浅谈室内装修项目的污染物危害及控制措施

文章从室内装修中污染物的危害着手，分析了室内装修污染的影响因素，包括板材用量对甲醛浓度的影响、环境温度对甲醛浓度影响、装修完毕的通风时间对甲醛浓度影响等，最后重点阐述室内装修污染的控制措施，可供借鉴。     

浅议居室装修中的甲醛污染与防治措施

甲醛是影响室内空气质量的主要污染物之一,室内空气中的甲醛很大程度上来源于家居装修中所使用的装饰材料。本文探讨了室内装修对室内甲醛污染的影响及特性,并提出了防治室内甲醛污染的具体措施与建议。     

浅谈利用甲醛检测仪检测装饰装修材料中的室内污染物

正室内有害污染物中甲醛的超标率极高,挥发周期又长,且对人体健康影响甚大,目前被国际癌症研究机构确定为可疑致癌物,长期吸入可引发鼻咽癌、喉头癌等严重疾病,加强对室内有害污染物甲醛的检测有着重要意义。本文利用参与的住建部项目《住宅装饰装修污染物调查与改善研究》(项目编号:2013-K6-10)项目组提供PPM htV-m记录型甲醛检测仪,进行了室内装饰装修后的室内有害污染物甲醛对比检测分析和连续监测分析,体现了甲醛检测仪在实际应用中的优缺点,对于     

装修住宅室内空气中甲醛和TVOC污染现状及分析

为了解目前装修对室内空气造成的污染状况,以淮安市居民家庭为例,随机采集调查了淮安市90个室内装修空气样本,结果显示,甲醛和TVOC检出率为100%,甲醛超标率较高。与往年国内各地检测数据对比,本文检测的甲醛和TVOC浓度并未呈现明显下降趋势,说明近几年装修对室内空气造成的污染状况未得到有效改善;与国外污染物检测浓度相比,国内检测数据偏高,说明国内装修材料在环保方面仍有待提高。     

某住宅室内装修污染物分析与控制

对当前室内装修所用到的装修材料进行了介绍,分析了室内装修材料带来的室内污染物和对人体的危害。以一套经过新装修的住宅为例,主要对卧室内的污染物种类与含量进行了测量,给出室内污染物浓度随着时间的变化情况,测量发现室内主要污染物甲醛的浓度受温度、相对湿度、天气状况等影响。针对室内污染物的散发特点与分布,合理的对装饰装修引起的室内空气污染进行控制。     

浅析室内装修空气中甲醛-氨的有效检测和控制

随着室内装修材料的逐渐普及,各种新型装修材料不断升级,室内空气中的甲醛-氨污染问题受到人们越来越多的重视,室内甲醛-氨的污染会严重影响到人们的身体健康,本文主要论述室内装修空气中甲醛、氨的有效检测和控制,希望能为相关人员带来一些帮助。     

盆栽植物净化装修室内甲醛效果测试

分析了各种装修室内污染物净化技术的优缺点,总结了国内外盆栽植物吸收室内甲醛的研究情况,并对新装修一个月未人住的实际住宅进行了植物吸收甲醛的测试,得出盆栽植物对室内污染物浓度较高的房间吸收甲醛的效果并不明显,当移出植物后室内污染物浓度又有所回升.     

室内装修材料中甲醛污染物的检测与防治策略

室内环境污染问题是城市化进程中居民关注的焦点问题,其中装修材料发挥的甲醛污染物很容易对人体健康造成威胁.人民生活水平的不断提升,使房屋装修的样式逐渐多样化,各种个性化的家具和装饰材料均含有危害人体健康的化学物质,在长期的释放过程中会增加室内空气污染的严重程度.本文简要分析室内装修中主要污染物甲醛的来源、特点,提出降低室内空气污染、防治甲醛的措施.     

