Reducing model checking commitments for agent communication to model checking ARCTL and GCTL*

Social commitments have been extensively and effectively used to represent and model business contracts among autonomous agents having competing objectives in a variety of areas (e.g., modeling business processes and commitment-based protocols). However, the formal verification of social commitments and their fulfillment is still an active research topic. This paper presents CTLC⁺ that modifies CTLC, a temporal logic of commitments for agent communication that extends computation tree logic (CTL) logic to allow reasoning about communicating commitments and their fulfillment. The verification technique is based on reducing the problem of model checking CTLC⁺ into the problem of model checking ARCTL (the combination of CTL with action formulae) and the problem of model checking GCTL^* (a generalized version of CTL^* with action formulae) in order to respectively use the extended NuSMV symbolic model checker and the CWB-NC automata-based model checker as a benchmark. We also prove that the reduction techniques are sound and the complexity of model checking CTLC⁺ for concurrent programs with respect to the size of the components of these programs and the length of the formula is PSPACE-complete. This matches the complexity of model checking CTL for concurrent programs as shown by Kupferman et al. We finally provide two case studies taken from business domain along with their respective implementations and experimental results to illustrate the effectiveness and efficiency of the proposed technique. The first one is about the NetBill protocol and the second one considers the Contract Net protocol.     

Model checking temporal knowledge and commitments in multi-agent systems using reduction

Though modeling and verifying Multi-Agent Systems (MASs) have long been under study, there are still challenges when many different aspects need to be considered simultaneously. In fact, various frameworks have been carried out for modeling and verifying MASs with respect to knowledge and social commitments independently. However, considering them under the same framework still needs further investigation, particularly from the verification perspective. In this article, we present a new technique for model checking the logic of knowledge and commitments (CTLKC⁺). The proposed technique is fully-automatic and reduction-based in which we transform the problem of model checking CTLKC⁺ into the problem of model checking an existing logic of action called ARCTL. Concretely, we construct a set of transformation rules to formally reduce the CTLKC⁺ model into an ARCTL model and CTLKC⁺ formulae into ARCTL formulae to get benefit from the extended version of NuSMV symbolic model checker of ARCTL. Compared to a recent approach that reduces the problem of model checking CTLKC⁺ to another logic of action called GCTL¹, our technique has better scalability and efficiency. We also analyze the complexity of the proposed model checking technique. The results of this analysis reveal that the complexity of our reduction-based procedure is PSPACE-complete for local concurrent programs with respect to the size of these programs and the length of the formula being checked. From the time perspective, we prove that the complexity of the proposed approach is P-complete with regard to the size of the model and length of the formula, which makes it efficient. Finally, we implement our model checking approach on top of extended NuSMV and report verification results for the verification of the NetBill protocol, taken from business domain, against some desirable properties. The obtained results show the effectiveness of our model checking approach when the system scales up.     

On the soundness,completeness and applicability of the logic of knowledge and communicative commitments in multi-agent systems

Benthem’s correspondence theory is one of the most important tools of the theory of modal logics developed in the last three decades. Correspondence theory, a subfield of the model theory, reflects a systematic study of relations between classes of frames and modal language. In this paper, we use correspondence theory for modal logics to solve a problem not addressed yet in the literature, namely the soundness and completeness of a logic combining two different, yet related modalities: agents’ knowledge and commitments. The paper proves the soundness and completeness of this logic called CTLKC⁺. This work is highly significant as it proves that combining the two agents’ modalities resulted in a consistent logic that can be used to design reliable systems. The methodology is as follows: we develop a set of reasoning postulates (axioms) that reflect the interaction between agents’ knowledge and social commitments in multi-agent system (MAS) using the CTLKC⁺ logic and correspond them to certain classes of frames. In particular, we first give a name, formalization and meaning for each postulate. Then, we correspond the postulates to certain classes of frames and provide the required proofs. Thereafter, we present a discussion that illustrates the importance of the proposed postulates in MASs using a concrete application example called the NetBill protocol taken from the business domain. Finally, we show how the postulates were addressed in the literature. The existence of such a correspondence allows us to prove that the logic generated by any subset of these postulates is sound and complete with respect to models that are based on the corresponding frames. The ultimate goal of this paper is to further assess the logic of knowledge and commitments (CTLKC⁺) from a new perspective (i.e., the soundness and completeness). Consequently, this work advances the literature of logics in MASs and closes a gap that has not been explored before.     

