Discovery of α‐Substituted Imidazole‐4‐acetic Acid Analogues as a Novel Class of ρ1 γ‐Aminobutyric Acid Type A Receptor Antagonists with Effect on Retinal Vascular Tone

The ρ‐containing γ‐aminobutyric acid type A receptors (GABA_ARs) play an important role in controlling visual signaling. Therefore, ligands that selectively target these GABA_ARs are of interest. In this study, we demonstrate that the partial GABA_AR agonist imidazole‐4‐acetic acid (IAA) is able to penetrate the blood–brain barrier in vivo; we prepared a series of α‐ and N‐alkylated, as well as bicyclic analogues of IAA to explore the structure–activity relationship of this scaffold focusing on the acetic acid side chain of IAA. The compounds were prepared via IAA from l ‐histidine by an efficient minimal‐step synthesis, and their pharmacological properties were characterized at native rat GABA_ARs in a [³H]muscimol binding assay and at recombinant human α₁β₂γ_2S and ρ₁ GABA_ARs using the FLIPR? membrane potential assay. The (+)‐α‐methyl‐ and α‐cyclopropyl‐substituted IAA analogues ((+)‐ 6 a and 6 c , respectively) were identified as fairly potent antagonists of the ρ₁ GABA_AR that also displayed significant selectivity for this receptor over the α₁β₂γ_2S GABA_AR. Both 6 a and 6 c were shown to inhibit GABA‐induced relaxation of retinal arterioles from porcine eyes.     

Synthesis and in vivo Evaluation of Fluorine‐18 and Iodine‐123 Pyrazolo[4,3‐e]‐1,2,4‐triazolo[1,5‐c]pyrimidine Derivatives as PET and SPECT Radiotracers for Mapping A2A Receptors

Imaging agents that target adenosine type 2A (A_2A) receptors play an important role in evaluating new pharmaceuticals targeting these receptors, such as those currently being developed for the treatment of movement disorders like Parkinson′s disease. They are also useful for monitoring progression and treatment efficacy by providing a noninvasive tool to map changes in A_2A receptor density and function in neurodegenerative diseases. We previously described the successful evaluation of two A_2A‐specific radiotracers in both nonhuman primates and in subsequent human clinical trials: [¹²³I]MNI‐420 and [¹⁸F]MNI‐444. Herein we describe the development of both of these radiotracers by selection from a series of A_2A ligands, based on the pyrazolo[4,3‐e]‐1,2,4‐triazolo[1,5‐c]pyrimidine core of preladenant. Each of this series of 16 ligands was found to bind to recombinant human A_2A receptor in the low nanomolar range, and of these 16, six were radiolabeled with either fluorine‐18 or iodine‐123 and evaluated in nonhuman primates. These initial in vivo results resulted in the identification of 7‐(2‐(4‐(4‐(2‐[¹⁸F]fluoroethoxy)phenyl)piperazin‐1‐yl)ethyl)‐2‐(furan‐2‐yl)‐7H‐pyrazolo[4,3‐e][1,2,4]triazolo[1,5‐c]pyrimidin‐5‐amine ([¹⁸F]MNI‐444) and 7‐(2‐(4‐(2‐fluoro‐4‐[¹²³I]iodophenyl)piperazin‐1‐yl)ethyl)‐2‐(furan‐2‐yl)‐7H‐imidazo[1,2‐c]pyrazolo[4,3‐e]pyrimidin‐5‐amine ([¹²³I]MNI‐420) as PET and SPECT radiopharmaceuticals for mapping A_2A receptors in brain.     

Potent,Metabolically Stable 2‐Alkyl‐8‐(2H‐1,2,3‐triazol‐2‐yl)‐9H‐adenines as Adenosine A2A Receptor Ligands

