Nonisothermal crystallization kinetics of poly(butylene terephthalate)/multiwalled carbon nanotubes nanocomposites prepared by in situ polymerization

Poly(butylene terephthalate)/multiwalled carbon nanotubes (PBT/MWNT) nanocomposites were prepared by in situ ring‐opening polymerization of cyclic butylene terephthalate oligomers (CBT). The nonisothermal crystallization behavior of the neat PBT and the PBT/MWNT nanocomposites was analyzed quantitatively. The results reveal that the combined Avrami/Ozawa equation exhibits great advantages in describing the nonisothermal crystallization of PBT and its nanocomposites. The presence of MWNTs has the nucleation effect promoting crystallization rate for the nanocomposites, and the maximum one is observed in the nanocomposite having 0.75 wt % MWNT content. On the other hand, the addition of MWNTs has the impeding effect reducing the chain mobility and retarding crystallization, which is confirmed by the crystallization activation energies. However, the nucleation effect of MWNTs plays the dominant role in the crystallization of PBT/MWNT nanocomposites, in other words, the incorporation of MWNTs is increasing the crystallization rate of the nanocomposites. © 2014 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2014 , 131, 40849.     

Crystallization behavior of biodegradable poly(L‐lactide)/multiwalled carbon nanotubes nanocomposites from the amorphous state

Crystallization behavior of biodegradable poly(L ‐lactide) (PLLA) and its nanocomposites at different carboxyl‐functionalized multiwalled carbon nanotubes (f‐MWNTs) contents from the amorphous state was studied in detail in this work. For the isothermal cold crystallization, the presence of f‐MWNTs enhances the isothermal cold crystallization of PLLA in the nanocomposites compared with that of neat PLLA at the same crystallization temperature; moreover, the overall cold crystallization rate of PLLA increases with increasing the f‐MWNTs content in the PLLA matrix while the crystallization mechanism does not change. For the nonisothermal crystallization, the f‐MWNTs also accelerate the crystallization process of PLLA. In addition, the activation energies of nonisothermal cold crystallization process were calculated using both the Kissinger and Friedman methods. The cold crystallization activation energies of PLLA are higher in the nanocomposites than in neat PLLA, indicating that the addition of f‐MWNTs into the PLLA matrix acts as a physical hindrance to retard crystallization. POLYM. ENG. SCI., 2011. © 2011 Society of Plastics Engineers     

Crystallization kinetics of poly(L‐lactide)/carbonated hydroxyapatite nanocomposite microspheres

Microspheres consisting of carbonated hydroxyapatite (CHAp) nanoparticles and poly(L ‐lactide) (PLLA) have been fabricated for use in the construction of osetoconductive bone tissue engineering scaffolds by selective laser sintering (SLS). In SLS, PLLA polymer melts and crystallizes. It is therefore necessary to study the crystallization kinetics of PLLA/CHAp nanocomposites. The effects of 10 wt% CHAp nanoparticles on the isothermal and nonisothermal crystallization behavior of PLLA matrix were studied, using neat PLLA for comparisons. The Avrami equation was successfully applied for the analysis of isothermal crystallization kinetics. Using the Lauritzen‐Hoffman theory, the transition temperature from crystallization Regime II to Regime III was found to be around 120°C for both neat PLLA and PLLA/CHAp nanocomposite. The combined Avrami‐Ozawa equation was used to analyze the nonisothermal crystallization process, and it was found that the Ozawa exponent was equal to the Avrami exponent for neat PLLA and PLLA/CHAp nanocomposite, respectively. The effective activation energy as a function of the relative crystallinity and temperature for neat PLLA and PLLA/CHAp nanocomposite under the nonisothermal crystallization condition was obtained by using the Friedman differential isoconversion method. The Lauritzen‐Hoffman parameters were also determined from the nonisothermal crystallization data by using the Vyazovkin‐Sbirrazzuoli equation. CHAp nanoparticles in the composite acted as an efficient nucleating agent, enhancing the nucleation rate but at the same time reducing the spherulite growth rate. This investigation has provided significant insights into the crystallization behavior of PLLA/CHAp nanocomposites, and the results obtained are very useful for making good quality PLLA/CHAp scaffolds through SLS. © 2009 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci, 2009     