解读建筑装饰装修设计控制室内空气有害物质的方法

室内空气污染是现代建筑室内装饰中比较严重的问题之一,根据医学领域的研究可知,劣质的室内装修设计和材料使用产生了甲醛、苯等诸多有害气体,这些有害气体会严重影响居住在室内的人们的身体健康,引发癌症等病症,所以,进行建筑装饰、装修的绿色设计十分重要。本文从建筑装饰装修可能导致的空气污染物入手,分析建筑装饰、装修设计中控制有害物质的具体方法,为提高建筑室内空气清洁水平提供一些思路。     

室内植物对空气净化能力的研究——2010年上海世博会“沪上·生态家”植物筛选

室内空气质量与人的生活息息相关,其中甲醛是装修后室内空气中主要污染物之一,因此迫切需要改善室内空气质量来获得良好的生活环境。室内植物可以吸收甲醛,从而净化空气,但目前没有准确的科学数据作支撑,且已有的研究植物的针对性不强。因此,通过建立科学的测试方法,研究目前市场上较为常用的室内观赏植物,从而得出相对准确的关于室内观赏植物的叶片部分在模拟甲醛超标环境中甲醛净化效果结论,显得非常必要。     

室内空气甲醛和氨与室外气象条件相关性研究

为了解寒冷地区哈尔滨市室内空气污染物随气候变化的特性,通过对哈尔滨市某一新建楼房办公室进行一年的室内空气甲醛和氨实验检测,确定了室内外环境温度与室内空气甲醛和氨浓度的关系。实验结果表明,气象状况（季节、风力、雨雪等）变化和哈尔滨生活环境特点使室内外温差改变较大,从而导致室内空气甲醛和氨浓度呈现规律性变化。本研究结果具有地区代表性,为完善室内空气污染物检测和评价体系提供依据。     

Organic air pollutants inside and outside residences in Shimizu, Japan: levels, sources and risks

Concentrations of 38 organic air pollutants including aromatic hydrocarbons (AHCs), carbonyl compounds (CCs), volatile organic halogenated compounds (VOHCs), and organophosphorus compounds (OPCs) were measured in indoor and outdoor air in an industrial city, Shimizu, Shizuoka Prefecture, Japan. Levels of pollutants tended to be higher indoors than outdoors in both summer and winter except for benzene, carbon tetrachloride, trichloroethylene, tetrachloroethylene, and dichlorvos (DDVP). This trend was especially pronounced for CCs such as formaldehyde and acetaldehyde. For the organic air pollutants, the concentrations of AHCs and VOHCs substantially increased in winter, but not those of CCs and OPCs; the trends were similar for both indoors and outdoors. We investigated possible indoor sources of pollutants statistically. Multiple regression analysis of corresponding indoor and outdoor concentrations and the responses to our questionnaire showed that indoor concentrations of certain AHCs were significantly affected by their outdoor concentrations and cigarette smoking. For formaldehyde, indoor concentrations were significantly affected by house age and the presence of carpet or pets. For p-dichlorobenzene (pDCB), the concentrations in bedroom trended to be higher than those in other indoors and outdoors, suggested that mothballs for clothes present in bedrooms are the principal indoor source of pDCB. We compared indoor and outdoor pollutant concentrations to acceptable risk limits for 11 organic air pollutants. In indoors without smoking samples, the geometric mean concentrations of benzene, formaldehyde, acetaldehyde, carbon tetrachloride, pDCB, and DDVP exceeded the equivalent concentration representing the upper bound of one-in-one-hundred-thousand (1x10(-5)) excess risk over a lifetime of exposure.     

Do indoor pollutants and thermal conditions in schools influence student performance? A critical review of the literature

