In-vitro dewetting properties of planned replacement and daily disposable silicone hydrogel contact lenses

AimTo compare the in-vitro videokeratoscopic surface dewetting properties of new-generation silicone hydrogel (SiH) planned replacement contact lenses (CL) with those of daily disposable CLs.MethodA chrome coated cornea model was used for the in-vitro evaluation of surface dewetting. Pre-lens and post-lens film layers were formed by instilling a normal preservative-free normal saline solution (PFNs) (0.9 %) before and after the placement of the CL on the model cornea. The tests were carried out on fanfilcon A, lotrafilcon B, samfilcon A, and senofilcon A lenses, as well as such daily disposable lenses as delefilcon, nesofilcon A and senofilcon one day. Using videokeratoscopic methods, images were obtained at 30-second intervals up to 180 s in the lens and control groups and were analyzed by the ImajeJ® program.ResultsThe mean measured area of the keratoscopic rings was largest in the fanfilcon group (67.56 mm²), followed by 61.53 mm² in the lotrafilcon A group and 64.60 mm² in the samfilcon group, while the smallest area was measured in the senofilcon A group, at 56.90 mm². The area was measured as 64.33, 63.09 and 68.39 mm² for the delefilcon, nesofilcon and Senofilcon one day CLs, respectively. The dewetting patterns and properties differed in the CL groups (p < 0.05), while no significant differences were found between the measured areas of the planned replacement and daily disposable CL groups (p > 0.05).DiscussionVideokeratoscopy using in-vitro cornea models has been identified as a reproducible and reliable method for the analysis of the surface dewetting of CLs. The dewetting characteristics of CL groups have been found to differ from each other, despite all being produced from SiH materials. The surface wetting coating has been shown to affect CL dewetting performance.     

An investigation into disposal and recycling options for daily disposable and monthly replacement soft contact lens modalities

PurposeTo examine the annualised waste and end-of-life disposal options with two representative soft contact lens (CL) modalities.MethodsThe component parts of two representative soft CL modalities were catalogued, separated, weighed and inspected for material identification: somofilcon A soft CLs (clariti elite, CooperVision Inc.) used with multi-purpose solution (MPS) (All in one Light, CooperVision Inc.) and somofilcon A CLs (clariti 1 day, CooperVision Inc). Using a model that assumed compliant wear and care of CLs, the mass of material solid waste generated by CL use over a year was calculated. Disposal options were explored using household and specialist recycling streams in order to develop recommendations for responsible disposal of CL waste.ResultsFull-time daily disposable (DD) CL wear generates 1.06 kg of waste annually compared to 0.83 kg generated by reusable-monthly replacement daily wear (‘reusable’) CLs. Plastic was the dominant material in both modalities. With full-time use of DD CLs, 64% of waste by mass was plastic blister trays. For full-time use of reusable CLs, where figures from lens and MPS packaging are combined, plastics accounted for 67% of waste by mass. MPS bottles alone made up almost half the waste (45%) associated with full-time reusable CL wear.ConclusionFull-time DD wear generates 27% more waste annually than full-time reusable lens wear. Reusable CL wearers can recycle 78% of waste at home. DD lens wearers have access to recycling options that allow them to recycle 100% of CL related waste. Full-time CL lens wear represents just 0.20–0.26% of the 412 kg of household waste generated per person, per year in the United Kingdom. Worn CLs should never be disposed of down the sink or lavatory. CL wearers should be aware of responsible end-of-life recycling and disposal options for all CL waste.     

Rigid gas permeable contact lenses for visual rehabilitation of unilateral aphakic children in China

PurposeTo investigate the effectiveness, safety and tolerance of rigid gas-permeable contact lenses (RGP CLs) in the visual rehabilitation of unilateral aphakic children in China.MethodsRecords of 36 children (36 eyes) with RGP CLs to unilateral aphakia between 2014 and 2018 were evaluated. Each enrolled child underwent vision assessment (visual acuity, fixation, and deviation) at each follow-up visit and their caregivers completed a questionnaire designed to find out the reasons for RGP CLs dropout. The fit characteristics and adverse events were also evaluated.ResultsThe mean age was 7.0 months (interquartile range, 5.0–12.8 months). The final mean logMAR visual acuity (VA) of the treated eyes was 1.2 ± 0.7 for 12 patients who cooperated in visual assessments and 6 out of these subjects had a VA of better than 1.0 logMAR. The proportion of treated eyes which could be recorded the visual results increased significantly after RGP CLs intervention (5.6% vs. 33.3%, P < 0.001). The final VA assessed for the fellow eyes and both eyes were 0.7 ± 0.4 and 0.6 ± 0.3, respectively. Of the 36 patients, 24 had strabismus. There was no severe lens-related adverse event except only one patient had mild conjunctivitis. At the end of the follow-up it was found that 25 eyes are still using RGP CLs (69%). Indications to discontinue contact lens wear included difficult manipulation of RGP CL, loss of motivation, unstable lens, and eye irritation.ConclusionsRGP contact lenses provide an effective and safe alternative method for visual rehabilitation and can be well tolerated in pediatric aphakia.     

