绿色建筑评估体系对建筑节能管理的启示

通过对NABERS、BREEAM、LEED、GBTOOL、CASBEE和中国绿色建筑评估标准的对比分析，指出建筑的节能管理是国外成熟的绿色建筑评估体系中比较重要的内容，而在我国还需要对此予以足够的重视。特别是针对既有建筑改造的评估，将建筑节能管理纳入主要的评估内容，不仅可以促进我国的评估体系与国外接轨，更重要的是可以提高我国建筑节能管理水平，提升物业管理单位节能文化，促进节能建筑和建筑的可持续化发展。     

以上海某办公建筑为例解读英国BREEAM绿色认证体系

BREEAM作为全球最早、应用范围最广的绿色建筑评估体系,受到了广泛关注。世界上许多绿色建筑评价体系都是在BREEAM基础上发展演变而来的。以上海市某办公建筑为例,解读BREEAM这个融合了国际化和本土化的绿色建筑评价体系。     

英国BREEAM社区评价体系对我国社区级绿道规划建设的启示

近年来,我国对社区级绿道规划建设的关注较少。而英国在绿道建设发展方面起步较早,同时,在BREEAM社区体系的评价与指导下,英国社区级绿道在建设和使用方面都取得了较好的反馈。为此,本文选取英国BREEAM社区体系中与社区级绿道建设相关的内容进行分析,以获得较高BREEAM评分的英格兰中部Castleward社区作为案例,总结得出其对我国社区级绿道规划建设的三方面启示。     

对生态住区评估系统中权重问题的思考

文章论述了权重系数在生态住区评估体系中的地位和作用.通过对比分析国外LEED、BREEAM、GBC三大评估体系的权重系数,说明了不同权重方案对不同评估系统的重要影响.以天津市生态居住区建设技术规程为例,对比说明了我国生态住区评估体系的编制中应该如何重视和处理权重问题.     

全球八大绿色建筑评估体系概览

〉英国BREEAM是英国一个自愿的绿色建筑评级体系，由英国建筑研究院开发，1990年实行．主要用于评估建筑的环境表现。BREEAM需要对建筑物在一系列环境问题下的表现进行评估之后才能得出评级结果（合格、好，非常好，优秀或杰出）。BREEAM利用以既定标准为基础的国际认可绩效措施来评估建筑物的特点、设计、施工和使用情况。     

建筑环境评估体系及比较

进入新世纪以来,可持续发展在世界范围内成为一个更加严峻的话题,为了更有效地控制和利用我们的环境资源,许多国家纷纷制定了相关的建筑环境评估体系。本文介绍了当今四个具影响力的环境评估体系,包括英国的 BREEAM体系,美国的 L E E DTM 系统,澳大利亚的NABERS以及中国的 GBCAS。通过对比阐述了四个体系不同的发展历程、内容、权重及特别之处。     

绿色建筑评估体系的对比与优化研究

从认证机构与程序、评估内容和辅助工具三方面对英国BREEAM、美国LEED、日本CASBEE和多国联合制定的GBTool4个绿色建筑评估体系进行对比研究,总结其优势与特点,并针对我国《绿色建筑评价标准》提出四方面的优化建议：提高认证机构成员的多学科与多行业参与,提高认证程序的可操作性,优化评估内容。     

用BREEAM 评价体系解读贵安可持续科技示范楼

文章借英国的BREEAM 绿色建筑评价体系的评估分项，对贵安清控人居科技示范楼进行详细地分析解读，借此探讨建筑师对可持续设计的思考。     

关于绿色建筑评估体系中权重系统的研究

近年来,许多国家和地区纷纷建立了自己的绿色建筑评估体系,对于一个成功的体系来说,科学合理的权重系统是非常重要的.本文针对权重系统对现在比较成熟的评估体系,如BREEAM、LEED、GBTOOL和CASBEE,进行了比较分析,并对确定权重的AHP法和Delphi法进行了研究.     

国际低碳可持续住宅评估体系比较研究

发展低碳可持续住宅评估体系以促进节能减排、优化生活环境,是应对全球气候变暖和实现人类可持续发展的重要手段。通过对目前国际上最具有代表性的几个住宅评估体系:英国的《可持续住宅规范》、美国的LEED和日本的CASBEE与中国《绿色建筑评价标准》以及《中国生态住区技术评估手册》,从发展历程、评估内容、评估软件、评估体系的市场化、公众教育等几方面进行综合分析,剖析各国住宅评估体系的优点以及不足,提出中国现阶段低碳可持续住宅评估体系制定所存在的问题和相关改进措施,为今后低碳可持续住宅评估体系的发展提出有力建议。     

Do sustainable community rating systems address resilience?

Extensive damages and numerous casualties are produced by natural disasters and hazards in urban areas. Hence, the absorption, recovery and adaptation to them through resilience are highly necessary to ensure operation and enhancement of urban systems. The significance of urbanization led to launch some tools such as BREEAM Communities, CASBEE for Urban Development, DNGB Urban Districts, Green Star Communities, LEED for Neighbourhood Development or STAR Community to promote sustainable development in communities and cities. After selecting the most relevant community rating systems, this research determined their adequacy to handle urban challenges by benchmarking them against the major international efforts and some relevant resilience assessment tools extracted from the study of eight global frameworks. Thus, the Sendai Framework and the 2030 Agenda represented the former, whilst the latter considered the City Resilience Index and the City Resilience Profiling Tool. The findings of this investigation revealed that the indicators of STAR Community and BREEAM Communities reflected the highest level of correspondence with the resilience assessment frameworks. However, the existence of prominent gaps in all the screened community rating systems suggests the need for developing a new tool involving both resilience and sustainability.     