Inhibition of adenosine A_2A receptors has been shown to elicit a therapeutic response in preclinical animal models of Parkinson’s disease (PD). We previously identified the triazolo‐9H‐purine, ST1535, as a potent A_2AR antagonist. Studies revealed that ST1535 is extensively hydroxylated at the ω‐1 position of the butyl side chain. Here, we describe the synthesis and evaluation of derivatives in which the ω‐1 position has been substituted (F, Me, OH) in order to block metabolism. The stability of the compounds was evaluated in human liver microsomes (HLM), and the affinity for A_2AR was determined. Two compounds, (2‐(3,3‐dimethylbutyl)‐9‐methyl‐8‐(2H‐1,2,3‐triazol‐2‐yl)‐9H‐purin‐6‐amine ( 3 b ) and 4‐(6‐amino‐9‐methyl‐8‐(2H‐1,2,3‐triazol‐2‐yl)‐9H‐purin‐2‐yl)‐2‐methylbutan‐2‐ol ( 3 c ), exhibited good affinity against A_2AR (K_i=0.4 nM and 2 nM , respectively) and high in vitro metabolic stability (89.5 % and 95.3 % recovery, respectively, after incubation with HLM for two hours).     

8‐Benzyltetrahydropyrazino[2,1‐f]purinediones: Water‐Soluble Tricyclic Xanthine Derivatives as Multitarget Drugs for Neurodegenerative Diseases

8‐Benzyl‐substituted tetrahydropyrazino[2,1‐f]purinediones were designed as tricyclic xanthine derivatives containing a basic nitrogen atom in the tetrahydropyrazine ring to improve water solubility. A library of 69 derivatives was prepared and evaluated in radioligand binding studies at adenosine receptor (AR) subtypes and for their ability to inhibit monoamine oxidases (MAO). Potent dual‐target‐directed A₁/A_2A adenosine receptor antagonists were identified. Several compounds showed triple‐target inhibition; one of the best compounds was 8‐(2,4‐dichloro‐5‐fluorobenzyl)‐1,3‐dimethyl‐6,7,8,9‐tetrahydropyrazino[2,1‐f]purine‐2,4(1H,3H)‐dione ( 72 ) (human AR: K_i A₁ 217 nM , A_2A 233 nM ; IC₅₀ MAO‐B: 508 nM ). Dichlorinated compound 36 [8‐(3,4‐dichlorobenzyl)‐1,3‐dimethyl‐6,7,8,9‐tetrahydropyrazino[2,1‐f]purine‐2,4(1H,3H)‐dione] was found to be the best triple‐target drug in rat (K_i A₁ 351 nM , A_2A 322 nm; IC₅₀ MAO‐B: 260 nM ), and may serve as a useful tool for preclinical proof‐of‐principle studies. Compounds that act at multiple targets relevant for symptomatic as well as disease‐modifying treatment of neurodegenerative diseases are expected to show advantages over single‐target therapeutics.     

Insight into the Interactions between Novel Coumarin Derivatives and Human A3 Adenosine Receptors

A study focused on the discovery of new chemical entities based on the 3‐arylcoumarin scaffold was performed with the aim of finding new adenosine receptor (AR) ligands. Thirteen synthesized compounds were evaluated by radioligand binding (A₁, A_2A, and A₃) and adenylyl cyclase activity (A_2B) assays in order to study their affinity for the four human AR (hAR) subtypes. Seven of the studied compounds proved to be selective A₃AR ligands, with 3‐(4′‐methylphenyl)‐8‐(2‐oxopropoxy)coumarin ( 12 ) being the most potent (K_i=634 nM ). None of the compounds showed affinity for the A_2B receptor, while four compounds were found to be nonselective AR ligands for the other three subtypes. Docking simulations were carried out to identify the hypothetical binding mode and to rationalize the interaction of these types of coumarin derivatives with the binding site of the three ARs to which binding was observed. The results allowed us to conclude that the 3‐arylcoumarin scaffold composes a novel and promising class of A₃AR ligands. ADME properties were also calculated, with the results suggesting that these compounds are promising leads for the identification of new drug candidates.     

