Forearm torque strengths and discomfort profiles in pronation and supination

This experiment investigated maximum forearm pronation and supination torques and forearm discomfort, for intermittent torque exertions in supine and prone forearm angles for the right arm. Twenty-two subjects participated in the study that comprised two parts, the first of which involved measurement of maximum forearm torque in both twisting directions at five forearm angles including neutral. This was followed by endurance tests at 50% maximum voluntary contraction (MVC) in both directions. The second part of the study involved subjects performing 5-min duration of intermittent isometric torque exercises at 20% MVC in both directions at 11 forearm angles. Regression equations were developed that accurately predict torques as a function of forearm angle expressed as a percentage of maximum motion. Analysis of the discomfort data for the intermittent isometric torque exertions indicated that both forearm angle and twisting direction significantly affected forearm discomfort (p?<?0.001). A significant two-way interaction (p?<?0.01) was identified between forearm angle and direction for supine forearm angles only. The results provide important strength and discomfort models for the design of tasks involving static or repetitive forearm twisting. Such tasks have a strong association with forearm injuries including lateral and medial epicondylitis. These results provide needed data on the risk factors associated with these injuries so they can be prevented.     

Maximum isometric trunk muscle strength and activity at trunk axial rotation during sitting

This study was performed to provide information relating to the twisted posture being characteristic of the driver of an agricultural tractor working in the field. The relationship of trunk axial strength and muscle activity to trunk twisting angle of prerotation was determined and quantified. Differences between tractor drivers and office workers, and between the two directions of twisting action were also studied. Nine male tractor drivers and nine male office workers performed isometric maximum efforts at about −40, −20, 0, 20 and 40° of pre-set trunk twisting angles in both the clockwise and counterclockwise directions. Exerted torque, true angle of prerotation and muscle activity from left and right side of each of obliquus externus, rectus abdominis and erector spinae were measured simultaneously. The results showed that the subjects could exert the greatest torques when being prerotated in the opposite direction and the lowest torques when being prerotated in the same direction to the direction of exertion. The exerted torques were within the range of 65 – 145 Nm. There were large differences in obliquus externus and erector spinae activity due to the twisting direction. There were also changes in muscle activity from obliquus externus and rectus abdominis due to prerotation angle. The results raised questions concerning the involvement of the passive tissues and the use of deeper muscles during trunk axial rotation, which should be further investigated.     

Upper limb discomfort profile due to intermittent isometric pronation torque at different postural combinations of the shoulder-arm system

Twenty-seven right-handed male university students participated in this study, which comprised a full factorial model consisting of three forearm rotation angles (60% prone and supine and neutral range of motion), three elbow angles (45°, 90° and 135°), three upper arm angles (45° flexion/extension and neutral), one exertion frequency (15 per min) and one level of pronation torque (20% maximum voluntary contraction (MVC) relative to MVC at each articulation). Discomfort rating after the end of each 5 min treatment was recorded on a visual analogue scale. Results of a repeated measures analysis of covariance on discomfort score, with torque endurance time as covariate, indicated that none of the factors was significant including torque endurance time (p = 0.153). An initial data collection phase preceded the main experiment in order to ensure that participants exerted exactly 20% MVC of the particular articulation. In this phase MVC pronation torque was measured at each articulation. The data revealed a significant forearm rotation angle effect (p = 0.001) and participant effect (p = 0.001). Of the two-way interactions, elbow?participant (p = 0.004), forearm?participant (p = 0.001) and upper arm?participant (p = 0.005) were the significant factors. Electromyographic activity of the pronator teres and biceps brachii muscles revealed no significant change in muscle activity in most of the articulations. Industrial jobs involving deviated upper arm postures are typical in industry but have a strong association with injury. Data from this study will enable better understanding of the effects of deviated upper arm postures on musculoskeletal disorders and can also be used to identify and control high-risk tasks in industry.     

