Differential effects of forward or simultaneous conditioned stimulus-unconditioned stimulus intervals on the defensive behavior system of the Norway rat (Rattus norvegicus).

To test several predictions derived from a behavior-systems approach, the authors assessed Pavlovian fear conditioning in rats after 30 trials of forward, simultaneous, or unpaired training. Direct evidence of conditioned fear was collected through observation of flight and freezing reactions during presentations of the conditioned stimulus (CS) alone. The authors also tested the CS's potential to reinforce an instrumental escape response in an escape-from-fear paradigm. On the one hand, rats that received forward training showed conditioned freezing, but no conditioned flight was observed. On the other hand, rats that received simultaneous training showed conditioned flight, but no conditioned freezing was observed. Rats that received either forward or simultaneous pairings showed instrumental learning of the escape-from-fear response. Implications for several theories of Pavlovian conditioning are discussed. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2010 APA, all rights reserved)     

Induction of receptive field plasticity in the auditory cortex of the guinea pig during instrumental avoidance conditioning.

Classical tone conditioning shifts frequency tuning in the auditory cortex to favor processing of the conditioned stimulus (CS) frequency versus other frequencies. This receptive field (RF) plasticity is associative, highly specific, rapidly acquired, and indefinitely retained—all important characteristics of memory. The investigators determined whether RF plasticity also develops during instrumental learning. RFs were obtained before and up to 24 hr after 1 session of successful 1-tone avoidance conditioning in guinea pigs. Long-term RF plasticity developed in all subjects (N?=?6). Two-tone discrimination training also produced RF plasticity, like classical conditioning. Because avoidance responses prevent full elicitation of fear by the CS, long-term RF plasticity does not require the continual evocation of fear, suggesting that neural substrates of fear expression are not essential to RF plasticity. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2010 APA, all rights reserved)     

Inhibition by diazepam of the effect of additional training and of extinction on the retention of shuttle avoidance behavior in rats.

Rats were submitted to a training and a test session in a shuttle avoidance task. In some groups, a second training session was interpolated 2 or 24 hr after the first session. In others, a session of extinction was interpolated 2 or 24 hr after the training session. When the interpolated task was 2 hr after training, training-test interval was 24 hr. When the interpolated task was 24 hr after training, training-test interval was 48 hr. The additional training enhanced, and the extinction depressed, retention test performance. Diazepam, given 30 min prior to the first (or only) training session enhanced the performance of avoidance responses in that session but inhibited it in the subsequent retention test. Diazepam given 90 min after training had no effect on retention. Diazepam given 30 min prior to either the additional training session or the extinction session did not affect performance in that session but canceled their effects on retention test performance. The effects are related to the previously described prevention by diazepam of interfering effects on memory. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2010 APA, all rights reserved)     

An associative process maintains reflex facilitation of the unconditioned nictitating membrane response during the early stages of training.

The presentation of a neutral or conditioned stimulus (CS) at an appropriate interval prior to the presentation of a corneal airpuff or a paraorbital shock (unconditioned stimulus, US) can facilitate the amplitude of the unconditioned nictitating membrane (NM) response in rabbits. In two experiments, it was demonstrated that an associative process mediates the maintenance of that facilitation during repeated CS–US pairings. Although CS-alone presentations produced a substantial decrease in the amount of reflex facilitation in animals not pretrained with the CS, pretraining that consisted of paired CS–US presentations prevented that decrease when CS-alone presentations were subsequently given. Conditioned facilitation of the unconditioned response occurred very rapidly (within 5–22 trials in these experiments) and long before the appearance of overt conditioned responses to the CS. In addition, it was demonstrated that conditioned facilitation can be relatively specific to the tonal frequency of the CS. These results indicate the first sign of conditioning of the NM response is exhibited in the amplitude of the unconditioned response. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2010 APA, all rights reserved)     

Effects of muscimol applied to the basolateral amygdala on acquisition and expression of contextual fear conditioning in rats

The amygdala is known to be important for normal aversive Pavlovian learning in the rat. The relative contribution of the amygdala to the learning vs. performance of conditional fear with the GABAa agonist muscimol was assessed. Rats were prepared with cannulas aimed at the basolateral amygdala and trained in a contextual fear conditioning paradigm in which each subject received a series of footshocks in a distinctive observation chamber. Conditional responses evoked after exposure to the observation chamber were assessed 24 hr later. Rats that were pretreated with muscimol before performance showed a significantly attenuated fear response, and injections made before acquisition resulted in a much smaller decrement in conditional fear measured 24 hr after training. These results indicate that acquisition-related processes that may be occurring within the amygdala are more difficult to disrupt than those associated with performance.     

