Properties of acrylonitrile–butadiene–styrene/polycarbonate blends with styrene–butadiene–styrene block copolymer

The importance of alloys and blends has increased gradually in the polymer industry so that the plastics industry has moved toward complex systems. The main reasons for making polymer blends are the strengthening and the economic aspects of the resultant product. In this study, I attempted to improve compatibility in a polymer blend composed of two normally incompatible constituents, namely, acrylonitrile–butadiene–styrene (ABS) and polycarbonate (PC), through the addition of a compatibilizer. The compatibilizing agent, styrene–butadiene–styrene block copolymer (SBS), was added to the polymer blend in ratios of 1, 5, and 10% with a twin‐screw extruder. The morphology and the compatibility of the mixtures were examined by scanning electron microscopy and differential scanning calorimetry. Further, all three blends of ABS/PC/SBS were subjected to examination to obtain their yield and tensile strengths, elasticity modulus, percentage elongation, Izod impact strength, hardness, heat deflection temperature, Vicat softening point, and melt flow index. © 2004 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 93: 2521–2527, 2004     

Acrylonitrile–butadiene–styrene toughened nylon 6: The influences of compatibilizer on morphology and impact properties

Polymer alloys have been used as an alternative to obtain polymeric materials with unique physical properties. Generally, the polymer mixture is incompatible, which makes it necessary to use a compatibilizer to improve the interfacial adhesion. Nylon 6 (PA6) is an attractive polymer to use in engineering applications, but it has processing instability and relatively low notched impact strength. In this study, the acrylonitrile–butadiene–styrene (ABS) triblock copolymer was used as an impact modifier for PA6. Poly(methyl methacrylate‐co‐maleic anyhydride) (MMA‐MA) and poly(methyl methacrylate‐co‐glycidyl methacrylate) (MMA‐GMA) were used as compatibilizers for this blend. The morphology and impact strength of the blends were evaluated as a function of blend composition and the presence of compatibilizers. The blends compatibilized with maleated copolymer exhibited an impact strength up to 800 J/m and a morphology with ABS domains more efi8ciently dispersed. Moderate amounts of MA functionality in the compatibilizer (～5%) and small amounts of compatibilizer in the blend (～5%) appear sufficient to improve the impact properties and ABS dispersion. © 2002 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 87: 842–847, 2003     

Mechanical,thermal, and microstructural properties of polypropylene/polyamide‐6/styrene‐ethylene‐butadiene‐styrene polymer alloys

Interfacial agents as compatibilizers have recently been introduced into polymer blends to improve the microstructure and mechanical properties of thermoplastics. In this way, it is possible to prepare a mixture of polymeric materials that can have superior mechanical properties over a wide temperature range. In this study, an incompatible blend of polypropylene (PP) and polyamide‐6 (PA₆) were made compatible by the addition of 10% styrene–ethylene–butadiene–styrene copolymer (SEBS). The mixing operation was conducted by using a twin‐screw extruder. The morphology and the compatibility of the mixtures were examined by SEM and DSC techniques. Furthermore, the elastic modulus, tensile and yield strengths, percentage elongation, hardness, melt flow index, Izod impact resistance, heat deflection temperature (HDT), and Vicat softening point values of polymer alloys of various ratios were determined. It was found that the addition of SEBS to the structures decreased the tensile strength, yield strength, elastic modulus, and hardness, whereas it increased the Izod impact strength and percentage elongation values. © 2003 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 89: 3485–3491, 2003     

Compatibilization of styrene–butadiene–styrene block copolymer in polypropylene/polystyrene blends by analysis of phase morphology

Effect of compatibilization of styrene–butadiene–styrene (SBS) block copolymer in polypropylene/polystyrene (PP/PS) blends was studied by means of small angle X‐ray scattering (SAXS) and scanning electron microscope (SEM). According to SAXS, a certain amount of SBS was located at the interface in all the analyzed samples, forming the relatively thicker interface layer penetrating into homopolymers, and the thickness of the interface layer was quantified in terms of Porod light scattering theory. The incorporation of SBS into PP/PS blends resulted in a decrease in domain size following an emulsification curve as well as an uniform size distribution, and consequently, a fine dispersion of PP domains in the PS matrix. This effect was more pronounced when the concentration of SBS was higher. A critical concentration of SBS of 15% above which the interface layer approaches to saturation and domain size attains a steady‐state was observed. Further, the morphology fluctuation of unetched fracture surface of umcompatibilized and compatibilized blends was analyzed using an integral constant Q based on Debye‐Bueche light scattering theories. Variation of Q as a function of the concentration of SBS showed that, due to the penetrating interface layer, adhesion between phases was improved, making it possible for applied stress to transfer between phases and leading to more uniform stress distribution when blends were broken; accordingly, a more complicated morphology fluctuation of fracture surface appeared. © 2006 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 103:365–370, 2007     

