Intrathecal fentanyl with small-dose dilute bupivacaine: better anesthesia without prolonging recovery

Recent concern regarding lidocaine neurotoxicity has prompted efforts to find alternatives to lidocaine spinal anesthesia. Small-dose dilute bupivacaine spinal anesthesia yields a comparably rapid recovery profile but may provide insufficient anesthesia. By exploiting the synergism between intrathecal opioids and local anesthetics, it may be possible to augment the spinal anesthesia without prolonging recovery. Fifty patients undergoing ambulatory surgical arthroscopy were randomized into two groups receiving spinal anesthesia with 3 ml 0.17% bupivacaine in 2.66% dextrose without (Group I) or with (Group II) the addition of 10 microg fentanyl. Median block levels reached T7 and T8, respectively (P = not significant [NS]). Mean times to two-segment regression, S2 regression, time out of bed, time to urination, and time to discharge were 53 vs 67 min (P < 0.01), 120 vs 146 min (P < 0.05), 146 vs 163 min (P = NS), 169 vs 177 min (P = NS), and 187 vs 195 min (P = NS) respectively. Motor blockade was similar between groups, but sensory blockade was significantly more intense in Group II (P < 0.01). Six of 25 blocks failed in Group I, whereas none failed in Group II. The addition of 10 microg fentanyl to spinal anesthesia with dilute small-dose bupivacaine intensifies and increases the duration of sensory blockade without increasing the intensity of motor blockade or prolonging recovery to micturition or street fitness. IMPLICATIONS: Concerns about the neurotoxicity of lidocaine have prompted efforts to find alternatives to lidocaine spinal anesthesia. We studied 50 patients undergoing ambulatory surgical arthroscopy and found that although small-dose bupivacaine alone is inadequate for this procedure, the addition of fentanyl makes it reliable.     

Concept of stress ulcer prevention. Is re-thinking necessary?

BACKGROUND: Continuous spinal anesthesia (CSA) has been considered to be better in temporal and dose flexibility, as well as hemodynamic stability than single dose spinal anesthesia. However, the failure of spinal anesthesia is not a rare experience for anesthesiologists. Here we present our experience in solving the problem and discuss the possible causes for the failure. METHODS: 236 cases were studied retrospectively from January to December in 1996. All were over 65 years old, ASA III, scheduled for transurethral procedures or orthopedic operation. CSA was performed with 0.2% bupivacaine. Failed CSA was confirmed by positive pin-prick test at T10 dermatome(umbilicus) 30 minutes after 20 mg bupivacaine was injected. For failed cases, 5 mL 1% lidocaine was injected intrathecally for rescue. The failure rate, sensory and motor blockade, success rate by changing to lidocaine and its dosage were recorded. RESULTS: Eleven of 236 cases (4.7%) were considered spinal failure since the initial 20 mg bupivacaine could not provide adequate T10 anesthesia in 30 minutes. Addition of 5 mL 1% lidocaine produced a profound sensory and motor blockade in 9 cases, while further lidocaine injection was required in two cases. The success rate by rescuing lidocaine was 100% with an average lidocaine consumption by 52.5 +/- 4.5 mg. DISCUSSION: Factors contributed to failure spinal anesthesia including failure of technique, errors of judgment, maldistribution and failure of local anesthetic itself. However, we thought that change of pH value of local anesthetic in CSF may play a great part in these failed CSAs. Despite the reasons for failure, we demonstrate that failure of continuous spinal anesthesia by 0.2% bupivacaine can be readily resolved by 1% lidocaine.     

