Crystallization kinetics and morphology of poly(butylene succinate)/poly(vinyl phenol) blend

Biodegradable crystalline poly(butylene succinate) (PBSU) can form miscible polymer blends with amorphous poly(vinyl phenol) (PVPh). The isothermal crystallization kinetics and morphology of neat and blended PBSU with PVPh were studied by differential scanning calorimetry (DSC), optical microscopy (OM), wide angle X-ray diffraction (WAXD), and small angle X-ray scattering (SAXS) in this work. The overall isothermal crystallization kinetics of neat and blended PBSU was studied with DSC in the crystallization temperature range of 80-88 °C and analyzed by applying the Avrami equation. It was found that blending with PVPh did not change the crystallization mechanism of PBSU, but reduced the crystallization rate compared with that of neat PBSU at the same crystallization temperature. The crystallization rate decreased with increasing crystallization temperature, while the crystallization mechanism did not change for both neat and blended PBSU irrespective of the crystallization temperature. The spherulitic morphology and growth were observed with hot stage OM in a wide crystallization temperature range of 75-100 °C. The spherulitic morphology of PBSU was influenced apparently by the crystallization temperature and the addition of PVPh. The linear spherulitic growth rate was measured and analyzed by the secondary nucleation theory. Through the Lauritzen-Hoffman equation, some parameters of neat and blended PBSU were derived and compared with each other including the nucleation parameter (K_g), the lateral surface free energy (σ), the end-surface free energy (σ_e), and the work of chain folding (q). Blending with PVPh decreased all the aforementioned parameters compared with those of neat PBSU; however, the decrease extent was limited. WAXD result showed that the crystal structure of PBSU was not modified after blending with PVPh. SAXS result showed that the long period of blended PBSU increased, possibly indicating that the amorphous PVPh might reside mainly in the interlamellar region of PBSU.     

Miscibility and crystallization of poly(ethylene succinate)/poly(vinyl phenol) blends

Miscibility of biodegradable poly(ethylene succinate) (PES)/poly(vinyl phenol) (PVPh) blends has been studied by differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) in this work. PES is found to be miscible with PVPh as shown by the existence of single composition dependent glass transition temperature over the entire composition range. Spherulitic morphology and the growth rates of neat and blended PES were investigated by optical microscopy (OM). Both neat and blended PES show a maximum growth rate value in the crystallization temperature range of 45-65 °C, with the growth rate of neat PES being higher than that of blended PES at the same crystallization temperature. The overall crystallization kinetics of neat and blended PES was also studied by DSC and analyzed by the Avrami equation at 60 and 65 °C. The crystallization rate decreases with increasing the temperature for both neat and blended PES. The crystallization rate of blended PES is lower than that of neat PES at the same crystallization temperature. However, the Avrami exponent n is almost the same despite the blend composition and crystallization temperature, indicating that the addition of PVPh does not change the crystallization mechanism of PES but only lowers the crystallization rate.     

Poly(hydroxybutyrate)/poly(butylene succinate) blends: miscibility and nonisothermal crystallization

Four blends of poly(hydroxybutyrate) (PHB) and poly(butylene succinate) (PBSU), both biodegradable semicrystalline polyesters, were prepared with the ratio of PHB/PBSU ranging from 80/20 to 20/80 by co-dissolving the two polyesters in N,N-dimethylformamide and casting the mixture. Differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) and optical microscopy (OM) were used to probe the miscibility of PHB/PBSU blends. Experimental results indicated that PHB showed some limited miscibility with PBSU for PHB/PBSU 20/80 blend as evidenced by the small change in the glass transition temperature and the depression of the equilibrium melting point temperature of the high melting point component PHB. However, PHB showed immiscibility with PBSU for the other three blends as shown by the existence of unchanged composition independent glass transition temperature and the biphasic melt. Nonisothermal crystallization of PHB/PBSU blends was investigated by DSC using various cooling rates from 2.5 to 10 °C/min. During the nonisothermal crystallization, despite the cooling rates used two crystallization peak temperatures were found for PHB/PBSU 40/60 and 60/40 blends, corresponding to the crystallization of PHB and PBSU, respectively, whereas only one crystallization peak temperature was observed for PHB/PBSU 80/20 and 20/80 blends. However, it was found that after the nonisothermal crystallization the crystals of PHB and PBSU actually co-existed in PHB/PBSU 80/20 and 20/80 blends from the two melting endotherms observed in the subsequent DSC melting traces, corresponding to the melting of PHB and PBSU crystals, respectively. The subsequent melting behavior was also studied after the nonisothermal crystallization. In some cases, double melting behavior was found for both PHB and PBSU, which was influenced by the cooling rates used and the blend composition.     