Novel,Dual Target-Directed Annelated Xanthine Derivatives Acting on Adenosine Receptors and Monoamine Oxidase B

Annelated purinedione derivatives have been shown to act as possible multiple-target ligands, addressing adenosine receptors and monoaminooxidases. In this study, based on our previous results, novel annelated pyrimido- and diazepino[2,1-f]purinedione derivatives were designed as dual-target-directed ligands combining A_2A adenosine receptor (AR) antagonistic activity with blocking monoamine oxidase B. A library of 19 novel compounds was synthesized and biologically evaluated in radioligand binding studies at AR subtypes and for their ability to inhibit MAO-B. This allowed 9-(2-chloro-6-fluorobenzyl)-3-ethyl-1-methyl-6,7,8,9-tetrahydropyrimido[2,1-f]purine-2,4(1H,3H)-dione ( 13 e ; K_i human A_2AAR: 264 nM and IC₅₀ human MAO-B: 243 nM) to be identified as the most potent dual-acting ligand from this series. ADMET parameters were estimated in vitro, and analysis of the structure-activity relationships was complemented by molecular-docking studies based on previously published X-ray structures of the protein targets. Such dual-acting ligands, by selectively blocking A_2A AR, accompanied by the inhibition of dopamine metabolizing enzyme MAO-B, might provide symptomatic and neuroprotective effects in, among others, the treatment of Parkinson disease     

The Tertiary Amine Nitrogen Atom of Piperazine Sulfonamides as a Novel Determinant of Potent and Selective β3‐Adrenoceptor Agonists

Novel compounds were prepared in fair to good yields as human β₃‐adrenoceptor (β₃‐AR) agonists. In particular, aryloxypropanolamines 7 a – d (EC₅₀=0.57–2.1 nM ) and arylethanolamines 12 a , b , e (EC₅₀=6.38–19.4 nM ) were designed to explore the effects of modifications at the right‐hand side of these molecules on their activity as β₃‐AR agonists. Piperidine sulfonamides 15 a – c , e – g (EC₅₀=6.1–36.2 nM ) and piperazine sulfonamide derivatives 20 – 29 (EC₅₀=1.79–49.3 nM ) were examined as compounds bearing a non‐aromatic linker on the right‐ and left‐hand sides of the molecules. Some piperazine sulfonamides were found to be potent and selective β₃‐AR agonists, even if the amine nitrogen atom is tertiary and not secondary, as is the case for all β₃‐AR agonists reported so far. (S)‐3‐{4‐{N‐{4‐{2‐[2‐Hydroxy‐3‐(4‐hydroxyphenoxy)propylamino]ethyl}phenyl}sulfamoyl}phenoxy}propanoic acid ( 7 d ; EC₅₀=0.57 nM ), (R)‐N‐{4‐[2‐(2‐hydroxy‐2‐phenylethylamino)ethyl]phenyl}‐4‐(3‐octylureido)benzenesulfonamide ( 12 e ; EC₅₀=6.38 nM ), (R)‐2‐[1‐(4‐methoxyphenylsulfonyl)piperidin‐4‐ylamino]‐1‐phenylethanol ( 15 f ; EC₅₀=6.1 nM ), and (S)‐4‐{2‐hydroxy‐3‐[4‐(4‐methoxyphenylsulfonyl)piperazin‐1‐yl]propoxy}phenol ( 25 ; EC₅₀=1.79 nM ) were found to be the most potent β₃‐AR agonists of the aryloxypropanolamine, arylethanolamine, piperidine sulfonamide, and piperazine sulfonamide classes, respectively. The two most potent compounds were identified as possible candidates for further development of β₃‐AR agonists useful in the treatment of β₃‐AR‐mediated pathological conditions.     

2‐Amino[1,2,4]triazolo[1,5‐c]quinazolines and Derived Novel Heterocycles: Syntheses and Structure–Activity Relationships of Potent Adenosine Receptor Antagonists