国内外绿色工业建筑评价权重体系对比分析

随着绿色建筑的全面发展,国内绿色工业建筑评价体系逐步建立。通过将英国BREEAM工业建筑与国内绿色工业建筑评价的权重体系进行对比,得出BREEAM体系与国内绿色工业建筑评价体系的共性与差异,并以此对国内绿色工业建筑评价的权重体系提出建议。     

BIM在建筑节能改造可持续设计中的应用研究

随着全球气温变暖和可持续发展的标准日益严格,建筑节能改造项目大幅增加,在建筑改造项目中应遵循可持续性的理念.结合当前国际上可持续性决策方法及采用的环境计划认证标准(BREEAM和LEED)提出在改造项目中利用BIM可持续设计工具,建立建筑材料生命周期能量库,为改造项目的可持续性设计、评价提供可靠材料.     

国内外典型绿色建筑评价体系对比研究

将最具影响力的美国LEED、日本CASBEE、英国BREEAM与中国《绿色建筑评价标准》进行对比研究,在梳理其发展历史的基础上,从评价方法、评价指标、评价政策保障等方面进行深入剖析,从而对我国绿色建筑评价体系的完善提出相关的建议。     

A critical comparison of green building rating systems

Various green rating systems are established globally to evaluate the sustainability of construction projects. Their categories and criteria have been under constant updates to follow the sustainable trend of building development. This paper aims to develop a systematic review of the development of green rating systems. The specific objectives are: 1) discover how interest and research in green rating systems have developed; 2) identify the similarity,difference,strength and weakness of green rating systems;3) examine whether they fully assess the projects in all aspects of sustainability. Specifically,LEED( Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design),BREEAM( Building Research Establishment Assessment Method),CASBEE( Comprehensive Assessment Systemfor Building Environmental Efficiency) and Green Star NZ were analysed in this paper. The results indicate that BREEAM,LEED, and CASBEE have been utilized since late the 2000 s while Green Star NZ is still in its earlier stages. 70%of the research papers focusing on BREEAM,LEED,CASBEE are developed geographically in the USA,Canada, the UK,China, and Australia. Although these four rating systems were initiated in different contexts with different standards, Indoor Environment Quality,Energy,and Material are core common categories for all. Environmental concerns are the main focus in New Construction manuals while Society is emphasized in Neighbourhood Development manuals. Currently,BREEAM has been the only tool which could assess all four sustainable factors. Further in-depth research is anticipated to focus more on economic and institutional factors to improve the capability of green rating systems for sustainability assessment purposes.     

Green building assessment tool (GBAT) for integrated BIM-based design decisions

The benefits of BIM such as effective decision making, improved analysis, easier access to information and simpler green building certification provide an optimised solution for sustainable design and construction. This study proposes an IFC-based framework within an integrated BIM and sustainable data model for the design stage of the building project life cycle. We present the green building assessment tool (GBAT), which implements the proposed model and aids the design team in the generation of documentation necessary for obtaining green building certification. It extracts the necessary data from BIM models for calculating the green rating and provides feedback for further evaluation. A sample project is run and a green rating score table for the BREEAM materials category is obtained for validation of the model. This tool serves as a proof of concept that green data relevant for BREEAM certification can be automatically processed and used to inform the design.     

典型绿色建筑评价体系中节地条款比较

将中国绿色建筑评价体系与包括英国BREEAM、美国LEED、日本CASBEE在内的典型国外绿色建筑评估体系对节地条款的内容、权重体系及相应要求等进行比较研究。通过比较,可以发现选址、土地利用、生态环境是节地条款的主要组成部分。在LEED中,土地利用所占分值大于其他部分之和;在CASBEE中生态环境所占分值大于其他部分之和;在BREEAM及China GBL中,仍然是土地利用和生态环境占了最大的分值。同时,还发现了4个评价体系所共同关注的节地指标。此外,与其他体系相比,中国绿色建筑评价体系具有大量的控制项,且对应的绿色建筑等级越高对接地条款的要求就越严格。     

高速公路建设项目可持续发展指标体系研究

介绍了高速公路建设项目可持续发展的内涵,对高速公路建设项目可持续发展的评价内容进行了分析,并建立起可持续发展评价指标体系的框架,以使高速公路建设项目走真正的可持续发展之路。     

英国反贫困的地域政策及对中国的规划启示

本文通过梳理英国反贫困政策的分类、内容和争论,重点研究反贫困的地域政策(Area-Based Policies/Approaches)的内涵、发展阶段,以社区新政(New Deal for Communities)为例总结其具体内容和经验教训;分析新时期中国城市以贫困人口政策为主导的反贫困政策的局限性,探讨英国地域政策对中国城市规划的启示.本文有助于中国城市制定更加合理的反贫困的地域政策,对城市更新和社区规划编制有一定的借鉴价值,对于在规划领域促进社会和谐公平发展有一定参考意义.