Ammonia volatilization from drill sown rice bays

Ammonia volatilization losses and other N transformations were studied in drill sown rice bays fertilized with urea at various times between permanent flooding (PF) and panicle initiation (PI). Ammonia loss was measured directly with flow chambers and indirectly through application of Freney et al.'s (1985) model. Both techniques indicated that ammonia volatilization was negligible from fields fertilized immediately before PF. Applying 100 kg urea-N ha^–1 to floodwater one day after flooding significantly increased floodwater ammoniacal-N and urea-N content, however the concentrations fell rapidly over the following five days. Fertilizer-N dissolved in the floodwater was in the urea rather than the ammoniacal-N form, indicating slow hydrolysis until it moved into the soil. Floodwater on plots receiving urea one day after PF frequently had more than double the NO₃-N concentration of plots fertilized before flooding.Applying up to 140 kg urea-N ha^–1 at PI increased floodwater ammoniacal-N concentrations from almost zero to over 27 g m^–3, but three days after fertilization there was less than 3 g m^–3 present. Fertilization also increased NH₄-N concentration in the top 40 mm of soil. Higher ammoniacal-N concentration at PI suggests higher urease activity. Floodwater pH at PI was low, with a mean daily maximum of 7.8 and this reduced ammonia loss to less than 1% of the applied N.The results indicate that volatilization from fields fertilized prior to PF is minimal because of the low floodwater pH and ammoniacal-N concentration, while low floodwater pH restricts volatilization from fields topdressed at PI.     

Determination of dinitrogen emission and retention in floodwater and porewater of a lowland rice field fertilized with15N-urea

This paper reports a study on the distribution of dinitrogen between the atmosphere, floodwater and porewater of the soil in a flooded rice field after addition of¹⁵N-labelled urea into the floodwater.Microplots (0.086 m²) were established in a rice field near Griffith, N.S.W., and labelled urea (80 kg N ha^–1 containing 79.25 atoms %¹⁵N) was added to the floodwater when the rice was at the panicle initiation stage. Emission of nitrous oxide and dinitrogen was measured directly during the day and overnight, using a cover collection method and gas chromatographic and mass spectrometric analytical methods. Ammonia volatilization was calculated with a bulk aerodynamic method from measurements of wind speed and floodwater pH, temperature and ammoniacal nitrogen concentration. Seven days after urea application the¹⁵N₂ content of the floodwater and soil porewater was determined and total fertilizer nitrogen loss was calculated from an isotopic balance.Throughout the experimental period gas fluxes were low; nitrous oxide, ammonia and dinitrogen flux densities were less than 5, 170 and 720 g N ha^–1 d^–1, respectively. The greatest dinitrogen flux density was observed two days after urea addition and this declined to ~ 100 g ha^–1 d^–1 after seven days.The data indicate that, of the urea nitrogen added, 0.02% was lost to the atmosphere as nitrous oxide, 0.9% was lost by ammonia volatilization, and 3.6% was lost as dinitrogen gas during the 7 days of measurement. At the end of this period 0.028% and 0.002% of the added nitrogen was retained as dinitrogen gas in the floodwater and soil porewater respectively. Recovery of the¹⁵N applied as nitrogen gases, plant uptake, and soil and floodwater constituents totaled about 94% of the nitrogen added.     

Effect of green manure on the yield,N uptake and floodwater properties of a flooded rice,wheat rotation receiving15N urea on a highly permeable soil

Field studies were conducted for two years on a rapidly percolating loamy sand (Typic Ustochrept) to evaluate the effect of green manure (GM) on the yield,¹⁵N recovery from urea applied to flooded rice, the potential for ammonia loss and uptake of residual fertilizer N by succeeding crops. The GM crop ofSesbania aculeata was grownin situ and incorporated one day before transplanting rice. Urea was broadcast in 0.05 m deep floodwater, and incorporated with a harrow. Green manure significantly increased the yield and N uptake by rice and substituted for a minimum of 60 kg fertilizer N ha^–1. The recovery of fertilizer N as indicated by¹⁵N recovery was higher in the GM + urea treatments. The grain yield and N uptake by succeeding wheat in the rotation was slightly higher with GM. The recovery of residual fertilizer N as indicated by the¹⁵N recovery in the second, third and fourth crops of wheat, rice and wheat was only 3, 1 and 1 per cent of the urea fertilizer applied to the preceding rice crop. Floodwater chemistry parameters showed that the combined use of the GM and 40 kg N ha^–1 as urea applied at transplanting resulted in a comparatively higher potential for NH₃ loss immediately after fertilizer application. The actual ammonia loss as suggested by the¹⁵N recoveries in the rice crop, however, did not appear to be appreciably larger in the GM treatment. It appeared the ammonia loss was restricted by low ammoniacal-N concentration maintained in the floodwater after 2 to 3 days of fertilizer application.     

