基于差分算法的反渗透海水淡化优化调度

以系统运行费用为目标的反渗透海水淡化优化调度是一类带有约束的非线性优化问题。针对这一问题,提出一种改进的差分进化算法。该算法对基本差分进化算法中的变异因子和交叉因子进行改进;定义约束违反度函数,将约束优化问题转化为无约束的优化问题。以24小时为一个周期,通过改进的差分进化算法对系统模型进行优化调度。仿真结果表明,改进的算法可以对机组进行优化操作,有效的降低了系统的生产成本。     

PSO混合DE算法求解约束优化问题

提出了一个全新的混合算法并命名为微粒群差分算法,该算法在标准微粒群算法的基础上结合了差分进化算法用于求解约束的数值和工程优化问题。传统的标准微粒群算法由于其种群单一性容易陷入局部最优值,针对这一缺点利用差分进化算法中的变异、交叉、选择3个算子来更新每次迭代每个粒子新生产的位置以使粒子跳出局部优值。融合了标准微粒群算法和差分进化算法优点的混合算法加速了粒子的收敛速度。为了避免惩罚因子的选择对实验结果的影响,采取了可行规则法来处理约束优化问题。最后将微粒群差分算法用于5个基准函数和两个工程问题,并与其他算法作了比较,试验结果表明,微粒群差分算法算法具有很好的精准性、鲁棒性和有效性。     

基于Oracle罚函数的自适应约束差分进化算法

为有效求解约束优化问题,减少算法参数,提出基于Oracle罚函数方法的自适应约束差分进化算法。为满足求解优化问题的常用标准,提出一种改进的Oracle罚函数方法。将改进的Oracle罚函数方法与三种自适应差分进化算法相结合,提出三种自适应约束差分进化算法。对11个典型测试函数的优化结果验证了Oracle罚函数方法与自适应差分进化算法结合的有效性。与参考文献中提出的算法的比较结果表明该方法具有良好的寻优性能,因此基于Oracle罚函数方法的自适应约束差分进化算法是一种有效约束优化方法。     

基于混沌和差分进化的混合粒子群优化算法

研究粒子群算法优化问题,由于标准粒子群优化算法(PSO)在高维复杂函数优化中易早收敛,影响全系统优化。为改进的混合粒子群优化算法,提出了一种基于混沌和差分进化的混合粒子群优化算法(CDEHPSO)。把基于Logistic映射的混沌序列引入到种群初始化操作中。在算法进化过程中,通过一种粒子早熟判断机制,在基本粒子群优化算法中引入了差分变异、交叉和选择操作,对早熟粒子个体进行差分进化操作,从而维持了种群的多样性并有效避免了算法陷入局部最优。仿真结果表明,相比于粒子群优化算法和差分进化算法(DE),CDEHPSO算法具有收敛速度快、搜索能力强的优点。     

一种改进粒子滤波算法及其在多径估计中的应用

针对传统粒子滤波存在的粒子枯竭问题,提出一种基于自适应差分进化的粒子滤波算法。利用自适应差分进化算法代替粒子滤波中的重采样策略来产生新粒子,使粒子向状态后验概率密度函数的高似然区移动,同时提高粒子的多样性。通过一种非线性自适应调节策略自适应地调整变异因子和交叉因子,以提高改进粒子滤波中差分进化的寻优能力。应用于多径估计的仿真结果表明,该算法可克服粒子枯竭问题,与粒子滤波、扩展卡尔曼滤波和差分进化的粒子滤波算法相比,具有更好的多径估计性能。     

求解约束优化问题的粒子进化变异遗传算法

设计一种求解约束优化问题的粒子进化变异遗传算法(IGA_PSE).首先,分析候选解约束条件离差统计信息与约束违反函数之间的关系及其性质,基于约束条件离差统计信息提出一种改进约束处理方法;其次,基于粒子进化策略提出3种新变异算子;然后,讨论该算法早熟收敛的3种情况,并提出相应的种群多样化维持策略;最后,通过数值实验表明所提出的算法能够有效求解约束优化问题.     