Effect of compatibilizer in acrylonitrile‐butadiene‐styrene toughened nylon 6 blends: Ductile–brittle transition temperature

The ductile–brittle transition temperatures were determined for compatibilized nylon 6/acrylonitrile‐butadiene‐styrene (PA6/ABS) copolymer blends. The compatibilizers used for those blends were methyl methacrylate‐co‐maleic anhydride (MMA‐MAH) and MMA‐co‐glycidyl methacrylate (MMA‐GMA). The ductile–brittle transition temperatures were found to be lower for blends compatibilized through maleate modified acrylic polymers. At room temperature, the PA6/ABS binary blend was essentially brittle whereas the ternary blends with MMA‐MAH compatibilizer were supertough and showed a ductile–brittle transition temperature at ?10°C. The blends compatibilized with maleated copolymer exhibited impact strengths of up to 800 J/m. However, the blends compatibilized with MMA‐GMA showed poor toughness at room temperature and failed in a brittle manner at subambient temperatures. © 2003 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 90: 2643–2647, 2003     

Compatibilization efficiency of styrene–butadiene triblock copolymers in polystyrene–polypropylene blends with varying compositions

The compatibilization efficiency of two styrene‐butadiene‐styrene triblock copolymers with short (SB1) and long (SB2) styrene blocks was studied in polystyrene (PS)–polypropylene (PP) blends of composition 20, 50, and 80 wt % PS. The supramolecular structure of the blends was determined by small‐angle X‐ray scattering, and the morphology was studied with transmission electron microscopy and scanning electron microscopy. Structural changes in both the uncompatibilized and compatibilized blends were correlated with the values of tensile impact strength of these blends. Even though the compatibilization mechanisms were different in blends with SB1 and SB2, the addition of the block copolymers to the PS–PP 4/1 and PS–PP 1/4 blends led to similar structures and improved the mechanical properties in the same way. These block copolymers had a very slight effect on the impact strength in PS–PP 1/1 blends, exhibiting a nearly cocontinuous phase morphology. The strong migration of SB2 copolymers to the interface and of SB1 copolymers away from the interface were detected during the annealing of compatibilized PS–PP 4/1 blends. © 2004 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 92: 2431–2441, 2004     

Amphiphilic styrene–butadiene–styrene triblock copolymer grafted with polyoxyethylene

A styrene–butadiene–styrene triblock copolymer (SBS) was grafted with polyoxyethylene via a ring‐opening reaction of an epoxidized styrene–butadiene– styrene triblock copolymer (ESBS) with monocarboxylic‐group‐terminated methoxypoly(ethylene glycol) (CMPEG). The latter was prepared through the esterification of methoxypoly(ethylene glycol) with maleic anhydride. The optimum conditions for the preparation of the graft copolymer were studied. The graft copolymer was characterized with Fourier transform infrared spectrophotometry. Its water absorbency, oil absorbency, emulsifying property, phase‐transfer catalysis property in the Williamson solid–liquid reaction, and use as a compatibilizer in the blending of SBS with oil‐resistant chlorohydrin rubber (CHR) were also studied. The optimum conditions were a CMPEG/epoxy group molar ratio of 1.5, an N,N‐dimethyl aniline/ESBS concentration of 5 wt %, and an ESBS concentration of 12–14 g/100 mL at 75–80°C for 10 h. The polyoxyethylene content could reach 0.27 mmol/g. The graft copolymer absorbed a certain amount of water, fairly resisted kerosene, and possessed good emulsifying and phase‐transfer catalysis properties, both of which were enhanced with increasing polyoxyethylene graft content. The graft copolymer could be used as a compatibilizer for a blend of SBS and CHR. A 3 wt % concentration of the graft copolymer based on a 50/50 blend could increase both the tensile strength and ultimate elongation of the blend about 1.7 times. The blend behaved like an oil‐resistant thermoplastic elastomer. Scanning electron microscopy demonstrated the improved compatibility of the two components by the graft copolymer. © 2007 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci, 2008     

