Poly(ethylene‐graft‐ethylene oxide) (PE‐PEO) and poly(ethylene‐co‐acrylic acid) (PEAA) as compatibilizers in blends of LDPE and polyamide‐6

In a blend of two immiscible polymers a controlled morphology can be obtained by adding a block or graft copolymer as compatibilizer. In the present work blends of low‐density polyethylene (PE) and polyamide‐6 (PA‐6) were prepared by melt mixing the polymers in a co‐rotating, intermeshing twin‐screw extruder. Poly(ethylene‐graft‐polyethylene oxide) (PE‐PEO), synthesized from poly(ethylene‐co‐acrylic acid) (PEAA) (backbone) and poly(ethylene oxide) monomethyl ether (MPEO) (grafts), was added as compatibilizer. As a comparison, the unmodified backbone polymer, PEAA, was used. The morphology of the blends was studied by scanning electron microscopy (SEM). Melting and crystallization behavior of the blends was investigated by differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) and mechanical properties by tensile testing. The compatibilizing mechanisms were different for the two copolymers, and generated two different blend morphologies. Addition of PE‐PEO gave a material with small, well‐dispersed PA‐spheres having good adhesion to the PE matrix, whereas PEAA generated a morphology characterized by small PA‐spheres agglomerated to larger structures. Both compatibilized PE/PA blends had much improved mechanical properties compared with the uncompatibilized blend, with elongation at break (ε_b) increasing up to 200%. Addition of compatibilizer to the PE/PA blends stabilized the morphology towards coalescence and significantly reduced the size of the dispersed phase domains, from an average diameter of 20 μm in the unmodified PE/PA blend to approximately 1 μm in the compatibilized blends. © 2000 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 78: 2416–2424, 2000     

Property enhancement in polypropylene ternary blend nanocomposites via a novel poly(ethylene oxide)‐grafted polystyrene‐block‐poly(ethylene/butylene)‐block‐polystyrene toughener–compatibilizer system

Synthesis and characterization of a novel toughener–compatibilizer for polypropylene (PP)–montmorillonite (MMT) nanocomposites were conducted to provide enhanced mechanical and thermal properties. Poly(ethylene oxide) (PEO) blocks were synthetically grafted onto maleic anhydride‐grafted polystyrene‐block‐poly(ethylene/butylene)‐block‐polystyrene (SEBS‐g‐MA). Special attention was paid to emphasize the effect of PEO‐grafted SEBS (SEBS‐g‐PEO) against SEBS‐g‐MA on morphology, static/dynamic mechanical properties and surface hydrophilicity of the resultant blends and nanocomposites. It was found that the silicate layers of neat MMT are well separated by PEO chains chemically bonded to nonpolar SEBS polymer without needing any organophilic modification of the clay as confirmed by X‐ray diffraction and transmission electron microscopy analyses. From scanning electron microscopy analyses, elastomeric domains interacting with MMT layers via PEO sites were found to be distributed in the PP matrix with higher number and smaller sizes than the corresponding blend. As a benefit of PEO grafting, SEBS‐g‐PEO‐containing nanocomposite exhibited not only higher toughness/impact strength but also increased creep recovery, as compared to corresponding SEBS‐g‐MA‐containing nanocomposite and neat PP. The damping parameter of the same nanocomposite was also found to be high in a broad range of temperatures as another advantage of the SEBS‐g‐PEO toughener–compatibilizer. The water contact angles of the blends and nanocomposites were found to be lower than that of neat hydrophobic PP which is desirable for finishing processes such as dyeing and coating. © 2018 Society of Chemical Industry     

Simultaneously enhanced cryogenic mechanical behaviors of cyanate ester/epoxy resins by poly(ethylene oxide)‐co‐poly(propylene oxide)‐co‐poly(ethylene oxide) (PEO‐PPO‐PEO) block copolymer and clay

Cryogenic mechanical properties are important parameters for thermosetting resins used in cryogenic engineering areas. The hybrid nanocomposites were prepared by modification of a cyanate ester/epoxy/poly(ethylene oxide)‐block‐poly(propylene oxide)‐block‐poly(ethylene oxide) (PEO‐PPO‐PEO) system with clay. It is demonstrated that the cryogenic tensile strength, Young's modulus, ductility (failure strain), and fracture resistance (impact strength) are simultaneously enhanced by the addition of PEO‐PPO‐PEO and clay. The results show that the tensile strength and Young's modulus at 77 K of the hybrid nanocomposite containing 5 wt% PEO‐PPO‐PEO and 3 wt% clay were enhanced by 31.0% and 14.6%, respectively. The ductility and impact resistance at both room temperature and 77K are all improved for the hybrid composites. The fracture surfaces of the neat BCE/EP and its nanocomposites were examined using scanning electron microscopy (SEM). Finally, the dependence of the coefficients of thermal expansion (CTE) on the clay and PEO‐PPO‐PEO contents was examined by thermal dilatometer. POLYM. COMPOS., 38:2237–2247, 2017. © 2015 Society of Plastics Engineers     