Effects of combined wrist flexion/extension and forearm rotation and two levels of relative force on discomfort

This study investigated perceived discomfort in an isometric wrist flexion task. Independent variables were wrist flexion/extension (55%, 35% flexion, neutral, 35% and 55% extension ranges of motion (ROM)), forearm rotation (60%, 30% prone, neutral, 30% and 60% supine ROM) and two levels of flexion force (10% and 20% maximum voluntary contraction (MVC)). Discomfort was significantly affected by flexion force, forearm rotation and a two-way interaction of force with forearm rotation (each p < 0.05). High force for 60%ROM forearm pronation and supination resulted in increasingly higher discomfort for these combinations. Flexion forces were set relative to the MVC in each wrist posture and this appears to be important in explaining a lack of significant effect (p = 0.34) for flexion/extension on discomfort. Regression equations predicting discomfort were developed and used to generate iso-discomfort contours, which indicate regions where the risk of injury should be low and others where it is likely to be high. Regression equations predicting discomfort and iso-discomfort contours are presented, which indicate combinations of upper limb postures for which discomfort is predicted to be low, and others where it is likely to be high. These are helpful in the study of limits for risk factors associated with upper limb musculoskeletal injury in industry.     

Inward torque and high-friction handles can reduce required muscle efforts for torque generation

OBJECTIVE: The effects of handle friction and torque direction on muscle activity and torque are empirically investigated using cylindrical handles. BACKGROUND: A torque biomechanical model that considers contact force, friction, and torque direction was evaluated using different friction handles. METHODS: Twelve adults exerted hand torque in opposite directions about the long axis of a cylinder covered with aluminum or rubber while grip force, torque, and finger flexor electromyography (EMG) were recorded. In addition, participants performed grip exertions without torque, in which they matched the EMG level obtained during previous maximum torque exertions, to allow us to determine how grip force was affected by the absence of torque. RESULTS: (a) Maximum torque was 52% greater for the high-friction rubber handle than for the low-friction aluminum handle. (b) Total normal force increased 33% with inward torque (torque applied in the direction fingertips point) and decreased 14% with outward torque (torque in the direction the thumb points), compared with that with no torque. Consequently, maximum inward torque was 45% greater than maximum outward torque. (c) The effect of torque direction was greater for the high-friction rubber handle than for the low-friction aluminum handle. CONCLUSION: The results support the proposed model, which predicts a large effect of torque direction when high-friction handles are gripped. APPLICATION: Designing tasks with high friction and inward rotations can increase the torque capability of workers of a given strength, or reduce required muscle activities for given torque exertions, thus reducing the risk of fatigue and musculoskeletal disorders.     

The interacting effects of forearm rotation and exertion direction on male and female wrist strength

The accurate estimation of wrist strength is an important component of ergonomics task evaluation, as a vast majority of occupational tasks involve use of the hands to generate forces and moments. The purpose of this study was to examine the interacting effects of forearm rotation (pronation/supination) and wrist exertion direction on strength at the wrist joint in males and females. A total of 24 male and female participants performed maximum isometric wrist exertions while maintaining a non-deviated wrist posture (no flexion/extension or radial/ulnar deviation) and an open hand. Maximum wrist moments were obtained in combinations of three forearm rotations (90° pronation, neutral, 90° supination) and four exertion directions (flexion, extension, radial and ulnar deviation). A greater effect of forearm rotation was observed for males, as strength in the neutral forearm posture was significantly different than pronated and supinated postures in 5 of 8 comparisons. For females, both wrist flexion and extension strengths were higher in neutral, compared to supinated forearm postures. The findings of this study suggest that wrist strength does depend on forearm rotation, and this interaction between axes needs to be accounted for in future strength capability estimates.Relevance to industryThis study shows that wrist strength estimates, currently used by ergonomics software packages in industry, can be improved to more accurately reflect the actual wrist strength capabilities of workers during hand-intensive tasks.     

Effect of elliptic handle shape on grasping strategies, grip force distribution, and twisting ability

A generic torque model for various handle shapes has been developed and evaluated using experimental data. Twelve subjects performed maximum isometric torques using circular and elliptic cylinders in medium and large sizes (circular: r = 25.4, 38.1 mm; elliptic: semi-major/minor axes = 30.9/19.3, 47.1/27.8 mm) finished with aluminium and rubber, in two opposite directions. Torque, grip force distribution, and finger position were recorded. Maximum torques were 25%, 7%, and 31% greater for the elliptic, large-size, and rubber-finished cylinders than for the circular, medium-size, and aluminium-finished cylinders, respectively. Greater torque for the elliptic cylinders was associated with 58% greater normal force that the subjects could generate for the elliptic than circular cylinders. The model suggests that greater torques for the large-size and rubber cylinders are related to long moment arms and greater frictional coupling at the hand-cylinder interface, respectively. Subjects positioned their hands differently depending on torque direction to maximise their normal force and torque generation. STATEMENT OF RELEVANCE: Desirable handle features for torque generation may be different from those for grip only. Design of handles per advantageous handle features (e.g., shape, size, and surface) may help increase people's torque strength and contribute to increased physical capacity of people.     

