High molecular weight poly( -lactide) and poly(ethylene oxide) blends: thermal characterization and physical properties

The miscibility of high molecular weight poly( -lactide) PLLA with high molecular weight poly(ethylene oxide) PEO was studied by differential scanning calorimetry. All blends containing up to 50 weight% PEO showed single glass transition temperatures. The PLLA and PEO melting temperatures were found to decrease on blending, the equilibrium melting points of PLLA in these blends decreased with increasing PEO fractions. These results suggest the miscibility of PLLA and PEO in the amorphous phase. Mechanical properties of blends with up to 20 weight% PEO were also studied. Changes in mechanical properties were small in blends with less than 10 weight% PEO. At higher PEO concentrations the materials became very flexible, an elongation at break of more than 500% was observed for a blend with 20 weight% PEO. Hydrolytic degradation up to 30 days of the blends showed only a small variation in tensile strength at PEO concentrations less than 15 weight%. As a result of the increased hydrophilicity, however, the blends swelled. Mass loss upon degradation was attributed to partial dissolution of the PEO fraction and to an increased rate of degradation of the PLLA fraction. Significant differences in degradation behaviour between PLLA/PEO blends and (PLLA/PEO/PLLA) triblock-copolymers were observed.     

Properties of crosslinked blends of pellethene and multiblock polyurethane containing poly(ethylene oxide) for biomaterials

A series of multiblock polyurethanes, containing various poly(ethylene oxide) (PEO; number‐average molecular weight = 400–3400) contents (0–80 wt %) and prepared from hexamethylene diisocyanate/PEO/poly(dimethylsiloxane) diol/polybutadiene diol/1,4‐butanediol, were used as modifying additives (30 wt %) to improve the properties of biomedical‐grade Pellethene. Different molecular weights of PEO were used to keep poly(ethylene glycol) at a fixed molar content, if possible, although the PEO content, related to the PEO block length in the multiblock polyurethanes, was varied from 0 to 80 wt %. The hydrophilic PEO component was introduced through the addition of PEO‐containing polyurethanes and dicumyl peroxide as a crosslinking agent in a Pellethene matrix. As the PEO content (PEO block length) increased, the hydrogen‐bonding fraction of the crosslinked Pellethene/multiblock polyurethane blends increased, and this indicated an increase in the phase separation with an increase in the PEO content in the crosslinked Pellethene/multiblock polyurethane blends. According to electron spectroscopy for chemical analysis, the ratio of ether carbon to alkyl carbon in the crosslinked Pellethene/multiblock polyurethane blends increased remarkably with increasing PEO content. The water contact angle of the crosslinked Pellethene/multiblock polyurethane blend film surfaces decreased with increasing PEO content. The water absorption and mechanical properties (tensile modulus, strength, and elongation at break) of the crosslinked Pellethene/multiblock polyurethane blend films increased with increasing PEO content. The platelet adhesion on the crosslinked Pellethene/multiblock polyurethane blend film surfaces decreased significantly with increasing PEO content. These results suggest that crosslinked Pellethene/multiblock polyurethane blends containing the hydrophilic component PEO may have potential for biomaterials that come into direct contact with blood. © 2003 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 91: 2348–2357, 2004     

Miscibility of C60-end-capped poly(ethylene oxide) with poly(vinyl chloride)

The miscibility of blends of single [60]fullerene (C₆₀)-end-capped poly(ethylene oxide) (FPEO) or double C₆₀-end-capped poly(ethylene oxide) (FPEOF) with poly(vinyl chloride) (PVC) has been studied. Similar to poly(ethylene oxide) (PEO), both FPEO and FPEOF are also miscible with PVC over the entire composition range. X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy showed the development of a new low-binding-energy Cl2p doublet and a new high-binding-energy O1s peak in FPEO/PVC blends. The results show that the miscibility between FPEO and PVC arises from hydrogen bonding interaction between the α-hydrogen of PVC and the ether oxygen of FPEO. From the melting point depression of PEO, FPEO or FPEOF in the blends, the Flory-Huggins interaction parameters were found to be −0.169, −0.142, −0.093 for PVC/PEO, PVC/FPEO and PVC/FPEOF, respectively, demonstrating that all the three blend systems are miscible in the melt. However, the incorporation of C₆₀ slightly impairs the interaction between PEO and PVC.     