To assess whether school environments can adversely affect academic performance, we review scientific evidence relating indoor pollutants and thermal conditions, in schools or other indoor environments, to human performance or attendance. We critically review evidence for direct associations between these aspects of indoor environmental quality (IEQ) and performance or attendance. Secondarily, we summarize, without critique, evidence on indirect connections potentially linking IEQ to performance or attendance. Regarding direct associations, little strongly designed research was available. Persuasive evidence links higher indoor concentrations of NO(2) to reduced school attendance, and suggestive evidence links low ventilation rates to reduced performance. Regarding indirect associations, many studies link indoor dampness and microbiologic pollutants (primarily in homes) to asthma exacerbations and respiratory infections, which in turn have been related to reduced performance and attendance. Also, much evidence links poor IEQ (e.g. low ventilation rate, excess moisture, or formaldehyde) with adverse health effects in children and adults and documents dampness problems and inadequate ventilation as common in schools. Overall, evidence suggests that poor IEQ in schools is common and adversely influences the performance and attendance of students, primarily through health effects from indoor pollutants. Evidence is available to justify (i) immediate actions to assess and improve IEQ in schools and (ii) focused research to guide IEQ improvements in schools. PRACTICAL IMPLICATIONS: There is more justification now for improving IEQ in schools to reduce health risks to students than to reduce performance or attendance risks. However, as IEQ-performance links are likely to operate largely through effects of IEQ on health, IEQ improvements that benefit the health of students are likely to have performance and attendance benefits as well. Immediate actions are warranted in schools to prevent dampness problems, inadequate ventilation, and excess indoor exposures to substances such as NO(2) and formaldehyde. Also, siting of new schools in areas with lower outdoor pollutant levels is preferable.     

新装修办公室内空气污染的消除试验

以一个新装修的办公室为研究对象,对室内的污染状况进行了检测。从控制污染源和消除室内空气污染两方面进行了净化试验。试验结果表明,在有紫外线灯照射时,用臭氧水对空间和人造板表面进行喷雾,同时保持室内高臭氧浓度的方法对降低人造板的甲醛散发量有明显效果;利用夜间产生高浓度臭氧、白天产生低浓度臭氧结合活性炭吸附的方法能有效消除室内空气中的甲醛和氨气。     

室内环境污染的检测与防治

阐述了室内环境污染的五种主要污染物甲醛、氨、氡、苯、TVOC的检测方法,提出对室内环境检测上的认识误区和防治室内环境污染的措施,从而有效降低室内环境污染,提高室内环境质量要求.     

室内主要特征污染物来源及治理措施分析

通过检测分析室内主要化学污染物,发现甲醛、苯系物、酯类以及烷烃类化合物仍是影响室内环境质量的主要因素。本文通过研究污染物的主要来源,提出源头控制是根本措施,同时兼具通风、摆放事宜绿植以及催化材料处理等措施,从而达到改善室内空气质量的目的。     

室内装修空气污染现状与防治措施

对室内装修中甲醛、苯、氨、TVOCs、氡五种常见的污染物进行了介绍,分别研究了各种污染物的来源及危害,提出了树立绿色装修理念、保持通风、控制新家具数量、绿色植物净化处理等防治措施,以期从源头上削减和控制室内空气污染。     

防治室内装修污染 追求绿色环保新居

针对甲醛、苯、氡等室内装修污染源及其危害进行了分析,从环保理念、装饰材料、室内空气检测三方面入手,探讨了防止和减少室内环境污染的有效措施,以期指导室内装修设计施工,保障人们身体健康。     

Indoor air quality in the university libraries of Modena (Italy)

We carried out a survey in 16 libraries of the University of Modena, Northern Italy, to assess the indoor exposure to volatile organic compounds (VOCs), including formaldehyde, and total dusts. Data were collected on the main structural characteristics of the buildings; indoor microclimate parameters, such as temperature, relative humidity and ventilation rate were measured and air samples taken inside and outside the libraries. The mean value of total dusts was 190 +/- 130 microg/m3 with a wide range of values. Formaldehyde was found in only ten out of 16 libraries and the indoor concentrations ranged from 1.70 to 67.8 microg/m3 with an average value of 32.7 +/- 23.9 microg/m3. On the whole, VOCs were present in all the libraries investigated with an average value was 433 +/- 267 microg/m3 (range 102-936 microg/m3). No correlation was found among VOCs, formaldehyde and total dusts nor was a significant association observed with microclimatic parameters or the structural characteristics of the buildings. The general situation found in this study suggests no major problems related to indoor pollution. However, some of the pollutants investigated such as total dust and total VOCs deserve further investigation. It is important to identify the possible sources of contaminants and to define the relationship between indoor and outdoor levels of pollutants more accurately, taking into account the effects of air recycling due to natural ventilation systems.