Rotational object discrimination by pigeons.

Four experiments examined the discrimination of directional object motion by pigeons. Four pigeons were tested in a go/no-go procedure with video stimuli of geons rotating right or left around their central y-axis. This directional discrimination was learned in 7 to 12 sessions and was not affected by changes in object starting orientation, but did require the coherent ordering of the videos’ successive frames. Subsequent experiments found no or little transfer of this motion discrimination to novel objects. Experiments varying the speed of rotation and degrees of apparent motion per frame revealed that both factors strongly affected the discrimination. Finally, tests with partial occlusion of different portions of a rotating object suggested that the majority of the object was likely involved in determining rotational direction. These experiments indicate that pigeons can exclusively use motion cues to judge relative object motion. They also suggest the pigeons may have used a specific representation of the motion sequences of each object to make the discrimination. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2010 APA, all rights reserved)     

Generalized auditory same-different discrimination by pigeons.

Three pigeons were trained in a successive same/different (S/D) procedure using compound auditory stimuli (pitch/timbre combinations). Using a go/no-go procedure, pigeons successfully learned to discriminate between sequences of either all same (AAAA...or BBBB...) or all different (ABCD...) sequences consisting of 12 sounds. Both pitch and timbre were subsequently established as controlling dimensions. Transfer tests with novel stimuli revealed a generalized basis for the discrimination (novel pitch/timbre combinations, novel pitches, novel instruments, and complex natural & man-made sounds). These results indicate for the first time that pigeons can learn generalized same/different discriminations in a nondominant modality. When combined with earlier visual results, they support a qualitative similarity among birds and primates in their capacity to judge this type of fundamental stimulus relation across different modalities. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2010 APA, all rights reserved)     

Perceptual differentiation during categorization learning by pigeons.

In Experiment 1, pigeons were trained to categorize two sets of variable stimuli (black and white checkerboard patterns), constructed by random distortions of two prototype patterns. They were subsequently trained on new discriminations, between two new exemplars of their positive category, two new exemplars of their negative category, or two control checkerboard patterns. The new exemplars of their familiar categories were easier to discriminate than the wholly novel stimuli, although this difference was significant only for exemplars of their previously negative category. In Experiment 2, pigeons were initially trained on a discrimination between two prototype checkerboards; they subsequently learned to discriminate between two distortions of their negative prototype more rapidly than between two control patterns. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2010 APA, all rights reserved)     

Conceptual behavior in pigeons: Categorization of both familiar and novel examples from four classes of natural and artificial stimuli.

Two new procedures—a four-key choice procedure and a four-ply multiple fixed ratio schedule procedure—were used to train pigeons to categorize color slides depicting natural (cat, person, flower) and human-made (car, chair) objects. In Experiments 1{a}, 1{b}, 2{a}, and 2{b}, 16 pigeons trained with 10 slides from each of four categories reliably classified novel examples from these categories. However, performance was more accurate on training than on novel stimuli. In Experiment 3, 8 pigeons learned to classify 2,000 nonrepeating slides. Thus, repetitive training with a limited number of stimuli is not necessary for pigeons to learn a four-category classification task. In Experiment 4, 4 pigeons were trained with a set of repeating slides while concurrently being trained with novel stimuli. As in Experiments 1{a}, 1{b}, 2{a}, and 2{b}, performance here was more discriminative on repeatedly seen stimuli than on novel ones. Thus, repetition facilitates categorization, whether or not the pigeons are concurrently exposed to novel stimuli. The implications of these results for models of categorization are discussed. We conclude that the conceptual abilities of pigeons are more advanced than hitherto suspected. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2010 APA, all rights reserved)     

Conditional same-different discrimination by pigeons: Acquisition and generalization to novel and few-item displays.

The authors explored whether pigeons can learn to discriminate simultaneously presented arrays of 16 identical (Same) visual items from arrays of 16 nonidentical (Different) visual items, when the correct choice was conditional on the presence of another cue: the color of the background. In one experiment, pigeons rapidly learned this task and, after training with arrays created from a 72-icon set, they exhibited nearly perfect transfer to novel testing arrays. In a second experiment, pigeons’ accuracy to 24-, 20-, 12-, and 8-icon arrays during later testing remained as high as accuracy to training arrays; although accuracy declined with 4- and 2-icon arrays, it was still significantly above chance. In both experiments, pigeons’ choice reaction time scores nicely complemented their choice accuracy scores. These results suggest that the conditional discrimination procedure is well suited to disclose same-different discrimination in pigeons and to elucidate the interaction between perception and abstraction in conceptual learning. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2010 APA, all rights reserved)     

Abstract-concept learning carryover effects from the initial training set in pigeons (Columba livia).

