Phase Behaviour of Poly(ethylene oxide)/Poly(styrene-co-maleic anhydride) Blends

Thermal behaviour and morphology of blends of poly(ethylene oxide) (PEO) and poly(styrene-co-maleic anhydride) (SMA) prepared by the coprecipitation technique were studied by means of differential scanning calorimetry, optical microscopy and thermogravimetry. SMA containing 25wt% maleic anhydride (MA) was found to be miscible with PEO when the SMA content was greater than 80%. The melting temperature and crystallinity depended on the composition of the blend. SMA appears to segregate interlamellarly during the isothermal crystallization of PEO. The thermal stability of blends was enhanced and was higher than that of pure PEO and SMA. © of SCI.     

Dielectric relaxation study of poly(styrene-co-4-vinylbenzoic acid)/poly(ethyl methacrylate-co-4-vinylpyridine) blends

Summary The α-relaxations, located in the neighborhood of glass-transition region (Tg), of a styrene-co-4-vinylbenzoic acid (PSVBA) random copolymer blended in several weight proportions with an ethyl methacrylate-co-4-vinylpyridine (PEMAVP) random copolymer have been investigated by dielectric spectroscopy in the temperature and frequency ranging from 25 to 180 °C and 0.1 to 100 kHz, respectively. The analysis of the obtained results shows that the dielectric spectra of the miscible blends, essentially dominated by the response of PEMAVP, are composition dependent becoming broader with its content. These observations are correlated with segmental dynamic heterogeneities and blend concentration fluctuations. Received: 21 December 1998/Revised version: 21 March 1999/Accepted: 20 April 1999     

Novel blends of alternating propene-carbon monoxide copolymers and styrenic copolymers

Summary Alternating propene-carbon monoxide copolymers (P-CO) were melt-blended with polystyrene, poly(styrene-co-acrylonitrile) (SAN), and with poly(styrene-co-maleic anhydride) (SMA). P-CO forms homogeneously miscible blends with SAN containing 25 wt% AN at the investigated blend compositions. The transparent blends have single, intermediate glass transition temperatures that fit the Fox equation. The elastic properties of P-CO at room temperature disappear upon blending with SAN because the T _g is driven above RT. Polystyrene and SMA are not miscible with P-CO and form heterogeneous blends with two glass transitions. This demonstrates that both the polarity of the styrenic copolymer and the nature of the comonomer govern its phase behavior. Received: 14 January 1999/Revised version: 19 April 1999/Accepted: 19 April 1999     

Compatibility behavior in thermoplastic polymer blends containing poly(t-butylstyrene-co-acrylonitrile)

The phase behavior of a series of binary component polymer blends of poly(ε-caprolactone) (PCL) and poly(t-butylstyrene-co-acrylonitrile) (TBSAN) containing varying contents of acrylonitrile (AN) was examined to determine the influence of copolymer composition and PCL content on blend miscibility or immiscibility. Thermal measurements were extensively used to determine phase behavior, i.e., a single compositionally dependent glass transition temperature implies blend miscibility. Otherwise, immiscibility is assumed to dominant blend behavior. It was determined that TBSAN and PCL form miscible blends over a broad range of AN content, i.e., spanning from below 43.2 mol % (19.8 wt %) to about 66.4 mol % (39.6 wt %), a range considerably different from that found in poly(styrene-co-acrylonitrile) copolymers. TBSAN-containing blends were found to be immiscible when the AN content is less than about 43 mol % or greater than about 67 mol %. Small-angle light-scattering and polarized light microscopy was used to probe the substantial morphological changes in the miscible blends. Little change was observed in the immiscible blends. These results clarify the phase separation observed in these blend systems. © 1993 John Wiley & Sons, Inc.     

Study of the miscibility of poly(ethyl methacrylate-co-4-vinylpyridine)/poly(styrene-co-cinnamic acid) blends

Summary The miscibility of a series of poly(ethyl methacrylate-co-4-vinylpyridine) with poly(styrene-co-cinnamic acid), is investigated by differential scanning calorimetry. The results show that each blend is miscible as ascertained by a single composition dependent glass transition temperature. The Tg's of the blends exhibit positive deviations from the weight average Tg's of the blend components. The thermograms data exploited according to the Kwei and Schneider approaches suggest the occurrence of strong specific intermolecular attractive interactions within the binary systems. The strength of these interactions, as estimated from the Kwei q-values, increases with the proton donor and proton acceptor contents in the copolymers. Received: 23 January 1999/Revised version: 29 April 1999/Accepted: 1 June 1999     