Comparison of lidocaine and saline for epidural top-up during combined spinal-epidural anesthesia in volunteers

This study was designed to determine the efficacy of saline as an epidural top-up to prolong spinal anesthesia during combined spinal-epidural anesthesia (CSEA). Eight volunteers received three separate CSEAs with intrathecal lidocaine (50 mg). After two-segment regression, each subject received either a saline (10 mL), lidocaine 1.5% (10 mL), or control sham (0.5 mL saline) epidural injection in a randomized, double-blind, triple cross-over fashion. Sensory block was assessed by pinprick and tolerance to transcutaneous electrical stimulation (TES) equivalent to surgical stimulation at the knee and ankle. Motor strength was assessed with iso-metric force dynamometry. Data were analyzed with a repeated measures analysis of variance and a paired t-test. Sensory block to pinprick was prolonged in the thoracolumbar dermatomes only by lidocaine (P < 0.05). Neither lidocaine nor saline prolonged the duration of tolerance to TES at the tested sites. Instead, saline decreased the duration of tolerance to TES by 20 and 24 min at the knee and ankle (P < 0.05). Recovery from motor block at the quadriceps was prolonged by an epidural injection of lidocaine (P < 0.05). We conclude that when 10 mL of epidural saline is administered after two-segment regression, it is an ineffective top-up and may decrease the duration of spinal anesthesia during CSEA.     

Intrathecal fentanyl prolongs sensory bupivacaine spinal block

The purpose of investigation was to study the effect of intrathecal fentanyl on the onset and duration of hyperbaric bupivacaine-induced spinal block in adult male patients. Forty-three patients undergoing lower extremity or genitourinary surgery were enrolled to receive either 13.5 mg hyperbaric bupivacaine 0.75% + 0.5 ml CSF it, (Group I) or 13.5 mg hyperbaric bupivacaine 0.75% + 25 micrograms fentanyl it, (Group II) according to a randomized assessor-blind protocol. The onset and duration of sensory block were assessed by pinching the skin with forceps in the midclavicular line bilaterally every two minutes for first twenty minutes and then every five to ten minutes. Similarly, the onset and duration of motor block were assessed and graded at the same time intervals using the criteria described by Bromage. The time required for two sensory segment regression and sensory regression to L1 dermatome was 74 +/- 18 and 110 +/- 33 min vs 93 +/- 22 and 141 +/- 37 min in Groups I and II, respectively (P < 0.05). Intrathecal fentanyl did not enhance the onset of sensory or motor block, or prolong the duration of bupivacaine-induced motor spinal block. Fewer patients demanded pain relief in the fentanyl-treated group than in the control group in the early postoperative period (19% vs 59%; P < 0.05). Episodes of hypotension were more frequent in the fentanyl-treated group than in the control group (43% vs 14%; P < 0.05). We conclude that fentanyl, 25 micrograms it, prolonged the duration of bupivacaine-induced sensory block (sensory regression to L1 dermatone) by 28% and reduced the analgesic requirement in the early postoperative period following bupivacaine spinal block.     

Subarachnoid anesthesia with minimal doses of lidocaine in ambulatory arthroscopic surgery of the knee

The objective is demonstrate that subarachnoid anesthesia with 2% isobaric lidocaine at low doses (0.5 mg/kg) is safe and effective for outpatient arthroscopic surgery of the knee. This was a prospective study of 150 ASA I-III patients undergoing arthroscopic knee surgery as outpatients under subarachnoid anesthesia. With no prior vascular filling, we provided blockade by administering 2% isobaric lidocaine at a dose of 0.5 mg/kg through a Sprotte 25G needle without vasoconstrictor. We assessed effectiveness and degree of sensory-motor blockade, cardiovascular repercussions, recovery time (until reversal of blockade, ambulation, micturition and discharge) as well as side effects observed. The mean dose of lidocaine used was 33.44 +/- 4.16 mg. The sensory-motor blockade achieved provided optimum conditions for prevention of ischemia and the practice of the surgical procedure in all cases. Surgery lasted a mean 38 +/- 10 min. Hemodynamic changes were not clinically significant and no patients additional fluids, atropine or vasopressors. Time from start of blockade until ambulation, micturition and discharge from the recovery unit were 123 +/- 8.3, 175 +/- 12.4 and 194 +/- 13.4 min, respectively. Micturition was spontaneous in all cases. Complications recorded were cephalea and backache. In conclusion, subarachnoid anesthesia at low doses of 2% isobaric lidocaine provides excellent conditions for practicing arthroscopic surgery of the knee on outpatients, with minimum side effects.     

