for all four soils were assessed by regression analysis using Mitscherlich-type models.When dry matter yields were regressed separately against soil test values for each soil, the Resin P consistently accounted for 18–28% more of the variation in yield than did Olsen P. For Resin P a single function was not significantly different from the separate functions fitted to MCP and PR treatments. However, for Olsen P the separate functions for the MCP and PR treatments varied significantly from the single fitted function. The Resin P test (R² = 0.84) was a better predictor of relative yields over this range of soils than the Olsen test (R² = 0.75). Two regression models based on the regression of relative yield for MCP treatments against either Olsen or Resin were developed. These models were then fitted to the relative yield data on soils fertilized with PRs only. The Olsen P model was found to be a poorer predictor (R² = 0.41) than the Resin P model (R² = 0.73) because it underestimated the observed yield of the PR treatments.     

An assessment of soil tests for phosphate for the prediction of cereal yields on a sandy soil in Western Australia

Nine soil tests for phosphate were evaluated for predicting the yield and P content of wheat, barley and oats grown on a sandy soil in Western Australia: Olsen, modified Olsen 1 (soil:solution ratio 1:5), modified Olsen 2 (soil:solution ratio 1:50), Colwell, Bray 1, Bray 2, modified Bray 2T (shaking time 10 minutes), modified Bray 2C (pH 3.7) and lactate. The soil had been fertilized 5 years previously with 20 levels each of superphosphate (OSP, range 0 to 400 kg P ha^–1) and Queensland rock phosphate (QRP, range 0 to 20 000 kg P ha^–1). For each species and fertilizer taken separately, all the tests, except for lactate, gave a good prediction of yield. When data for OSP and QRP were pooled, Bray 2 and modified Bray 2T tests were unsatisfactory predictors of both yield and P content.A linear relationship (P < 0.05) between mean soil tests value () and the standard deviation ( ) of the test value was observed for each soil test. For QRP, the results for lactate were the most variable (i.e./ was greatest) followed by modified Olsen 2 > Bray 1 > Bray 2 > Olsen > modified Bray 2C > modified Olsen 1 > modified Bray 2T > Colwell. The order for OSP fertilized soil was Bray 1 > modified Bray 2T > Bray 2 > Olsen > Colwell > modified Bray 2C > modified Olsen 1 > lactate > modified Olsen 2. For combined OSP and QRP data, the results of the Olsen 1 and Colwell extractions were the least variable.Errors in the prediction of yield ( _Y ) for all crops resulting from an error in soil test values () were calculated. For OSP-fertilized soil variability in values for the Bray-1 test provided the highest error (about 16%) in the prediction of the yield, followed by Bray 2 (12%) > Bray 2T (10%) > Olsen (8%) > Colwell (7%) > modified Bray 2C (6%) > lactate (4%). Maximum error was at yields of about 65% of maximum yield. For soil fertilized with QRP, lactate provided the highest error (about 10%) in the prediction of yield, followed by the other tests (< 6%). Maximum error was at yields of about 35% of maximum yield.The Colwell soil test gave the most accurate overall prediction of yield for both fertilizers.     

Evaluation of soil phosphate status where phosphate rock based fertilizers have been used

Soil phosphorus (P) tests have usually been calibrated using regression relationships between test values and crop yields for soils with a history of soluble P fertilizer use. However, the regression relationships have frequently been found to be different where phosphate rock (PR) based fertilizers have been used. Consequently, the traditional soil P tests often give incorrect estimates of soil P status of PR fertilized soils where calibrations were derived using soils treated with soluble P fertilizers. Alkaline soil tests (e.g., Olsen, Colwell) usually underestimate, while acid tests (e.g., Truog, Bray 2) usually overestimate, the soil P status of PR fertilized soils where normal calibrations are used. Several ways of overcoming this problem are discussed. Separate calibrations can be used for soluble and PR based fertilizers. In practice, this could involve mathematical modification of test values obtained with PR fertilized soils to enable use of the normal calibrations. Soil and fertilizer P models are available which use fertilizer history to derive current fertilizer recommendations and/or predict consequences of different fertilizer strategies. These could be extended to include functions describing the dissolution of PR in soil. This requires more detailed information on PR dissolution rates in different soils. Two soil tests for use with both soluble P and PR fertilized soils have recently been developed. They are the iron-oxide impregnated paper and the mixed anion exchange membrane/cation exchange membrane tests. While more evaluation is required in field situations, evidence to date indicates that both tests show promise.     

