An optimal speed-up parallel algorithm for triangulating simplicial point sets in space

Previous research on developing parallel triangulation algorithms concentrated on triangulating planar point sets.O(log³ n) running time algorithms usingO(n) processors have been developed in Refs. 1 and 2. Atallah and Goodrich⁽³⁾ presented a data structure that can be viewed as a parallel analogue of the sequential plane-sweeping paradigm, which can be used to triangulate a planar point set inO(logn loglogn) time usingO(n) processors. Recently Merks⁽⁴⁾ described an algorithm for triangulating point sets which runs inO(logn) time usingO(n) processors, and is thus optimal. In this paper we develop a parallel algorithm for triangulating simplicial point sets in arbitrary dimensions based on the idea of the sequential algorithm presented in Ref. 5. The algorithm runs inO(log² n) time usingO(n/logn) processors. The algorithm hasO(n logn) as the product of the running time and the number of processors; i.e., an optimal speed-up.     

On Parallel Selection and Searching in Partial Orders: Sorted Matrices

Parallel algorithms for the problems of selection and searching on sorted matrices are formulated. The selection algorithm takesO(lognlog lognlog*n) time withO(n/lognlog*n) processors on an EREW PRAM. This algorithm can be generalized to solve the selection problem on a set of sorted matrices. The searching algorithm takesO(log logn) time withO(n/log logn) processors on a Common CRCW PRAM, which is optimal. We show that no algorithm using at mostnlog^cnprocessors,c≥ 1, can solve the matrix search problem in time faster than Ω(log logn) and that Ω(logn) steps are needed to solve this problem on any model that does not allow concurrent writes.     

Efficient parallel and sequential algorithms for 4-coloring perfect planar graphs

We present an efficient algorithm for 4-coloring perfect planar graphs. The best previously known algorithm for this problem takesO(n ^3/2) sequential time, orO(log⁴ n) parallel time withO(n³) processors. The sequential implementation of our algorithm takesO(n logn) time. The parallel implementation of our algorithm takesO(log³ n) time withO(n) processors on a PRAM.     

Parallel algorithms for arrangements

We give the first efficient parallel algorithms for solving the arrangement problem. We give a deterministic algorithm for the CREW PRAM which runs in nearly optimal bounds ofO (logn log^* n) time andn ²/logn processors. We generalize this to obtain anO (logn log^* n)-time algorithm usingn ^d /logn processors for solving the problem ind dimensions. We also give a randomized algorithm for the EREW PRAM that constructs an arrangement ofn lines on-line, in which each insertion is done in optimalO (logn) time usingn/logn processors. Our algorithms develop new parallel data structures and new methods for traversing an arrangement.This work was supported by the National Science Foundation, under Grants CCR-8657562 and CCR-8858799, NSF/DARPA under Grant CCR-8907960, and Digital Equipment Corporation. A preliminary version of this paper appeared at the Second Annual ACM Symposium on Parallel Algorithms and Architectures [3].     

An optimal parallel algorithm for planar cycle separators

We present an optimal parallel algorithm for computing a cycle separator of ann-vertex embedded planar undirected graph inO(logn) time onn/logn processors. As a consequence, we also obtain an improved parallel algorithm for constructing a depth-first search tree rooted at any given vertex in a connected planar undirected graph in O(log² n) time on n/logn processors. The best previous algorithms for computing depth-first search trees and cycle separators achieved the same time complexities, but withn processors. Our algorithms run on a parallel random access machine that permits concurrent reads and concurrent writes in its shared memory and allows an arbitrary processor to succeed in case of a write conflict.A preliminary version of this paper appeared as Improved Parallel Depth-First Search in Undirected Planar Graphs in theProceedings of the Third Workshop on Algorithms and Data Structures, 1993, pp. 407–420.Supported in part by NSF Grant CCR-9101385.     