Modeling and verifying probabilistic Multi-Agent Systems using knowledge and social commitments

Multi-Agent Systems (MASs) have long been modeled through knowledge and social commitments independently. In this paper, we present a new method that merges the two concepts to model and verify MASs in the presence of uncertainty. To express knowledge and social commitments simultaneously in uncertain settings, we define a new multi-modal logic called Probabilistic Computation Tree Logic of Knowledge and Commitments (PCTL^kc in short) which combines two existing probabilistic logics namely, probabilistic logic of knowledge PCTLK and probabilistic logic of commitments PCTLC. To model stochastic MASs, we present a new version of interpreted systems that captures the probabilistic behavior and accounts for the communication between interacting components. Then, we introduce a new probabilistic model checking procedure to check the compliance of target systems against some desirable properties written in PCTL^kc and report the obtained verification results. Our proposed model checking technique is reduction-based and consists in transforming the problem of model checking PCTL^kc into the problem of model checking a well established logic, namely PCTL. So doing provides us with the privilege of re-using the PRISM model checker to implement the proposed model checking approach. Finally, we demonstrate the effectiveness of our approach by presenting a real case study. This framework can be considered as a step forward towards closing the gap of capturing interactions between knowledge and social commitments in stochastic agent-based systems.     

Verifying conformance of multi-agent commitment-based protocols

Although several approaches have been proposed to specify multi-agent commitment-based protocols that capture flexible and rich interactions among autonomous and heterogeneous agents, very few of them synthesize their formal specification and automatic verification in an integrated framework. In this paper, we present a new logic-based language to specify commitment-based protocols, which is derived from ACTL^1c, a logic extending CTL¹ with modalities to represent and reason about social commitments and their actions. We present a reduction technique that formally transforms the problem of model checking ACTL^1c to the problem of model checking GCTL¹ (an extension of CTL¹ with action formulae). We prove that the reduction technique is sound and we fully implement it on top of the CWB-NC model checker to automatically verify the NetBill protocol, a motivated and specified example in the proposed specification language. We also apply the proposed technique to check the compliance of another protocol: the Contract Net protocol with given properties and report and discuss the obtained results. We finally develop a new symbolic algorithm to perform model checking dedicated to the proposed logic.     

时态认知逻辑CTL＊K的符号化模型检查算法

时序认知逻辑是由时序逻辑和认知逻辑组合而成的逻辑,主要应用于多主体系统的规范定义.大多数时序认知逻辑是基于CTL的,表达能力有限.并且已知的一些模型检查算法存在内存不足和状态爆炸等问题.讨论了基于CTL*的时态认知逻辑cTL*K的语法、语义和模型,它能够在表达力很强的时态逻辑CTL*基础上描述智能体的知识、目标等意向特征.并给出了CTL*K的模型检查算法,其核心思想就是将CTL*K公式的检查问题转化为CTL*公式的模型检查问题,可以使检查的系统规模得以大幅度提高.并且将算法编码后容易集成到NuSMV模型检查器.     

A connectionist computational model for epistemic and temporal reasoning

The importance of the efforts to bridge the gap between the connectionist and symbolic paradigms of artificial intelligence has been widely recognized. The merging of theory (background knowledge) and data learning (learning from examples) into neural-symbolic systems has indicated that such a learning system is more effective than purely symbolic or purely connectionist systems. Until recently, however, neural-symbolic systems were not able to fully represent, reason, and learn expressive languages other than classical propositional and fragments of first-order logic. In this article, we show that nonclassical logics, in particular propositional temporal logic and combinations of temporal and epistemic (modal) reasoning, can be effectively computed by artificial neural networks. We present the language of a connectionist temporal logic of knowledge (CTLK). We then present a temporal algorithm that translates CTLK theories into ensembles of neural networks and prove that the translation is correct. Finally, we apply CTLK to the muddy children puzzle, which has been widely used as a test-bed for distributed knowledge representation. We provide a complete solution to the puzzle with the use of simple neural networks, capable of reasoning about knowledge evolution in time and of knowledge acquisition through learning.     

多智体系统时态认知规范的模型检测算法

模型检测技术一直以来主要是检验用时态逻辑描述的规范,人们很少注意认知逻辑的模型检测问题,而在分布式系统领域,系统和协议的规范已广泛地采用知识逻辑来描述.着重研讨了时态认知逻辑的模型检测算法.在SMV(symbolic model verifier)模型检测器的基础上,根据知识的语义和集合理论,提出了多种检验知识和公共知识的算法,从而使SMV的检测功能由时态逻辑扩充到时态认知逻辑.这些方法也适用于其他以状态集合作为输出的模型检测方法和工具的功能扩充.     