2‐Amino[1,2,4]triazolo[1,5‐c]quinazolines were identified as potent adenosine receptor (AR) antagonists. Synthetic strategies were devised to gain access to a broad range of derivatives including novel polyheterocyclic compounds. Potent and selective A₃AR antagonists were discovered, including 3,5‐diphenyl[1,2,4]triazolo[4,3‐c]quinazoline ( 17 , K_i human A₃AR 1.16 nm ) and 5′‐phenyl‐1,2‐dihydro‐3′H‐spiro[indole‐3,2′‐[1,2,4]triazolo[1,5‐c]quinazolin]‐2‐one ( 20 , K_i human A₃AR 6.94 nm ). In addition, multitarget antagonists were obtained, such as the dual A₁/A₃ antagonist 2,5‐diphenyl[1,2,4]triazolo[1,5‐c]quinazoline ( 13 b , K_i human A₁AR 51.6 nm , human A₃AR 11.1 nm ), and the balanced pan‐AR antagonists 5‐(2‐thienyl)[1,2,4]triazolo[1,5‐c]quinazolin‐2‐amine ( 11 c , K_i human A₁AR 131 nm , A_2AAR 32.7 nm , A_2BAR 150 nm , A₃AR 47.5 nm ) and 9‐bromo‐5‐phenyl[1,2,4]triazolo[1,5‐c]quinazolin‐2‐amine ( 11 q , K_i human A₁AR 67.7 nm , A_2AAR 13.6 nm , A_2BAR 75.0 nm , A₃AR 703 nm ). In many cases, significantly different affinities for human and rat receptors were observed, which emphasizes the need for caution in extrapolating conclusions between different species.     

Targeting Adenosine Receptors: A Potential Pharmacological Avenue for Acute and Chronic Pain

Adenosine is a purine nucleoside, responsible for the regulation of multiple physiological and pathological cellular and tissue functions by activation of four G protein-coupled receptors (GPCR), namely A₁, A_2A, A_2B, and A₃ adenosine receptors (ARs). In recent years, extensive progress has been made to elucidate the role of adenosine in pain regulation. Most of the antinociceptive effects of adenosine are dependent upon A₁AR activation located at peripheral, spinal, and supraspinal sites. The role of A_2AAR and A_2BAR is more controversial since their activation has both pro- and anti-nociceptive effects. A₃AR agonists are emerging as promising candidates for neuropathic pain. Although their therapeutic potential has been demonstrated in diverse preclinical studies, no AR ligands have so far reached the market. To date, novel pharmacological approaches such as adenosine regulating agents and allosteric modulators have been proposed to improve efficacy and limit side effects enhancing the effect of endogenous adenosine. This review aims to provide an overview of the therapeutic potential of ligands interacting with ARs and the adenosinergic system for the treatment of acute and chronic pain.     

GluN2B‐Selective N‐Methyl‐d‐aspartate (NMDA) Receptor Antagonists Derived from 3‐Benzazepines: Synthesis and Pharmacological Evaluation of Benzo[7]annulen‐7‐amines

Given their high neuroprotective potential, ligands that block GluN2B‐containing N‐methyl‐D ‐aspartate (NMDA) receptors by interacting with the ifenprodil binding site located on the GluN2B subunit are of great interest for the treatment of various neuronal disorders. In this study, a novel class of GluN2B‐selective NMDA receptor antagonists with the benzo[7]annulene scaffold was prepared and pharmacologically evaluated. The key intermediate, N‐(2‐methoxy‐5‐oxo‐6,7,8,9‐tetrahydro‐5H‐benzo[7]annulen‐7‐yl)acetamide ( 11 ), was obtained by cyclization of 3‐acetamido‐5‐(3‐methoxyphenyl)pentanoic acid ( 10 b ). The final reaction steps comprise hydrolysis of the amide, reduction of the ketone, and reductive alkylation, leading to cis‐ and trans‐configured 7‐(ω‐phenylalkylamino)benzo[7]annulen‐5‐ols. High GluN2B affinity was observed with cis‐configured γ‐amino alcohols substituted with a 3‐phenylpropyl moiety at the amino group. Removal of the benzylic hydroxy moiety led to the most potent GluN2B antagonists of this series: 2‐methoxy‐N‐(3‐phenylpropyl)‐6,7,8,9‐tetrahydro‐5H‐benzo[7]annulen‐7‐amine ( 20 a , K_i=10 nM ) and 2‐methoxy‐N‐methyl‐N‐(3‐phenylpropyl)‐6,7,8,9‐tetrahydro‐5H‐benzo[7]annulen‐7‐amine ( 23 a , K_i=7.9 nM ). The selectivity over related receptors (phencyclidine binding site of the NMDA receptor, σ₁ and σ₂ receptors) was recorded. In a functional assay measuring the cytoprotective activity of the benzo[7]annulenamines, all tested compounds showed potent NMDA receptor antagonistic activity. Cytotoxicity induced via GluN2A subunit‐containing NMDA receptors was not inhibited by the new ligands.     