Isothermal and nonisothermal crystallization kinetics of MC nylon and polyazomethine/MC nylon composites

Crystallization kinetics of MC nylon (PA6) and polyazomethine (PAM)/MC nylon (PAM/PA6) both have been isothermally and nonisothermally investigated by different scanning calorimetry (DSC). Two stages of crystallization are observed, including primary crystallization and secondary crystallization. The Avrami equation and Mo's modified method can describe the primary stage of isothermal and nonisothermal crystallization of PA6 and PAM/PA6 composite, respectively. In the isothermal crystallization process, the values of the Avrami exponent are obtained, which range from 1.70 to 3.28, indicating an average contribution of simultaneous occurrence of various types of nucleation and growth of crystallization. The equilibrium melting point of PA6 is enhanced with the addition of a small amount of rigid rod polymer chains (PAM). In the nonisothermal crystallization process, we obtain a convenient method to analyze the nonisothermal crystallization kinetics of PA6 and PAM/PA6 composites by using Mo's method combined with the Avrami and Ozawa equations. In the meanwhile, the activation energies are determined to be ?306.62 and ?414.81 KJ/mol for PA6 and PAM/PA6 (5 wt %) composite in nonisothermal crystallization process from the Kissinger method. Analyzing the crystallization half‐time of isothermal and nonisothermal conditions, the over rate of crystallization is increased significantly in samples with a small content of PAM, which seems to result from the increased nucleation density due to the presence of PAM rigid rod chain polymer. © 2004 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 93: 2844–2855, 2004     

Calorimetric and rheokinetic analyses merged to capture crystallization kinetics in polyamide/clay nanocomposites: Revisiting predictability of models

Crystallization kinetics of polymer/clay systems was the subject of numerous investigations, but still there are some ambiguities in understanding thermal behavior of such systems under isothermal and nonisothermal circumstances. In this work, isothermal rheokinetic and nonisothermal calorimetric analyses are combined to demonstrate crystallization kinetics of polyamide6/nanoclay (PA6/NC) nanocomposites. As the main outcome of this work, we detected different regimes of crystallization and compared them by both isothermal dynamic rheometry and nonisothermal differential scanning calorimetry (DSC), which has not been simultaneously addressed yet. A novel analysis, somehow different from the common ones, is used to convert the storage modulus data to crystallinity values leading to more reasonable Avrami parameters in isothermal crystallization. It was found based on isothermal rheokinetic studies that increase of NC content and shear rate are responsible for erratic behavior of Avrami exponent and crystallization rates. Optimistically, however, isothermal crystallization by rheometer was confirmed by DSC. Nonisothermal calorimetric evaluations suggested an accelerated crystallization of PA6 upon increasing NC content and cooling rate. The crystallization behavior was quantified applying Ozawa (r² between 0.070 and 0.975), and combinatorial Avrami–Ozawa (r² between 0.984 and 0.998) models, where the latter appeared more appropriate for demonstration of nonisothermal crystallization of PA6/NC nanocomposites. © 2018 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2018 , 135, 46364.     

Isothermal crystallization kinetics and melting behavior of multiwalled carbon nanotubes/polyamide‐6 composites

