Impact of fat reduction on flavor and flavor chemistry of Cheddar cheeses

A current industry goal is to produce a 75 to 80% fat-reduced Cheddar cheese that is tasty and appealing to consumers. Despite previous studies on reduced-fat cheese, information is critically lacking in understanding the flavor and flavor chemistry of reduced-fat and nonfat Cheddar cheeses and how it differs from its full-fat counterpart. The objective of this study was to document and compare flavor development in cheeses with different fat contents so as to quantitatively characterize how flavor and flavor development in Cheddar cheese are altered with fat reduction. Cheddar cheeses with 50% reduced-fat cheese (RFC) and low-fat cheese containing 6% fat (LFC) along with 2 full-fat cheeses (FFC) were manufactured in duplicate. Cheeses were ripened at 8°C and samples were taken following 2 wk and 3, 6, and 9 mo for sensory and instrumental volatile analyses. A trained sensory panel (n = 10 panelists) documented flavor attributes of cheeses. Volatile compounds were extracted by solid-phase microextraction or solvent-assisted flavor evaporation followed by separation and identification using gas chromatography-mass spectrometry and gas chromatography-olfactometry. Selected compounds were quantified using external standard curves. Sensory properties of cheeses were distinct initially but more differences were documented as cheeses aged. By 9 mo, LFC and RFC displayed distinct burnt/rosy flavors that were not present in FFC. Sulfur flavor was also lower in LFC compared with other cheeses. Forty aroma-active compounds were characterized in the cheeses by headspace or solvent extraction followed by gas chromatography-olfactometry. Compounds were largely not distinct between the cheeses at each time point, but concentration differences were evident. Higher concentrations of furanones (furaneol, homofuraneol, sotolon), phenylethanal, 1-octen-3-one, and free fatty acids, and lower concentrations of lactones were present in LFC compared with FFC after 9 mo of ripening. These results confirm that flavor differences documented between full-fat and reduced-fat cheeses are not due solely to differences in matrix and flavor release but also to distinct differences in ripening biochemistry, which leads to an imbalance of many flavor-contributing compounds.     

TEXTURE ANALYSIS OF CHEDDAR CHEESE MADE FROM ULTRAFILTERED MILK

The textural properties of Cheddar cheese made from ultrafiltered milk were assessed. Cheddar cheeses were prepared from 1.5- and 2.0-fold concentrated milk and ripened for three months. Textural characteristics of the UF cheeses were compared to control and commercial Cheddar cheeses by sensory and instrumental measures. The texture of cheese made from UF milk differed from the control commercial Cheddar cheeses. According to the trained sensory panel, the UF cheeses were harder and more rubbery, crumbly, chewy and grainy than the control and commercial Cheddar cheeses (P <0.01). The texture profile analysis (TPA), conducted using the Instron, did not correspond to the sensory measurements nor was it successful in discriminating among the cheese samples. Lack of agreement between the sensory and instrumental tests was attributed to differences in the testing conditions and procedures of the two methods. Instrumental tests should be validated against sensory measures in order to be useful as measures of palatability. Consumer preferences for the commercial, control and UF Cheddar cheeses were significantly different (P < 0.01), the UF cheeses being less preferred in terms of flavor, texture and overall acceptability.     

Fat Mimetics in Low-Fat Cheddar Cheese

Cheeses with 60% reduced fat content were prepared with three commercial fat mimetics. Low-fat cheeses without added fat mimetics and full-fat cheeses were prepared as controls. Cheeses were aged 3 months prior to sensory and instrumental evaluation. A low-fat cheese containing one of the fat mimetics received the highest texture scores from dairy judges and consumer panelists (P≤0.05). The low-fat control and another cheese with a fat mimetic received higher flavor scores from the trained dairy judges and consumer panelists than the other cheeses containing fat mimetics (P≤0.05). Low-fat cheeses containing fat mimetics were less rubbery than the low-fat control cheese (P≤0.05).     

The effect of application of cold natural smoke on the ripening of Cheddar cheese

The present study was undertaken to study the effects of application of natural wood smoke on ripening of Cheddar cheese, and to determine the effects of smoking before or after ripening on cheese quality. A 20-kg block of Cheddar cheese obtained immediately after pressing was divided into six approximately 3-kg blocks and ripened at 8 degrees C for up to 270 d. One 3-kg block was taken after 1 d, 1, 3, 6, or 9 mo and smoked for 20 min, then returned to the ripening room for further ripening. Cheeses were sampled at intervals for lactobacilli counts, moisture, pH, and proteolysis. Sensory analysis was conducted on 6 and 9-mo-old cheeses by a trained sensory panel (n = 7). Results show that application of natural wood smoke did not significantly affect cheese pH or primary proteolysis during ripening. However, secondary proteolysis as assessed by the concentrations of free amino acids was generally higher in smoked cheeses than in control cheeses after 6 mo of ripening. Cheese smoked after 6 mo of ripening had better smoked flavor than that smoked after 9 mo of ripening. Cheese smoked after 3 mo of age and further ripened for 6 mo had the highest smoked flavor intensity. It is concluded that it is best to smoke cheese after ripening for at least 3 mo.     