Urea-rubber matrices as slow-release fertilizers

The efficacy of a prototype slow-release fertilizer, urea-rubber matrix (URM) was assessed under flooded rice conditions. URM cuboids of size 0.5 × 1.0 × 0.4 cm were applied in comparison with prilled urea at levels of 50, 130 and 200 kg N ha^?1. URM was placed at the soil/solution interface in intimate association with rice seedlings whereas prilled urea was broadcast into the floodwater to simulate the normal application method of South East Asian farmers. URM cuboid sizes of 0.25 × 0.5 × 0.4 cm, 0.5 × 0.5 × 0.4 cm and 1.0 × 1.0 × 0.4 cm were similarly evaluated at a single rate of 130 kg N ha^?1; a broadcast URM treatment was also included. Different methods of prilled urea application including deep placement and split application were also studied at a single rate of 130 kg N ha^?1. It was found that the build-up of floodwater N (urea + NH ₄ ⁺ ) from URM during the 13 days following application was almost negligible irrespective of level or method of application. This was thought to result in low losses of N through ammonia volatilization as shown by higher rice grain yields in comparison with prilled urea at all levels of application. Deep-placed urea gave a comparable grain yield to that of broadcast URM. There was no significant difference in grain yield between URM applied by placement and by broadcast, suggesting that URM can be effectively applied either in intimate association with rice seedlings or by broadcasting to the rice field before, or after, planting. An attempt to predict the release of urea from URM was made using a diffusion-based simulation model. It was found that the model underestimated the actual release of urea from URM within the rhizosphere, probably due to the extensive penetration by rice roots of the URM cuboids.     

The effect of the urease inhibitor N-(n-butyl) thiophosphoric triamide on the efficiency of urea application in a flooded rice field trial in Thailand

The compound N-(n-butyl) thiophosphoric triamide (nBTPT) was tested for its ability to reduce the rate of urea hydrolysis in applications of urea at 10 d after transplanting flooded rice. The rates of urea hydrolysis were relatively slow, and nBTPT caused a 1-d reduction in the rate of disappearance of urea from the floodwater. Despite this, the vapor pressures of ammonia in the floodwater were significantly lower in the plots with nBTPT than without for the first 5 d following the N application. The vapor pressures of ammonia measured in the afternoons indicate that ammonia volatilization losses were considerable from the treatments without nBTPT and low from the treatments with nBTPT. There was no nitrogen response in this wet-season crop, apparently because of the high availability of N in the soil. N conserved from ammonia volatilization losses by use of the inhibitor was apparently susceptible to denitrification loss, and 50% of the fertilizer was lost in the 37 d following the application of¹⁵N-labeled urea both with and without the inhibitor.     

Ammonia volatilization from fertilizers applied to irrigated wheat soils

A series of experiments using flow chambers was undertaken in the field to investigate the effects of stubble and fertilizer management, soil moisture and precipitation on ammonia volatilization following nitrogen application on chromic luvisols. In the first factorial experiment, urea at 100 kg N ha^–1 was applied to the soil surface one, three and six days following irrigation; there were four rice stubble management systems comprising stubble burnt, stubble burnt then rotary hoed, stubble rotary hoed into the soil and stubble retained on the surface. Cultivation almost halved ammonia loss. The higher loss from uncultivated plots was ascribed to an alkaline ash bed on burnt plots, and to higher soil moisture and some retention of urea prills in the crop residue above the soil surface of the stubble retention plots. Average volatilization over a 12 day period following urea application from plots fertilizer one, three or six days after irrigation was 16, 15 and 4 kg N ha^–1, respectively. Daily application of up to 1.7 mm of water did not reduce volatilization and 35 kg N ha^–1 was lost within five days of fertilization. Daily precipitation of 6.8 mm reduced loss to 14 kg N ha^–1. This quantity of rain is uncommon in the region and it was concluded that showery conditions are unlikely to reduce volatilization. The third experiment demonstrated that the quantity of stubble on the soil surface had no effect on volatilization, and all plots lost 25% of applied nitrogen. In the fourth experiment, 100 kg N ha^–1 as urea or ammonium nitrate was either broadcast onto the surface or stubble retention plots, or placed, and partly covered to simulate topdressing with a disc implement. Partial burial of urea reduced ammonia volatilization from 36 to 7 kg N ha^–1, while partial burial of ammonium nitrate reduced loss from 4 to 0 kg N ha^–1.     