The residual value of superphosphate and rock phosphates for lateritic soils and its evaluation using three soil phosphate tests

The residual value of superphosphate and several rock phosphates was measured in three field experiments in Western Australia. The rock phosphates were Christmas Island C-grade ore, calcined C-grade ore (Calciphos) and apatite rock phosphates. The predictive capacity of the Colwell, Olsen and Bray 1 soil tests for phosphate were also evaluated.As measured by yields of variously wheat, oats, barley or clover, the effectiveness of an initial application of superphosphate decreased to about 50% of that of newly applied superphosphate between years 1 and 2, and further decreased to about 20% over subsequent years. At low levels of application, all the rock phosphates were between 10–20% as effective as superphosphate in the year of application for all experiments. Relative to newly applied superphosphate their effectiveness remained approximately constant in subsequent years for two experiments and doubled for the other experiment.The Colwell soil test predicted that the effectiveness of superphosphate decreased to about 45% between years 2 and 3, followed by a more gradual decrease to approximately 15%. At low levels of application, the effectiveness of the rock phosphates as predicted by the Colwell soil test values was initially very low relative to superphosphate (2–30%), and remained low in subsequent years (2–20%). For superphosphate treated soil, the proportion of the added phosphorus extracted generally increased as the level of application increased. By contrast, for rock phosphate treated soil, the proportion of added phosphorus extracted decreased as the level of application increased.For all three experiments there were highly significant positive correlations between amounts of P extracted by the three soil tests. Consequently all soil tests were equally predictive of yield but usually for each soil test separate calibrations between yield and soil test values were required for the different fertilizers and for each combination of fertilizer and plant species and for each year.     

Effect of fertilizer type,sampling depth,and years on Colwell soil test phosphorus for phosphorus leaching soils

The relationships between (i) soil test phosphorus (P) (Colwell sodium bicarbonate procedure) and the level of P applied (from 0 to 1000 kg total P ha^–1) (relationship 1), and (ii) yield and soil-test P (relationship 2, the soil P test calibration), were measured in two field experiments on very sandy, P-leaching soils in the high rainfall (> 800 mm annual average) areas of south-western Australia. The soils were humic sandy podzols, or haplohumods, comprising 97% sand (20 to 2000 m). The experiments started in April 1984 and were terminated at the end of 1990. Soil-test P, measured on soil samples collected to 5, 10 and 25 cm depth each January in the years after P application, was related to yields of dried clover (Trifolium subterraneum) herbage measured later in each year. The four P fertilizers studied were single superphosphate, coastal superphosphate (made by adding, just before granulation, extra rock phosphate together with elemental sulphur while manufacturing single superphosphate), apatite rock phosphate, and Calciphos.Relationship (1) was adequately described by a linear equation (R² > 0.80, most being > 0.90). The slope coefficient estimates the extractability of P from the soil by the Colwell procedure, and is called extractability. Relationship (2) was adequately described by the Mitscherlich equation (R² > 0.75, most being > 0.90). For relationship (2), use of percentage of the maximum (relative) yield eliminated differences due to different maximum yields and yield responses (maximum yield minus the yield for the nil-P treatment). Soil test P ranged from about 4 to 150 g Pg^–1 soil. Soil test P and extractability were generally higher for samples of the top 5 cm of the soil than the top 25 cm, and were largest for single superphosphate and lowest for apatite rock phosphate. Both extractability (relationship (1)) and the curvature coefficient of the Mitscherlich equation (relationship (2)), differed for different P fertilizers and different soil sample depths. The curvature coefficient also differed for different yield assessments (harvests) in the same or different years. Different soil P test calibrations were required for different P fertilizers, soil sample depths and harvest in the same or different years. It is concluded that soil P testing provides a crude estimate of the current P status of P-leaching soils in Western Australia.     

Summary of research on soil testing for rock phosphate fertilizers in Western Australia

The relationship between plant yield and values of soils tests for phosphorus (P) was studied in long-term field experiments in south-western Australia for soil previously fertilized with rock phosphate and superphosphate. The rock phosphates studied were: Queensland (Duchess) apatite rock phosphate; reactive apatite rock phosphate from North Carolina; and rock phosphate from Christmas Island (as either C-grade ore or Calciphos). The P fertilizers were applied once only at the start of each experiment, and in subsequent years, soil samples were collected in January-March to measure soil test values. These were compared with plant yields measured later on in that year. The Colwell alkaline bicarbonate soil test was used in all years in all experiments. Olsen, Bray, lactate and Troug tests were used in some years in some experiments. For all soil tests the relationships between yield and soil test values was generally different for rock phosphate and superphosphate. For a given source of P, none of the different soil test reagents was significantly superior for predicting plant yields. The relationship between yield and soil test value was also generally different for different plant species. At one site cultivation was included as a treatment and the relationship varied depending on the cultivation treatment of the topsoil before sowing oats (Avena sativa). The relationship between yield and soil test also differed between years.     

