Genetic diversity of nifH gene sequences in paenibacillus azotofixans strains and soil samples analyzed by denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis of PCR-amplified gene fragments

PURPOSE: To determine the maximum-tolerated dose (MTD), dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs), and pharmacokinetic profile of the dolastatin 15 analog LU103793 when administered daily for 5 days every 3 weeks. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Fifty-six courses of LU103793 at doses of 0.5 to 3.0 mg/m2 were administered to 26 patients with advanced solid malignancies. Pharmacokinetic studies were performed on days 1 and 5 of course one. Pharmacokinetic variables were related to the principal toxicities. RESULTS: Neutropenia, peripheral edema, and liver function test abnormalities were dose-limiting at doses greater than 2.5 mg/m2 per day. Four of six patients developed DLT at 3.0 mg/m2 per day, whereas two of 12 patients treated at 2.5 mg/m2 per day developed DLT. Pharmacokinetic parameters were independent of dose and similar on days 1 and 5. Volume of distribution at steady-state (Vss) was 7.6 +/- 2.0 L/m2, clearance 0.49 +/- 0.18 L/h/m2, and elimination half-life (t1/2) 12.3 +/- 3.8 hours. Peak concentrations (Cmax) on day 1 related to mean percentage decrement in neutrophils (sigmoid maximum effect (Emax) model). Patients who experienced dose-limiting neutropenia had significantly higher Cmax values than patients who did not, whereas nonhematologic DLTs were more related to dose. CONCLUSION: The recommended dose for phase II evaluations of LU103793 daily for 5 days every 3 weeks is 2.5 mg/m2 per day. The lack of prohibitive cardiovascular effects and the generally acceptable toxicity profile support the rationale for performing disease-directed evaluations of LU103793 on the schedule evaluated in this study.     

Phase I clinical and pharmacologic study of weekly cisplatin combined with weekly irinotecan in patients with advanced solid tumors

PURPOSE: In vitro synergy between cisplatin and irinotecan (CPT-11) has been reported. We designed a combination schedule of these agents to maximize the potential for synergistic interaction. PATIENTS AND METHODS: To maximize the opportunity for synergy, we divided the cisplatin into four consecutive weekly treatments, followed by a 2-week rest. Each dose of cisplatin was immediately followed by a dose of irinotecan. The dose of cisplatin was fixed at 30 mg/m2/wk. The initial irinotecan dose was 50 mg/m2/wk and this was escalated by 30% increments in successive cohorts of three to six patients to establish the maximum-tolerated dose (MTD). Pharmacokinetics of irinotecan and its metabolites, SN-38 and SN-38 glucuronide (SN-38G), were analyzed. RESULTS: Of 35 patients with solid tumors enrolled onto this trial, 30 were assessable for toxicity and response. The MTD for this regimen was 30 mg/m2/wk of cisplatin plus 50 mg/m2/wk of irinotecan in previously treated patients and 30 mg/m2/wk of cisplatin plus 65 mg/m2/wk of irinotecan in chemotherapy-naive patients. Neutropenia was the dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) encountered in this trial. Diarrhea was infrequent and rarely dose-limiting. Seven of 30 assessable patients achieved a partial response. No alteration in irinotecan, SN-38, or SN-38G pharmacokinetics resulted from the administration of cisplatin with irinotecan. CONCLUSION: The administration of cisplatin and irinotecan on this weekly schedule provides a practical and well-tolerated regimen that has the potential to maximize any clinical synergy between the two agents. Evidence of substantial clinical activity was seen in this phase I study.     

Phase I trial of docetaxel and cisplatin in previously untreated patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer

PURPOSE: To determine the maximum-tolerated doses (MTDs), principal toxicities, and pharmacokinetics of the combination of docetaxel and cisplatin administered every 3 weeks to patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) who have not received prior chemotherapy and to recommend a dose for phase II studies. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with advanced NSCLC and performance status 0 to 2 who had not received prior chemotherapy received docetaxel over 1 hour followed by cisplatin over 1 hour with hydration. Dose levels studied were (docetaxel/cisplatin) 50/75, 75/75, 75/100, and 100/75 mg/m2 repeated every 3 weeks. Colony-stimulating factor (CSF) support was not used. Pharmacokinetics of docetaxel and cisplatin were studied in the first cycle of therapy. Most patients (79%) had metastatic disease or intrathoracic recurrence after prior radiation and/or surgery. RESULTS: Of 24 patients entered, all were assessable for toxicity and 18 for response. The MTD schedules were docetaxel 75 mg/m2 with cisplatin 100 mg/m2 (dose-limiting toxicities [DLTs] in five of six patients), and docetaxel 100 mg/m2 with cisplatin 75 mg/m2 (DLTs in two of two patients, including one fatal toxicity). Limiting toxicities were febrile neutropenia and nonhematologic, principally diarrhea and renal. Two patients had neutropenic enterocolitis. Pharmacokinetics of both drugs were consistent with results from single-agent studies, which suggests no major pharmacokinetic interaction. Neutropenia was related to docetaxel area under the plasma concentration-versus-time curve (AUC). An alternative schedule was investigated, with cisplatin being administered over 3 hours commencing 3 hours after docetaxel, but toxicity did not appear to be less. Independently reviewed responses occurred in eight of 18 patients (44%; 95% confidence interval, 22% to 69%), most following 75 mg/m2 of both drugs. CONCLUSION: Docetaxel 75 mg/m2 over 1 hour followed by cisplatin 75 mg/m2 over 1 hour is recommended for phase II studies. The responses seen in this phase I study suggest a high degree of activity of this combination in previously untreated advanced NSCLC.     

Purification and characterization of human sarcomeric mitochondrial creatine kinase

PURPOSE: A dose-escalation study of irinotecan hydrochloride (CPT-11) combined with fixed-dose cisplatin was conducted to determine the maximum-tolerated dose (MTD), dose-limiting toxicities, and objective response rate in patients with advanced gastric cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Twenty-four patients with or without prior chemotherapy were enrolled. All patients were assessable for toxicities and response. On day 1, CPT-11 was administered as a 90-minute intravenous (I.V.) infusion, which was followed 2 hours later by a 120-minute I.V. infusion of cisplatin 80 mg/m2. CPT-11 alone at the same dose was administered again on day 15. The treatment was repeated every 4 weeks until disease progression was observed. The initial dose of CPT-11 was 60 mg/m2, and was escalated in increments of 10 mg/m2 until severe or life-threatening toxicity was observed. RESULTS: The MTD of this combination was CPT-11 80 mg/m2. At this dose level, 16.7% of patients (two of 12) had leukopenia of less than 1,000/microL, 66.7% (eight of 12) had neutropenia of less than 500/microL, and 16.7% (two of 12) had severe diarrhea of grade 4 during the first course. The dose-limiting toxicity was neutropenia. Ten patients achieved a partial response (PR), and the overall response rate was 41.7% among 24 patients (95% confidence interval, 21.9% to 61.4%). CONCLUSION: The recommended dose and schedule is CPT-11 70 mg/m2 on days 1 and 15 and cisplatin 80 mg/m2 on day 1 every 4 weeks. This combination of CPT-11 and cisplatin, considered to be active against advanced gastric cancer with acceptable toxicity, should be further assessed in a phase II study.     

Paclitaxel by 96-hour continuous infusion in combination with cisplatin: a phase I trial in patients with advanced lung cancer

PURPOSE: To determine the maximum-tolerated dose (MTD) of paclitaxel administered by 96-hour continuous infusion in combination with cisplatin, to determine if the addition of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) permits significant paclitaxel dose escalation, and to assess the toxicity and preliminary activity of this combination in patients with advanced lung cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Fifty patients with untreated lung cancer were enrolled: 42 had advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and eight had extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer (SCLC). Patients received paclitaxel doses of 100 to 180 mg/m2/96 hours and cisplatin doses of 60 to 80 mg/m2 as a single 30-minute bolus injection at the end of the paclitaxel infusion. RESULTS: Two of six patients experienced dose-limiting neutropenia at a dose of paclitaxel 140 mg/m2/96 hours and cisplatin 80 mg/m2. With G-CSF support, one of three patients experienced both dose-limiting mucositis and fatal neutropenic sepsis at a dose of paclitaxel 180 mg/m2/96 hours and cisplatin 80 mg/m2. Significant peripheral neuropathy developed in five patients and occurred after six or more cycles of therapy. Thirty-three of 42 patients with NSCLC had measurable disease; the objective response rate was 55%, with two complete responses and 16 partial responses. For all 42 patients with NSCLC, the median time to progression and median survival duration were 5 months and 10 months, respectively. The actuarial 1-year survival rate was 41%. Of eight SCLC patients, four responded to therapy, and the median survival duration for all SCLC patients was 11 months. CONCLUSION: The MTD without G-CSF is paclitaxel 120 mg/m2/96 hours and cisplatin 80 mg/m2, and the MTD with G-CSF is paclitaxel 160 mg/m2/96 hours and cisplatin 80 mg/m2. Infusional paclitaxel with cisplatin is well tolerated and active in patients with advanced NSCLC.     