Correction of adolescent idiopathic thoracic scoliosis with a new type of offset apical instrumentation: preliminary results

STUDY OBJECTIVES: To determine the approximate incidence of transient neurologic symptoms (TNS) [formerly known as transient radicular irritation (TRI)] associated with procaine spinal anesthesia, and whether fentanyl prolongs the duration of procaine spinal anesthesia. DESIGN: Unrandomized pilot study. SETTING: Community teaching hospital. PATIENTS: 106 consecutive patients scheduled for spinal anesthesia for procedures anticipated to last less than 90 minutes. INTERVENTIONS: All patients received 5% procaine for spinal anesthesia. Fentanyl 20 micrograms was added for procedures anticipated to last longer than 45 minutes (but less than 90 min). Intraoperatively the adequacy of duration, level, and intensity of anesthesia were observed. Time from injection of local anesthetic until knee-bending was recorded. Three days postoperatively, patients were questioned intensively in an effort to determine whether back pain and/or symptoms consistent with TNS had occurred. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Duration of anesthesia was adequate in all but one instance. The intensity and the sensory level of anesthesia were satisfactory with one exception, a woman who had an unexpectedly low sensory level (L1) after 60 mg of procaine for cerclage, and who was also was the only patients to develop TNS. The incidence of TNS (0.9%) was markedly less than that reported after lidocaine and similar to the incidence observed after bupivacaine. Mild back pain without radiation occurred in 11 patients (10%), an incidence that is similar to that seen after bupivacaine and lidocaine. Compared with procaine alone, the addition of fentanyl significantly (p = 0.0001) prolonged the time to bending knees from 72 minutes to 97 minutes. CONCLUSIONS: Procaine may be a useful alternative to lidocaine for short procedures, and it is less likely to produce TNS. Fentanyl prolongs motor block when added to procaine.     

Extraordinary features in the Chlamydomonas reinhardtii chloroplast genome: (1). rps2 as part of a large open reading frame; (2). A C. reinhardtii specific repeat sequence

PURPOSE: To evaluate the clinical efficacy of local vaginal lidocaine application for pain relief during high-dose-rate (HDR) intracavitary brachytherapy for patients with cervical cancer, and to investigate sequential changes in serum levels of lidocaine during the procedures. METHODS AND MATERIALS: This prospective study was designed to examine the analgesic effect, physical response, and side effects of local anesthesia during HDR intracavitary brachytherapy. Forty patients were enrolled. All patients received 10-15 MV X-rays to the pelvis with a total dose of 45-59.4 Gy 5-6 weeks before undergoing HDR intracavitary brachytherapy. All patients underwent first intracavitary brachytherapy under general anesthesia. These patients were randomly allocated to receive one of two different treatment protocols as follows: (1) treatment session - control session - treatment session - control session; or (2) control session - treatment session- control session - treatment session. In the treatment sessions, topical anesthesia was administered using 4 ml of 10% lidocaine solution sprayed liberally on the cervix and vagina during intracavitary brachytherapy. In the control sessions, a placebo was administered in the same manner during brachytherapy. The Hensche's applicators for brachytherapy were inserted into the cervix and vagina 5 min after lidocaine application. The visual analogue scale (VAS) was used to assess pain and discomfort during brachytherapy. Blood pressure and heart rates were measured to evaluate the physiological response. Another prospective study was then performed to investigate the sequential changes of serum lidocaine levels during the anesthetic procedure. Eleven additional patients with similar disease state and demographic characteristics were enrolled and blood samples were obtained before, and 5, 15, 30, and 45 min after the initiation of lidocaine application. RESULTS: The mean VAS values recorded during the treatment sessions and control sessions were 49.9 +/- 24.1 versus 60.1 +/- 24.8, respectively. The value of VAS in the treatment session was significantly lower than that of the control session (p < 0.001). No statistically significant differences were found in the changes of blood pressure and heart rate and in the incidence of side effects during these two types of sessions (p > 0.05). In the drug-level study, serum levels of lidocaine reached a peak 5 min after the initiation of local anesthesia. The mean peak concentrations (Cmax) of lidocaine were 0.50 +/- 0.45 microg/ml. CONCLUSION: Local vaginal anesthesia with 10% lidocaine solution can significantly decrease the degree of painful sensation during HDR intracavitary brachytherapy, and is safe to administer for the procedure for cervical cancer.     