Study of the miscibility and crystallization behavior of poly(ethylene oxide)/poly(vinyl alcohol) blends

The miscibility and crystallization behavior of poly(ethylene oxide)/poly(vinyl alcohol) (PEO/PVA) blends were investigated by differential scanning calorimetry (DSC), dynamic mechanical analysis (DMA), and polarizing optical microscopy. Because the glass‐transition temperature of PVA was near the melting point of PEO crystalline, an uncommon DSC procedure was used to determine the glass‐transition temperature of the PVA‐rich phase. From the DSC and DMA results, two glass‐transition temperatures, which corresponded to the PEO‐rich phase and the PVA‐rich phase, were observed. It was an important criterion to indicate that a blend was immiscible. It was also found that the preparation method of samples influenced the morphology and crystallization behaviors of PEO/PVA blends. The domain size of the disperse phase (PVA‐rich) for the solution‐cast blends was much larger than that for the coprecipitated blends. The crystallinity, spherulitic morphology, and isothermal crystallization behavior of PEO in the solution‐cast blends were similar to those of the neat PEO. On the contrary, these properties in the coprecipitated blends were different from those of the neat PEO. © 2004 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 92: 1562–1568, 2004     

Characterization and properties of poly(ethylene oxide) and its blends with poly (N-vinyl carbazole)

The calorimetric properties and dynamic mechanical behaviour of pure poly(ethylene oxide) (PEO) and its blends with poly(N-vinyl carbazole) (PNVK) have been examined as a function of composition in the range 50-100% PEO. Thermomechanical measurements indicate the presence of a phase separation in this blend. Using the Hoffman-Weeks plot no equilibrium melting point depression was found in any of the blends studied. Some kinetic interfacial effects were detected in the crystallization processes. For all blend compositions, the Avrami exponent is close to that obtained for pure PEO. The DMTA and DTA results suggest an incompatibility in this system.     

High molecular weight poly(l-lactide) and poly(ethylene oxide) blends: thermal characterization and physical properties

The miscibility of high molecular weight poly(l-lactide) PLLA with high molecular weight poly(ethylene oxide) PEO was studied by differential scanning calorimetry. All blends containing up to 50 weight% PEO showed single glass transition temperatures. The PLLA and PEO melting temperatures were found to decrease on blending, the equilibrium melting points of PLLA in these blends decreased with increasing PEO fractions. These results suggest the miscibility of PLLA and PEO in the amorphous phase. Mechanical properties of blends with up to 20 weight% PEO were also studied. Changes in mechanical properties were small in blends with less than 10 weight% PEO. At higher PEO concentrations the materials became very flexible, an elongation at break of more than 500% was observed for a blend with 20 weight% PEO. Hydrolytic degradation up to 30 days of the blends showed only a small variation in tensile strength at PEO concentrations less than 15 weight%. As a result of the increased hydrophilicity, however, the blends swelled. Mass loss upon degradation was attributed to partial dissolution of the PEO fraction and to an increased rate of degradation of the PLLA fraction. Significant differences in degradation behaviour between PLLA/PEO blends and (PLLA/PEO/PLLA) triblock-copolymers were observed.     

Formation of banded and non-banded poly(l-lactic acid) spherulites during crystallization of films of poly(l-lactic acid)/poly(ethylene oxide) blends

In this study, a series of poly(l-lactic acid) (PLLA)/poly(ethylene oxide) (PEO) blends with different PLLA concentrations was prepared. Films of these blends crystallized with and without a coverslip were characterized by the presence and absence of banded structures, respectively. This difference in morphology was observed because the PEO component of the blends was oxidized at a high temperature (125 °C) in air without the protection of a coverslip. X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) results showed that the surface of the blends crystallized in nitrogen without a coverslip contained mostly PLLA while the surfaces of the same blends crystallized under a coverslip contained only a moderately higher concentration of PLLA than their bulks. The migration of PLLA to the surface of the blends during crystallization in nitrogen when no coverslip was used was due to its low surface tension. Phase images obtained using atomic force microscopy (AFM) indicated that the banded structures consisted of valleys and ridges, which were in fact flat-on and edge-on lamellae, respectively. A detailed time-of-flight secondary ion mass spectrometry (ToF-SIMS) examination suggested that PLLA and PEO were located mainly on the surfaces of the ridges and valleys, respectively.     