Anterograde amnesia for Pavlovian fear conditioning and the role of one trial overshadowing: Effects of preconditioning exposures to morphine in rat.

Four experiments studied anterograde deficits in Pavlovian fear conditioning following prolonged exposure to the μ-opioid receptor agonist morphine. Injections of morphine produced temporally graded anterograde amnesia characterized by deficits in contextual and conditioned-stimulus (CS) conditioning 1 or 7 days and selective impairment in CS conditioning 21 days after last injection. This anterograde deficit in conditioning did not recover across a retention interval, was absent when rats were tested immediately after conditioning, and required the presence of an auditory CS. These results suggest that anterograde deficits in Pavlovian fear conditioning emerged from differences in susceptibility to 1-trial overshadowing of context by CS. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2010 APA, all rights reserved)     

N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor antagonist MK-801 impairs learning but not memory fixation or expression of classical fear conditioning in goldfish (Carassius auratus).

Examined in 5 experiments the amnestic effects of the noncompetitive antagonist MK-801 on visually mediated, classic fear conditioning in goldfish (Carassius auratus). MK-801 was administered 30 min before the training session on Day 1 to look for anterograde amnestic effects, immediately after training to look for retrograde amnestic effects, and before the training or test session, or both, to look for state-dependence effects. Results show that MK-801 produced anterograde amnesia at doses that did not produce retrograde amnesia or state dependency and did not impair the expression of conditioned or unconditioned branchial suppression responses (BSRs) to the conditioned stimulus (CS). Results indicate that MK-801 disrupts the mechanism of learning of the CS–unconditioned stimulus (UCS) relation. Evidence is also presented that the learning processes that are disrupted by MK-801 occur during the initial stage of BSR conditioning. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2010 APA, all rights reserved)     

Conditioning with masked stimuli affects the timecourse of skin conductance responses.

In Pavlovian fear conditioning, an aversive unconditional stimulus (UCS) is repeatedly paired with a neutral conditional stimulus (CS). As a consequence, the subject begins to show conditional responses (CRs) to the CS that indicate expectation and fear. There are currently two general models competing to explain the role of subjective awareness in fear conditioning. Proponents of the single-process model assert that a single propositional learning process mediates CR expression and UCS expectancy. Proponents of a dual-process model assert that these behavioral responses are expressions of two independent learning processes. We used backward masking to block perception of our visual CSs and measured the effect of this training on subsequent unmasked performance. In two separate experiments we show a dissociation between CR expression and UCS expectancy following differential delay conditioning with masked CSs. In Experiment I, we show that masked training facilitates CR expression when the same CSs are presented during a subsequent unmasked reacquisition task. In Experiment II we show that masked training retards learning when the CS+ is presented as part of a compound CS during a subsequent unmasked blocking task. Our results suggest that multiple memory systems operate in a parallel, independent manner to encode emotional memories. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2010 APA, all rights reserved)     

Normal conditioning inhibition and extinction of freezing and fear-potentiated startle following electrolytic lesions of medial prefrontal cortex in rats.

The authors investigated the role of medial prefrontal cortex (mPFC) in the inhibition of conditioned fear in rats using both Pavlovian extinction and conditioned inhibition paradigms. In Experiment 1, lesions of ventral mPFC did not interfere with conditioned inhibition of the fear-potentiated startle response. In Experiment 2, lesions made after acquisition of fear conditioning did not retard extinction of fear to a visual conditioned stimulus (CS) and did not impair "reinstatement" of fear after unsignaled presentations of the unconditioned stimulus. In Experiment 3, lesions made before fear conditioning did not retard extinction of fear-potentiated startle or freezing to an auditory CS. In both Experiments 2 and 3, extinction of fear to contextual cues was also unaffected by the lesions. These results indicate that ventral mPFC is not essential for the inhibition of fear under a variety of circumstances. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2010 APA, all rights reserved)     

Acquired appetitive responding to intravenous nicotine reflects a Pavlovian conditioned association.

