Comparison of ceftibuten once daily and amoxicillin-clavulanate three times daily in the treatment of acute exacerbations of chronic bronchitis

In medical practice, antibiotics are generally given empirically for the treatment of acute exacerbations of chronic bronchitis (AECB). To be effective, antibiotic therapy should be broad in spectrum, and it should also cover the common beta-lactamase-producing pathogens. In this multicenter, randomized, investigator-masked study, 469 patients with AECB were randomized (in a ratio of 2:1) to receive 400-mg oral ceftibuten capsules once daily or 500-mg amoxicillin-clavulanate tablets three times daily for 5 to 15 days. Patients receiving ceftibuten were further divided into those who took the capsule with a meal (fed) and those who took the capsule 1 hour before a meal (fasted). Clinical and microbiologic responses were evaluated after treatment at 0 to 6 days (end of treatment) and 7 to 21 days (follow-up). Overall clinical success was determined by cure/improvement of signs and symptoms of AECB at the end of treatment and at follow-up. Overall microbiologic assessment was graded as eradication, persistence, relapse, reinfection, colonization, superinfection, or unassessable. Tolerability was evaluated by grading observed adverse events. The mean duration of treatment was 10.4 days for patients who received ceftibuten and 10.1 days for patients who received amoxicillin-clavulanate. A total of 252 patients receiving ceftibuten and 117 patients receiving amoxicillin-clavulanate were evaluable for clinical efficacy, and 55 patients were evaluable for microbiologic response. Both treatments improved the signs and symptoms of bronchitis, and overall clinical success rates were equivalent for patients treated with ceftibuten (211 of 252 [84%]) and amoxicillin-clavulanate (93 of 117 [79%]) (95% confidence interval [CI], -4.5% to 13.6%). Overall microbiologic eradication rates were also similar for patients treated with ceftibuten (36 of 37 [97%]) and amoxicillin-clavulanate (12 of 14 [86%]) (95% CI, -5.2% to 21.2%). The most frequently reported treatment-related adverse events were gastrointestinal disturbances, which occurred in 15% (47 of 316) and 24% (36 of 152) of patients treated with ceftibuten and amoxicillin-clavulanate, respectively. No significant difference was observed in the ceftibutenfed and ceftibuten-fasted groups in overall clinical assessments of the clinical efficacy population and safety population. In conclusion, 400 mg oral ceftibuten once daily has a similar clinical success rate to 500 mg amoxicillin-clavulanate three times daily, with a trend toward fewer gastrointestinal side effects, in the treatment of patients with AECB.     

A single-blind, randomised, comparative study of clarithromycin and amoxycillin suspensions in the treatment of children with lower respiratory tract infections

One hundred and forty-five children with signs and symptoms of lower respiratory tract infections were entered into this multicentre, General Practice, investigator-blind study, designed to demonstrate equivalent efficacy between clarithromycin and amoxycillin suspensions. Seventy one children were randomised to treatment with clarithromycin suspension 7.5 mg/kg bodyweight twice daily and 74 to treatment with amoxycillin suspension 125 mg (bodyweight < 25 kg) or 250 mg (bodyweight > or = 25 kg) three times a day according to bodyweight. Duration of therapy was 5-10 days as determined by the investigator. Clinical evaluations were performed pretreatment, during treatment and post-treatment within 72 hours of cessation of therapy. Fifty two children in the clarithromycin group and 57 in the amoxycillin group were clinically evaluable. Both study medications were effective and there were no significant differences between the groups with respect to clinical cure rate (60% for clarithromycin and 63% for amoxycillin), clinical success rate (cure plus improvement, 96% for clarithromycin and 95% for amoxycillin) or rate of resolution of clinical signs and symptoms in clinically evaluable patients. The intention to treat analysis for all patients entered similarly showed no significant differences in efficacy. The two treatment groups did not differ significantly with respect to incidence or severity of adverse events which were generally mild and associated with the gastrointestinal system. Therapy was withdrawn because of adverse events in three children on clarithromycin and one on amoxycillin. Bacteriological cure rates could not be determined because of an insufficient number of evaluable pre-treatment sputum samples.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