Miscibility and crystallization behavior of biodegradable blends of two aliphatic polyesters. Poly(butylene succinate) and Poly(ε-caprolactone)

Poly(butylene succinate) (PBSU) and poly(ε-caprolactone) (PCL) blends, both biodegradable chemosynthetic semicrystalline polyesters, were prepared with the ratio of PBSU/PCL ranging from 80/20 to 20/80 by co-dissolving the two polyesters in chloroform and casting the mixture. The miscibility and crystallization behavior of PBSU/PCL blends were investigated by differential scanning calorimetry and optical microscopy. Experimental results indicated that PBSU was immiscible with PCL as evidenced by the composition independent glass transition temperature and the biphasic melt. However, during the crystallization from the melt at a given cooling rate, the crystallization peak temperature of PBSU in the blends decreased slightly with the increase of PCL, while that of PCL in the blends first increased and then decreased with the increase of PBSU. Moreover, both the crystallization peak temperature of PBSU and PCL shifted to the low temperature range with the increase of the cooling rate for a given blend composition. Double melting peaks or one main melting peak with a shoulder were found for both PBSU and PCL after the complete crystallization cooled from the melt, and were ascribed to the melting-recrystallization mechanism. It was found that the subsequent melting behavior of PBSU/PCL blends was influenced apparently by the blend composition and the cooling rate used.     

PET/PTT合金非等温结晶行为的研究

采用差示扫描量热仪对熔融共混制备的聚对苯二甲酸乙二醇酯（PET）/聚对苯二甲酸丙二醇酯（PTT）合金的非等温结晶行为进行研究。结果表明,在相同的降温速率时, 随着PTT含量的增加,PET/PTT合金结晶峰温度向低温方向移动,而且当合金中PET与PTT含量接近时,合金样品出现了双重结晶峰;在降温结晶的过程中,随着降温速率的增大,各合金样品结晶峰温度均降低,其结晶峰均宽化;采用Jeziorny法对上述非等温结晶过程进行了分析,分析结果表明,随着降温速率的增大,各合金样品非等温结晶速率常数增加,其Avrami指数在1~5之间,并且逐渐减小。     

Crystallization kinetics and morphology of poly(ethylene suberate)

The crystallization kinetics and morphology of poly(ethylene suberate) (PESub) were studied in detail with differential scanning calorimetry, polarized optical microscopy, and wide‐angle X‐ray diffraction. The Avrami equation could describe the overall isothermal melt crystallization kinetics of PESub at different crystallization temperatures; moreover, the overall crystallization rate of PESub decreased with increasing crystallization temperature. The equilibrium melting point of PESub was determined to be 70.8°C. Ring‐banded spherulites and a crystallization regime II to III transition were found for PESub. The Tobin equation could describe the nonisothermal melt crystallization kinetics of PESub at different cooling rates, while the Ozawa equation failed. © 2015 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2016 , 133, 43086.     