Recent research examining Pavlovian appetitive conditioning has extended the associative properties of nicotine from the unconditioned stimulus or reward to include the role of a conditional stimulus (CS), capable of acquiring the ability to evoke a conditioned response. To date, published research has used presession extravascular injections to examine nicotine as a contextual CS in that appetitive Pavlovian drug discrimination task. Two studies in the current research examined whether a nicotine CS can function discretely, multiple times within a session using passive iv infusions. In Experiment 1, rats readily acquired a discrimination in conditioned responding between nicotine and saline infusions when nicotine was selectively paired with sucrose presentations. In Experiment 2, rats were either trained with nicotine paired with sucrose or explicitly unpaired with sucrose. The results showed that rats trained with explicitly unpaired nicotine and sucrose did not increase dipper entries after the infusions. Nicotine was required to be reliably paired with sucrose for control of conditioned responding to develop. Implications of these findings are discussed in relation to tobacco addiction, learning theory, and pharmacology. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2010 APA, all rights reserved)     

Hippocampectomy disrupts auditory trace fear conditioning and contextual fear conditioning in the rat

The hippocampus is believed to be an important structure for learning tasks that require temporal processing of information. The trace classical conditioning paradigm requires temporal processing because the conditioned stimulus (CS) and the unconditioned stimulus (US) are temporally separated by an empty trace interval. The present study sought to determine whether the hippocampus was necessary for rats to perform a classical trace fear conditioning task in which each of 10 trials consisted of an auditory tone CS (1 5-s duration) followed by an empty 30-s trace interval and then a fear-producing floor-shock US (0.5-s duration). Several weeks prior to training, animals were anesthetized and given aspiration lesions of the neocortex (NEO; n = 6), hippocampus and overlying neocortex (HIPP; n = 7), or no lesions at all (control; n = 6). Approximately 24 h after trace conditioning, NEO and control animals showed a significant decrease in movement to a CS-alone presentation that was indicative of a conditioned fear response. Animals in the HIPP group did not show conditioned fear responses to the CS alone, nor did a pseudoconditioning group (n = 7) that was trained with unpaired CSs and USs. Furthermore, all groups except the HIPP group showed conditioned fear responses to the original context in which they received shock USs. One week later, HIPP, NEO, and control animals received delay fear-conditioning trials with no trace interval separating the CS and US. Six of seven HIPP animals could perform the delay version, but none could perform the trace version. This result suggests that the trace fear task is a reliable and useful model for examining the neural mechanisms of hippocampally dependent learning.     

Impact of continuous versus intermittent CS-UCS pairing on human brain activation during Pavlovian fear conditioning.

During Pavlovian fear conditioning a conditioned stimulus (CS) is repeatedly paired with an aversive unconditioned stimulus (UCS). In many studies the CS and UCS are paired on every trial, whereas in others the CS and UCS are paired intermittently. To better understand the influence of the CS-UCS pairing rate on brain activity, the experimenters presented continuously, intermittently, and non-paired CSs during fear conditioning. Amygdala, anterior cingulate, and fusiform gyrus activity increased linearly with the CS-UCS pairing rate. In contrast, insula and left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex responses were larger during intermittently paired CS presentations relative to continuously and non-paired CSs. These results demonstrate two distinct patterns of activity in disparate brain regions. Amygdala, anterior cingulate, and fusiform gyrus activity paralleled the CS-UCS pairing rate, whereas the insula and dorsolateral prefrontal cortex appeared to respond to the uncertainty inherent in intermittent CS-UCS pairing procedures. These findings may further clarify the role of these brain regions in Pavlovian fear conditioning. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2010 APA, all rights reserved)     

Associative regulation of Pavlovian fear conditioning: Unconditioned stimulus intensity, incentive shifts, and latent inhibition.