Dissolution of phosphorus from animal bone char in 12 soils

Heat-treated animal bone char (ABC) has not previously been evaluated for its potential as a phosphorus (P) fertilizer. ABC, Gafsa phosphate rock (GPR) and triple superphosphate fertilizer (TSP) were incubated in 12 soils. Dissolved-P was assessed by extraction with NaOH and bioavailability with the Olsen extractant. The rate of P dissolution from ABC was described almost equally well by the Elovich and Power equations. After 145 days, the fraction of P dissolved ranged from 0 to 73% and to 56% for ABC and GPR, respectively. The most important soil properties determining P dissolution from ABC were pH and P sorption. P dissolution was not significant at soil pH >6.1 (ABC) and >5 (GPR) and the lower the pH, the greater the Dissolved-P. Dissolved-P also correlated positively and significantly with inorganic P sorption, measured by the Freundlich isotherm and the P sorption index of Bache and Williams (1971). Soil pH and P sorption index could be combined in multiple regression equations that use readily measured soil properties to predict the potential for ABC dissolution in a soil. Dissolution of P from GPR correlated with soil pH and exchangeable acidity. In comparison with GPR, ABC was a better source of available P, assessed by Olsen-P. In most soils, ABC increased Olsen-P immediately after application, including soils of relatively high pH in which GPR was ineffective. ABC is a P fertilizer of solubility intermediate between GPR and TSP.     

A comparison of five soil phosphorus tests for five crop species for soil previously fertilized with superphosphate and rock phosphate

The P_i, Colwell, Bray 1, calcium acetate lactate (CAL) and Truog phosphorus (P) soil test reagents were assessed in two field experiments on lateritic soils in Western Australia that had been fertilized four years previously (1984) with triple superphosphate, North Carolina rock phosphate, Queensland rock phosphate, and in one experiment, Calciphos. Soil samples to measure soil P test were collected February 1987. Soil P test was related to seed (grain) yields measured later in 1987. Different crop species were grown on different sections of the same plot at each site. The species were lupins (Lupinus angustifolius), barley (Hordeum vulgare) and oats (Avena sativa) at one site, and lupins, oats, triticale (×Triticosecale) and rapeseed (Brassica napus) at the other site. For each reagent, the soil P test calibration, which is the relationship between yield, expressed as a percentage of the maximum yield, and soil P test, generally differed for different plant species and for different fertilizer types. Variations in soil P test required to produce half the maximum yield of each species at each site was least for the CAL reagent followed by the Colwell reagent.     

A comparison of seven soil P tests for plant species with different external P requirements grown on soils containing rock phosphate and superphosphate residues

Seven soil tests for phosphate (P) (Bray 1, Bray 2, Truog, ammonium oxalate, Colwell, iron oxide-strip (Pi) and resin-strip soil tests) were evaluated for predicting the yield of plant species which have very different external P requirements. Two acid, sandy soils that had been fertilized six years previously with superphosphate and three rock phosphates were used. A glasshouse pot experiment with lettuce, wheat and maize was used to calibrate the soil tests.For some soil P tests, different calibrations relating yield to soil P test values were required for each plant species, P fertilizer and soil combination. The Bray 2 and Truog soil P tests were the worst predictors of yield for both soils and all plant species. The Pi and ammonium oxalate tests were the most predictive tests for one soil when data for all fertilizers were considered. The Bray 1 and Colwell soil P tests were the most predictive for the other soil. The resin-strip P test was poorly predictive of yield of lettuce and wheat for both the soils. The accuracy in prediction of yield on the basis of P test value decreased in the sequence maize > wheat > lettuce. This rank is opposite to the increasing external P requirements of these species.     