The influence of surface treatment on hydrophobicity, protein adsorption and microbial colonisation of silicone hydrogel contact lenses.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the influence of surface treatment of silicone-hydrogel CL on lens hydrophobicity, protein adsorption and microbial colonisation by studying several silicone hydrogel contact lenses (CL) with and without surface treatment. The lenses used in this study were Balafilcon A, Lotrafilcon A, Lotrafilcon B and Galyfilcon A. A conventional hydrogel CL (Etafilcon A) was also tested. METHODS: Hydrophobicity was determined through contact angle measurement using the advancing type technique on air. The type and quantity of proteins adsorbed were assessed through SDS-PAGE and fluorescence spectroscopy, respectively. Microbial colonisation was studied by removing the microbes from the lenses through sonication, and counting the colony-forming units on agar plates. RESULTS: Regarding hydrophobicity, both surface and non-surface-treated silicone hydrogel CL were found to be hydrophobic, and the conventional hydrogel CL was found to be hydrophilic. Concerning protein adsorption, different protein profiles were observed on the several lenses tested. Nevertheless, the presence of proteins with the same molecular weight as lysozyme and lactoferrin was common to all lenses, which is probably related to their abundance in tears. In terms of total protein adsorption, silicone hydrogel CL did not exhibit any differences between themselves. However, the conventional hydrogel Etafilcon A adsorbed a larger amount of proteins. Regarding microbial colonisation, Balafilcon A exhibited the greatest amount of colonising microbes, which can be due to its superior hydrophobicity and higher electron acceptor capacity. CONCLUSION: This study suggests that silicone hydrogel lenses adsorb a lower amount of proteins than the conventional hydrogel lenses and that this phenomenon is independent of the presence of surface treatment. Concerning microbial colonisation, the surface treated Balafilcon A, exhibited a greater propensity, a fact that may compromise the lens wearer's ocular health.     

Corneal surface wettability and tear film stability before and after scleral lens wear

PurposeThe aim of this study was to evaluate the anterior surface of scleral contact lens and ocular surface wettability before and after one-month of scleral lens wear in patients with keratoconus.MethodsForty-nine patients with keratoconus (36.26 ± 9.03 years) were recruited. The sample was divided into two groups: patients with intrastromal corneal ring (KCICRS group) and patients without ICRS (KC group). TFSQ, Schirmer I test, Ocular Surface Disease Index (OSDI questionnaire), tear break-up time (TBUT) and corneal staining were evaluated in two different visits: Baseline (before lens wear) and one-month visit (10 min after lens removal). Visual Analog Scale (VAS questionnaire) was filled in just after inserting the lenses and just before removing them. TFSQ mean and inferior were evaluated over the contact lens surface at the moment of inserting the lens (baseline visit) and after 8 h of lens wear (one-month visit).ResultsAnterior corneal surface TFSQ values increased in all groups after scleral lens wear (p < 0.05). However, there were no statistical differences found at the moment of inserting or after 8 h of lens wear on previous contact lens surface TFSQ (p > 0.05). No changes were found in tear volume for total and in KC and KCICRS groups (p > 0.05). For all groups, there was a statistical decrease of TBUT (p < 0.05). In addition, OSDI score, corneal staining and VAS score improved after scleral lens wear from baseline in total and in both KC and KCICRS groups (p < 0.05).ConclusionThe scleral contact lens surface keeps its wettability after one-month of wear. However, the wettability of the ocular surface is worse after contact lens wearing.     