Effect of controlled-release fertilizer on nitrous oxide emission from a winter wheat field

A 2-year field experiment was conducted to study effects of application rate of controlled-release fertilizer (CRF) and urea on N₂O emission from a wheat cropping system. Two kinds of N fertilizers, CRF and urea, and four application rates (0, 100, 200 and 270?kg?N?ha^?1) were used. Results indicate that the application of either urea or CRF, increased total N₂O emission during the wheat growing period linearly from 32 to 164?%, with increasing N rate (p?<?0.05), compared to the zero N control, and the increase was less significant in CRF than urea treatments. Compared with urea, CRF significantly reduced N₂O emission by 25?C56?% during the wheat growing period (p?<?0.05), and the effect was more significant when N rate was higher. Grain yield increased in a power pattern from 24 to 43?% in urea treatments and from 30 to 45?% in CRF treatments with increasing N rate (p?<?0.05). Specific N₂O emission (N₂O emission per unit of yield) increased linearly from 31 to 114?% in urea treatments (p?<?0.05), and from 2 to 50?% in CRF treatments (p?<?0.05), with increasing N rate. Compared with urea, CRF significantly inhibited specific N₂O emission (p?<?0.05), and the effect increased with increasing N rate. Peaks of N₂O emission did not occur immediately after fertilization, but did immediately after rainfall events. CRF released fertilizer-N slowly, prolonging nitrogen supply and reducing peaks of N₂O fluxes stimulated by rainfall. The application rate of CRF could be reduced by 26?C50?% lower than that of urea for mitigating N₂O emission without sacrificing grain yield. We would not risk any significant loss of wheat yield while achieving economic and environmental benefits by reducing urea or CRF application rate from 270?kg to 200?kg?N?ha^?1.     

Nitrogen loss from ammonium bicarbonate and urea fertilizers applied to flooded rice

Total nitrogen loss and ammonia volatilization from applications of ammonium bicarbonate and urea to flooded rice (Oryza sativa L.) grown on an acidic lacustrine clay in China were measured by¹⁵N balance and micrometeorological methods. Attempts were also made to reduce nitrogen loss by using different methods of applying the fertilizers.Ammonia volatilization from ammonium bicarbonate was greater than that from urea (18.2% and 8.8%, respectively, of the applied N). The total loss of ammonia from urea in this study was less than the losses observed in similar studies elsewhere. This was presumably because of the low incident radiation and low floodwater pHs in this experiment.Denitrification losses, calculated as the difference between total nitrogen loss and ammonia loss, were 42.2% and 39.3%, respectively, for ammonium bicarbonate and urea, and thus were more important than ammonia losses from both types of fertilizer.The different management treatments studied had an appreciable effect on ammonia flux densities but did not reduce the overall loss as measured by¹⁵N-balance.     

Effect of urea management on yield and N use efficiency of lowland rice on an acid sulfate soil

Field experiments were conducted during 1988–1989 at two adjacent sites on an acid sulfate soil (Sulfic Tropaquept) in Thailand to determine the influence of urea fertilization practices on lowland rice yield and N use efficiency. Almost all the unhydrolyzed urea completely disappeared from the floodwater within 8 to 10 d following urea application. A maximum partial pressure of ammonia (pNH₃) value of 0.14 Pa and an elevation in floodwater pH to about 7.5 following urea application suggest that appreciable loss of NH₃ could occur from this soil if wind speeds were favorable. Grain yields and N uptake were significantly increased with applied N over the control and affected by urea fertilization practices (4.7–5.7 Mg ha^–1 in dry season and 3.0–4.1 Mg ha^–1 in wet season). In terms of both grain yield and N uptake, incorporation treatments of urea as well as urea broadcasting onto drained soil followed by flooding 2 d later were more effective than the treatments in which the same fertilizer was broadcast directly into the floodwater either shortly or 10 d after transplanting (DT). The¹⁵N balance studies conducted in the wet season showed that N losses could be reduced to 31% of applied N by broadcasting of urea onto drained soil and flooding 2 d later compared with 52% loss by broadcasting of urea into floodwater at 10 DT. Gaseous N loss via NH₃ volatilization was probably responsible for the poor efficiency of broadcast urea in this study.     

