Finding Induced Paths of Given Parity in Claw-Free Graphs

The Parity Path problem is to decide if a given graph contains both an induced path of odd length and an induced path of even length between two specified vertices. In the related problems Odd Induced Path and Even Induced Path, the goal is to determine whether an induced path of odd, respectively even, length between two specified vertices exists. Although all three problems are NP-complete in general, we show that they can be solved in $\mathcal{O}(n^{5})$ time for the class of claw-free graphs. Two vertices s and t form an even pair in G if every induced path from s to t in G has even length. Our results imply that the problem of deciding if two specified vertices of a claw-free graph form an even pair, as well as the problem of deciding if a given claw-free graph has an even pair, can be solved in $\mathcal{O}(n^{5})$ time and $\mathcal{O}(n^{7})$ time, respectively. We also show that we can decide in $\mathcal{O}(n^{7})$ time whether a claw-free graph has an induced cycle of given parity through a specified vertex. Finally, we show that a shortest induced path of given parity between two specified vertices of a claw-free perfect graph can be found in $\mathcal {O}(n^{7})$ time.     

Tight Bounds for Distributed Minimum-Weight Spanning Tree Verification

This paper introduces the notion of distributed verification without preprocessing. It focuses on the Minimum-weight Spanning Tree (MST) verification problem and establishes tight upper and lower bounds for the time and message complexities of this problem. Specifically, we provide an MST verification algorithm that achieves simultaneously $\tilde{O}(m)$ messages and $\tilde{O}(\sqrt{n} + D)$ time, where m is the number of edges in the given graph G, n is the number of nodes, and D is G’s diameter. On the other hand, we show that any MST verification algorithm must send $\tilde{\varOmega}(m)$ messages and incur $\tilde{\varOmega}(\sqrt{n} + D)$ time in worst case. Our upper bound result appears to indicate that the verification of an MST may be easier than its construction, since for MST construction, both lower bounds of $\tilde{\varOmega}(m)$ messages and $\tilde{\varOmega}(\sqrt{n} + D)$ time hold, but at the moment there is no known distributed algorithm that constructs an MST and achieves simultaneously $\tilde{O}(m)$ messages and $\tilde{O}(\sqrt{n} + D)$ time. Specifically, the best known time-optimal algorithm (using ${\tilde{O}}(\sqrt {n} + D)$ time) requires O(m+n ^3/2) messages, and the best known message-optimal algorithm (using ${\tilde{O}}(m)$ messages) requires O(n) time. On the other hand, our lower bound results indicate that the verification of an MST is not significantly easier than its construction.     

Exact and Parameterized Algorithms for Max Internal Spanning Tree

We consider the $\mathcal{NP}$ -hard problem of finding a spanning tree with a maximum number of internal vertices. This problem is a generalization of the famous Hamiltonian Path problem. Our dynamic-programming algorithms for general and degree-bounded graphs have running times of the form $\mathcal{O}^{*}(c^{n})$ with c≤2. For graphs with bounded degree, c<2. The main result, however, is a branching algorithm for graphs with maximum degree three. It only needs polynomial space and has a running time of $\mathcal{O}(1.8612^{n})$ when analyzed with respect to the number of vertices. We also show that its running time is $2.1364^{k} n^{\mathcal{O}(1)}$ when the goal is to find a spanning tree with at least k internal vertices. Both running time bounds are obtained via a Measure & Conquer analysis, the latter one being a novel use of this kind of analysis for parameterized algorithms.     