Interpolymer‐specific interactions and miscibility in poly(styrene‐co‐acrylic acid)/poly(styrene‐co‐N,N‐dimethylacrylamide) blends

The miscibility or complexation of poly(styrene‐co‐acrylic acid) containing 27 mol % of acrylic acid (SAA‐27) and poly(styrene‐co‐N,N‐dimethylacrylamide) containing 17 or 32 mol % of N,N‐dimethylacrylamide (SAD‐17, SAD‐32) or poly(N,N‐dimethylacrylamide) (PDMA) were investigated by different techniques. The differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) analysis showed that a single glass‐transition temperature was observed for all the mixtures prepared from tetrahydrofuran (THF) or butan‐2‐one. This is an evidence of their miscibility or complexation over the entire composition range. As the content of the basic constituent increases as within SAA‐27/SAD‐32 and SAA‐27/PDMA, higher number of specific interpolymer interactins occurred and led to the formation of interpolymer complexes in butan‐2‐one. The qualitative Fourier transform infrared (FTIR) spectroscopy study carried out for SAA‐27/SAD‐17 blends revealed that hydrogen bonding occurred between the hydroxyl groups of SAA‐27 and the carbonyl amide of SAD‐17. Quantitative analysis carried out in the 160–210°C temperature range for the SAA‐27 copolymer and its blends of different ratios using the Painter–Coleman association model led to the estimation of the equilibrium constants K₂, K_A and the enthalpies of hydrogen bond formation. These blends are miscible even at 180°C as confirmed from the negative values of the total free energy of mixing ΔG_M over the entire blend composition. © 2006 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 103: 1011–1024, 2007     

Morphology and thermal behavior of organo‐bentonite clay/poly(styrene‐co‐methacrylic acid)/poly(isobutyl methacrylate‐co‐4‐vinylpyridine) nanocomposites

Poly(styrene‐co‐methacrylic acid) containing 29 mol % of methacrylic acid (SMA‐29) and poly(isobutyl methacrylate‐co‐4‐vinylpyridine) containing 20 mol % of 4‐vinylpyridine (IBM4VP‐20) were synthesized, characterized, and used to elaborate binary and ternary nanocomposites of different ratios with a 3% by weight hexadecylammonium‐modified bentonite from Maghnia (Algeria) by casting method from tetrahydrofuran (THF) solutions. The morphology and the thermal behavior of these binary and ternary elaborated nanocomposites were investigated by X‐ray diffraction, scanning electron microscopy, FTIR spectroscopy, differential scanning calorimetry, and thermogravimetry. Polymer nanocomposites and nanoblends of different morphologies were obtained. The effect of the organoclay and its dispersion within the blend matrix on the phase behavior of the miscible SMA29/IBM4VP20 blends is discussed. The obtained results showed that increasing the amount of SMA29 in the IBM4VP20/SMA29 blend leads to near exfoliated nanostructure with significantly improved thermal stability. © 2009 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci, 2009     

Fourier transform infrared spectroscopic studies of the poly(styrene-co-acrylonitrile) and poly (vinyl chloride-co-vinyl acetate) blends

The Fourier transform infrared (FTIR) spectroscopic studies of the poly-(styrene-co-acrylonitrile) (SAN) and poly(vinyl chloride-co-vinyl acetate) (VYHH) blends produced by different blending techniques, viz., solution blending, melt-blending, and also the co-precipitation methods of blending, were performed. In the case of miscible blend systems, substantial band shiftings took place, whereas immiscible blend systems showed slight or no band shifting. The miscible blends showed a substantial residual spectrum which was absent in the case of the immiscible system when a similar subtraction process was carried out. © 1997 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 63: 991–1000, 1997     

Miscibility of poly(2,6-dimethyl-1,4-phenylene oxide)/poly(vinyl pyrrolidone) blends

The miscibility of blends of poly(2,6-dimethyl-1,4-phenylene oxide) (PPO) and poly(vinylpyrrolidone) (PVP) was studied by differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) through the analysis of the glass transition temperature Tg. The dependence of Tg with the annealing temperature was determined for PPO and PVP samples of different molecular weights. The phase diagrams for blends containing three different PVP samples were established. Blends of PPO and PVP were found to be miscible for composition lower than 30% and higher than 65% of PVP. A inmiscibility window between 30 and 65% of PVP is also described.     