A simplified resin membrane technique for extracting phosphorus from soils

A simplified procedure for determining the amount of phosphate (P) extracted from soils by ion exchange resin membranes is reported. Strips of anion (HCO ₃ ^- form) and cation (Na⁺ form) exchange membrane were shaken with suspensions of soil in deionised water for 16–17 hours. After shaking, the strips were thoroughly rinsed in deionised water before the phosphate retained on the anion exchange resin strip was determined by shaking the strip directly with phosphate reagent. Compared to the common use of resin beads in nylon mesh bags, this resin membrane procedure is simpler, more convenient, and because an elution step is omitted, less time consuming.The mixed resin membrane method for soil phosphate extraction was compared to the use of resin bags on four New Zealand soils, contrasting in P sorbing capacity and exchangeable calcium. The soils were preincubated with and without 240 mg P kg^–1 soil with three P sources of different solubilities. The resin strips extracted amounts of P which were closely correlated (R² = 0.972) with that extracted by the resin bags. The amounts of P extracted by the mixed resin procedure were in proportion to the solubility of the P sources in each soil.     

Phosphate availability in calcareous Vertisols and Inceptisols in relation to fertilizer type and soil properties

The availability to plants of fertilizer phosphorus (P) applied to soil, as measured by chemical extraction, is used to estimate P fertilizer needs. We studied the availability of P, applied as monocalcium phosphate (MCP) powder, ordinary superphosphate (OSP) granules and diammonium phosphate (DAP) granules in 24 calcareous Vertisols and Inceptisols of Andalusia, Spain, by using laboratory incubation techniques. The soils differed widely in their P adsorption- and Ca-phosphate precipitation-related properties. For MCP, availability (defined as the proportion of added P that is recovered by extraction with NaHCO₃ or is isotopically exchangeable) decreased markedly with incubation time and increasing addition rate. The mean recoveries after 180 d of incubation at field capacity at a rate of 246 mg P kg^–1 soil were 17% for Olsen P, 38% for Colwell P, and 16% for isotopically exchangeable P (IEP). Increasing the application rate to 2460 mg kg^–1 resulted in recoveries of 6% for Olsen P, 25% for Colwell P, and 4% for IEP. While IEP-based recovery was not significantly correlated to any soil property, that based on Olsen P (and, to a lesser extent, Colwell P) decreased sharply with increase in the ratio of clay (or Fe oxides) to total (or active) calcium carbonate equivalent. Accordingly, Olsen P might overestimate P availability in those soils relatively rich in carbonate and poor in clay and Fe oxides. On the other hand, recovery of applied P from soils containing more clay and Fe oxides, by a sequential extraction (with H₂O, two 0.5M NaHCO₃ treatments, 0.5M HCl), was lower than 100%, thereby suggesting phosphate occlusion by Fe oxides or clay.Availability of the fertilizers tested 90 d after application was found to decrease in the following order: MCP powder (rate, 246 mg kg^–1) > DAP granules (rate, 547 mg kg^–1) > MCP powder (rate, 738 mg kg^–1) > OSP granules (rate, 308 mg kg^–1). Differences between fertilizers tended to increase with increasing carbonate content in the soil. This may have been due to precipitation of Ca phosphates caused by the presence of Ca in the fertilizer and the high Ca- supplying capacity of the more calcareous soils.     

Comparison of single and coastal superphosphate for subterranean clover on phosphorus leaching soils

Coastal superphosphate, a partially acidulated rock phosphate (PARP), is being considered as an alternative fertilizer to single superphosphate for pastures in high rainfall (> 800 mm annual average) areas of south-western Australia. The effectiveness of single and coastal superphosphate, as P fertilizers, was measured in two field experiments using dry herbage yield of subterranean clover (Trifolium subterraneum). The experiments were started in April 1990 and were terminated at the end of 1993. In the years after P applications, soil samples were collected each January to measure Colwell soil-test P, which was related to plant yields measured later on that year, to provide soil P test calibrations.Relative to freshly-applied single superphosphate, the effectiveness of freshly-applied coastal superphosphate and the residues of previously-applied single and coastal superphosphate were less effective in some years (from 3% as effective to equally effective), and up to 100% more effective in other years. This large range in effectiveness values in different years is attributed to different climatic conditions. Soil P test calibrations were different for soils treated with single or coastal superphosphate. The calibrations were also different for different yield assessments (harvests) in the same year, and in different years. Consequently soil P testing can only provide a very crude estimate of the current P status of the soils.     

