Structure and properties of polyamide 6 blends with low‐density polyethylene grafted by itaconic acid and with neutralized carboxyl groups

A comparative study of the structure and properties of two‐phase blends of polyamide 6 (PA6) and low‐density polyethylene (LDPE) modified in the course of reactive extrusion, by grafting of itaconic acid (IA) without neutralization of carboxyl groups (LDPE‐g‐IA) and with neutralized carboxyl groups (LDPE‐g‐IA^?M⁺) was carried out. It was shown that 30 wt % of LDPE‐g‐IA^?M⁺ introduced to PA6 resulted in blends of higher Charpy impact strength compared with that of PA6/LDPE‐g‐IA blends. The maximum increase was achieved when Mg(OH)₂ was used as a neutralizing agent. The blend morphology has a two‐phase structure with blurred interphases because of increased adhesion between the phases. The neutralization of carboxyl groups in grafted IA did not lead to two‐phase morphology of blends, which had a negative influence on the mechanical properties. It is believed that the differences in the impact strength were caused by the influence of the added neutralizing agents on the structure of interphases, which depends on both the interfaces adhesion and structural effects resulting from the nucleating behavior of the neutralizing agent. © 2004 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 92: 1702–1708, 2004     

Structure and properties of polypropylene/low‐density polyethylene blends grafted with itaconic acid in the course of reactive extrusion

This study was concerned with the structural features and mechanical properties of polypropylene (PP)/low‐density polyethylene (LDPE) blends, which after compounding were modified by the free‐radical grafting of itaconic acid (IA) to produce [PP/LDPE]‐g‐IA in the course of reactive extrusion. To analyze the structural features of the [PP/LDPE]‐g‐IA systems, differential scanning calorimetry and relaxation spectrometry techniques were used. The data were indicative of the incompatibility of PP and LDPE in the [PP/LDPE]‐g‐IA systems on the level of crystalline phases; however, favorable interactions were observed within the amorphous phases of the polymers. Because of these interactions, the crystallization temperature of PP increased by 5–11°C, and that of LDPE increased by 1.3–2.7°C. The rapprochement of their glass‐transition temperatures was observed. The single β‐relaxation peak for the [PP/LDPE]‐g‐IA systems showed that compatibility on the level of structural units was responsible for β relaxation in the homopolymers used. Variations in the ratios of the polymers in the [PP/LDPE]‐g‐IA systems led to both nonadditive and complex changes in the viscoelastic properties as well as mechanical characteristics for the composites. Additions of up to 5 wt % PP strengthened the [PP/LDPE]‐g‐IA blended systems between the glass‐transition temperatures of LDPE and PP. © 2006 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 102: 1746–1754, 2006     

X‐ray irradiated LDPE/PP blends with high mechanical and dielectric performance

In this study, the influences of polypropylene (PP) additive (varying from 20% to 80% wt) and low dose X‐ray irradiation (changing from 25 to 100 Gy) on the mechanical and dielectric properties of low‐density polyethylene (LDPE) were investigated. LDPE/PP film blends were prepared by hot press technique. While the highest Young modulus and tensile strength were observed for the 20%LDPE/80%PP blend at 25 Gy X‐ray irradiation, the same blend had the highest energy at break and percentage strain at break values for 50 Gy X‐ray exposure. These results also indicated a chain scission in the material. The differential scanning calorimetry curves also indicated a chain scission and crosslinking effects in the blends due to X‐ray irradiation. Hence, the higher concentration of PP additive and exposure of low dose X‐ray resulted in a polymer composite with high mechanical performance. On the other hand, the dielectric investigations revealed that the 25 Gy X‐ray irradiated 20%LDPE/80%PP blend may also attract attention for capacitor applications due to its increased static dielectric constant and reduced dielectric loss. © 2018 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2018 , 135, 46571.     