Efficacy of two silicone-hydrogel contact lenses for bandage use after photorefractive keratectomy

PurposeTo evaluate the efficacy of two silicone hydrogel (SiH) contact lenses, approved for continuous wear for one week, following photorefractive keratectomy (PRK).MethodsForty seven myopic patients (94 eyes) undergone bilateral PRK were enrolled in this prospective, double-masked, comparative study. One eye of each patient was fitted with a Lotrafilcon B lens (Ciba Vision, Duluth, US; 30-day recommended replacement) whereas the fellow eye was fitted with an Asmofilcon A lens (Menicon, Nagoya, Japan; 14-day recommended replacement). Epithelial defect size was assessed using slit lamp biomicroscopy on the day of surgery and at days 1–4 post-operatively. Uncorrected and best-corrected visual acuity and retinal straylight (C-Quant, Oculus Optigerate, Germany) were evaluated pre-operatively and one month post-operatively.ResultsAverage epithelial defect size for Asmofilcon A and Lotrafilcon B was 25.5 ± 11.0 mm² vs. 27.1 ± 9.9 mm² at day 1 (p = 0.007) and 6.3 ± 7.0 mm² vs. 9.2 ± 9.5 mm² at day 2 (p = 0.012) post-operatively. Re-epithelialization at day 3 was completed in 87.2% of the eyes fitted with Asmofilcon A lenses, compared to 74.5% with Lotrafilcon B lenses (p = 0.012). At the 3rd post-operative day 29.8% of re-epithelialized eyes showed irregular suture with Lotrafilcon B, compared to 12.8% eyes with Asmofilcon A lenses (p < 0.001). Finally, no statistically significant differences were found post-operatively between the two lenses retinal straylight (p = 0.98) and best-corrected visual acuity (p = 0.68).ConclusionsSiH lenses can be used as an effective bandage after PRK due to the limited time requested for achieving complete corneal re-epithelialization. Faster and smoother epithelial healing is provided with Asmofilcon A over Lotrafilcon B lenses.     

The impact of patient behaviour and care system compliance on reusable soft contact lens complications

Reusable soft daily wear contact lenses (CLs) remain popular and were fit to just over half of all wearers in the most recent international CL prescribing survey. Unlike daily disposable CLs, reusables require cleaning and disinfecting after every use, along with storage in a CL case. These additional requirements add a number of steps to the daily wear and care routine, increasing the opportunities for CL wearers to exhibit non-compliant behaviour. The impact of non-compliance ranges from poor lens comfort through to potentially sight-threatening infective keratitis. The coronavirus pandemic has refocused the profession on the importance of hand hygiene in particular, and the need for promoting safe CL wear in general. This review summarises typical non-compliant behaviour related to reusable CLs, and examines strategies and opportunities to better support wearers. Patient education has a central role in encouraging compliant behaviour, although patient recall of information is low, and personal belief systems may result in continuation of non-compliant behaviour despite awareness of the risks. CL care solutions are required for the daily disinfection of lenses, however misuse of multipurpose solutions (MPS) and hydrogen peroxide (H₂O₂)-based care systems can challenge their ability to be fully efficacious. Standard efficacy testing is reviewed, with consideration of how well current protocols model real-world use of CL solutions. Although some recommendations are in place for the inclusion of additional variables such as lens cases, CL materials, organic soil and efficacy against Acanthamoeba, opportunity still exists to reevaluate global standards to ensure consistency of testing in all markets. Finally, potential future innovations are discussed which may further support increased safety in reusable lens wear through novel antimicrobial additions to both CL materials and cases.     

Improving your spectacle patients’ in-practice experience with contact lenses during frame selection

PurposeA market research survey was conducted to assess the impact of offering complimentary contact lenses (CLs) to spectacle-only wearing patients during frame selection with regards to their in-office experience, the transaction amount for their eyewear purchase and the likelihood of proceeding with a comprehensive contact lens fitting.MethodsFive optometry offices in the US participated. An initial interviewing phase served as a control during which optometrists treated spectacle-only wearing patients in the usual manner for frame selection. After this, the offices transitioned into a test phase where patients were offered the opportunity to wear CLs while selecting new spectacle frames. Only patients 18 or older who had not expressed an interest in CLs were invited to participate. A brief survey was completed on an iPad following the visit by all patients in both control and test phases.Results410 patients (205 test, 205 control) participated. 63% of the test group elected to wear CLs (40% spherical, 20% toric, 35% multifocal, 5% monovision). Patients wearing CLs spent more on their eyewear purchase ($708 vs $593, p = 0.04), were greater than 2.5X more likely to have received or scheduled a CL fit (p = 0.01), and were greater than 3X more likely to consider scheduling a CL fitting in the future (p = 0.0003). Additionally, 93% reported that they were highly satisfied with the experience and 86% said they would wear CLs to select frames again (86%).ConclusionsOffering CLs to spectacle-only patients positively impacts eyewear selection and purchase and can grow the overall CL business.     