Nonisothermal crystallization kinetics of polyamide 6 and ethylene‐co‐butyl acrylate blends

The nonisothermal melt‐crystallization behavior of PA6 and EBA blends at varying EBA content was investigated using differential scanning calorimetry at different scanning rates. Several macrokinetic models such as Avrami, Jeziorny, Ozawa, Liu, Ziabicki, and Tobin were applied to analyze the crystallization behavior thoroughly under nonisothermal conditions. The Avrami and Tobin model predicted that, for pure PA6 and PA6/EBA blends, simultaneous growth of all forms of crystal structures such as fibrillar, disc‐like, and spherulitic proceeds at an increasing nucleation rate. However, when applied to blends for isothermal crystallization, the Avrami model predicted that the crystallization process is diffusion‐controlled for pure PA6 and PA6/EBA blend containing higher content of EBA (50 phr), where the nylon‐6 chains were able to diffuse freely to crystallize under isothermal conditions. Liu model predicted that, at unit crystallization time, a higher cooling rate should be used to obtain a higher degree of crystallinity for both PA6 and PA6/EBA blends. The kinetic crystallizability of PA6 in the blends calculated using Ziabicki's approach varies depending upon the nucleation density and PA6‐rich regions present in the blend compositions. Nucleation activity of the blends estimated by Dobreva and Gutzowa method reveals that the EBA particles are inert at lower concentrations of EBA and do not act as nucleating agent for PA6 molecules in the blends. The activation energy of nonisothermal crystallization, calculated using Augis–Bennett, Kissinger, and Takhor methods indicated that the activation energy is slightly lower for the blends when compared to the neat PA6. © 2007 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci, 2008     

Miscibility and crystallization behaviour of biodegradable blends of two aliphatic polyesters. Poly(3-hydroxybutyrate-co-hydroxyvalerate) and poly(butylene succinate) blends

Blends of poly(3-hydroxybutyrate-co-hydroxyvalerate) (PHBV) and poly(butylene succinate) (PBSU), both biodegradable semicrystalline polyesters, were prepared with the ratio of PHBV/PBSU ranging from 80/20 to 20/80 by co-dissolving the two polyesters in chloroform and casting the mixture. Differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) and optical microscopy (OM) were used to study the miscibility and crystallization behaviour of PHBV/PBSU blends. Experimental results indicate that PHBV is immiscible with PBSU as shown by the almost unchanged glass transition temperature and the biphasic melt. Crystallization of PHBV/PBSU blends was studied by DSC using two-step crystallization and analyzed by the Avrami equation. The crystallization rate of PHBV decreases with the increase of PBSU in the blends while the crystallization mechanism does not change. In the case of the isothermal crystallization of PBSU, the crystallization mechanism does not change. The crystallization rate of PBSU in the blends is lower than that of neat PBSU; however, the change in the crystallization rate of PBSU was not so big in the blends. The different content of the PHBV in the blends does not make a significant difference in the crystallization rate of PBSU.     

Miscibility and crystallization behaviors of biodegradable poly(butylene succinate‐co‐butylene terephthalate)/phenoxy blends

Miscibility and crystallization behaviors of biodegradable poly(butylene succinate‐co‐butylene terephthalate) (PBST)/poly(hydroxyl ether biphenyl A) (phenoxy) blends were investigated with various techniques in this work. PBST and phenoxy are completely miscible as evidenced by the single composition‐dependent glass transition temperature over the entire blend compositions. Nonisothermal melt crystallization peak temperature is higher in neat PBST than in the blends at a given cooling rate. Isothermal melt crystallization kinetics of neat and blended PBST was studied and analyzed by the Avrami equation. The overall crystallization rate of PBST decreases with increasing crystallization temperature and the phenoxy content in the PBST/phenoxy blends; however, the crystallization mechanism of PBST does not change. Moreover, blending with phenoxy does not modify the crystal structure but reduces the crystallinity degree of PBST in the PBST/phenoxy blends. © 2011 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci, 2011     

Nonisothermal crystallization behavior and mechanical properties of poly(butylene succinate)/silica nanocomposites