Phase I and pharmacologic study of penclomedine, a novel alkylating agent, in patients with solid tumors

PURPOSE: To determine the maximum-tolerated dose (MTD), principal toxicities, and pharmacologic behavior of penclomedine, a novel alkylating agent. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Penclomedine (45 to 550 mg/ m2/d every 3 weeks) was administered as a 1- or 3-hour intravenous (IV) infusion for 5 consecutive days to patients with solid tumors. RESULTS: On a 1-hour dosing schedule, ataxia, vertigo, nystagmus, and a motor aphasia were the principal toxicities of penclomedine. These neurologic effects were dose-related, and evolved from complaints of somnolence and dizziness, to more pronounced signs and symptoms of cerebellar dysfunction. Up to and including doses of 415 mg/m2, these effects were well tolerated and resolved within 2 hours posttreatment. In contrast, both patients treated at the 550-mg/m2 dose level experienced a dose-limiting constellation of perinfusional aphasia and vertigo, with either ataxia of over 2 weeks' duration or recurrent dizziness. Prolongation of the infusion duration to 3 hours at this dose level resulted in less neurotoxicity; however, delayed trilineage hematologic toxicity precluded timely administration on this schedule. A statistically significant relationship was demonstrated between the development of ataxia and maximum plasma concentrations of penclomedine. CONCLUSION: Neurotoxicity was the dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) of penclomedine administered as a 1-hour infusion daily for 5 days every 3 weeks, and the recommended dose for further evaluations was 415 mg/m2. The nature of the principal toxicities and the lack of any detectible antitumor activity indicate that phase II evaluations of penclomedine on this administration schedule should be focused on specific disease settings, such as breast cancer and intracerebral tumors, in which antitumor activity has been demonstrated.     

Phase I study of docetaxel dose escalation in combination with fixed weekly gemcitabine in patients with advanced malignancies

PURPOSE: To determine the maximum-tolerated dose of monthly docetaxel combined with fixed-dose weekly gemcitabine and describe the dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) of the combination. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with refractory solid tumors were treated with gemcitabine days 1, 8, and 15 every 4 weeks at a fixed dose of 800 mg/m2. Two docetaxel administration schedules were studied, with the drug administered either day 1 or day 15 at doses of 45, 60, 75, and 100 mg/m2 per cycle. RESULTS: Forty patients received 132 cycles of chemotherapy. On the day-1 schedule, the maximum-tolerated docetaxel dose was the highest planned dose of 100 mg/m2 with two DLT episodes among 12 patients treated with 34 cycles at this dose level. On the day-15 schedule, delivery of the planned docetaxel doses was not feasible because of thrombocytopenia and hepatic dysfunction. Hematologic toxicities included grade 4 neutropenia in 16 patients, with three episodes of febrile neutropenia; grades 3 to 4 thrombocytopenia in nine patients; and anemia that required RBC transfusions in 10 patients. For patients treated at the highest docetaxel dose level, myelosuppression was not dose limiting and only one of 34 cycles was complicated by febrile neutropenia. The most common nonhematologic toxicities were asthenia, flu-like symptoms, and fluid retention. Antineoplastic activity was noteworthy, with partial responses in nine of 21 patients with pretreated non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC; 43%; 95% confidence interval, 22 to 66), in four of seven patients with breast cancer, and in one patient with esophageal adenocarcinoma. CONCLUSION: Gemcitabine 800 mg/m2 days 1,8, and 15 can be safely combined with docetaxel 100 mg/m2 day 1 of a 28-day cycle. The observed antitumor activity warrants phase II evaluation.     

Phase I trial of continuous infusion flavopiridol, a novel cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor, in patients with refractory neoplasms