The use of daily disposable lenses in problematic reusable contact lens wearers

PurposeReplacing soft contact lenses (CLs) on a daily basis brings a number of advantages, most notably, reduced exposure to deposits, disinfectants, allergens, and other contaminants. This retrospective study estimated the prevalence of problems in current wearers of reusable soft CLs and tested the effect of refitting “problem” patients with daily disposable (DD) hydrogel lenses.MethodsPrevalence was estimated from 398 current reusable CL wearers for: frequent/constant discomfort or dryness, ≥2 h of uncomfortable wear, ≥grade 2 conjunctival hyperaemia (0–4), or ≥grade 3 corneal staining (0–15). In the second part of the study, 217 reusable CL wearers classified as problem patients were randomly refitted with DD lenses manufactured from one of two materials: etafilcon A (n = 96) or nelfilcon A (n = 121) and reassessed 1 week later.ResultsThirty-nine percent (154/398) had some qualifying criterion: reduced comfortable wearing time (CWT), 20%; dryness, 20%; irritation, 5%; corneal staining, 8%; and hyperaemia, 7%. After refitting with DDs, the prevalence of reduced CWT was decreased from 65% to 51% (P = 0.0039), dryness from 60% to 41% (P < 0.0001) and corneal staining from 28% to 21% (P = 0.04). There was no significant change in the prevalence of irritation, or hyperaemia. Some differences were noted between the two lens materials.ConclusionsA high proportion of reusable soft lens wearers encounter clinically relevant signs or symptoms with their current CLs. This study provides evidence that refitting with DD lenses is a useful strategy for alleviating some of the common problems of CL wear.     

Contact lens prescribing pattern in India—2011

PurposeTo understand the pattern of prescribing contact lenses (CL) among Indian practitioners.MethodsSurvey forms were sent to 257 practitioners across the country to collect information about their last 10 CL fits, location and type of practice, years of experience and educational qualification. A logistic regression analysis was performed to determine any association of various factors to the lens fitting pattern and chi-square test was used to compare proportions. The data were analyzed using SPSS v.16.ResultsCL fitting details from 227 practitioners were acquired representing a total of 2270 fits. The mean age of patients was 26.8 ± 7.4 years and 67% of them were females. Ninety-eight percent of patients wore soft CL comprising 24% toric lenses. Ninety percent patients preferred disposable modality with 65% of these opting for monthly disposable lenses. Twenty-eight percent of the lenses dispensed were silicone hydrogel (SiH) lenses. Optometry practices located in metropolitan cities dispensed significantly higher numbers of disposable (p < 0.001) and SiH lenses (p < 0.001). Logistic regression analysis showed Fellowship of International Association of Contact Lens Educators (FIACLE) (OR: 13.79, 95% CI: 2.61–72.70), post graduate degree (OR: 3.87, 95% CI: 0.87–17.12) and years of experience were directly associated with fitting of advanced CL.ConclusionThe CL prescribing patterns in India elicited from this survey suggest the dominance (90%) of prescribing of disposable soft CL. Higher level of education, greater experience and a FIACLE status were significantly associated with advanced fitting.     

Improved contact lens fitting after corneal cross-linking in eyes with progressive keratoconus

ObjectivesThe study aimed to assess the possible effects of corneal cross-linking (CXL) on contact lens (CL) fitting in patients with progressive keratoconus who initially had CL intolerance.MethodsA retrospective review was performed of the medical records of patients who had stopped CL wear due to discomfort prior to CXL and who were fitted with CLs after CXL. All eyes were evaluated pre- and 1, 6, 12, 24 months postoperatively. Data collected included pre- and post-CXL refraction, corneal topographic data, uncorrected visual acuity, and best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA). CL comfort was evaluated using the Likert scale post-CXL.ResultsA total of 20 eyes from 14 patients were included in the study. Preoperative Kmax values significantly decreased by 2.8 D at 6 months and by 4.1 D at 12 months after CXL (p < 0.001 for both). CLs were prescribed on average 12 ± 2.5 months after CXL. The mean duration of successful CL wear was 10.4 ± 2.8 months during the follow-up period. Subjective CL comfort scores were satisfactory post-CXL.ConclusionCXL not only halts the progression of keratoconus but may also improve CL tolerance by providing a more regular shaped cornea in these patients. Ongoing corneal topographic changes in the late postoperative period after CXL may have a positive effect on CL fitting.     