Impact-modified poly(styrene-co-acrylonitrile) blends containing both oxazoline-functionalized poly(ethene-co-1-octene) elastomers and poly(styrene-co-maleic anhydride) as compatibilizer

Blends of a poly(styrene-co-acrylonitrile) (SAN) with poly(ethene-co-1-octene) rubber (EOR) were investigated. An improved toughness–stiffness balance was obtained when adding as a compatibilizer a blend consisting of oxazoline-functionalized EOR, prepared by grafting EOR with oxazoline-functional maleinate, and poly(styrene-co-maleic anhydride) (SMA), which is miscible with SAN. Enhanced interfacial adhesion was evidenced by the improved dispersion of the EOR in the SAN matrix and the reduced glass transition temperature of the dispersed EOR phase. Morphology studies using transmission electron microscopy revealed formation of an interphase between the matrix and the rubber particles. © 1999 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 73: 1685–1695, 1999     

Effect of poly(styrene‐co‐maleic anhydride) imidization on the miscibility and phase‐separation temperatures of poly(styrene‐co‐maleic anhydride)/poly(vinyl methyl ether) and poly(styrene‐co‐maleic anhydride)/ poly(methyl methacrylate) blends

The objective of this work was to study the miscibility and phase‐separation temperatures of poly(styrene‐co‐maleic anhydride) (SMA)/poly(vinyl methyl ether) (PVME) and SMA/poly(methyl methacrylate) (PMMA) blends with differential scanning calorimetry and small‐angle light scattering techniques. We focused on the effect of SMA partial imidization with aniline on the miscibility and phase‐separation temperatures of these blends. The SMA imidization reaction led to a partially imidized styrene N‐phenyl succinimide copolymer (SMI) with a degree of conversion of 49% and a decomposition temperature higher than that of SMA by about 20°C. We observed that both SMI/PVME and SMI/PMMA blends had lower critical solution temperature behavior. The imidization of SMA increased the phase‐separation temperature of the SMA/PVME blend and decreased that of the SMA/PMMA blend. © 2008 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci, 2008     

Separation of water/ethanol mixture through poly(acrylonitrile-co-acrylic acid)/poly(ethylene oxide) membranes by pervaporation

The separation of water/ethanol mixtures was investigated by poly(acrylonitrile-co-acrylic acid) and by poly(acrylonitrile-co-acrylic acid)/poly(ethylene oxide) blend membranes. The flux increased with the content of acrylic acid in copolymers and the selectivity remained constant. The marked increase of the selectivity was observed for blend membranes of a certain blend ratio, suggesting that the two polymers are partially miscible. Poly(ethylene oxide) in blends was thought to act as a plasticizer as well as a preferentially water absorbing and diffusing component. © 1994 John Wiley & Sons, Inc.     

Effect of dehydrochlorination of PVC on miscibility and phase separation of binary and ternary blends of poly(vinyl chloride), poly(ethylene-co-vinyl acetate) and poly(styrene-co-acrylonitrile)

The enhancement of miscibility at the lower critical solution temperature (LCST) of the blends poly(vinyl chloride)/poly(ethylene-co-vinyl acetate) (PVC/EVA), poly(vinyl chloride)/poly(styrene-co-acrylonitrile) (PVC/SAN) and poly(vinyl chloride)/poly(ethylene-co-vinyl acetate)/poly(styrene-co-acrylonitrile) (PVC/EVA/SAN) was observed at the micron level. Such miscibility is attributed to the dehydrochlorination and formation of hydrogen bonds between blend components. However, macrolevel immiscibility of these blends heated to the LCST was observed. Such microdomain compatibility of these blends gives a synergistic character. Brittle-type failure observed for LCST samples testifies to the synergism in treated blends. ©1997 SCI     

Miscibility of copolycarbonate blends with poly(styrene-co-acrylonitrile) copolymer and their interaction energies

The phase behavior of dimethyl polycarbonate-tetramethyl polycarbonate (DMPC-TMPC) blends with poly(styrene-co-acrylonitrile) copolymers (SAN) and the interaction energies of binary pairs involved in blend has been explored. DMPC-TMPC copolycarbonates containing 60 wt% TMPC or more were formed miscible blends with SAN containing limited amounts of AN. The miscibility of copolycarbonate with SAN decreases as the DMPC content increases. The miscible blends showed the LCST-type phase behavior or did not phase separate until thermal degradation. The binary interaction energies involved in the miscible blends were calculated from the phase boundaries using the lattice-fluid theory combined with binary interaction model. The phenyl ring substitution with methyl groups did not lead to interactions that are favorable for miscibility with polyacrylonitrile (PAN). The interaction energies of the polycarbonates blends with SAN copolymers as a function of AN content were obtained. It was revealed that the incline of the number of methyl groups on the phenyl rings of bisphenol-A unit acts favorably for the miscibility with SAN copolymer when SAN contains less than about 30 wt% AN and shifts the most favorable interaction to the low AN content.     