PURPOSE: We conducted a phase I trial of the cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor, flavopiridol (National Service Center [NSC] 649890), to determine the maximum-tolerated dose (MTD), toxicity profile, and pharmacology of flavopiridol given as a 72-hour infusion every 2 weeks. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Seventy-six patients with refractory malignancies with prior disease progression were treated with flavopiridol, with first-cycle pharmacokinetic sampling. RESULTS: Forty-nine patients defined our first MTD, 50 mg/m2/d x 3 with dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) of secretory diarrhea at 62.5 mg/kg/d x 3. Subsequent patients received antidiarrheal prophylaxis (ADP) to define a second MTD, 78 mg/m2/d x 3 with DLT of hypotension at 98 mg/m2/d x 3. Other toxicities included a proinflammatory syndrome with alterations in acute-phase reactants, particularly at doses >50 mg/ m2/d x 3, which in some patients prevented chronic therapy every 2 weeks. In some patients, ADP was not successful, requiring dose-deescalation. Although approximately 70% of patients displayed predictable flavopiridol pharmacology, we observed unexpected interpatient variability and postinfusion peaks in approximately 30% of cases. At the two MTDs, we achieved a mean plasma flavopiridol concentration of 271 nM (50 mg/m2/d x 3) and 344 nM (78 mg/m2/d x 3), respectively. One partial response in a patient with renal cancer and minor responses (n=3) in patients with non-Hodgkin's lymphoma, colon, and renal cancer occurred. CONCLUSION: The MTD of infusional flavopiridol is 50 mg/m2/d x 3 with dose-limiting secretory diarrhea at 62.5 mg/m2/d x 3. With ADP, 78 mg/m2/d x 3 was the MTD, with dose-limiting hypotension at 98 mg/m2/d x 3. Based on chronic tolerability, 50 mg/m2/d x 3 is the recommended phase II dose without ADP. Antitumor effect was observed in certain patients with renal, prostate, and colon cancer, and non-Hodgkin's lymphoma. Concentrations of flavopiridol (200 to 400 nM) needed for cyclin-dependent kinase inhibition in preclinical models were achieved safely.     

Phase I study of weekly outpatient paclitaxel and concurrent cranial irradiation in adults with astrocytomas

PURPOSE: Astrocytomas are extremely resistant to currently available treatments. Cranial irradiation is a mainstay of frontline therapy, but tumor recurrence is nearly universal. Paclitaxel has shown antitumor efficacy against astrocytoma cell lines, and is a potent radiosensitizer. For these reasons, we conducted a phase I study of weekly paclitaxel and concurrent cranial irradiation in patients with newly diagnosed astrocytomas. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with astrocytomas were eligible for this study following initial surgery if they had a Karnofsky performance score (KPS) > or = 60%; normal hematologic, liver, and renal function; and could give informed consent. Beginning on day 1 of treatment, patients received paclitaxel by 3-hour infusion once weekly for 6 weeks, concurrent with standard cranial irradiation. Pharmacokinetic studies were performed on 10 patients. RESULTS: Sixty patients were enrolled; 56 were fully assessable. Forty-eight had glioblastomas (GBMs), 10 anaplastic astrocytomas (AAs), and two astrocytomas. Age ranged from 21 to 81 years (median, 55); KPS ranged from 60 to 100 (median, 70). The paclitaxel dose was escalated from 20 mg/m2 to 275 mg/m2. No clinically significant anemia or thrombocytopenia occurred. Only one patient (175 mg/m2) became neutropenic. Sensory neuropathy was dose-limiting. The maximum tolerated dose (MTD) was 250 mg/m2. Paclitaxel pharmacokinetic profiles in study patients were identical to those of previously reported patients with other solid tumors. CONCLUSION: The MTD of paclitaxel administered weekly for 6 weeks by 3-hour infusion is 250 mg/m2. Since patients with brain tumors often have preexisting neurologic deficits, we suggest 225 mg/m2 as the optimum dose for phase II trials in this group of patients.     

Hepatitis G virus RNA and hepatitis G virus-E2 antibodies in Dutch hemophilia patients in relation to transfusion history