Ammonia volatilization from a flooded rice field fertilized with amended urea materials

The extent of ammonia volatilization from prilled urea, urea supergranule and urea amended with neem seed cake, shell-lac and dicyandiamide was studied in a field experiment on flooded rice. The ammonia loss was measured by the closed acid trap method. The collected ammonia was highest from unamended prilled urea, accounting for 19 to 20 per cent of the applied N in 1983 and 20 to 24 per cent of the applied N in 1984. Coating of urea prills was either coaltar soaked neem seed cake or shell-lac was more effective than coating with dicyandiamide in reducing ammonia loss. Deep placement of urea as a supergranule was the most effective method of reducing ammonia volatilization. A diurnal variation in the pH and temperature of floodwater was observed. The quantity of ammonia collected in the acid trap was closely related to ammoniacal-N concentration and pH of the floodwater.     

Urease activity and inhibition in flooded soil systems

Ammonia volatilization is an important mechanism of N loss from flooded rice soils. Inhibition of urease may delay the formation of conditions favorable to NH₃ volatilization in the floodwater, thus giving the soil and plant a better chance to compete with the atmosphere as a sink for N. The experiments reported here were designed to identify the site of urea hydrolysis in flooded soils and to attempt selective urease inhibition with some of the inhibitors reported in the literature.Studies with three flooded soils using¹⁵N-labeled urea showed that 50–60% of the urea was found in the floodwater, despite incorporation. This floodwater urea is hydrolyzed largely at the soil—floodwater interface and subsequently returns to the floodwater (> 80%) or is retained by the soil (< 20%). Of the following urease inhibitors (K-ethyl-xanthate; 3 amino-1-H-1, 2, 4-triazole; phenylphosphorodiamidate) added at 2% (w/w of urea), only the latter was able to delay the appearance of NH₃ (aq) in the flood-water and thus delay NH₃ volatilization. Use of an algicide addition to the floodwater depressed NH₃ (aq) levels during the entire period studied, but in the presence of PPD the algicide had little additional effect.     

Processes of nitrogen loss from fertilizers applied to flooded rice fields on a calcareous soil in north-central China

Losses of nitrogen were investigated after applications of ammonium bicarbonate and urea to flooded rice at transplanting. Ammonia (NH₃) volatilization was determined by direct micrometeorological methods, and total loss of fertilizer nitrogen (N) was measured by¹⁵N balance. All the loss appeared to be in gaseous forms, since there was no evidence of leaching and runoff was prevented. The difference between N loss and NH₃ loss was thus assumed to be denitrification loss.Both NH₃ volatilization and denitrification losses were large, being 39% and 33%, respectively, of the ammonium bicarbonate N, and 30% and 33%, respectively, of the urea N applied by farmers' methods.Ammonia fluxes from the field fertilized with ammonium bicarbonate were very high for two days, and then declined rapidly as the NH₃ source in the floodwater diminished. Moderate fluxes from the field fertilized with urea continued over 6 days, but calculations showed that NH₃ transfer from floodwater to atmosphere was retarded during the middle period of the experiment, particularly on day 2 when a thick algal scum appeared on the water surface. The results indicate that this algal mass obstructed the transport of NH₃ across the water-air interface until the scum was dispersed by wind action. Nevertheless, the prolonged NH₃ losses on the urea treatment were due primarily to high floodwater pH values promoted by the strong algal growth during the daylight hours.Nitrogen-15 balance studies showed that incorporation of fertilizer into drained soil substantially increased recoveries of fertilizer N in rice plants and soil compared with incorporation of fertilizer in the presence of standing floodwater. Ammonia loss measurements on these treatments when urea was applied suggested that the improvement in fertilizer N efficiency was due mainly to reductions in NH₃ loss.     