Structure–Activity Relationships of Quinoxaline‐Based 5‐HT3A and 5‐HT3AB Receptor‐Selective Ligands

Until recently, discriminating between homomeric 5‐HT₃A and heteromeric 5‐HT₃AB receptors was only possible with ligands that bind in the receptor pore. This study describes the first series of ligands that can discriminate between these receptor types at the level of the orthosteric binding site. During a recent fragment screen, 2‐chloro‐3‐(4‐methylpiperazin‐1‐yl)quinoxaline (VUF10166) was identified as a ligand that displays an 83‐fold difference in [³H]granisetron binding affinity between 5‐HT₃A and 5‐HT₃AB receptors. Fragment hit exploration, initiated from VUF10166 and 3‐(4‐methylpiperazin‐1‐yl)quinoxalin‐2‐ol, resulted in a series of compounds with higher affinity at either 5‐HT₃A or 5‐HT₃AB receptors. These ligands reveal that a single atom is sufficient to change the selectivity profile of a compound. At the extremes of the new compounds were 2‐amino‐3‐(4‐methylpiperazin‐1‐yl)quinoxaline, which showed 11‐fold selectivity for the 5‐HT₃A receptor, and 2‐(4‐methylpiperazin‐1‐yl)quinoxaline, which showed an 8.3‐fold selectivity for the 5‐HT₃AB receptor. These compounds represent novel molecular tools for studying 5‐HT₃ receptor subtypes and could help elucidate their physiological roles.     

The Versatile 2‐Substituted Imidazoline Nucleus as a Structural Motif of Ligands Directed to the Serotonin 5‐HT1A Receptor

The involvement of the serotonin 5‐HT_1A receptor (5‐HT_1A‐R) in the antidepressant effect of allyphenyline and its analogues indicates that ligands bearing the 2‐substituted imidazoline nucleus as a structural motif interact with 5‐HT_1A‐R. Therefore, we examined the 5‐HT_1A‐R profile of several imidazoline molecules endowed with a common scaffold consisting of an aromatic moiety linked to the 2‐position of an imidazoline nucleus by a biatomic bridge. Our aim was to discover other ligands targeting 5‐HT_1A‐R and to identify the structural features favoring 5‐HT_1A‐R interaction. Structure–activity relationships, supported by modeling studies, suggested that some structural cliché such as a polar function and a methyl group in the bridge, as well as proper steric hindrance in the aromatic area of the above scaffold, favored 5‐HT_1A‐R recognition and activation. We also highlighted the potent antidepressant‐like effect (mouse forced swimming test) of (S)‐(+)‐ 19 [(S)‐(+)‐naphtyline] at very low dose (0.01 mg kg^?1). This effect was clearly mediated by 5‐HT_1A, as it was significantly reduced by pretreatment with the 5‐HT_1A antagonist WAY100635.     

(2,2‐Diphenyl‐[1,3]oxathiolan‐5‐ylmethyl)‐(3‐phenyl‐propyl)‐amine: a Potent and Selective 5‐HT1A Receptor Agonist

A selective 5‐HT _1A receptor agonist : A new series of ligands acting at 5‐HT_1A serotonin receptor were identified. Among them (2,2‐diphenyl‐[1,3]oxathiolan‐5‐yl‐methyl)‐(3‐phenyl‐propyl)amine (shown) possesses outstanding activity (pK_i=8.72, pD₂=7.67, E_max=85) and selectivity (5‐HT_1A/α_1D>150), and represents a new 5‐HT_1A agonist chemotype.

     

Synthesis and Pharmacological Evaluation of SNC80 Analogues with a Bridged Piperazine Ring