Three groups of pigeons were trained in a same/different task with 32, 64, or 1,024 color-picture stimuli. They were tested with novel transfer pictures. The training-testing cycle was repeated with training-set doublings. The 32-item group learned the same/different task as rapidly as a previous 8-item group and transferred better than the 8-item group at the 32-item training set. The 64- and 1,024-item groups learned the task only somewhat slower than other groups, but their transfer was better and equivalent to baseline performances. These results show that pigeons trained with small sets (e.g., 8 items) have carryover effects that hamper transfer when the training set is expanded. Without carryover effects (i.e., initial transfer from the 32- and 64-item groups), pigeons show the same degree of transfer as rhesus and capuchin monkeys at these same set sizes. This finding has implications for the general ability of abstract-concept learning across species with different neural architectures. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2010 APA, all rights reserved)     

Mental rotation in pigeons (Columba livia)?

Previous research has shown pigeons to be insensitive to the orientation of visual test stimuli both for response latency and for discrimination ratio. Discrimination of stimulus orientation has been more difficult to learn than discrimination of small arbitrary differences between stimuli. This has suggested that the visual processing of pigeons is orientation invariant, which would obviate the need for mental rotation such as is often observed in studies with human subjects. Contrary to previous findings, the current experiment obtained linear effects of orientation on response latency and discrimination ratio, with a go/no-go procedure. Pigeons (Columbia livia) first learned to discriminate among line drawings of similar objects and then were tested with rotated versions of the drawings. The pattern of data is similar to that found in studies of human recognition of rotated objects. One speculative explanation of this finding is the mental rotation of stimuli by pigeons. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2010 APA, all rights reserved)     

The effect of distinctive parts on recognition of depth-rotated objects by pigeons (Columba livia) and humans.

To explore whether effects observed in human object recognition represent fundamental properties of visual perception that are general across species, the authors trained pigeons (Columba livia) and humans to discriminate between pictures of 3-dimensional objects that differed in shape. Novel pictures of the depth-rotated objects were then tested for recognition. Across conditions, the object pairs contained either 0, 1, 3, or 5 distinctive pails. Pigeons showed viewpoint dependence in all object-part conditions, and their performance declined systematically with degree of rotation from the nearest training view. Humans showed viewpoint invariance for novel rotations between the training views but viewpoint dependence for novel rotations outside the training views. For humans, but not pigeons, viewpoint dependence was weakest in the 1-part condition. The authors discuss the results in terms of structural and multiple-view models of object recognition. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2010 APA, all rights reserved)     

Timing light and tone signals in pigeons.

Pigeons' ability to time light and tone stimuli was examined in four experiments. In Experiment 1, two groups of pigeons were trained to discriminate between 2- and 8-s durations of lights or tones and then were transferred to reversal or nonreversal discriminations in the alternate modality. Pigeons learned the light discrimination faster than the tone discrimination and showed immediate positive intermodal transfer from tone to light but not from light to tone. In Experiments 2–4, the peak procedure was used to study birds' timing of 15- and 30-s fixed-interval light and tone signals. Peak times on empty trials under baseline conditions closely approximated the length of fixed-interval signals. When pigeons were tested with time-outs and intermodal switches introduced midway through an empty trial, they tended to reset the timing mechanism and begin timing again from 0 s. With both estimation and production procedures, pigeons were less accurate when timing the tone stimuli than when timing the light stimuli. A comparison of these data with data from timing experiments with rats suggests several possible differences in timing processes between pigeons and rats. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2010 APA, all rights reserved)     

A comparative analysis of the categorization of multidimensional stimuli: I. Unidimensional classification does not necessarily imply analytic processing; evidence from pigeons (Columba livia), squirrels (Sciurus carolinensis), and humans (Homo sapiens).