Force capability differences due to gloves

There are many tasks in the industrial environment, involving the use of the hands, for which gloves are required or voluntarily used by many workers. When an individual grasps a handle in attempting to exert short-term maximum force his/ her capability is influenced by the use of gloves.

The purpose of this investigation was to determine the influence of a single glove and a double glove on handle forces generated by individuals. Thirty male volunteers were used as subjects. The maximum pull force, maximum push force, maximum wrist flexion torque and maximum wrist extension torque were measured under the condition of a slippery handle. These exertions of the subject's dominant hand were measured while using no glove, one glove and two gloves. Results indicated that the one-glove condition was superior to the conditions of no glove or double gloves for the forces and torques measured     

Effects of combined wrist deviation and forearm rotation on discomfort score

The aim of the study was to examine the pattern of the change in discomfort for combined wrist deviation and forearm rotation as joint angles increased away from neutral in a repetitive task. There were five levels of wrist deviation (neutral, 35% and 55% of the range of motion (ROM) in radial and ulnar deviation) and five levels of forearm rotation (neutral, 30% and 60% of the ROM in pronation and supination). Twenty-five participants performed a repetitive flexion task with a force of 10 N +/- 1 N at a frequency of 15 exertions per min, with replication after 1 week for six of the participants. A visual analogue scale was used for recording the discomfort scores. Repeated measures analysis of covariance with the Greenhouse-Geisser correction, where necessary, was used on transformed values of the discomfort scores. Grip test endurance time at 50% of maximum voluntary contraction was included as a covariate. Wrist deviation (p = 0.007) and forearm rotation (p = 0.001) were found to have significant effects. Interactions of the main factors were not significant and nor was the covariate. Quadratic regression equations were derived and were used to generate iso-discomfort contours, which show a useful area of low discomfort around the central neutral zone of wrist postures, but with steep increases in discomfort at the extreme combinations of wrist ulnar/radial deviation with forearm pronation/supination. Discomfort equations and contours, showing wrist and forearm postures, which are either acceptable or potentially injurious, are useful for the design of industrial tools, machine controls and workspaces. Reference to these can help to reduce the risk of musculoskeletal injury associated with the tasks or tools by avoiding poor postures with unacceptable deviations from neutral posture.     

The effect of handle friction and inward or outward torque on maximum axial push force

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the relationship among friction, applied torque, and axial push force on cylindrical handles. BACKGROUND: We have earlier demonstrated that participants can exert greater contact force and torque in an "inward" movement of the hand about the long axis of a gripped cylinder (wrist flexion/forearm supination) than they can in an "outward" hand movement. METHOD: Twelve healthy participants exerted anteriorly directed maximum push forces along the long axis of aluminum and rubber handles while applying deliberate inward or outward torques, no torque (straight), and an unspecified (preferred) torque. RESULTS: Axial push force was 12% greater for the rubber handle than for the aluminum handle. Participants exerted mean torques of 1.1, 0.3, 2.5, and -2.0 Nm and axial push forces of 94, 85, 75, and 65 N for the preferred, straight, inward, and outward trials, respectively. Left to decide for themselves, participants tended to apply inward torques, which were associated with increased axial push forces. CONCLUSION: Axial push force was limited by hand-handle coupling--not the whole body's push strength. Participants appeared to intuitively know that the application of an inward torque would improve their maximum axial push force. Axial push forces were least when a deliberate torque was requested, probably because high levels of torque exertions interfered with the push. APPLICATION: A low-friction handle decreases maximum axial push force. It should be anticipated that people will apply inward torque during maximum axial push.     

Muscle activity and range of motion during active trunk rotation in a sitting posture

Twisted trunk postures during tractor driving are associated with low-back pain. The purposes of this study were to quantify the muscle activity as a function of twisting angle, to quantify the range of motion (ROM) during active trunk rotation and to determine whether there were any differences between tractor drivers and office workers and between twisting direction for these variables. The subjects performed exertions in a seated position, twisting from the neutral position to the end of the ROM. The results showed that external oblique and erector spinae had significantly different activation patterns depending on twisting direction. For the contralateral external oblique and the ipsilateral erector spinae, the muscle effort required to twist the trunk was low up to about 20° twisting angle, then the muscle effort needed to twist the trunk increased progressively. No significant differences due to occupation or twisting direction were found. The result implies that work in twisted trunk postures might be a risk factor for low-back pain.     

