首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
相似文献
 共查询到20条相似文献,搜索用时 93 毫秒
1.
分析了当前互联网中两种主要的移动性技术--基于移动IP和移动SIP(会话初始协议),并且指出了单一技术实现实时移动性存在的缺陷。随着移动IP技术的发展,出现了基于移动IP的快速切换FMIPv6。在此基础上,引入了一种同时在网络层和应用层提供实时移动性支持的综合性解决方案--融合FMIPv6和SIP,给出了该综合方案的优点,弥补了单一技术存在的不足,解决了通信过程中实时移动性问题。  相似文献   

2.
下一代无线通信网络的特点是异构性和全IP化,为了在这种环境下给用户提供无缝的业务体验,必须提供一个开放的、有高度适应性的移动性管理解决方案。文章详细介绍了传统的移动性管理,并基于此分析了潜在的通用移动性管理解决方案:移动IP和会话初始化协议以及它们的优缺点。最后指出了未来无线网络移动性管理要面对的挑战。  相似文献   

3.
移动IP网络多层次移动支持机制的研究   总被引:3,自引:0,他引:3  
陆斌 《通信学报》2006,27(3):129-135
首先对业界提出的支持网络移动性的方法从网络分层的层面进行分类和比较,将支持移动性的机制分为三个层次机制:网络层移动性机制、传送层移动性机制,应用层移动性机制、对其中代表性的机制进行分析和阐述,并在此基础上,提出多层次支持IP移动性的模型和机制——多层自适应移动策略表(MLSA-MPT)机制,将不同层次(网络层和应用层)的移动性支持机制结合起来,使网络能够根据业务的实际需求,通过动态选择不同层次的移动支持机制,完成多业务和多应用环境下对移动性的支持。  相似文献   

4.
本文针对移动数据网中移动性问题对网络选路和服务质量(QoS)的影响,介绍了支持移动性的两类协议的基本原理,一种是支持宏移动性的移动IP协议,另一种是支持微移动性的IP微移动性协议。最后对三种微移动性协议的切换性能进行仿真比较。  相似文献   

5.
移动IP是IETF支持因特网上主机透明移动性的一种参考协议,在向全IP蜂窝网络演进的过程中,移动IP提供了域之间移动的解决方案,即宏移动性管理,但它不能解决在蜂窝网内移动时所遇到的问题。移动IP的种种缺陷导致了近年来各种微移动性管理协议的出现,分析了几种典型的IP层微移动性协议,在此基础上提出了对设计新的微移动性协议的几点考虑。  相似文献   

6.
本文针对移动数据网中移动性问题对网络选路和服务质量(QoS)的影响;介绍了支持移动性的两类协议的基本原理,一种是支持宏移动性的移动IP协议,另一种是支持微移动性的IP微移动性协议。最后对三种微移动性协议的切换性能进行仿真比较。  相似文献   

7.
全IP移动通信网网络层移动性管理   总被引:3,自引:1,他引:2  
首先介绍了全IP移动通信网网络层移动性管理的概念、框架和最经典的移动IP(Mobile IP)协议,然后讨论了基于Mobile IP的四种主要扩展方案:蜂窝IP、切换敏感无线接入Internet结构(HAWAII)、电信增强移动IP(TeleMIP)和边缘移动性体系结构(EMA)方案,最后结合第三代移动通信发展的状况得出了一些结论。  相似文献   

8.
文中介绍了移动SIP技术,在应用层提供对实时移动性管理的支持。随着移动IP技术的发展,近年来出现了基于移动IP的快速切换FMIPv6。在FMIPv6技术基础上,引入了一种综合性解决方案——基于SIP的实时移动性管理新架构,详细分析了该方案,并给出该方案的优点,弥补了单一协议的不足,解决了通信过程中实时移动性管理问题。  相似文献   

9.
于玉海  张平 《无线电工程》2002,32(11):39-43
该文描述了移动网络中通用个人通信(UPT)及其移动性管理概念,提出了基于移动代理技术的移动性管理方法,并对所提方法加以分析描述。  相似文献   