PURPOSE: Docetaxel is a highly active antineoplastic agent; however, grade IV leukopenia occurs in the large majority of patients treated with a dose of 100 mg/m2 every 3 weeks. Recent experience with weekly paclitaxel has demonstrated a bone marrow-sparing effect when a weekly administration schedule is used. We investigated a weekly schedule of docetaxel in an attempt to alter the toxicity profile and improve the therapeutic index. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Thirty-eight patients with advanced, refractory malignancy entered this phase I trial between October 1996 and June 1997. Docetaxel was administered weekly for 6 consecutive weeks, followed by 2 weeks without treatment. Sequential cohorts of patients were treated at the following dose levels: 20, 25, 30, 36, 43, and 52 mg/m2. Patients were reevaluated after one course (8 weeks); patients with objective response or stable disease continued treatment for a maximum of four courses or until disease progression. RESULTS: Thirty-five patients completed at least one course of therapy. Myelosuppression was not a dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) at any of the doses tested. Only five episodes of grade III leukopenia occurred (14% of patients, 2% of doses), and no grade IV leukopenia was produced. No grade III or IV thrombocytopenia or anemia was observed. Grade III fatigue and asthenia were observed in all three patients treated at 52 mg/m2/wk and in two of 10 at 43 mg/m2/wk. Other grade III toxicity included acral erythema (n = 1), neuropathy (n = 1), peripheral edema (n = 1), and diarrhea (n = 1). The DLTs of this docetaxel schedule are fatigue and asthenia. Although the maximum-tolerated dose by definition of this study was 43 mg/m2/wk, we selected 36 mg/m2/wk for ongoing phase II studies. CONCLUSION: The toxicity profile of docetaxel is markedly altered when the drug is administered by a weekly schedule. Myelosuppression is mild and uncommon. Fatigue and asthenia are the DLTs; other nonhematologic toxicities, which included peripheral edema and neuropathy, are uncommon, and the arthralgia/myalgia syndrome was not observed. Weekly administration of docetaxel may provide a better tolerated, efficacious use of this drug; further investigation of weekly docetaxel as a single agent and in combination regimens is warranted.     

The relationship between AIDS dementia complex and the presence of macrophage tropic and non-syncytium inducing isolates of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 in the cerebrospinal fluid

CPT-11 is a camptothecin derivative with a broad spectrum of antitumor activity, both in vitro and in vivo. Like camptothecin, CPT-11 is a selective DNA topoisomerase I inhibitor. Phase I trials were conducted in Europe to determine the dose and schedule for phase II trials. These phase I trials assessed the toxicity of CPT-11 in 235 patients and tested three administration schedules: a single infusion once every 3 weeks; a weekly infusion for 3 out of 4 weeks; and a daily infusion for 3 consecutive days every 3 weeks. The maximum tolerated dose (MTD) was 115 mg/m2 in the daily schedule and 145 mg/m2 in the weekly schedule. When the drug was administered once every 3 weeks, diarrhea became the dose-limiting toxicity at doses above 350 mg/m2. This schedule offered the highest dose intensity and the best tolerability profile, and was the most convenient for outpatient treatment. Finally, using this schedule, concomitant administration of high-dose loperamide allowed the dose of CPT-11 to be increased to 750 mg/m2. An ongoing phase I trial is investigating the combination of CPT-11 and 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) in various solid tumors. Although the MTD has not yet been reached, preliminary results show no pharmacokinetic interaction between the two drugs, contrary to a previous Japanese study. Based on the results of the three phase I trials, CPT-11 350 mg/m2 as an intravenous infusion over 30 minutes once every 3 weeks was recommended for phase II trials, which started in Europe in 1992. To date, CPT-11 has shown remarkable efficacy in colorectal cancer, even in patients resistant to 5-FU. Interesting results have also been obtained in pancreatic, cervical and lung cancers. Future trials will explore the place of CPT-11 in combination with other cytotoxic agents or radiotherapy.     

Phase I trial of 9-aminocamptothecin in children with refractory solid tumors: a Pediatric Oncology Group study

PURPOSE: A phase I trial of 9-aminocamptothecin (9-AC) was performed in children with solid tumors to establish the dose-limiting toxicity (DLT), maximum-tolerated dose (MTD), and the pharmacokinetic profile in children and to document any evidence of activity. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A 72-hour infusion of 9-AC dimethylacetamide formulation was administered every 21 days to 23 patients younger than 21 years of age with malignant tumors refractory to conventional therapy. Doses ranged from 36 to 62 microg/m2 per hour. Pharmacokinetics were to be performed in at least three patients per dose level. The first course was used to determine the DLT and MTD. RESULTS: Nineteen patients on four dose levels were assessable for toxicities. At 62 microg/m2 per hour, three patients experienced dose-limiting neutropenia and one patient experienced dose-limiting thrombocytopenia. Pharmacokinetics were performed on 15 patients (nine patients had complete sets of plasma sampling performed). The pharmacokinetics of both lactone and total 9-AC were highly variable. The percentage of 9-AC lactone at steady-state was 10.8% +/- 3.6%. Total 9-AC and its lactone form had a terminal half-life of 8.1 +/- 3.8 and 7.1 +/- 3.9 hours, respectively, and a volume of distribution at steady-state (Vdss) of 21.2 +/- 13.3 L/m2 and 135.3 +/- 52.5 L/m2, respectively. Hepatic metabolism and biliary transport had an important role in 9-AC disposition. CONCLUSION: The recommended phase II dose of 9-AC administered as a 72-hour infusion every 21 days to children with solid tumors is 52 microg/m2 per hour. Neutropenia and thrombocytopenia were dose limiting.     