PET/PP blending by using PP‐g‐MA synthesized by solid phase

In attempts to improve the compatibility of polypropylene (PP) with polyethylene terephthalate (PET), a maleic anhydride grafted PP (PP‐g‐MA) was evaluated as a compatibilizer in a blend of 30/70 wt % PP/PET. PP‐g‐MA was produced from isotactic homopolymer PP utilizing the technique of solid phase graft copolymerization. Qualitative confirmations of the grafting were made by Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR). Three different weight percent of compatibilizer, PP‐g‐MA, i.e., 5, 10, and 15 wt % have been used in PP/PET blends. The compatibilizing efficiency for PP/PET blend was examined using differential scanning calorimetry (DSC), optical microscopy (OM), scanning electron microscopy (SEM) of crycrofractured surfaces, and energy dispersive X‐ray spectrum (EDAX). The results show that the grafted PP promotes a fine dispersed phase morphology, improves processability, and modifies the crystallization behavior of the polyester component. These effects are attributed to enhance phase interaction resulting in reduced interfacial tension. Also, the results show that the compatibilizing effects of the three amounts of grafted PP in blend are different and dependent on the amount used. Adding 10 wt % of compatibilizer into blend produced the finest dispersed morphology. Elemental analysis results show that PP is matrix. DSC determination revealed that the melting temperature (T_m) of the PET component declined to some extent by comparison with neat PET. © 2007 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 104, 3986–3993, 2007     

Free radical grafting of itaconic acid and glycidyl methacrylate onto PP initiated by organic peroxides

Comparative analysis was conducted to learn the grafting of itaconic acid (IA) and glycidyl methacrylate (GMA) onto polypropylene (PP) in the course of reactive extrusion. Seven organic peroxides, which satisfactorily dissolve in PP, but do not dissolve in the monomer, were used to initiate free‐radical reactions. The grafting of IA and GMA onto PP initiated by certain peroxides gave approximately equal amounts of grafted product. It was learned that the nature of peroxide initiators is decisive for grafting efficiency and degree of macromolecular degradation. To ensure a high yield of grafted product, it is advisable to use peroxides, which have thermodynamic affinity with PP and the temperature range of decomposition of which corresponds to the thermal regime of reactive extrusion. Di(tert‐butyl peroxy‐isopropyl)‐benzene (P‐14) appeared to meet for the most these requirements for grafting both GMA and IA. Grafting is accompanied by β‐decomposition of the chains irrespective of the type of peroxide and monomer used; hence, the MFI increases. A considerable rise in MFI was observed at a minimum peroxide concentration (0.1wt %). Degradation of PP during modification eases its crystallization from the melt. In this case the crystallization temperature is 5 to 8.5°C higher than of the original PP, and the crystallinity degree increases by 20 to 60%. © 2002 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 86: 64–72, 2002     

Investigation of molecular structure of LDPE modified by itaconic acid grafting

Using thermomechanical spectroscopy, the molecular‐weight distribution and relaxation transitions have been investigated in commercial LDPE and grafted by itaconic acid (LDPE‐g‐IA). This grafting in the molten LDPE was done by reactive extrusion with varied content of reactants in the blend under alternating of a shearing rate applied onto the melt. The dependence of structural relaxation changes in LDPE is shown upon the depth of the mechanochemical transformations and the competing reactions at IA grafting, and also on the chemical crosslinking of the macromolecules. The reason for MWD bimodality for LDPE‐g‐IA obtained in dynamic mixing is the raised homogenization degree of the reactive blend and the higher grafted product yield compared with static mixers. The mixer type substantially affects the structure of the LDPE‐g‐IA amorphous phase. The data obtained reflect chemical transformations of LDPE molecules in IA's presence without an initiator of radical reactions (DCP). Most probable is the IA initiation of molecular crosslinking reactions. There could also occur IA thermodegradation and oligomerization. LDPE and IA or products of acid chemical transformations do not agree thermodynamically (the calculated solubility parameters are 16.1 (MJ/m³)^0.5 for polyethylene and 26.4 (MJ/m³)^0.5 for IA). From the above procedure it can be supposed that nongrafted IA (or its oligomers) exerts an antiplastifying effect on LDPE and LDPE‐g‐IA. © 1999 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 71: 1771–1779, 1999     

Probing toughness of polycarbonate (PC: ductile and brittle)/polypropylene (PP) blends and talc-triggered PC/PP brittle composites with diverse impact fracture parameters

