Miscibility and crystallization in crystalline/crystalline blends of poly(butylene succinate)/poly(ethylene oxide)

Miscibility and crystallization behavior have been investigated in blends of poly(butylene succinate) (PBSU) and poly(ethylene oxide) (PEO), both semicrystalline polymers, by differential scanning calorimetry and optical microscopy. Experimental results indicate that PBSU is miscible with PEO as shown by the existence of single composition dependent glass transition temperature over the entire composition range. In addition, the polymer-polymer interaction parameter, obtained from the melting depression of the high-T_m component PBSU using the Flory-Huggins equation, is composition dependent, and its value is always negative. This indicates that PBSU/PEO blends are thermodynamically miscible in the melt. The morphological study of the isothermal crystallization at 95 °C (where only PBSU crystallized) showed the similar crystallization behavior as in amorphous/crystalline blends. Much more attention has been paid to the crystallization and morphology of the low-T_m component PEO, which was studied through both one-step and two-step crystallization. It was found that the crystallization of PEO was affected clearly by the presence of the crystals of PBSU formed through different crystallization processes. The two components crystallized sequentially not simultaneously when the blends were quenched from the melt directly to 50 °C (one-step crystallization), and the PEO spherulites crystallized within the matrix of the crystals of the preexisted PBSU phase. Crystallization at 95 °C followed by quenching to 50 °C (two-step crystallization) also showed the similar crystallization behavior as in one-step crystallization. However, the radial growth rate of the PEO spherulites was reduced significantly in two-step crystallization than in one-step crystallization.     

Crystallization kinetics and morphology of poly(butylene succinate)/poly(vinyl phenol) blend

Biodegradable crystalline poly(butylene succinate) (PBSU) can form miscible polymer blends with amorphous poly(vinyl phenol) (PVPh). The isothermal crystallization kinetics and morphology of neat and blended PBSU with PVPh were studied by differential scanning calorimetry (DSC), optical microscopy (OM), wide angle X-ray diffraction (WAXD), and small angle X-ray scattering (SAXS) in this work. The overall isothermal crystallization kinetics of neat and blended PBSU was studied with DSC in the crystallization temperature range of 80-88 °C and analyzed by applying the Avrami equation. It was found that blending with PVPh did not change the crystallization mechanism of PBSU, but reduced the crystallization rate compared with that of neat PBSU at the same crystallization temperature. The crystallization rate decreased with increasing crystallization temperature, while the crystallization mechanism did not change for both neat and blended PBSU irrespective of the crystallization temperature. The spherulitic morphology and growth were observed with hot stage OM in a wide crystallization temperature range of 75-100 °C. The spherulitic morphology of PBSU was influenced apparently by the crystallization temperature and the addition of PVPh. The linear spherulitic growth rate was measured and analyzed by the secondary nucleation theory. Through the Lauritzen-Hoffman equation, some parameters of neat and blended PBSU were derived and compared with each other including the nucleation parameter (K_g), the lateral surface free energy (σ), the end-surface free energy (σ_e), and the work of chain folding (q). Blending with PVPh decreased all the aforementioned parameters compared with those of neat PBSU; however, the decrease extent was limited. WAXD result showed that the crystal structure of PBSU was not modified after blending with PVPh. SAXS result showed that the long period of blended PBSU increased, possibly indicating that the amorphous PVPh might reside mainly in the interlamellar region of PBSU.     

Miscibility and crystallization of biodegradable poly(butylene succinate-co-butylene adipate)/poly(vinyl phenol) blends

Miscibility, crystallization kinetics, crystal structure, and microstructure of biodegradable poly(butylene succinate-co-butylene adipate) (PBSA)/poly(vinyl phenol) (PVPh) blends were studied by differential scanning calorimetry, optical microscopy, wide angle X-ray diffraction, and small angle X-ray scattering in detail in this work. PBSA and PVPh are miscible as evidenced by the single composition dependent glass transition temperature and the negative polymer-polymer interaction parameter. Isothermal crystallization kinetics of PBSA/PVPh blends was investigated and analyzed by the Avrami equation. The overall crystallization rates of PBSA decrease with increasing crystallization temperature and the PVPh content in the PBSA/PVPh blends; however, the crystallization mechanism of PBSA does not change in the blends. Furthermore, blending with PVPh does not modify the crystal structure of PBSA. The microstructural parameters, including the long period, thickness of crystalline phase and thickness of amorphous phase, all become larger with increasing the PVPh content, indicating that PVPh mainly resides in the interlamellar region of PBSA spherulites in the blends.     