Fate of broadcast urea in a flooded soil when treated with N-(n-butyl) thiophosphoric triamide,a urease inhibitor

The compound N-(n-butyl) thiophosphoric triamide (NBPT) was found to be a more effective ureas inhibitor than phenyl phosphorodiamidate (PPDA) in flooded soils when compared at concentrations of from 0.5 to 5% of the weight of urea. It allowed essentially no ammoniacal-N to acumulate in the floodwater when added at 0.5% of the weight of urea. The fate of urea was also determined in a flooded, unplanted soil with NBPT used as an inhibitor at a rate of 2% by weight of urea. At 41 days, fertilizer-N loss without the inhibitor was 73.4%, whereas with NBPT, 34.7% of the fertilizer was lost, presumably all by denitrification. With NBPT, urea hydrolysis was not inhibited below a 1 cm depth in the soil and most of the N (35.0%) accumulated as exchangeable NH ₄ ⁺ -N. Except for 15.0% of the fertilized accumulated as organic-N on the soil surface layer, immobilized N accounted for only an additional 7.0% in the soil at 22 days. Although the N saved from NH₃ volatilization loss obviously is eligible for denitrification losses, denitrification apparently was not enhanced to an appreciable extent by use of the inhibitor in that total losses were 15.7% at 22 days.     

Fate of nitrogen fertilizer applied to lowland rice on a Sulfic Tropaquept

A field experiment was conducted on an acid sulfate soil in Thailand to determine the effect of N fertilization practices on the fate of fertilizer-N and yield of lowland rice (Oryza sativa L.). A delayed broadcast application of ammonium phosphate sulfate (16-20-0) or urea was compared with basal incorporation of urea, deep placement of urea as urea supergranules (USG), and amendment of urea with a urease inhibitor. Deep placement of urea as USG significantly reduced floodwater urea- and ammoniacal-N concentrations following N application but did not reduce N loss, as determined from an¹⁵N balance, in this experiment where runoff loss was prevented. The urease inhibitor, phenyl phosphorodiamidate (PPD), had little effect on floodwater urea- and ammoniacal-N, and it did not reduce N loss. The floodwater pH never exceeded 4.5 in the 7 days following the first N applications, and application of 16-20-0 reduced floodwater pH by 0.1 to 0.3 units below the no-N control. The low floodwater pH indicated that ammonia volatilization was unimportant for all the N fertilization practices. Floodwater ammoniacal-N concentrations following application of urea or 16-20-0 were greater on this Sulfic Tropaquept than on an Andaqueptic Haplaquoll with near neutral pH and alkaline floodwater. The prolonged, high floodwater N concentrations on this Sulfic Tropaquept suggested that runoff loss of applied N might be a potentially serious problem when heavy rainfall or poor water control follow N fertilization. The unaccounted-for¹⁵N in the¹⁵N balances, which presumably represented gaseous N losses, ranged from 20 to 26% of the applied N and was unaffected by urea fertilization practice. Grain yield and N uptake were significantly increased with applied N, but grain yield was not significantly affected by urea fertilization practice. Yield was significantly lower (P = 0.05) for 16-20-0 than for urea; however, this difference in yield might be due to later application of P and hence delayed availability of P in the 16-20-0 treatment.     

Effects of rainfall and fertilizer types on nitrogen and phosphorus concentrations in surface runoff from subtropical tea fields in Zhejiang, China

The increasing input of fertilizers in tea (Camellia sinensis L.) fields may contribute to the deterioration of surface water quality. A plot study was conducted over a 2-year period (2010?C2011) to evaluate the effects of rainfall and fertilizer types on nitrogen (N) and phosphorus (P) concentrations in surface runoff from tea fields. Studies were arranged on slope of 18?% of red clay at a subtropical tea fields in Tiaoxi watershed of Zhejiang province, southeast China. Organic (OF), slow-release (SRF), and conventional chemical fertilizers were applied to different plots at rates of 248?kg?N?ha^?1 and 125.2?kg?P?ha^?1 in 2010 and 300?kg?N?ha^?1 and 100?kg?P?ha^?1 in 2011. Rainfall amounts showed statistically significant correlations with concentrations of TN and TP in runoff water from all fertilized treatments. Although equivalent N and P were applied in each fertilized treatment, the OF treatment had the lowest annual arithmetic mean concentration of total N in runoff in 2010 (6.1?mg?L^?1) and was amongst the lowest in 2011 (9.2?mg?L^?1) with concentration statistically similar to SRF (9.0?mg?L^?1). The SRF treatment had the lowest annual arithmetic mean concentration of total P in runoff in 2010 (1.50?mg?L^?1), while few differences were observed in concentration of total P between fertilized treatments in 2011. The research results suggested that replacement of conventional chemical fertilizers with organic or slow-release fertilizers in tea fields could reduce N and P losses while maintaining tea yields.     