Polycarbonates (PCs) are commonly used as a blend and a composite to achieve pecuniary advantages and dimensional stability. While the toughness of a homogeneous PC matrix has been extensively investigated, examination for the toughness of heterogeneous blend systems such as PC/polypropylene (PP) blends has been limited. Furthermore, recent interest in highly flowable PCs (low-molecular-weight PCs with low ductility) has surfaced due to the large and geometrically complex plastic parts. Herein, the toughness for PC/PP blends and PC/PP/talc composites in a ductile and a brittle PC matrix was explored by using various toughness measurements such as notched Izod impact strength, falling dart impact, boss quasi-static energy/impact energy, and tensile toughness tests. In a ductile PC matrix [melt flow index (MFI) = 8], the incorporation of PP gradually reduced the toughness. On the other hand, the toughness was improved by 450% at 2 wt % PP in a brittle PC matrix (MFI = 19). Similarly, in the talc-induced brittle PC matrix, the toughness was enhanced at the PP loading from 2 to 10 wt %. The density of PC/PP blends was gradually reduced from 1.19 to 1.10 g cm⁻³ with increasing PP concentration from 0 to 20 wt %. Degradation, density, thermal behaviors, and morphology were also investigated. © 2018 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2019 , 136, 47110.     

Development of nanofibrous morphology in LDPE/LLDPE/PP blends and its effect on mechanical properties of blend films

Nanofibrous morphology has been observed in ternary blends of low density polyethylene (LDPE), linear low density polyethylene (LLDPE), and isotactic polypropylene (PP) when these were melt‐extruded via slit die followed by hot stretching. The morphology was dependent on the concentration of the component polymers in ternary blend LDPE/LLDPE/PP. The films were characterized by wide angle X‐ray diffraction (XRD), scanning electron microscopy (SEM), and testing of mechanical properties. The XRD patterns reveal that the β phase of PP is obtained in the as‐stretched nanofibrillar composites, whose concentration decreases with the increase of LLDPE concentration. The presence of PP nanofibrils shows significant nucleation ability for crystallization of LDPE/LLDPE blend. The SEM observations of etched samples show an isotropic blend of LDPE and LLDPE reinforced with more or less randomly distributed and well‐defined nanofibrils of PP, which were generated in situ. The tensile modulus and strength of LDPE/LLDPE/PP blends were significantly enhanced in the machine direction than in the transverse direction with increasing LLDPE concentration. The ultimate elongation increased with increasing LLDPE concentration, and there was a critical LLDPE concentration above which it increased considerably. There was a dramatic increase in the falling dart impact strength for films obtained by blow extrusion of these blends. These impressive mechanical properties of extruded samples can be explained on the basis of the formation of PP nanofibrils with high aspect ratio (at least 10), which imparted reinforcement to the LDPE/LLDPE blend. © 2007 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci, 2008     

Toughening and compatibilization of polypropylene/polyamide‐6 blends with a maleated–grafted ethylene‐co‐vinyl acetate

In this article, maleated–grafted ethylene‐co‐vinyl acetate (EVA‐g‐MA) was used as the interfacial modifier for polypropylene/polyamide‐6 (PP/PA6) blends, and effects of its concentration on the mechanical properties and the morphology of blends were investigated. It was found that the addition of EVA‐g‐MA improved the compatibility between PP and PA6 and resulted in a finer dispersion of dispersed PA6 phase. In comparison with uncompatibilized PP/PA6 blend, a significant reduction in the size of dispersed PA6 domain was observed. Toluene‐etched micrographs confirmed the formation of interfacial copolymers. Mechanical measurement revealed that the addition of EVA‐g‐MA markedly improved the impact toughness of PP/PA6 blend. Fractograph micrographs revealed that matrix shear yielding began to occur when EVA‐g‐MA concentration was increased upto 18 wt %. © 2006 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 99:3300–3307, 2006     

Preparation of polypropylene/acrylonitrile–styrene copolymer alloys by one‐step reactive blending

The compatibilization of polypropylene/acrylonitrile–styrene (PP/AS) blends through the addition of peroxide (DCP) was investigated in this study. The grafting reaction between PP and AS with the addition of peroxide occurred during the reactive‐blending process. The in situ‐formed grafting copolymers of PP‐g‐AS and AS‐g‐PP were then characterized by FTIR. The optimum concentration of the initiator, DCP, was 0.2 wt %, and the reaction temperature should be above 195°C. It was found that, when AS was the major component of the blends, the grafting of AS onto PP was the main process; conversely, when PP was the major component, PP was grafted onto AS. These results can be explained by the main‐chain scission of PP during the reactive‐blending process. With increase of the AS component, the total degree of grafting increased at first and then decreased after the composition of the blends reached 50/50. The maximum degree of grafting was found to be 6 wt % for the 50/50 PP/AS/DCP blend. PP was more degradable than was AS in the presence of peroxide at high temperatures. The MFR values of the PP/AS/DCP blends were slightly greater than were those of the simple PP/AS blends, which means that blending is an effective way to protect PP from degradation. SEM micrographs of the cross section of PP/AS/DCP showed a fine dispersion and a smaller domain size of the dispersed‐phase particles, implying that the in situ‐formed grafting copolymers act as a compatibilizer to reduce the interfacial tension between the PP and AS phases. © 2001 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 82: 1284–1290, 2001     