Phosphorus sorption in relation to soil properties in some cultivated Swedish soils

Phosphorus (P) sorption properties are poorly documented for Swedish soils. In this study, P sorption capacity and its relation to soil properties were determined and evaluated in 10 representative Swedish topsoils depleted in available P. P sorption indices were estimated from sorption isotherms using Langmuir and Freundlich equations (X_m and a_F, respectively) and P buffering capacity (PBC). X_m ranged from 6.0 to 12.2 mmol kg^–1. All indices obtained from sorption isotherms were significantly correlated with each other (r=0.96^*** to r=0.99^***). Two single-point sorption indices (PSI₁ and PSI₂) were also determined, with additions of 19.4 and 50 mmol P kg^–1 soil, respectively. Both PSI indices were well correlated with X_m (r0.98^***), with PSI₁ giving the highest correlation. As isotherms for determining P sorption capacities involve laborious analytical operations, PSI₁ would be preferable for routine analyses. X_m was significantly correlated with Fe extracted by sodium pyrophosphate and ammonium oxalate, to Al extracted by ammonium oxalate and dithionite-citrate-bicarbonate and to organic c. X_m was also significantly correlated with the sum of Fe and Al extracted by ammonium oxalate. The best prediction of X_m through multiple regression was obtained when Fe extracted in ammonium oxalate and Al extracted in dithionite-citrate-bicarbonate were used. Based on the results obtained, both PSI₁ and oxalate-extractable Fe plus Al can be used for predicting P sorption capacity in Swedish soils.     

European soils overfertilized with phosphorus: Part 1. Basic properties

Soils overfertilized with phosphorus (P) are widespread in the European Union and there is consensus among soil scientists to better explore their potential to release phosphate. In this work we report the principal physical and chemical properties of twelve overfertilized benchmark soils of contrasting agricultural areas in Italy, Germany, Great Britain, and Spain. The criterion used to consider them as overfertilized was that the available P amount, measured by the regional soil P test, was at least twice as large as the accepted critical level for an average crop. The soils could be usefully divided into three groups, calcareous, slightly acidic and acidic based upon their basic chemical properties and reactions and proportion of the major P fractions (NaOH- plus citrate-bicarbonate-, citrate-bicarbonate-dithionite-, and HCl-extractable P). Six extraction procedures commonly used to evaluate potentially plant-available P (Olsen, anion-exchange resin (resin-), anion plus cation-exchange resin (resin±), Ca acetatelactate (CAL), water, and Fe oxide-impregnated paper strips (strip) were compared. The extractable P values by each method were correlated but the amount of P extracted varied and differed in the order water-P< Olsen-P< CAL-P< strip-P< resin(±)-P相似文献   

Comparison of Olsen and Pi soil tests for evaluating phosphorus bioavailability in a calcareous soil treated with single superphosphate and partially acidulated phosphate rock

The Pi test for phosphorus (P) is a new method in which strips of iron oxide impregnated filter paper are used as a sink to sorb and extract P from a soil solution. In a greenhouse experiment, the Olsen and Pi tests were compared for their effectiveness in evaluating P availability to maize on calcareous soils. Phosphate rock from Togo, partially acidulated with H₂SO₄ at 50% acidulation level (PAPR 50% H₂SO₄) and single superphosphate (SSP) were applied at different rates to a calcareous soil (Vernon Clay, pH 8.2, CaCO₃ 18.9%) which was preincubated with KH₂PO₄ to raise plant-available P to different levels. In soils treated with SSP, dry-matter yield of maize correlated equally well with Pi-P and with Olsen-P (r = 0.96^***). P uptake correlated significantly with P_i-P (r = 0.94^***) as well as Olsen-P (r = 0.97^***). Likewise, in soils fertilized with PAPR, significant correlations were found between dry-matter yield and Pi-P (r = 0.97^***) and between dry-matter yield and Olsen-P (r = 0.94^***). When all the data were pooled, Pi-P and Olsen-P correlated equally well with both dry-matter weight (r = 0.97^***) and P uptake (r = 0.94^***). Phosphorus extracted by the Pi test correlated significantly with P extracted by the Olsen test (r = 0.99^***).     