Nitrogen loss from different tillage systems and the effect on cereal grain yield

Grain yield, nitrogen (N) assimilation, ammonia (NH₃) volatilization, denitrification and fertilizer N distribution were examined in three commercially grown cereal crops; two were sown into conventionally tilled fields, while the third was direct drilled into an untilled field. The crops were top dressed with urea at establishment, tillering or ear initiation. Crop yield and N assimilation were measured in 16 m by 2.5 m plots receiving 0, 35, 70, 105, 140 or 175 kg N ha^–1. A mass balance micrometeorological technique was used to measure NH₃ volatilization, and other fertilizer N transformations and transfers were studied using¹⁵N labelled urea in microplots.On the conventionally tilled sites application of urea increased the grain yield of wheat from 3.9 to 5.5 t ha^–1, when averaged over the five application rates, three application times and two sites. There were no site or application time effects. However, on the direct drilled site, time of application had a significant effect on grain yield. When urea was applied at establishment, grain yield was not significantly increased and the mean yield (2.81 t ha^–1) was less than that obtained from treatments fertilized at tillering or ear initiation (4.09 and 4.0 t ha^–1, respectively). Much of the variation in grain yield at the no-till site could be ascribed to differences in NH₃ volatilization. At the no-till site, NH₃ losses were equivalent to 24, 12 and 1% of the N applied at establishment, tillering and ear initiation, respectively. Negligible volatilization of NH₃ occurred at the other sites. The surface soil at the no-till site had the highest urease activity and the soil was covered with alkaline ash resulting from stubble burning.Plant recovery of fertilizer N did not vary with application time on conventionally tilled sites (mean 62%). However, plant recovery of¹⁵N applied to the no-till site at establishment (35% of the applied N) was significantly less than that from plots where the application was delayed (45% at tillering and 55% at ear initiation, respectively). Leaching of N to below 300 mm depth was minimal (0 to 5% of the applied N). The calculated denitrification losses ranged from 1% to 14% of the applied N.The results show that the relative importance of NH₃ volatilization, leaching and denitrification varied with site and fertilization time. The importance of the various N loss mechanisms needs to be taken into account when N fertilization strategies are being developed.     

Nitrogen-15 balance as affected by rice straw management in a rice-wheat rotation in northwest India

The sustainability of the productive rice-wheat systems of Northwest India is being questioned due to the complete removal of straw for animal consumption and fuel, or the burning of straw which has reduced the soil organic matter contents. However, straw incorporation at planting can temporarily reduce the availability of fertilizer-N and reduce crop yields. In a field study on a loamy sand soil, the effect of 6 mg ha⁻¹ rice straw incorporated into the soil 20 or 40 days before sowing (DBS) the wheat was compared with removal or burning of rice straw on the fate and balance of 120 kg ha⁻¹ of 5 atom% ¹⁵N-urea applied to wheat and to a following crop of rice. Wheat grain yield and agronomic efficiency (AE) of applied N (kg grain/kg N applied) were not influenced by rice straw management. However, N uptake (NU), and recovery efficiency (RE) of N by the difference method were lower with rice straw incorporation than with burning. Nitrogen-15 recovery by wheat was highest (41%) when the rice straw was removed or burned and lowest (30.4%) when 30 of the 120 kg N ha⁻¹ was applied at the time of straw incorporation at 20 DBS of wheat. However, this strategy of adding 25% of the urea-N dose at the time of straw incorporation resulted in the highest ¹⁵N losses (45.2%). Inorganic N remaining at harvest in the 0 to 60 cm soil profile, mostly NO₃ ⁻, was 5.5% after wheat and 4.2% after rice. Rice grain yields, NU, and RE were not influenced by rice straw management. Nitrogen-15 losses were similar in rice and wheat (31% with straw removed) despite total irrigation and rainfall inputs of 340 and 32 cm to rice and wheat, respectively. These results suggest to the farmers of northwest India that straw incorporation does not necessarily hurt grain yields, and indicates to researchers that work is still needed to improve N use efficiency in rice and wheat. This revised version was published online in June 2006 with corrections to the Cover Date.     