Novel multimonomer‐grafted polypropylene preparation and application in polypropylene/poly(vinyl chloride) blends

A novel grafted polymer was prepared in one step through free‐radical melt grafting in a single‐screw extruder. It was shown that the addition of styrene (St) to the melt‐grafting system as a comonomer could significantly enhance the grafting degree of methyl methacrylate (MMA) onto polypropylene (PP) and reduce the degradation of the PP matrix by means of Fourier transform infrared and melt flow rate testing, respectively. Then, the potential of using multimonomer‐grafted PP, which was designated PP‐g‐(St‐co‐MMA), as the compatibilizer in PP/poly(vinyl chloride) (PVC) blends was also examined. In comparison with PP/PVC blends, the average size of the dispersed phase was greatly reduced in grafted polypropylene (gPP)/PVC blends because of the addition of the PP‐g‐(St‐co‐MMA) graft copolymer. The tensile strength of the gPP/PVC blends increased significantly, and the impact strength was unchanged from that of the pure PP/PVC blends. The results of differential scanning calorimetry and scanning electron microscopy suggested that the compatibility of the PP/PVC blends was improved. © 2007 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci, 2008     

PETA熔融接枝PP/LDPE共混物的研究

研究了季戊四醇三丙烯酸酯熔融接枝PP／LDPE共混物体系中，各因素对产物熔体质量流动速率和熔体强度的影响，并对产物拉伸粘度和化学接枝情况等进行了测试及表征，实验结果表明，引发剂用量较低，单体用量较高时，产物的熔体质量流动速率小,熔体强度较高，拉伸粘度较大，且在拉伸过程中，产生了应变硬化效应；随着单体用量的增加，接枝率会有所上升。     

Reactive mixing of PET and PET/PP blends with glycidyl methacrylate–modified styrene‐b‐(ethylene‐co‐olefin) block copolymers

Styrene‐b‐(ethylene‐co‐butylene)‐b‐styrene (SEBS) and styrene‐b‐(ethylene‐co‐propylene) (SEP, SEPSEP) block copolymers with different styrene contents and different numbers of blocks in the copolymer chain were functionalized by melt radical grafting with glycidyl methacrylate (GMA) and employed as compatibilizers for PET‐based blends. Binary blends of PET with both functionalized (SEBS‐g‐GMA, SEP‐g‐GMA, SEPSEP‐g‐GMA) and neat (SEBS, SEP, SEPSEP) copolymers (75 : 25 w/w) and ternary blends of PET and PP (75 : 25 w/w) with various amounts (2.5–10 phr) of both modified and unmodified copolymers were prepared in an internal mixer, and their properties were evaluated by SEM, DSC, melt viscosimetry, and tensile and impact tests. The roles of the chemical structure, grafting degree, and concentration of the various copolymers on blend compatibilization was investigated. The blends with the grafted copolymers showed a neat improvement of phase dispersion and interfacial adhesion compared to the blends with nonfunctionalized copolymers. The addition of grafted copolymers resulted in a marked increase in melt viscosity, which was accounted for by the occurrence of chemical reactions between the epoxide groups of GMA and the carboxyl/hydroxyl end groups of PET during melt mixing. Blends with SEPSEP‐g‐GMA and SEBS‐g‐GMA, at concentrations of 5–10 phr, showed a higher compatibilizing effect with enhanced elongation at break and impact resistance. The effectiveness of GMA‐functionalized SEBS was then compared to that of maleic anhydride–grafted SEBS. © 2005 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 98: 2201–2211, 2005     

Mechanical properties and morphology of PP/ABS blends compatibilized with PP‐g‐2‐HEMA