Radiotherapy and concomitant weekly 1-hour infusion of paclitaxel in the treatment of head and neck cancer--results from a Phase I trial

PURPOSE: To define the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) by describing the dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) of weekly paclitaxel (PAC) given as a 1-h I.V. infusion in patients with head and neck cancer concomitant to irradiation. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Patients with unresectable or incompletely resected head and neck cancer were enrolled into a prospective, dose-escalating Phase I study. Toxicity was graded according to the WHO toxicity score. MTD dose was defined when two out of six patients developed DLT. The starting dose of PAC was 20 mg/m2 once weekly I.V. over 60 min, with a subsequent dose escalation of 10 mg/m2 in cohorts of three new patients. Radiation therapy was administered in three field technique over 6-7 weeks in 2.0 Gy/daily fractions for 5 consecutive days/week up to total doses of 60-70 Gy. RESULTS: From 1994-1996, 18 patients completing three dose levels were included into the study. Altogether, 101 courses of chemotherapy were evaluable for toxicity. On the second dose level (30 mg/m2) one of three patients experienced DLT with Grade IV mucositis. On the next dose level with 40 mg/m2 PAC weekly one patient experienced DLT being prolonged Grade III mucositis. From the following three patients required, two patients showed no DLT. The third patient showed mucositis of WHO Grade 4 and died from hemorrhage caused by a rupture of the a pharyngeal wall. Dose level 2 (30 mg/m2) was repeated and one of the three newly treated patients again suffered from mucositis WHO Grade 4. CONCLUSION: When PAC is given weekly as a 1-h infusion concomitant to radiotherapy, MTD is 30 mg/m2 with mucositis being DLT; hematological and further nonhematological toxicity is mild.     

Preclinical and phase I clinical studies with the nonclassical antifolate thymidylate synthase inhibitor nolatrexed dihydrochloride given by prolonged administration in patients with solid tumors

PURPOSE: A phase I, multicenter trial of the thymidylate synthase (TS) inhibitor THYMITAQ (nolatrexed dihydrochloride; Agouron Pharmaceuticals, Inc, San Diego, CA) given by 5-day continuous infusion was performed to establish the maximum-tolerated dose (MTD) and to investigate pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, and antitumor effects. METHODS: In vitro and in vivo preclinical studies demonstrated increased activity with prolonged nolatrexed exposure. In 32 patients, nolatrexed was given as a 5-day infusion at 96 to 1,040 mg/m2/d for 5 days. Pharmacokinetics were determined from high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) analyses of plasma and urine. In addition to studying toxicity, plasma deoxyuridine (UdR) elevations were measured as a marker of TS inhibition. RESULTS: The MTD was 904 mg/m2/d for 5 days and the recommended phase II dose is 800 mg/m2/d for 5 days. The dose-limiting toxicity was neutropenia with clinically significant thrombocytopenia and mucositis. These antiproliferative toxicities of nolatrexed were predictable and reversible. A partial response that lasted 3 months occurred in a patient with metastatic colorectal cancer. Pharmacokinetics were nonlinear, with the median plasma clearance (CI) decreasing from 151 mL/min/m2 (range, 124 to 211) at 96 mg/m2/d for 5 days to 49 mL/min/m2 (range, 30 to 84) at 768 mg/ m2/d for 5 days. The half-life (t1/2) was 173 minutes (range, 43 to 784) and 18% (range, 9% to 35%) of the dose was excreted unchanged in the urine. Plasma UdR increased, but returned to pretreatment levels after the end of infusion. Hematologic toxicity was significantly related to nolatrexed plasma concentrations and dose. CONCLUSION: Nolatrexed can be safely administered to patients at a dose of 800 mg/m2/d over 5 days by continuous intravenous infusion and this schedule is associated with antitumor effects. The phase II evaluation of nolatrexed is ongoing.     