A new PAC bound for intersection-closed concept classes

For hyper-rectangles in $\mathbb{R}^{d}$ Auer (1997) proved a PAC bound of $O(\frac{1}{\varepsilon}(d+\log \frac{1}{\delta}))$ , where $\varepsilon$ and $\delta$ are the accuracy and confidence parameters. It is still an open question whether one can obtain the same bound for intersection-closed concept classes of VC-dimension $d$ in general. We present a step towards a solution of this problem showing on one hand a new PAC bound of $O(\frac{1}{\varepsilon}(d\log d + \log \frac{1}{\delta}))$ for arbitrary intersection-closed concept classes, complementing the well-known bounds $O(\frac{1}{\varepsilon}(\log \frac{1}{\delta}+d\log \frac{1}{\varepsilon}))$ and $O(\frac{d}{\varepsilon}\log \frac{1}{\delta})$ of Blumer et al. and (1989) and Haussler, Littlestone and Warmuth (1994). Our bound is established using the closure algorithm, that generates as its hypothesis the intersection of all concepts that are consistent with the positive training examples. On the other hand, we show that many intersection-closed concept classes including e.g. maximum intersection-closed classes satisfy an additional combinatorial property that allows a proof of the optimal bound of $O(\frac{1}{\varepsilon}(d+\log \frac{1}{\delta}))$ . For such improved bounds the choice of the learning algorithm is crucial, as there are consistent learning algorithms that need $\Omega(\frac{1}{\varepsilon}(d\log\frac{1}{\varepsilon} +\log\frac{1}{\delta}))$ examples to learn some particular maximum intersection-closed concept classes.     

On the Exact Complexity of Evaluating Quantified k -CNF

We relate the exponential complexities 2 ^s(k)n of $\textsc {$k$-sat}$ and the exponential complexity $2^{s(\textsc {eval}(\mathrm {\varPi }_{2} 3\textsc {-cnf}))n}$ of $\textsc {eval}(\mathrm {\varPi }_{2} 3\textsc {-cnf})$ (the problem of evaluating quantified formulas of the form $\forall\vec{x} \exists\vec{y} \textsc {F}(\vec {x},\vec{y})$ where F is a 3-cnf in $\vec{x}$ variables and $\vec{y}$ variables) and show that s(∞) (the limit of s(k) as k→∞) is at most $s(\textsc {eval}(\mathrm {\varPi }_{2} 3\textsc {-cnf}))$ . Therefore, if we assume the Strong Exponential-Time Hypothesis, then there is no algorithm for $\textsc {eval}(\mathrm {\varPi }_{2} 3\textsc {-cnf})$ running in time 2 ^cn with c<1. On the other hand, a nontrivial exponential-time algorithm for $\textsc {eval}(\mathrm {\varPi }_{2} 3\textsc {-cnf})$ would provide a $\textsc {$k$-sat}$ solver with better exponent than all current algorithms for sufficiently large k. We also show several syntactic restrictions of the evaluation problem $\textsc {eval}(\mathrm {\varPi }_{2} 3\textsc {-cnf})$ have nontrivial algorithms, and provide strong evidence that the hardest cases of $\textsc {eval}(\mathrm {\varPi }_{2} 3\textsc {-cnf})$ must have a mixture of clauses of two types: one universally quantified literal and two existentially quantified literals, or only existentially quantified literals. Moreover, the hardest cases must have at least n?o(n) universally quantified variables, and hence only o(n) existentially quantified variables. Our proofs involve the construction of efficient minimally unsatisfiable $\textsc {$k$-cnf}$ s and the application of the Sparsification lemma.     

Improved Approximation of Linear Threshold Functions

We prove two main results on how arbitrary linear threshold functions ${f(x) = {\rm sign}(w \cdot x - \theta)}$ over the n-dimensional Boolean hypercube can be approximated by simple threshold functions. Our first result shows that every n-variable threshold function f is ${\epsilon}$ -close to a threshold function depending only on ${{\rm Inf}(f)^2 \cdot {\rm poly}(1/\epsilon)}$ many variables, where ${{\rm Inf}(f)}$ denotes the total influence or average sensitivity of f. This is an exponential sharpening of Friedgut’s well-known theorem (Friedgut in Combinatorica 18(1):474–483, 1998), which states that every Boolean function f is ${\epsilon}$ -close to a function depending only on ${2^{O({\rm Inf}(f)/\epsilon)}}$ many variables, for the case of threshold functions. We complement this upper bound by showing that ${\Omega({\rm Inf}(f)^2 + 1/\epsilon^2)}$ many variables are required for ${\epsilon}$ -approximating threshold functions. Our second result is a proof that every n-variable threshold function is ${\epsilon}$ -close to a threshold function with integer weights at most ${{\rm poly}(n) \cdot 2^{\tilde{O}(1/\epsilon^{2/3})}.}$ This is an improvement, in the dependence on the error parameter ${\epsilon}$ , on an earlier result of Servedio (Comput Complex 16(2):180–209, 2007) which gave a ${{\rm poly}(n) \cdot 2^{\tilde{O}(1/\epsilon^{2})}}$ bound. Our improvement is obtained via a new proof technique that uses strong anti-concentration bounds from probability theory. The new technique also gives a simple and modular proof of the original result of Servedio (Comput Complex 16(2):180–209, 2007) and extends to give low-weight approximators for threshold functions under a range of probability distributions other than the uniform distribution.     