Polypropylene (PP) and acrylonitrile–butadiene–styrene blends of different composition were prepared using a single‐screw extruder. The binary blend of PP/ABS was observed to be incompatible and shows poor mechanical properties. PP‐g‐2‐hydroxyethyl methacrylate (2‐HEMA) was used as a compatibilizer for the PP/ABS blends. The ternary compatibilized blends of PP/ABS/PP‐g‐2‐HEMA showed improvement in the mechanical properties. Electron micrographs of these blends showed a homogeneous and finer distribution of the dispersed phase. The mechanical performance increased particularly in the PP‐rich blend. The 2.5‐phr (part per hundred of resin) compatibilizer was observed to bring improvement to the properties. The suitability of various existing theoretical models for the predication of the tensile moduli of these blends was examined. © 2003 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 88: 72–78, 2003     

Morphology and rheological properties of compatibilized low‐density polyethylene/linear low‐density polyethylene/thermoplastic starch blends

Morphology and rheological properties of low‐density polyethylene/linear low‐density polyethylene/thermoplastic starch (LDPE/LLDPE/TPS) blends are experimentally investigated and theoretically analyzed using rheological models. Blending of LDPE/LLDPE (70/30 wt/wt) with 5–20 wt % of TPS and 3 wt % of PE‐grafted maleic anhydride (PE‐g‐MA) as a compatibilizer is performed in a twin‐screw extruder. Scanning electron micrographs show a fairly good dispersion of TPS in PE matrices in the presence of PE‐g‐MA. However, as the TPS content increases, the starch particle size increases. X‐ray diffraction patterns exhibit that with increase in TPS content, the intensity of the crystallization peaks slightly decreases and consequently crystal sizes of the blends decrease. The rheological analyses indicate that TPS can increase the elasticity and viscosity of the blends. With increasing the amount of TPS, starch particles interactions intensify and as a result the blend interface become weaker which are confirmed by relaxation time spectra and the prediction results of emulsion Palierne and Gramespacher‐Meissner models. It is demonstrated that there is a better agreement between experimental rheological data and Coran model than the emulsion models. © 2017 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2017 , 134, 44719.     

Morphological,thermal, rheological,and mechanical properties of PP/EVOH blends compatibilized with PP‐g‐IA

We prepared some blends of polypropylene (PP) and ethylene vinyl alcohol (EVOH) with and without a compatibilizer. As a new compatibilizer, we synthesized polypropylene grafted with itaconic acid (PP‐g‐IA) using Brabender mixing system. We investigated the morphological, thermal, rheological, and mechanical properties of a compatibilized blends (PP/EVOH/PP‐g‐IA) and not compatibilized blends (PP/EVOH). Our experiments showed that carboxylic acid groups in PP‐g‐IA and hydroxyl group in EVOH formed strong in situ hydrogen bond in the compatibilized blends, resulting in better morphological and mechanical properties of the compatibilized blends than those of not compatibilized blends. POLYM. ENG. SCI., 56:1240–1247, 2016. © 2016 Society of Plastics Engineers     

Polypropylene/polypropylene‐grafted acrylic acid copolymer/ethylene–Acrylic acid copolymer ternary blends for hydrophilic polypropylene

Ternary blends of polypropylene (PP), a polypropylene‐grafted acrylic acid copolymer (PP‐g‐AA), and an ethylene–acrylic acid copolymer (EAA) were prepared by melt blending. The surfaces of films with different contents of these three components were characterized with contact‐angle measurements. Scanning electron microscopy, Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy, differential scanning calorimetry, and thermogravimetric analysis were used to characterize the microstructure, melting and crystalline behavior, and thermal stability of the blends. The contact angles of the PP/PP‐g‐AA blends decreased monotonically with increasing PP‐g‐AA content. With the incorporation of EAA, the contact angles of the PP/PP‐g‐AA/EAA ternary blends decreased with increasing EAA content. When the concentration of EAA was higher than 15 wt %, the contact angles of the ternary blends began to increase. Scanning electron microscopy observations confirmed that PP‐g‐AA acted as a compatibilizer and improved the compatibility between PP and EAA in the ternary blends. Differential scanning calorimetry analysis suggested that acrylic acid moieties could act as nucleating agents for PP in the polymer blends. Thermogravimetric analysis and differential thermogravimetry confirmed the optimal blend ratio for the PP/PP‐g‐AA/EAA ternary blends was 70/15/15. © 2006 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 101: 436–442, 2006     

Polypropylene/polypropylene‐grafted acrylic acid blends for multilayer films: Preparation and characterization