10.
《无线电工程》2017,(10):6-11
相比基于低轨(LEO)卫星的天基网络,基于静止轨道(GEO)卫星的天基网络具有空间节点数量少、拓扑结构简单和系统建设成本低的优点。围绕用户终端在GEO天基网络中的移动性管理问题,利用移动IP架构的位置管理功能定位并追踪移动用户终端的网络位置,基于流控制传输协议(SCTP)的多地址归属特性保证移动切换过程中数据传输连接的连续性,提出了一种融合SCTP协议和移动IP架构的GEO天基网络移动性管理方案,具有良好的网络安全特性。测试结果表明,该方案既消除了移动IP架构固有的"三角路由"缺陷,同时具有较高的切换平滑性,是解决GEO天基网络移动性管理问题的有效方案。  相似文献   

11.
The original Mobile IP (MIP) protocol does not perform Route Optimisation but uses Home Agents to forward traffic. Thus, it does not have problems with simultaneous mobility, that is, the special case when both end hosts are mobile and move at about the same time. However, MIP for IPv6 (MIPv6) uses binding updates that are sent directly to a correspondent node. Session Initiation Protocol based mobility management (SIPMM) and MIP with location registers (MIP‐LR) also use direct binding updates between a mobile host and a correspondent node. Thus, MIPv6, MIP‐LR and SIPMM are vulnerable to the simultaneous mobility problem. In this paper, we analyse the simultaneous mobility problem and solution mechanisms, and propose new ways for MIPv6, MIP‐LR and SIPMM to handle simultaneous mobility. Copyright © 2006 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.  相似文献   

12.
In Mobile IP, the signaling traffic overhead will be too high since the new Care-of-Address (CoA) of the mobile node (MN) is registered all the way with the home agent (HA) whenever the MN has moved into a new foreign network. To complement Mobile IP in better handling local movement, several IP micro protocols have been proposed. These protocols introduce a hierarchical mobility management scheme, which divides the mobility into micro mobility and macro mobility according to whether the host's movement is intra-domain or inter-domain. Thus, the requirements on performance and flexibility are achieved, especially for frequently moving hosts. This paper introduces a routing protocol for multicast source mobility on the basis of the hierarchical mobile management scheme, which provides a unified global architecture for both uni- and multicast routing in mobile networks. The implementation of multicast services adopts an improved SSM (Source Specific Multicast) model, which combines the advantages of the existing protocols in scalability and mobility transparency. Simulation results show that the proposed protocol has better performance than the existing routing protocols for SSM source mobility.  相似文献   

13.
1 IntroductionAlthoughthemobileIP protocol[1~3] workswellinthemacromobilitysituation ,someproblemsoccurinthemicromobilitysituation .Therearetwomainconcerns.First,theregistrationdelaycon tributestothehandoffdelay .Thedelayissignifi cantwhenanMNisfarawayfromhomeandcausessignificantpacketdropanddrasticreductionincom municationthroughput.Second ,frequentlocationupdatesincurextensiveoverheadforlocationcachemanagementinrouteoptimizationthatrequiresac curatelocationinformationinordertotunnelIPda…  相似文献   

14.
With developments in voice over IP (VoIP), IP-based wireless data networks and their application services have received increased attention. While multimedia applications of mobile nodes are served by Session Initiation Protocol (SIP) as a signaling protocol, the mobility of mobile nodes may be supported via Mobile IP protocol. For a mobile node that uses both Mobile IP and SIP, there is a severe redundant registration overhead because the mobile node has to make location registration separately to a home agent for Mobile IP and to a home registrar for SIP, respectively. Therefore, we propose two new schemes that integrate mobility management functionality in Mobile IP and SIP. We show performance comparisons among the previous method, which makes separate registration for Mobile IP and SIP without integration, and our two integrated methods. Numerical results show that the proposed methods efficiently reduce the amount of signaling messages and delay time related to the idle handoff and the active handoff.  相似文献   

