Over the last decade, AMD waters have gained more attention as a potential source of metals due to the emerging need to recover or recycle metals from secondary resources. Metals recovery supports sustainability and the development of a circular economy with benefits for resource conservation and the environment. In this study, five extractants (Acorga M5640, LIX 54, LIX 622, LIX 622 N, and LIX 864) diluted (15% (v/v)) in Shell GTL with 2.5% (v/v) octanol were compared and evaluated for Cu recovery from an extreme AMD sample (5.3?±?0.3 g/L Cu) collected at the inactive São Domingos Mine in the Iberian Pyrite Belt of Portugal. Of the five extractants, Acorga M5640 showed the best selective efficiency. Further tests showed that 30% (v/v) of this extractant was able to selectively extract ≈ 96.0% of the Cu from the AMD in one extraction step and all of the remaining Cu (to below detection) in three steps. Among the different stripping agents tested, 2 M sulfuric acid was the most efficient, with ≈ 99% of the Cu stripped, and the recyclability of the organic phase was confirmed in five successive cycles of extraction and stripping. Furthermore, contact time tests revealed that the extraction kinetics allows the transfer of ≈ 97% of the Cu in 15 min, and aqueous to organic phase ratios tests demonstrated a maximum loading capacity of ≈ 16 g/L Cu in the organic phase. Raising the concentration of Cu in the stripping solution (2 M sulfuric acid) to ≈ 46 g/L through successive striping steps showed the potential to recover elemental Cu using traditional electrowinning. Finally, a biological approach for Cu recovery from the stripping solution was evaluated by adding the supernatant of a sulfate-reducing bacteria culture to make different molar ratios of biogenic sulfide to copper; ratios over 1.75 resulted in precipitation of more than 95% of the Cu as covellite nanoparticles.
This paper describes a study of the separation of zinc and copper from the leach liquor generated in the treatment of the zinc residue (29.6 g/L Zn and 37.4 g/L Cu) by liquid–liquid extraction. In it, the influence of the extractant type and concentration, aqueous phase acidity, contact time and stripping agent concentration were investigated. Organophosphorus extractants (D2EHPA, IONQUEST®801 and CYANEX®272) and the chelating extractants (LIX®63, LIX®984N and LIX®612N-LV) were also investigated. The organophosphorus reagents are selective for zinc, while the chelating extractants are selective for copper. In the experiment, D2EHPA was found to be the best extractant. A sulfuric acid solution was used in the stripping study. Five continuous experiments were carried out until an optimal condition for the separation of the metals Zn and Cu was achieved. Experiment 5 was carried out in three extraction steps, three scrubbing stages and five stripping stages. In this experiment, a pregnant strip solution containing 125 g/L Zn and 0.01 g/L Cu was obtained and the concentration of the metals in the raffinate was 28.3 g/L Cu and 0.49 g/L Zn. 相似文献