Compatibilization of polyethylene terephthalate/polypropylene blends with styrene–ethylene/butylene–styrene (SEBS) block copolymers

Blends of polyethylene terephthalate (PET) and polypropylene (PP) at compositions 20/80 and 80/20 were modified with three different styrene–ethylene/butyl–ene-styrene (SEBS) triblock copolymers with the aim of improving the compatibility and in particular the toughness of the blends. The compatibilizers involved an unfunctionalized SEBS and two functionalized grades containing either maleic anhydride (SEBS-g-MAH) or glycidyl methacrylate (SEBS-g-GMA) grafted to the midblock. The effects of the compatibilizers were evaluated by studies on morphology and mechanical, thermal and rheological properties of the blends. The additon of 5 wt % of a SEBS copolymer was found to stabilize the blend morphology and to improve the impact strength. The effect was, however, far more pronounced with the functionalized copolymers. Particularly high toughness combined with rather high stiffness was achieved with SEBS-g-GMA for the PET-rich composition. Addition of the functionalized SEBS copolymers resulted in a finer dispersion of the minor phase and clearly improved interfacial adhesion. Shifts in the glass transition temperature of the PET phase and increase in the melt viscosity of the compatibilized blends indicated enhanced interactions between the discrete PET and PP phases induced by the functionalized compatibilizer, in particular SEBS-g-GMA. © 1997 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 65:241–249, 1997     

Effect of styrene‐butadiene triblock copolymer structure on its compatibilization efficiency in PS/PB and PS/PP blends

Two styrene‐butadiene triblock copolymers differing in the length of their styrene blocks (40S‐60B‐40S and 10S‐60B‐10S) were used as compatibilizers for PS/PB (4/1) and PS/PP (4/1) blends. The supramolecular structure of the copolymers determined by small‐angle X‐ray scattering (SAXS), morphology of the blends using transmission electron microscopy (TEM), and their tensile impact strength were chosen as criteria of the compatibilization efficiency of the copolymers used. Different mechanisms of compatibilization for “symmetrical” system (PS/PB/SBS) and “asymmetrical” system (PS/PP/SBS) were proved. While for the PS/PB blend, the 40S‐60B‐40S copolymer proved to be a good compatibilizer, for the PS/PP blend, surprisingly, the 10S‐60B‐10S copolymer is more efficient.     

Compatibility effect of radiation‐grafting‐functionalized styrene–butadiene–styrene on polyamide 6/styrene–butadiene–styrene blends

Styrene–butadiene–styrene (SBS) was grafted with dibutyl maleate (DBM), methacrylic acid (MAA), or maleic anhydride (MAH) by ⁶⁰Co γ‐rays. The grafted SBS was blended with polyamide 6 (PA6). The compatibility of the PA6/SBS blends was studied with scanning electron microscopy and rheological measurements. The results showed significant improvement in the compatibility of PA6 blended with MAH‐ or MAA‐grafted SBS, with the former being more effective, whereas grafting DBM was ineffective in this respect. Mechanisms of the compatibility enhancement and ineffectiveness are discussed. © 2008 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci, 2008     

Preparation and properties of styrene–ethylene–butylene–styrene block copolymer/clay nanocomposites: I. Effect of clay content and compatibilizer types

BACKGROUND: Polymer/clay (silicate) systems exhibit great promise for industrial applications due to their ability to display synergistically advanced properties with relatively small amounts of clay loads. The effects of various compatibilizers on styrene–ethylene–butylene–styrene block copolymer (SEBS)/clay nanocomposites with various amounts of clay using a melt mixing process are investigated. RESULTS: SEBS/clay nanocomposites were prepared via melt mixing. Two types of maleated compatibilizers, styrene–ethylene–butylene–styrene block copolymer grafted maleic anhydride (SEBS‐g‐MA) and polypropylene grafted maleic anhydride (PP‐g‐MA), were incorporated to improve the dispersion of various amounts of commercial organoclay (denoted as 20A). Experimental samples were analyzed using X‐ray diffraction and transmission electron microscopy. Thermal stability was enhanced through the addition of clay with or without compatibilizers. The dynamic mechanical properties and rheological properties indicated enhanced interaction for the compatibilized nanocomposites. In particular, the PP‐g‐MA compatibilized system conferred higher tensile strength or Young's modulus than the SEBS‐g‐MA compatibilized system, although SEBS‐g‐MA seemed to further expand the interlayer spacing of the clay compared with PP‐g‐MA. CONCLUSION: These unusual results suggest that the matrix properties and compatibilizer types are crucial factors in attaining the best mechanical property performance at a specific clay content. Copyright © 2007 Society of Chemical Industry     