PRAM和LARPBS模型上有向序列翻转距离并行算法

分别在两种重要并行计算模型中给出计算有向基因组排列的反转距离新的并行算法.基于Hannenhalli和Pevzner理论,分3个主要部分设计并行算法:构建断点图、计算断点图中圈数、计算断点图中障碍的数目.在CREW-PRAM模型上,算法使用O(n²)处理器,时间复杂度为O(log²n);在基于流水光总线的可重构线性阵列系统(linear array with a reconfigurable pipelined bus system, LARPBS)模型上,算法使用O(n³)处理器,计算时间复杂度为O(logn).     

Efficient parallel term matching and anti-unification

In this paper we present optimal processor x time parallel algorithms for term matching and anti-unification of terms represented as trees. Term matching is the special case of unification in which one of the terms is restricted to contain no variables. It has wide applicability to logic programming, term rewriting systems and symbolic pattern matching. Anti-unification is the dual problem of unification in which one computes the most specific generalization of two terms. It has application to inductive inference and theorem proving. Our algorithms run in O(log² N) time using N/log² N processors on a shared-memory model of computation that prohibits simultaneous reads or writes (EREW PRAM). These algorithms are the first polylogarithmic-time EREW algorithms with a processor x time product of the same order as that of their sequential counterparts, thereby permitting optimal speed-ups using any number of processors up to N/log² N. We also use the techniques developed in the paper to provide an N/log N-processor, O(log N)-time algorithm for a shared-memory model that allows both simultaneous reads and simultaneous writes (CRCW PRAM).Supported by NSF Grant IRI-88-09324 and NSF/DARPA Grant CCR-8908092.     

Parallel algorithms for line generation

A new, parallel approach for generating Bresenham-type lines is developed. Coordinate pairs which approximate straight lines on a square grid are derived from line equations. These pairs serve as a basis for the development of four new parallel algorithms. One of the algorithms uses the fact that straight time generation is equivalent to a vector prefix sums calculation. The algorithms execute on a binary tree of processors. Each node in the tree performs a simple calculation that involves only additions and shifts. All four algorithms have time complexityO(log₂ n) wheren in the form 2 ^m denotes the number of points generated andn-1 is the number of processors in the tree. This compares toO(n) for Bresenham's algorithm executed on a sequential processor. Pipelining can be used to achieve a constant time per line generation as long as line length is less thann.     

Efficient parallel algorithms forr-dominating set andp-center problems on trees

We develop efficient parallel algorithms for ther-dominating set and thep-center problems on trees. On a concurrent-read exclusive-write PRAM, our algorithm for ther-dominating set problem runs inO(logn log logn) time withn processors. The algorithm for thep-center problem runs inO(log² n log logn) time withn processors.Xin He was supported in part by an Ohio State University Presidential Fellowship, and by the Office of Research and Graduate Studies of Ohio State University. Yaacov Yesha was supported in part by the National Science Foundation under Grant No. DCR-8606366.     

Efficient parallel solutions to some geometric problems

This paper presents new algorithms for solving some geometric problems on a shared memory parallel computer, where concurrent reads are allowed but no two processors can simultaneously attempt to write in the same memory location. The algorithms are quite different from known sequential algorithms, and are based on the use of a new parallel divide-and-conquer technique. One of our results is an O(log n) time, O(n) processor algorithm for the convex hull problem. Another result is an O(log n log log n) time, O(n) processor algorithm for the problem of selecting a closest pair of points among n input points.     

Parallel algorithms for minimal spanning trees of directed graphs

The main results of this paper are efficient parallel algorithms, MSP and LOCATE, for computing minimal spanning trees and locating minimal paths in directed graphs, respectively. Algorithm MSP has time complexityO(log³ n) usingO(n ³/logn) processors, while LOCATE has time complexityO(logn) usingO(n ²) processors. Algorithm MSP is derived from sequential algorithms, when the unbounded parallelism model is used.     