Rounds in Combinatorial Search

A set system $\mathcal{H} \subseteq2^{[m]}$ is said to be separating if for every pair of distinct elements x,y∈[m] there exists a set $H\in\mathcal{H}$ such that H contains exactly one of them. The search complexity of a separating system $\mathcal{H} \subseteq 2^{[m]}$ is the minimum number of questions of type “x∈H?” (where $H \in\mathcal{H}$ ) needed in the worst case to determine a hidden element x∈[m]. If we receive the answer before asking a new question then we speak of the adaptive complexity, denoted by $\mathrm{c} (\mathcal{H})$ ; if the questions are all fixed beforehand then we speak of the non-adaptive complexity, denoted by $\mathrm{c}_{na} (\mathcal{H})$ . If we are allowed to ask the questions in at most k rounds then we speak of the k-round complexity of $\mathcal{H}$ , denoted by $\mathrm{c}_{k} (\mathcal{H})$ . It is clear that $|\mathcal{H}| \geq\mathrm{c}_{na} (\mathcal{H}) = \mathrm{c}_{1} (\mathcal{H}) \geq\mathrm{c}_{2} (\mathcal{H}) \geq\cdots\geq\mathrm{c}_{m} (\mathcal{H}) = \mathrm{c} (\mathcal{H})$ . A group of problems raised by G.O.H. Katona is to characterize those separating systems for which some of these inequalities are tight. In this paper we are discussing set systems $\mathcal{H}$ with the property $|\mathcal{H}| = \mathrm{c}_{k} (\mathcal{H}) $ for any k≥3. We give a necessary condition for this property by proving a theorem about traces of hypergraphs which also has its own interest.     

Completions of cut systems in Q-sets

Let $ Q$ be a complete residuated lattice. Let $\text {SetR}(Q)$ be the category of sets with similarity relations with values in $ Q$ (called $ Q$ -sets), which is an analogy of the category of classical sets with relations as morphisms. A cut in an $ Q$ -set $(A,\delta )$ is a system $(C_{\alpha })_{\alpha \in Q}$ , where $C_{\alpha }$ are subsets of $A\times Q$ . It is well known that in the category $\text {SetR}(Q)$ , there is a close relation between special cuts (called f-cuts) in an $ Q$ -set on one hand and fuzzy sets in the same $ Q$ -set, on the other hand. Moreover, there exists a completion procedure according to which any cut $(C_{\alpha })_{\alpha }$ can be extended onto an f-cut $(\overline{C_{\alpha }})_{\alpha }$ . In the paper, we prove that the completion procedure is, in some sense, the best possible. This will be expressed by the theorem which states that the category of f-cuts is a full reflective subcategory in the category of cuts.     

D-Separation and computation of probability distributions in Bayesian networks

Consider a family ${(X_i)_{i \in I}}$ of random variables endowed with the structure of a Bayesian network, and a subset S of I. This paper examines the problem of computing the probability distribution of the subfamily ${(X_{a})_{a \in S}}$ (respectively the probability distribution of ${ (X_{b})_{b \in {\bar{S}}}}$ , where ${{\bar{S}} = I - S}$ , conditional on ${(X_{a})_{a \in S}}$ ). This paper presents some theoretical results that makes it possible to compute joint and conditional probabilities over a subset of variables by computing over separate components. In other words, it is demonstrated that it is possible to decompose this task into several parallel computations, each related to a subset of S (respectively of ${{\bar{S}}}$ ); these partial results are then put together as a final product. In computing the probability distribution over ${(X_a)_{a \in S}}$ , this procedure results in the production of a structure of level two Bayesian network structure for S.     