Silica nanoparticles and poly(butylene succinate) (PBS) nanocomposites were prepared by a melt‐blending process. The influence of silica nanoparticles on the nonisothermal crystallization behavior, crystal structure, and mechanical properties of the PBS/silica nanocomposites was investigated. The crystallization peak temperature of the PBS/silica nanocomposites was higher than that of neat PBS at various cooling rates. The half‐time of crystallization decreased with increasing silica loading; this indicated the nucleating role of silica nanoparticles. The nonisothermal crystallization data were analyzed by the Ozawa, Avrami, and Mo methods. The validity of kinetics models on the nonisothermal crystallization process of the PBS/silica nanocomposites is discussed. The approach developed by Mo successfully described the nonisothermal crystallization process of the PBS and its nanocomposites. A study of the nucleation activity revealed that the silica nanoparticles had a good nucleation effect on PBS. The crystallization activation energy calculated by Kissinger's method increased with increasing silica content. The modulus and yield strength were enhanced with the addition of silica nanoparticles into the PBS matrix. © 2009 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci, 2010     

Investigation on the crystallization behavior of poly(ether ether ketone)/poly(phenylene sulfide) blends

The morphology of nonisothermally crystallized poly(phenylene sulfide) (PPS) and its blend with poly (ether ether ketone) (PEEK) have been observed by polarized optical microscope (POM) equipped with a hot stage. The nonisothermal crystallization behavior of PPS and PEEK/PPS blend has also been investigated by differential scanning calorimetry (DSC). The maximum crystallization temperature for PEEK/PPS blend is about 15°C higher than that of neat PPS, and the crystallization rate, characterized by half crystallization time, of the PEEK/PPS blend is also higher than that of the neat PPS. These results indicate that the PEEK acts as an effective nucleation agent and greatly accelerates the crystallization rate of PPS. The Ozawa model was used to analyze the nonisothermal crystallization kinetics of PPS and its blends. The Avrami exponent values of neat PPS are higher than that of its blend, which shows that the presence of PEEK changed the nucleation type of PPS from homogeneous nucleation to heterogeneous nucleation. © 2008 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci, 2008     

Nonisothermal melt crystallization kinetics of poly(ethylene terephthalate)/Barite nanocomposites

Poly(ethylene terephthalate) (PET)/Barite nanocomposites were prepared by direct melt compounding. The nonisothermal melt crystallization kinetics of pure PET and PET/Barite nanocomposites, containing unmodified Barite and surface‐modified Barite (SABarite), was investigated by differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) under different cooling rates. With the addition of barite nanoparticles, the crystallization peak became wider and shifted to higher temperature and the crystallization rate increased. Several analysis methods were used to describe the nonisothermal crystallization behavior of pure PET and its nanocomposites. The Jeziorny modification of the Avrami analysis was only valid for describing the early stage of crystallization but was not able to describe the later stage of PET crystallization. Also, the Ozawa method failed to describe the nonisothermal crystallization behavior of PET. A combined Avrami and Ozawa equation, developed by Liu, was used to more accurately model the nonisothermal crystallization kinetics of PET. The crystallization activation energies calculated by Kissinger, Takhor, and Augis‐Bennett models were comparable. The results reveal that the different interfacial interactions between matrix and nanoparticles are responsible for the disparate effect on the crystallization ability of PET. POLYM. COMPOS., 31:1504–1514, 2010. © 2009 Society of Plastics Engineers     

Crystallization behaviour of biodegradable poly(ethylene succinate) from the amorphous state

Nonisothermal and isothermal crystallization kinetics of biodegradable poly(ethylene succinate) (PES) from the amorphous state were studied by differential scanning calorimetry (DSC). For the nonisothermal crystallization, there were two crystallization exotherms upon heating from the amorphous state. One major crystallization exotherm located at low temperature corresponded to the real cold crystallization of PES, while the other minor one located at high temperature may correspond to the melt-recrystallization of the unstable crystals formed during the nonisothermal crystallization earlier. Several methods, such as Avrami equation, Tobin equation and Ozawa equation, were applied to describe the nonisothermal crystallization process of PES. Meanwhile, Avrami equation was also employed to study the isothermal crystallization of PES from the amorphous state. Similar to the nonisothermal crystallization the minor crystallization exotherm was also found in the DSC trace upon heating to the melt after the isothermal cold crystallization finished completely, and was attributed to the melt-recrystallization of the unstable crystals formed during the isothermal cold crystallization. Temperature modulated differential scanning calorimetry (TMDSC) was used in this work to investigate the origin of the minor crystallization exotherm located at high temperature, and the TMDSC experiments gave a direct evidence that the origin of the minor crystallization exotherm was from the melt-recrystallization of the originally existed unstable crystals formed through previous crystallization.     