Resistance to HIV protease inhibitors

OBJECTIVES: The efficacy and safety of levofloxacin and lomefloxacin in complicated urinary tract infections (UTIs) were compared in a randomized, open-label, multicenter study. METHODS: Outpatients were randomized to receive levofloxacin (250 mg once daily) for 7 to 10 days or lomefloxacin (400 mg once daily) for 14 days. Three hundred thirty-six patients (171 with levofloxacin, 165 with lomefloxacin) were evaluable for microbiologic efficacy, and 461 patients (232 with levofloxacin, 229 with lomefloxacin) for safety. RESULTS: The overall microbiologic eradication rate of pathogens was 95.5% (168 of 176) for levofloxacin and 91.7% (154 of 168) for lomefloxacin. Eradication rates with respect to patients were 95.3% (163 of 171) and 92.1% (152 of 165) for levofloxacin and lomefloxacin, respectively. At the 5 to 9-day post-therapy visit, symptoms were completely resolved in 84.8% of levofloxacin-treated patients and were decreased in 8.2% (93.0% clinical success). Among the lomefloxacin-treated patients, complete resolution was seen in 82.4%, with decreased symptoms in 6.1% (88.5% clinical success). Drug-related adverse events (AEs) were reported by 10 (2.6%) and 18 (5.2%) levofloxacin- and lomefloxacin-treated patients, respectively. Compared with levofloxacin-treated patients, more lomefloxacin-treated patients experienced photosensitivity reactions (3 [1.3%] versus 0) and dizziness (2 [0.9%] versus 0). Nausea (3 [1.3%] versus 1 [0.4%]) was more frequent in the levofloxacin-treated group. Six patients in each treatment group had a gastrointestinal AE (1.7%); rash was reported more frequently with lomefloxacin (4 patients [0.4%]) than with levofloxacin (1 patient [0.4%]). Discontinuation because of AEs was observed in 8 (3.4%) levofloxacin- and 14 (6.1%) lomefloxacin-treated patients. CONCLUSIONS: Once-daily levofloxacin is as effective as and has a superior tolerability profile than lomefloxacin in the treatment of complicated UTIs.     

Treatment of community-acquired acute uncomplicated urinary tract infection with sparfloxacin versus ofloxacin. The Sparfloxacin Multi Center UUTI Study Group

The efficacy and safety of a 3-day regimen of sparfloxacin were compared with those of a 3-day regimen of ofloxacin for the treatment of community-acquired acute uncomplicated urinary tract infections. Four hundred nineteen women were enrolled in a randomized, open-label, observer-blinded, multicenter study; 204 received sparfloxacin as a 400-mg loading dose on the first day and 200 mg once daily thereafter, and 215 received ofloxacin as 200 mg twice daily. A total of 383 patients met the criteria for clinical evaluability, and 174 were also bacteriologically evaluable; all treated patients were included in the safety analysis. Escherichia coli (86%) and Staphylococcus saprophyticus (4.6%) were the organisms most commonly isolated. Positive clinical responses were obtained 5 to 9 days after therapy in more than 92% of the patients in each group; sustained clinical cure rates 4 to 6 weeks after therapy were 78.3 and 76.9% in the sparfloxacin and ofloxacin groups, respectively. A positive bacteriologic response was observed in 98% of the bacteriologically evaluable patients in each treatment group at 5 to 9 days posttherapy and in 88.2 and 92.6% of the patients in the sparfloxacin and ofloxacin groups, respectively, 4 to 6 weeks after therapy. Almost 90% of all adverse events were of mild or moderate severity; the most frequent events at least possibly related to drug treatment were those common to the fluoroquinolones, namely, nausea, diarrhea, headache, insomnia, and photosensitivity. Photosensitivity was more frequent in the sparfloxacin group (6.9% versus 0.5% in the ofloxacin group); insomnia was more frequent in the ofloxacin group (3.7% versus 1.0% in the sparfloxacin group). These data suggest that a once-daily, 3-day regimen of sparfloxacin is effective and generally well tolerated in the treatment of acute uncomplicated urinary tract infections.     