15.
Many recent mobility solutions, including derivatives of the well‐known Mobile IP as well as emerging protocols employed by future Internet architectures, propose to realize mobility management by distributing anchoring nodes (Home Agents or other indirection agents) over the Internet. One of their main goals is to address triangle routing by optimizing routes between mobile nodes and correspondent nodes. Thus, a key component of such proposals is the algorithm to select proper mobility anchoring nodes for mobile nodes. However, most current solutions adopt a single‐anchoring approach, which means each mobile node attaches to a sole mobility anchor at one time. In this paper, “we argue that the single‐anchoring approach has drawbacks when facing various mobility scenarios. Then, we offer a novel multi‐anchoring approach that allows each mobile node to select an independent mobility anchor for each correspondent node. We show that in most cases our proposal gains more performance benefits with an acceptable additional cost by evaluation based on real network topologies. For the cases that lead to potential high cost, we also provide a lightweight version of our solution which aims to preserve most performance benefits while keeping a lower cost. At last, we demonstrate how our proposal can be integrated into current Mobile IP networks. Copyright © 2017 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.  相似文献   

16.
在基于MPLS的层次化移动IP网络中支持DiffServ的研究   总被引:2,自引:0,他引:2  
陈伟  邓银波  陈前斌  李云  隆克平 《通信学报》2004,25(12):102-112
MPLS支持DiffServ、流量工程,能为网络提供较好的QoS保证,而移动IP(MIP)能为移动设备提供较好的移动性支持。文章探讨了在无线接入网中MPLS和MIP结合实现DiffServ的方案,并给出了一种在基于MPLS的层次化MIP网络结构中支持DiffServ的体系结构,设计了其节点功能模型和关键协议。方案中利用了层次化结构的区域注册和重路由机制,减少了切换时延和网络的信令负荷。  相似文献   

17.
Mobility and QoS Support in Mobile IP Networks   总被引:13,自引:0,他引:13  
1 IntroductionAnall IP basedmobilenetworksuchas 4G ,whoseaccessandcorenetworksarebasedonIP ,hasintrinsicadvantagesoverits predecessors.Forstarters ,IPiscompatiblewith ,andindependentof,theactualradioaccesstechnology .WithIP ,onecanbasicallygetridofthelock inbetweenthecorenet workprotocol,thelinklayerandtheradioaccessprotocol.IPtoleratesavarietyofradioaccessproto cols.Itsupportsthedesignofacorenetworkthatgivescompleteflexibilitynomatterwhattheradioaccessnetworkis.Onecouldbeacorenetworkpro…  相似文献   

18.
当前主流移动IP系统的移动台(MN)端均通过优先级策略选定当前代理,即以代理管理为中心实现移动IP协议。这些方案既难以提高多模移动终端所需要的跨媒体垂直切换能力,也不利于移动IP协议本身在Windows平台下的实现。给出了Windows平台下一种以链路管理为中心的移动IP客户端的设计与实现方案。  相似文献   

19.
P-MIP: Paging Extensions for Mobile IP   总被引:13,自引:1,他引:12  
As the number of Mobile IP users grows, so will the signalling overhead associated with Internet mobility management in the core IP network. This presents a significant challenge to Mobile IP as the number of mobile devices scale-up. In cellular networks, registration and paging techniques are used to minimize the signalling overhead and optimize the mobility management performance. Currently, Mobile IP supports registration but not paging. In this paper, we argue that Mobile IP should be extended to support paging to improve the scalability of the protocol to handle large populations of mobile devices. To address this, we introduce P-MIP, a set of simple paging extensions for Mobile IP, and discuss the construction of paging areas, movement detection, registration, paging and data handling. We present analysis and simulation results for Mobile IP with and without paging extensions, and show that P-MIP can scale well supporting large numbers of mobile devices with reduced signalling under a wide variety of system conditions.  相似文献   

20.
Combinatorial Mobile IP, a new mobility management scheme for Mobile IP, is proposed and analyzed. We present how to adopt mobility management schemes on cellular networks and adapt them in Mobile IP without disrupting the nature of the Internet. We apply widely used mobility management schemes such as hierarchical architecture and paging in cellular networks to Mobile IP. We restrict paging to the area that has to be paged using local registrations. In this way, we show that the total signaling costs of Combinatorial Mobile IP are reduced compared to other micro-mobility protocols such as Mobile IP Regional Registration and P-MIP. Random walk on a connected graph is used to analyze the performance of Combinatorial Mobile IP.  相似文献   

设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号