Nitrogen loss and rice profits with matrix-based slow-release urea

Paddy fields account for a large proportion of cultivated land, with huge N consumption each year. Reducing N loss via application of low-cost slow-release fertilizers is beneficial for eco-friendly rice production. The current study aimed to investigate the effects of matrix-based urea on soil N availability, rice yield, agronomical efficiency (AE), and rice profits. A 2-year field experiment was conducted during 2015 and 2016 following a randomized block design. It included three treatments, i.e., control test (CK, without urea application), common urea (CU, 150 kg N ha^?1), and matrix-based urea (MU, 150 kg N ha^?1). Besides, three laboratory experiments were conducted to investigate the N leaching, ammonia volatilization, and slow-release mechanism. Results showed that application of MU increased rice yields by > 10%, biomass by > 6%, and AE by > 30% in both seasons. Greater yield, biomass, and AE in MU were largely attributed to higher soil available N, resulted from lower risk of N leaching and ammonia volatilization. Aggregate structure was partly responsible for lower N loss in MU. Greater soil available N in MU increased rice height, leaf area, root area, leaf total chlorophyll, and activity of nitrate reductase and glutamine synthetase in flag leaves, and thus favored rice growth. Compared with CU, MU increased fertilizer cost by about 23 USD ha^?1, but increased rice profits by > 230 USD ha^?1 due to greater yield. Overall, matrix-based urea is suitable for application in field rice production, due to its low risk of N loss and acceptable profitability.     

Nitrogen and sulphur fertilization effect on leaching losses, nutrient balance and plant quality in a wheat–rapeseed rotation under a humid Mediterranean climate

An unbalanced S and/or N fertilization may have low N and S use efficiency together with substantial negative implications for yield, nutrient losses and plant quality parameters. The effect of N and S fertilization and their interactions on N?CS balances, on N?CS losses and on some plant quality parameters were investigated in a field experiment with a wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)?Crapeseed (Brassica napus L.)?Cwheat rotation (2005?C2008). The study was conducted under humid Mediterranean climatic conditions on a potentially S deficient soil. The effects of N (0, 140, 180, 220?kg?N?ha^?1 in wheat; 0, 100, 140, 180, 220?N?ha^?1 in rapeseed) combined with S fertilizer rates (0, 16 and 32?kg S ha^?1 in wheat and 0, 30, 60?kg S ha^?1 in rapeseed) were studied. Nitrogen fertilization increased yield by 55?% in wheat and 60?% in rapeseed, N concentration in grain and straw and S concentration in the grain of wheat. However, it led to a reduction in the S concentration of straw and the oil content of the rapeseed seed. The S application did not increase yield but had a positive effect on S concentration in the wheat straw. Glucosinolate concentration, a potentially toxic secondary metabolite in rapeseed, was not influenced by N or S applications. Nitrate leaching tended to increase with N application while sulphate leaching decreased. A net N and S mineralization was observed in each growing season, except for the first year in which a net S immobilization was observed. To make N fertilizer recommendations, the N mineralization from the previous crop residues should be taken into account. For S fertilizer recommendations, N supply is the most important item both from a qualitative point of view (N/S ratio in wheat grain) and an environmental point of view (S leaching).     

Control of gaseous nitrogen losses from urea applied to flooded rice soils

This paper reports field experiments designed to determine whether the two main processes responsible for nitrogen (N) loss from flooded rice (ammonia volatilization and denitrification) are independent or interdependent, and glasshouse studies which investigated the effect of soil characteristics on gaseous nitrogen loss.In the first field experiment ammonia (NH₃) loss from the floodwater was controlled using algicides, biocides, frequent pH adjustment, shade or cetyl alcohol, and the effect of these treatments on total N loss and denitrification was determined. Most treatments reduced NH₃ loss through their effects on algal growth and floodwater pH. Total gaseous N loss (54% to 35%) and NH₃ loss (20% to 1.2%) were affected similarly by individual treatments, indicating that the amount lost by denitrification was not substantially changed by any of the treatments.In a subsequent field experiment NH₃ and total N loss were again affected similarly by the treatments, but denitrification losses were very low. In control treatments with different rates of urea application, NH₃ and total N loss were each a constant proportion of the urea applied (NH₃ loss was 17% and total N loss was 24%). These results indicate that techniques which reduce NH₃ loss can be expected to reduce total gaseous N loss.The glasshouse experiment showed that gaseous N losses could be reduced by draining off the floodwater, and incorporating the urea into the 0–0.05 m soil layer before reflooding. Even with this method, losses varied widely (6–27%); losses were least from a cracking clay and greatest from a coarse sand which allowed the greatest mobility of the applied N. Incorporation of applied urea can therefore be expected to prevent losses more successfully from clay soils with high ammonium retention capacity.