A note on reverse scheduling with maximum lateness objective

The inverse and reverse counterparts of the single-machine scheduling problem $1||L_{\max }$ are studied in [2], in which the complexity classification is provided for various combinations of adjustable parameters (due dates and processing times) and for five different types of norm: $\ell _{1},\ell _{2},\ell _{\infty },\ell _{H}^{\Sigma } $ , and $\ell _{H}^{\max }$ . It appears that the $O(n^{2})$ -time algorithm for the reverse problem with adjustable due dates contains a flaw. In this note, we present the structural properties of the reverse model, establishing a link with the forward scheduling problem with due dates and deadlines. For the four norms $\ell _{1},\ell _{\infty },\ell _{H}^{\Sigma }$ , and $ \ell _{H}^{\max }$ , the complexity results are derived based on the properties of the corresponding forward problems, while the case of the norm $\ell _{2}$ is treated separately. As a by-product, we resolve an open question on the complexity of problem $1||\sum \alpha _{j}T_{j}^{2}$ .     

New types of fuzzy ideals of near-rings

In this paper, we consider the $(\in_{\gamma},\in_{\gamma} \vee \; \hbox{q}_{\delta})$ -fuzzy and $(\overline{\in}_{\gamma},\overline{\in}_{\gamma} \vee \; \overline{\hbox{q}}_{\delta})$ -fuzzy subnear-rings (ideals) of a near-ring. Some new characterizations are also given. In particular, we introduce the concepts of (strong) prime $(\in_{\gamma},\in_{\gamma} \vee \; \hbox{q}_{\delta})$ -fuzzy ideals of near-rings and discuss the relationship between strong prime $(\in_{\gamma},\in_{\gamma} \vee \; \hbox{q}_{\delta})$ -fuzzy ideals and prime $(\in_{\gamma},\in_{\gamma} \vee \; \hbox{q}_{\delta})$ -fuzzy ideals of near-rings.     

\lambda -Statistical convergence of fuzzy numbers and fuzzy functions of order \theta

In this paper, we introduce the concept of $\lambda $ -statistical convergence of order $\theta $ and strong $\lambda $ -summability of order $\theta $ for the sequence of fuzzy numbers. Further the same concept is extended to the sequence of fuzzy functions and introduce the spaces like $S_\lambda ^\theta (\hat{f})$ and $\omega _{\lambda p} ^\theta (\hat{f})$ . Some inclusion relations in those spaces and also the underlying relation between these two spaces are also obtained.     

Branching Time Logics \mathcal {BTL}^{\mathrm {U,S}}_{\mathrm {N},\mathrm {N}^{-1}}(\mathcal {Z})_{\alpha } with Operations Until and Since Based on Bundles of Integer Numbers, Logical Consecutions, Deciding Algorithms

This paper is intended as an attempt to describe logical consequence in branching time logics. We study temporal branching time logics $\mathcal {BTL}^{\mathrm {U,S}}_{\mathrm {N},\mathrm {N}^{-1}}(\mathcal {Z})_{\alpha }$ which use the standard operations Until and Next and dual operations Since and Previous (LTL, as standard, uses only Until and Next). Temporal logics $\mathcal {BTL}^{\mathrm {U,S}}_{\mathrm {N},\mathrm {N}^{-1}}(\mathcal {Z})_{\alpha }$ are generated by semantics based on Kripke/Hinttikka structures with linear frames of integer numbers $\mathcal {Z}$ with a single node (glued zeros). For $\mathcal {BTL}^{\mathrm {U,S}}_{\mathrm {N},\mathrm {N}^{-1}}(\mathcal {Z})_{\alpha }$ , the permissible branching of the node is limited by α (where 1≤α≤ω). We prove that any logic $\mathcal {BTL}^{\mathrm {U,S}}_{\mathrm {N},\mathrm {N}^{-1}}(\mathcal {Z})_{\alpha }$ is decidable w.r.t. admissible consecutions (inference rules), i.e. we find an algorithm recognizing consecutions admissible in $\mathcal {BTL}^{\mathrm {U,S}}_{\mathrm {N},\mathrm {N}^{-1}}(\mathcal {Z})_{\alpha }$ . As a consequence, it implies that $\mathcal {BTL}^{\mathrm {U,S}}_{\mathrm {N},\mathrm {N}^{-1}}(\mathcal {Z})_{\alpha }$ itself is decidable and solves the satisfiability problem.     

