Compatibilizers for thermotropic liquid crystalline polymer/polyolefin blends prepared by reactive mixing: The effect of processing conditions

The effect of processing conditions on the melt formation of a graft‐copolymer compatibilizer for blends of a thermotropic liquid crystalline polymer (TLCP) and polyolefins was investigated. The compatibilizer was formed by a melt acidolysis reaction of a 50/50 (w/w) blend of TLCP and the sodium salt of a poly(ethylene‐coacrylic acid) ionomer. The effects of various processing conditions in a batch mixer and a single‐screw extruder on the extent of reaction were assessed. The extent of graft‐copolymer formation and the efficacy of the product as a compatibilizer for TLCP/polyethylene blends were affected by the processing temperature and the screw (or rotor) speed.     

Use of zinc‐neutralized ethylene/methacrylic acid copolymer ionomers as blend compatibilizers for nylon 6 and low‐density polyethylene

The effect of the composition on the morphologies and properties of uncompatibilized and compatibilized blends of nylon 6 and low‐density polyethylene were studied over a wide range of weight fractions. The uncompatibilized blends had substantially reduced mechanical properties after mixing, and this was almost certainly due to poor interfacial adhesion between the two polymers. The addition of a zinc‐neutralized poly(ethylene‐co‐methacrylic acid) ionomer (Surlyn® 9020) as a compatibilizer improved the mechanical properties in comparison with those of the material blended without the compatibilizer. The clearest evidence of this improvement came from dynamic mechanical studies; for selected blends with high polyethylene contents, the drop in the modulus corresponding to the transition of a solid to a melt occurred at higher temperatures with the added compatibilizer. This improvement in the properties was accompanied by a reduction in the dispersed‐phase size due to the interaction between the ionic part of the ionomer and the amide groups of nylon 6, especially when nylon 6 was the dispersed phase of the blend. © 2003 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 89: 620–629, 2003     

Interfacially compatibilized LDPE/POE blends reinforced with nanoclay: investigation of morphology,rheology and dynamic mechanical properties

Morphological, melt rheological and dynamic mechanical properties of low-density polyethylene (LDPE)/ethylene–octene copolymer (POE)/organo-montmorillonite (OMMT) nanocomposites, prepared via melt compounding were studied. The XRD traces indicated different levels of intercalated structures for the nanocomposites. Addition of a compatibilizer (PE-g-MA) improved the intercalation process. TEM results revealed existence of clay layers in both phases but they were mainly localized in the elastomeric POE phase. Addition of 5 wt% OMMT to the LDPE/POE blend led to reduction in the size of the elastomer particles confirmed by AFM. The complex viscosity and storage modulus showed little effect of the presence of the clay when no compatibilizer was added. As the extent of exfoliation increased with addition of compatibilizer, the linear viscoelastic behavior of the composites gradually changed specially at low-frequency regions. The interfacially compatibilized nanocomposites with 5 wt% OMMT had the highest melt viscosity and modulus among all the studied nanocomposites and blends. Also, this particular composition showed the best improvement in dynamic storage modulus. The results indicated that clay dispersion and interfacial adhesion, and consequently different properties of LDPE/POE/clay nanocomposites, are greatly affected by addition of compatibilizer.     

Phase structure and viscoelastic properties of compatibilized blends of PET and HDPE recyclates