Erythrocyte Na/K ATPase activity and diabetes: relationship with C-peptide level

The purpose of this study is to clarify the volume effect of epidural saline injection 20 min after spinal anesthesia. Thirty patients undergoing combined spinal and epidural anesthesia for orthopedic surgery were randomly divided into two groups: a control group (n = 15) and a saline group (n = 15). In the control group, 2% lidocaine 3 ml with 0.4% tetracaine was injected into the subarachnoid space from L 4-5 interspace using Durasafe (Becton Dickinson, USA) and saline was not injected into the epidural space. In the saline group, saline 10 ml was injected through an epidural catheter 20 min after spinal anesthesia. The levels of analgesia 20 min after spinal anesthesia were not significantly different between the groups. However, the levels of analgesia 3, 5, 10, 40 and 100 min after epidural saline injection in the saline group were significantly higher than those in the control group (P < 0.05). The highest analgesic level was obtained 10 min after epidural saline injection and reached to T 4.3 +/- 1.1. In conclusion, epidural saline injection increases the analgesic level 20 min after spinal anesthesia because of the volume effect.     

The effect of epinephrine on small-dose hyperbaric bupivacaine spinal anesthesia: clinical implications for ambulatory surgery

The effect of adding epinephrine to small doses of spinal bupivacaine on the duration of sensory motor block has not been carefully investigated. Twelve volunteers underwent hyperbaric bupivacaine spinal anesthesia (7.5 mg) with and without epinephrine (0.2 mg) in a randomized, double-blind, cross-over fashion. Sensory block was assessed with pinprick, transcutaneous electrical stimulation (TES) equivalent to surgical stimulation (at umbilicus, pubis, knee, and ankle), and tolerance of a pneumatic thigh tourniquet. Motor block was assessed with isometric force dynamometry. Discharge criteria were defined as return of pinprick sensation to dermatome S2, ability to ambulate, and ability to urinate. Extent of sensory block to pinprick over time was unaffected by the addition of epinephrine. However, epinephrine prolonged tolerance of TES at the pubis, knee, and ankle (33-48 min, P < 0.05) and of thigh tourniquet (30 min, P < 0.01). Motor block was prolonged by epinephrine at the quadriceps and gastrocnemius muscles (by 23 and 51 min, respectively, P < 0.002). Achievement of discharge criteria was prolonged by 48 min by the addition of epinephrine (P < 0.01). Thus, epinephrine may prolong surgical anesthesia for lower abdominal and lower extremity surgery and delay time until patients achieve discharge criteria. Implications: Using a cross-over study design, 12 volunteers underwent bupivacaine spinal anesthesia with and without epinephrine. This study suggests that adding epinephrine to bupivacaine may prolong surgical anesthesia and also delay patients' discharge.     