Pigeons (Columba livia), gray squirrels (Sciurus carolinensis), and undergraduates (Homo sapiens) learned discrimination tasks involving multiple mutually redundant dimensions. First, pigeons and undergraduates learned conditional discriminations between stimuli composed of three spatially separated dimensions, after first learning to discriminate the individual elements of the stimuli. When subsequently tested with stimuli in which one of the dimensions took an anomalous value, the majority of both species categorized test stimuli by their overall similarity to training stimuli. However some individuals of both species categorized them according to a single dimension. In a second set of experiments, squirrels, pigeons, and undergraduates learned go/no-go discriminations using multiple simultaneous presentations of stimuli composed of three spatially integrated, highly salient dimensions. The tendency to categorize test stimuli including anomalous dimension values unidimensionally was higher than in the first set of experiments and did not differ significantly between species. The authors conclude that unidimensional categorization of multidimensional stimuli is not diagnostic for analytic cognitive processing, and that any differences between human’s and pigeons’ behavior in such tasks are not due to special features of avian visual cognition. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2010 APA, all rights reserved)     

Dynamic object perception by pigeons.

Three experiments examined pigeon discrimination of computer-generated three-dimensional (3-D) projections of cube and pyramid objects. Four pigeons were tested using a go/no-go procedure involving static and dynamically rotating presentations of these stimuli. Transfer tests with different types of rotational and featural transformations suggested the pigeons may have used a 3-D representation of the objects as their primary means of performing the discrimination. The comparative implications for object and motion perception in animals are considered. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2010 APA, all rights reserved)     

Transfer of a discrimination by pigeons (Columba livia) between pictured locations and the represented environments.

In Exp 1, pigeons (Columba livia) were trained in a successive slide presentation procedure to discriminate between pictures of 2 ends of a room and then trained to find food in the actual room. A congruent-transfer (CT) group learned the spatial discrimination more quickly than an incongruent-transfer (IT) group. In Exp 2's replication we used a simultaneous slide presentation procedure and added a control group. The IT group required significantly more trials than the CT or control groups. In Exp 3, order of the training conditions was reversed. CT and IT conditions had no effect on the speed of acquisition of the discrimination. This indicates that pigeons acquire a representation of spatial locations from pictures, which can then direct behavior, but the direction of transfer observed was unidirectional. This suggests that a discrimination between spatial locations may not be accurately represented in pictorial form. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2010 APA, all rights reserved)     

Pigeons (Columba livia) associate time intervals with symbols in a touch screen task: Evidence for ordinality but not summation.

The present experiments examined whether pigeons can sum symbols that are associated with various temporal consequences in a touch screen apparatus. Pigeons were trained to discriminate between two visual symbols that were associated with 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, or 5 s either of delay to 4 s of hopper access (delay group) or duration of hopper access (reward group). In Experiment 1, the pigeons in both groups learned to select the symbol associated with the more favorable outcome, and they successfully transferred this discrimination to novel symbol pairs. However, when tested with 2 pairs of symbols associated with different summed durations, they responded on the basis of a simple response rule rather than the sum of the symbol pair. In Experiment 2, the reward group was presented with four symbols at once and was allowed to successively choose one symbol at a time. All pigeons chose the symbols in order from largest to smallest. This indicates that pigeons formed an ordered representation of symbols associated with different time intervals, even though they did not sum the symbols. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2010 APA, all rights reserved)     

Detection of information specifying the motion of objects by 3- and 5-month-old infants.

Two studies investigated the ability of 56 3.5- and 5-mo-olds to recognize and discriminate among different motions of rigid objects. In each study, Ss were habituated to 1 of 2 motions made by several different objects. After reaching criterion, they were tested with a novel object making the familiar motion and a novel one. At 5 mo, Ss discriminated (a) the translation of an object from rotation plus translation, (b) translation alone from rotation alone, (c) full rotation on the vertical axis from oscillation on the vertical axis, and (d) rotation to the left and rotation to the right. At 3.5 mo, Ss responded differently only in the 1st case, and it was less clear that they were discriminating on the basis of motion. Three additional studies, with 64 5-mo-olds, suggested that texture on the surface of the object and the projected contour were both important to the discrimination of the different motions. Results are discussed in terms of disruptions in the optic array. (15 ref) (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2010 APA, all rights reserved)     

The role of video coherence on object-based motion discriminations by pigeons.

Two experiments examined the effects of video coherence on the discrimination of relative motion by pigeons using a go/no-go procedure. Pigeons were trained to discriminate video stimuli in which the camera's perspective went either "around" or "through" the interior opening of 2 approaching objects. Experiment 1 used a within-groups design and Experiment 2 used a between-groups design to examine how sequencing these videos in a coherent smooth forward order versus a randomly scrambled order influenced learning. Discrimination learning was significantly faster with the coherent sequences. It is suggested that the pigeon visual system integrates 3-dimensional motion signals across space and time to produce a stable, object-based, perceptual world. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2010 APA, all rights reserved)     

Effects of varying stimulus size on object recognition in pigeons.

