市政公用行业管养分开的实践与思考

从2001年1月开始，在常熟市建设局领导下，常熟市市政设施管养行业实施了改革。改革的主要内容是实行管养分开，拨款改结算。市建设局授权市政公用处，代表政府行使市政设施管理职能，审批市政设施的占用、挖掘、并收取相应 牛用费和挖掘修复费，参与制定市政设施建、管、养的方针、政策、负     

浅议市政设施管修行业改革

市政设施管修行业的改革虽然取得了设施日新月异的进步和变化，但还存在一些不尽如人意之处，下一步改革之路怎么走，值得深思。在分析重庆市市设施管理现状问题的基础上，重点从坚持“以人为本”的价值取向出发，将关注民生作为改革落脚点，论述了统一思想，定位改革方向的重要性，进一步提出了转变方式、搞好市政设施管修的工作设想。     

欧美城市供水民营化及启示

随着中国市场经济体制改革的深入与完善,作为自然垄断行业的城市供水事业的改革已提上议程。自2002年以来,国家有关部委先后发布了《关于市政公用行业市场化进程的指导意见》、《市政公用事业特许经营管理办法》等文件,一些城市如北京、深圳等也出台了相应的地方规章,供水事业民营化的宏观政策环境与法律框架正逐步建立。作为市场经济高度发达的欧美国家,其城市供水事业改革的一些做法值得中国参考借鉴。本文从欧美国家供水事业民营化的基本情况人手,结合中国城市供水事业实际情况,对中国城市供水事业民营化提出了一些建议。     

用科学发展观引领改革促进单位又好又快发展

回顾总结了重庆市市政设施管理行业发展、改革的历程,重点突出以科学发展观为统领,积极稳妥地通过改革,建立有序、有利、有效的市政设施管理体制。多方位、多角度地分析了重庆市政设施管理状况,有针对性地提出了建设性意见。     

顽强拼搏铸辉煌 科学发展谱新篇——西安市市政设施管理局三十年发展纪实

2008年是我国改革开放30年。市政设施管理行业与其他行业一样,通过改革发生了巨大的变化。城市建设、城市管理旧貌换新颜。以西北地区特大城市西安的市政设施管理为例,突显出党的改革开放政策对市政设施管理行业的影响力。国家兴则行业兴,国家强则事业强。谨以本文纪念改革开放30年,欢呼改革开放30年。     

虱内外开发区市政设施建设投融资模式分析及启示

通过对国内外开发区市政设施建设投融资模式的比较分析，指出国内开发区在市政设施建设投融资体制上存在的不足，提出借鉴国外的成功经验，对完善我国开发区市政设施建设投融资体制有所帮助。     

以改革促发展 用创新提服务——合肥市市政设施分级管养体制改革纪实

2012年，合肥市按照改革必须向前推进，并且不但要改，还必须取得实实在在成效的要求，完成了市政设施的分级管养体制改革。通过对市区两级市政设施量、组织机构、管养职责、人财物的界定及调整与划拨，新的市政管养模式顺利过渡并开始有效运转。市区两级机构结合管养实际，以改革促发展，用创新提服务，通过强化监管与考核，提升管养为民、优质服务意识，力促管养水平提高和管养工作更好更快发展，为市政管养事业不断开创新局面而努力。     

安全生态理念下的市政给排水设施治理与对策分析

市政绐排水,是一项利民利国的市政工程,当前我国市政绐排水市政给排水的设施是否完善与市民的生活息息相关。当前,我国市政给排水设施在技术上以及生态理念上都还存在缺陷,市政工程在给排水设施建设的过程中,必须要进行技术的创新,遵循生态环保的建设理念。本文分析了我国当前市政给排水设施存在的问题,并重点提出了安全生态下的市政给排水设施建设的治理措施。     