基于自适应进化学习的约束多目标粒子群优化算法

针对约束边界粒子在边界区域搜索能力不足的问题,提出一种基于自适应进化学习的约束多目标粒子群优化算法。该算法根据不符合约束条件粒子的约束违反程度,修正优化算法的进化学习公式,提高算法在约束边界区域的搜索能力;通过引入一种基于拥挤距离的Pareto最优解分布性动态维护策略,在不增加算法复杂度的前提下改进Pareto前沿的分布性。实验结果表明,所提出的算法可以获得具有更好收敛性、分布性和多样性的Pareto前沿。     

动态罚函数法求解约束优化问题

针对罚函数法在求解约束优化问题时罚系数不易选取的问题,提出一种基于动态罚函数的差分进化算法.利用罚函数法将约束优化问题转化为无约束优化问题.为平衡种群的目标函数和约束违反程度,结合ε约束法设计了一种动态罚系数策略,其中罚系数随着种群质量和进化代数的改变而改变.采用差分进化算法更新种群直到搜索到最优解.对IEEE CEC...     

一种组合粒子群和差分进化的多目标优化算法

在求解多目标优化问题时,针对粒子群优化算法容易陷入局部极值的现象,提出了一种组合粒子群和差分进化的多目标优化算法,使用粒子群优化算法和差分进化算法共同产生新粒子,通过一个判断因子控制两种算法的使用比例,并对粒子群优化算法的速度更新公式进行了改变,以提高搜索效率.通过三个测试函数进行了仿真,并同NSGA-Ⅱ、MOPSO-CD进行了比较.实验结果表明改进算法求得的Pareto解集收敛性和多样性好,并且算法稳定性高,运行速度快.     

求解电力系统经济调度问题的改进粒子群优化算法

电力系统经济调度问题是电力系统中的一个重要的研究课题,针对该问题,提出一种改进粒子群优化(ODPSO)算法.改进算法在搜索前期,采用广义的反向学习策略,使算法能够快速地靠近较优的搜索区域,从而提高收敛速度;在搜索后期,借鉴差分进化算法的进化机制设计改进的变异和交叉策略,对当前种群的最优粒子进行更新,从而提高种群的多样性,进而协助算法获得全局最优解.为了验证改进粒子群优化算法的有效性,对CEC2006提出的22个基准约束测试函数进行仿真,结果表明改进算法相比其他算法在寻优精度和稳定性上更具优势.最后,将改进算法应用于考虑机组爬坡速率约束、机组禁行区域约束以及电力平衡约束的两个电力系统经济调度问题,取得了令人满意的结果.     

改进差异演化算法求解约束优化问题

在现实生活中许多实际问题都可以转化为约束优化问题,并且实际问题通常都很复杂,其函数形态各具特色,传统基于梯度信息的各种求解策略对于具有不可微、多峰及非凸的非线性函数约束优化问题很难凑效。而最近兴起的智能类算法却对这类问题的求解效果突出,在借鉴国外的差异演化算法研究成果基础上,运用改进差异演化算法来求解约束优化问题。最后通过实例进行仿真实验,结果表明改进差异演化算法在求解约束优化问题时具有一定的优越性。     

一种改进的约束优化差分进化算法

提出一种改进的差分进化算法用于求解约束优化问题.该算法在处理约束时不引入惩罚因子,使约束处理问题简单化.利用佳点集方法初始化个体以维持种群的多样性.结合差分进化算法两种不同变异策略的特点,对可行个体与不可行个体分别采用DE/best/1变异策略和DE/rand/1策略,以提高算法的全局收敛性能和收敛速率.用几个标准的Benchmark问题进行了测试,实验结果表明该算法是一种求解约束优化问题的有效方法.     

ε constrained differential evolution with pre-estimated comparison using gradient-based approximation for constrained optimization problems

Many real-world problems can be categorized as constrained optimization problems. So, designing effective algorithms for constrained optimization problems become more and more important. In designing algorithms, how to guide the individuals moving more efficiently towards the feasible region is one of the most important aspects on finding the optimum of constrained optimization problems. In this paper, we propose an improved ε constrained differential evolution, which combines with pre-estimated comparison gradient based approximation. The proposed algorithm uses gradient matrix to determine whether the trail vector generated by differential evolution algorithm is worth using the fitness function to evaluate it or not. Pre-estimated comparison gradient based approximation is used as a detector to find the promising offspring and in this way can we guide the individuals moving towards the feasible region. The proposed method is tested both on twenty-four benchmark functions and four well-known engineering optimization problems. Experimental results show that the proposed algorithm is highly competitive in comparing with other state-of-the-art algorithms. The proposed algorithm offers higher accuracy in engineering optimization problems for constrained optimization problems.     