Poly(butylene succinate)/poly(vinyl phenol) blends. Part 1. Miscibility and crystallization

Miscibility has been investigated in blends of poly(butylene succinate) (PBSU) and poly(vinyl phenol) (PVPh) by differential scanning calorimetry in this work. PBSU is miscible with PVPh as shown by the existence of single composition dependent glass transition temperature over the entire composition range. In addition, the polymer–polymer interaction parameter, obtained from the melting depression of PBSU using the Nishi–Wang equation, is composition dependent, and its value is always negative. This indicates that PBSU/PVPh blends are thermodynamically miscible in the melt. Preliminary morphology study of PBSU/PVPh blends was also studied by optical microscopy (OM). OM experiments show the spherulites of PBSU become larger with the PVPh content, indicative of a decrease in the nucleation density, and the coarseness of PBSU spherulites increases too with increasing the PVPh content in the blends.     

Miscibility and crystallization behavior of biodegradable poly(ε‐caprolactone)/tannic acid blends

Miscibility, isothermal melt crystallization kinetics, spherulitic morphology and growth rates, and crystal structure of completely biodegradable poly(ε‐caprolactone) (PCL)/tannic acid (TA) blends were studied by differential scanning calorimetry, polarized optical microscopy, and wide angle X‐ray diffraction in detail in this work. PCL and TA are miscible as evidenced by the single composition dependent glass transition temperature over the whole compositions range and the depression of equilibrium melting point of PCL in the PCL/TA blends. Isothermal melt crystallization kinetics of neat PCL and an 80/20 PCL/TA blend was investigated and analyzed by the Avrami equation. The overall crystallization rates of PCL decrease with increasing crystallization temperature for both neat PCL and the PCL/TA blend; moreover, the overall crystallization rate of PCL is slower in the PCL/TA blend than in neat PCL at a given crystallization temperature. However, the crystallization mechanism of PCL does not change despite crystallization temperature and the addition of TA. The spherulitic growth rates of PCL also decrease with increasing crystallization temperature for both neat PCL and the PCL/TA blend; moreover, blending with TA reduces the spherulitic growth rate of PCL in the PCL/TA blend. It is also found that the crystal structure of PCL is not modified in the PCL/TA blend. © 2011 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci, 2011     

Nonisothermal crystallization behavior of poly(aryl ether ether ketone)

A study has been made of the crystallization behavior of poly(aryl ether ether ketone), PEEK, under nonisothermal conditions. A differential scanning calorimeter (DSC) was used to monitor the energetics of the crystallization process from the melt. For nonisothermal studies, the melt was crystallized by cooling at rates from 1°C/min to 10°C/min. A kinetic analysis based on the recently proposed model for nonisothermal crystallization kinetics to remedy the drawback of the Ozawa equation was applied. The Avrami exponent for the nonisothermal crystallization process was strikingly different from that of the isothermal process, which indicates different crystallization behaviors. The results agree with the morphological observation reported in the literature. This study shows that correct interpretation of the Avrami exponent provides valuable information about the crystal structure and its morphology.     