The authors investigated the pigeon's ability to generalize object discrimination performance to smaller and larger versions of trained objects. In Experiment 1, they taught pigeons with line drawings of multipart objects and later tested the birds with both larger and smaller drawings. The pigeons exhibited significant generalization to new sizes, although they did show systematic performance decrements as the new size deviated from the original. In Experiment 2, the authors tested both linear and exponential size changes of computer-rendered basic shapes to determine which size transformation produced equivalent performance for size increases and decreases. Performance was more consistent with logarithmic than with linear scaling of size. This finding was supported in Experiment 3. Overall, the experiments suggest that the pigeon encodes size as a feature of objects and that the representation of size is most likely logarithmic. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2010 APA, all rights reserved)     

Discrimination of contour-deleted images by pigeons.

Three experiments attempted to determine which properties of pictorial representations of objects control their discrimination by pigeons. A particular focus was whether the representation mediating such discriminations could be described by the simple viewpoint-invariant primitive volumes of I. Biederman's (1987) recognition-by-components theory of object recognition or by J. Cerella's (1990) particulate features. In all 3 experiments, pigeons were first trained to discriminate drawings of 4 stimulus objects with half of the contour deleted but with the component geons postulated by Biederman's theory recoverable. Discrimination accuracy was then compared for test items containing the original particulate features, affording the retrieval of the original component geons, or having neither of these properties of the training stimuli. Although response accuracy was significantly greater when the component geons of the original objects were retrievable, measurable control over recognition by the particulate features of the objects and by their specific locations was also found. The results are consistent with the idea of component geon recognition as one of the important factors in object discrimination. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2010 APA, all rights reserved)     

Relative pitch perception is constrained by absolute pitch in songbirds (Mimus, Molothrus, and Sturnus).

Assessed the ability of starlings (Sturnus vulgaris), cowbirds (Molothrus ater), and a mockingbird (Mimus polyglottos) to maintain a relative pitch discrimination when the absolute frequencies of a serial pattern of tones were changed. In Exp I, 7 Ss learned a relative pitch discrimination between 4-tone sequences that either ascended or descended in frequency within a 1-octave range. Results show that Ss lost the discrimination completely when the frequency range was shifted an octave above or below the initial training range. Recovery of the discrimination in the novel ranges was slow, and considerable relearning was necessary. Starling Ss, however, easily generalized the relative pitch discrimination to new frequencies within the original training range. In Exp II, 4 starlings were trained on the same relative ascending–descending discrimination in 2 noncontiguous frequency ranges. Ss lost the discrimination when transferred into a novel gap of frequencies between the original training ranges. Findings demonstrate that songbirds can learn a relational discrimination between serial pitch patterns but that their ability to generalize the discrimination is constrained markedly by the frequency range in which the sound sequences are learned initially. (46 ref) (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2010 APA, all rights reserved)     

Necessity of spatial pooling for the perception of heading in nonrigid environments.

This study examined whether the perception of heading is determined by spatially pooling velocity information. Observers were presented displays simulating observer motion through a volume of 3-D objects. To test the importance of spatial pooling, the authors systematically varied the nonrigidity of the flow field using two types of object motion: adding a unique rotation or translation to each object. Calculations of the signal-to-noise (observer velocity-to-object motion) ratio indicated no decrements in performance when the ratio was .39 for object rotation and .45 for object translation. Performance also increased with the number of objects in the scene. These results suggest that heading is determined by mechanisms that use spatial pooling over large regions. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2010 APA, all rights reserved)     

Visual discrimination learning and strategy behavior in the fat-tailed dunnarts ( Sminthopsis crassicaudata ).

Fat-tailed dunnarts (Sminthopsis crassicaudata) were trained on visual discrimination learning-set, reversal-set, and spatial delayed-alternation tasks. The learning set involved 36 2-way black-and-white pattern discriminations and 5 probe reversals. Ten reversals of a black-and-white pattern discrimination were followed by 5 novel tasks. Spatial alternation was tested at delays up to 20 s. Learning-set and reversal-set formation, including 1-trial learning and spontaneous transfer from learning set to reversals and vice versa, was found. Learning-set-experienced dunnarts showed no retention of previously learned tasks 1 week after testing but demonstrated consistently high Trial 2 performance, indicating the retention of a response strategy. Delayed-alternation tasks were learned up to 10-s delays. These results provide the first evidence of a visually guided "win-stay, lose-shift" strategy in a marsupial. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2010 APA, all rights reserved)