Fast Polynomial-Space Algorithms Using Inclusion-Exclusion

Given a graph with n vertices, k terminals and positive integer weights not larger than c, we compute a minimum Steiner Tree in $\mathcal{O}^{\star}(2^{k}c)$ time and $\mathcal{O}^{\star}(c)$ space, where the $\mathcal{O}^{\star}$ notation omits terms bounded by a polynomial in the input-size. We obtain the result by defining a generalization of walks, called branching walks, and combining it with the Inclusion-Exclusion technique. Using this combination we also give $\mathcal{O}^{\star}(2^{n})$ -time polynomial space algorithms for Degree Constrained Spanning Tree, Maximum Internal Spanning Tree and #Spanning Forest with a given number of components. Furthermore, using related techniques, we also present new polynomial space algorithms for computing the Cover Polynomial of a graph, Convex Tree Coloring and counting the number of perfect matchings of a graph.     

Anti-unification for Unranked Terms and Hedges

We study anti-unification for unranked terms and hedges that may contain term and hedge variables. The anti-unification problem of two hedges ${\tilde{s}}_1$ and ${\tilde{s}}_2$ is concerned with finding their generalization, a hedge ${\tilde{q}}$ such that both ${\tilde{s}}_1$ and ${\tilde{s}}_2$ are instances of ${\tilde{q}}$ under some substitutions. Hedge variables help to fill in gaps in generalizations, while term variables abstract single (sub)terms with different top function symbols. First, we design a complete and minimal algorithm to compute least general generalizations. Then, we improve the efficiency of the algorithm by restricting possible alternatives permitted in the generalizations. The restrictions are imposed with the help of a rigidity function, which is a parameter in the improved algorithm and selects certain common subsequences from the hedges to be generalized. The obtained rigid anti-unification algorithm is further made more precise by permitting combination of hedge and term variables in generalizations. Finally, we indicate a possible application of the algorithm in software engineering.     

Order optimal information spreading using algebraic gossip

In this paper we study gossip based information spreading with bounded message sizes. We use algebraic gossip to disseminate $k$ distinct messages to all $n$ nodes in a network. For arbitrary networks we provide a new upper bound for uniform algebraic gossip of $O((k+\log n + D)\varDelta )$ rounds with high probability, where $D$ and $\varDelta $ are the diameter and the maximum degree in the network, respectively. For many topologies and selections of $k$ this bound improves previous results, in particular, for graphs with a constant maximum degree it implies that uniform gossip is order optimal and the stopping time is $\varTheta (k + D)$ . To eliminate the factor of $\varDelta $ from the upper bound we propose a non-uniform gossip protocol, TAG, which is based on algebraic gossip and an arbitrary spanning tree protocol $\mathcal{S } $ . The stopping time of TAG is $O(k+\log n +d(\mathcal{S })+t(\mathcal{S }))$ , where $t(\mathcal{S })$ is the stopping time of the spanning tree protocol, and $d(\mathcal{S })$ is the diameter of the spanning tree. We provide two general cases in which this bound leads to an order optimal protocol. The first is for $k=\varOmega (n)$ , where, using a simple gossip broadcast protocol that creates a spanning tree in at most linear time, we show that TAG finishes after $\varTheta (n)$ rounds for any graph. The second uses a sophisticated, recent gossip protocol to build a fast spanning tree on graphs with large weak conductance. In turn, this leads to the optimally of TAG on these graphs for $k=\varOmega (\text{ polylog }(n))$ . The technique used in our proofs relies on queuing theory, which is an interesting approach that can be useful in future gossip analysis.     