Poly(hydroxyether sulfone) and its blends with poly(ethylene oxide): miscibility, phase behavior and hydrogen bonding interactions

Poly(hydroxyether sulfone) (PHES) was synthesized through polycondensation of bisphenol S with epichlorohydrin. It was characterized by Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR), nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy and differential scanning calorimetry (DSC). The miscibility in the blends of PHES with poly(ethylene oxide) (PEO) was established on the basis of the thermal analysis results. DSC showed that the PHES/PEO blends prepared by casting from N,N-dimethylformamide (DMF) possessed single, composition-dependent glass transition temperatures (T_gs), indicating that the blends are miscible in amorphous state. At elevated temperatures, the PHES/PEO blends underwent phase separation. The phase behavior was investigated by optical microscope and the cloud point curve was determined. A typical lower critical solution temperature behavior was observed in the moderate temperature range for this blend system. FTIR studies indicate that there are the competitive hydrogen bonding interactions upon adding PEO to the system, which was involved with the intramolecular and intermolecular hydrogen bonding interactions, i.e. -OH?OS, -OH?-OH and -OH versus ether oxygen atoms of PEO between PHES and PEO. In terms of the infrared spectroscopic investigation, it is judged that from weak to strong the strength of the hydrogen bonding interactions is in the following order: -OH?OS, -OH?-OH and -OH versus ether oxygen atoms of PEO.     

Poly(ethylene oxide) and its blends with sodium alginate

A series of blends based on poly(ethylene oxide) (PEO) and sodium alginate (NaAlg) were prepared by solution casting method. The blends thus obtained were characterized by using Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FT-IR), thermogravimetric analysis (TGA), differential scanning calorimetry (DSC), tensile strength test, contact angle measurements and atomic force microscopy (AFM). FT-IR studies indicate that there are the hydrogen bonding interactions due to the ether oxygen of PEO and the hydroxyl groups of NaAlg. The thermal stability of the blends was slightly affected with increasing NaAlg content. DSC results showed that both melting point and crystallinity depend on the composition of the blends. Mechanical properties of the blend films were improved compared to those of homopolymers. Surface free energy components of the blend films were calculated from contact angle data of various liquids by using Van Oss-Good methodology. It was found that the surfaces both of the blends are enriched in low surface free energy component, i.e. NaAlg. This conclusion was further confirmed by the AFM images observation of the surface morphology of these blends.     

Solution and solid state nuclear magnetic resonance investigation of poly(methylmethacrylate)/ poly(ethylene oxide) blends

It is well known that nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy (NMR) is a powerful method to characterize blends compatibility at the molecular level. In this work binary blends formed by poly(methylmethacrylate)/poly(ethylene oxide), PMMA/PEO, were investigated by different solution and solid state NMR techniques to obtain information on blends homogeneity and compatibility. It was characterized that the values of T₁^Hρ obtained by variable contact time and delayed contact time experiments, for each composition, were distinct and this fact suggests that regions with different molecular mobilities exist, as a consequence of blending interaction. © 2003 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 90: 2955–2958, 2003     

Toughening of polypropylene with crystallizable poly(ethylene oxide)

A crystallizable polymer, poly(ethylene oxide) (PEO), was used as new modifier to tailor the toughness of isotactic polypropylene (iPP). An optimum performance was achieved at a medium PEO content of 15 wt% where the toughness was enhanced by 300%, while the strength only decreased slightly. To elucidate the origin of toughening in the iPP/PEO blends, various crystallographic and morphological experiments including X‐ray diffraction, electron microscopy and calorimetry were adopted to explore the dependences of polymorphic composition and crystallized morphology on PEO content. When the PEO content is less than 15 wt%, the dispersed PEO cannot crystallize, and these non‐crystalline PEO microspheres are embedded in both α‐ and β‐form iPP spherulites, which is mainly responsible for the toughening. In contrast, when the PEO content is higher than 15 wt%, the PEO phase becomes crystallizable, and significant phase segregation takes place, resulting in a marked deterioration in mechanical properties. Copyright © 2011 Society of Chemical Industry     

Tacticity effects on the miscibility behavior of poly(methyl methacrylate)/poly(ethylene oxide-b-dimethylsiloxane-b-ethylene oxide) blends

The miscibility of a triblock copolymer poly(ethylene oxide)-poly(dimethylsiloxane)-poly(ethylene oxide) with syndiotactic and isotactic poly(methylmethacrylate) wasstudied. Although isotactic poly(methyl methacrylate) (PMMA) was miscible with poly(ethylene oxide) (PEO) in the pure state, it was immiscible with the PEO end blocks in the copolymer. In comparison, the syndiotactic poly(methyl methacrylate) (sPMMA) was miscible with the PEO blocks as indicated by melting point depression, decrease in crystallinity, and slower rate of spherulite growth of PEO. When blends of the triblock copolymer were cooled to low temperatures, the poly(dimethylsiloxane) (PDMS) middle block which resided in the interlamellar region of PEO spherulites also crystallized; the development of PDMS crystals was clearly suppressed at high sPMMA contents.On leave from Union Chemical Laboratories, Industrial Technology Research Institute, Hsinchu, Taiwan     