The effect of interfacial adhesion on the impact strength of immiscible PP/PETG blends compatibilized with triblock copolymers

In this work, recycled Poly(ethylene glycol-co-cyclohexane-1,4-dimethanol terephthalate) plastic (PETG) was used to enhance the properties and lower the cost of polypropylene(PP). In order to adjust the interfacial adhesion, three triblock copolymers having the same styrene block at two ends but different block in the middle, were used a the compatibilizers, namely, styrene–ethylene/butylene–styrene (SEBS), styrene–butadiene–styrene (SBS), styrene–isoprene–styrene (SIS). The ratio of PP to PETG was fixed at 70/30 and the relationship between interfacial adhesion and mechanical properties was investigated. The addition of SIS caused a considerable increase in Izod impact toughness, but only slightly improved toughness was observed for blends compatibilized with SEBS. The effect of SBS on improving the impact toughness lied in between that of SIS and SEBS. SEM micrographs showed that PETG forms a fibrillar-like structure for all the uncompatibilized and compatibilized blends, and the blends compatibilized with SBS have smallest domain size, the blends compatibilized with SEBS have largest domain size, while the ones compatibilized with SIS show a moderate domain size. Results from melt rheometry and SEM observation together with work of interfacial adhesion, indicated a strongest interfacial adhesion in blends compatibilized with SBS, poorest in blends compatibilized with SEBS, and moderate in blends compatibilized with SIS. It is very interesting to found that the much improved impact strength was not observed in the blends with the strongest interfacial adhesion but achieved in the blend with moderate interfacial adhesion. Investigation on the impact fractured surface revealed an easier debonding of fibril from matrix and consequently drawn out of matrix in blends compatibilized by SIS with moderate interfacial adhesion, which was considered as the main reason for the much improved impact toughness in this system.     

Novel method for preparation of quaternary ammonium ionomer from epoxidized styrene–butadiene–styrene triblock copolymer and its use as compatibilizer for blending of styrene–butadiene–styrene and chlorosulfonated polyethylene

A novel method for the preparation of a quaternary ammonium ionomer of styrene–butadiene–styrene triblock copolymer (SBS) was developed by a ring‐opening reaction of epoxidized SBS with triethylamine hydrochloride in the presence of a phase transfer catalyst. The optimum conditions were studied. The ionomer was characterized by quantitative analysis, IR spectroscopy, and ¹H‐NMR spectroscopy. Its water absorbency, oil absorbency, dilute solution viscosity, and use as a compatibilizer for the blending of SBS and chlorosulfonated polyethylene (CSPE) were investigated. The results showed that, under optimum conditions, the epoxy groups can be completely converted to the quaternary ammonium groups. The IR spectrum did not exhibit the absorption peak for quaternary ammonium groups, whereas the ¹H‐NMR spectrum and titration method demonstrated it. With increasing ionic group content, the water absorbency of the ionomer increased whereas its oil absorbency decreased. These indicated the amphiphilic character of the SBS ionomer. The dilute solution viscosity of the ionomer in toluene/methanol (9/1) solvent increased with increasing quaternary ammonium group content. The ionomer was used as a compatibilizer for the blends of SBS and CSPE. The addition of a small amount of the ionomer to the blend enhanced the mechanical properties of the blends: 2 wt % ionomer based on the blend increased the tensile strength and ultimate elongation of the blend nearly 2 times. The blends of equal parts SBS and CSPE behaved as oil‐resistant thermoplastic elastomers. © 2005 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 99: 1975–1980, 2006     

Blends of styrene–butadiene–styrene triblock copolymer and isotactic polypropylene: morphology and thermomechanical properties