Miscibility and phase behavior in blends containing random copolymers of poly(ether ether ketone) and phenolphthalein poly(ether ether ketone)

The miscibility and phase behavior of polysulfone (PSF) and poly(hydroxyether of bisphenol A) (phenoxy) with a series of copoly (ether ether ketone) (COPEEK), a random copolymer of poly(ether ether ketone) (PEEK), and phenolphthalein poly(ether ether ketone) (PEK-C) was studied using differential scanning calorimetry. A COPEEK copolymer containing 6 mol % ether ether ketone (EEK) repeat units is miscible with PSF, whereas copolymers containing 12mol % EEK and more are not. COPEEK copolymers containing 6 and 12 mol % EEK are completely miscible with phenoxy, but those containing 24 mol % EEK is partially miscible with phenoxy. Moreover, a copolymer containing 17 mol % EEK is partially miscible with phenoxy; the blends show two transitions in the midcomposition region and single transitions at either extreme. Two T_gs were observed for the 50/50 blend of phenoxy with the coplymer containing 17 mol % EEK, whereas a single composition-dependent T_g appeared for all the other compositions. An FTIR study revealed that there exist hydrogen-bonding interactions between phenoxy and the copolymers. The strengths of the hydrogen-bonding interactions in the blends of the COPEEK copolymers containing 6 and 12 mol % EEK are the same as that in the phenoxy/PEK-C blend. However, for the blends of copolymers containing 17, 24, and 28 mol % EEK, the hydrogen-bonding interactions become increasingly unfavorable and the self-association of the hydroxyl groups of phenoxy is preferable as the content of EEK units in the copolymer increases. The observed miscibility was interpreted qualitatively in terms of the mean-field approach. © 1996 John Wiley & Sons, Inc.     

In situ compatibilization of polystyrene and polyurethane blends by using poly(styrene-co-maleic anhydride) as reactive compatibilizer

Blends of polystyrene (PS) and polyurethane (PU) elastomer were obtained by melt mixing, using poly(styrene-co-maleic anhydride) (SMA) containing 7 wt % of maleic anhydride groups as a reactive compatibilizer. Polyurethanes containing polyester flexible segments, PU-es, and polyether flexible segments, PU-et, were used. These polyurethanes were crosslinked with dicumyl peroxide or sulfur to improve their mechanical properties. The anhydride groups of SMA can react with the PU groups and form an in situ graft copolymer at the interface of the blends during their preparation. The rheological behavior was accompanied by torque versus time curves and an increase in the torque during the melt mixing was observed for all the reactive blends, indicating the occurrence of a reaction. Solubility tests, gel permeation chromatography, and scanning electronic microscopy confirmed the formation of a graft copolymer generated in situ during the melt blending. These results also indicate that this graft copolymer contains C C bond between SMA and PU chains. © 2001 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 82: 2514–2524, 2001     

Phase behavior of binary and ternary blends of poly(styrene‐co‐methacrylic acid), poly(styrene‐co‐4‐vinylpyridine), and poly(2,6‐dimethyl‐1,4‐phenylene oxide)

Poly(styrene‐co‐methacrylic acid) (PSMA) and poly(styrene‐co‐4‐vinylpyridine) (PS4VP) of different compositions were prepared and characterized. The phase behavior of these copolymers as binary PSMA/PS4VP mixtures or with poly(2,6‐dimethyl‐1,4‐phenylene oxide) (PPO) as PPO/PSMA or PPO/PS4VP and PPO/PSMA/PS4VP ternary blends was investigated by differential scanning calorimetry (DSC). This study showed that PPO was miscible with PS4VP containing up to 15 mol % 4‐vinylpyridine (4VP) but immiscible with PS4VP‐30 (where the number following the hyphen refers to the percentage 4VP in the polymer) and PSMA‐20 (where the number following the hyphen refers to the percentage methacrylic acid in the polymer) over the entire composition range. To examine the morphology of the immiscible blends, scanning electron microscopy was used. Because of the hydrogen‐bonding specific interactions that occurred between the carboxylic groups of PSMA and the pyridine groups of PS4VP, chloroform solutions of PSMA‐20 and PS4VP‐15 formed interpolymer complexes. The obtained glass‐transition temperatures (T_g's) of the PSMA‐20/PS4VP‐15 complexes were found to be higher than those calculated from the additivity rule. Although, depending on the content of 4VP, the shape of the T_g of the PPO/PS4VP blends changed from concave to S‐shaped in the case of the miscible blends, two T_g were observed with each PPO/PS4VP‐30 and PPO/PS4VP‐40 blend. The thermal stability of the PSMA‐20/PS4VP‐15 interpolymer complexes was studied by thermogravimetry. On the basis of the obtained results, the phase behavior of the ternary PPO/PSMA‐20/PS4VP‐15 blends was investigated by DSC. © 2007 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci, 2008     