Miscibility and crystallization in crystalline/crystalline blends of poly(butylene succinate)/poly(ethylene oxide)

Miscibility and crystallization behavior have been investigated in blends of poly(butylene succinate) (PBSU) and poly(ethylene oxide) (PEO), both semicrystalline polymers, by differential scanning calorimetry and optical microscopy. Experimental results indicate that PBSU is miscible with PEO as shown by the existence of single composition dependent glass transition temperature over the entire composition range. In addition, the polymer-polymer interaction parameter, obtained from the melting depression of the high-T_m component PBSU using the Flory-Huggins equation, is composition dependent, and its value is always negative. This indicates that PBSU/PEO blends are thermodynamically miscible in the melt. The morphological study of the isothermal crystallization at 95 °C (where only PBSU crystallized) showed the similar crystallization behavior as in amorphous/crystalline blends. Much more attention has been paid to the crystallization and morphology of the low-T_m component PEO, which was studied through both one-step and two-step crystallization. It was found that the crystallization of PEO was affected clearly by the presence of the crystals of PBSU formed through different crystallization processes. The two components crystallized sequentially not simultaneously when the blends were quenched from the melt directly to 50 °C (one-step crystallization), and the PEO spherulites crystallized within the matrix of the crystals of the preexisted PBSU phase. Crystallization at 95 °C followed by quenching to 50 °C (two-step crystallization) also showed the similar crystallization behavior as in one-step crystallization. However, the radial growth rate of the PEO spherulites was reduced significantly in two-step crystallization than in one-step crystallization.     

Miscibility and crystallization of poly(ethylene oxide) and poly(ε-caprolactone) blends

Blends of poly(ethylene oxide) (PEO) with poly(ε-caprolactone) (PCL), both semicrystalline polymers, were prepared by co-dissolving the two polyesters in chloroform and casting the mixture. Phase contrast microscopy was used to probe the miscibility of PEOB/PCL blends. Experimental results indicated that PEO was immiscible with PCL because the melt was biphasic. Crystallization of PEO/PCL blends was studied by differential scanning calorimetry and analyzed by the Avrami equation. The crystallization rate of PEO decreased with the increase of PCL in the blends while the crystallization mechanism did not change. In the case of the isothermal crystallization of PCL, the crystallization mechanism did not change, and the change in the crystallization rate was not very big, or almost constant with the addition of PEO, compared with the change of the crystallization rate of PEO.     

Miscibility and phase behavior in thermosetting blends of polybenzoxazine and poly(ethylene oxide)

Thermosetting polymer blends composed of polybenzoxazine (PBA-a) and poly(ethylene oxide) (PEO) were prepared via in situ curing reaction of benzoxazine (BA-a) in the presence of PEO, which started from the initially homogeneous mixtures of BA-a and PEO. Before curing, the BA-a/PEO blends displayed the single and composition-dependant glass transition temperatures (T_g's) in the entire blend composition, and the equilibrium melting point depression was also observed in the blends. It is judged that the BA-a/PEO blends are completely miscible. The miscibility was mainly ascribed to the contribution of entropy to mixing free energy since the molecular weight of BA-a is rather low. However, phase separation occurred after curing reaction at the elevated temperature, which was confirmed by differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) and scanning electronic microscopy (SEM). It was expected that the PBA-a/PEO blends would be miscible since PBA-a possesses a great number of phenolic hydroxyls in the molecular backbone, which are potential to form the intermolecular hydrogen bonding interactions with oxygen atoms of PEO and thus would fulfill the miscibility of the blends. To interpret the experimental results, we investigated the variable temperature Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR) of the blends via model compound. The FTIR results indicate that the phenolic hydroxyl groups could not form the efficient intermolecular hydrogen bonding interactions at the elevated temperatures (e.g. the curing temperatures), i.e. the phenolic hydroxyl groups existed mainly in the non-associated form in the system. Therefore, the decrease of the mixing entropy still dominates the phase behavior of thermosetting blends at the elevated temperature.     