Computational analysis of retinal image quality with different contact lens designs in keratoconus

PurposeTo determine 1) the relative differences in optical quality of keratoconic eyes fitted with four routinely used CL designs and 2) the Zernike coefficients in the residual wavefront aberration map that may be responsible for differences in the optical quality of keratoconic eyes fitted with these CLs.MethodsWavefront aberrations over a 3-mm pupil diameter were measured without and with Kerasoft IC®, Rose K2®, conventional spherical Rigid Gas Permeable (RGP), and Scleral CLs in 15 mild to moderate keratoconic eyes (20 – 28 years) and under unaided viewing in 10 age-similar non-contact lens wearing controls. The resultant through-focus curves constructed for the logarithm of Neural Sharpness (logNS) Image Quality (IQ) metric were quantified in terms of peak value, best focus, and depth of focus. Sensitivity analyses determined the impact of the residual Zernike coefficients of keratoconic eyes fitted with CLs on the IQ of controls at emmetropic refraction.ResultsThe peak IQ and depth of focus were similar with Rose K2®, conventional RGP, and Scleral CLs (p > 0.05, for all) but significantly better than Kerasoft IC® CLs (p < 0.01 for all). Best focus was similar across all four CLs (p > 0.2 for all). However, the IQ parameters of all the lenses remained significantly poorer than the controls (p < 0.01, for all). The IQ of the controls dropped to keratoconic levels with induced residual lower-order Zernike terms and 3rd-order coma across all lenses in the sensitivity analysis (p < 0.001).ConclusionsIQ of keratoconic eyes remain suboptimal with routinely dispensed CL designs, largely due to residual lower-order aberrations and coma, all relative to the controls. The performance drop appears greater for the Kerasoft IC® CL relative to the other CL designs. These results may provide the optical basis for psychophysical spatial visual performance reported earlier across these four CL designs for keratoconus.     

Quantification of accommodative response and visual performance in non-presbyopes wearing low-add contact lenses

PurposeDigital eye strain encompasses a range of ocular and visual symptoms across all age groups. Recently, symptoms associated with accommodative or binocular vision stress have become a major problem, especially in young individuals. The purpose of this prospective, single-blinded study was to objectively quantify the accommodative response and visual performance of low-add soft contact lenses (CLs) in young non-presbyopic individuals.MethodsA daily disposable low-add bifocal design lens (low-add CL) was tested. It employs a centre-distance optical zone and peripheral zone with the added power of +0.50 D to support near vision. Sixteen subjects aged 20–39 years were enrolled in the study. Refractive state and accommodation were measured using an open-field autorefractor with three target vergences, namely, −0.20 D, −2.5 D, and −4.0 D. Binocular visual acuity at high (100%) and low (40%, 20%) contrast and reading ability were assessed. Monofocal soft CLs were used as controls.ResultsAccommodative response with low-add CLs was significantly smaller than those with two monofocal CL wearing conditions, i.e., at 40 cm (2.5 D of stimulus) and 25 cm (4.0 D of stimulus) (all p < 0.05). The 20% contrast visual acuity at distance was significantly better with low-add CLs and second-time monofocal CLs compared to first-time monofocal CLs (all p < 0.05). The reading ability was not significantly different.ConclusionsQuantification of accommodative response and visual performance demonstrated that using low-add CLs alleviated the accommodation under the near-vision condition, without sacrificing distance vision, in non-presbyopes.     