Nasal and middle ear ciliary beat frequency in chronic suppurative otitis media

The middle ear mucociliary system has been shown to have an important function in the clearance of effusions. Little is known, however, about its role in chronic suppurative otitis media (CSOM). The ciliary beat frequencies of middle ear mucosal biopsies and nasal brushings of 27 patients with CSOM were analysed using a computerized photometric technique. The ciliary beat frequency in the middle ear mucosa was significantly less than that in nasal mucosa. Frequency in ears of smoking patients was significantly lower compared with non-smoking patients. Nasal brushings were taken from 27 otherwise healthy age and sex-matched non-smoking controls and the ciliary beat frequency was very similar to nasal samples from patients with CSOM. Ear controls were obtained from otosclerotic patients undergoing tympanotomy and the beat frequency was significantly higher than in the ear of patients with CSOM. It is concluded that middle ear ciliary function is significantly reduced in CSOM, particularly in patients who smoke.     

Interaction between bile salts and beta-adrenoceptor antagonists

Chronic suppurative otitis media (CSOM) in profoundly deaf patients is a contraindication for cochlear implantation. Eight (6%) of the 126 patients referred to cochlear implantation at this center between 1986 and 1992 became deafened as a result of bilateral CSOM but were otherwise suitable candidates. This study details the methods used in four patients to prepare the septic ear for a sterile device. Two patients had wet radical cavities with residual cholesteatoma, and two had discharging safe perforations resistant to surgical repair. Obliteration of the middle ear cleft with blind pit closure of the ear canal was attempted in all four patients, and cochlear implants were installed at a second operation 3 to 6 months later. The hearing results were as good as in implanted patients without CSOM, and the only complication has been the finding of a cholesteatoma pearl at the second operation in one patient. Fat obliteration of the mastoid and middle ear with blind pit closure of the ear canal can be adapted to make most chronic ears fit for implantation, if the patient is prepared to undergo two operations.     

A randomized comparative study on the safety and efficacy of clarithromycin and erythromycin in treating community-acquired pneumonia

BACKGROUND: Clarithromycin, a new macrolide, has distinct microbiological and pharmacokinetic advantages compared with erythromycin. This study was designed to compare the safety and efficacy of clarithromycin and erythromycin in the treatment of community-acquired pneumonia. METHODS: Forty adult patients, diagnosed with community-acquired pneumonia, were randomly arranged to received either clarithromycin 250 mg twice daily (20 patients) or erythromycin 500 mg four times daily (20 patients), over a period of 14 days each. RESULTS: There were no statistically significant differences between the two groups in terms of clinical cure (65% for clarithromycin, 65% for erythromycin), clinical success (clinical cure and improvement: 95% for clarithromycin, 90% for erythromycin) and radiological response (95% for clarithromycin, 90% for erythromycin). However, adverse effects, mainly gastrointestinal, were significantly higher among patients treated with erythromycin than among patients treated with clarithromycion (p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: These results demonstrate that clarithromycin 250 mg twice daily is at least as effective as erythromycin 500 mg four times daily for the treatment of community-acquired pneumonia, and is much better tolerated.     

DEFPARAM: a program package for aligning elliptical sections of biological objects containing an n-fold symmetry

BACKGROUND: Oesophageal candidiasis is the most common cause of oesophageal symptoms in patients with AIDS. Antifungal therapy, given as a suspension, may be better tolerated than capsules or tablets in children or patients with oesophageal symptoms. We performed a prospective study of the safety and efficacy of fluconazole suspension. METHODS: Patients with HIV infection; odynophagia, dysphagia, or retrosternal pain; endoscopic evidence of white plaques or exudate in the oesophagus; and microscopic confirmation of fungal infection on biopsy or brushing specimens were eligible. Patients received fluconazole oral suspension (200 mg loading dose followed by 100 mg q.d.s.). Therapy was continued for 2 weeks after symptom resolution. Repeat endoscopy was performed after completion of therapy. RESULTS: Forty-two patients enrolled in the study: 40 were male, mean (+/- s.e.) age was 37 +/- 2 years and mean CD4 cell count was 67 +/- 14/mm3. One patient was not evaluable because he received amphotericin during the first week of therapy. Symptoms resolved in all 41 evaluable patients; 17 (41%) had resolution by 1 week, 37 (90%) by 2 weeks, and 40 (98%) by 3 weeks. Endoscopic resolution occurred in 35 (95%) of 37 patients who underwent repeat endoscopy. Adverse events (skin rash in 1, nausea/vomiting in 2, elevated liver tests in 2) led to early termination of therapy in 5 patients, all of whom had clinical and endoscopic cure. CONCLUSIONS: Symptoms resolved in 100% of patients with AIDS and oesophageal candidiasis receiving an oral suspension of fluconazole, and 90% of patients had symptom resolution within 2 weeks. Determining whether the more rapid clinical cure in this study, compared with a previous trial which employed capsules, is related to an additional topical antifungal effect of the suspension, will require further study.     