Alteration of renal blood flow during epidural anesthesia in normal subjects

The cardiovascular consequences of epidural anesthesia secondary to sympathetic blockade are well documented; however, their repercussions on renal hemodynamics in humans have not been reported. We investigated the effect of epidural anesthesia on renal blood flow (RBF) in 13 healthy volunteers 18-45 yr of age. RBF was measured using paraaminohippurate clearance before and after bilateral T6 epidural sensory block (to ensure adequate sympathetic renal nerve blockade). Epidural anesthesia was established using 22 +/- 3 mL of 2% plain lidocaine (without epinephrine) via L1-L2 epidural catheter; urine output was measured using a three-way Foley catheter. Mean arterial pressure remained > or = 70 mm Hg in all subjects without any pharmacologic intervention. Mean RBF before epidural anesthesia was 16.1 +/- 6.8 mL.kg-1.min-1 and 14.3 +/- 2.9 mL.kg-1.min-1 after bilateral T6 epidural blockade. We conclude that the institution of epidural anesthesia in healthy subjects does not result in a significant change in RBF (P > 0.25).     

Pharmacology of local anesthetics and clinical aspects of segmental blocking. II. Spinal anesthesia

Clinical picture of development of segmental blocking after subarachnoidal injection of hyperbaric solutions of 0.75% bupivacaine, 5% ultracaine, and isobaric 0.5% bupivacaine is studied. A total of 152 patients operated on the lower part of the body and the lower limbs were examined under conditions of single, prolonged subarachnoidal, and combined spinal epidural anesthesia. Ultracaine and bupivacaine in different concentrations with different barism provided anesthesia equivalent by the efficacy, depth, and dissemination of sensory block. Segmental blocking with 5% ultracaine was characterized by the shortest latent period (3.14 +/- 0.16 min, p < 0.05) but was no shorter (124.1 +/- 3.37 min) than operative analgesia with 0.75% hyperbaric bupivacaine (120.0 +/- 5.10 min). Isobaric bupivacaine provided the longest effective analgesia (215.0 +/- 45.0 min, p < 0.05). Microcatheter technique improved the safety and control of subarachnoidal anesthesia in comparison with a single injection, and combined spinal epidural anesthesia shortened the latent period of segmental blocking and ensured intraoperative anesthesia and postoperative analgesia at the expense of the epidural component.     

Nitrous oxide enhances the level of sensory block produced by intrathecal lidocaine

We examined the effect of nitrous oxide (N2O) administration on the level of sensory block produced by intrathecal lidocaine in patients undergoing transurethral procedures. Twenty minutes after subarachnoid injection of 100 mg (5%) hyperbaric lidocaine, the level of block to pressure sensation was assessed. After establishing the baseline sensory block, patients were randomly assigned to receive either 50% nitrogen (control group) or 50% N2O in oxygen for 10 min, and the sensory level was reassessed. All patients then received 35% oxygen for 5 min, and the level of block to pressure was assessed again. Changes were measured in centimeters and standardized by dividing those results by the height of patients (in centimeters). Ten minutes after nitrogen or N2O administration, a 3.8-cm regression of sensory block was found in the control group, and a 1.8-cm cephalad increase was found in the treatment group (P < 0.0001). Discontinuation of N2O for 5 min resulted in a rapid regression of the level of sensory block (4 cm in the N2O group versus 1.9 cm in the control group, P < 0.0001). However, 5 min after discontinuation of N2O, the overall regression of the sensory block in the control group, when measured from the baseline, was 5.7 cm versus 2.2 cm in the N2O group (P < 0.001). The differences between the two groups before standardization are consistent with those after standardization (t = 9.02 at 10 min, t = 4.24 at 15 min, and t = 3.97 for the overall change at 15 min). The results suggest that inhalation of 50% N2O enhances the level of sensory block produced by intrathecal lidocaine. IMPLICATIONS: We measured the level of sensory block produced by subarachnoid anesthesia with lidocaine before and after inhalation of 50% nitrous oxide for 10 min. Nitrous oxide enhanced the level of subarachnoid anesthesia with minimal hemodynamic effects. These findings are of clinical importance when subarachnoid anesthesia subsides before the completion of surgery.     