Miscibility and crystallization of biodegradable poly(3‐hydroxybutyrate‐co‐3‐hydroxyhexanoate)/poly(vinyl phenol) blends

Miscibility and crystallization of biodegradable poly (3‐hydroxybutyrate‐co‐3‐hydroxyhexanoate) (PHBHHx)/poly(vinyl phenol) (PVPh) blends were investigated in this work. PHBHHx is miscible with PVPh over the whole composition range as evidenced by the single composition dependent glass transition temperature and the depression of equilibrium melting point of PHBHHx in the blends. The overall crystallization rates decrease with increasing crystallization temperature for both neat PHBHHx and its blends with PVPh; moreover, the overall crystallization rates are slower in the PHBHHx/PVPh blends than in neat PHBHHx at the same crystallization temperature. Blending with PVPh may change the crystallization mechanism of PHBHHx in the blends compared with that of neat PHBHHx. Both neat PHBHHx and the PHBHHx/PVPh blends exhibit a crystallization regime II to III transition. The crystal structure of PHBHHx is not modified in the PHBHHx/PVPh blends; however, the values of crystal layer thickness, amorphous layer thickness, and long period all become larger with increasing PVPh content in the blends. POLYM. ENG. SCI., 2012. © 2011 Society of Plastics Engineers     

Miscibility and crystallization behaviour of biodegradable blends of two aliphatic polyesters. Poly(3-hydroxybutyrate-co-hydroxyvalerate) and poly(butylene succinate) blends

Blends of poly(3-hydroxybutyrate-co-hydroxyvalerate) (PHBV) and poly(butylene succinate) (PBSU), both biodegradable semicrystalline polyesters, were prepared with the ratio of PHBV/PBSU ranging from 80/20 to 20/80 by co-dissolving the two polyesters in chloroform and casting the mixture. Differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) and optical microscopy (OM) were used to study the miscibility and crystallization behaviour of PHBV/PBSU blends. Experimental results indicate that PHBV is immiscible with PBSU as shown by the almost unchanged glass transition temperature and the biphasic melt. Crystallization of PHBV/PBSU blends was studied by DSC using two-step crystallization and analyzed by the Avrami equation. The crystallization rate of PHBV decreases with the increase of PBSU in the blends while the crystallization mechanism does not change. In the case of the isothermal crystallization of PBSU, the crystallization mechanism does not change. The crystallization rate of PBSU in the blends is lower than that of neat PBSU; however, the change in the crystallization rate of PBSU was not so big in the blends. The different content of the PHBV in the blends does not make a significant difference in the crystallization rate of PBSU.     

Miscibility and crystallization of poly(ethylene succinate)/poly(vinyl phenol) blends

Miscibility of biodegradable poly(ethylene succinate) (PES)/poly(vinyl phenol) (PVPh) blends has been studied by differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) in this work. PES is found to be miscible with PVPh as shown by the existence of single composition dependent glass transition temperature over the entire composition range. Spherulitic morphology and the growth rates of neat and blended PES were investigated by optical microscopy (OM). Both neat and blended PES show a maximum growth rate value in the crystallization temperature range of 45-65 °C, with the growth rate of neat PES being higher than that of blended PES at the same crystallization temperature. The overall crystallization kinetics of neat and blended PES was also studied by DSC and analyzed by the Avrami equation at 60 and 65 °C. The crystallization rate decreases with increasing the temperature for both neat and blended PES. The crystallization rate of blended PES is lower than that of neat PES at the same crystallization temperature. However, the Avrami exponent n is almost the same despite the blend composition and crystallization temperature, indicating that the addition of PVPh does not change the crystallization mechanism of PES but only lowers the crystallization rate.     