Identification of aroma-active compounds in Cheddar cheese imparted by wood smoke

Cheddar cheese is the most popular cheese in the United States, and the demand for specialty categories of cheese, such as smoked cheese, are rising. The objective of this study was to characterize the flavor differences among Cheddar cheeses smoked with hickory, cherry, or apple woods, and to identify important aroma-active compounds contributing to these differences. First, the aroma-active compound profiles of hickory, cherry, and apple wood smokes were analyzed by solid-phase microextraction (SPME) gas chromatography-olfactometry (GCO) and gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS). Subsequently, commercial Cheddar cheeses smoked with hickory, cherry, or apple woods, as well as an unsmoked control, were evaluated by a trained sensory panel and by SPME GCO and GC-MS to identify aroma-active compounds. Selected compounds were quantified with external standard curves. Seventy-eight aroma-active compounds were identified in wood smokes. Compounds included phenolics, carbonyls, and furans. The trained panel identified distinct sensory attributes and intensities among the 3 cheeses exposed to different wood smokes (P < 0.05). Hickory smoked cheeses had the highest intensities of flavors associated with characteristic “smokiness” including smoke aroma, overall smoke flavor intensity, and meaty, smoky flavor. Cherry wood smoked cheeses were distinguished by the presence of a fruity flavor. Apple wood smoked cheeses were characterized by the presence of a waxy, green flavor. Ninety-nine aroma-active compounds were identified in smoked cheeses. Phenol, guaiacol, 4-methylguaiacol, and syringol were identified as the most important compounds contributing to characteristic “smokiness.” Benzyl alcohol contributed to the fruity flavor in cherry wood smoked cheeses, and 2-methyl-2-butenal and 2-ethylfuran were responsible for the waxy, green flavor identified in apple wood smoked cheeses. These smoke flavor compounds, in addition to diacetyl and acetoin, were deemed important to the flavor of cheeses in this study. Results from this study identified volatile aroma-active compounds contributing to differences in sensory perception among Cheddar cheeses smoked with different wood sources.     

Effect of microencapsulated ferrous sulfate particle size on Cheddar cheese composition and quality

Iron-fortified Cheddar cheese was manufactured with large microencapsulated ferrous sulfate (LMFS; 700–1,000 µm in diameter) or small microencapsulated ferrous sulfate (SMFS; 220–422 µm in diameter). Cheeses were aged 90 d. Compositional, chemical, and sensory characteristics were compared with control cheeses, which had no ferrous sulfate added. Compositional analysis included fat, protein, ash, moisture, as well as divalent cations iron, calcium, magnesium, and zinc. Thiobarbituric acid reactive species assay was conducted to determine lipid oxidation. A consumer panel consisting of 101 participants evaluated the cheeses for flavor, texture, appearance, and overall acceptability using a 9-point hedonic scale. Results showed 66.0% iron recovery for LMFS and 91.0% iron recovery for SMFS. Iron content was significantly increased from 0.030 mg of Fe/g in control cheeses to 0.134 mg of Fe/g of cheese for LMFS and 0.174 mg of Fe/g of cheese for SMFS. Fat, protein, ash, moisture, magnesium, zinc, and calcium contents were not significantly different when comparing iron-fortified cheeses with the control. Iron fortification did not increase lipid oxidation; however, iron fortification negatively affected Cheddar cheese sensory attributes, particularly the LMFS fortified cheese. Microencapsulation of ferrous sulfate failed to mask iron's distinct taste, color, and odor. Overall, SMFS showed better results compared with LMFS for iron retention and sensory evaluation in Cheddar cheese. Results of this study show that size of the microencapsulated particle is important in the retention of the iron in the cheese and its sensory attributes. This study provides new information on the importance of particle size with microencapsulated nutrients.     

Effect of zinc fortification on Cheddar cheese quality

Zinc-fortified Cheddar cheese containing 228 mg of zinc/kg of cheese was manufactured from milk that had 16 mg/kg food-grade zinc sulfate added. Cheeses were aged for 2 mo. Culture activity during cheese making and ripening, and compositional, chemical, texture, and sensory characteristics were compared with control cheese with no zinc sulfate added to the cheese milk. Compositional analysis included fat, protein, ash, moisture, zinc, and calcium determinations. The thiobarbituric acid (TBA) assay was conducted to determine lipid oxidation during aging. Texture was analyzed by a texture analyzer. An untrained consumer panel of 60 subjects evaluated the cheeses for hardness, off-flavors, appearance, and overall preference using a 9-point hedonic scale. Almost 100% of the zinc added to cheese milk was recovered in the zinc-fortified cheese. Zinc-fortified Cheddar cheese had 5 times more zinc compared with control cheese. Zinc-fortified cheese had higher protein and slightly higher fat and ash contents, whereas moisture was similar for both cheeses. Zinc fortification did not affect culture activity during cheese making or during the 2-mo aging period. The TBA value of control cheese was higher than that of zinc-fortified cheese at the end of ripening. Although zinc-fortified cheese was harder as determined by the texture analyzer, the untrained consumer panel did not detect differences in the sensory attributes and overall quality of the cheeses. Fortification of 16 mg/kg zinc sulfate in cheese milk is a suitable approach to fortifying Cheddar cheese without changing the quality of Cheddar cheese.     

Comparison of differences between lexicons for descriptive analysis of Cheddar cheese flavour in Ireland,New Zealand,and the United States of America

Flavour lexicons for cheese provide a way to document cheese flavour for both research and marketing. The objective of this study was to compare differences and similarities in three independently developed sensory languages for Cheddar cheese flavour at three different locations (Ireland, New Zealand, United States of America) using an international selection of Cheddar cheeses. Twelve Cheddar cheeses (four from each country) were evaluated by the three panels using the respective sensory languages. Sensory space patterns obtained by principal component analysis were consistent between the three sites indicating that the overall differentiation of the cheeses by each panel was similar. The key flavour characteristics among the cheeses were described by different attributes. Cheeses were grouped by each site by country of origin suggesting international differences in Cheddar cheese flavour. Cross-cultural differences can exist in sensory language and perception, but highly trained panels using standardized, representative languages can provide comparable results.