A novel modified differential evolution algorithm for constrained optimization problems

A novel modified differential evolution algorithm (NMDE) is proposed to solve constrained optimization problems in this paper. The NMDE algorithm modifies scale factor and crossover rate using an adaptive strategy. For any solution, if it is at a standstill, its own scale factor and crossover rate will be adjusted in terms of the information of all successful solutions. We can obtain satisfactory feasible solutions for constrained optimization problems by combining the NMDE algorithm and a common penalty function method. Experimental results show that the proposed algorithm can yield better solutions than those reported in the literature for most problems, and it can be an efficient alternative to solving constrained optimization problems.     

结合增广Lagrange罚函数的约束优化差分进化算法

利用增广Lagrange罚函数处理问题的约束条件,提出了一种新的约束优化差分进化算法。基于增广Lagrange惩罚函数,将原约束优化问题转换为界约束优化问题。在进化过程中,根据个体的适应度值将种群分为精英种群和普通种群,分别采用不同的变异策略,以平衡算法的全局和局部搜索能力。用10个经典Benchmark问题进行了测试,实验结果表明,该算法能有效地处理不同的约束优化问题。     

Constrained min–max optimization via the improved constraint-activated differential evolution with escape vectors

In system design, the best system designed under a simple experimental environment may not be suitable for application in real world if dramatic changes caused by uncertainties contained in the real world are considered. To deal with the problem caused by uncertainties, designers should try their best to get the most robust solution. The most robust solution can be obtained by constrained min–max optimization algorithms. In this paper, the scheme of generating escape vectors has been proposed to solve the problem of premature convergence of differential evolution. After applying the proposed scheme to the constrained min–max optimization algorithm, the performance of the algorithm could be greatly improved. To evaluate the performance of constrained min–max optimization algorithms, more complex test problems have also been proposed in this paper. Experimental results show that the improved constrained min–max optimization algorithm is able to achieve a quite satisfied success rate on all considered test problems under limited accuracy.     

A line up evolutionary algorithm for solving nonlinear constrained optimization problems

In this work a complete framework is presented for solving nonlinear constrained optimization problems, based on the line-up differential evolution (LUDE) algorithm which is proposed for solving unconstrained problems. Linear and/or nonlinear constraints are handled by embodying them in an augmented Lagrangian function, where the penalty parameters and multipliers are adapted as the execution of the algorithm proceeds. The LUDE algorithm maintains a population of solutions, which is continuously improved as it thrives from generation to generation. In each generation the solutions are lined up according to the corresponding objective function values. The position's in the line are very important, since they determine to what extent the crossover and the mutation operators are applied to each particular solution. The efficiency of the proposed methodology is illustrated by solving numerous unconstrained and constrained optimization problems and comparing it with other optimization techniques that can be found in the literature.     

Self-adaptive differential evolution algorithm with α-constrained-domination principle for constrained multi-objective optimization

Real-world problems are inherently constrained optimization problems often with multiple conflicting objectives. To solve such constrained multi-objective problems effectively, in this paper, we put forward a new approach which integrates self-adaptive differential evolution algorithm with α-constrained-domination principle, named SADE-αCD. In SADE-αCD, the trial vector generation strategies and the DE parameters are gradually self-adjusted adaptively based on the knowledge learnt from the previous searches in generating improved solutions. Furthermore, by incorporating domination principle into α-constrained method, α-constrained-domination principle is proposed to handle constraints in multi-objective problems. The advantageous performance of SADE-αCD is validated by comparisons with non-dominated sorting genetic algorithm-II, a representative of state-of-the-art in multi-objective evolutionary algorithms, and constrained multi-objective differential evolution, over fourteen test problems and four well-known constrained multi-objective engineering design problems. The performance indicators show that SADE-αCD is an effective approach to solving constrained multi-objective problems, which is basically enabled by the integration of self-adaptive strategies and α-constrained-domination principle.     

一种改进的多目标约束优化差分进化算法

提出一种新的多目标优化差分进化算法用于求解约束优化问题.该算法利用佳点集方法初始化个体以维持种群的多样性.将约束优化问题转化为两个目标的多目标优化问题.基于Pareto支配关系,将种群分为Pareto子集和Non-Pareto子集,结合差分进化算法两种不同变异策略的特点,对Non-Pareto子集和Pareto子集分别采用DE/best/1变异策略和DE/rand/1变异策略.数值实验结果表明该算法具有较好的寻优效果.