Reactive compatibilization of the polyamide 6/poly(phenylene oxide) blend by means of styrene–maleic anhydride copolymer

The compatibilization of the polymer blend polyamide 6/poly(phenylene oxide) (PA-6/PPO) system has been studied using the reactive random copolymer styrene–maleic anhydride (SMA) as a compatibilizer precursor. SMA is miscible with PPO when the MA content of SMA is not higher than 8 wt %. The anhydride groups of SMA react with the amino end groups of PA-6 during melt blending to form a graft copolymer at the interface with a compatibilizing effect as a result. Two different blending procedures were compared to each other and the compatibilizing effect of the added SMA was evaluated for a matrix/dispersed particle type of morphology. The effect of the different material parameters such as the functionality of SMA (wt % MA in SMA) and the molecular weight of PA-6, and blending parameters such as the extrusion time was analyzed with respect to the blend phase morphology. Finally, the amount of reacted MA groups in the blends PA-6/(PPO/SMA) was determined with FTIR after the use of an extraction method to remove the PA-6 matrix phase. The comparison between the morphological data (particle size reduction of the dispersed PPO/SMA phase) and the FTIR data (amount of reacted MA groups) of the blends considered, turned out to be very logical. © 1999 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 73: 889–898, 1999     

Miscibility, thermal characterization and crystallization of poly(l-lactide) and poly(tetramethylene adipate-co-terephthalate) blend membranes

Binary blend membranes of biodegradable poly(l-lactide) (PLLA) with poly(tetramethylene adipate-co-terephthalate) (PTAT) copolymer were prepared by solution casting via air evaporation. The miscibility of PLLA/PTAT blends was studied by dynamic mechanical analysis (DMA) and thermal mechanical analysis (TMA) in a tensile mode. Differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) measurement was carried out. The surface microstructure and tensile properties of the blend membranes were examined using atomic force microscopy (AFM) and tensile tester. It was concluded that PLLA/PTAT blends should be partially miscible for all ranges of compositions. Higher roughness and porosity were observed for the blend containing 50% PTAT, suggesting more phase separation occurred. The DSC analysis showed that the fusion enthalpy and crystallinity (X_c) of the PLLA-rich phase decreased with increasing PTAT content. Solidification process strongly suggested that the crystallization rate was accelerated by blending with 25% PTAT content, which served as the nucleation agent. Furthermore, the crystallization rate coefficient (CRC) depended on the blending miscibility and cooling rate in the non-isothermal crystallization process. Besides, PTAT addition could be proved to enhance the thermal stability and elongation of resulting blend membranes, even superior to those properties of poly(lactic acid-co-glycolic acid) (PLGA).     

Thermally induced phase separation in homogeneous blends of poly(2,6-dimethyl-1,4-phenylene oxide) with poly(o-fluorostyrene-co-p-chlorostyrene) and with poly(o-fluorostyrene-co-o-chlorostyrene)

The phase separation behavior of initially compatible blends of poly(2,6-dimethyl-1,4-phenylene oxide) (PPO) with poly(o-fluorostyrene-co-p-chlorostyrene) [poly(oFS-co-pCIS)] and with poly(o-fluorostyrene-co-o-chlorostyrene) [poly(oFS-co-oCIS)] was studied by DSC. It was found that copolymers of poly(oFS-co-pCIS) containing between 15 and 62 mol % pCIS have shown no phase separation after annealing at temperatures up to 320°C. It was also observed that blends containing this copolymer with 74 mol % pCIS show phase separation at 250°C, which depended on blend composition. Additionally, all PPO/poly(oFS-co-oCIS) blends exhibit phase separation after annealing to a temperature of 230°C. Thermal degradation of the polymer blends was not observed at the temperatures studied.