Immiscible blends of recycled poly(ethylene terephthalate) (R‐PET), containing some amount of polymeric impurities, and high‐density polyethylene (R‐PE), containing admixture of other polyolefins, in weight compositions of 75 : 25 and 25 : 75 were compatibilized with selected compatibilizers: maleated styrene–ethylene/butylene–styrene block copolymer (SEBS‐g‐MA) and ethylene–glycidyl methacrylate copolymer (EGMA). The efficiency of compatibilization was investigated as a function of the compatibilizer content. The rheological properties, phase structure, thermal, and viscoelastic behavior for compatibilized and binary blends were studied. The results are discussed in terms of phase morphology and interfacial adhesion among components. It was shown that the addition of the compatibilizer to R‐PET‐rich blends and R‐PE‐rich blends increases the melt viscosity of these systems above the level characteristic for the respective binary blends. The dispersion of the minor phase improved with increasing compatibilizer content, and the largest effects were observed for blends compatibilized with EGMA. Calorimetric studies indicated that the presence of a compatibilizer had a slight affect on the crystallization behavior of the blends. The dynamic mechanical analysis provided evidence that the occurrence of interactions of the compatibilizer with blend components occurs through temperature shift and intensity change of a β‐relaxation process of the PET component. An analysis of the loss spectra behavior suggests that the optimal concentration of the compatibilizers in the considered blends is close to 5 wt %. © 2001 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 82: 1423–1436, 2001     

Effect of compatibilizer in acrylonitrile‐butadiene‐styrene toughened nylon 6 blends: Ductile–brittle transition temperature

The ductile–brittle transition temperatures were determined for compatibilized nylon 6/acrylonitrile‐butadiene‐styrene (PA6/ABS) copolymer blends. The compatibilizers used for those blends were methyl methacrylate‐co‐maleic anhydride (MMA‐MAH) and MMA‐co‐glycidyl methacrylate (MMA‐GMA). The ductile–brittle transition temperatures were found to be lower for blends compatibilized through maleate modified acrylic polymers. At room temperature, the PA6/ABS binary blend was essentially brittle whereas the ternary blends with MMA‐MAH compatibilizer were supertough and showed a ductile–brittle transition temperature at ?10°C. The blends compatibilized with maleated copolymer exhibited impact strengths of up to 800 J/m. However, the blends compatibilized with MMA‐GMA showed poor toughness at room temperature and failed in a brittle manner at subambient temperatures. © 2003 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 90: 2643–2647, 2003     

Synthesis and evaluation of compatibilizer based on interpenetrating polymer networks (IPN) for PET/LDPE blends

The present work considers the evaluation of recycled polymers, which are generally incompatible and are degraded during recycling with fatal consequences to their thermal and mechanical properties. Regarding this subject, the synthesis of a new compatibilizer in network form was carried out in order to counter such incompatibility. In this sense, low density polyethylene (LDPE) and poly(ethylene terephthalate) (PET) were compatibilized via the implementation of an interpenetrating polymer network (IPN), which was specifically synthesized to possess chemical groups that are akin to both plastics, PET and LDPE. The effects of the relative amount of poly(acrylic acid) (PAA) in the compatibilizer and the amount in the blends of PET/LDPE were evaluated. The results show that mechanical properties and interfacial adhesion of PET/LDPE blends were modified and improved with the addition of the synthesized compatibilizer compared with a commercial compatibilizer (polyethylene grafted with maleic anhydride, PE‐g‐AA). © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2016 , 133, 43704.     

Potential role of nanofillers as compatibilizers in immiscible PLA/LDPE Blends

This article describes the use of commercial silica (SiO₂) and calcium carbonate (CaCO₃) nanofillers as compatibilizers in immiscible polylactide/low‐density polyethylene (PLA/LDPE) blends. The general aim of the study was to investigate the possibilities of replacing standard commodity plastics such as LDPE based on non‐renewable mineral oil resources with the biodegradable renewable polymer PLA in compatibilized PLA/LDPE blends for use in the packaging industry. The calculations of the minimal interfacial energy and optimal wetting abilities indicated that SiO₂ filler was a better potential compatibilizer than CaCO₃ for a given PLA/LDPE blend. This was due to its preferential localization at the interface. The significantly improved morphology of the ternary PLA/LDPE/SiO₂ blend was found to present an increased strength, toughness, and crystallinity. © 2014 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2015 , 132, 41414.     