Modeling of subjective judgments made by a researcher-modeler about the model of the research object

Methods are considered for the mathematic modeling of incomplete and unreliable knowledge about the model M(x) of the research object expressed in the form of subjective judgments made by the researcher-modeler (r-m) about the possible values of the unknown parameter x ∈ X defining the model. The mathematical model of subjective judgments is defined as the space (X, P(X), $Pl^{\tilde x} $ , $Bel^{\tilde x} $ ), in which the indeterminate element (i.el.) $\tilde x$ characterizes (as an undefined propositional variable) the subjective judgments made by the r-m about the validity of each value x ∈ X by the values of measures such as the plausibility $Pl^{\tilde x} $ of the equality $\tilde x$ = x, and belief $Bel^{\tilde x} $ in the inequality $\tilde x$ ≠ x. If there are observational data on the subject, available to the r-m he can use them to construct an empirical estimate of the i.el. $\tilde x$ and an empirical model (X, P(X), $Pl^{\tilde x} $ , $Bel^{\tilde x} $ ) of the subjective judgments about possible values of x ∈ X.     

Validating the Knuth-Morris-Pratt Failure Function,Fast and Online

Let $\pi'_{w}$ denote the failure function of the Knuth-Morris-Pratt algorithm for a word w. In this paper we study the following problem: given an integer array $A'[1 \mathinner {\ldotp \ldotp }n]$ , is there a word w over an arbitrary alphabet Σ such that $A'[i]=\pi'_{w}[i]$ for all i? Moreover, what is the minimum cardinality of Σ required? We give an elementary and self-contained $\mathcal{O}(n\log n)$ time algorithm for this problem, thus improving the previously known solution (Duval et al. in Conference in honor of Donald E. Knuth, 2007), which had no polynomial time bound. Using both deeper combinatorial insight into the structure of π′ and advanced algorithmic tools, we further improve the running time to $\mathcal{O}(n)$ .     

On matrices, automata, and double counting in constraint programming

Matrix models are ubiquitous for constraint problems. Many such problems have a matrix of variables $\mathcal{M}$ , with the same constraint C defined by a finite-state automaton $\mathcal{A}$ on each row of $\mathcal{M}$ and a global cardinality constraint $\mathit{gcc}$ on each column of $\mathcal{M}$ . We give two methods for deriving, by double counting, necessary conditions on the cardinality variables of the $\mathit{gcc}$ constraints from the automaton $\mathcal{A}$ . The first method yields linear necessary conditions and simple arithmetic constraints. The second method introduces the cardinality automaton, which abstracts the overall behaviour of all the row automata and can be encoded by a set of linear constraints. We also provide a domain consistency filtering algorithm for the conjunction of lexicographic ordering constraints between adjacent rows of $\mathcal{M}$ and (possibly different) automaton constraints on the rows. We evaluate the impact of our methods in terms of runtime and search effort on a large set of nurse rostering problem instances.     

DNF sparsification and a faster deterministic counting algorithm

Given a DNF formula f on n variables, the two natural size measures are the number of terms or size s(f) and the maximum width of a term w(f). It is folklore that small DNF formulas can be made narrow: if a formula has m terms, it can be ${\epsilon}$ -approximated by a formula with width ${{\rm log}(m/{\epsilon})}$ . We prove a converse, showing that narrow formulas can be sparsified. More precisely, any width w DNF irrespective of its size can be ${\epsilon}$ -approximated by a width w DNF with at most ${(w\, {\rm log}(1/{\epsilon}))^{O(w)}}$ terms. We combine our sparsification result with the work of Luby & Velickovic (1991, Algorithmica 16(4/5):415–433, 1996) to give a faster deterministic algorithm for approximately counting the number of satisfying solutions to a DNF. Given a formula on n variables with poly(n) terms, we give a deterministic ${n^{\tilde{O}({\rm log}\, {\rm log} (n))}}$ time algorithm that computes an additive ${\epsilon}$ approximation to the fraction of satisfying assignments of f for ${\epsilon = 1/{\rm poly}({\rm log}\, n)}$ . The previous best result due to Luby and Velickovic from nearly two decades ago had a run time of ${n^{{\rm exp}(O(\sqrt{{\rm log}\, {\rm log} n}))}}$ (Luby & Velickovic 1991, in Algorithmica 16(4/5):415–433, 1996).