Spinal anaesthesia with 0.5% hyperbaric bupivacaine in elderly patients: effect of site of injection on spread of analgesia

In this randomized, observer-blind study, we have examined, in elderly patients, the effect of site of injection on analgesia levels after spinal injection of 0.5% hyperbaric bupivacaine solution. Thirty male patients, aged 68-87 yr, undergoing minor urological surgery during spinal anaesthesia received 3 ml of a 0.5% hyperbaric bupivacaine solution at either the L3-4 (n = 15) or L4-5 (n = 15) interspace. The solution was injected with the patient in the sitting position. The patient remained sitting for 2 min and was then placed in the supine horizontal position. Analgesia levels were assessed bilaterally using pin-prick. The highest analgesia levels did not differ between groups (medians were approximately T7). There were no significant differences in the time to maximum cephalad spread of analgesia, maximum degree of motor block or haemodynamic changes. We conclude that injection at the L4-5 interspace has no advantage compared with injection at the L3-4 interspace.     

Dose-response relationship of clonidine with epidural administration of ropivacaine in orthopedic procedures of the lower extremities

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to investigate preliminarydose-range effects of clonidine added to ropivacaine for epidural analgesia in elective orthopedic surgery of the lower limbs with doses, causing a minimum of cardiovascular side effects. METHODS: 60 patients were randomly assigned to receive in a double-blind fashion a mixture of 1 mg/cm height ropivacaine plus saline or 1 mg/cm ropivacaine plus 25 micrograms, 50 micrograms, 75 micrograms, 100 micrograms or 150 micrograms clonidine for epidural analgesia. The sensory and motor function were determined at defined time intervals for 30 minutes. Heart rate and blood pressure were controlled and sedation score was judged. The postoperative 2-segment-regression of pin-prick and the onset of pain were recorded. RESULTS: The six groups were comparable in demographic data and in term of onset time. The prolongation of analgesia reached 513 +/- 92 min (p = 0.002) for 150 micrograms clonidine, 460 +/- 148 min (p = 0.073) for 100 micrograms clonidine, 440 +/- 86 min (p = 0.057) for 75 micrograms clonidine compared with 347 +/- 114 min for saline. In an equal manner, 2-segment-regression for pin-prick was extended to 251 +/- 47 min (p = 0.018) for 150 micrograms clonidine, 238 +/- 33 min (p = 0.034) for 100 micrograms clonidine, 229 +/- 29 min (p = 0.027) for 75 micrograms clonidine and 178 +/- 43 min for saline. Heart rate dropped down in all groups. Mean arterial pressure decreased significantly in the groups with 75, 100 and 150 micrograms clonidine. Sedation score increased continuously from 0.6 +/- 0.5 (saline) to 1.8 +/- 0.8 (150 micrograms clonidine). CONCLUSION: We conclude that 150 micrograms clonidine significantly enhances the duration of analgesia of epidurally administered ropivacaine in a mean of 171 mg. This time interval is longer than the one with 200 mg ropivacaine alone. But, there are side effects in form of decrease of arterial pressure. Cardiovascular monitoring seems to be essential. Because of the enhanced analgesia duration, the time interval for reloading epidural anaesthesia are increased.     

Changes in human evoked spinal potentials (ESP) by epidural lidocaine

Controversies exist on the sites of action of epidural anesthesia. Leading opinion says that it works on spinal nerve root. We examined ESP and tactile sensations in 4 patients during epidural anesthesia with lidocaine to determine the effects of the anesthesia on spinal cord. Prolongation of latency and decrease in amplitude of ESP appeared 10 min after injection of 1.5% lidocaine 4 ml, each parameter reaching maximum value of 115% and 60% of the control value 30 min afterwards, respectively. Then they started to recover slowly, reaching normal values 150 min later. Changes in ESP and tactile sensation were closely related. Decreases in amplitude to 90%, 80%, 60% of the control values were observed for hypesthesia, analgesia, and anesthesia, respectively. We conclude that the spinal cord also is an important site of action of epidural anesthesia.     