Conditional stimuli (CS) associated with painful unconditional stimuli (UCS) produce a naloxone-reversible analgesia. The analgesia serves as a negative-feedback regulation of fear conditioning that can account for the impact of UCS intensity and CS predictiveness on Pavlovian fear conditioning. In Exp 1, training under naloxone produced learning curves that approached the same high asymptote despite UCS intensity. Shifting drug treatment during acquisition had effects that paralleled UCS intensity shifts. In Exp 3, naloxone reversed Hall-Pearce (1979) negative transfer using a contextual CS, indicating that conditional analgesia acquired during the CS–weak-footshock phase retards acquisition in the CS–strong-footshock phase. Exp 5 used a tone CS in both a latent-inhibition and a negative-transfer procedure. Only negative transfer was blocked by naloxone. Therefore, negative transfer but not latent inhibition is mediated by a reduction of UCS processing. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2010 APA, all rights reserved)     

Conditional stimulus probability and activity of hippocampal, cingulate cortical, and limbic thalamic neurons during avoidance conditioning in rabbits.

Multi-unit and field potential responses in the anterior (AC) and posterior cingulate cortices (PC), dentate gyrus (DG), and anterior ventral (AV) and medial dorsal (MD) thalamic nuclei of rabbits were recorded during acquisition and performance of a locomotor conditioned response (CR). The CR, stepping in an activity wheel in response to a tone (conditioned stimulus [CS+]), prevented the occurrence of a shock unconditioned stimulus (UCS) scheduled 5 sec after CS+ onset. Ss also learned to ignore a different tone (CS–), not predictive of the UCS. Training was given daily until behavioral discrimination reached criterion. After criterion, asymmetric probability (AP) sessions were given that were the same as the conditioning session except for probability manipulation. A significant discriminative response developed in all regions during behavioral acquisition. The unit response in the AP session was enhanced in all areas by rare presentation of the CS–, compared with the equal and frequent CS– conditions. Rare presentation of the CS+ enhanced the unit response in the AC, PC, and DG, but it suppressed the firing of AV and MD neurons. Rare CS+ presentations did not alter AV and PC neuronal activity in Ss with subicular lesions. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2010 APA, all rights reserved)     

Temporal Encoding in Fear Conditioning Revealed Through Associative Reflex Facilitation.

[Correction Notice: An erratum for this article was reported in Vol 118(3) of Behavioral Neuroscience (see record 2007-16851-001). The article contained several errors. On page 396, second paragraph, the sentence beginning on line 6 should read as follows: "Having a stable baseline is critical for studies of reflex facilitation because the experimental designs invariably entail repetitive CR testing, if only to achieve reasonable statistical power (see Choi et al., 2001b; Lindquist & Brown, 2004)." On page 400, the first heading should read as follows: "Comparison of New and Old Reflex Facilitation Procedures". On page 400, the first sentence under the abovementioned heading should read as follows: "We decided not to use the original measure of reflex facilitation, developed by J. S. Brown et al. (1951), because it suffers from severe interpretational limitations, elaborated in detail elsewhere (Choi et al., 2001b; Leaton & Cranney, 1990; Lindquist & Brown, 2004)."] Temporal encoding in Pavlovian fear conditioning was examined through conditional facilitation of the short-latency (Rl) component of the rat eyeblink reflex. Rats were fear-conditioned to a tone conditional stimulus (CS) with either a 3- or 9-s interstimulus interval (ISI) between CS onset and the onset of the grid-shock unconditional stimulus (US). Rl facilitation was tested over 2 days, in counterbalanced order, at a latency of 3 s and 9 s from CS onset. CS-produced Rl facilitation, the conditional response (CR), was 3-4 times larger when the test latency equaled the conditioning ISI. These results, coupled with the known neurophysiology of Rl facilitation, suggest that this CR could disclose differences in the time course of CS-generated output from the amygdala when driven by cortical versus subcortical CS-CR pathways. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2010 APA, all rights reserved)     

NMDA receptor antagonist MK-801 blocks learning of conditioned stimulus-unconditioned stimulus contiguity but not fear of conditioned stimulus in goldfish (Carassius auratus L.).