MesoDyn modeling study of the phase morphologies of miktoarm poly(ethylene oxide)‐b‐poly(methyl methacrylate) copolymers doped with nanoparticles

Earlier studies have shown that poly(ethylene oxide) (PEO) and poly(methyl methacrylate) (PMMA) blocks are compatible at 270 and 298 K, and that their Flory–Huggins interaction parameters have the same blending ratio dependence at both temperatures. At a much higher temperature (400 K), the behavior of PEO/PMMA blends is strikingly different as both components become incompatible, while the Flory–Huggins parameters are low. Here we investigate the effect of doping with nanoparticles on the degree of incompatibility of twelve miktoarm PEO‐b‐PMMA copolymers at 400 K. Since PEO tends to be semicrystalline and long chains aggregate easily, PEO‐rich and long‐chain copolymer blends feature the highest degree of incompatibility for all nanoparticle arrangements and present cubic phase morphologies. In addition, the largest nanoparticles can reinforce the microscopic phase separation of all PEO‐b‐PMMA copolymers. This shows that the main factor affecting the phase morphology is the size of the nanoparticles. Also, only the asymmetric Da3‐type PEO‐rich copolymers show a hexagonal cylindrical phase morphology, which illustrates the effect induced by the nanoparticles on the microscopic phase separation changes of the PEO‐b‐PMMA copolymers. These induced effects are also related to the composition and molecular architecture of the copolymers. © 2013 Society of Chemical Industry     

Crystallization behavior of PEO in blends of poly(ethylene oxide)/poly(2‐vinyl pyridine)‐b‐(ethylene oxide) block copolymer

The crystallization behavior of two molecular weight poly(ethylene oxide)s (PEO) and their blends with the block copolymer poly(2‐vinyl pyridine)‐b‐poly(ethylene oxide) (P2VP‐b‐PEO) was investigated by polarized optical microscopy, thermogravimetric analysis, differential scanning calorimetry, and atomic force microscopy (AFM). A sharp decreasing of the spherulite growth rate was observed with the increasing of the copolymer content in the blend. The addition of P2VP‐b‐PEO to PEO increases the degradation temperature becoming the thermal stability of the blend very similar to that of the block copolymer P2VP‐b‐PEO. Glass transition temperatures, T_g, for PEO/P2VP‐b‐PEO blends were intermediate between those of the pure components and the value increased as the content of PEO homopolymer decreased in the blend. AFM images showed spherulites with lamellar crystal morphology for the homopolymer PEO. Lamellar crystal morphology with sheaf‐like lamellar arrangement was observed for 80 wt% PEO(200M) and a lamellar crystal morphology with grain aggregation was observed for 50 and 20 wt% blends. The isothermal crystallization kinetics of PEO was progressively retarded as the copolymer content in the blend increased, since the copolymer hinders the molecular mobility in the miscible amorphous phase. POLYM. ENG. SCI., 2012. © 2011 Society of Plastics Engineers     

Miscibility and mechanical properties of an amine‐cured epoxy resin blended with poly(ethylene oxide)

Blends composed of diaminodiphenylmethane bisphenol‐A epoxy resin and poly(ethylene oxide) (PEO) were prepared via in situ curing reaction of epoxy in the presence of PEO. The miscibility of the blends before and after curing was established by thermal (differential scanning calorimetry, DSC), microstructural (atomic force microscopy) and dynamic mechanical analysis. Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy indicated that the OH groups developed through cure reactions interact by hydrogen bonding with PEO. After crystallinity analysis by DSC, the interaction parameter was determined through the depression of the equilibrium melting temperature. Mechanical properties of the miscible blends do not show any significant change, although improvement of fracture toughness has been observed with respect to the matrix properties. Copyright © 2006 Society of Chemical Industry     

Properties of crosslinked blends of pellethene and multiblock polyurethane containing poly(ethylene oxide) for biomaterials