Alkalinization of lidocaine does not hasten the onset of axillary brachial plexus block

We assessed the onset of sensory and motor blockade as well as the distribution of sensory blockade after axillary brachial plexus block with 1.5% lidocaine hydrochloride 1:200,000 epinephrine with and without sodium bicarbonate in 38 patients. The onset of analgesia and anesthesia was recorded over the distributions of the median, ulnar, radial, and medial cutaneous nerves of the forearm, medial cutaneous and lateral cutaneous nerves of the arm, and musculocutaneous nerve. The onset of motor blockade of elbow and wrist movements was also recorded. Data were analyzed by using survival techniques and compared by using log rank tests. Only the onset of analgesia in the medial cutaneous nerves of the arm and forearm, and the onset of anesthesia in the medial cutaneous nerve of the arm were significantly faster (P < 0.05) with alkalinization of lidocaine. Our study showed that alkalinization of lidocaine does not significantly hasten block onset in most terminal nerve distributions. IMPLICATIONS: We examined whether alkalinizing a local anesthetic would quicken the onset of a regional upper limb nerve blockade. We found that alkalinization of lidocaine did not offer a significant clinical advantage in axillary brachial plexus blockade.     

Unilateral spinal anaesthesia with hyperbaric bupivacaine

BACKGROUND: The dosage of local anaesthetic and the time the patient must be kept in the lateral decubitus position for a unilateral spinal anaesthesia is not known. The aim of this study was to determine the ideal dosage of hyperbaric bupivacaine and the time required for the lateral decubitus position for a unilateral spinal block. METHODS: Ninety patients who were scheduled to receive spinal block for surgery in the lower extremity were randomised into 9 groups (n = 10). The spinal block was performed through the L4-L5 intervertebral space with the patient in the lateral decubitus position. Patients in groups Ia, Ib, Ic; IIa, IIb, IIc; IIIa, IIIb, IIIc received 1.5 ml of 0.5%, 2 ml of 0.5%, and 2.5 ml of 0.5% hyperbaric bupivacaine solutions, respectively. The patients were turned to the supine position for 5 min after the injection in groups Ia, IIa, IIIa, 10 min after the injection in groups Ib, IIb, IIIb, and 15 min after the injection in groups Ic, IIc, IIIc. The onset and regression of sensory and motor block were checked and compared between the dependent and non-dependent sides in each group. RESULTS: The rate of block progression of the non-dependent side was higher in the groups receiving 2.5 ml 0.5% hyperbaric bupivacaine solution than in the other groups; at the same time the level of block was higher and the duration of block was longer. The incidence of hypotension was 10-20% in these groups. In the 2 ml 0.5% hyperbaric bupivacaine solution groups, a satisfactory block level and duration of anaesthesia for surgery was obtained. The rate of block progression to non-dependent side in the groups receiving 1.5 ml of 0.5% hyperbaric bupivacaine solution was lower than the other groups, but the duration of block was shorter and the level of block was lower than the other groups. CONCLUSION: For unilateral spinal anaesthesia in lower extremity operations, 2ml 0.5% hyperbaric bupivacaine solution for operations above the knee and 1.5 ml 0.5% hyperbaric bupivacaine solution for operations below the knee and keeping the patients for 10 min in the lateral decubitus position were found to be appropriate.     

The efficacy of epinephrine test doses during spinal anesthesia in volunteers: implications for combined spinal-epidural anesthesia