Efficacy on supragingival plaque control of cetylpyridinium chloride in a slow-release dosage form

To evaluate the relative efficacy of a non-degradable osmotic slow-release dosage form containing 6.6 mg cetylpyridinium chloride (MOTS [Mucosal Oral Therapeutic System] CPC) to inhibit new plaque formation and gingivitis, a single-blind, randomised, parallel group pilot study was set up. 52 healthy volunteers were assigned to receive one of the following treatments for 18 days of non-brushing: holding 1 MOTS CPC 2 x daily for 2 h intra-orally, or rinsing 30 s with 15 ml Peridex 2 x daily, or dissolve Cepacol (each 1.6 mg CPC) lozenges 2 x daily unsupervised. Before the test period, the subjects received a thorough tooth cleaning followed by tooth polishing 1 x a week for 3 weeks to achieve clinical gingival health. After the start of therapy, the subjects were examined at day 4, 7 (+/- 2), 14 (+/- 2) and 18 (2 +/-). Relative efficacy was assessed by the modified Navy plaque index, the Quigley and Hein index, the planimetric plaque index, as well as the papillary marginal gingival index. There was an increase in both plaque formation and gingivitis over the 18 +/- 2 day period of nonbrushing for all subjects in the study. Peridex was the most effective in inhibiting plaque and gingivitis formation over that period of time. There was no difference between MOTS CPC and Cepacol at any time point in plaque accumulation and gingivitis intensity. Peridex was considered more convenient than MOTS CPC. Cepacol resulted in more staining at 18 days than MOTS CPC and Peridex.     

Meropenem versus cefuroxime plus gentamicin for treatment of serious infections in elderly patients

In this multicenter study, the efficacy of and tolerability for meropenem were compared with those for the combination of cefuroxime-gentamicin (+/- metronidazole) for the treatment of serious bacterial infections in patients > or = 65 years of age. A total of 79 patients were randomized; thirty-nine received meropenem (1 g/8 h), and 40 received cefuroxime (1.5 g/8 h) plus gentamicin (4 mg/kg of body weight daily) for 5 to 10 days. Metronidazole (500 mg/6 h) could be added to the cefuroxime-gentamicin regimen for the treatment of intra-abdominal infections (n = 10). Seventy patients were evaluable for clinical efficacy; the primary diagnoses were as follows: pneumonia in 41 patients (20 treated with meropenem, 21 treated with cefuroxime-gentamicin), intra-abdominal infection in 10 patients (7 meropenem, 3 cefuroxime-gentamicin-metronidazole), urinary tract infection (UTI) in 11 patients (6 meropenem, 5 cefuroxime-gentamicin), sepsis syndrome in 7 patients (4 meropenem, 3 cefuroxime-gentamicin), and "other" in 1 patient (cefuroxime-gentamicin). The pathogens isolated from 18 patients with bacteremia were as follows: Staphylococcus spp. (n = 2), Streptococcus spp. (n = 2), members of the family Enterobacteriaceae (n = 11), and Bacteroides spp. (n = 3). A satisfactory clinical response at the end of therapy was achieved in 26 of 37 (70%) and 24 of 33 (73%) evaluable patients treated with meropenem and combination therapy, respectively. Clinical success was achieved in 23 of 31 (74%) and 21 of 28 (75%) evaluable patients with infections other than UTIs, respectively. A satisfactory microbiological response occurred in 15 of 22 (68%) patients in the meropenem group compared with 12 of 19 (63%) treated with combination therapy. Renal failure occurred during therapy in 2 of 39 (5%) meropenem recipients compared with 5 of 40 (13%) of those treated with combination therapy. The findings in this small study indicate that meropenem is as efficacious for and as well tolerated by elderly patients as the combination of cefuroxime-gentamicin (+/- metronidazole).     