A series of multiblock polyurethanes, containing various poly(ethylene oxide) (PEO; number‐average molecular weight = 400–3400) contents (0–80 wt %) and prepared from hexamethylene diisocyanate/PEO/poly(dimethylsiloxane) diol/polybutadiene diol/1,4‐butanediol, were used as modifying additives (30 wt %) to improve the properties of biomedical‐grade Pellethene. Different molecular weights of PEO were used to keep poly(ethylene glycol) at a fixed molar content, if possible, although the PEO content, related to the PEO block length in the multiblock polyurethanes, was varied from 0 to 80 wt %. The hydrophilic PEO component was introduced through the addition of PEO‐containing polyurethanes and dicumyl peroxide as a crosslinking agent in a Pellethene matrix. As the PEO content (PEO block length) increased, the hydrogen‐bonding fraction of the crosslinked Pellethene/multiblock polyurethane blends increased, and this indicated an increase in the phase separation with an increase in the PEO content in the crosslinked Pellethene/multiblock polyurethane blends. According to electron spectroscopy for chemical analysis, the ratio of ether carbon to alkyl carbon in the crosslinked Pellethene/multiblock polyurethane blends increased remarkably with increasing PEO content. The water contact angle of the crosslinked Pellethene/multiblock polyurethane blend film surfaces decreased with increasing PEO content. The water absorption and mechanical properties (tensile modulus, strength, and elongation at break) of the crosslinked Pellethene/multiblock polyurethane blend films increased with increasing PEO content. The platelet adhesion on the crosslinked Pellethene/multiblock polyurethane blend film surfaces decreased significantly with increasing PEO content. These results suggest that crosslinked Pellethene/multiblock polyurethane blends containing the hydrophilic component PEO may have potential for biomaterials that come into direct contact with blood. © 2003 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 91: 2348–2357, 2004     

Morphology and barrier mechanism of biaxially oriented poly(ethylene terephthalate)/poly(ethylene 2,6‐naphthalate) blends

To improve the barrier properties of poly(ethylene terephthalate) (PET), PET/poly(ethylene 2,6‐naphthalate) (PEN) blends with different concentrations of PEN were prepared and were then processed into biaxially oriented PET/PEN films. The air permeability of bioriented films of pure PET, pure PEN, and PET/PEN blends were tested by the differential pressure method. The morphology of the blends was studied by scanning electron microscopy (SEM) observation of the impact fracture surfaces of extruded PET/PEN samples, and the morphology of the films was also investigated by SEM. The results of the study indicated that PEN could effectively improve the barrier properties of PET, and the barrier properties of the PET/PEN blends improved with increasing PEN concentration. When the PEN concentration was equal to or less than 30%, as in this study, the PET/PEN blends were phase‐separated; that is, PET formed the continuous phase, whereas PEN formed a dispersed phase of particles, and the interface was firmly integrated because of transesterification. After the PET/PEN blends were bioriented, the PET matrix contained a PEN microstructure consisting of parallel and extended, separate layers. This multilayer microstructure was characterized by microcontinuity, which resulted in improved barrier properties because air permeation was delayed as the air had to detour around the PEN layer structure. At a constant PEN concentration, the more extended the PEN layers were, the better the barrier properties were of the PET/PEN blends. © 2006 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 101: 1309–1316, 2006     

Characterization and properties of poly(ethylene oxide) and its blends with poly (N-vinyl carbazole)

The calorimetric properties and dynamic mechanical behaviour of pure poly(ethylene oxide) (PEO) and its blends with poly(N-vinyl carbazole) (PNVK) have been examined as a function of composition in the range 50-100% PEO. Thermomechanical measurements indicate the presence of a phase separation in this blend. Using the Hoffman-Weeks plot no equilibrium melting point depression was found in any of the blends studied. Some kinetic interfacial effects were detected in the crystallization processes. For all blend compositions, the Avrami exponent is close to that obtained for pure PEO. The DMTA and DTA results suggest an incompatibility in this system.     