Psychophysical study of six hand movements.

This study represents a continuation of a series of psychophysical studies on repetitive motions of the wrist and hand conducted at the Liberty Mutual Research Center for Safety and Health. The purpose of the study was to quantify maximum acceptable forces of six motions performed on separate days but within the context of the same experiment. The six motions were wrist flexion with a power grip, wrist extension with a power grip, wrist flexion with a pinch grip, wrist extension with a pinch grip, ulnar deviation with a power grip, and a handgrip task (with a power grip). A psychophysical methodology was used in which the subject adjusted the resistance on the handle and the experimenter manipulated or controlled all other variables. Thirty-one subjects performed the six tasks at repetition rates of 15, 20 and 25 motions/min. Subjects performed the tasks for 7 h per day, 5 days per week, for 4 weeks. The subjects were instructed to work as if they were on an incentive basis, getting paid for the amount of work performed. Symptoms were recorded by the subjects during the last 5 min of each hour. The results revealed that maximum acceptable torques ranged from 11 to 19% of maximum isometric torque depending on frequency and motion. Maximum acceptable torques for the tasks that could be compared with previous studies showed the same patterns of response. However, the selected forces were substantially lower using the mixed protocol. A table of maximum acceptable torques and forces is presented for application in the field.     

Psychophysical study of six hand movements

This study represents a continuation of a series of psychophysical studies on repetitive motions of the wrist and hand conducted at the Liberty Mutual Research Center for Safety and Health. The purpose of the study was to quantify maximum acceptable forces of six motions performed on separate days but within the context of the same experiment. The six motions were wrist flexion with a power grip, wrist extension with a power grip, wrist flexion with a pinch grip, wrist extension with a pinch grip, ulnar deviation with a power grip, and a handgrip task (with a power grip). A psychophysical methodology was used in which the subject adjusted the resistance on the handle and the experimenter manipulated or controlled all other variables. Thirty-one subjects performed the six tasks at repetition rates of 15, 20 and 25 motions/min. Subjects performed the tasks for 7 h per day, 5 days per week, for 4 weeks. The subjects were instructed to work as if they were on an incentive basis, getting paid for the amount of work performed. Symptoms were recorded by the subjects during the last 5 min of each hour. The results revealed that maximum acceptable torques ranged from 11 to 19% of maximum isometric torque depending on frequency and motion. Maximum acceptable torques for the tasks that could be compared with previous studies showed the same patterns of response. However, the selected forces were substantially lower using the mixed protocol. A table of maximum acceptable torques and forces is presented for application in the field.     

Shoulder muscle activity in off-axis pushing and pulling tasks

Workspace design can often dictate the muscular efforts required to perform work, impacting injury risk. Within many environments, industrial workers often use sub-maximal forces in offset directions in to accomplish job tasks. The purpose of this research was to develop methods to estimate shoulder muscle activation during seated, static, sub-maximal exertions in off-axis (non-cardinal) directions. Surface EMG signals were recorded from 14 upper extremity muscles in 20 right-handed university aged, right-handed males (age: 22 ± 3 years, weight: 77.5 ± 11.1 kg, height 179.0 ± 7.0 cm) participated in this study. Each participant performed 60 submaximal exertions (40N) directed at 4 off-axis phase angles of 45° (45°, 135°, 225°, and 315°) in 3 planes (frontal, sagittal, and transverse) in 5 hand locations within a right handed reach envelope. The influence of hand location and force direction on muscle activity was evaluated with a forced-entry stepwise regression model. The ability of previously published on-axis prediction equations to predict muscle activity during these off-axis exertions was also evaluated. Within each muscle, activity levels were affected by both hand location and three-dimensional force direction and activation levels ranged from <1 to 37 %MVE. For each force direction there were 75 predictive equations selected and used, and the specific equation that best predicted activation depended on the muscle, exertion direction and hand location evaluated. This work assists ergonomic workplace design to minimize muscle demands during commonly performed off-axis exertions. These estimated demands can be employed to improve workplace design to reduce workplace injuries and enhance worker productivity.     