A set of blends of styrene–butadiene–styrene triblock copolymer (SBS) and isotactic polypropylene (i‐PP) in a composition range 0–100 % polypropylene by weight was prepared in a twin screw extruder. The morphology of the blends has been studied by transmission electron microscopy. The blends present phase separation. Dynamic mechanical measurements show an improvement of the mechanical properties of SBS when i‐PP is the dispersed phase. This reinforcing effect can be observed even at high temperatures when i‐PP is in the rubbery state. The mechanical properties of the blends have been interpreted using Takayanagi's block model. The melting and crystallization behaviour of the i‐PP in the blends has been studied by differential scanning calorimetry. The fractionated crystallization phenomenon has been observed in the blends where i‐PP forms the dispersed phase. The results are consistent with the morphology shown by the blends, in particular, with its phase inversion, which occurs at a composition near to 50% i‐PP. © 2000 Society of Chemical Industry     

Influences of dicumyl peroxide on morphology and mechanical properties of polypropylene/poly(styrene‐b‐butadiene‐b‐styrene) blends via vane‐extruder

Polypropylene (PP) and poly(styrene‐b‐butadiene‐b‐styrene) block copolymer (SBS) were melt‐blended in the presence of initiator system. Dicumyl peroxide (DCP)/Triallyl isocyanurate (TAIC) via self‐deigned VE, aiming at in situ reactive compatibilization of toughed PP/SBS blend. The reactivity, morphology and mechanical properties of PP/SBS/DCP/TAIC blends were studied. Online torque detection was conducted to monitor changes in viscosities of reactive compatibilized blends, which could give proof of the interfacial grafted reaction induced by DCP/TAIC system. The effect of reactive compatibilization on the dispersed particles sizes and interfacial adhesion was studied by scanning electron microscopy. Analysis on mechanical performance revealed the impact strength improved after treated by initiator system, moreover, the impact‐fractured surface observation showed, the failure mode changed from debonding mechanism of neat 50PP/50SBS blend to plastic deformation mechanism of blend containing 3.0 phr initiator system. With improved interfacial adhesion, compatibilized blends not only were toughened but also exhibited enhanced tensile strength and thermal stability. Dynamic mechanical analysis showed a reduction of between PP phase and the PB segments in SBS phase, indicating reactive compatibilization of the blend was achieved. In the final part, a brief discussion was given about the dominant effects from chain scission of PP matrix to intergrafting reactions of PP and SBS, under different content of DCP/TAIC initiator system. © 2014 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2015 , 132, 41543.     

The effect of compatibilizers and organically modified nanoclay on the morphology and performance properties of poly(acrylonitrile–butadiene–styrene)/polypropylene blends

In this study, poly(acrylonitrile–butadiene–styrene)/polypropylene (ABS/PP) blends with various compositions were prepared by melt intercalation in a twin‐screw extruder. Modifications of the above blends were performed by using organically modified montmorillonite (OMMT, Cloisite 30B) reinforcement as well as two types of compatibilizers, namely polypropylene grafted with maleic anhydride (PP‐g‐MAH) and ABS grafted with maleic anhydride (ABS‐g‐MAH). Increasing the PP content in ABS matrix seems to increase the melt flow and thermal stability of their blends, whereas a deterioration of the tensile properties was recorded. On the other hand, the addition of ABS to PP promotes the formation of the β‐crystalline phase, which became maximum at 30 wt% ABS concentration, and increases the crystallization temperature (T_c) of PP. A tendency for increase of T_c was also recorded by incorporation of the above compatibilizers, whereas the glass transition temperature (T_g) of PP and SAN phase in ABS was reduced. Regarding the Young's modulus, the greatest improvement was observed in pure ABS/PP blends containing organically modified nanoclay. However, in reinforced pure PP, the use of compatibilizers is recommended in order to improve the elastic modulus. The addition of OMMT to noncompatibilized and compatibilized ABS/PP blends significantly improves their storage modulus. POLYM. ENG. SCI., 56:458–468, 2016. © 2016 Society of Plastics Engineers     

Effect of styrene–isopren–styrene addition on the recycled polycarbonate/acrylonitrile–butadiene–styrene polymer blends