Study on the properties of crosslinking of poly(ethylene oxide) and hydroxyapatite–poly(ethylene oxide) composite

This study covers the crosslinking of poly(ethylene oxide) (PEO) and its composite with calcium hydroxyapatite (HA), their mechanical and swelling properties, and morphology. Sheets of the composites of PEO (two different grades with M_v: 5 × 10⁶ and 2 × 10⁵) and HA and neat PEO were prepared by compression molding. The prepared composite and PEO (0.1‐mm‐thick) sheets were crosslinked with exposure of UV‐irradiation in the presence of a photoinitiator, acetophenone (AP). This simple method for crosslinking, induced by UV‐irradiation in the presence of AP, yielded PEO with gel content up to 90%. Gel content, equilibrium swelling ratio, and mechanical and morphological properties of the low molecular weight polyethylene oxide (LMPEO)–HA crosslinked and uncrosslinked composites were evaluated. Although the inclusion of HA into LMPEO inhibits the extent of crosslinking, the LMPEO–HA composite with 20% HA by weight shows the highest gel content, with appreciable equilibrium swelling and mechanical strength. The growth of HA in simulated body fluid solutions on fractured surfaces of LMPEO and also LMPEO–HA was found to be very favorable within short times. The dimensional stability of these samples was found to be satisfactory after swelling and deposition experiments. The good compatibility between the filler hydroxyapatite and poly(ethylene oxide) makes this composite a useful tissue‐adhesive material. © 2003 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 90: 488–496, 2003     

Crystallization behavior and mechanical properties of poly(ethylene oxide)/poly(L‐lactide)/poly(vinyl acetate) blends

Poly(vinyl acetate) (PVAc) was added to the crystalline blends of poly(ethylene oxide) (PEO) and poly(L ‐lactide) (PLLA) (40/60) of higher molecular weights, whereas diblock and triblock poly(ethylene glycol)–poly(L ‐lactide) copolymers were added to the same blend of moderate molecular weights. The crystallization rate of PLLA of the blend containing PVAc was reduced, as evidenced by X‐ray diffraction measurement. A ringed spherulite morphology of PLLA was observed in the PEO/PLLA/PVAc blend, attributed to the presence of twisted lamellae, and the morphology was affected by the amount of PVAc. A steady increase in the elongation at break in the solution blend with an increase in the PVAc content was observed. The melting behavior of PLLA and PEO in the PEO/PLLA/block copolymer blends was not greatly affected by the block copolymer, and the average size of the dispersed PEO domain was not significantly changed by the block copolymer. © 2001 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 82: 3618–3626, 2001     

Free volume defects and transport properties of mechanically stable polyhedral oligomeric silsesquioxane embedded poly(vinyl alcohol)‐poly(ethylene oxide) blend membranes

Polymer membrane based gas transport and pervaporation processes are fast growing areas in separation technology and have received wide attention as areas of ‘clean technology’. Mechanically stable novel polyhedral oligomeric silsesquioxane (POSS) embedded poly(vinyl alcohol) (PVA)/poly(ethylene oxide) (PEO) blend membranes were prepared by solution blending followed by casting. The addition of carboxymethyl cellulose enhanced the interfacial activities of the PVA and PEO blends. The peripheral organic substituent on POSS plays a key role in achieving compatibility with polymers whereas the rigid Si–O–Si core of POSS imparts high mechanical strength. Compared to PVA membrane, poly(ethylene glycol) and octa(tetramethylammonium) functionalized POSS embedded PVA/PEO membranes exhibit 680% and 580% enhancement in Young's modulus as well as 130% and 140% improvement in tensile strength respectively. The Einstein, Kerner and Frankel–Acrivos models were applied to compare the experimental and theoretical Young's modulus of PVA‐PEO/POSS membranes. The presence of an ethylene oxide tail on POSS as well as PEO in the blend membrane enhances the CO₂ affinity of the membrane. The presence of a hydrophilic functional group on the POSS improves the hydrophilicity of the membrane and produces more binding sites for water molecules in the membrane during the pervaporation separation of a tetrahydrofuran–water azeotropic mixture. The transport properties of the membrane are further elucidated by means of free volume defect analysis carried out by positron annihilation lifetime spectroscopy and coincidence Doppler broadening spectroscopy. © 2019 Society of Chemical Industry     

Hydrogels based on poly(ethylene oxide) and poly(tetramethylene oxide) or poly(dimethyl siloxane). II. Physical properties and bacterial adhesion