Comparison of olefin copolymers as compatibilizers for polypropylene and high‐density polyethylene

Some polyolefin elastomers were compared as compatibilizers for blends of polypropylene (PP) with 30 wt % high‐density polyethylene (HDPE). The compatibilizers included a multiblock ethylene–octene copolymer (OBC), two statistical ethylene–octene copolymers (EO), two propylene–ethylene copolymers (P/E), and a styrenic block copolymer (SBC). Examination of the blend morphology by AFM showed that the compatibilizer was preferentially located at the interface between the PP matrix and the dispersed HDPE particles. The brittle‐to‐ductile (BD) transition was determined from the temperature dependence of the blend toughness, which was taken as the area under the stress–strain curve. All the compatibilized blends had lower BD temperature than PP. However, the blend compatibilized with OBC had the best combination of low BD temperature and high toughness. Examination of the deformed blends by scanning electron microscopy revealed that in the best blends, the compatibilizer provided sufficient interfacial adhesion so that the HDPE domains were able to yield and draw along with the PP matrix. © 2009 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci, 2009     

Effect of compatibilizer on the crystallization,rheological, and tensile properties of LDPE/EVOH blends

The effect of the compatibilizer on the crystallization, rheological, and tensile properties of low-density polyethylene (LDPE)/ethylene vinyl alcohol (EVOH) (70/30) blends was investigated. Maleic anhydride-grafted linear low-density polyethylene (LLD-g-MAH) was used as the compatibilizer in various concentrations (from 1 to 12 phr). The interesting effect of compatibilization on the crystallization kinetics of the blends was noted, and the correlation between the morphology and the rheological and tensile properties was also discussed. Morphological analysis showed that the blends exhibited a regular and finer dispersion of the EVOH phase when LLD-g-MAH was added. Nonisothermal crystallization exotherms of the compatibilized LDPE/EVOH blends showed the retarded crystallization of the dispersed EVOH phase, which probably resulted from the constraint effect of the grafted EVOH (EVOH-g-LLD) as well as the size reduction of the EVOH domains. The blends exhibited increased melt viscosity and storage modulus and also enhanced tensile properties with the addition of LLD-g-MAH, which seemed to be attributable to both dispersed particle-size reduction and improved interfacial adhesion. © 1998 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 68: 1245–1256, 1998     

Interfacial tension of compatibilized blends of LDPE and PA6: the breaking thread method

The interfacial tension of the uncompatibilized and compatibilized blends of low density polyethylene (LDPE) and polyamide 6 (PA6) has been measured by the breaking thread method. Different types of compatibilizer precursors have been used: poly(ethylene-co-acrylic acid) (Escor 5001, by Exxon) having 6 wt% concentration of acrylic acid; an ethylene-acrylic acid zinc ionomer (Iotek 4200); a triblock copolymer with polystyrene end blocks and a rubbery poly(ethylene–butylene mid block (SEBS) (Kraton G 1652); and SEBS-g-MA (Kraton FG 1901X) with 2 wt% maleic anhydride. The compatibilizing efficiency of the different types of the compatibilizer precursors towards the blends has been evaluated quantitatively by the values of the interfacial tension obtained. It has been shown that Iotek and SEBS-g-MA posses the highest compatibilizing efficiency, demonstrated by the strongest decrease of the interfacial tension and the dimension of the droplets of the dispersed phase. Contrary, SEBS almost does not influence the interfacial tension and the size of the particles. Hence, it possesses the lowest compatibilizing activity towards the blends. The compatibilizer Escor displays an activity lower than that of Iotek and SEBS-g-MA, but it is higher than that of SEBS.     