Finding least-weight subsequences with fewer processors

By restricting weight functions to satisfy the quadrangle inequality or the inverse quadrangle inequality, significant progress has been made in developing efficient sequential algorithms for the least-weight subsequence problem [10], [9], [12], [16]. However, not much is known on the improvement of the naive parallel algorithm for the problem, which is fast but demands too many processors (i.e., it takesO(log² n) time on a CREW PRAM with n³/logn processors). In this paper we show that if the weight function satisfies the inverse quadrangle inequality, the problem can be solved on a CREW PRAM in O(log² n log logn) time withn/log logn processors, or in O(log² n) time withn logn processors. Notice that the processor-time complexity of our algorithm is much closer to the almost linear-time complexity of the best-known sequential algorithm [12].     

An efficient all-parses systolic algorithm for general context-free parsing

The problem of outputting all parse trees of a string accepted by a context-free grammar is considered. A systolic algorithms is presented that operates inO(m·n) time, wherem is the number of distinct parse trees andn is the length of the input. The systolic array usesn ² processors, each of which requires at mostO(logn) bits of storage. This is much more space-efficient that a previously reported systolic algorithm for the same problem, which requiredO(n logn) space per processor. The algorithm also extends previous algorithms that only output a single parse tree of the input.Research squpported in part by NSF Grant DCR-8420935 and DCR-8604603.     

Gossiping by processors prone to omission failures

We consider the gossip problem in a synchronous message-passing system. Participating processors are prone to omission failures, that is, a faulty processor may fail to send or receive a message. The gossip problem in the fault-tolerant setting is defined as follows: every correct processor must learn the initial value of any other processor, unless the other one is faulty; in the latter case either the initial value or the information about the fault must be learned. We develop two efficient algorithms that solve the gossip problem in time O(logn), where n is the number of processors in the system. The first one is an explicit algorithm (i.e., constructed in polynomial time) sending O(nlogn+f²) messages, and the second one reduces the message complexity to O(n+f²), where f is the upper bound on the number of faulty processors.     

Adaptive parallel algorithms for integral knapsack problems

In this paper, the design of a time-efficient and processor-efficient parallel algorithm for the integral knapsack problem is considered. A parallel integral knapsack algorithm is presented, which is adaptive to all parameters, especially to the maximum size of items. The parallel complexity of another important packing problem, the integral exactly-packing problem, is also considered. An optimal O(log n log m) time, parallel integral exactly-packing algorithm is given. Since the partition problem has a constant time, constant processor reduction to the exactly-packing problem, our parallel integral exactly-packing algorithm can be used for job scheduling, task partition, and many other important practical problems. Moreover, the methods and techniques used in this paper can be used for developing processor-efficient and time-efficient parallel algorithms for many other problems. Using the new parallel integral knapsack algorithm, the previously known parallel approximation schemes for the 0–1 knapsack problem and the binpacking problem, by E. W. Mayr and P. S. Gopalkrishnan, are improved upon significantly.     

Efficient parallel and sequential algorithms for 4-coloring perfect planar graphs

We present an efficient algorithm for 4-coloring perfect planar graphs. The best previously known algorithm for this problem takesO(n ^3/2) sequential time, orO(log⁴ n) parallel time withO(n³) processors. The sequential implementation of our algorithm takesO(n logn) time. The parallel implementation of our algorithm takesO(log³ n) time withO(n) processors on a PRAM.

     

背包类问题的并行O(25n/6)时间-空间-处理机折衷

将串行动态二表算法应用于并行三表算法的设计中,提出一种求解背包、精确的可满足性和集覆盖等背包类NP完全问题的并行三表六子表算法.基于EREW-PRAM模型,该算法可使用O(2^n/8)的处理机在O(2^7n/16)的时间和O(2^13n/48)的空间求解n维背包类问题,其时间-空间-处理机折衷为O(2^5n/6).与现有文献的性能对比分析表明,该算法极大地提高了并行求解背包类问题的时间-空间-处理机折衷性能.由于该算法能够破解更高维数的背包类公钥和数字水印系统,其结论在密钥分析领域具有一定的理论和实际意义.     