Melting behaviour of poly(butylene succinate) in miscible blends with poly(ethylene oxide)

The melting behavior of poly(butylene succinate) (PBSU) in miscible blends with poly(ethylene oxide) (PEO), which is a newly found polymer blends of two crystalline polymers by our group, has been investigated by conventional differential scanning calorimetry (DSC). It was found that PBSU showed double melting behavior after isothermal crystallization from the melt under certain crystallization conditions, which was explained by the model of melting, recrystallization and remelting. The influence of the blend composition, crystallization temperature and scanning rate on the melting behavior of PBSU has been studied extensively. With increasing any of the PEO composition, crystallization temperature and scanning rate, the recrystallization of PBSU was inhibited. Furthermore, temperature modulated differential scanning calorimetry (TMDSC) was also employed in this work to investigate the melting behavior of PBSU in PBSU/PEO blends due to its advantage in the separation of exotherms (including crystallization and recrystallization) from reversible meltings (including the melting of the crystals originally existed prior to the DSC scan and the melting of the crystals formed through the recrystallization during the DSC scan). The TMDSC experiments gave a direct evidence of this melting, recrystallization and remelting model to explain the multiple melting behavior of PBSU in PBSU/PEO blends.     

Poly(hydroxybutyrate)/poly(butylene succinate) blends: miscibility and nonisothermal crystallization

Four blends of poly(hydroxybutyrate) (PHB) and poly(butylene succinate) (PBSU), both biodegradable semicrystalline polyesters, were prepared with the ratio of PHB/PBSU ranging from 80/20 to 20/80 by co-dissolving the two polyesters in N,N-dimethylformamide and casting the mixture. Differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) and optical microscopy (OM) were used to probe the miscibility of PHB/PBSU blends. Experimental results indicated that PHB showed some limited miscibility with PBSU for PHB/PBSU 20/80 blend as evidenced by the small change in the glass transition temperature and the depression of the equilibrium melting point temperature of the high melting point component PHB. However, PHB showed immiscibility with PBSU for the other three blends as shown by the existence of unchanged composition independent glass transition temperature and the biphasic melt. Nonisothermal crystallization of PHB/PBSU blends was investigated by DSC using various cooling rates from 2.5 to 10 °C/min. During the nonisothermal crystallization, despite the cooling rates used two crystallization peak temperatures were found for PHB/PBSU 40/60 and 60/40 blends, corresponding to the crystallization of PHB and PBSU, respectively, whereas only one crystallization peak temperature was observed for PHB/PBSU 80/20 and 20/80 blends. However, it was found that after the nonisothermal crystallization the crystals of PHB and PBSU actually co-existed in PHB/PBSU 80/20 and 20/80 blends from the two melting endotherms observed in the subsequent DSC melting traces, corresponding to the melting of PHB and PBSU crystals, respectively. The subsequent melting behavior was also studied after the nonisothermal crystallization. In some cases, double melting behavior was found for both PHB and PBSU, which was influenced by the cooling rates used and the blend composition.     

Nonisothermal crystallization kinetics of biodegradable poly(butylene succinate)/poly(vinyl phenol) blend

Nonisothermal melt crystallization kinetics of biodegradable PBSU/PVPh blend was investigated with differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) from the viewpoint of practical application. PBSU/PVPh blends were cooled from the melt at various cooling rates ranging from 2.5 to 40°C/min. The crystallization peak temperature decreased with increasing the cooling rate for both neat and blended PBSU. Furthermore, the crystallization peak temperature of PBSU in the blend was lower than that of neat PBSU at a given cooling rate. Two methods, namely the Avrami equation and the Tobin method, were used to describe the nonisothermal crystallization of PBSU/PVPh blend. It was found that the Avrami equation was more suitable to predict the nonisothermal crystallization of PBSU/PVPh blend than the Tobin method. The effects of cooling rate and blend composition on the crystallization behavior of PBSU were studied in detail. It was found that the crystallization rate decreased with decreasing the cooling rate for both neat and blended PBSU. However, the crystallization of PBSU blended with PVPh was retarded compared with that of neat PBSU at the same cooling rate. © 2007 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 104: 972–978, 2007     

Miscible blends of poly(4‐vinyl phenol)/poly (trimethylene terephthalate)