Blends of poly(ethylene terephthalate) and low density polyethylene containing aluminium: A material obtained from packaging recycling

Composites of polyethylene and aluminium (PEAL) may be obtained from the recycling of postconsumed Tetra Pak aseptic packaging. The components of the composite are low density polyethylene (LDPE), aluminium and an ethylene‐methacrylic acid random copolymer (EMAA). The presence of metallic filler and a functionalized copolymer, which may act as a compatibilizer, suggests that blending PEAL with other thermoplastic would be a way to obtain reinforced and compatibilized blends from recycled materials. Blends of PEAL and recycled poly(ethylene terephthalate) (PET) were prepared in the compositions of 30, 50, and 70 wt % of PET in a twin‐screw extruder. Blends of PET/LDPE and PET/EMAA were also prepared for comparison. The morphological analysis showed that the PET/PEAL blends present an excellent interfacial adhesion, similar to the PET/EMAA blend. The improvement of adhesion in comparison with the PET/LDPE blend is a result of the interaction between polar groups of PET and EMAA. PET/PEAL blends presented lower elongation at break and impact strength than the other blends whereas Young modulus was higher. © 2007 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 2007     

Oxidative degradations of oxodegradable LDPE enhanced with thermoplastic pea starch: Thermo‐mechanical properties,morphology, and UV‐ageing studies

The abiotic UV‐degradation behavior of oxodegradable LDPE was investigated in the presence of thermoplastic pea starch (TPPS) in this study. Oxodegradable LDPE was first melt‐blended with thermoplastic pea starch (TPPS) using an internal mixing chamber to enhance the abiotic oxidative degradation of oxodegradable LDPE. Because of their different affinity, maleated polyethylene was added as compatibilizer. Tensile properties, thermal properties, and morphology of resulting melt‐blends were determined at different content in TPPS. High content in TPPS (40 wt %) could be readily added to oxodegradable LDPE without affecting the tensile properties of resulting melt‐blends. UV‐ageing studies on compatibilized TPPS/oxodegradable LDPE melt‐blends were carried out by Attenuated Total Reflectance infrared spectroscopy (ATR‐FTIR), Dynamic Thermomechanical Analyses (DMTA) and Differential Scanning Calorimetry (DSC) under abiotic conditions. These results suggested a synergistic effect on the UV‐ageing of TPPS‐based melt‐blends provided by both components during the first stage of UV‐irradiation. © 2011 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci, 2011.     

Melt rheology of compatibilized polystyrene/low density polyethylene blends

Investigations have been made on the melt rheological behaviors of compatibilized blends composed of polystyrene, low density polyethylene and hydrogenated (styrene‐butadiene‐styrene) triblock copolymer used as a compatibilizer. The experiments were carried out on a capillary rheometer. The effects of shear stress, temperature and blending ratio on the activation energy for viscous flow and melt viscosity of the blends are described. The study shows that the viscosity of the blends exhibits a maximum or minimum value at a certain blending ratio. The activation energy for viscous flow decreases with increasing LDPE content. Furthermore, the concept of equal‐viscosity temperature is presented and its role in the processing of the blend is discussed. In addition, the morphology of the extrudate sample of the blends was observed by scanning electron microscopy and the correlation between the morphology and the rheological properties is explored. © 1999 Society of Chemical Industry     

Rheological,thermal, and morphological properties of ABS–PA1010 blends

Noncompatibilized and compatibilized ABS–nylon1010 blends were prepared by melt mixing. Polystyrene and glycidyl methacrylate (SG) copolymer was used as a compatibilizer to enhance the interfacial adhesion and to control the morphology. This SG copolymer contains reactive glycidyl groups that are able to react with PA1010 end groups ( NH₂ or  COOH) under melt conditions to form SG‐g‐Nylon copolymer. Effects of the compatibilizer SG on the rheological, thermal, and morphological properties were investigated by capillary rheometer, DSC, and SEM techniques. The compatibilized ABS–PA1010 blend has higher viscosity, lower crystallinity, and smaller phase domain compared to the corresponding noncompatibilized blend. © 1999 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 72: 683–688, 1999     

Comparative study of different maleic anhydride grafted compatibilizer precursors towards LDPE/PA6 blends: Morphology and mechanical properties