To investigate the effects of polymer chemistry and topology on physical properties and bacterial adhesion, various hydrogels composed of short hydrophilic [poly(ethylene oxide) (PEO)] and hydrophobic blocks were synthesized by polycondensation reactions. Differential scanning calorimetry and X‐ray diffraction analysis confirmed that all of the hydrogels were strongly phase‐separated due to incompatibility between PEO and hydrophobic blocks such as poly(tetramethylene oxide) (PTMO) and poly(dimethyl siloxane) (PDMS). The crystallization of PEO in the hydrogels was enhanced by the incorporation of longer PEO chains, the adoption of PDMS as a hydrophobic block, and the grafting of monomethoxy poly(ethylene oxide) (MPEO). Compared to Pellethane, the control polymer, the hydrogels exhibited higher Young's moduli and elongations at break, which was attributed to the crystalline domains of PEO and the flexible characteristics of the hydrophobic blocks. The mechanical properties of the hydrogels, however, significantly deteriorated when they were hydrated in distilled water; this was primarily ascribed to the disappearance of PEO crystallity. The water capacity of hydrogels at 37°C in phosphate‐buffered saline (PBS) (pH = 7.4) was dominantly dependant on PEO content, which also influenced the thermonegative swelling behavior. From the bacterial adhesion tests, it was evident that both S. epidermidis and E. coli adhered to Pellethane much greater than to the hydrogels, regardless of the preadsorption of albumin. Better resistance to bacterial adhesion was observed in hydrogels with longer PEO chains, with PTMO as a hydrophobic block, and with MPEO grafts. The least bacterial adhesion for both species was achieved on MPEO_2k–PTMO, a hydrogel with MPEO grafts. © 2003 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 89: 1505–1514, 2003     

Study of the miscibility and crystallization behavior of poly(ethylene oxide)/poly(vinyl alcohol) blends

The miscibility and crystallization behavior of poly(ethylene oxide)/poly(vinyl alcohol) (PEO/PVA) blends were investigated by differential scanning calorimetry (DSC), dynamic mechanical analysis (DMA), and polarizing optical microscopy. Because the glass‐transition temperature of PVA was near the melting point of PEO crystalline, an uncommon DSC procedure was used to determine the glass‐transition temperature of the PVA‐rich phase. From the DSC and DMA results, two glass‐transition temperatures, which corresponded to the PEO‐rich phase and the PVA‐rich phase, were observed. It was an important criterion to indicate that a blend was immiscible. It was also found that the preparation method of samples influenced the morphology and crystallization behaviors of PEO/PVA blends. The domain size of the disperse phase (PVA‐rich) for the solution‐cast blends was much larger than that for the coprecipitated blends. The crystallinity, spherulitic morphology, and isothermal crystallization behavior of PEO in the solution‐cast blends were similar to those of the neat PEO. On the contrary, these properties in the coprecipitated blends were different from those of the neat PEO. © 2004 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 92: 1562–1568, 2004     

Polyethers for biomedical applications: Bulk and surface characterisation of crosslinked blends of poly(ethylene oxide) and poly(propylene oxide)

Bulk and surface properties of crosslinked and non-crosslinked blends of poly(ethylene oxide) (PEO) and poly(propylene oxide) (PPOX) were studied for the elucidation of the behaviour of these materials in contact with blood. In the crosslinked blends the hydrophilic character increased with increasing PEO content, as concluded from swelling experiments and contact angle determinations. D.s.c. and dynamic mechanical measurements indicated the occurrence of phase separation in the blends and d.s.c. showed that on equilibration with water the PEO phase loses its crystallinity. F.t.-i.r.-a.t.r. analysis of the surface of crosslinked PPOX-PEO films showed an enrichment of the surface with PEO. These observations indicate that the good blood-compatibility of PPOX-PEO blends might be explained by the presence of an amorphous, PEO-enriched, hydrophilic surface.     

Crystallization and melting behavior of blends comprising poly(3‐hydroxy butyrate‐co‐3‐hydroxy valerate) and poly(ethylene oxide)

Blends of poly(3‐hydroxy butyrate‐co‐3‐hydroxy valerate) (PHBV) and poly(ethylene oxide) (PEO) were prepared by casting from chloroform solutions. Crystallization kinetics and melting behavior of blends have been studied by differential scanning calorimetry and optical polarizing microscopy. Experimental results reveal that the constituents are miscible in the amorphous state. They form separated crystal structures in the solid state. Crystallization behavior of the blends was studied under isothermal and nonisothermal conditions. Owing to the large difference in melting temperatures, the constituents crystallize consecutively in blends; however, the process is affected by the respective second component. PHBV crystallizes from the amorphous mixture of the constituents, at temperatures where the PEO remains in the molten state. PEO, on the other hand, is surrounded during its crystallization process by crystalline PHBV regions. The degree of crystallinity in the blends stays constant for PHBV and decreases slightly for PEO, with ascending PHBV content. The rate of crystallization of PHBV decreases in blends as compared to the neat polymer. The opposite behavior is observed for PEO. Nonisothermal crystallization is discussed in terms of a quasi‐isothermal approach. Qualitatively, the results show the same tendencies as under isothermal conditions. © 2006 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 101: 2776–2783, 2006     