On the relationship between annotated logic programs and nonmonotonic formalisms

Abstract

In the past we developed a semantics for a restricted annotated logic language for inheritance reasoning. Here we generalize it to annotated Horn logic programs. We first provide a formal account of the language, describe its semantics, and provide an interpreter written in Prolog for it. We then investigate its relationship to Belnap's 4-valued logic, Gelfond and Lifschitz's semantics for logic programs with negation, Brewka's prioritized default logics and other annotated logics due to Kifer et al.     

Branching-time logics with path relativisation

We define extensions of the full branching-time temporal logic CTL^? in which the path quantifiers are relativised by formal languages of infinite words, and consider its natural fragments obtained by extending the logics CTL and CTL⁺ in the same way. This yields a small and two-dimensional hierarchy of temporal logics parametrised by the class of languages used for the path restriction on one hand, and the use of temporal operators on the other. We motivate the study of such logics through two application scenarios: in abstraction and refinement they offer more precise means for the exclusion of spurious traces; and they may be useful in software synthesis where decidable logics without the finite model property are required. We study the relative expressive power of these logics as well as the complexities of their satisfiability and model-checking problems.     

Combining and automating classical and non-classical logics in classical higher-order logics

Numerous classical and non-classical logics can be elegantly embedded in Church??s simple type theory, also known as classical higher-order logic. Examples include propositional and quantified multimodal logics, intuitionistic logics, logics for security, and logics for spatial reasoning. Furthermore, simple type theory is sufficiently expressive to model combinations of embedded logics and it has a well understood semantics. Off-the-shelf reasoning systems for simple type theory exist that can be uniformly employed for reasoning within and about embedded logics and logics combinations. In this article we focus on combinations of (quantified) epistemic and doxastic logics and study their application for modeling and automating the reasoning of rational agents. We present illustrating example problems and report on experiments with off-the-shelf higher-order automated theorem provers.     

Maximal traces and path-based coalgebraic temporal logics

This paper gives a general coalgebraic account of temporal logics whose semantics involves a notion of computation path. Examples of such logics include the logic CTL* for transition systems and the logic PCTL for probabilistic transition systems. Our path-based temporal logics are interpreted over coalgebras of endofunctors obtained as the composition of a computation type (e.g. non-deterministic or stochastic) with a general transition type. The semantics of such logics relies on the existence of execution maps similar to the trace maps introduced by Jacobs and co-authors as part of the coalgebraic theory of finite traces (Hasuo et al., 2007 [1]). We consider finite execution maps derived from the theory of finite traces, and a new notion of maximal execution map that accounts for maximal, possibly infinite executions. The latter is needed to recover the logics CTL* and PCTL as specific path-based logics.     

Probabilistic Logic over Paths

We introduce a probabilistic modal logic PPL extending the work of [Ronald Fagin, Joseph Y. Halpern, and Nimrod Megiddo. A logic for reasoning about probabilities. Information and Computation, 87(1,2):78–128, 1990; Ronald Fagin and Joseph Y. Halpern. Reasoning about knowledge and probability. Journal of the ACM, 41(2):340–367, 1994] by allowing arbitrary nesting of a path probabilistic operator and we prove its completeness. We prove that our logic is strictly more expressive than other logics such as the logics cited above. By considering a probabilistic extension of CTL we show that this additional expressive power is really needed in some applications.     

Model checking probabilistic social commitments for intelligent agent communication

Interaction among autonomous agents in Multi-Agent Systems (MASs) is a key aspect for agents to coordinate with one another. Social approaches, as opposed to the mental approaches, have recently received a considerable attention in the area of agent communication. They exploit observable social commitments to develop a verifiable formal semantics through which communication protocols can be specified. Developing and implementing algorithmic model checking for social commitments have been recently addressed. However, model checking social commitments in the presence of uncertainty is yet to be investigated.In this paper, we propose a model checking technique for verifying social commitments in uncertain settings. Social commitments are specified in a modal logical language called Probabilistic Computation Tree Logic of Commitments (PCTLC). The modal logic PCTLC extends PCTL, the probabilistic extension of CTL, with modalities for commitments and their fulfillments. The proposed verification method is a reduction-based model checking technique to the model checking of PCTL. The technique is based upon a set of reduction rules that translate PCTLC formulae to PCTL formulae to take benefit of existing model checkers such as PRISM. Proofs that confirm the soundness of the reduction technique are presented. We also present rules that transform our new version of interpreted systems into models of Markov Decision Processes (MDPs) to be suitable for the PRISM tool. We implemented our approach on top of the PRISM model checker and verified some given properties for the Oblivious Transfer Protocol from the cryptography domain. Our simulation demonstrates the effectiveness of our approach in verifying and model checking social commitments in the presence of uncertainty. We believe that the proposed formal verification technique will advance the literature of social commitments in such a way that not only representing social commitments in uncertain settings is doable, but also verifying them in such settings becomes achievable.     