A new miscible blend of all compositions comprising poly(4‐vinyl phenol) (PVPh) and poly(trimethylene terephthalate) (PTT) was discovered and reported. The blends exhibit a single composition‐dependent glass transition and homogeneous phase morphology, with no lower critical solution temperature (LCST) behavior upon heating to high temperatures. Interactions and spherulite growth kinetics in the blends were also investigated. The Flory–Huggins interaction parameter (χ₁₂) and interaction energy density (B) obtained from analysis of melting point depression are negative (χ₁₂ = ?0.74 and B = ?32.49 J cm^?3), proving that the PVPh/PTT blends are miscible over a wide temperature range from ambient up to high temperatures in the melt state. FTIR studies showed evidence of hydrogen‐bonding interactions between the two polymers. The miscibility of PVPh with PTT also resulted in a reduction in spherulite growth rate of PTT in the miscible blend. The Lauritzen–Hoffman model was used to analyze the spherulite growth kinetics, which showed a lower fold‐surface free energy (σ_e) of the blends than that of the neat PTT. The decrease in the fold‐surface free energy has been attributed to disruption of the PTT lamellae exerted by PVPh in an intimately interacted miscible state. Copyright © 2004 Society of Chemical Industry     

Effect of thermal treatments on the miscibility of poly(vinyl cinnamate) binary blends

Poly(vinyl cinnamate) (PVCN) could undergo thermal or photo crosslinking. PVCN was previously found to be miscible with poly(vinyl phenol) (PVPh) [also named poly(hydroxystyrene)]. In this article, the miscibility between PVCN with or without thermal crosslinking and poly(styrene‐co‐hydrostyrene) (designated as MPS) was investigated. PVCN was determined to be miscible with MPS with 15% of hydroxystyrene (MPS‐15) at two compositions but partially miscible or immiscible at PVCN/MPS‐15(50/50) composition. For MPS with 5% of hydroxystyrene (MPS‐5), two T_g values were detected indicating mostly immiscibility. However, PVCN after thermal crosslinking was determined to be miscible with both MPS‐5 and MPS‐15. Immiscibility was found between thermally crosslinked PVCN and PVPh different from miscibility in the original PVCN/PVPh blends. © 2008 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci, 2008     

Effect of the tacticity of poly(methyl methacrylate) on the phase diagram of its ternary blends

Previously, isotactic and atactic poly(methyl methacrylates) (PMMAs) were found to be miscible with poly(vinyl phenol) (PVPh) and poly(hydroxy ether of bisphenol‐A) (phenoxy) because all the prepared films were transparent and showed composition‐dependent glass transition temperatures (T_g's). However, syndiotactic PMMA was immiscible with PVPh because most of the cast films had two T_g's. On the contrary, syndiotactic PMMA was still miscible with phenoxy. According to our preliminary results, PVPh and phenoxy are not miscible. Also to our knowledge, nobody has reported any results concerning the effect of the tacticity of PMMA on its ternary blend containing PVPh and phenoxy. The miscibility of a ternary blend consisting of PVPh, phenoxy, and tactic PMMA was thus investigated and reported in this article. Calorimetry was used as the principal tool to study miscibility. An approximate phase diagram of the ternary blends containing different tactic PMMA was established, probably for the first time, based on differential scanning calorimetry data. Immiscibility was found in most of the studied ternaries but a slight difference due to the effect of tacticity of PMMA was definitely observed. © 2002 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 86: 2720–2726, 2002     

Binary and ternary polymer blends containing poly(vinylidene chloride‐co‐acrylonitrile)

Poly(vinylidene chloride‐co‐acrylonitrile) (Saran F), poly(hydroxy ether of bisphenol A) (phenoxy), poly(styrene‐co‐acrylonitrile) (PSAN), and poly(vinyl phenol) (PVPh) all have the same characteristic: miscibility with atactic poly(methyl methacrylate) (aPMMA). However, the miscibility of Saran F with the other polymer (phenoxy, PSAN, or PVPh) is not guaranteed and was thus investigated. Saran F was found to be miscible only with PSAN but not miscible with phenoxy and PVPh. Because Saran F and PVPh are not miscible, although they are both miscible with aPMMA, aPMMA can thus be used as a potential cosolvent to homogenize PVPh/Saran F. The second part of this report focused on the miscibility of a ternary blend consisting of Saran F, PVPh, and aPMMA to investigate the cosolvent effect of aPMMA. Factors affecting the miscibility were studied. The established phase diagram indicated that the ternary blends with high PVPh/Saran F weight ratio were found to be mostly immiscible. © 2004 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 91: 3068–3073, 2004     