NMR study of poly(vinylpyrrolidone)/poly(ethylene oxide) blends

Development of polymeric blends has become very important for polymer industries because they have been shown to be successful and versatile alternatives to obtain new polymers. In this work binary blends formed by poly(vinylpyrrolidone) (PVP) and poly(ethylene oxide) (PEO) were studied by solution and solid‐state NMR to determine their physical interaction, homogeneity, and compatibility for use as membranes to separate water/alcohol. The NMR results allowed us to acquire information on the microstructure and molecular dynamic behavior of polymer blends. From the NMR solution it was possible to evaluate the microstructure: PVP presented a preferential syndiotactic distribution sequence and PEO presented two regions, one crystalline and the other amorphous. Considering the solid‐state NMR results it was possible to evaluate the molecular dynamics and all binary blends, showing that PEO behaves as a plasticizer; some intermolecular interaction was also observed. An important point was to evaluate the microstructure of the carbonyl PVP using cross polarization/magic‐angle spinning (CP/MAS) and CP/MAS/dipolar decoupling that was not observed before. © 2002 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 85: 2820–2823, 2002     

Crystalline structures in ultrathin poly(ethylene oxide)/poly(methyl methacrylate) blend films

Amorphous poly(ethylene oxide)/poly(methyl methacrylate) (PEO/PMMA) blend films in extremely constrained states are meta-stable and phase separation of fractal-like branched patterns happens in them due to heterogeneously nucleated PEO crystallization by diffusion-limited aggregation. The crystalline branches are viewed flat-on with PEO chains oriented normal to the substrate surface, upon increasing PMMA content the branch width remains invariant but thickness increases. It is revealed that PMMA imposes different effects on PEO crystallization, i.e. the length and thickness of branches, depending on the film composition.     

Phase behavior of aqueous systems containing block copolymers of poly(ethylene oxide) and poly(propylene oxide)

Phase behavior of aqueous systems containing block copolymers of poly(ethylene oxide (PEO) and poly(propylene oxide) (PPO) was evaluated by building up temperature-concentration phase diagrams. We have studied bifunctional triblock copolymers (HO-PEO-PPO-PEO-OH) and monofunctional diblock copolymers (R-PEO-PPO-OH and R-PPO-PEO-OH, where R length is linear C₄ and C_12–14). The cloud points of the polymer solutions depended on EO/PO ratio, polarity, R length and position of the hydrophilic and hydrophobic segments along the molecule. Such factors influence on the solutions behavior was also analyzed in terms of critical micelle concentration (CMC), which was obtained from surface tension vs. concentration plots. Salts (NaCl and KCl) added into the polymer solutions change the solvent polarity decreasing the cloud points. On the other hand, the cloud points of the polymer solutions increased as a hydrotrope (sodium p-toluenesulfonate) was added. © 1997 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 66: 1767–1772, 1997     

A glow discharge treatment to immobilize poly(ethylene oxide)/poly(propylene oxide) surfactants for wettable and non-fouling biomaterials

A non-fouling (protein resistant) polymer surface was achieved using an argon glow discharge treatment of a polyethylene surface which had been precoated with various poly(ethylene oxide)/poly(propylene oxide)/poly(ethylene oxide) (PEO-PPO-PEO) tri-block copolymer surfactants. The surfactant is first deposited on the polymer surface via a solvent swelling and evaporation method. Then the coated surfactant is immobilized on the substrate surface by an inert gas discharge treatment. ESCA and water contact angle () measurements on treated and solvent washed surfaces show significant increases in both surface O/C ratios and surface water wettability (0 < 30°) compared to LDPE control surfaces, revealing the presence of PEO on the treated surfaces. A great reduction of fibrinogen adsorption on the modified surfaces is also observed for the highest PEO content surfactants. This simple surface modification process may have wide applicability to obtain wettable polymer surfaces in general, and non-fouling biomaterial surfaces in specific.     

Probing the structure of polymer blends by vibrational spectroscopy: the case of poly(ethylene oxide) and poly(methyl methacrylate) blends

The blends of poly(ethylene oxide) (PEO) and poly(methyl methacrylate) (PMMA) are prepared in the form of thin films from solution casting. The Fourier transform infrared spectra of the blends are recorded in the spectral range 400–4000 cm^?1. The spectra are analysed using various recent techniques of vibrational spectroscopy. It is concluded that upon blending PEO takes preferentially a planar zig-zag structure. Furthermore the intermolecular interactions between the molecules of PEO and PMMA in blends are very weak and their compatibility as blends is more ‘physical’ than ‘chemical’. Further, on the basis of the atomic charges transferred from model molecules it is seen that the blending is preferred with isotactic PMMA when compared to syndiotactic PMMA.