Polypropylene (PP) was functionalized with acrylic acid (AA) and styrene (st) as a comonomer by means of a radical‐initiated melt‐grafting reaction. FTIR, ESCA, and ¹H‐NMR spectroscopies were used to characterize the formation of polypropylene grafted with acrylic acid (PP‐g‐AA) and polypropylene grafted with acrylic acid and styrene (PP‐g‐AAst). The content of AA grafted onto PP was determined by using volumetric titration. Blends of PP with 0–100 wt % of PP‐g‐AA were prepared by melt mixing. The effect of the modified polymer content on the surfaces of cast films was characterized through FTIR–ATR and ESCA analysis as well as contact‐angle, wetting‐tension, and ink‐adhesion measurements. The influence of the content of AA on the melting and crystallization temperature of PP was investigated by DSC. The contact angles of water on cast‐film surfaces of PP/PP‐g‐AA blends decreases with increasing modified polymer content and decreasing PP‐g‐AA molecular weight. A notorious improvement on wetting tension was observed with increasing modified polymer content and decreasing PP‐g‐AA molecular weight. From FTIR–ATR and ESCA spectra of the blends, a calculation was made of the carbonyl index on the films' surfaces. It was found that the higher the carbonyl index, the lower the contact‐angle value for the polypropylene blends. An increase in crystallization temperature of PP was observed when AA monomers were grafted into PP and with increasing PP‐g‐AA content in the blend, probably caused by a nucleation effect of AA monomers that would improve the crystallization capability of PP. © 2000 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 79: 1497–1505, 2001     

Grafting of itaconic acid onto LDPE by the reactive extrusion: Effect of neutralizing agents

Grafting of itaconic acid (IA) onto low‐density polyethylene (LDPE) was performed by reactive extrusion where the initiator was dicumyl peroxide, and the neutralizing agents (NAs) were zinc oxides and hydroxides as well as magnesium oxides and hydroxides. The carboxyl groups were neutralized in molten LDPE directly in the course of acid grafting, and in prefabricated functionalized polyethylene (LDPE‐g‐IA). It was found that neutralizing agents introduced into the initial reaction mixture increase the yield of LDPE‐g‐IA while the carboxyl groups were neutralized partially or totally through chemical reactions. The physical structure of LDPE‐g‐IA did not in fact suffer any substantial changes. From the standpoint of neutralization activity, the NAs studied could be arranged as follows: Zn(OH)₂ > ZnO > Mg(OH)₂ > MgO. NA, added into the initial reaction mixture improved the grafting efficiency of IA onto LDPE. In case of the one‐step process (neutralization simultaneously with grafting), the neutralizing effect appears stronger than that in the two‐step process (neutralization of prepared LDPE‐g‐IA). This means that neutralization of carboxyl groups in IA was less effective when NA was introduced into LDPE‐g‐IA than for the case of the initial reactive mixture. Chemical neutralization of grafted IA results in products of improved resistance to thermal oxidation and thermal stability of melt. This result is of practical importance to the opportunities for widening the application range for PE modified by grafting IA, while preparing polymer blends to be compounded, processed, and used at elevated temperatures. © 2003 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 89: 828–836, 2003     

Compatibilizing Effect of SEBS for Electrical Properties of LDPE/PS Blends

Summary: In the previous study, we observed compatibilizing effects of low density polyethylene (LDPE)/polystyrene (PS) with polystyrene‐block‐poly(ethylene‐co‐butylene)‐block‐polystyrene (SEBS), a triblock copolymer. Blends consisting of 70 wt.‐% LDPE and 30 wt.‐% PS were prepared with a SEBS concentration of up to 10 wt.‐%. This study examined the electrical properties such as the electrical breakdown, water tree length, permittivity and tan δ in the blends. The possibility of using these blends as insulating material substitutes for LDPE was investigated. The electrical breakdown strength reached a maximum of 66.67 kV/mm, which is superior to 50.27 kV/mm of the LDPE used as electrical insulators for cables. In addition, the water tree length decreased with increasing SEBS concentration. The water tree lengths of the blends containing SEBS were shorter than that of the LDPE. The permittivity of the blends was 2.28–2.48 F/m, and decreased with increasing SEBS concentration with the exception of S‐0. Tan δ of the blends increased smoothly with increasing SEBS content.

Breakdown strength , water tree length, permittivity and tan δ of the LDPE/PS/SEBS blends and raw materials.