Miscibility enhancement on the immiscible poly (vinyl pyrrolidone) and poly (ethyl methacrylate) with poly (vinyl phenol)

The miscibility behavior of ternary blends of poly (vinyl phenol) (PVPh)/poly (vinyl pyrrolidone) (PVP)/poly (ethyl methacrylate) (PEMA) was investigated mainly with calorimetry. PVPh is miscible with both PVP and PEMA on the basis of the single T_g observed over the entire composition range. FTIR was used to study the hydrogen bonding interaction between the hydroxyl group of PVPh and the carbonyl group of PVP and PEMA at various compositions. Furthermore, the addition of PVPh is able to enhance the miscibility of the immiscible PVP/PEMA and eventually transforms it into a miscible blend, especially when the ratio between PVP/PEMA is 3:1, probably because of favorable physical interaction. © 2006 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 100: 1205–1213, 2006     

Miscibility and morphology in crystalline/amorphous blends of poly(caprolactone)/poly(4-vinylphenol) as studied by DSC, FTIR, and C solid state NMR

The miscibility and morphology of poly(caprolactone) (PCL) and poly (4-vinylphenol) (PVPh) blends were investigated by using differential scanning calorimetry (DSC), Fourier transform infrared (FTIR) spectroscopy and ¹³C solid state nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectroscopy. The DSC results indicate that PCL is miscible with PVPh. FTIR studies reveal that hydrogen bonding exists between the hydroxyl groups of PVPh and the carbonyl groups of PCL. ¹³C cross polarization (CP)/magic angle spinning (MAS)/dipolar decoupling (DD) spectra of the blends show a 1 ppm downfield shifting of ¹³C resonance of PVPh hydroxyl-substituted carbons and PCL carbonyl carbons with increasing PCL content. Both FTIR and NMR give evidence of inter-molecular hydrogen bonding within the blends. The proton spin-lattice relaxation in the laboratory frame, T₁(H), and in the rotating frame, T_1ρ(H), were studied as a function of the blend composition. The T₁(H) results are in good agreement with thermal analysis; i.e. the blends are completely homogeneous on the scale of 50-80 nm. The T_1ρ(H) results indicate that PCL in the blends has both crystalline and amorphous phases. The amorphous PCL phase is miscible with PVPh, but the PCL crystal domain size is probably larger than the spin-diffusion path length within the T_1ρ(H) time-frame, i.e. larger than 2-4 nm. The mobility differences between the crystalline and amorphous phases of PCL are clearly visible from the T_1ρ(H) data.     

Miscibility and crystallization behavior of biodegradable blends of two aliphatic polyesters. Poly(butylene succinate) and Poly(ε-caprolactone)

Poly(butylene succinate) (PBSU) and poly(ε-caprolactone) (PCL) blends, both biodegradable chemosynthetic semicrystalline polyesters, were prepared with the ratio of PBSU/PCL ranging from 80/20 to 20/80 by co-dissolving the two polyesters in chloroform and casting the mixture. The miscibility and crystallization behavior of PBSU/PCL blends were investigated by differential scanning calorimetry and optical microscopy. Experimental results indicated that PBSU was immiscible with PCL as evidenced by the composition independent glass transition temperature and the biphasic melt. However, during the crystallization from the melt at a given cooling rate, the crystallization peak temperature of PBSU in the blends decreased slightly with the increase of PCL, while that of PCL in the blends first increased and then decreased with the increase of PBSU. Moreover, both the crystallization peak temperature of PBSU and PCL shifted to the low temperature range with the increase of the cooling rate for a given blend composition. Double melting peaks or one main melting peak with a shoulder were found for both PBSU and PCL after the complete crystallization cooled from the melt, and were ascribed to the melting-recrystallization mechanism. It was found that the subsequent melting behavior of PBSU/PCL blends was influenced apparently by the blend composition and the cooling rate used.     