The blockade of learning of Pavlovian fear conditioning by the N-methyl-D-aspartic acid (NMDA)-receptor antagonist MK-801 was examined in 166 goldfish. In previously untrained fish, MK-801 blocked learning of a light-off or a tone conditioned stimulus (CS) paired with an electrical shock unconditioned stimulus (UCS). Pretraining on the light-off CS did not affect the rate of learning of the tone CS but protected the tone learning from disruption by MK-801. Switching from the light-off to the tone CS changed the identity of the CS but not its temporal contiguity with the UCS. Pretraining consisting of pseudoconditioning of the light-off CS did not protect subsequent tone learning from blockade by MK-801. Thus, the NMDA receptor functions are necessary for learning related to the temporal contiguity of the CS and UCS but not to the identity of the CS as a cue to the occurrence of the fearful effects of the UCS. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2010 APA, all rights reserved)     

Opioid receptors in the midbrain periaqueductal gray regulate prediction errors during Pavlovian fear conditioning.

The authors used a within-subject blocking design to study the role of ventrolateral periaqueductal gray (v1PAG) opioid receptors in regulating prediction errors during Pavlovian fear conditioning. In Stage I, the authors trained rats to fear conditioned stimulus (CS) A by pairing it with shock. In Stage II, CSA and CSB were copresented and followed with shock. Two novel stimuli, CSC and CSD, were also copresented and followed with shock in Stage II. CSA blocked fear from accruing to CSB. Blocking was prevented by systemic pretreatment with naloxone. Blocking was also prevented in a dose-dependent and neuroanatomically specific fashion by vlPAG infusions of the μ-opioid receptor antagonist CTAP. These experiments show that v1PAG μ-opioid receptors contribute to Pavlovian fear learning by regulating predictive error. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2010 APA, all rights reserved)     

Central CRF receptor antagonist α-helical CRF9-41 blocks reinstatement of extinguished fear: The role of the bed nucleus of the stria terminalis.

The present experiments assessed the necessity of central CRF in reinstatement of extinguished fear. Using the fear-potentiated startle procedure, rats were given light-shock pairings (fear conditioning) followed by light-alone extinction training. Rats were then given unsignaled shocks to reinstate fear to the light conditioned stimulus (CS). Intracerebroventricular administration of the CRF antagonist α-Helical CRF9-41 prior to reinstatement training dose-dependently prevented reinstatement. Further, α-Helical CRF9-41 administration prior to reinstatement training or the test for reinstatement of fear to the extinguished CS prevented reinstatement at both treatment times, suggesting that CRF activity is critical for this type of return of fear to an extinguished CS. The abolition of reinstatement by drug administration was not due to state-dependent learning, as rats treated with the drug prior to both reinstatement training or testing also failed α-Helical CRF9-41 in the bed nucleus of the stria terminalis suggested that this area is a site at which central CRF is involved in this form of relapse. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2010 APA, all rights reserved)     

The effects of FG7142 on overexpectation of Pavlovian fear conditioning.

Six experiments studied the role of GABAA receptor activation in expression of overexpectation of Pavlovian fear conditioning. After separate pairings of CSA and CSB with shock in Stage I, rats received pairings of the compound AB with shock in Stage II, producing overexpectation of fear. The expression of overexpectation was attenuated, in a dose-dependent manner, by the benzodiazepine partial inverse agonist FG7142. FG7142 had no effect on responding to a CS paired with a low magnitude US or a CS subjected to associative blocking. These results suggest that the negative prediction error generated during overexpectation training may impose a mask on fear rather than erasing the original fear learning. They support claims that overexpectation shares features with extinction. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2010 APA, all rights reserved)     

Temporal location of unsignaled food deliveries: Effects on conditioned withdrawal (inhibition) in pigeon signtracking.

Standard models of Pavlovian conditioning neglect local effects of unsignaled unconditioned stimuli (USs) on learning and performance. Using the approach-withdrawal behavior of pigeons toward keylights as conditioned stimuli (CSs), the authors varied the specific times (5–210 s) that USs occurred before or after a CS. Withdrawal from a CS generally increased as the time between a US before and/or after the CS was lengthened. Combinations of 2 distant USs produced more withdrawal from the CS than either US alone, whereas combinations of a distant and a nearby US yielded behavior intermediate between that for either US alone. Postacquisition retardation tests supported similar conclusions. Based on the temporal isolation of CSs and USs, a tentative model was offered to summarize these data. The results and the model suggest that a more molecular, possibly perceptual approach to Pavlovian excitation and inhibition is needed. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2010 APA, all rights reserved)