The effect of thoracic paravertebral blockade on intercostal somatosensory evoked potentials

Streptococcus pneumoniae strains have emerged that are resistant to penicillin (MICs >0.06 microg/mL) and many other beta-lactams. However, some older compounds such as amoxicillin have potency against these pneumococci with altered penicillin-binding proteins, but are labile to beta-lactamases produced by other prevalent respiratory tract pathogens. The interactions of amoxicillin with an enzyme-stable cephalosporin (cefixime) with a long elimination half-life were examined by the checkerboard dilution method versus 39 S. pneumoniae strains (13 resistant, 15 intermediate, and 11 susceptible to penicillin). Among 24 strains with evaluable drug interaction tests, 17 (71%) demonstrated partial or complete synergy. This favorable interaction produces a cefixime susceptibility category change from resistant or intermediate to susceptible for 16 of 28 strains (57%), when combined with < or = 1 microg/mL amoxicillin. Thus, the use of two currently available oral beta-lactams (amoxicillin twice a day + cefixime once a day; three total doses) appears to be a potential alternative treatment with greater spectrum for community-acquired respiratory tract infections pending clinical trial results.     

Surgical management of early-stage hypopharyngeal carcinoma

There is little consensus regarding the extent of surgical ablation that is needed to attain cure in early-stage hypopharyngeal carcinoma (HPC). To determine effective surgical management of early-stage HPC, we retrospectively reviewed all cases of stage I or stage II HPC treated at our institution between 1970 and 1992. Of 305 patients identified with HPC, 50 (16%) had stage I (N = 13) or stage II (N = 37) cancer at diagnosis. Thirty-seven of the 50 (74%) underwent surgery alone or combined with preoperative or postoperative radiotherapy (RT). Patients were divided into three surgical groups. Group 1 underwent partial pharyngectomy (N = 9), group 2 underwent total laryngectomy and partial pharyngectomy (N = 17), and group 3 underwent total laryngopharyngectomy with cervical esophagectomy and reconstruction (N = 11). Overall and disease-specific survivals were determined from Kaplan-Meier survival analysis. Disease-free 5-year survival in stage I and II HPCs was 40.1%. Univariate analysis showed a statistically significant decrease in survival for patients undergoing partial pharyngectomy when compared with those undergoing more extensive procedures (p < .03). This was confirmed with multivariate loglogistic regression analysis (p < .03) correcting for confounding variables of site and RT. These data suggest that wide resection improves disease-free survival in patients with early-stage HPC.     

A phase II/III trial of antimicrobial therapy with or without amikacin in the treatment of disseminated Mycobacterium avium infection in HIV-infected individuals. AIDS Clinical Trials Group Protocol 135 Study Team

OBJECTIVE: To determine the clinical and microbiologic benefit of adding amikacin to a four-drug oral regimen for treatment of disseminated Mycobacterium avium infection in HIV-infected patients. DESIGN: A randomized, open-labeled, comparative trial. SETTING: Outpatient clinics. PATIENTS: Seventy-four patients with HIV and symptomatic bacteremic M. avium infection. INTERVENTIONS: Rifampin 10 mg/kg daily, ciprofloxacin 500 mg twice daily, clofazimine 100 mg every day, and ethambutol 15 mg/kg orally daily for 24 weeks, with or without amikacin 10 mg/kg intravenously or intramuscularly 5 days weekly for the first 4 weeks. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Clinical and microbiologic response at 4 weeks; quantitative level of bacteremia with M. avium. RESULTS: No difference in clinical response was noted with the addition of amikacin to the four-drug oral regimen, and only 25% in either group had a complete or partial response at 4 weeks. A comparable quantitative decrease in bacteremia was noted in both treatment groups, with 16% of patients being culture-negative at 4 weeks and 38% at 12 weeks. Toxicities were mainly gastrointestinal. Amikacin was well tolerated. Median survival was 30 weeks in both groups. CONCLUSIONS: The addition of amikacin to a four-drug oral regimen of rifampin, ciprofloxacin, clofazimine, and ethambutol did not provide clinical or microbiologic benefit.     