Miscibility and phase behavior of poly(D,L-lactide)/poly(p-vinylphenol) blends

The miscibility of poly(D ,L -lactide) (PDLLA) and poly(p-vinylphenol) (PVPh) blends has been studied by differential scanning calorimetry and Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR). Phase separation was observed in blends over a wide composition range. A PDLLA-rich phase was found to coexist with an almost pure PVPh phase. The quenched blend samples showed two glass transitions (T_gs), except for a blend with a low PVPh content. However, the T_g value of the PDLLA-rich phase showed a gradual increase with increasing PVPh content. No evidence of interassociation (hydrogen bond formation) between PDLLA and PVPh was found by FTIR. The phase behavior of the blends was simulated using an association model. The results suggested that the equilibrium constant of interassociation between PDLLA and PVPh was small. The phase compositions of the two separated phases were calculated using Fox, Gordon-Taylor, and Couchman equations. The amount of PVPh in the PDLLA-rich phase increased with increasing PVPh content in the blend. © 1998 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 70: 811–816, 1998     

Influence of tacticity of poly(methyl methacrylate) on the compatibility with poly(vinyl phenol)

Isotactic, atactic, and syndiotactic poly(methyl methacrylate) (PMMA) were mixed with poly(vinyl phenol) (PVPh) separately in tetrahydrofuran to make three polymer blend systems. Differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) and Fourier transform infrared (FTIR) spectroscopy were used to study the miscibility of these blends. Isotactic PMMA was found to be more miscible with PVPh than atactic or syndiotactic PMMA. © 1997 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 66: 1773–1780, 1997     

Miscible blends containing bacterial poly(3‐hydroxyvalerate) and poly(p‐vinyl phenol)

The miscibility of poly(3‐hydroxyvalerate) (PHV)/poly(p‐vinyl phenol) (PVPh) blends has been studied by differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) and Fourier transform infrared (FTIR) spectroscopy. The blends are miscible as shown by the existence of a single glass transition temperature (T_g) and a depression of the equilibrium melting temperature of PHV in each blend. The interaction parameter was found to be −1.2 based on the analysis of melting point depression data using the Nishi–Wang equation. Hydrogen‐bonding interactions exist between the carbonyl groups of PHV and the hydroxyl groups of PVPh as evidenced by FTIR spectra. The crystallization of PHV is significantly hindered by the addition of PVPh. The addition of 50 wt % PVPh can totally prevent PHV from cold crystallization. © 1999 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 74: 383–388, 1999     

Reexamination of the miscibility of stereoregular poly(methyl methacrylate) with poly(vinyl phenol)

Previously, isotactic, atactic, and syndiotactic poly(methyl methacrylates) (PMMAs) (designated as iPMMA, aPMMA, and sPMMA) were mixed with poly(vinyl phenol) (PVPh) separately in tetrahydrofuran (THF) to make three polymer blend systems. According to calorimetry data, iPMMA was found to be miscible with PVPh; however, partial miscibility or immiscibility was found between aPMMA (or sPMMA) and PVPh. According to the article by C. J. T. Landry and D. M. Teegarden, Macromolecules, 1991, 24, 4310, THF is the reason for causing aPMMA and PVPh to phase separate, but 2‐butanone instead produces miscible blends. Therefore, in this article these three polymer systems were investigated again using 2‐butanone as solvent. Films were prepared under specific conditions to minimize the effect of aggregation in PMMA. The formation of hydrogen bonding between PMMA and PVPh and the attendant changes in the aggregation of PMMA segments were determined in the solid states by means of FTIR. Based on the results of calorimetry, iPMMA and aPMMA were found to be miscible with PVPh. For iPMMA/PVPh blends, different degrees of hydrogen bonding were observed based on DSC data and FTIR spectra when compared to previous study. An elevation of the glass transition temperatures (T_gs) of aPMMA/PVPh blends above weight average was detected and the T_g values were fitted well by the Kwei equation. But partial miscibility was still found between sPMMA and PVPh on account of the observation of two T_gs in most compositions. © 2002 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 83: 1425–1431, 2002