Pristine and functionalized multiwalled carbon nanotubes (MWNTs) were used to fabricate polyamide 6 (PA6) composites through melt blending. The functionalized MWNTs were obtained by grafting 1,6‐hexamethylenediamine (HMD) onto the pristine MWNTs to improve their compatibility with PA6 matrix. The effect of MWNTs on the isothermal crystallization and melting behavior of PA6 was investigated by differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) and X‐ray diffraction (XRD). The Avrami and Lauritzen–Hoffmann equations are used to describe the isothermal crystallization kinetics. The values of the Avrami exponent found for neat PA6, the pristine MWNTs/PA6 and functionalized MWNTs/PA6 composite samples are about 4.0, 1.7, and 2.3, respectively. The activation energies are determined by the Arrhenius method, which is lower for the composites, ?320.52 KJ/mol for pristine MWNTs/PA6 and ?293.83 KJ/mol for functionalized MWNTs/PA6, than that for the neat PA6 (?284.71 KJ/mol). The following melting behavior reveals that all the isothermally crystallized samples exhibit triple melting endotherms at lower crystallization temperature and double melting endotherms at higher crystallization temperature. The multiple melting endotherms are mainly caused by the recrystallization of PA6 during heating. The resulting equilibrium melting temperature is lower for the composites than for neat PA6. In addition, polarizing microscopy (PLM) and small angle light scanning (SALS) were used to study the spherulite morphology. The results show that the MWNTs reduce the spherulite radius of PA6. This reduction is more significant for pristine MWNTs. © 2007 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 2007     

Crystallization behavior of poly(ε‐caprolactone)/layered double hydroxide nanocomposites

Poly(?‐caprolactone) (PCL)/layered double hydroxide (LDH) nanocomposites were prepared successfully via simple solution intercalation. The nonisothermal melt crystallization kinetics of neat PCL and its LDH nanocomposites was investigated with the Ozawa, Avrami, and combined Avrami–Ozawa methods. The Ozawa method failed to describe the crystallization kinetics of the studied systems. The Avrami method was found to be useful for describing the nonisothermal crystallization behavior, but the parameters in this method do not have explicit meaning for nonisothermal crystallization. The combined Avrami–Ozawa method explained the nonisothermal crystallization behavior of PCL and its LDH nanocomposites effectively. The kinetic results and polarized optical microscopy observations indicated that the addition of LDH could affect the mechanism of nucleation and growth of the PCL matrix. The Takhor model was used to analyze the activation energies of nonisothermal crystallization. © 2010 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci, 2010     

Isothermal and nonisothermal crystallization kinetics of a semicrystalline copolyterephthalamide based on poly(decamethylene terephthalamide)

The isothermal and nonisothermal crystallization kinetics of a semicrystalline copolyterephthalamide based on poly(decamethylene terephthalamide) (PA‐10T) was studied by differential scanning calorimetry. Several kinetic analyses were used to describe the crystallization process. The commonly used Avrami equation and the one modified by Jeziorny were used, respectively, to describe the primary stage of isothermal and nonisothermal crystallization. The Avrami exponent n was evaluated to be in the range of 2.36–2.67 for isothermal crystallization, and of 3.05–5.34 for nonisothermal crystallization. The Ozawa analysis failed to describe the nonisothermal crystallization behavior, whereas the Mo–Liu equation, a combination equation of Avrami and Ozawa formulas, successfully described the nonisothermal crystallization kinetics. In addition, the value of crystallization rate coefficient under nonisothermal crystallization conditions was calculated. © 2004 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 94: 819–826, 2004     

Effect of nano-nucleating agent addition on the isothermal and nonisothermal crystallization kinetics of isotactic polypropylene

Using differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) technique, a comparative study has been made of the isothermal and nonisothermal crystallization kinetics of nonnucleated isotactic polypropylene (iPP) and of nucleated iPP with 0.5 wt% of single-walled carbon nanotubes (SWCNTs) as a nucleating agent. The Avrami exponents (n) of iPP and nucleated iPP are close to 3.0 for isothermal crystallization. These results indicate that the addition of nucleating agents did not change the crystallization growth patterns of the neat polymer and that crystal growth was heterogeneous three-dimensional spherulitic. The results show that the addition of SWCNTs can shorten the crystallization half-time (t _1/2) and increase the crystallization rate of iPP. In the nonisothermal crystallization process, the Ozawa model failed to describe the crystallization behavior of nucleated iPP. The Cazé–Chuah model successfully described the nonisothermal crystallization process of iPP and its nanocomposite. A kinetic treatment based on the Ziabicki theory is presented to describe the kinetic crystallizability, in order to characterize the nonisothermal crystallization kinetics of iPP and nucleated iPP. Polarized light microscopy (PLM) experiments reveal that SWCNTs served as nucleating sites, resulting in a decrease of the spherulite size.     