Toughening of polypropylene with crystallizable poly(ethylene oxide)

A crystallizable polymer, poly(ethylene oxide) (PEO), was used as new modifier to tailor the toughness of isotactic polypropylene (iPP). An optimum performance was achieved at a medium PEO content of 15 wt% where the toughness was enhanced by 300%, while the strength only decreased slightly. To elucidate the origin of toughening in the iPP/PEO blends, various crystallographic and morphological experiments including X‐ray diffraction, electron microscopy and calorimetry were adopted to explore the dependences of polymorphic composition and crystallized morphology on PEO content. When the PEO content is less than 15 wt%, the dispersed PEO cannot crystallize, and these non‐crystalline PEO microspheres are embedded in both α‐ and β‐form iPP spherulites, which is mainly responsible for the toughening. In contrast, when the PEO content is higher than 15 wt%, the PEO phase becomes crystallizable, and significant phase segregation takes place, resulting in a marked deterioration in mechanical properties. Copyright © 2011 Society of Chemical Industry     

Compatibilization of a poly(butylene terephthalate)/poly(ethylene octene) copolymer blends with different amounts of an epoxy resin

New toughened poly(butylene terephthalate) (PBT) materials were obtained by melt blending with 20 wt % poly(ethylene octene) (PEO) copolymer and different levels of a difunctional epoxy resin in a twin‐screw extruder followed by injection‐molding. The presence of neither PEO or epoxy influenced either the phase nature of the two amorphous phases of the blends or the crystallization process of PBT, despite the slight reaction of epoxy with PBT as stated by the observed torque increases. The addition of epoxy led to a decrease in the particle size that stopped due to the concomitant viscosity increase. Supertough PBT‐based blends with an impact strength more than 18‐fold that of PBT were obtained without previous chemical modification of any of the blend components at 1.0 wt % epoxy contents. The interparticle distance was the parameter that controlled notched toughness in these PBT/PEO blends. The adhesion at the interphase was the parameter on which the critical interparticle distance appeared to depend. © 2003 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 91: 260–269, 2004     

Poly(ethylene oxide)–polyelectrolyte blends: viscometric and thermal analysis behaviour

The miscibility of binary poly(ethylene oxide) (PEO) and sodium poly(4‐styrene sulphonate) (PSS) or [3,6]‐ionene (ION) systems, was analysed in aqueous solutions and in the solid state by viscometry and thermal analysis, respectively. Both techniques indicate partial miscibility of PEO–PSS and immiscibility of PEO–ION blends. In water solution, the partial miscibility of the PEO–PSS system is probably due to the counterion Na⁺ which can partially provide the driving force association in a similar manner to that observed for PEO–surfactant systems. In blend films, the PEO–polyelectrolyte interaction is also analysed in terms of the effect on the PEO crystallization observed through optical microscopy, and the results indicate compatibility between the components in the PEO–PSS system. © 2000 Society of Chemical Industry     

Preparation and characterization of poly(lactic acid)/poly(ethylene oxide) blend film: effects of poly(ethylene oxide) and poly(ethylene glycol) on the properties

Poly(lactic acid) (PLA) film plasticized with poly(ethylene oxide) (PEO) at various weight percentages (1–5 wt%) was prepared to improve the elongation, thus overcoming the inherent brittleness of the material. After optimization of the amount of PEO (4 wt%) through mechanical analysis, poly(ethylene glycol) (PEG), a well‐established plasticizer of PLA, was added (0.5–1.5 wt%) without hampering the transparency and tensile strength much, and again its amount was optimized (1 wt%). Neat PLA and PLA with the other components were solvent‐cast in the form of films using chloroform as a solvent. Improvement in elongation at break and reduction in tensile strength suggested a plasticizing effect of both PEO and PEG on PLA. Thermal and infrared data revealed that the addition of PEO induced β crystals in PLA. Scanning electron micrographs indicated a porous surface morphology of the blends. PEO alone in PLA exhibited the best optical clarity with higher percentage crystallinity, while PEG incorporation in PLA/PEO resulted in superior barrier properties. Also, the stability of the blends under a wide range of pH means prospective implementation of the films in packaging of food and non‐food‐grade products. © 2018 Society of Chemical Industry