Phase I trial of low-dose continuous topotecan infusion in patients with cancer: an active and well-tolerated regimen

PURPOSE: The objective of this trial was to define the maximum-tolerated dose (MTD) of topotecan for a 21-day infusion schedule, repeated every 28 days, in patients with cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Cohorts of four patients received continuous ambulatory infusions of topotecan in escalated duration with doses beginning at 0.20 mg/m2/d for 7 days. Forty-four patients with a histologic diagnosis of cancer refractory to standard therapy were treated with infusions of topotecan for a total of 115 cycles and 1,780 patient-days of infusion. The median number of treatment cycles per patient was two (range, one to eight). All patients were heavily pretreated with chemotherapy and/or radiation. RESULTS: The dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) was myelo-suppression, with thrombocytopenia greater than neutropenia seen at the dose level of 0.70 mg/m2/d for 21 days. At the MTD of 0.53 mg/m2, ten patients were treated for a total of 20 courses, resulting in one episode of grade 4 thrombocytopenia and leukopenia, one grade 3 thrombocytopenia, and two grade 3 leukopenias. This dose regimen was well tolerated, with minimal nonhematologic toxicity. Local infusion port complications developed in two patients and two had bacteremia, including one patient with repeated local skin infections. Objective responses were observed in this heavily pretreated population for patients with ovarian cancer (two partial responses and one mixed response in six patients), breast cancer (one partial response and one mixed response in two patients), and for one patient each with renal and non-small-cell lung cancer (two partial remissions). CONCLUSION: Twenty-one-day topotecan infusion is well tolerated at 0.53 mg/m2, with dose-intensity exceeding other schedules for administration of topotecan. The DLT is hematologic, with thrombocytopenia somewhat exceeding leukopenia. Objective responses were observed in seven patients with breast, ovarian, renal, and non-small-cell lung cancer.     

Leucovorin modulation of 5-iododeoxyuridine radiosensitization: a phase I study

Evidence for clinically significant radiosensitization by the halogenated pyrimidine 5-iododeoxyuridine (IdUrd) continues to accumulate. In vitro radiosensitization has been demonstrated in human colon tumor cell lines following exposure to 1-10 micrometer. Coadministration of leucovorin (LV) increases radiosensitization, which correlates directly with increased IdUrd DNA incorporation. Clinical data regarding proliferation rates and thymidine kinase levels in tumors versus normal tissues suggest selective incorporation of IdUrd into gastrointestinal tumors may occur. The objectives of this Phase I study were: (a) to assess the feasibility of LV modulation of IdUrd radiosensitization by determining the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of IdUrd plus LV; and (b) to perform correlative laboratory studies to investigate the potential of IdUrd plus LV to increase radiosensitization in vivo. Seventeen patients with unresectable or recurrent gastrointestinal adenocarcinomas received a 14-day course of continuous i.v. infusion of IdUrd prior to initiation of radiotherapy. Two additional 14-day infusions of IdUrd with LV were given during the course of radiotherapy (60 Gy in 6 weeks). The initial dose of IdUrd was 250 mg/m2/day and was escalated in subsequent patients to 400 and 600 mg/m2/day. The LV dose remained fixed at 250 mg/m2/day. Leukopenia was the dose-limiting toxicity, and 400 mg/m2/day was the MTD for this trial. At the MTD, the mean +/- SD steady-state plasma concentration of IdUrd during the infusion, measured by high-performance liquid chromatography, was 0.66 +/- 0.23 micrometer. There was no significant influence of LV on IdUrd DNA incorporation in peripheral blood granulocytes as measured by high-performance liquid chromatography. Based on toxicity data and correlative laboratory studies, a meaningful increase in radiosensitization would not be achieved with the IdUrd infusion schedule and dose of LV investigated compared with IdUrd alone.     

p53 autoantibodies in the sera, cyst and ascitic fluids of patients with ovarian cancer

LY231514 is a novel antifolate that principally inhibits thymidylate synthase, but with additional folate-dependent enzyme targets. A Phase I study of single-agent LY231514 administered as a daily i.v. infusion over 10 minutes for 5 days, repeated every 3 weeks, was conducted to evaluate the maximum tolerated dose, pharmacokinetic profile, and antitumor activity of the drug using this schedule. Thirty-eight patients with advanced malignancies that were refractory or not amenable to standard therapy were treated with a total of 116 courses of LY231514, escalating treatment doses through 10 dose levels, from 0.2-5.2 mg/m2/day. No objective clinical responses were observed, although minor antitumor activity not fulfilling the response criteria was seen in three patients. A maximum tolerated dose of 4.0 mg/m2/day was determined, with neutropenia as the predominant dose-limiting toxicity. Reversible disturbances of liver biochemistry, fulfilling the protocol definitions of dose-limiting toxicity, were also observed. Other toxicities included diarrhea, mucositis, skin rash, and fatigue. Pharmacokinetic studies were performed at all treatment levels. Analysis showed a linear relation between administered dose and both maximum plasma concentration (Cmax) and area under the plasma concentration/time curve. The drug was cleared with a day 1 total body clearance of 108.9 +/- 38.8 ml/min/m2, with plasma concentrations declining with a mean harmonic terminal half-life of 1.4 +/- 0.98 h. When given by this schedule, LY231514 is tolerable, and Phase II studies are in progress.     