Comparison of the Pi,Colwell, Bray 1, calcium acetate lactate (CAL) and Truog soil phosphorus test for predicting growth of oats,barley, triticale and clover in the field in lateritic soils fertilised with superphosphate and rock phosphate

The P_i soil test for phosphorus (P), which uses an iron oxide impregnated paper, was evaluated in three field experiment on lateritic soils in south-western Australia fertilised with triple superphosphate, North Carolina rock phosphate, Queensland rock phosphate, and in one experiment, Calciphos. Soil samples were collected February to March from 1985 to 1988. The P_i, Colwell, Bray 1, calcium acetate lactate (CAL) and Truog soil P tests were used. Soil test P values were related to yields of triticale (×Triticosecale) or oats (Avena sativa), barley (Hordeum vulgare) or dry herbage yields of subterranean clover (Trifolium subterraneum). The Colwell soil test, which is commonly used in Australia, and the Pi soil test were almost equally predictive, but showed considerable error in prediction of yield. For each soil test and plant species the relationship between yield and soil test P differed with fertilizer type and year. For combined data for all sites, fertilizers and years, the CAL soil test was the most predictive and the Truog soil test was least predictive of plant yield.     

Phosphorus effectiveness in fertilized soils evaluated by chemical solutions and residual value for wheat growth

Nineteen soils from the south east of the Province of Buenos Aires (Argentina) that had been fertilized with moderate amounts of P (10–40 kgP/ha) during the last 10 years were used to investigate the effect of time on the decline of P availability as measured by three soil tests (Bray 1, Bray 2, Olsen) and the null-point method. Differences in rates of P decline among soils and chemical methods were characterized by an exponential coefficient for time (b ₂) in equations which describe the changes of the added P retained by the soil (Pr =ac ^b1 t ^b2). The rate of decline of P for the nineteen soils calculated for the soil test methods was ordered decreasingly as: null-point > Olsen > Bray 1 > Bray 2. The ability of the chemical methods for assessing the residual value of P for wheat growth (RV) was tested in a pot experiment on seven of the soils that differed in their individual rates of reaction with P. Differences between soils in the rate of reaction with P as measured in the laboratory by the null-point method and by the Olsen test were reflected in different residual values for P fertilizer for wheat plants. Thus the value ofb ₂ for these methods was well correlated with the observed residual values. The soil properties commonly associated with the retention of P were not related to the value ofb ₂ suggesting that more than one soil property may be involved in the measure ofb ₂. The exponent for timeb ₂ may be used as an index of the ability of the soil test to reflect the decline of P availability with time.     

Comparison of resin beads and resin membranes for extracting soil phosphate

Six Portuguese soils of varying P sorption capacity were incubated aerobically at 30° C without and with added P in order to give 0.1.mg P L^–1 in the soil solution. Two methods of measuring extractable P were compared: (i) mixed-bed cation-anion-resin beads in bags and (ii) a simpler method with anion-resin membrane only. The bag method extracted about twice and 1.5 times as much as the strip method, respectively, without and with added P. The relationships were much closer after one extraction for 2 hours (r = 0.982, p < 0.01) instead of the cumulative extraction of 24 hours (r = 0.635,p > 0.05.). P recovery after incubation was inversely related to some soil properties as organic matter, buffer capacity, selective dissolution Al forms (Al_ox and Al_d) and P sorption. It is suggested that the simpler resin membrane method is more adequate to assess P for many studies of P reaction with soil. A simpler incubation method was tried, consisting of incubation as a soil suspension in water at a high temperature (50° C). The results suggested that this method gave similar results to aerobic incubation, with the advantage that there was no need to measure the required and final water contents of incubated soil.     

Soil testing for available phosphorus in soils where phosphate rock-based fertilizers are used

Traditional soil tests for phosphorus (P) were developed to arrive at fertilizer recommendations when water-soluble P fertilizers have been used. When slowly water-soluble fertilizers such as phosphate rock (PR) have been used, soil tests using acidic extractants overestimate bioavailability of P, whereas alkaline extractants underestimate it. Therefore, separate calibration curves are needed for soluble and PR-based fertilizers. There are two soil tests that show promise as suitable tests in soils fertilized with soluble as well as PR-based fertilizers. These are the iron oxide impregnated paper (P _i ) test and the ion exchange resin paper test. In both cases, the strips act as a sink for P mobilized in a soil solution, and P measured depends only on the concentration of P mobilized in the solution and not on the source of P or properties of the soil. Both tests somewhat simulate the sorption of P by plant roots without disturbing the chemical equilibrium, unlike other tests that extract P by the destructive dissolution of specific soil P compounds. In both cases, P measured from soils fertilized with PR-based fertilizers has shown very good correlation with plant response. Field calibration with crops under different pedological and agroecological regimes is needed for using these soil tests in developing fertilizer recommendations.