UV–vis light transmittance through tinted contact lenses and the effect of color on values

PurposeTo assess the transmittance, in the 200–700 nm electromagnetic radiation spectrum, by popularly used tinted soft contact lenses (CLs).MethodThe spectra transmittances of ultraviolet (UV)-blocking (I Day Acuvue Define, Freshlook ONE DAY) and non-UV-blocking (Durasoft 3, Tutti, and NeoCosmo) tinted soft CLs were tested. The transmittance of each lens, including nine different colors of Freshlook CL was recorded on spectrophotometer, and the data used to also calculate a UV protection factor (PF) for each lens brand tested, with a higher value indicating a higher level of protection.ResultsThe UV-blocking CLs significantly reduced UVC, UVB & UVA transmission and thereby meet the American National Standards Institution standard for class 2 UV blockers: a maximum of 30% transmittance of UVA and 5% transmittance of UVB wavelengths. In contrast, the Durasoft 3, Tutti, and NeoCosmo CLs demonstrated negligible UV-blockage. The Acuvue Define CL offered the greatest protection from UVC (PF = 69) and UVB (PF = 55), but with only 35% luminous transmittance, while the Freshlook CL (especially gemstone green) offered the best protection from UVA (PF = 24) and showed about 55% translucency. Overall, the UV-blocking CLs performed equally well across the UV spectrum. Different colors of Freshlook CL transmitted statistically and clinically significantly different amounts of visible light but similar amounts of UVR.ConclusionFreshlook and Acuvue Define CLs which are designated as UV-blockers significantly reduced UVR transmission to safe levels whereas Tutti, NeoCosmo and Durasoft 3 did not. Transmission within the Freshlook CL family was more dependent on color in the visible light spectrum, but not in the UV-spectrum, where the gemstone green performing best among the tested colors.     

Long-term effect of corneoscleral contact lenses on refractory ocular surface diseases

PurposeTo report the therapeutic effect of corneoscleral contact lenses (CLs) with a diameter of 14.0 mm on the refractory ocular surface diseases.MethodsMedical records of 13 eyes (of nine patients) attempted for fitting with corneoscleral CLs for the management of the severe refractory ocular surface diseases were retrospectively reviewed including Stevens-Johnson syndrome (SJS; eight eyes) and chronic ocular graft-versus-host disease (GVHD; five eyes). Lenses were fitted to improve refractory punctate epithelial erosions (PEE, ten eyes) and persistent epithelial defect (PED, three eyes with SJS) despite the proper medical management. Short-term (1 month) and long-term (12 months) changes in the best corrected visual acuity (BCVA), corneal fluorescein staining (CFS) score, mean wearing time, and National Eye Institute’s Visual Function Questionnaire-25 (VFQ-25) were evaluated.ResultsOf the 13 eyes, ten eyes were successfully fitted with the corneoscleral CLs. The fitting was failed in three eyes due to small palpebral fissure and shortened fornices (two eyes) and handling difficulty (one eye). At one-month follow-up after successful fitting in ten eyes, mean wearing time was 12.6 h (6.5–17, all day long) and BCVA improved from 0.56 ± 0.59 to 0.27 ± 0.46 in logMAR (P = .018). For the eight well-fitted eyes with refractory PEE, CFS score improved from 7.38±2.20 to 5.13±2.48 (P = .024). PED improved in all two eyes which were successfully fitted with corneoscleral CLs (Of the three eyes with PED, one eye failed fitting). At 12-month follow-up, mean wearing time was 11.4 h and the improved BCVA and CFS score were maintained. Furthermore, no adverse events attributable to corneoscleral CLs use occurred.ConclusionThe corneoscleral CLs with a diameter of 14.0 mm were successfully fitted in ten out of 13 eyes with severe refractory ocular surface diseases and demonstrated therapeutic benefits in the well-fitted eyes. The corneoscleral CL can be an option in the management of severe refractory ocular surface diseases.     

Effect of material and care system combination on subclinical inflammation of the ocular surface in soft contact lens wear

PurposeTo investigate the ocular subclinical inflammatory response in two soft contact lens materials when used in combination with two different care systems (‘solutions’).MethodsFifteen established soft contact lens wearers wore each of two lenses: Acuvue® 2 (CH) and Acuvue® Oasys® (SiH) or no lenses in random sequence for one week. Two care systems were used: a peroxide system: Oxysept 1 Step® (P) for the right lens and Opti-Free® Replenish® (MPS) for the left lens. After one week of lens/no lens wear, in vivo confocal microscopy (IVCM) of corneal and conjunctival regions was carried out. Density of presumed dendritic cells (DC) and ‘white spots’ (WS) were quantified. Impression cytology of the bulbar and upper eyelid margin conjunctivae was carried out and samples were analysed for CD45+, CD3+ and CD11c+ cells.ResultsThe SiH + MPS combination showed a greater inflammatory response compared to SiH + P in seven out of 12 parameters investigated (p < 0.05). The remaining five were not statistically different between the two solutions. The converse was found for the CH lens, with four of the 12 parameters showing a greater response with the P solution compared to the MPS (p < 0.05).ConclusionThis study suggests that the SiH lens investigated demonstrated an upregulated response when used with a MPS compared to a P solution whereas the converse is true for the CH lens which showed a reduced response when used with a MPS compared to a P solution. This finding aids in the understanding of the biological underpinnings of manifest corneal inflammatory events during contact lens wear.     