开展城镇市政设施项目后评价势在必行

城镇市政设施作为城镇生存和发展的重要基础，在社会经济活动中起着十分重要的作用。随着我国城镇市政设施投资规模的扩大和城镇市政设施项目存在的问题的急需解决。迫切需要对已建成的城镇市政设施进行后评价。以便总结经验教训，提高未来项目投资、建设与运营管理的水平。     

上海市政设施管理事权下放后行业状况调研（上）

2008年是我国建设发展历程中的重要里程碑,改革开放30周年,盛世迎奥运,和谐遍神州。市政设施管理行业一直以来都是关系民生和经济发展的重要因素,1996年起,上海市市政设施管理体制改革启动。按照“两级政府、两级管理”的原则,开始“下权下放”、“管养分开”、“事企分开”三项行业内的重大改革,至今已有12年了。总结市政设施管理事权下放改革后的经验和不足,促进市政设施管理行业健康稳步发展。2008年1月起历时近3个月,调研小组采用调研提纲、问卷调查、个别访谈等形式对市政设施管理事权下放后,上海19个区县市政工程管理单位的行业状况进行了一次比较全面、深入的调研,形成本调查研究报告。对目前本市市政设施管理行业状况进行梳理总结,为继承成功经验,完善不足之处,形成更加优化,更有利于市政设施管理工作开展提出了相关意见和建议,期望调研能够更好地为继续解放思想、推动科学发展、促进社会和谐服务。     

Pittsburgh's translocal social movement: A case of the new public water

This paper contributes to the water privatization and governance literatures by examining the case of Pittsburgh where renewed efforts of water privatization have emerged after a failed private management arrangement between the local water authority and Veolia ended abruptly in 2015. We argue that, as the water authority aims to rebuild trust in the community, resident mobilization has played a key role in hindering further privatizing arrangements and has exerted influence in defining what constitutes the “new public” water in Pittsburgh, by advocating for increased transparency and accountability in governance, infrastructure improvements and protections for low-income residents.     

A comparison of tenurial change and privatization in two Garden City communities: Sunnyside Gardens,New York City and Garbatella,Rome

The paper problematizes public housing privatization. It compares the trajectory of tenure change in two garden communities – Garbatella, Rome and Sunnyside Gardens, New York City – which privileged public and private ownership, respectively. The cases are currently dealing with tenure change. Sunnyside experienced the enclosure of gardens and citizens’ attempt to reclaim what was held in common in order to bring back the communal spaces. Garbatella is a place where growth over time of rights, powers, immunities, and privileges is manifested in long-lasting processes of appropriation of public housing goods. Despite their different stories, Sunnyside helps to problematize the process of public housing privatization in Garbatella which is further complicated by tenure complexity, State-induced rent gap and institutional displacement. The analysis of tenure change, done by using the ‘incidents of ownership’ notion developed by Marcuse, contributes to the understanding of what public housing privatization means in social and spatial terms. Housing privatization leads to an erosion of the in-between space where individual and collective aspiration meet as a precondition for the reproduction of what is held in common: spatial goods such as open spaces and housing – a fundamental aspect of our citizenship.     

天津市公共基础设施社会效益评价与提升研究

针对天津市2004~2013年公共基础设施系统,建立公共基础设施社会效益评价体系,并采用主成分法分析其社会效益,明确天津市基础设施社会效益的提升路径,进而从加大公共基础设施投入力度、加强公共基础设施运营与管理、优化公共基础设施投资结构角度提出提升对策。     

Open questions for public water management: Discussions from Uruguay's restatization process

In Uruguay, potable water services—privatized during the neoliberal period—were set to return to the public sphere in the mid-2000s. This was a promising scenario as it entailed a wide scope for development. However, over a decade after this process was set in motion, the results are discouraging. The new problems in public water management have to do with outsourcing key areas and covert privatization processes. Furthermore, rate reforms transferred the problems created in natural water basins to mass users, which implies a form of water privatization as the entire society subsidizes the environmental costs of pollution (Ribeiro, 2006).There is a wide variety of gray areas between the public management model, where service provision is a common good and a state responsibility, and the private management model, where the service becomes a commodity.This paper analyzes the restatization and public management of drinking water services in Uruguay according to a state logic and its inertias in the transition from neoliberal to progressive administrations. Institutional inertia is critical in these experiences because it renders services the joint and complex result of combining a state logic and a privatization logic, where public oversight and community participation are mentioned by some government authorities but excluded in practice. This is what Gautreau and Perrier have called neoliberal resilience (2019). These logics intertwine perversely in key management areas, such as rate structures.     