The study deals with the effectiveness of maleic anhydride grafted styrene-b-ethylene-co-propylene copolymer (SEPMA) as compatibilizer precursor (CP) for blends of low density polyethylene (LDPE) with polyamide-6 (PA). The CP was produced by grafting MA onto SEP in the melt. The specific interactions between the CP and the blends components have been investigated through characterizations of the binary LDPE/CP and PA/CP blends. The compatibilizing efficiency of the MA-grafted SEP, as revealed by the thermal properties and the morphology of the compatibilized blends, has been shown to be excellent. The morphology, as well as the mechanical properties of the compatibilized with SEPMA 75/25 w/w and 25/75 w/w LDPE/PA6 blends have been compared with those of the blends compatibilized with maleic anhydride functionalized HDPE sample (1-HDPE-g-MA) and with a commercial maleic anhydride grafted styrene-b-(ethylene-co-1-butene)-b-styrene copolymer (SEBSMA1). The results show that the strong compatibilizing efficiency of SEPMA is comparable with that of SEBSMA1, while 1-HDPE-g-MA exhibits a slightly lower activity, particularly for the blends, in which PA is the matrix phase.     

Influence of a compatibilizer on the properties of polyethylene–octene elastomer/starch blends

The effect of a compatibilizer on the properties of corn starch‐reinforced metallocene polyethylene–octene elastomer (POE) blends was studied. The compatibility between POE and starch was improved markedly with an acrylic acid‐grafted POE (POE‐g‐AA) copolymer as a compatibilizer. Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy, X‐ray diffraction spectroscopy, differential scanning calorimetry, and scanning electron microscopy were used to examine the blends produced. The size of the starch phase increased with an increasing content of starch for noncompatibilized and compatibilized blends. The POE/starch blends compatibilized with the POE‐g‐AA copolymer lowered the size of the starch phase and had a fine dispersion and homogeneity of starch in the POE matrix. This better dispersion was due to the formation of branched and crosslinked macromolecules because the POE‐g‐AA copolymer had anhydride groups to react with the hydroxyls. This was reflected in the mechanical properties of the blends, especially the tensile strength at break. In a comparison with pure POE, the decrease in the tensile strength was slight for compatibilized blends containing up to 40 wt % starch. The POE‐g‐AA copolymer was an effective compatibilizer because only a small amount was required to improve the mechanical properties of POE/starch blends. © 2002 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 86: 1792–1798, 2002     

Poly(ethylene‐graft‐ethylene oxide) (PE‐PEO) and poly(ethylene‐co‐acrylic acid) (PEAA) as compatibilizers in blends of LDPE and polyamide‐6

In a blend of two immiscible polymers a controlled morphology can be obtained by adding a block or graft copolymer as compatibilizer. In the present work blends of low‐density polyethylene (PE) and polyamide‐6 (PA‐6) were prepared by melt mixing the polymers in a co‐rotating, intermeshing twin‐screw extruder. Poly(ethylene‐graft‐polyethylene oxide) (PE‐PEO), synthesized from poly(ethylene‐co‐acrylic acid) (PEAA) (backbone) and poly(ethylene oxide) monomethyl ether (MPEO) (grafts), was added as compatibilizer. As a comparison, the unmodified backbone polymer, PEAA, was used. The morphology of the blends was studied by scanning electron microscopy (SEM). Melting and crystallization behavior of the blends was investigated by differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) and mechanical properties by tensile testing. The compatibilizing mechanisms were different for the two copolymers, and generated two different blend morphologies. Addition of PE‐PEO gave a material with small, well‐dispersed PA‐spheres having good adhesion to the PE matrix, whereas PEAA generated a morphology characterized by small PA‐spheres agglomerated to larger structures. Both compatibilized PE/PA blends had much improved mechanical properties compared with the uncompatibilized blend, with elongation at break (ε_b) increasing up to 200%. Addition of compatibilizer to the PE/PA blends stabilized the morphology towards coalescence and significantly reduced the size of the dispersed phase domains, from an average diameter of 20 μm in the unmodified PE/PA blend to approximately 1 μm in the compatibilized blends. © 2000 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 78: 2416–2424, 2000     