Exploring non-adherence to contact lens wear schedule: Subjective assessments and patient related factors in children wearing single vision and myopia control contact lenses

PurposeTo determine factors associated with non-adherence to contact lens wear schedule involving single vision and myopia control contact lenses in children.MethodsData from 379 children enrolled in a prospective, double masked, randomized clinical trial, aged 8–13 years, cycloplegic spherical equivalent of -0.75 to -3.50D and wearing either: single vision silicone hydrogel (SiH) CL (control lens); two anti-myopia SiH CL that incorporated relative plus in the central and periphery in a stepped manner (test lens I and II); and two extended depth of focus hydrogel CL (test lens III and IV) was considered. A questionnaire was administered to the participants at every scheduled visit and gathered information on days of wear/week and subjective assessments of ocular comfort and visual quality on an analog scale of 1–10.Participants were categorized as “Adherent” when lens wear was ≥ 6 days/week or “Non-adherent” when lens wear ≤ 5 days/week. Categorized adherence data was summarized as a percentage across visits for each CL type. Differences between the two groups were analyzed using linear mixed model.ResultsFor the control lens, 79.6 % participants were adherent as compared to 63.7%–74.6% with test lenses (p=0.026). Non-adherence was greater in those that discontinued (p<0.001). Subjective ratings of visual quality for static and dynamic tasks were lower with non-adherent wearers and more variable between visits. Ocular comfort was also poorer in non-adherent wearers irrespective of lens material or lens design. Male gender, lower baseline myopia, lower high contrast visual acuity and esophoria were associated with a higher risk of non-adherence.ConclusionsThe study identified a wide range of factors associated with non-adherence to lens wear schedule. Paying specific attention to these factors when evaluating patients for CL wear and taking steps to ensure satisfaction in lens wear may promote longer term continuation of wear.     

Presbyopia correction with multifocal contact lenses: Evaluation of silent reading performance using eye movements analysis

PurposeMany activities of daily living rely on reading, thus is not surprising that complaints from presbyopes originate in reading difficulties rather in visual acuity. Here, the effectiveness of presbyopia correction with multifocal contact lenses (CLs) is evaluated using an eye-fixation based method of silent reading performance.ΜethodsVisual performance of thirty presbyopic volunteers (age: 50 ± 5 yrs) was assessed monocularly and binocularly following 15 days of wear of monthly disposable CLs (AIR OPTIX™ plus HydraGlyde™, Alcon Laboratories) with: (a) single vision (SV) lenses – uncorrected for near (b) aspheric multifocal (MF) CLs. LogMAR acuity was measured with ETDRS charts. Reading performance was evaluated using standard IReST paragraphs displayed on a screen (0.4 logMAR print size at 40 cm distance). Eye movements were monitored with an infrared eyetracker (Eye-Link II, SR Research Ltd). Data analysis included computation of reading speed, fixation duration, fixations per word and percentage of regressions.ResultsAverage reading speed was 250 ± 68 and 235 ± 70 wpm, binocularly and monocularly, with SV CLs, improving statistically significantly to 280 ± 67 (p = 0.002) and 260 ± 59 wpm (p = 0.01), respectively, with MF CLs. Moreover, fixation duration, fixations per word and ex-Gaussian parameter of fixation duration, μ, showed a statistically significant improvement when reading with MF CLs, with fixation duration exhibiting the stronger correlation (r = 0.79, p < 0.001) with improvement in reading speed. The correlation between improvement in VA and reading speed was moderate (r = 0.46, p = 0.016), as was the correlation between VA and any eye fixation parameter.ConclusionAverage silent reading speed in a presbyopic population was found improved with MF compared to SV CL correction and was faster with binocular compared to monocular viewing: this was mainly due to the faster average fixation duration and the lower number of fixations. Evaluating reading performance using eye fixation analysis could offer a reliable outcome of functional vision in presbyopia correction.