Phase I and pharmacologic study of intermittent twice-daily oral therapy with capecitabine in patients with advanced and/or metastatic cancer

PURPOSE: Capecitabine is an orally administered fluoropyrimidine carbamate selectively activated to fluorouracil (5-FU) in tumors. It passes through the intestinal mucosal membrane intact and is subsequently activated by a cascade of three enzymes that results in the preferential release of 5-FU at the tumor site. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In this phase I study, capecitabine was administered twice daily as outpatient therapy, each cycle administered for 2 weeks followed by 1 week of rest. Thirty-four patients with solid tumors, all of whom except three patients were pretreated, were treated at dose levels from 502 to 3,514 mg/m2 daily. RESULTS: The median treatment duration was four cycles (85 days; range, 14 to 833+ days). Two patients continue on treatment at 686 and 833+ days. Capecitabine 3,000 mg/m2 daily was not tolerable, with dose-limiting toxicities of diarrhea with hypotension, abdominal pain, and leukopenia. Palmar-plantar erythrodysesthesia (PPE) became evident at higher dose levels after prolonged treatment. Evidence of objective tumor response was reported in four patients at 2,510 mg/m2 daily and greater (one complete response [CR] and three partial responses [PRs]) with subjective minor tumor responses in a further seven patients. Pharmacokinetic studies showed rapid gastrointestinal absorption of capecitabine, followed by extensive conversion into 5'-deoxy-5-fluorouridine (5'-DFUR), with only low systemic 5-FU levels. CONCLUSION: Capecitabine is a tolerable oral outpatient therapy that shows promising clinical activity in a variety of cancers. The recommended phase II dose is 2,510 mg/m2 daily administered by this intermittent schedule.     

Klinefelter syndrome

BACKGROUND: To determine the maximum tolerable dose (MTD) and therapeutic activity of MTHF-modulated FU using two different administration schedules of the antimetabolite (bolus vs. two-hour infusion), the present randomized study using a 'pick-the-winner' design was undertaken in patients with advanced colorectal cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Eighty-two patients with previously untreated advanced measurable colorectal cancer were randomly assigned to treatment with MTHF (100 mg/m2 days 1-5 i.v. bolus) plus FU (400 mg/m2 days 1-5) given either as i.v. bolus injection or as a two-hour infusion every four weeks. In the absence of dose-limiting toxicity (DLT, defined as > or = WHO grade 3 hematotoxicity and/or > or = WHO grade 2 nonhematologic side effects) and evidence of progressive disease, the FU dose was escalated by 50 mg/m2/day during each subsequent cycle until the individual maximum tolerable dose (MTD) was reached. RESULTS: Forty patients were randomized to the FU bolus arm and 42 patients to the FU two-hour infusion arm. The median MTD was 475 mg/m2/day (95% CI: 450-500) in the FU bolus arm with stomatitis +/- diarrhea being the most common DLT. Gastrointestinal side effects were also dose-limiting in the two-hour infusion arm; however, the median MTD was 600 mg/m2/day (95% CI: 568-632). Myelosuppression was more pronounced in the FU bolus arm than in the two-hour infusion arm. The overall response rates were 27.5% (95% CI: 15-44%; 1 CR and 10 PR) for patients treated in the bolus arm and 14.5% (95% CI: 5-28%; 1 CR and 5 PR) for those treated in the two-hour infusion arm. Analogous to recorded response, median time to progression (8.5 vs. 6.25) and overall survival time (14.0 vs. 11.0) tended to be superior in the FU bolus arm. CONCLUSIONS: The observed differences in tolerable drug dose and toxicity between the two treatment arms might be explained by the administration schedule-dependent clinical pharmacokinetics of FU and/or the difference in extent of biochemical modulation of the antimetabolite through MTHF. The fact that the two regimens were not equitoxic probably also helps to explain the favourable response activity noted in the MTHF/FU bolus arm. Whether MTHF is as effective as leucovorin for biochemical modulation of FU remains to be determined in a randomized trial, for which we would recommend its combined use with bolus FU ('winner arm') using a starting dose of 400 mg/m2/day x5.