Antimicrobial activity of ofloxacin against recent clinical isolates from otitis media and otitis externa]

In order to evaluate the annual changes of susceptibility, minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) of ofloxacin (OFLX) and 4 control drugs were determined against clinical isolates that were obtained from patients with otitis media and otitis externa during the periods between January and December 1993, and the periods between October 1996 and March 1997. The results are summarized as follows: 1. No annual changes were seen for MIC50 of OFLX, but MIC80 and MIC90 of that rose against methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA), coagulase-negative staphylococci (CNS) and Pseudomonas aeruginosa from 1993 to 1996. It appears that resistance to OFLX is increasing among these bacteria. Detection frequency of highly resistant strains to OFLX (MIC > 100 micrograms/ml) was lower than to other control drugs. 2. No annual changes were seen of MIC50, MIC80 and MIC90 of OFLX against methicillin-susceptible S. aureus (MSSA), Streptococcus spp., Proteus spp. and Haemophilus influenzae. OFLX showed strong antimicrobial activities against these bacteria. 3. Since there was no large annual changes in the antimicrobial activity of OFLX against clinical isolates that were obtained from patients with otitis media and otitis externa, OFLX otic solution was considered as one of the clinically useful drugs even now.     

A comparison of 2 weeks of terbinafine 250 mg/day with 4 weeks of itraconazole 100 mg/day in plantar-type tinea pedis

This double-blind, parallel group study compared a 2-week course of terbinafine 250 mg/day with a 4-week course of itraconazole 100 mg/day. A total of 190 patients were enrolled, of whom 129 were evaluable for efficacy. At week 8, 69% of patients treated with terbinafine were classified as effectively treated (mycological cure, and clinical assessment total score < or = 2) vs. 67% in the itraconazole group. At week 16, however, the rating for effective treatment increased to 71% of the terbinafine group, but decreased to 55% of the itraconazole group. This difference was of borderline statistical significance (P = 0.06). The results of this study demonstrate that both drugs can be used safely, and that 2 weeks' treatment with terbinafine 250 mg daily is as effective as 4 weeks' treatment with itraconazole 100 mg daily, but with fewer long-term relapses.     

Comparative effectiveness and safety of cefdinir and amoxicillin-clavulanate in treatment of acute community-acquired bacterial sinusitis. Cefdinir Sinusitis Study Group

Cefdinir is an extended-spectrum oral cephalosporin that is active against pathogens commonly seen in acute community-acquired bacterial sinusitis (ACABS), including Streptococcus pneumoniae, Haemophilus influenzae, and Moraxella catarrhalis. Two randomized, investigator-blind, multicenter trials (one in the United States and one in Europe) compared two dosage regimens of cefdinir (600 mg once a day for 10 days and 300 mg twice a day for 10 days) to amoxicillin-clavulanate (A-C) (500 mg three times a day for 10 days) for adult and adolescent patients with ACABS. Twelve hundred twenty-nine patients entered the U.S. study, 698 with antral puncture; 569 patients entered the European study, all with antral puncture. Clinical response (cure or improvement) was determined 7 to 14 days and 3 to 5 weeks posttherapy. Microbiologic eradication rates were determined 10 to 30 days posttherapy in a subset of patients who underwent pre- and posttherapy sinus aspirate culture. Rates of adverse events and treatment discontinuations due to adverse events were examined. Cefdinir, given once or twice daily, was as effective clinically (approximately 90% cure rate) as amoxicillin-clavulanate given three times daily in the treatment of ACABS. Microbiologic eradication rates were also similar in the three groups. The major side effect was mild diarrhea, occurring in approximately 20% of each group. Cefdinir caused fewer adverse events requiring treatment discontinuation.     