Nonisothermal crystallization kinetics of high‐density polyethylene/barium sulfate nanocomposites

The high‐density polyethylene (HDPE)/barium sulfate (BaSO₄) nanocomposites had been successfully prepared by melt‐blending. Nonisothermal melt‐crystallization kinetics of neat HDPE and HDPE/BaSO₄ nanocomposites was investigated with differential scanning calorimetry under different cooling rates. The nonisothermal crystallization behavior was analyzed by Ozawa, Avrami, and combined Ozawa–Avrami methods. It was found that the Ozawa method failed to describe the nonisothermal crystallization behavior of neat HDPE and HDPE/BaSO₄ nanocomposites. The modified Avrami method by Jeziorny was only valid for describing the middle stage of crystallization but was not able to describe the later stage of neat HDPE and HDPE/BaSO₄ nanocomposites crystallization. The value of Avrami exponent n for neat HDPE ranged from 3.3 to 5.7 and for HDPE/BaSO₄ nanocomposites ranged from 1.8 to 2.5. It is postulated that the values of n close to 3 are caused by spherulitic crystal growth with heterogeneous nucleation, whereas simultaneous occurrence of spherulitic and lamellar crystal growth with heterogeneous nucleation account for lower values of n. The combined Ozawa–Avrami method by Mo and coworkers (Polym. Eng. Sci., 37(3) , 568 (1997)) was able to satisfactorily describe the crystallization behavior of neat HDPE and HDPE/BaSO₄ nanocomposites. In addition, the activation energy of nonisothermal crystallization was determined using the Kissinger (J. Res. Natl. Bur. Stand., 57(4) , 217 (1956)) method, showing that the crystallization activation energy of HDPE/BaSO₄ nanocomposites was lower than that of neat HDPE. POLYM. ENG. SCI., 2009. © 2009 Society of Plastics Engineers     

Nonisothermal crystallization kinetics of polyamide 6 and ethylene‐co‐butyl acrylate blends

The nonisothermal melt‐crystallization behavior of PA6 and EBA blends at varying EBA content was investigated using differential scanning calorimetry at different scanning rates. Several macrokinetic models such as Avrami, Jeziorny, Ozawa, Liu, Ziabicki, and Tobin were applied to analyze the crystallization behavior thoroughly under nonisothermal conditions. The Avrami and Tobin model predicted that, for pure PA6 and PA6/EBA blends, simultaneous growth of all forms of crystal structures such as fibrillar, disc‐like, and spherulitic proceeds at an increasing nucleation rate. However, when applied to blends for isothermal crystallization, the Avrami model predicted that the crystallization process is diffusion‐controlled for pure PA6 and PA6/EBA blend containing higher content of EBA (50 phr), where the nylon‐6 chains were able to diffuse freely to crystallize under isothermal conditions. Liu model predicted that, at unit crystallization time, a higher cooling rate should be used to obtain a higher degree of crystallinity for both PA6 and PA6/EBA blends. The kinetic crystallizability of PA6 in the blends calculated using Ziabicki's approach varies depending upon the nucleation density and PA6‐rich regions present in the blend compositions. Nucleation activity of the blends estimated by Dobreva and Gutzowa method reveals that the EBA particles are inert at lower concentrations of EBA and do not act as nucleating agent for PA6 molecules in the blends. The activation energy of nonisothermal crystallization, calculated using Augis–Bennett, Kissinger, and Takhor methods indicated that the activation energy is slightly lower for the blends when compared to the neat PA6. © 2007 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci, 2008     

Influence of nanofiller dimensionality on the crystallization behavior of HDPE/carbon nanocomposites