Interfacial agents as compatibilizers have recently been introduced into polymer blends to improve microstructure and mechanical properties of thermoplastics. In this way, it is possible to prepare a mixture of polymeric materials that can have superior mechanical properties over a wide temperature range. In this study, an incompatible blend of Polycarbonate (PC) and Acrylonitrile Butadiene Styrene (ABS) Copolymer were made compatible by addition of 5, 10, and 20% Styrene–Isopren–Styrene Copolymer (SIS). The mixing operation was conducted using a twin‐screw extruder. The morphology and the compatibility of the mixtures were examined by SEM and DSC techniques. Furthermore, the elastic modulus, tensile and yield strengths, percentage elongation, hardness, melt flow index, Izod impact resistance, heat deflection temperature (HDT), Vicat softening point values of polymer alloys of various ratios were determined. It was found that addition of SIS to the structures decreased the tensile strength, yield strength, elastic modulus, and hardness, whereas it increased Izod impact strength and percentage elongation values. © 2006 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 101: 559–566, 2006     

Synthesis of a maleic anhydride grafted polypropylene–butadiene copolymer and its application in polypropylene/styrene–butadiene–styrene triblock copolymer/organophilic montmorillonite composites as a compatibilizer

A maleic anhydride grafted propylene–butadiene copolymer (MPPB) was prepared. Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy and ¹H‐NMR results indicate that the maleic anhydride molecules reacted with the double bond in the butadiene unit of the propylene–butadiene copolymer (PPB), and the grafting percentage increased with the butadiene content in the initial copolymer. The gel permeation chromatography results show that the introduction of butadiene in the copolymer prevented the degradation of PPB. The MPPB was applied in polypropylene (PP)/styrene‐butadiene‐styrene triblock copolymer (SBS)/organophilic montmorillonite (OMMT) composites as a compatibilizer. In the presence of 10‐phr MPPB, the impact strength of the composite was improved by about 20%. X‐ray diffraction patterns indicated the formation of the β‐phase crystallization of PP in the presence of MPPB, and a significant decrease in the spherulite size was observed. Transmission electron microscopy (TEM) images showed that the OMMT was better dispersed in the matrix upon the inclusion of MPPB. A better distribution of the rubber phase and a rugged fracture surface were observed in the scanning electron microscopy images as the MPPB proportion was increased. © 2009 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci, 2009     

Positron annihilation lifetime spectroscopy for miscibility investigations of styrene–butadiene–styrene copolymer/polystyrene blends

The free volume parameters of styrene–butadiene–styrene copolymer/polystyrene (SBS/PS) blends were investigated with positron annihilation lifetime spectroscopy (PALS) in this study. The behaviors of free volume distribution, average free volume, and relative fractional free volume revealed the difference of interfacial miscibility. Based on different models, inter‐chain interaction parameter β, geometric factor γ, and hydrodynamic interaction parameter α obtained from free volume data were employed to further determine the effect of molecular architecture and styrene content on the miscibility. The results suggest the better miscibility in star‐shaped SBS/PS blends than that of corresponding linear SBS/PS systems, even than that of systems containing more styrene unit. In addition, differential scanning calorimetry, dynamic mechanical analysis, and scanning electron microscopy, which are sensitive to heterogeneities in larger domain size, give different results of miscibility from free volume data. It should be attributed the difference of characterization scale. The mechanical property corroborates the results of miscibility. POLYM. ENG. SCI., 54:785–793, 2014. © 2013 Society of Plastics Engineers     

Toughening of polypropylene with styrene/ethylene‐butylene/styrene triblock copolymer: Effects of reactive and nonreactive compatibilization

The effects of the compatibilization on the toughening of polypropylene (PP) by melt blending with styrene/ethylene‐butylene/styrene triblock copolymer (SEBS) in a twin‐screw extruder were investigated. The compatibilizers used were an SEBS functionalized with maleic anhydride, a PP functionalized with acrylic acid, and a bifunctional compound, p‐phenylenediamine (PPD). The effects of the compatibilization were evaluated through the mechanical properties and by the determination of the phase morphology of the blends by scanning electron microscopy. Reactive compatibilized blends show up to a 30‐fold increase in impact strength compared to neat PP, which was likely to have been due to the reaction of the bifunctional compound (PPD) with the acid acrylic and maleic anhydride groups, which rendered both morphological and mechanical stability to these blends. The addition of the PPD to the blends significantly changed their phase morphologies, leading to larger dispersed particles' average diameters, probably due to the morphological stabilization at the initial processing steps during extrusion, with the occurrence of the chemical reactions. © 2003 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 88: 1081–1094, 2003