Epinephrine test doses may be administered during combined spinal-epidural anesthesia to determine intravascular placement of epidural catheters. This study was designed to determine systolic blood pressure (SBP) and heart rate (HR) responses to intravenous injection of epinephrine (15 microg) during spinal anesthesia. Twelve volunteers received three spinal anesthetics (lidocaine 100 mg, tetracaine 15 mg, and bupivacaine 15 mg) in a randomized, double blind, cross-over fashion. Epinephrine was administered prior to spinal anesthesia (control), 30 min after injection of spinal anesthesia, and at regression of sensory block to T-10. SBP was measured with a radial arterial catheter and HR with an electrocardiogram. Positive responses were defined as peak increase in SBP > or = 15 mm Hg or HR > or = 20 bpm after injection of epinephrine. Compared with control, peak SBP responses decreased by a mean of 12 mm Hg during spinal anesthesia with tetracaine and bupivacaine (P < 0.05). Peak HR responses decreased by 11 bpm during all three spinal anesthetics (P < 0.05). Incidences of detection of intravenous injection by positive SBP and HR responses ranged from 50% to 100% and were not significantly affected by spinal anesthesia. Spinal anesthesia reduces hemodynamic responses to intravenous epinephrine injection but is unlikely to reduce detection by positive SBP and HR criteria.     

Peridural anesthesia versus subarachnoid anesthesia in cesarean section. Prospective clinical study

OBJECTIVE: To compare technical and clinical differences between epidural and spinal anesthesia for cesarean section. STUDY DESIGN: Randomized prospective trial. PATIENTS AND METHODS: 64 pregnant women at term scheduled for elective cesarean section. Two groups were randomized: A) PD Group (n = 32): continuous epidural anesthesia by administration of bupivacaine 0.5% plus epinephrine 1/400,000 via an epidural catheter. Epidural morphine 3 mg was administered at the end of surgery. B) SP Group (n = 32): "single shot" spinal anesthesia by intrathecal administration of hyperbaric 1% bupivacaine 1-1.4 ml plus morphine 0.2 mg. The pin prick block level reached T2-T6 at incision time. DATA COLLECTION: 1) Time from the beginning of anesthesia to surgical incision. 2) Hypotension episodes. 3) Ephedrine consumption. 4) Intraoperative discomfort at delivery, traction and uterine manipulation, peritoneal toilette. 5) Nausea and vomiting. 6) Apgar score. 7) Postoperative headache. RESULTS: Women in the SP group had more hypotensive episodes (81% vs 53%: p < 0.05) and more ephedrine consumption with a large individual variability (29.12 mg +/- 20.4 vs 12.83 +/- 13.8: p < 0.01) when compared to PD group, without any difference in the Apgar score. The SP group required less time consumption (10.5 min. +/- 6.7 vs 35.9 min. +/- 17.3: p < 0.01) and had less intraoperative discomfort with less analgesic and/or sedative drugs consumption (9.7% vs 29%: p < 0.05) and less vomiting (3% vs 22.5%: p < 0.05). No postoperative headache was noticed in both groups. CONCLUSIONS: With the described pharmacological and technical approach, spinal anesthesia is more suitable than continuous epidural technique for cesarean section, unless contraindicated.     

Use of a soluble tetrazolium compound to assay metabolic activation of intact beta cells

The study was performed to evaluate differential neural blockade during lumbar epidural anesthesia with a cutaneous current perception threshold (CPT) sensory testing device. Fourteen patients undergoing elective gynecological surgery received 10 ml of 2% lidocaine through an epidural catheter inserted at the L 1/2 interspace. CPTs at 2000, 250, and 5 Hz stimulation and sensation to light touch, temperature, and pinprick at ipsilateral dermatomes V, Th 9, and L 2 were measured before and every 5 min, until 60 min after the epidural lidocaine. The epidural block caused a significant increase in all CPTs at dermatome L 2 and in CPTs at 250 and 5 Hz at Th 9. Touch sensation at Th 9 was intact during the study period in 12 patients, most of whom lost sensation to the other stimulus: 12 patients did not respond to the cold stimulus and 10 patients to the pinprick. At L 2, sensory block to light touch, temperature, and pinprick was found in 11, 14, and 14 patients, respectively. There was no effect on any measurements made at V. In conclusion, epidural lidocaine results in a differential neural blockade as measured with CPT testing. Since the 2000-Hz stimulus detect abnormalities that correlate with large fiber functioning, it is suggested that loss of touch sensation is associated with effects of epidural lidocaine on large fibers.