The isothermal and nonisothermal crystallization behavior of high density polyethylene (HDPE) containing various zero, one, and two dimensional (0‐D, 1‐D, and 2‐D) carbon nanofillers were investigated by means of differential scanning calorimetry. For a given temperature, the isothermal crystallization incubation time of HDPE became longer with the addition of lower dimensional carbon nanofillers, and the isothermal crystallization rate got slower. The values of Avrami and Tobin exponents indicated that the isothermal crystallization of HDPE followed two‐dimensional crystal growth in the presence of 2‐D and 1‐D carbon nanofillers, while exhibited three‐dimensional heterogeneous crystal growth in the presence of 0‐D carbon nanofillers. Contrary to the isothermal study, the nonisothermal crystallization of HDPE was accelerated in the presence of lower dimensional nanofillers. The nonisothermal crystallization data were finally analyzed using Ozawa and Mo methods. It was observed that only Mo approach could successfully describe the nonisothermal crystallization process of HDPE and HDPE/carbon nanocomposites. © 2012 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J. Appl. Polym. Sci., 2013     

Thermal and morphological characterization of composites prepared by solution crystallization method of high‐density polyethylene on carbon nanotubes

The morphology, nucleation, and crystallization of polyethylene/carbon nanotubes composites prepared by solution crystallization method of high density polyethylene on Multiwall Carbon Nanotubes (MWNTs) are studied. Transmission electron microscopy (TEM) results show that the center stems of MWNTs are decorated with lamellar crystals. The nonisothermal crystallization kinetics of pure PE and PE/MWNTs composites are investigated by differential scanning calorimetry at various cooling rates. It is found that the Avrami analysis modified by Jeziorny and Mo can describe the nonisothermal crystallization process of pure PE and PE/MWNTs very well. The difference in the value of exponent between PE and PE/MWNTs suggests that addition of the MWNTs influences the mechanism of nucleation and the growth of PE crystallites. On one hand, the increasing of temperature corresponding to the maximum rate of crystallization and the onset crystallization temperature and the study of the nucleation activity reveal that the inorganic component (MWNTs) can act as the nucleating agent to facilitate the crystallization of PE in the hybrids. On the other hand, the decreasing degree of crystallinity and the increasing of half‐crystallization time imply that the MWNTs networks confine the crystallization of PE. POLYM. COMPOS., 2010. © 2009 Society of Plastics Engineers     

Crystallization and thermal behavior of microcellular injection‐molded polyamide‐6 nanocomposites

This article presents the effects of nanoclay and supercritical nitrogen on the crystallization and thermal behavior of microcellular injection‐molded polyamide‐6 (PA6) nanocomposites with 5 and 7.5 wt% nanoclay. Differential scanning calorimetry (DSC), X‐ray diffractometry (XRD), and polarized optical microscopy (POM) were used to characterize the thermal behavior and crystalline structure. The isothermal and nonisothermal crystallization kinetics of neat resin and its corresponding nanocomposite samples were analyzed using the Avrami and Ozawa equations, respectively. The activation energies determined using the Arrhenius equation for isothermal crystallization and the Kissinger equation for nonisothermal crystallization were comparable. The specimen thickness had a significant influence on the nonisothermal crystallization especially at high scanning rates. Nanocomposites with an optimal amount of nanoclay possessed the highest crystallization rate and a higher level of nucleation activity. The nanoclay increased the magnitude of the activation energy but decreased the overall crystallinity. The dissolved SCF did not alter the crystalline structure significantly. In contrast with conventionally injection‐molded solid counterparts, microcellular neat resin parts and microcellular nanocomposite parts were found to have lower crystallinity in the core and higher crystallinity near the skin. POLYM. ENG. SCI., 46:904–918, 2006. © 2006 Society of Plastics Engineers     