To discover novel δ‐opioid receptor ligands derived from SNC80 ( 1 ), a series of 6,8‐diazabicyclo[3.2.2]nonane derivatives bearing two aromatic moieties was prepared, and the affinity toward δ, μ, and κ receptors, as well as σ receptors, was investigated. After removal of the 4‐methoxybenzyl and 2,4‐dimethoxybenzyl protecting groups, the pharmacophoric N,N‐diethylcarbamoylbenzyl residue was attached to the 6,8‐diazabicyclo[3.2.2]nonane framework to yield the designed δ receptor ligands. In a first series of compounds the benzhydryl moiety of SNC80 was dissected, and one phenyl ring was attached to the bicyclic framework. In a second series of δ ligands the complete benzhydryl moiety was introduced into the bicyclic scaffold. The determined δ receptor affinities show that compounds based on an (R)‐glutamate‐derived bicyclic scaffold possess higher δ receptor affinity than their (S)‐glutamate‐derived counterparts. Furthermore, an intact benzhydryl moiety leads to δ receptor ligands that are more potent than compounds with two separated aromatic moieties. Compound 24 , with the same spatial arrangement of substituents around the benzhydryl stereocenter as SNC80, shows the highest δ receptor affinity of this series: K_i=24 nM . Whereas the highly potent δ ligands reveal good selectivity against μ and κ receptors, the σ₁ and/or σ₂ affinities of some compounds are almost in the same range as their δ receptor affinities, such as compound 25 (σ₂: K_i=83 nM ; δ: K_i=75 nM ). In [³⁵S]GTPγS assays the most potent δ ligands 24 and 25 showed almost the same intrinsic activity as the full agonist SNC80, proving the agonistic activity of 24 and 25 . The enantiomeric 4‐benzylidene derivatives 15 and ent‐ 15 showed selective cytotoxicity toward the 5637 (bladder) and A‐427 (small‐cell lung) human tumor cell lines.     

MT1‐Selective Melatonin Receptor Ligands: Synthesis,Pharmacological Evaluation,and Molecular Dynamics Investigation of N‐{[(3‐O‐Substituted)anilino]alkyl}amides

The design of compounds selective for the MT₁ melatonin receptor is still a challenging task owing to the limited knowledge of the structural features conferring selectivity for the MT₁ subtype, and only few selective compounds have been reported so far. N‐(Anilinoalkyl)amides are a versatile class of melatonin receptor ligands that include nonselective MT₁/MT₂ agonists and MT₂‐selective antagonists. We synthesized a new series of N‐(anilinoalkyl)amides bearing 3‐arylalkyloxy or 3‐alkyloxy substituents at the aniline ring, looking for new potent and MT₁‐selective ligands. To evaluate the effect of substituent size and shape on binding affinity and intrinsic activity, both flexible and conformationally constrained derivatives were prepared. The phenylbutyloxy substituent gave the best result, providing the partial agonist 4 a , which was endowed with high MT₁ binding affinity (pK_i=8.93) and 78‐fold selectivity for the MT₁ receptor. To investigate the molecular basis for agonist recognition, and to explain the role of the 3‐arylalkyloxy substituent, we built a homology model of the MT₁ receptor based on the β₂ adrenergic receptor crystal structure in its activated state. A binding mode for MT₁ agonists is proposed, as well as a hypothesis regarding the receptor structural features responsible for MT₁ selectivity of compounds with lipophilic arylalkyloxy substituents.     

Modulation on C‐ and N‐Terminal Moieties of a Series of Potent and Selective Linear Tachykinin NK2 Receptor Antagonists

Herein we describe the synthesis of a series of new potent tachykinin NK₂ receptor antagonists by the modulation of the C‐ and N‐terminal moieties of ibodutant (MEN 15596, 1 ). The N‐terminal benzo[b]thiophene ring was replaced by different substituted naphthalenes and benzofurans, while further modifications were evaluated at the C‐terminal tetrahydropyran moiety. Most compounds demonstrated a high affinity for the human NK₂ receptor and high in vitro antagonist potency, indicating that a wide range of substituents at both termini can be incorporated in the molecule without detrimental effects on the interactions with the NK₂ receptor. Selected compounds were tested in vivo confirming their activity as NK₂ antagonists. In particular, after both iv and id administration to guinea pig, compound 61 b was able to antagonize NK₂‐induced colonic contractions with a potency and duration‐of‐action fully comparable to the reference compound 1 (MEN 15596, ibodutant).     