Effect of a N,N′‐disubstituted phenylenediamine stabilizer and SB/EPDM compatibilizer on toughness and morphology of blends of pre‐aged polyethylene with high‐impact polystyrene

The effect of a N,N′‐disubstituted 1,4‐phenylenediamine stabilizer and styrene‐butadiene block copolymer (SB)/ethylene‐propylene elastomer (EPDM) compatibilizer on mechanical properties and phase structure of pre‐aged low‐density polyethylene (LDPE; a model of aged recyclate)/high‐impact polystyrene (HIPS) blends was studied. A strong cooperative effect between the stabilizer and compatibilizer on the impact strength and fineness of the phase structure of LDPE/HIPS blends was found. Analysis of chemical reactions assumed to proceed in the system during processing led to the conclusion that improvement in the impact strength and phase structure was accounted for by reactive formation of a LDPE‐SB graft copolymer in a process supported by the presence of the bifunctional amine‐based stabilizer. The mixture of the amine stabilizer with SB/EPDM is a very promising upgrading system for post‐consumer plastic waste containing pre‐oxidized LDPE. J. VINYL. ADDIT. TECHNOL. 12:58–65, 2006. © 2006 Society of Plastics Engineers.     

Morphological and rheological properties of (low‐density polyethylene)/thermoplastic starch blend: investigation of the role of high elastic network

Rheological and morphological properties of low‐density polyethylene (LDPE) and thermoplastic starch (TPS) with low‐density polyethylene‐grafted‐maleic anhydride as a compatibilizer were investigated. The results showed that the circularity of the droplets decreased with increasing TPS content. The presence of compatibilizer led to finer morphology and higher continuity. The rheological analyses showed that TPS and compatibilizer can increase elasticity and viscosity of the blend dramatically. In addition, the compatibilizer enhanced the compatibility of the blends, as evidenced by the shifting of the relaxation time peak of TPS to longer times. The rheological properties of the neat components and their blends were discussed by the Carreau‐Yasuda and fractional Zener models. The fractional Zener model results proved the existence of network structure in the compatibilized blends. The transient properties of blends showed that TPS and compatibilized blends had strong overshoot compared with the uncompatibilized blend, owing to the formation of high elastic network in their structure. J. VINYL ADDIT. TECHNOL., 20:250–259, 2014. © 2014 Society of Plastics Engineers     

Compatibilization of polypropylene/nylon 6 blends with a polypropylene solid‐phase graft

The compatibilization of polypropylene (PP)/nylon 6 (PA6) blends with a new PP solid‐phase graft copolymer (gPP) was systematically studied. gPP improved the compatibility of PP/PA6 blends efficiently. Because of the reaction between the reactive groups of gPP and the NH₂ end groups of PA6, a PP‐g‐PA6 copolymer was formed as a compatibilizer in the vicinity of the interfaces during the melting extrusion of gPP and PA6. The tensile strength and impact strength of the compatibilized PP/PA6 blends obviously increased in comparison with those of the PP/PA6 mechanical blends, and the amount of gPP and the content of the third monomer during the preparation of gPP affected the mechanical properties of the compatibilized blends. Scanning electron microscopy and transmission electron microscopy indicated that the particle sizes of the dispersed phases of the compatibilized PP/PA6 blends became smaller and that the interfaces became more indistinct in comparison with the mechanical blends. The microcrystal size of PA6 and the crystallinity of the two components of the PP/PA6 blends decreased after compatibilization with gPP. The compatibilized PP/PA6 blends possessed higher pseudoplasticity, melt viscosity, and flow activation energy. © 2004 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 93: 420–427, 2004