Isothermal and nonisothermal crystallization kinetics of nylon-11

Analysis of the isothermal, and nonisothermal crystallization kinetics of Nylon-11 is carried out using differential scanning calorimetry. The Avrami equation and that modified by Jeziorny can describe the primary stage of isothermal and nonisothermal crystallization of Nylon-11. In the isothermal crystallization process, the mechanism of spherulitic nucleation and growth are discussed; the lateral and folding surface free energies determined from the Lauritzen–Hoffman equation are ς = 10.68 erg/cm² and ς_e = 110.62 erg/cm²; and the work of chain folding q = 7.61 Kcal/mol. In the nonisothermal crystallization process, Ozawa analysis failed to describe the crystallization behavior of Nylon-11. Combining the Avrami and Ozawa equations, we obtain a new and convenient method to analyze the nonisothermal crystallization kinetics of Nylon-11; in the meantime, the activation energies are determined to be −394.56 and 328.37 KJ/mol in isothermal and nonisothermal crystallization process from the Arrhonius form and the Kissinger method. © 1998 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 70: 2371–2380, 1998     

The effect of a sodium octacosanoate‐based nucleating agent on the crystallization of thermoplastic polyurethanes

Sodium octacosanoate (NaC_28‐32) is commonly used as a nucleating agent in polyester and polyamide formulations. In this work, the effect of adding this agent to three chemically identical thermoplastic polyurethanes (TPUs), but with distinct molecular weights, was addressed, focusing on the study of the crystallization phenomenon. The modified Avrami and Avrami‐Ozawa kinetic models were applied to the isothermal and non‐isothermal crystallization processes, respectively, and both indicated faster crystallization when the nucleating agent was used, with an increase in temperature and rate of crystallization of the TPU. Such effect was partly attributed to the formation of a larger number of crystallization nuclei in comparison to the neat TPU. Besides, the nucleating effect was more pronounced for the TPU with the lowest molecular weight (30,000 Dalton). The Avrami and Avrami‐Ozawa models indicated that the TPU crystallization process occurs with the development of two‐dimensional lamellar aggregates, axialites, and that the incorporation of thenucleating agent does not alter this geometry. POLYM. ENG. SCI., 2011. © 2011 Society of Plastics Engineers     

Crystallization and melting properties of poly(butylene succinate) composites with titanium dioxide nanotubes or hydroxyapatite nanorods

Poly (butylene succinate) (PBS) nanocomposites with titanium dioxide nanotubes (TNTs) or hydroxyapatite nanorods (HAP) were prepared, and the effect of the nano‐inorganics on the nonisothermal crystallization and melting properties of PBS were studied in detail by differential scanning calorimeter. The nonisothermal crystallization kinetics of PBS and its nanocomposites were analyzed by the Avrami, Ozawa, and Mo methods. It is found that the presence of TNTs increases the crystallization temperature and rate of PBS composites, but decreases the crystallization activation energy and crystallinity. By comparison, the crystallization rate of the PBS composite is decreased with the addition of HAP. The melting, recrystallization, and remelting mechanism results in the formation of two melting endothermic peaks during the melting process of neat PBS and its nanocomposites. The model proposed by Mo could successfully describe the nonisothermal crystallization process of PBS and its nanocomposites. At a given crystallinity, the F(t) values decrease in the order of PBS/HAP, PBS, and PBS/TNTs. © 2014 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2014 , 131, 40335.     

Nonisothermal crystallization behavior and mechanical properties of poly(butylene succinate)/silica nanocomposites

Silica nanoparticles and poly(butylene succinate) (PBS) nanocomposites were prepared by a melt‐blending process. The influence of silica nanoparticles on the nonisothermal crystallization behavior, crystal structure, and mechanical properties of the PBS/silica nanocomposites was investigated. The crystallization peak temperature of the PBS/silica nanocomposites was higher than that of neat PBS at various cooling rates. The half‐time of crystallization decreased with increasing silica loading; this indicated the nucleating role of silica nanoparticles. The nonisothermal crystallization data were analyzed by the Ozawa, Avrami, and Mo methods. The validity of kinetics models on the nonisothermal crystallization process of the PBS/silica nanocomposites is discussed. The approach developed by Mo successfully described the nonisothermal crystallization process of the PBS and its nanocomposites. A study of the nucleation activity revealed that the silica nanoparticles had a good nucleation effect on PBS. The crystallization activation energy calculated by Kissinger's method increased with increasing silica content. The modulus and yield strength were enhanced with the addition of silica nanoparticles into the PBS matrix. © 2009 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci, 2010