A new dosage regimen for topical application of ciprofloxacin in the management of chronic suppurative otitis media

The clinical and bacteriologic efficacy of topically applied ciprofloxacin was studied in 60 patients with chronic suppurative otitis media. Two hundred fifty and 125 microg/ml concentrations of ciprofloxacin solutions were given to two groups of patients. The duration of therapy was determined according to the clinical cure at follow-up. More than 21 days of therapy was not needed in any patient. The clinical cure rate with 250 microg/ml ciprofloxacin was 78.1% at 14 days and with 125 microg/ml it was 83.3%. However, a 100% clinical cure rate and complete bacteriologic eradication was obtained in 21 days in both groups. In each group only one patient had otomycosis by the fourteenth day of therapy, although ear discharge had ceased. It was concluded that 125 microg/ml ciprofloxacin could be applied as successfully as 250 microg/ml, and the duration of therapy had to be at least 14 days. This new dosage regimen can be adopted as an optimal dosage for ototopical application of ciprofloxacin in chronic suppurative otitis media. It will also obviously decrease the expense of therapy.     

Empiric treatment of hospital-acquired lower respiratory tract infections with meropenem or ceftazidime with tobramycin: a randomized study. Meropenem Lower Respiratory Infection Group

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy and tolerability of intravenous empiric treatment with meropenem compared with ceftazidime-tobramycin in patients with hospital-acquired lower respiratory tract infections. DESIGN: Prospective, nonblind, randomized trial. SETTING: Multicenter trial conducted at 22 centers. PATIENTS: Two hundred eleven patients were enrolled and 121 were evaluable for the analysis of both clinical and bacteriologic efficacy. INTERVENTIONS: One hundred four patients were randomized to receive intravenous meropenem (1000 mg) every 8 hrs and 107 patients were randomized to receive intravenous ceftazidime (2000 mg) plus tobramycin (1 mg/kg) every 8 hrs. Sixty-three meropenem-treated patients and 58 ceftazidime-tobramycin-treated patients were eligible for the analysis of clinical and bacteriologic efficacy. In the ceftazidime-tobramycin group, 32 (55%) evaluable patients received more than six doses of tobramycin, 24 (41%) received six doses or fewer, and two (3%) did not receive any tobramycin. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: The analysis of efficacy was based on the clinical and bacteriologic responses at the end of treatment. Satisfactory clinical responses occurred in 56 (89%) of 63 of the meropenem-treated patients and in 42 (72%) of 58 of the ceftazidime-tobramycin-treated patients (p = .04). Corresponding bacteriologic response rates were 89% and 67%, respectively (p = .006). The frequency and profile of drug-related adverse events was similar across treatment groups. Seizures were reported in three meropenem-treated patients, but these seizures were considered by the investigator to be unrelated to treatment. CONCLUSIONS: Meropenem is well tolerated and more efficacious than the combination of ceftazidime and tobramycin for the initial empiric treatment of hospital-acquired bacterial pneumonia.     

Prospective, randomised, multicentre study of meropenem versus imipenem/cilastatin as empiric monotherapy in severe nosocomial infections

The clinical and bacteriological efficacy and the tolerability of meropenem versus imipenem/cilastatin (both 1 g t.i.d.) in severe nosocomial infections were compared in a multicentre, randomised, nonblinded study. A total of 151 patients were recruited; 133 (66 meropenem, 67 imipenem/cilastatin) were clinically evaluable and 84 (42 meropenem, 42 imipenem/cilastatin) bacteriologically evaluable. Most clinically evaluable patients (90%) were in intensive care units, required mechanical ventilation (72%), and had received previous antibiotic therapy (62%). The mean (+/- SD) APACHE II score was 15.2 (+/- 6.6) in the meropenem group and 17.8 (+/- 6.8) in the imipenem/cilastatin group. The primary infections were nosocomial lower respiratory tract infections (56% of patients), intra-abdominal infections (15%), septicaemia (21%), skin/skin structure infections (5%), and complicated urinary tract infections (3%); 35% of the patients had two or more infections. There was no significant difference between the meropenem and imipenem/cilastatin groups in the rates of satisfactory clinical (weighted percentage 87% vs. 74%) or bacteriological (weighted percentage 79% vs. 71%) response. There was a slightly higher rate of clinical success with meropenem against primary or secondary lower respiratory tract infection (89% vs. 76%). Drug-related adverse events occurred in 17% and 15% of meropenem and imipenem/cilastatin patients, respectively. Meropenem (1 g t.i.d.) was as efficacious as the same dose of imipenem/cilastatin in this setting, and both drugs were well tolerated.