Structure‐Based Virtual Screening for Dopamine D2 Receptor Ligands as Potential Antipsychotics

Structure‐based virtual screening using a D₂ receptor homology model was performed to identify dopamine D₂ receptor ligands as potential antipsychotics. From screening a library of 6.5 million compounds, 21 were selected and were subjected to experimental validation. From these 21 compounds tested, ten D₂ ligands were identified (47.6 % success rate, among them D₂ receptor antagonists, as expected) that have additional affinity for other receptors tested, in particular 5‐HT_2A receptors. The affinity (K_i values) of the compounds ranged from 58 nm to about 24 μm . Similarity and fragment analysis indicated a significant degree of structural novelty among the identified compounds. We found one D₂ receptor antagonist that did not have a protonatable nitrogen atom, which is a key structural element of the classical D₂ pharmacophore model necessary for interaction with the conserved Asp(3.32) residue. This compound exhibited greater than 20‐fold binding selectivity for the D₂ receptor over the D₃ receptor. We provide additional evidence that the amide hydrogen atom of this compound forms a hydrogen bond with Asp(3.32), as determined by tests of its derivatives that cannot maintain this interaction.     

N‐(Anilinoethyl)amides: Design and Synthesis of Metabolically Stable,Selective Melatonin Receptor Ligands

The class of N‐(anilinoethyl)amides includes melatonin receptor ligands with varied subtype selectivity and intrinsic activity. One of these ligands, the MT₂‐selective partial agonist UCM765 (N‐{2‐[(3‐methoxyphenyl)phenylamino]ethyl}acetamide), had evidenced hypnotic effects in rodents at doses ≥40 mg kg^?1 (s.c.), in spite of its sub‐nanomolar affinity for human melatonin receptors. Supposing that its low in vivo potency could be due, at least in part, to metabolic liability in rat liver, UCM765 was incubated with rat liver S9 fraction and rat, mouse, or human microsomes, and the major metabolites were identified by LC–MS, synthesized, and in vitro tested for their affinity toward MT₁ and MT₂ receptors. The obtained information was exploited to design novel analogues of UCM765 that are more resistant to in vitro oxidative degradation, while maintaining a similar binding profile. The analogue UCM924 (N‐{2‐[(3‐bromophenyl)‐(4‐fluorophenyl)amino]ethyl}acetamide) displayed a binding profile similar to that of UCM765 on cloned human receptors (MT₂‐selective partial agonist) and a significantly longer half‐life in the presence of rat liver S9 fraction.     

Bivalent Argininamide‐Type Neuropeptide Y Y1 Antagonists Do Not Support the Hypothesis of Receptor Dimerisation

Bivalent ligands are potential tools to investigate the dimerisation of G‐protein‐coupled receptors. Based on the (R)‐argininamide BIBP 3226, a potent and selective neuropeptide Y Y₁ receptor (Y₁R) antagonist, we prepared a series of bivalent Y₁R ligands with a wide range of linker lengths (8–36 atoms). Exploiting the high eudismic ratio (>1000) of the parent compound, we synthesised sets of R,R‐, R,S‐ and S,S‐configured bivalent ligands to gain insight into the “bridging” of two Y₁Rs by simultaneous interaction with both binding sites of a putative receptor dimer. Except for the S,S isomers, the bivalent ligands are high‐affinity Y₁R antagonists, as determined by Ca²⁺ assays on HEL cells and radioligand competition assays on human Y₁R‐expressing SK‐N‐MC and MCF‐7 cells. Whereas the R,R enantiomers are most potent, no marked differences were observed relative to the corresponding meso forms. The difference between R,R and R,S diastereomers was most pronounced (about sixfold) in the case of the Y₁R antagonist containing a spacer of 20 atoms in length. Among the R,R enantiomers, linker length and structural diversity had little effect on Y₁R affinity. Although the bivalent ligands preferentially bind to the Y₁R, the selectivity toward human Y₂, Y₄, and Y₅ receptors was markedly lower than that of the monovalent argininamides. The results of this study neither support the presence of Y₁R dimers nor the simultaneous occupation of both binding pockets by the twin compounds. However, as the interaction with Y₁R dimers cannot be unequivocally ruled out, the preparation of a bivalent radioligand is suggested to determine the ligand–receptor stoichiometry. Aiming at such radiolabelled pharmacological tools, prototype twin compounds were synthesised, containing an N‐propionylated amino‐functionalised branched linker (K_i≥18 nM ), a tritiated form of which can be easily prepared.