An NC algorithm for finding a minimum weighted completion time schedule on series parallel graphs

We present a parallel algorithm for solving the minimum weighted completion time scheduling problem for transitive series parallel graphs. The algorithm takesO(log² n) time withO(n ³) processors on a CREW PRAM, wheren is the number of vertices of the input graph. This is the first NC algorithm for solving the problem.Research supported in part by NSF Grants CCR-9011214 and CCR-9205982.     

Parallel Algorithms for the Edge-Coloring and Edge-Coloring Update Problems

LetG(V,E) be a simple undirected graph with a maximum vertex degree Δ(G) (or Δ for short), |V| =nand |E| =m. An edge-coloring ofGis an assignment to each edge inGa color such that all edges sharing a common vertex have different colors. The minimum number of colors needed is denoted by χ′(G) (called thechromatic index). For a simple graphG, it is known that Δ ≤ χ′(G) ≤ Δ + 1. This paper studies two edge-coloring problems. The first problem is to perform edge-coloring for an existing edge-colored graphGwith Δ + 1 colors stemming from the addition of a new vertex intoG. The proposed parallel algorithm for this problem runs inO(Δ^3/2log³Δ + Δ logn) time usingO(max{nΔ, Δ³}) processors. The second problem is to color the edges of a given uncolored graphGwith Δ + 1 colors. For this problem, our first parallel algorithm requiresO(Δ^5.5log³Δ logn+ Δ⁵log⁴n) time andO(max{n²Δ,nΔ³}) processors, which is a slight improvement on the algorithm by H. J. Karloff and D. B. Shmoys [J. Algorithms8 (1987), 39–52]. Their algorithm costsO(Δ⁶log⁴n) time andO(n²Δ) processors if we use the fastest known algorithm for finding maximal independent sets by M. Goldberg and T. Spencer [SIAM J. Discrete Math.2 (1989), 322–328]. Our second algorithm requiresO(Δ^4.5log³Δ logn+ Δ⁴log⁴n) time andO(max{n²,nΔ³}) processors. Finally, we present our third algorithm by incorporating the second algorithm as a subroutine. This algorithm requiresO(Δ^3.5log³Δ logn+ Δ³log⁴n) time andO(max{n²log Δ,nΔ³}) processors, which improves, by anO(Δ^2.5) factor in time, on Karloff and Shmoys' algorithm. All of these algorithms run in the COMMON CRCW PRAM model.     

An efficient parallel algorithm for shortest paths in planar layered digraphs

Computing shortest paths in a directed graph has received considerable attention in the sequential RAM model of computation. However, developing a polylog-time parallel algorithm that is close to the sequential optimal in terms of the total work done remains an elusive goal. We present a first step in this direction by giving efficient parallel algorithms for shortest paths in planar layered digraphs.We show that these graphs admit special kinds of separators calledone- way separators which allow the paths in the graph to cross it only once. We use these separators to give divide- and -conquer solutions to the problem of finding the shortest paths between any two vertices. We first give a simple algorithm that works in the CREW model and computes the shortest path between any two vertices in ann-node planar layered digraph in timeO(log² n) usingn/logn processors. We then use results of Aggarwal and Park [1] and Atallah [4] to improve the time bound toO(log² n) in the CREW model andO(logn log logn) in the CREW model. The processor bounds still remain asn/logn for the CREW model andn/log logn for the CRCW model.Support for the first and third authors was provided in part by a National Science Foundation Presidential Young Investigator Award CCR-9047466 with matching funds from IBM, by NSF Research Grant CCR-9007851, by Army Research Office Grant DAAL03-91-G-0035, and by the Office of Naval Research and the Advanced Research Projects Agency under Contract N00014-91-J-4052, ARPA, Order 8225. Support for the second author was provided in part by NSF Research Grant CCR-9007851, by Army Research Office Grant DAAL03-91-G-0035, and by the Office of Naval Research and the Advanced Research Projects Agency under Contract N00014-91-J-4052 and ARPA Order 8225.