A study of lifting tasks performed on laterally slanted ground surfaces

Lifting in most industrial environments is performed on a smooth, level ground surface. There are, however, many outdoor work environments (e.g. agriculture and construction) that require manual material handling activities on variable grade ground surfaces. Quantifying the biomechanical response while lifting under these conditions may provide insight into the aetiology of lifting-related injury. The aim of the current study was to quantify the effect of laterally slanted ground surfaces on the biomechanical response. Ten subjects performed both isometric weight-holding tasks and dynamic lifting exertions (both using a 40% of max load) while standing on a platform that was laterally tilted at 0, 10, 20 and 30 degrees from horizontal. As the subject performed the isometric exertions, the electromyographic (EMG) activity of trunk extensors and knee extensors were collected and during the dynamic lifting tasks the whole body kinematics were collected. The whole body kinematics data were used in a dynamic biomechanical model to calculate the time-dependent moment about L5/S1 and the time-dependent lateral forces acting on the body segments. The results of the isometric weight-holding task show a significant (p < 0.05) effect of slant angle on the normalized integrated EMG values in both the left (increase by 26%) and right (increase by 70%) trunk extensors, indicating a significant increase in the protective co-contraction response. The results of the dynamic lifting tasks revealed a consistent reduction in the peak dynamic L5/S1 moment (decreased by 9%) and an increase in the instability producing lateral forces (increased by 111%) with increasing slant angle. These results provide quantitative insight into the response of the human lifter under these adverse lifting conditions.     

The impact of work configuration,target angle and hand force direction on upper extremity muscle activity during sub-maximal overhead work

Overhead work has established links to upper extremity discomfort and disorders. As many jobs incorporate working overhead, this study aimed to identify working conditions requiring relatively lower muscular shoulder load. Eleven upper extremity muscles were monitored with electromyography during laboratory simulations of overhead work tasks. Tasks were defined with three criteria: work configuration (fixed, stature-specific); target angle (?15°, 0°, 15°, 30° from vertical); direction of applied hand force (pulling backwards, pushing forwards, downwards, sideways, upwards). Normalised electromyographic activity was greater for fixed configurations, particularly when pulling in a backward direction (total activity = 108.3% maximum voluntary exertion (MVE)) compared to pushing down or forward (total activity ranging from 10.5 to 17.3%MVE). Further, pulling backwards at angles of –15° and 0° showed the highest muscular demand (p < 0.05). These results suggest that, if possible, positioning overhead work in front of the body with exertions directed forwards will result in the lowest upper extremity muscle demand.

Statement of Relevance: Overhead work pervades occupational settings and is associated with risk of upper extremity musculoskeletal disorders. The muscular intensity associated with performing overhead work was assessed in several combinations of work placement and hand force direction. These findings should have utility for designing overhead work tasks that reduce muscular exposure.     

Effects of negatively sloped keyboard wedges on risk factors for upper extremity work-related musculoskeletal disorders and user performance

Several changes to computer peripherals have been developed to reduce exposure to identified risk factors for musculoskeletal injury, notably in keyboard designs. Negative keyboard angles and their resulting effects on objective physiological measures, subjective measures and performance have been studied, although few angles have been investigated despite the benefits associated with their use. The objective of this study was to quantify the effects of negative keyboard angles on forearm muscle activity, wrist posture, key strike force, perceived discomfort and performance and to identify a negative keyboard angle or range of keyboard angles that minimizes exposure to risk factors for hand/wrist injuries. Ten experienced typists (four males and six females) participated in a laboratory study to compare keyboard angles ranging from 0 degrees to -30 degrees , at 10 degrees increments, and a keyboard with a 7 degrees slope, using a wedge designed for use with standard QWERTY keyboards. Repeatability of exposures was examined by requiring participants to complete two test sessions 1 week apart. Dependent variable data were collected during 10 min basic data entry tasks. Wrist posture data favoured negative keyboard angles of 0 degrees (horizontal) or greater, compared to a positive keyboard angle of 7 degrees , especially for the flexion/extension direction. In general, the percentage of wrist movements within a neutral zone and the percentages of wrist movements within +/-5 degrees and +/-10 degrees increased as keyboard angle became more negative. Electromyography results were mixed, with some variables supporting negative keyboard angles whilst other results favoured the standard keyboard configuration. Net typing speed supported the -10 degrees keyboard angle, whilst other negative typing angles were comparable, if not better than, with the standard keyboard. Therefore, angles ranging from 0 degrees to -30 degrees in general provide significant reductions in exposure to deviated wrist postures and muscle activity and comparable performance.     