Crystallization kinetics of poly(L‐lactide)/carbonated hydroxyapatite nanocomposite microspheres

Microspheres consisting of carbonated hydroxyapatite (CHAp) nanoparticles and poly(L ‐lactide) (PLLA) have been fabricated for use in the construction of osetoconductive bone tissue engineering scaffolds by selective laser sintering (SLS). In SLS, PLLA polymer melts and crystallizes. It is therefore necessary to study the crystallization kinetics of PLLA/CHAp nanocomposites. The effects of 10 wt% CHAp nanoparticles on the isothermal and nonisothermal crystallization behavior of PLLA matrix were studied, using neat PLLA for comparisons. The Avrami equation was successfully applied for the analysis of isothermal crystallization kinetics. Using the Lauritzen‐Hoffman theory, the transition temperature from crystallization Regime II to Regime III was found to be around 120°C for both neat PLLA and PLLA/CHAp nanocomposite. The combined Avrami‐Ozawa equation was used to analyze the nonisothermal crystallization process, and it was found that the Ozawa exponent was equal to the Avrami exponent for neat PLLA and PLLA/CHAp nanocomposite, respectively. The effective activation energy as a function of the relative crystallinity and temperature for neat PLLA and PLLA/CHAp nanocomposite under the nonisothermal crystallization condition was obtained by using the Friedman differential isoconversion method. The Lauritzen‐Hoffman parameters were also determined from the nonisothermal crystallization data by using the Vyazovkin‐Sbirrazzuoli equation. CHAp nanoparticles in the composite acted as an efficient nucleating agent, enhancing the nucleation rate but at the same time reducing the spherulite growth rate. This investigation has provided significant insights into the crystallization behavior of PLLA/CHAp nanocomposites, and the results obtained are very useful for making good quality PLLA/CHAp scaffolds through SLS. © 2009 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci, 2009     

Morphology,nonisothermal crystallization behavior,and kinetics of poly(phenylene sulfide)/polycarbonate blend

The morphology and nonisothermal crystallization behavior of blends made of poly(phenylene sulfide) (PPS), with a amorphous polycarbonate (PC) were studied. The blend is found to be partially miscible by the dynamic mechanical thermal analysis (DMTA) and melt rheological measurements. The nonisothermal crystallization behavior of blend was studied by differential scanning calorimetry (DSC). The results show clearly that the crystallization temperatures of PPS component in the blend decrease with increasing of PC contents. The crystallization kinetics was then analyzed by Avrami, Jeziorny, and Ozawa methods. It can be concluded that the addition of PC decreases the PPS overall crystallization rate because of the higher viscosity of PC and/or partial miscibility of blend, despite of small heterogeneous nucleation effect by the PC phase and/or phase interface. The results of the activation energy obtained by Kissinger method further confirm that the amorphous PC in the partial miscible PPS/PC blend may act as a crystallization inhibitor of PPS. © 2007 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 2007     

Morphology,structure, and kinetic analysis of nonisothermal cold‐ and melt‐crystallization of syndiotactic polystyrene

Nonisothermal cold‐ and melt‐crystallization of syndiotactic polystyrene (sPS) were carefully carried out by Perkin–Elmer Diamond differential scanning calorimetry, polarized optical microcopy (POM), and wide angle X‐ray diffraction. The experimental data subjected to the two types of processing were thoroughly analyzed on the basis of Avrami, Tobin, Ziabicki, and combination of Avrami and Ozawa models. Avrami, Tobin, and Ziabicki analyses indicate that nonisothermal cold‐crystallization (A) characterizes smaller Avami and Tobin exponent and larger Ziabicki kinetic crystallizability index G than those obtained from nonisothermal melt‐crystallization (B) possibly due to the existence of partially ordered structures in the quenched samples. Kissinger and the differential isoconversional method (DICM) of Friedman's were utilized to obtain effective energy barrier of A, in good agreement with that obtained by using Arrhenius equation to analyze the isothermal cold‐crystallization, indicating that Kissinger and Friedman equations can be applied to obtain activation energy from A of sPS. X‐ray diffraction analysis indicates that cold‐crystallization mainly produces α‐type crystal but for melt‐crystallization the contents of α‐type and β‐type crystals depend on the cooling rates. The POM also indicates the difference of end morphology of the sample between A and B. At the same time, the DICM of Friedman's was applied to analyze experimental data of B, which were divided into two groups with 20 K/min as the threshold, and it was found that the formation of β‐type crystal possesses larger absolute value of effective activation barrier than the formation of α‐type crystal. © 2006Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 103: 1311–1324, 2007