Multi-modal nonmonotonic logics of minimal knowledge

In this paper we introduce multi-modal logics of minimal knowledge. Such a family of logics constitutes the first proposal in the field of epistemic nonmonotonic logic in which the three following aspects are simultaneously addressed: (1) the possibility of formalizing multiple agents through multiple modal operators; (2) the possibility of using first-order quantification in the modal language; (3) the possibility of formalizing nonmonotonic reasoning abilities for the agents modeled, based on the principle of minimal knowledge. We illustrate the expressive capabilities of multi-modal logics of minimal knowledge to provide a formal semantics to peer-to-peer data integration systems, which constitute one of the most recent and complex architectures for distributed information systems.      

基于描述逻辑的组合知识库推理

由于知识库的定义不同,相近领域的知识库不能相互利用已有知识进行推理。为了联合不同的知识库进行推理,通过对描述逻辑的表现形式进行扩展提出一种组合描述逻辑,并基于概念的相似性将不同的领域概念进行关联,给出组合描述逻辑的语法及语义以及相应的Tableau算法。通过实例表明,组合描述逻辑可以利用已有知识进行推理;组合描述逻辑可以将不同的知识库进行结合,为借用不同知识库的知识进行推理提供一条新的途径。     

Uniform semantic treatment of default and autoepistemic logics

We revisit the issue of epistemological and semantic foundations for autoepistemic and default logics, two leading formalisms in nonmonotonic reasoning. We develop a general semantic approach to autoepistemic and default logics that is based on the notion of a belief pair and that exploits the lattice structure of the collection of all belief pairs. For each logic, we introduce a monotone operator on the lattice of belief pairs. We then show that a whole family of semantics can be defined in a systematic and principled way in terms of fixpoints of this operator (or as fixpoints of certain closely related operators). Our approach elucidates fundamental constructive principles in which agents form their belief sets, and leads to approximation semantics for autoepistemic and default logics. It also allows us to establish a precise one-to-one correspondence between the family of semantics for default logic and the family of semantics for autoepistemic logic. The correspondence exploits the modal interpretation of a default proposed by Konolige. Our results establish conclusively that default logic can be viewed as a fragment of autoepistemic logic, a result that has been long anticipated. At the same time, they explain the source of the difficulty to formally relate the semantics of default extensions by Reiter and autoepistemic expansions by Moore. These two semantics occupy different locations in the corresponding families of semantics for default and autoepistemic logics.     

Multi-Agent Dynamic Logics with Informational Test

This paper investigates a family of logics for reasoning about the dynamic activities and informational attitudes of agents, namely the agents' beliefs and knowledge. The logics are based on a new formalisation and semantics of the test operator of propositional dynamic logic and a representation of actions which distinguishes abstract actions from concrete actions. The new test operator, called informational test, can be used to formalise the beliefs and knowledge of particular agents as dynamic modalities. This approach is consistent with the formalisation of the agents' beliefs and knowledge as K(D)45 and S5 modalities. Properties concerning informativeness, truthfulness and preservation of beliefs are proved for a derivative of the informational test operator. It is shown that common belief and common knowledge can be expressed in the considered logics. This means, the logics are more expressive than propositional dynamic logic with an extra modality for belief or knowledge. The logics remain decidable and belong to 2EXPTIME. Versions of the considered logics express natural additional properties of beliefs or knowledge and interaction of beliefs or knowledge with actions. It is shown that a simulation of PDL can be constructed in one of these extensions.     

Stable and extension class theory for logic programs and default logics

The stable model semantics (cf. Gelfond and Lifschitz [1]) for logic programs suffers from the problem that programs may not always have stable models. Likewise, default theories suffer from the problem that they do not always have extensions. In such cases, both these formalisms for non-monotonic reasoning have an inadequate semantics. In this paper, we propose a novel idea-that of extension classes for default logics, and of stable classes for logic programs. It is shown that the extension class and stable class semantics extend the extension and stable model semantics respectively. This allows us to reason about inconsistent default theories, and about logic programs with inconsistent completions. Our work extends the results of Marek and Truszczynski [2] relating logic programming and default logics.