Effects of low back disability status on lower back discomfort during sustained and cyclical trunk flexion

A laboratory study was conducted to determine the effects of back disability status on endurance time and perceived discomfort during trunk flexion. Eighty participants (40 with chronic or recurrent low back pain (CRLBP), 40 pain-free) were tested. The trunk was flexed to 15 degrees, 30 degrees, 45 degrees and 60 degrees under three conditions: 1) continuous static flexion; 2) cyclical flexion with 20% rest; and 3) cyclical flexion with 40% rest. Each condition was performed for up to 600 s or until the participant reached his/her pain tolerance limit. Dependent variables included time to distracting discomfort (TDD), total endurance time (TET) and perceived discomfort. For continuous exertions, CRLBP participants had lower TDD (p < 0.001), lower TET (p < 0.001) and greater discomfort (p < 0.001) compared to pain-free controls. In both groups, TDD and TET decreased and perceived discomfort increased as the flexion angle increased. For intermittent exertions, CRLBP participants reported greater discomfort than pain-free participants (p < 0.001). Increasing rest from 20 to 40% reduced discomfort in CRLBP participants, but produced no consistent benefit in pain-free participants. To accommodate persons with CRLBP, consideration should be given to reducing both the magnitude (angle) and duration of trunk flexion required by their jobs.     

Effects of negatively sloped keyboard wedges on risk factors for upper extremity work-related musculoskeletal disorders and user performance

Several changes to computer peripherals have been developed to reduce exposure to identified risk factors for musculoskeletal injury, notably in keyboard designs. Negative keyboard angles and their resulting effects on objective physiological measures, subjective measures and performance have been studied, although few angles have been investigated despite the benefits associated with their use. The objective of this study was to quantify the effects of negative keyboard angles on forearm muscle activity, wrist posture, key strike force, perceived discomfort and performance and to identify a negative keyboard angle or range of keyboard angles that minimizes exposure to risk factors for hand/wrist injuries. Ten experienced typists (four males and six females) participated in a laboratory study to compare keyboard angles ranging from 0° to ?30°, at 10° increments, and a keyboard with a 7° slope, using a wedge designed for use with standard QWERTY keyboards. Repeatability of exposures was examined by requiring participants to complete two test sessions 1 week apart. Dependent variable data were collected during 10 min basic data entry tasks. Wrist posture data favoured negative keyboard angles of 0° (horizontal) or greater, compared to a positive keyboard angle of 7°, especially for the flexion/extension direction. In general, the percentage of wrist movements within a neutral zone and the percentages of wrist movements within ±5° and ±10° increased as keyboard angle became more negative. Electromyography results were mixed, with some variables supporting negative keyboard angles whilst other results favoured the standard keyboard configuration. Net typing speed supported the ?10° keyboard angle, whilst other negative typing angles were comparable, if not better than, with the standard keyboard. Therefore, angles ranging from 0° to ?30° in general provide significant reductions in exposure to deviated wrist postures and muscle activity and comparable performance.     

Effects of forearm and palm supports on the upper extremity during computer mouse use

The use of forearm and palm supports has been associated with lower neck and shoulder muscle activity as well as reduced musculoskeletal discomfort during keyboard use, however, few studies have investigated their effect during computer mouse use. Eight men and eight women completed several computer mousing tasks in six arm support conditions: Forearm Support, Flat Palm Support, Raised Palm Support, Forearm + Flat Palm Support, Forearm + Raised Palm Support, and No Support. Concurrently, an infrared three-dimensional motion analysis system measured postures, six-degree-of-freedom force-torque sensors measured applied forces & torques, and surface electromyography measured muscle activity. The use of forearm support compared to the no support condition was significantly associated with less shoulder muscle activity & torque, and the raised palm support was associated with less wrist extension. Forearm supports reduced shoulder flexion torque by 90% compared to no support. The use of either support also resulted in lower applied forces to the mouse pad. Participants reported less musculoskeletal discomfort when using a support. These results provide recommendations for office workstation setup and inform ergonomists of effective ways to reduce musculoskeletal exposures.