Privatization: Infrastructure on the Urban Edge

ABSTRACT: In 1989 two public-private coalitions were formed to help plan and develop physical and social infrastructure in Rouse Hill, a minicity of a quarter of a million people for the northwest fringe of Sydney, Australia. Brought together at the instigation of state government bureaucrats, the coalitions were lobby groups and alternative providers of services. The groups drew on unequal resources and had different impacts on the development. Although subject to an increasingly expensive set of environmental requirements, the physical infrastructure providers seized the initiative in privatizing, gaining a large amount of control over the form and timing of development. In contrast, the social service coalition was a reluctant heir of privatization.     

Capture and corruption in public utilities: The cases of water and electricity in Sub-Saharan Africa

The paper focuses on public utilities services located in poor countries with a special attention to capture and corruption issues. It confronts the optimal policy of Auriol and Picard [Privatization in Developing Countries and the Government Budget Constraint, Nota di Lavoro 75.2002. Fondazione Eni Enrico Mattei, Milan, Italy] regarding private sector involvement in public utilities with empirical evidence on water and electricity in Sub-Saharan Africa (SSA). As predicted by the theory, the participation of private unregulated firms in the supply of services for the middle class and poor people is fairly common in SSA. By contrast, services for rich people are provided by public utilities. Theory suggests that their prices should be high so that the public firms make a profit. Yet piped water and electricity are subsidized. This suggests that there is a problem of capture by the ruling elite. Since ruling elites design privatization programs, there is concern about their optimality. The paper shows that the social cost of corrupted privatization is non-monotone in the opportunity cost of public funds. Because of the fiscal loss it represents, privatizing profit centers of public firms entails huge social costs in very poor countries.     

关于后世博时期上海公交基础设施运营管理模式的探讨

本文简述了城市公交基础设施的范围和特点,上海城市公交基础设施的管理体制机制、资产现状,详细分析了上海公交基础设施现行的两种管理模式、各自特点及存在的问题,并对后世博时期公交基础设施管理模式创新-＂站运分离＂前提下的专业化管理模式进行了探讨。     

美国城市公共空间的发展历史

美国城市公共空间的发展历史主要包括市民空间阶段,广场的衰落,游憩墓地阶段,公园运动,社区和邻里公园阶段,公共领域的衰落及公共空间的私有化等重要阶段和事件。     

PRIVATIZATION AND HOUSING UNDER THATCHER

ABSTRACT: This paper explores and analyzes the privatization of the public housing sector in the United Kingdom. In doing so, it argues that the sale of state-owned dwellings has been one of the most significant achievements of the Thatcher administrations. While share issues in state enterprises, such as British Telecom or British Gas, have attracted widespread academic attention, it is the reshaping of the housing sector which has had major social, spatial, and fiscal impacts. Within the welfare state, public housing has, so far, borne the brunt of privatization.     

Allocation mechanisms in public provision of transport and communication infrastructure

This study explores the allocation mechanisms in the public provision of interregional transport and communication infrastructure in Sweden. The logistics of the flow of infrastructure investments from the government budget is examined. The purpose is to consider how the demand for infrastructure investment is estimated by public agencies, how judgments are made on governmental expenditure policy, and what determines the spatial distribution of infrastructure investment. The analysis is carried out along four main lines; demand for infrastructure services, political intentions and goals, the modal composition of investments for transport and communication, and the spatial distribution of infrastructure. The discussion considers functional, spatial, and temporal consistency aspects in the public provision of infrastructure.